Skip to main content
Download PDF

New clinical developments in histone deacetylase inhibitors for epigenetic therapy of cancer

Journal of Hematology & Oncology volume 2, Article number: 22 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

DNA methylation and histone acetylation are two well known epigenetic chromatin modifications. Epigenetic agents leading to DNA hypomethylation and histone hyperacetylation have been approved for treatment of hematological disorders. The first histone deacetylase inhibitor, vorinostat, has been licensed for cutaneous T cell lymphoma treatment. More than 11 new epigenetic agents are in various stages of clinical development for therapy of multiple cancer types. In this review we summarize novel histone deacetylase inhibitors and new regimens from clinical trials for epigenetic therapy of cancer.

Introduction

DNA methylation and histone acetylation are two most studied epigenetic modifications, although ethyl, acetyl, phosphoryl, and other modifications of histones have been described [1, 2]. Histone acetylation and methylation have been studied extensively in carcinogenesis [3]. Histone acetylases (HATs), histone deacetylases (HDACs), histone lysine methyltransferases (HMTs), and histone demethylases are key enzymes involved in epigenetic regulation and chromatin remodeling. Coordinated DNA methylation and histone modification play a key role in the control of gene expression [2]. Vorinostat (Zolinza, Merck) is the first HDAC inhibitor that has been licensed for clinical use [4–10]. More than 11 HDAC inhibitors are in clinical development. In this review we summarize novel HDAC inhibitors and new regimens from clinical trials for epigenetic therapy of cancer.

Vorinostat (SAHA, Zolinza)

Eighteen enzymes from HDAC family have been identified in human [4, 11–14]. Voriniostat (formerly, suberoylanilide hydroxamine, SAHA) is a pan-HDAC inhibitor [4, 14]. SAHA has significant anti-cancer activity in a wide range of cancers [4, 14–17]. Vorinostat (VOR) was studied in a phase II trial for patients with refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) [4, 15–18]. 33 patients who have failed a median of 5 prior therapies were enrolled. Similar to other epigenetic agents, time to response to SAHA was 11.9 weeks. SAHA is well tolerated orally with common toxicities including fatigue, thrombocytopenia, nausea and diarrhea. 200 mg BID orally has the most favorable safety and efficacy profile [4, 15–18]. A separate phase IIb trial which included 74 patients with refractory or persistent CTCL confirmed the activity of VOR [19, 20]. 32% of the patients also had pruritus symptom relief. Pulmonary embolism was reported in 5% of the patients. VOR has been approved for treatment of refractory CTCL (Zolinza, Merck). Since then there have been more than 30 trials testing VOR in single agent or in combination (Table 1 and 2). In an analysis reported at the American society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2008 annual meeting, 476 patients received VOR either as single agent or combined with another agent [21]. More than half of those patients had fatigue, nausea and diarrhea. Dose modifications were not required nevertheless in the majority of the patients.

Table 1 Vorinostat in single agent trials
Full size table
Table 2 Vorinostat in combination trials
Full size table

In a multicenter phase II single agent study, 16 patients with breast, colon and lung cancers received VOR at doses of 200, 300, and 400 mg BID for 14 days out of every 3 weeks. Disease stabilization was observed in half of the patients, but there were no confirmed responses [22].

In a single agent phase I study of VOR for patients with recurrent diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 2 of the 18 enrolled patients had response, the other 16 had disease progression [23]. 300 mg BID 3 days/week was well tolerated but with limited activity.

Single agent VOR was also investigated in a phase I study for patients with leukemia and myelodysplasia (MDS) [24]. Thirty one of the 41 patients enrolled had acute myeloid leukemia (AML). VOR was given twice or thrice daily for 14 days with dose range of 100–300 mg in a 21-day cycle. The Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was 200 mg BID. Seven patients had hematological improvement, including 4 AML with complete responses. Increased histone acetylation was seen at all dose levels.

VOR was combined with bortezomib in a phase I trial for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) [25]. The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was QT prolongation and fatigue. The MTD was VOR 400 mg on days 4–11 and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on day 1, 4, 8, 11.

In a phase I trial for Japanese patients with gastrointestinal cancer, DLT of single agent VOR was grade 4 thrombocytopenia [26]. In this group of 16 Japanese patients, 300 mg BID for 3 consecutive days followed by a 4-day rest each week was the tolerable regimen.

In a small phase I study of patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma, VOR 200 mg BID × 14 days was combined with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on a 21-day cycle [27]. Eight patients were enrolled. Severe thrombocytopenia was the DLT at the above dosing schedules (MTD). Phase II study is underway.

In a preliminary report of a phase I dose-escalating trial of VOR plus bexarotene for advanced CTCL, 19 patients were included [28]. MTD was not reached yet. 1 patient had a CR, 3 had a PR, and 12 had stable disease.

HDAC inhibitors have been reported to restore hormone sensitivity of estrogen and progesterone receptors [29–31]. VOR 400 mg daily × 3 weeks was combined with daily tamoxifen in a 4-week cycle for patients with hormone-refractory breast cancer [32]. 17 of the 19 enrolled patients were evaluable. Four patients had objective response, one of them was in CR. H3 and H4 histone acetylation was seen at day 8. These findings imply that VOR may restore hormone sensitivity in hormone-refractory breast cancer patients.

VOR was investigated in combination with capecitabine (CAP) in a phase I/II trial for patients with advanced solid tumors [33]. Twenty eight patients were in phase I, 14 patients were in phase II. The phase II regimen was VOR 300 mg daily plus CAP 1000 mg BID × 14 days per 21 day cycle. Preliminary results appeared to be encouraging.

