Skip to main content

Table 3 Ongoing clinical trials targeting TAMCs

From: Tumor-associated myeloid cells in cancer immunotherapy

Strategies

Class

Treatment

Conditions

With ICBs or not

Outcomes

Adverse effects

Blocking expansion and recruitment of TAMCs

CCR2 inhibitor

PF-04136309, MLN1202, BMS-813160, etc

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, melanoma, metastatic cancer, etc

Both monotherapy and synergistic ICBs are available

ORR was 16.7–49%. About 33% of patients had reduced metastasis markers. But some trials have been stopped for lack of clinical benefit

Fatigue and anemia were common. DLTs were present. Neutropenia may occur with concurrent chemotherapy

VEGFR inhibitor

Axitinib, Cabozantinib, Pazopanib, etc

Renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, small cell lung cancer, etc

Both monotherapy and synergistic ICBs are available

OS and PFS were significantly prolonged, and ORR was increased

The incidence rate of serious AEs was about 40%. The most common AE was diarrhea

CSF1R inhibitor

Cabiralizumab, PLX3397, ARRY-382, etc

Advanced solid tumor, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, etc

Mostly in collaboration with ICBs

The objective response rate was 0–16.7%. PFS did not prolong significantly

The incidence rate of serious AEs and DLTs was 0–54.5%. Gastrointestinal diseases were common

Mitigating the immunosuppressive ability of TAMCs

COX-2 inhibitor

Celecoxib, apricoxib, etc

Breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, etc

Collaboration with ICBs is rare

PFS did not significantly prolong or even shorten. There was no clinical benefit

The incidence rate of serious AEs was similar to that of placebo group

PDE5 inhibitor

Tadalafil, Sildenafil, etc

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, prostatic neoplasms, etc

No

The activity of Arg-1 and iNOS was significantly decreased, reversing tumor specific immune suppression

No AEs are reported

TLR agonist

CMP-001, Imiquimod, SD-101, etc

Melanoma, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, etc

Mostly in collaboration with ICBs

ORR was 0–55.6%, and progressive disease accounted for 11.1–44.4%. MPR also showed a mix of good and bad outcomes

The incidence rate of serious AEs was 16.67–44.4%. Chills and fatigue were prominent

Direct depletion

VEGFR inhibitor

Sunitinib malate, ZD6474, Apatinib, etc

Renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, etc

Both monotherapy and synergistic ICBs are available

PFS and OS were prolonged in most trials. Some studies have shown that MDSC mediated immunosuppression is reversed

The incidence rate of serious AEs was 6.67–40%. Leukocytes and platelets were often affected

C-kit inhibitor

Imatinib, Masitinib, Dasatinib, Dovitinib, etc

Salivary gland neoplasm, non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, thyroid cancer, etc

Collaboration with ICBs is rare

Clinical benefit was limited. PFS was prolonged in some trials, but the results of some trials were mainly progressive disease

The incidence rate of serious AEs was 2.44–65%. Among them, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting were easy to occur

Chemo therapy

Cisplatin, 5-FU, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Doxorubicin, etc

Esophageal neoplasms, breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, sarcoma, etc

Both monotherapy and synergistic ICBs are available

Effectiveness varies greatly depending on tumor type, drug dose, combination therapy, etc. Both trials with significant clinical benefit and trials with low ORR exist

Nausea, constipation and diarrhea were prominent in AEs. The hematopoietic system such as neutrophils and platelets were susceptible

  1. ORR objective response rate, DLT dose limiting toxicities, OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival, AE adverse event, MPR major pathologic response