Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

From: Evidence-based expert consensus on the management of primary central nervous system lymphoma in China

Grade

Content

Quality of evidence

High (A)

We are very confident that the actual effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect

Moderate (B)

We are moderately confident of the effect estimate: The actual effect is likely to be close to the evaluation of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different

Low (C)

Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the evaluation of the effect

Very low (D)

We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

Strength of recommendations

Strong (1)

Clearly shows the benefits of intervention outweigh the harms or more harms than benefits

Weak (2)

Uncertain about the benefits and harms or the benefits and harms are tantamount regardless of the quality of evidence