In another phase I trial for patients with advanced solid tumors, VOR was combined with carboplatin (AUC = 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) [34]. VOR was given as 400 mg daily × 14 days or 300 mg BID × 7 days in a 3-week cycle. Twenty five of the 28 patients enrolled were evaluable. The DLT was emesis and neutropenia. 11 patients had PR, 7 patients had stable disease. Both VOR dosing schedule was well tolerated in combination.

Advanced mesothelioma progressed after first-line chemotherapy has poor prognosis. thirteen such patients were included in a single agent phase I trial [35]. Two patients had a partial response. This was considered to be promising for these poor-prognostic patients. A randomized phase III trial of oral VOR for patients with advanced mesothelioma are underway.

VOR 200 mg BID was also evaluated in a single agent phase II study for patients with recurrent/metastatic transitional cell carcinoma who failed platinum therapy [36]. Fourteen patients were included in the report at ASCO 2008 meeting. Two early on-study death was reported, and the study was closed to further accrual.

Single agent VOR at 400 mg daily had disappointing results in a phase II study for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma [37]. VOR is also being studied in several phase I studies with a variety of regimens including gemcitabine/cisplatin for lung cancer, 13 cis-retinoic acid for children with solid tumors (Table 1 and 2) [38, 39]. Final results are awaited. Single agent VOR for solid tumors and MM was overall disappointing in early clinical trials [22, 37, 40, 41].

New HDAC inhibitors

HDAC inhibitors generally consist of three parts in the chemical structure: (1) a zinc-chelating group; (2) a spacer group, which is generally hydrophobic; and (3) an "enzyme binding" group that confers specificity and is generally aromatic in character [42]. A spectrum of naturally occurring or synthetic HDAC inhibitors have been characterized for their antitumor activities in preclinical studies [43]. Six major classes of HDAC inhibitors have been defined on the chemical structures [44]. These include short-chain fatty acids (butyrate and valproic acid), hydroxamates (SAHA, trichostatin A, ITF2357, LBH589, oxamflatin, PCI-24781, and PXD101), benzamides (MS-275, CI-994, and MGCD-0103), cyclic tetrapeptides (depsipeptide, trapoxin A, and apicidin), electrophilic ketones (trifluoromethylketone), and miscellaneous (depudecin, SNDX-275, and isothiocyanates). In addition to vorinostat which has been approved for clinical treatment of advanced CTCL, there are at least 11 more HDAC inhibitors in various stages of clinical development (Table 3).

Table 3 New HDAC inhibitors in clinical trials
Full size table

1. CI-994 (N-acetyldinaline, [4-(acetylamino)-N-(2-amino-phenyl) benzamide])

CI-994 is an orally active HDAC inhibitor that belongs to the benzamide class [45]. A phase I/II study was carried out in patients with solid tumors. Fifty three patients received CI-994 orally for 2–10 weeks [46]. Thrombocytopenia was the DLT. The MTD was 8 mg/m2/day for 8 weeks. One refractory lung cancer patient had PR for over 2 years, 3 additional patients had stable disease.

CI-994 was investigated in combination with gemcitabine in a phase I trial for solid tumors [47]. Twenty patients were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15). CI-994 was given orally in a dose-escalating schedule from 2–8 mg/m2/day in a 21-day cycle. The DLT was thrombocytopenia, and the MTD was 6 mg/m2 for combination with gemcitabine. CI-994 was also studied in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in a phase I trial in patients with advanced solid tumors [48]. CI-994 dose ranged 4–6 mg/m2 for one or two weeks. Thirty patients were enrolled. The MTD was 4 mg/m2 for 7 days for the combination regimen. CI-994 was evaluated in another phase I trial in combination with capecitabine [49, 50]. Fifty four patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. CI-994 was given in a dose-escalating schedule from 4–6 mg/m2 daily. The DLT was thrombocytopenia. The MTD was 6 mg/m2 daily for two weeks in a 21-day cycle in combination with capecitabine.

2. FK228 (FR901228, depsipeptide, romidepsin)

FK 228 is a potent bicyclic depsipeptide and a novel HDAC inhibitor [51, 52].

FK228 was studied in combination with gemcitabine in a phase I trial for patients with advanced solid tumors [53]. Thirty three patients were included in the report. Non-hematologic toxicities have been mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The recommended phase II dose schedule is FK228 (romidepsin) 12 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 every other week.

HDAC inhibitors restore expression of the sodium iodine symporter in refractory cells and sensitivity to RAI in vitro. A phase I trial was conducted for patients with thyroid and other advanced cancers using FK228 (romidepsin) on days 1, 3, 5 [54]. Twenty six patients were enrolled. Severe adverse events were hematologic and GI toxicities. The MTD is 9 mg/m2. Histone acetylation was shown to have a greater than 2-fold increase. This study was planned to focus exclusively on non-medullary thyroid cancer.

FK228 (depsipeptide) was also evaluated in a phase II study for patients with high risk MDS and AML [55]. FK228 was given on day 1 and day 8 to 12 patients at 18 mg/m2 over a 4-hour infusion every 3 weeks. There was one CR, six stable diseases. Histone H3 and H4 acetylation was seen, but there was no consistent changes.

Another phase II trial of FK228 was done in patients with refractory lung cancer [56]. Nineteen patients were treated on day 1 and 7 every 3 weeks at a dose of 17.8 mg/m2. Hematologic toxicity was dose-limiting in one patient, no objective responses were observed in this single agent study.

In another single-agent phase II trial, FK228 was given to patients with refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma at 13 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle [57]. Twenty nine patients were enrolled. Four patients had severe cardiac toxicity with one sudden death. There was only a 7% overall response rate. The study was closed due to insufficient efficacy. In a separate study with detailed monitoring of cardiac toxicities in 42 patients with T-cell lymphoma, Fk228 was given at 14 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle [58]. FK228 was not found to be associated with myocardial damage or decrease in cardiac function even though EKG changes with T-wave flattening or ST-segment depression were observed. The cardiac toxicities are believed to be a class effect of HDAC inhibitors.

