Skip to main content

Table 3 Treatment options at progression of disease for indolent lymphoma

From: How we treat mature B-cell neoplasms (indolent B-cell lymphomas)

Drug

Histology

N

Follow-up (y)

Responseˆ†: PFS**, OS, ORR, CRR

Toxicities and comments

First relapse

 G versus R [192] (GAUSS)

FL (85%), Non-FL (15%)

175

2.5

G: 2yPFS 46%, ORR 44% (FL); CRR NS

R: 2yPFS 50%, ORR 33% (FL); CRR NS

SAEs: 26 patients (15% each arm), majority infusion-related

 R2 versus R-placebo [110] (AUGMENT)

FL (82%), MZL

358

2.5

R2: PFS 3y, ORR 78%, CRR 34%

R-placebo: PFS 1y, ORR 53%, CRR 18%

*MZL: PFS difference NS

OS: data maturing

R2 AE: G3–4 neutropenia 50%; infxn 63%, cutaneous 32%

R-placebo AE: G3–4 neutropenia 13%, infxn 49%, cutaneous 12%

 BR versus G + B [242] (GADOLIN)

FL (80–82%), MZL, SLL, WM

413

2

G + B: PFS NR

B: PFS 15 m

OS and ORR: NS

G + B: G3–5 AEs 68%

B: G3–5 AEs 62%

(neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, infusion reaction)

Multiply relapsed

 BR versus fludarabine + R (FR) [193]

FL, LPL, SLL, MZL, MCL

230

8

BR: PFS 34 m, ORR 82%, CRR 40%

FR: PFS 12 m, ORR 51%, CRR 17%

SAEs: 46 total (23 each group); myelosuppression, infection

PI3K3-inhbitors

 Idelalisib [197] (PI3Kδ-inhibitor)

FL (59%), SLL, MZL, LPL

64

NA

PFS 8 m, ORR 47%, DOR 18 m

TTR: 1 m

AEs: infection; monitor CMV, pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis

 Copanlisib [196] (CHRONOS-1)

FL (73%), MZL, SLL, LPL-WM, DLBCL (1%)

142

NA

PFS 11 m, OS NR, ORR 59%, CRR 15%

AEs: hyperglycemia (50%), diarrhea (35%), fatigue (30%), hypertension (30%), neutropenia (29%), fever (25%)

SAEs: lung infection (13%), hyperglycemia (5%), decreased neutrophil count (4%), fever (3%), and diarrhea (2%), pneumonitis (8%)

*25% discontinuation, 37% dose reduction, 74% interruptions

 Duvelisib [195] (DYNAMO)

FL (64.3%), SLL, MZL

129

3

PFS 10 m, ORR 47% (most PR, 2 patients CR)

AEs: diarrhea (49%), nausea (30%), neutropenia (29%), fatigue (28%), cough (27%); 19% dose reduction, 66% interruption, 31% discontinued

BTK inhibitors

 Ibrutinib [204]

MZL

63

1.5

PFS 14 m, 18mOS‡ 81%, ORR 48%

TTR 4.5 m, best response 5 m

62% discontinued treatment

Pseudoprogression in 2 patients

 Ibrutinib-R versus placebo-R [111]

WM (1st line and relapse)

150

2

Ibrutinib-R: 30mPFS 82%, MRR 72%

Ibrutinib-R G3–5 AEs: afib 12%, HTN 13%; IgM flare 8%, infusion rxn 1%

Response independent of MYD88 or CXCR4 genotype

Other novel agents: BCL-2 and EZH2 inhibitors

 Venetoclax [210] (BCL-2 inhibitor)

WM

31

NA

2y PFS 76%, ORR 87%, VGPR 19%, PR 61%, TTR 2 m

AEs: G4 neutropenia (n = 5), G3 neutropenia (n = 15), G3 anemia (n = 4), diarrhea (n = 4)

 Tazemetostat [213] (EZH2 inhibitor)

FL

99

NA

MT EZH2: PFS 14 m, ORR 77%

WT EZH2: PFS 11 m, ORR 34%

AEs: G ≥ 3 17% (all patients), most frequent thrombocytopenia (3%), anemia (2%), asthenia (2%), vomiting (1%), fatigue (1%), no G5 AE

