Skip to main content

Table 3 Median OS and DFS in trials comparing gemcitabine combined with targeted therapy with gemcitabine alone.

From: A meta-analysis of gemcitabine containing chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Trial

Regimen (per arm)

No. of pts

Median OS (mons)

HR (95% CI)

p value

Median PFS/TTP (mons)

HR (95%CI)

p value

Moore MJ 2007

Gem/erlotinib

285

6.24

0.82

0.038*

3.75

0.77

0 .004*

 

Gem

284

5.91

(0.69-0.99)

 

3.55

(0.64-0.92)

 

Philip A 2010

Gem/C-225

372

6.3

1.06

0 .23

3.4

1.07

0.18

 

Gem

371

5.9

(0.91-1.23)

 

3.0

(0.93-1.24)

 

Van Cutsem E 2004

Gem/tipifarnib

341

6.4

1.03

0 .75

3.7

1.03

0 .72

 

Gem

347

6.1

(0.86-1.23)

 

3.6

(0.87-1.22)

 

Saif W 2009

Gem/LY293111

67

7.1

UA

> 0.05

3.7

UA

> 0.05

 

Gem

66

8.3

  

3.4

  

Spano JP 2008

Gem/axitinib

69

6.9

0·71

UA

4.2

 

UA

 

Gem

34

5.6

(0.44-1.13)

 

3.7

(0.43-1.45)

 

Bramhall SR 2002

Gem/marimastat

120

5.5

0.99

0.95

3.1

0.68

0.68

 

Gem

119

5.5

(0.76-1.30)

 

3.2

(0.73-1.23)

 

Kindler HL 2010

Gem/bevacizumab

302

5.8

1.004

0.95

3.8

UA

0.075

 

Bev

300

5.9

(0.88-1.24)

 

2.9

  

Richards DA 2006

Gem/CI-994

85

6.5

0.980

0.904

3.1

0.837

0.304

 

Gem

88

7.1

(0.701-1.370)

 

3.4

(0.596-1.175)

 

Friess H 2006

Gem/cilengitide

46

6.8

UA

> 0.05

3.7

UA

> 0.05

 

Gem

43

7.8

  

3.8

 Â