3. ITF2357

ITF2357 is an orally effective member of hydroxamic family of HDAC inhibitors and can reduce production of inflammatory cytokines [59]. ITF2357 was investigated in an Italian phase II trial on patients with heavily pretreated refractory Hodgkin's disease [60]. ITF2357 was given at 100 mg PO daily. Fifteen patients were enrolled, 13 were evaluable for responses. Stable diseases were seen in seven (54%) patients. 20% of the patients had QTc interval prolongation prompting transient drug discontinuation. Overall it was reported to be well tolerated.

A phase II study reported at ASH 2007 annual meeting administered 150 mg or 100 mg of ITF2357 orally every 12 hours for four consecutive days followed by a 3 day rest every week of a 28-day cycle [61]. Sixteen patients with refractory MM were treated. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were GI side effects, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Three patients had abnormal EKG changes. One patient achieved partial response, and five others had stable diseases.

4. LBH589 (panobinostat)

LBH589 is a novel pan-HDAC inhibitor. Treatment with LBH589 not only has been shown to induce acetylation of histones, induction of p21, cell cycle growth arrest, and apoptosis but also has been demonstrated to induce acetylation of HSP90 [62].

LBH589 IV formulation was investigated in a phase I trial for patients with refractory hematological malignancies [63]. LBH589 as a single agent was administered as a 30-minute i.v. infusion once daily on days 1 to 7 of a 21-day cycle. The doses ranged from 4.8 mg/m2 to 14 mg/m2. 15 patients were enrolled. The DLT was QTc prolongation at 14 mg/m2. A significant increase in acetylation of the H2B and H3 histones in the leukemic blast (CD34+) cells is consistent with LBH589 reaching its target. The study was halted due to safety concerns about QTc prolongation.

Oral LBH589 was studied alone and in combination with docetaxel and prednisone in castration-resistant prostate cancer [64]. 20 mg of oral LBH589 was administered on days 1, 3 and 5 for 2-week on and 1-week off schedule for LBH589 alone arm, 15 mg of LBH589 was given following the same schedule in the combination arm. Eight patients were enrolled into each arm. There was no apparent synergistic effect in the combination arm. Three patients achieved PR as the best responses. This study was closed and further clinical trials are being focused on IV formulation which produces higher peak concentration with comparable toxicity profile.

LBH589 was tested in a phase II trial in patients with CTCL [65]. LBH589 was administered orally at 20 mg on days 1, 3, and 5 weekly until disease progression. Patients with cardiovascular abnormalities or QTc>450 msec were excluded. Intensive ECG monitoring was performed. 40 patients have been enrolled in the report. Five patients achieved skin response including one complete skin response. Another patient with PD improved to PR after initial flaring of disease. There was no QTc>500 ms observed.

5. MGCD0103

MGCD0103 is a selective orally available benzamide HDAC inhibitor that targets HDAC 1, 2, 3 (class 1) and 11 (class 4) [66, 67]. It avoids the class 2 enzymes.

MGCD0103 was studied in a phase I trial for patients with advanced solid tumors. It was administered orally three-times-per-week for 2 of every 3 weeks [68]. The dose ranges were from 12.5 mg to 56 mg/m2 in 38 patients over 99 cycles. The DLT included fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The recommended phase II dose was 45 mg/m2/day. There was inhibition of HDAC activity and induction of acetylation of H3 histones by MGCD0103.

A separate phase 1 trial of oral MGCD0103 was conducted in patients with leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes [69]. MGCD0103 was administered orally 3 times weekly without interruption. Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 62 years (32–84 years) were enrolled at dose levels of 20–80 mg/m2. The DLT were similar to those reported from the previous study [68]. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 60 mg/m2. Three patients achieved a complete bone marrow response.

MGCD0103 was also evaluated in a phase I/II trial in combination with gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors [70]. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled (25 in phase I, 4 in phase II). Dose levels of MGCD0103 ranged between 50 and 110 mg. The MTD and recommended phase II dose was 90 mg. 2 of 5 pancreatic cancer patients achieved PR. Phase II at 90 mg MGCD0103 3 ×/week plus gemcitabine 100 mg/m2 weekly × 3 per 4-week cycle is ongoing for pancreatic cancer patients.

A phase II trial of oral MGCD0103 was conducted in patients with refractory large B-cell (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma [71]. Among 50 patients enrolled, 32 patients received 110 mg three times per week. The dose was reduced to 85 mg 3 ×/week afterwards. 1 CR and 3 PRs with a response rate of 23.5% were achieved in 17 patients with DLBCL. Inhibition of HDAC activity was seen in 13 of 18 patients evaluated. In a separate phase II study, patients with refractory Hodgkin lymphoma were enrolled for treatment with MGCD0103 [72]. Twenty three patients received 110 mg, 10 patients had 85 mg 3 ×/week in 4-week cycles. Most patients had failed prior autologous transplants. Among the 110 mg cohorts, 2 patients achieved CR, 6 achieved PR, for an overall response rate of 38%. The median time to response was 2 cycles. The 85 mg dose was better tolerated and further study at this dose level is ongoing.

6. MS-275 (MS-27–275; N-(2-aminophenyl)-4-[N-(pyridin-3-yl-methoxycarbonyl) aminomethyl] benzamide)

MS-275 is a novel synthetic benzamide derivative that has been shown to inhibit HDAC activity [73, 74]. A phase I dose-escalating study has been completed in patients with advanced acute leukemia [75]. Thirty eight patients were enrolled. The first 13 patients were treated with MS-275 initially once weekly × 2, repeated every 4 weeks from 4 to 8 mg/m2. The rest of the patients were treated once weekly × 4, repeated every 6 weeks from 8 to 10 mg/m2. The MTD was 8 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks in 6-week cycle. The DLTs included infections and neurologic toxicity manifesting as unsteady gait and somnolence. MS-275 induced H3 and H4 acetylation.

