Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of clinical efficacy and future prospects in CAR T cell versus CAR NK cell cancer immunotherapya,b

From: Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy

Parameter

CAR T

Primary CAR NK

CAR NK-92

Source

PB

PB or UCB

Cell line

Need for in vitro expansion before infusion

Yes

Yes

No

Pre-activation and differentiation

Needs CD3/CD28 stimulation

Requires feeder cells and/or IL-2 or other cytokines for optimal growth

Requires IL-2 for optimal growth

Viral transduction efficiency

Variable

Variable

High transduction efficiency

Side effects

   

 Neurotoxicity

Yes (reported in 58–87% of the patients in the Kymriah and Yescarta clinical trials)

No

No

 CRS

Yes (reported in 74–94% of the patients in the Kymriah and Yescarta clinical trials)

No

No

 Long-term side effects

Yes, CAR T cells can persist in circulation for years

Limited in vivo survival without IL-15 and persistent growth for over a year with incorporated IL-15

Short persistence, the cell line needs to be irradiated prior to infusion

Killing activity

Kills only tumor cells carrying TAA in an MHC-independent manner; produces slow response

Kills tumor cells regardless of their MHC status with some preference in killing tumor cells lacking MHC-I; quick response without prior activation

Similar to primary CAR NK

ADCC activity

No

Yes, due to CD16 expression

Similar to primary CAR NK when NK-92 CAR NK cells are transduced with CD16

Prospects for clinical use

Impressive clinical outcomes have already been reported; CAR T treatment has been approved by the FDA (Kymriah for ALL and Kymriah and Yescarta for DLBCL [51]

Being developed and promising

Being developed and combined with other agents

"Serial" killing ability

Yes

Yes, one NK cell can kill up to 5 tumor cells [220]

Unknown because cells  are irradiated before infusion

Production efficiency

Low; needs to be prepared individually for each patient and requires coordination between production facility and clinica

High due to donor availability and the off-the-shelf potential

High; unlimited expansion potential of the cell line

Cost of treatment

Expensive; approximately $373,000 USD [221]

Relatively less expensive due to off-the-shelf potential

Relatively less expensive than CAR T and primary CAR NK cells due to unlimited expansion potential

Potential for production of "off-the-shelf" anti-cancer products

Low to moderate; TCR knock-out studies are ongoing, but disabling TCR may lower T cell activity and/or survival and may be technically challenging

High; UCB NK cells may have better survival rates than PB NK cells after thawing or infusion

Very high; unlimited expansion potential

  1. a10% of the patients died or were dropped and 80% needed bridge chemotherapy while waiting for the CAR T cell product during Kymriah and Yescarta clinical trials, complicating interpretation of the results [51]. This table has been partially adopted from Kurlander (2017), O’Leary (2017) [49, 51], and Klingemann (2014) [65]
  2. bDLBCL diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, PB peripheral blood, UCB umbilical cord blood