Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical trials with ibrutinib and idelalisib in CLL patients

From: Targeting neoplastic B cells and harnessing microenvironment: the “double face” of ibrutinib and idelalisib

Study

First line or treated subset

Phase

Number of patients

Age, median (range)

Scheme

ORR (CR)

PFS

TP53 (%)

ORR (CR)

PFS

      

All cases

All cases

 

TP53 subset

TP53 subset

Byrd, NEJM 2013 [3]

Relapsed

1b/2

85

66 (37–82)

Ibru mono

71 + 18a (2 %)

75 % at 26 ms

33 %

68 % (4 %)

57 % at 26 ms

O’Brian, Lancet Oncol 2014 [7]

First line

1b/2

29

71 (65–84)

Ibru mono

71 + 13 %a (13 %)

96 % at 24 ms

6 %

NA

NA

Farooqui, lancet Oncol 2015 [9]

Treated or untreated with TP53 aberrations

2

51

62 (33–82)

Ibru mono

-

-

100 %

50 + 42 %a

82 % at 24 ms

Byrd, NEJM 2014 [4]

Relapsed/refractory

3

391

67 (30–86)b

Ibru vs. Ofa

43 + 20 %a (0 %)

88 % at 6 ms

32 %

NA

83 % at 6 ms

Burger, Lancet Oncol 2014 [6]

High-risk previously treated or untreated

2

40

63 (35–82)

Ibru + RTX

95 % (8 %)

78 % at 18 ms

50 %

100 % (10 %)

72 % at 18 ms

Brown, Blood 2014 [14]

Relapsed/refractory

1

54

63 (37–82)

Ide mono

39 + 33 %a (0 %)

50 % at 16 ms

24 %

54 % (0 %)

50 % at 3 ms

Furman, NEJM 2014 [15]

Relapsed

3

220

71 (48–90)b

Ide + RTX vs. placebo

81 % (0 %)

93 % at 6 ms

38 %

NA

NA

  1. Ibru ibrutinib, Ide idelalisib, RTX rituximab, Ofa ofatumumab, mono monotherapy, ORR overall response rate, CR complete response, PFS progression-free survival; ms months, NA not available
  2. aThe percentages are the ORR (CR and PR) + the PR with persistent lymphocytosis
  3. bData of ibrutinib or idelalisib arm