MS-275 was also investigated in patients with solid tumors in a phase I trial [76]. Twenty seven patients with advanced solid malignancies and lymphomas were treated on three dose schedules. MS-275 is well tolerated at doses up to 6 mg/m2 every other week or 4 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks. The DLTs were hypophosphatemia and asthenia on the weekly and twice-weekly dosing schedules; there was no dose-limiting toxicity on the every other week schedule. Four mg/m2 given weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days were recommended for phase II study.

A phase II trial was done on patients with refractory metastatic melanoma [77]. Twenty eight patients were randomized to receive MS-275 3 mg biweekly (days 1+15, arm A) or 7 mg weekly (days 1+8+15, arm B), in 4-week cycles. Nausea and hypophosphatemia were the most common toxicities. No objective response was reported. Stable disease was observed (29% in Arm A, 21% in Arm B). Single agent MS-275 appears to be ineffective in this population of patients.

7. PCI-24781 (CRA-024781)

PCI-24781 is a novel, broad spectrum hydroxamate-based inhibitor of HDAC that shows preclinical antitumor activity [78]. A phase I study was done in patients with solid tumors [49]. 15 patients were reported at the ASCO 2008 annual meeting. Intravenous and oral forms are both studied. Tubulin and histone acetylation were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Hematologic and GI toxicities were observed, and 1 patient had EKG changes. Acetylation levels increased at 1.5 hour post dose and sustained through 4 hours in all patients and up to 24 hours in 60% of the patients. PCI-24781 was well tolerated following IV administration. Further study of oral formulation is ongoing.

8. Phenylbutyrate

Phenylbutyrate (PBA) is an aromatic short-chain fatty acid that has activity in HDAC inhibition [79]. Phase I clinical studies have been done [80–82]. Oral PBA was evaluated in a phase I trial [82]. Twenty eight patients with refractory solid tumors were included. Five dose levels (9 gm/day to 36 gm/day in three divided doses) were studied. The DLTs were nausea, vomiting and hypocalcemia at 36 gm/day. 27 gm/day was the recommended phase II dose. PBA was administered intravenously as 120-hour infusion in 24 patients with solid tumors in a separate phase I trial [81]. Six dose levels were studied (150 mg to 515 mg/kg/day in 21-day cycles). The DLTs were mainly neurological, such as somnolence and confusion. The MTD was 410 mg/kg/day for 5 days. Another phase I trial evaluated twice-daily PBA infusions for two consecutive weeks every month at five doses levels (60 mg -360 mg/kg/day) in patients with advanced solid tumors [80]. The MTD was 300 mg/kg/day.

PBA was also studied in combination with 5-fluouracil (FU) in a phase I trial. FU (24-hour continuous intravenous infusion (CIV)) with dose escalation (2–2.3 g/m2), in combination with PB (120 hour CIV at fixed dose 410 mg/kg/d × 5) was administered weekly in patients with advanced colorectal cancer [83]. Nine patients were enrolled. MTD has not been reached at the time of report. PBA was also combined with azacitidine in a phase II trial for patients with AML and MDS [84] (see above under section of azacitidine).

9. PXD101 (belinostat)

PXD101 is a novel hydroxamate-type HDAC inhibitor [43, 85]. A phase I trial of PXD101 was performed on patients with advanced solid tumors [86]. Forty six patients were enrolled. 6 dose levels were tested. The DLT were grade 3 fatigue. The MTD was determined to be 1000 mg/m2 IV infusion over 30 minutes daily for 5 days per 21-day cycle. Histone H4 hyperacetylation was observed after each infusion and was sustained for 4 to 24 hours in a dose-dependent manner. Of the patients treated at the MTD, 50% achieved stable disease.

Another phase I dose-finding study was done in patients with advanced hematological malignancies [87]. Sixteen patients were enrolled. Four dose levels were included. One patient developed drug-related grade 3 toxicities, including fatigue and neurological symptoms. The MTD was same as above and was to be used for phase II studies.

One phase II study of PXD101 was reported at 2008 ASCO annual meeting [88]. In this study, 30 patients with metastatic or recurrent and refractory ovarian cancer were enrolled. Eighteen out of the 30 patients had stable diseases. The study appears to be promising, and recruitment was still ongoing.

10. Valproic acid

Valproic acid (VPA, 2-propylpentanoic acid) is a well established drug for the therapy of epilepsy. It is teratogenic when administered during early pregnancy and can induce birth defects such as neural tube closure defects and other malformations. The well-tolerated antiepileptic drug was found to be a powerful HDAC inhibitor. VPA induces differentiation of carcinoma cells, transformed hematopoietic progenitor cells and leukemic blasts from acute myeloid leukemia patients [89].

VPA was studied in combination with All-trans retinoid acid (ATRA) in patients with AML who were not candidates for intensive chemotherapy [90]. Fifty eight patients were enrolled. Forty patients received the combination therapy. There was only 5% response rate for this group of patients with no CR observed. Another trial of VPA (5–10 mg/kg) plus ATRA (45 mg/m2) was done on 26 patients with poor-risk AML [91]. No patients achieved CR. These studies suggest that additional trials are needed to clearly define the activity of VPA in poor-risk AML patients.

A phase I trial of single agent VPA was reported in patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer [92]. Twelve patients were included. VPA doses ranged from 20 mg/kg to 40 mg/kg daily for 5 days. The most common side effect was depressed level of consciousness which was not severe. Tumor HDAC activity decreased in 8 patients. However, there was no correlation between H3 and H4 hyperacetylation with serum levels of VPA.

