Table 3 Summary of ORR and CRR comparisons between the TRANSCEND and ZUMA-1 studies
| Â | ZUMA-1 (axi-cel) | TRANSCEND (liso-cel) | Liso-cel versus axi-cel | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N (%) | Response rate, % | N/ESS | Response rate, % | OR (95% CI) | P | |
ORR | ||||||
 Naïve comparison | 101 | 74.3 | 256 | 72.7 | 0.92 (0.54–1.55) | 0.753 |
 Initial analysis |  |  | 42.1 | 80.1 | 1.40 (0.56–3.49) | 0.476 |
 Sensitivity analysis 1 |  |  | 150.3 | 71.2 | 0.85 (0.48–1.52) | 0.591 |
 Sensitivity analysis 2 |  |  | 98.9 | 70.9 | 0.84 (0.45–1.58) | 0.596 |
CRR | ||||||
 Naïve comparison | 101 | 54.5 | 256 | 53.1 | 0.95 (0.60–1.50) | 0.815 |
 Initial analysis |  |  | 39.6 | 59.2 | 1.21 (0.56–2.64) | 0.630 |
 Sensitivity analysis 1 |  |  | 169.1 | 48.2 | 0.78 (0.47–1.27) | 0.318 |
 Sensitivity analysis 2 |  |  | 98.9 | 49.5 | 0.82 (0.47–1.43) | 0.483 |