Skip to main content

Table 4 Sensitivity analyses by response criteria and significant elements of quality

From: Comparative efficacy of tandem autologous versus autologous followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Subgroup

Outcome

Studies

Patients

HR or RR

95% CI

Heterogeneity

Test of Interaction

Tool used to capture response

EBMT criteria

ORR (per-protocol)

1

195

0.96

(0.96–1.04)

NA

0.26

Non-EBMT/IUR criteria

1

104

0.94

(0.82–1.08)

NA

Criteria not reported

1

199

1.06

(0.95–1.18)

NA

EBMT criteria

CR (per-protocol)

2

305

2.05

(0.71–5.98)

85%

0.12

IUR criteria

1

522

1.29

(1.08–1.54)

NA

Non-EBMT/IUR criteria

1

104

2.11

(1.23–3.63)

NA

Criteria not reported

1

199

1.86

(1.29–1.54)

NA

At least 1:2 ratio of auto-allo HCT versus auto-auto HCT

Yes

OS (per-protocol)

1

104

0.55

(0.32–0.94)

NA

0.04

No

 

1

110

1.51

(0.70–3.27)

NA

 

Description of withdrawals/dropouts

Yes

OS (ITT)

2

872

0.81

(0.34–1.92)

92%

0.93

No

1

357

0.77

(0.55–1.08)

NA

Report calculation of sample size

Yes

OS (ITT)

1

710

1.24

(0.94–1.64)

NA

0.007

No

2

519

0.64

(0.43–0.95)

58%

  1. Abbreviations: EBMT: European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation response criteria; IUR: International Uniform Response criteria; ORR: overall response rate; CR: complete response; OS: overall survival; ITT: intention-to-treat; NA: not applicable.