Antibodies, antibody–drug conjugates (ADC) and bispecific T cell engagers (BiTE)

 R-Polatuzumab vedotin [216] (CD79b-directed AB-drug conjugate)

FL

20

NA

PFS 15 m, ORR 70%, CRR 45%

G3–5 AEs (50%): neutropenia (15%), diarrhea (10%); one G5 event

 Mosunetuzumab [217] (bispecific Ab targeting CD3, and CD20)

FL

69

NA

ORR 64%, CRR 44%

CRS: 28.4% (FL and aggressive NHL), most G1–2

G3 CRS: 1.4%, most CRS in cycle 1

Magrolimab (anti-CD47 Ab)

FL (35%), MZL (2%), DLBCL (63%)

100

1–1.5

ORR 61%, CRR 24%

TTR 2 m

DOR NR

AEs: infusion reactions (38%), headache (34%), chills (30%), fatigue (30%), anemia (27%), nausea (24%), pyrexia (23%) vomiting (13%), back pain (11%); majority G1/2 except G3 anemia (15%)

Auto/allo HSCT and CAR-T

 HDT/ASCT versus no transplant [221]

FL

162

11

ASCT: 5y PFS 51%, OS 77%

No transplant: 5y PFS 19%, OS 59%

*Among patients without cytoreduction failure, PFS not significantly different; second-line PFS is reported for patients with POD24

 Allo-SCT (MSD or MUD) versus ASCT [222]

FL (R/R)

440

6

ASCT: 5yPFS 38%, 5yOS 70%

MSD: 5yPFS 52%, 5yOS 73%

MUD: 5yPFS 43%, 5yOS 49%

*After 6 m, MSD/MUD PFS > ASCT PFS

ASCT: 5y NRM 5%

MSD: 5y NRM 17%

MUD: 5y NRM 33%

 Axicabtagene ciloleucel [237] (CD19-CAR T) (ZUMA-5)

FL, MZL

94

11.5 m

PFS 23.5 m, OS NR, 12mOS 94%, ORR 94% (79% CR): FL ORR 95% (80% CR), MZL ORR 86% (71% CR)

Grade ≥ 3 AEs 83%: neutropenia (33%) and anemia (28%); grade ≥ 3 CRS: 11%; grade ≥ 3 neurologic events: 19%

Median time to CRS: 4d; Median time neurotoxicity: 7d

  1. This table outlines the standard chemoimmunotherapy regimens and novel agents that have efficacy in relapsed or refractory indolent lymphomas. Several of the novel therapies demonstrate excellent response rates with unique toxicity profiles
  2. Ab antibody, AEs adverse events, afib atrial fibrillation, allo-SCT allogeneic stem cell transplant, ASCT autologous stem cell transplant, B bendamustine, BM bone marrow biopsy, BR bendamustine, rituximab, CAR T chimeric antigen receptor T cell, CIT chemoimmunotherapy, CRR complete response rate, DOR duration of response, EFS event-free survival, FL follicular lymphoma, G obinutuzumab, G3–4/5 grade 3–4/5 toxicities or adverse events, HDT high-dose chemotherapy, HT histologic transformation, HTN hypertension, LPL lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, m months, MCL mantle cell lymphoma, MRR major response rate, MSD matched sibling donor, MT EZH2 mutant enhancer of zeste homologue 2, MUD matched unrelated donor, MZL marginal zone lymphoma, NA not available, NR not reached, NRM nonrelapse mortality, NS no significant difference between groups, ORR overall response rate, OS overall survival, PFS** progression-free survival, POD24 progression of disease within 24 months of diagnosis, R-CHOP rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, R-CVP rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, R2 rituximab, lenalidomide, R rituximab, RR retreatment rituximab, SAE serious adverse events (fatal or life-threatening events that cause or prolong in-patient hospitalization or substantial disability), TTR time to response, WT EZH2 wild type enhancer of zeste homologue 2, WW watchful waiting, y year
  3. **PFS that gives time in months or years = median PFS
  4. ˆStatistically significant difference between groups unless reported as NS
  5. †If not listed, then the outcome was not reported in the original study
  6. ‡Estimated