Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical trials of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer

From: The application and prospect of CDK4/6 inhibitors in malignant solid tumors

CDK inhibitors

Study ID

Phase

Lines

Patients

Regimens

Efficacy

Palbociclib

PALOMA-1 [25]

II

First-line

HR+/HER2− ABC

Palbociclib + letrozole (n = 84)/letrozole (n = 81)

mPFS 20.2 m vs 10.2 m, HR 0.488, 95% CI 0.319–0.748, p = 0.0004

 

PALOMA-2 [36]

III

First-line

HR+/HER2− ABC

Palbociclib + letrozole (n = 444)/letrozole (n = 222)

mPFS 24.8 m vs 14.5 m, HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46–0.72, p < 0.001

 

PALOMA-3 [30]

III

First/second-line

HR+/HER2− ABC with previous ET

Palbociclib + fluvastatin (n = 347)/fluvastatin (n = 174)

mOS 34.9 m vs 28.0 m, HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64–1.03, p = 0.09

 

NCT01684215 [37]

II

First-line

Postmenopausal Japanese patients with HR+/HER2− ABC

Palbociclib + letrozole (n = 42)

PFS at 1 year 75.0%, mPFS NR, ORR 40.5%, DCR 85.75%

 

NCT02592746 (active, not recruiting)

II

First/second/third-line

Premenopausal Women With HR+ MBC

Palbociclib + exemestane + leuprolide acetate/capecitabine (N = 182)

mPFS 9.2 m vs 3.8 m, p < 0.001

Ribociclib

MONALEESA-2 [38]

III

First-line

Postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2− ABC

Ribociclib + letrozole (n = 334)/letrozole (n = 334)

mPFS NR vs 14.7 m, HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.43–0.72, p < 0.001

 

MONALEESA-3 [39]

III

First/second-line

HR+/HER2− ABC

Ribociclib + fulvestrant (n = 484)/fulvestrant (n = 242)

mPFS 20.5 m vs 12.8 m, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48–0.73, p < 0.001

 

MONALEESA-7 [40]

III

First/second-line

Premenopausal women with HR+/HER2− ABC

Ribociclib + ET (n = 335)/ET (n = 337)

mPFS 23.8 m vs 13.0 m, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.44–0.69, p < 0.001

 

TRINITI-1

NCT02732119 (active, not recruiting)

I/II

Non-first line

Patients with HR+/HER2− ABC

Ribociclib + everolimus + exemestane (n = 107)

mPFS 5.7 m, ORR 8.4%

Abemaciclib

MONARCH-1 [35]

II

Non-first line

Refractory HR+/HER2− ABC

Abemaciclib (n = 132)

ORR 19.7%, clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD ≥ 6.0 m) 42.4%, mPFS 6.0 m, mOS 17.7 m

 

MONARCH-2 [31]

III

Non-first line

HR+/HER2− ABC

Abemaciclib + fulvestrant (n = 446)/fulvestrant (n = 223)

mPFS 16.4 m vs 9.3 m, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45–0.68, p < 0.001

 

MONARCH 3 [33]

III

First-line

Postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2− ABC

Abemaciclib + nonsteroidal AI (n = 223)/nonsteroidal AI (n = 223)

mPFS NR vs 14.7 m, HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41–0.72, p < 0.001, ORR 59% vs 44%, p = 0.004

  1. ABC advanced breast cancer, MBC metastatic breast cancer, ET endocrine therapy, AI aromatase inhibitor, NR not reached, PFS progression-free survival, OS overall survival, ORR objective response rate, DCR disease control rate, HR hazard ratio