Skip to main content

Table 2 The outcomes of CAR-T therapy with different costimulatory molecules for CLL patients in published trials

From: Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Signal

Target

Study

Number

Preconditioning

Source

Cell dose

ORR and CRR

CD28

CD19

2011.Brentjens

8

None (3)

Autologous

Without preconditioning: 1.2–3.0 × 107/kg

ORR 1/7 (14.3%)

CRR 0/7 (0%)

Cyclophosphamide (5)

With preconditioning: 0.4–1.0 × 107/kg

One died before evaluation

2012.Kochenderfer

4

Fludarabine + cyclophosphamide (4)

Autologous

0.3–2.8 × 107/kg

ORR 3/4 (75.0%)

CRR 1/4 (25.0%)

2013.Cruz

4

None

Allogeneic

1.5–12 × 107/m2

ORR 1/4 (25.0%)

CRR 0/4 (0%)

2015.Kochenderfer

4

Fludarabine + cyclophosphamide (4)

Autologous

1–4 × 106/kg

ORR 4/4 (100%)

CRR 3/4 (75.0%)

2015.Kochenderfer

2016.Brudno

5

None

Allogeneic

0.4–3.1 × 106/kg

ORR 2/5 (40.0%)

CRR 1/5 (20.0%)

2018.Geyer

8

Cyclophosphamide (8)

Autologous

3 × 106/kg, 1 × 107/kg

3 × 107/kg

ORR 2/8 (25.0%)

CRR 2/8 (25.0%)

κ

2016. Ramos

2

None

Autologous

9.1 × 107/m2

ORR 0/2 (0%)

1.6 × 108/m2

CRR 0/2 (0%)

CD137

CD19

2011.Kalos

14

Bendamustine (6)

Autologous

0.14–11 × 108

ORR 8/14 (57.1%)

2011.Porter

Fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (3)

CRR 4/14 (28.6%)

2015.Porter

Pentostatin/cyclophosphamide (5)

2017.Turtle

24

Fludarabine + cyclophosphamide (21)

Autologous

2 × 105/kg, 2 × 106/kg

ORR 16/23 (69.6%)

Fludarabine (2)

CRR 4/23 (17.4%)

Cyclophosphamide (1)

2 × 107/kg

One died before evaluation

  1. Abbreviations: ORR overall response rate, CRR complete remission rate