From: Genitourinary cancers updates: highlights from ASCO 2023
Reference number | Phase | Intervention | n | Population | ORR | mPFS | mOS | Safety |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[17] EV103 | 1b/2 | Enfortumab vedotin + Pembrolizumab | 45 | Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were cisplatin ineligible | 73.3% (58.1–85.4) | 12.7 mos | 26.1 mos | 64.4% with Grade III toxicity, primarily elevated lipase, maculo-papular rash, and fatigue |
[18] THOR | 3 | Erdafitinib versus chemotherapy (investigator’s choice) in patients with FGFRalt | 266 | Patients with urothelial carcinoma with FGFRalt on 2nd or 3rd line therapy | 45.6 versus 11.5 | 5.6 versus 2.7 | 12.1 versus 7.8 mos | Serious treatment-related events 13% with Erdafitinib versus 24% in chemotherapy arm |
[19] Norse | 2 | Erdafitinib compared to Erdafitinib + Cetrelimab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma with presence of FGFRalt | 87 | Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with FGFRalt and are cisplatin ineligible | 54.5% in combination versus 44.2% in ERDA alone | 10.97 mos versus 5.62 mos | - | 1 death in combination group from pulmonary failure, otherwise no added toxicity with addition of Cetrelimab to ERDA |