Skip to main content

Table 2 Key studies of FLT3 inhibitors as maintenance therapy in AML patients after allo-HSCT

From: Maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

References

Study design

Patients, N

Flt3 inhibitors, maintenance duration

Relapse

Survival

Chen [29]

Phase I

22 FLT3-ITD AML

Sorafenib, 12 months

3/22 (13.6%)

1-year OS: 95%; 1-year LFS: 85%

Brunner [30]

Retrospective, 2 arms

81 FLT3-ITD AML (Sorafenib: 26; Control: 55)

Sorafenib, median duration of 336.5 (19–1556) days

2-year CIR: 8.2% (Sorafenib) versus 37.7% (Control)

Sorafenib versus Control

2-year OS: 81% versus 62%; 2-year LFS: 82% versus 53%

Battipaglia [31]

Retrospective, single arm

27 FLT3-mutated AML (25 FLT3- ITD, 2 FLT3-TKD)

Sorafenib, median duration of 8.4 (0.2–46) months

3/27 (11.1%)

2-year OS: 80% ± 8%

2-year LFS: 73% ± 9%

Xuan [25]

Retrospective, 2 arms

144 FLT3-ITD AML (Sorafenib: 58; Control: 86)

Sorafenib, median duration of 146 (51–240) days

3-year CIR: 17.3% (Sorafenib) versus 34.2% (Control)

Sorafenib versus Control

3-year OS: 81.3% versus 62.9%; 3-year LFS: 79.3% versus 52.1%

Bazarbachi [33]

Retrospective, EBMT registry-based analysis

462 FLT3-mutated AML (Sorafenib: 28; Control: 434)

Sorafenib, median duration of ≥ 12 months

2-year CIR of total 462 patients: 34%

Matched-pair analysis 26 sorafenib patients versus 26 controls: 2-year OS: 83% versus 62%; 2-year LFS: 79% versus 54%

Xuan [35]

Phase III RCT

202 FLT3-ITD AML (Sorafenib: 100; Control: 102)

Sorafenib was administered at 30–60-day post-transplantation and continued until day 180

Sorafenib versus Control

1-year CIR: 7.0% versus 24.5%; 2-year CIR: 11.9% versus 31.6%

Sorafenib versus Control

2-year OS: 82.1% versus 68.0%; 2-year LFS: 78.9% versus 56.6%

Burchert [36]

Phase II RCT (SORMAIN, terminated early due to slow accrual)

83 FLT3-ITD AML (Sorafenib: 43; Placebo: 40)

Sorafenib, 24 months

Sorafenib (8/43, 18.6%) versus Placebo (17/40, 42.5%)

Sorafenib versus Placebo

2-year OS: 90.5% versus 66.2%; 2-year LFS: 85.0% versus53.3%

Sandmaier [40]

Phase I

13 AML

Quizartinib (AC220), a maximum of 24 months

1/13 (7.7%)

NA

Maziarz [42]

Phase II RCT (the preliminary result)

60 FLT3-ITD AML (Midostaurin + SOC: 30; SOC: 30)

Midostaurin, 12 months

18-month estimated relapse rate: 11% (Midostaurin + SOC) versus 24% (SOC)

18-month LFS: 89% (Midostaurin + SOC) versus 76% (SOC)

Levis [43]

Phase III RCT (Ongoing, NCT02997202)

346 FLT3-ITD AML (target number, Gilteritinib: 173; Placebo: 173)

Gilteritinib, 2 years

NA

NA

  1. Ref reference, N number, FLT3-ITD FLT3 internal tandem duplication, OS overall survival, LFS leukemia-free survival, CIR cumulative incidence of relapse, FLT3-TKD FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain, EBMT European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, RCT randomized controlled trial, NA not available, SOC standard of care