VPA was studied for IV administration in a phase I trial for patients with advanced cancer [93]. Twenty six patients were enrolled. VPA was administered as a 1-hour infusion daily for 5 consecutive days in a 21-day cycle with doses ranging between 30 mg/kg/day and 12 mg/kg/day. The MTD was 60 mg/kg/day. The DLT was grade 3 or 4 neurological impairment occurring in 8 out of 26 patients.

11. Other HDAC inhibitors in early stage of clinical development (Isothiocyanates, NVP-LAQ824, SNDX-275)

Isothiocyanates (ITC) can be found as thioglucoside conjugates, i.e. glucosinolates, in a wide variety of cruciferous vegetables including broccoli, cabbages, watercress, and Brussel's sprouts, etc. A phase I study of glucosinolate and ITCs (sulforaphane) were done in healthy volunteers [94]. The excretion of a metabolite, dithiocarbamates, was measured. No clinically significant toxicities were observed. Sulforaphane and phenylhexyl isothiocyanate (PHI) are among the synthetic isothiocyanates that are shown to be HDAC inhibitors and have antitumor activities in vitro and in vivo [95–100]. PHI was found recently to have dual epigenetic effects as both HDAC inhibitor and hypomethylating agent [97]. Clinical development of ITCs is underway.

NVP-LAQ824 ((2E)-N-hydroxy-3-[4-[[(2-hydroxyethyl)[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amino]methyl]phenyl]-2-propenamide) is a structurally novel hydroxamate derivative of HDAC inhibitors [101, 102]. It has broad antitumor activity in preclinical studies [103–106]. Clinical trials in human are currently underway.

SNDX-275 is another novel HDAC inhibitor and is currently undergoing a phase I trial in combination with azaciditine (see above under section of azacitidine).

There are more structurally novel HDAC inhibitors which have been shown to have preclinical antitumor activities [43]. Clinical developments are yet to be done.

Conclusion

Vorinostat is the first HDAC inhibitor that has been approved for treatment of CTCL. More than 11 HDAC inhibitors are in various stages of clinical development. HDAC inhibitors may have more potential in the combination therapy of a wide range of malignancies. Combination of novel epigenetic agents, including hypomethylating agents and HDAC inhibitors, and chemotherapeutic agents are being extensively investigated for clinical treatment of malignant disorders. Results from the clinical trials are eagerly awaited and being closed watched.

