From: Gastric cancer treatment: recent progress and future perspectives
Therapy line | Trial | Stage | Experimental arm | Control arm | Primary endpoints | Result (Experimental vs. Control) | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perioperative chemotherapy | MAGIC | Stage II or higher | 3 × ECF → Surgery → 3 × ECF | Surgery | OS | PFS: HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.53–0.81; P < 0.001; 5-year OS: 36% vs. 23% (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60–0.93; P = 0.009) | [19] | |
 | FNCLCC & FFCD | Resectable | 2–3 × CF → Surgery → 3–4 × CF | Surgery | OS | 5-year DFS: 34% v 19% (HR, 0.65; 95% CI 0.48 -0.89; P = 0.003) 5-year OS: 38% v 24% (HR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.50 -0.95; P = 0.02) | [20] | |
 | FLOT4-AIO | cT2 or higher or N +  | 4 × FLOT → Surgery → 4 × FLOT | 3 × ECF/ECX → Surgery → 3 × ECF/ECX | OS | PFS: 30 vs. 18 months (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62–0.91; P = 0.0036); OS: 50 vs. 35 months (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.63–0.94; P = 0.012) | [21] | |
 | PRODIGY | cT2-3N + , or cT4Nany | 3 × DOS → Surgery → 8 × S-1 | Surgery → S-1 | PFS | 3-year PFS: 66.3% vs. 60.2% (HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52–0.95; P = 0.023); 3-year OS: 74.2% vs. 73.4% (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60–1.19; P = 0.338) | [22] | |
 | RESOLVE | cT4aN + or cT4bNany | Arm C: 3 × SOX → Surgery → 5 × SOX → 3 × S-1 | Arm A: Surgery → 8 × CAPOX | DFS | 3-year DFS: 59.4% vs. 51.1% (HR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61–0.97; P = 0.028) | [24] | |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | ACTS-GC | Stage II or III | Surgery → S-1 for 1 year | Surgery | OS | 5-year OS: 71.7% vs. 61.1% (HR 0.669; 95% CI, 0.540 to 0.828) | [27] | |
 | CLASSIC | Stage II-IIIB | Surgery → 8 × CAPOX | Surgery | DFS | 5-year DFS: 68% vs. 53% (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.72; P < 0.0001) 5-year OS: 78% vs. 69% (HR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.85; P = 0.0015) | ||
 | JACCRO GC-07 | Stage III | Surgery → 1 × S-1 → 7 × Docetaxel plus S-1 → S-1 for 1 year | Surgery → S-1 for 1 year | RFS | 3-year RFS: 66% vs. 50% (HR 0.632; 99.99% CI, 0.400 to 0.998; P < 0.001) | [23] | |
 | RESOLVE | cT4aN + or cT4bNany | Arm B: Surgery → 8 × SOX | Arm A: Surgery → 8 × CAPOX | DFS | 3-year DFS: 56.5% vs. 51.1% (HR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.07; P = 0.17) | [24] |