References

  1. Yoo CB, Jones PA: Epigenetic therapy of cancer: past, present and future. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006, 5: 37-50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hashimshony T, Zhang J, Keshet I, Bustin M, Cedar H: The role of DNA methylation in setting up chromatin structure during development. Nature Genet. 2003, 34: 187-192.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cang S, Liu DL: Clinical advances in hypomethylating agents for epigenetic therapy of cancer. Current Cancer Drug Targets submitted and under review. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marks PA: Discovery and development of SAHA as an anticancer agent. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 1351-1356.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marks PA, Dokmanovic M: Histone deacetylase inhibitors: discovery and development as anticancer agents. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2005, 14: 1497-1511.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu WS, Parmigiani RB, Marks PA: Histone deacetylase inhibitors: molecular mechanisms of action. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 5541-5552.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Silverman LR, Demakos EP, Peterson BL, Kornblith AB, Holland JC, Odchimar-Reissig R: Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: a study of the cancer and leukemia group B. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 2429-2440.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jabbour E, Issa JP, Garcia-Manero G, Kantarjian H: Evolution of decitabine development: accomplishments, ongoing investigations, and future strategies. Cancer. 2008, 112: 2341-2351.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kantarjian H, Issa JP, Rosenfeld CS, Bennett JM, Albitar M, DiPersio J: Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a phase III randomized study. Cancer. 2006, 106: 1794-1803.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kantarjian H, Oki Y, Garcia-Manero G, Huang X, O'brien S, Cortes J: Results of a randomized study of 3 schedules of low-dose decitabine in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2007, 109: 52-57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dokmanovic M, Marks PA: Prospects: histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Cell Biochem. 2005, 96: 293-304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dokmanovic M, Perez G, Xu W, Ngo L, Clarke C, Parmigiani RB: Histone deacetylase inhibitors selectively suppress expression of HDAC7. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6: 2525-2534.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dokmanovic M, Clarke C, Marks PA: Histone deacetylase inhibitors: overview and perspectives. Mol Cancer Res. 2007, 5: 981-989.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raj K, John A, Ho A, Chronis C, Khan S, Samuel J: CDKN2B methylation status and isolated chromosome 7 abnormalities predict responses to treatment with 5-azacytidine. Leukemia. 2007, 21: 1937-1944.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly WK, Richon VM, O'Connor O, Curley T, Gregor-Curtelli B, Tong W: Phase I clinical trial of histone deacetylase inhibitor: suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid administered intravenously. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 3578-3588.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelly WK, Marks PA: Drug insight: Histone deacetylase inhibitors – development of the new targeted anticancer agent suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005, 2: 150-157.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly WK, O'Connor OA, Krug LM, Chiao JH, Heaney M, Curley T: Phase I study of an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 3923-3931.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Duvic M, Talpur R, Ni X, Zhang C, Hazarika P, Kelly C: Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Blood. 2007, 109: 31-39.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Olsen EA, Kim YH, Kuzel TM, Pacheco TR, Foss FM, Parker S: Phase IIb multicenter trial of vorinostat in patients with persistent, progressive, or treatment refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 3109-3115.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Olsen EA, Duvic M, Breneman D, Pacheco TR, Parker S, Vonderheid EC: Vorinostat provides prolonged safety and clinical benefit to patients with advanced cutaneous t-cell lymphoma (CTCL). J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  21. Siegel DS, Hussein MA, Belani CP, Robert F, Rizvi S, Wigginton J: Safety and tolerability of vorinostat – Experience from the vorinostat clinical trial program. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vansteenkiste J, Van CE, Dumez H, Chen C, Ricker JL, Randolph SS: Early phase II trial of oral vorinostat in relapsed or refractory breast, colorectal, or non-small cell lung cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2008, 26: 483-488.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Crump M, Coiffier B, Jacobsen ED, Sun L, Ricker JL, Xie H: Phase II trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in relapsed diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2008, 19: 964-969.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia-Manero G, Yang H, Bueso-Ramos C, Ferrajoli A, Cortes J, Wierda WG: Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2008, 111: 1060-1066.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Badros AZ, Philip S, Niesvizk R, Goloubeva O, Harris C, Zweibel J: Phase I trial of vorinostat plus bortezomib (bort) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (mm) patients (pts). J Clin Oncol [Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol]. 2008, 26: abst # 8548. Ref Type: Journal (Full)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chin K, Hatake K, Hamaguchi T, Shirao K, Doi T, Noguchi K: A phase I study of vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in Japanese patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hammers HJ, Verheul H, Wilky B, Salumbides B, Holleran J, Egorin MJ: Phase I safety and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic results of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in combination with bevacizumab in patients with kidney cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hymes K, Dummer R, Sterry W, Steinhoff M, Assaf C, Kerl H: Phase I trial of oral vorinostat in combination with bexarotene in patients with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fan J, Yin WJ, Lu JS, Wang L, Wu J, Wu FY: ERalpha negative breast cancer cells restore response to endocrine therapy by combination treatment with both HDAC inhibitor and DNMT inhibitor. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008, 134: 883-890.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jang ER, Lim SJ, Lee ES, Jeong G, Kim TY, Bang YJ: The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A sensitizes estrogen receptor alpha-negative breast cancer cells to tamoxifen. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 1724-1736.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Keen JC, Yan L, Mack KM, Pettit C, Smith D, Sharma D: A novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, scriptaid, enhances expression of functional estrogen receptor alpha (ER) in ER negative human breast cancer cells in combination with 5-aza 2'-deoxycytidine. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003, 81: 177-186.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Munster PN, Lacevic M, Schmitt M, Bicaku E, Marchion D, Stephens A: Phase II trial of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor to restore the hormone sensitivity to the anti-estrogen tamoxifen in patients with advanced breast cancer having failed prior aromatase inhibitor therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26 (36): 5896-5903.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Townsley C, Oza AM, Tang P, Siu LL, Pond GR, Sarveswaran P: Expanded phase I study of vorinostat (VOR) in combination with capecitabine (CAP) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1324-30. 2008, 26 (8): 1324-1330.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ramalingam SS, Parise RA, Ramanathan RK, Lagattuta TF, Musguire LA, Stoller RG: Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced solid malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 3605-3610.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Krug LM, Curley T, Schwartz L, Richardson S, Marks P, Chiao J: Potential role of histone deacetylase inhibitors in mesothelioma: clinical experience with suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid. Clin Lung Cancer. 2006, 7: 257-261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheung EM, Quinn DI, Tsao-Wei DD, Groshen SG, Aparicio AM, Twardowski P: Phase II study of vorinostat (Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid, SAHA) in patients with advanced transitional cell urothelial cancer (TCC) after platinum-based therapy – California Cancer Consortium/University of Pittsburgh NCI/CTEP-sponsored trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  37. Modesitt SC, Sill M, Hoffman JS, Bender DP: A phase II study of vorinostat in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2008, 109: 182-186.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Misset J, Tredaniel J, Descourt R, Morot-Sibilot D, Zalcman G, Gachard E: Vorinostat in combination with gemcitabine plus platinum in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase I, dose-escalation study. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fouladi M, Park JR, Sun J, Ingle AM, Ames MM, Stewart CF: A phase I trial and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of vorinostat (SAHA) in combination with 13 cis-retinoic acid (13cRA) in children with refractory neuroblastomas, medulloblastomas, primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs), and atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  40. Richardson P, Mitsiades C, Colson K, Reilly E, McBride L, Chiao J: Phase I trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008, 49: 502-507.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Blumenschein GR, Kies MS, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Lu C, Kumar AJ, Ricker JL: Phase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (Zolinza, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2008, 26: 81-87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Finnin MS, Donigian JR, Cohen A, Richon VM, Rifkind RA, Marks PA: Structures of a histone deacetylase homologue bound to the TSA and SAHA inhibitors. Nature. 1999, 401: 188-193.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Acharya MR, Sparreboom A, Venitz J, Figg WD: Rational development of histone deacetylase inhibitors as anticancer agents: a review. Mol Pharmacol. 2005, 68: 917-932.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bolden JE, Peart MJ, Johnstone RW: Anticancer activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006, 5: 769-784.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kraker AJ, Mizzen CA, Hartl BG, Miin J, Allis CD, Merriman RL: Modulation of histone acetylation by [4-(acetylamino)-N-(2-amino-phenyl) benzamide] in HCT-8 colon carcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003, 2: 401-408.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Prakash S, Foster BJ, Meyer M, Wozniak A, Heilbrun LK, Flaherty L: Chronic oral administration of CI-994: a phase 1 study. Invest New Drugs. 2001, 19: 1-11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nemunaitis JJ, Orr D, Eager R, Cunningham CC, Williams A, Mennel R: Phase I study of oral CI-994 in combination with gemcitabine in treatment of patients with advanced cancer. Cancer J. 2003, 9: 58-66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pauer LR, Olivares J, Cunningham C, Williams A, Grove W, Kraker A: Phase I study of oral CI-994 in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Invest. 2004, 22: 886-896.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Undevia SD, Janisch L, Schilsky RL, Loury D, Balasubramanian S, Mani C: Phase I study of the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) PCI-24781. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  50. Undevia SD, Kindler HL, Janisch L, Olson SC, Schilsky RL, Vogelzang NJ: A phase I study of the oral combination of CI-994, a putative histone deacetylase inhibitor, and capecitabine. Ann Oncol. 2004, 15: 1705-1711.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nakajima H, Kim YB, Terano H, Yoshida M, Horinouchi S: FR901228, a potent antitumor antibiotic, is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor. Exp Cell Res. 1998, 241: 126-133.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ueda H, Nakajima H, Hori Y, Fujita T, Nishimura M, Goto T: FR901228, a novel antitumor bicyclic depsipeptide produced by Chromobacterium violaceum No. 968. I. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation, physico-chemical and biological properties, and antitumor activity. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1994, 47: 301-310.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Doss HH, Jones SF, Infante JR, Spigel DR, Willcutt N, Lamar R: A phase I trial of romidepsin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic and other advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  54. Piekarz R, Luchenko V, Draper D, Wright JJ, Figg WD, Fojo AT: Phase I trial of romidepsin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, given on days one, three and five in patients with thyroid and other advanced cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  55. Klimek VM, Fircanis S, Maslak P, Guernah I, Baum M, Wu N: Tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics studies of depsipeptide (romidepsin) in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or advanced myelodysplastic syndromes. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 826-832.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Schrump DS, Fischette MR, Nguyen DM, Zhao M, Li X, Kunst TF: Clinical and molecular responses in lung cancer patients receiving Romidepsin. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 188-198.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Stadler WM, Margolin K, Ferber S, McCulloch W, Thompson JA: A phase II study of depsipeptide in refractory metastatic renal cell cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2006, 5: 57-60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Piekarz RL, Frye AR, Wright JJ, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, Rosing DR: Cardiac studies in patients treated with depsipeptide, FK228, in a phase II trial for T-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 3762-3773.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Leoni F, Fossati G, Lewis EC, Lee JK, Porro G, Pagani P: The histone deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 reduces production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro and systemic inflammation in vivo. Mol Med. 2005, 11: 1-15.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Viviani S, Bonfante V, Fasola C, Valagussa P, Gianni AM: Phase II study of the histone-deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  61. Galli M, Salmoiraghi S, Golay J, Gozzini A, Bosi A, Crippa C: A phase II multiple dose clinical trial of histone deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 in patients with relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma: preliminary results. Blood. 2007, 110 (11):

  62. Bali P, Pranpat M, Bradner J, Balasis M, Fiskus W, Guo F: Inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 acetylates and disrupts the chaperone function of heat shock protein 90: a novel basis for antileukemia activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 26729-26734.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Giles F, Fischer T, Cortes J, Garcia-Manero G, Beck J, Ravandi F: A phase I study of intravenous LBH589, a novel cinnamic hydroxamic acid analogue histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 4628-4635.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rathkopf DE, Wong BY, Ross RW, George DJ, Picus J, Tanaka E: A phase I study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) alone and in combination with docetaxel (Doc) and prednisone in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). J Clin Oncol J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):2959-65. 2008, 26 (18): 2959-2965.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Duvic M, Vanaclocha F, Bernengo MG, Okada C, Breneman D, Zinzani PL: Phase II study of oral panobinostat (LBH589), a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL). J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  66. Zhou N, Moradei O, Raeppel S, Leit S, Frechette S, Gaudette F: Discovery of N-(2-aminophenyl)-4-[(4-pyridin-3-ylpyrimidin-2-ylamino)methyl]benzamide (MGCD0103), an orally active histone deacetylase inhibitor. J Med Chem. 2008, 51: 4072-4075.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Tourneau CL, Siu LL: Promising antitumor activity with MGCD0103 a novel isotype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008, 17: 1247-1254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Siu LL, Pili R, Duran I, Messersmith WA, Chen EX, Sullivan R: Phase I study of MGCD0103 given as a three-times-per-week oral dose in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: 1940-1947.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Garcia-Manero G, Assouline S, Cortes J, Estrov Z, Kantarjian H, Yang H: Phase I study of the oral isotype specific histone deacetylase inhibitor MGCD0103 in leukemia. Blood. 2008, 112: 981-989.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hurwitz H, Nelson B, O'Dwyer PJ, Chiorean EG, Gabrail N, Laille E: Phase I/II: The oral isotype-selective HDAC inhibitor MGCD0103 in combination with gemcitabine (Gem) in patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: abst # 4625. Ref Type: Journal (Full)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Crump M, Andreadis C, Assouline S, Rizzieri D, Wedgwood A, McLaughlin P: Treatment of relapsed or refractory non-hodgkin lymphoma with the oral isotype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor MGCD0103: Interim results from a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  72. Bociek RG, Kuruvilla J, Pro B, Wedgwood A, Li Z, Drouin M: Isotype-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor MGCD0103 demonstrates clinical activity and safety in patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL). J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  73. Saito A, Yamashita T, Mariko Y, Nosaka Y, Tsuchiya K, Ando T: A synthetic inhibitor of histone deacetylase, MS-27–275, with marked in vivo antitumor activity against human tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 4592-4597.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hess-Stumpp H, Bracker TU, Henderson D, Politz O: MS-275, a potent orally available inhibitor of histone deacetylases – the development of an anticancer agent. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007, 39: 1388-1405.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Gojo I, Jiemjit A, Trepel JB, Sparreboom A, Figg WD, Rollins S: Phase 1 and pharmacologic study of MS-275, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in adults with refractory and relapsed acute leukemias. Blood. 2007, 109: 2781-2790.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gore L, Rothenberg ML, O'Bryant CL, Schultz MK, Sandler AB, Coffin D: A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Oral Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, MS-275, in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors and Lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 4517-4525.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Hauschild A, Trefzer U, Garbe C, Kaehler KC, Ugurel S, Kiecker F: Multicenter phase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor pyridylmethyl-N-4-{[(2-aminophenyl)-carbamoyl]-benzyl}-carbamate in pretreated metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2008, 18: 274-278.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Buggy JJ, Cao ZA, Bass KE, Verner E, Balasubramanian S, Liu L: CRA-024781: a novel synthetic inhibitor of histone deacetylase enzymes with antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006, 5: 1309-1317.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Pili R, Kruszewski MP, Hager BW, Lantz J, Carducci MA: Combination of phenylbutyrate and 13-cis retinoic acid inhibits prostate tumor growth and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 1477-1485.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Camacho LH, Olson J, Tong WP, Young CW, Spriggs DR, Malkin MG: Phase I dose escalation clinical trial of phenylbutyrate sodium administered twice daily to patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2007, 25: 131-138.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Carducci MA, Gilbert J, Bowling MK, Noe D, Eisenberger MA, Sinibaldi V: A Phase I clinical and pharmacological evaluation of sodium phenylbutyrate on an 120-h infusion schedule. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 3047-3055.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Gilbert J, Baker SD, Bowling MK, Grochow L, Figg WD, Zabelina Y: A phase I dose escalation and bioavailability study of oral sodium phenylbutyrate in patients with refractory solid tumor malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 2292-2300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Sung MW, Waxman S: Combination of cytotoxic-differentiation therapy with 5-fluorouracil and phenylbutyrate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2007, 27: 995-1001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Maslak P, Chanel S, Camacho LH, Soignet S, Pandolfi PP, Guernah I: Pilot study of combination transcriptional modulation therapy with sodium phenylbutyrate and 5-azacytidine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2006, 20: 212-217.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Plumb JA, Finn PW, Williams RJ, Bandara MJ, Romero MR, Watkins CJ: Pharmacodynamic response and inhibition of growth of human tumor xenografts by the novel histone deacetylase inhibitor PXD101. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003, 2: 721-728.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Steele NL, Plumb JA, Vidal L, Tjornelund J, Knoblauch P, Rasmussen A: A phase 1 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 804-810.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Gimsing P, Hansen M, Knudsen LM, Knoblauch P, Christensen IJ, Ooi CE: A Phase I clinical trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat (PXD101) in patients with advanced haematological neoplasia. Eur J Haematol. 2008, 81: 170-176.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Mackay H, Hirte HW, Covens A, MacAlpine K, Wang L, Tsao MS: A phase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat (PXD101) in patients with platinum resistant epithelial ovarian tumors and micropapillary/borderline (LMP) ovarian tumors. A PMH phase II consortium trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26:

    Google Scholar 

  89. Gottlicher M, S Minucci, P Zhu, OH Kramer, A Schimpf, S Giavara: Valproic acid defines a novel class of HDAC inhibitors inducing differentiation of transformed cells. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 6969-6978.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Kuendgen A, Schmid M, Schlenk R, Knipp S, Hildebrandt B, Steidl C: The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor valproic acid as monotherapy or in combination with all-trans retinoic acid in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2006, 106: 112-119.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Bug G, Ritter M, Wassmann B, Schoch C, Heinzel T, Schwarz K: Clinical trial of valproic acid and all-trans retinoic acid in patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2005, 104: 2717-2725.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Chavez-Blanco A, Segura-Pacheco B, Perez-Cardenas E, Taja-Chayeb L, Cetina L, Candelaria M: Histone acetylation and histone deacetylase activity of magnesium valproate in tumor and peripheral blood of patients with cervical cancer. A phase I study. Mol Cancer. 2005, 4: 22-

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Atmaca A, Al-Batran SE, Maurer A, Neumann A, Heinzel T, Hentsch B: Valproic acid (VPA) in patients with refractory advanced cancer: a dose escalating phase I clinical trial. Br J Cancer. 2007, 97: 177-182.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Shapiro TA, Fahey JW, nkova-Kostova AT, Holtzclaw WD, Stephenson KK, Wade KL: Safety, tolerance, and metabolism of broccoli sprout glucosinolates and isothiocyanates: a clinical phase I study. Nutr Cancer. 2006, 55: 53-62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Chiao JW, Wu H, Ramaswamy G, Conaway CC, Chung FL, Wang L: Ingestion of an isothiocyanate metabolite from cruciferous vegetables inhibits growth of human prostate cancer cell xenografts by apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Carcinogenesis. 2004, 25: 1403-1408.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Lu L, Liu D, Ma X, Beklemishev A, Seiter K, Ahmed T: The phenylhexyl isothiocyanate induces apoptosis and inhibits leukemia cell growth in vivo. Oncol Rep. 2006, 16: 1363-1367.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Lu Q, Lin X, Feng J, Zhao X, Gallagher R, Lee MY: Phenylhexyl isothiocyanate has dual function as histone deacetylase inhibitor and hypomethylating agent and can inhibit myeloma cell growth by targeting critical pathways. J Hematol Oncol. 2008, 1: 6-

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Ma X, Fang Y, Beklemisheva A, Dai W, Feng J, Ahmed T: Phenylhexyl isothiocyanate inhibits histone deacetylases and remodels chromatins to induce growth arrest in human leukemia cells. Int J Oncol. 2006, 28: 1287-1293.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Wang LG, Beklemisheva A, Liu XM, Ferrari AC, Feng J, Chiao JW: Dual action on promoter demethylation and chromatin by an isothiocyanate restored GSTP1 silenced in prostate cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2007, 46: 24-31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Wang LG, Liu XM, Fang Y, Dai W, Chiao FB, Puccio GM: De-repression of the p21 promoter in prostate cancer cells by an isothiocyanate via inhibition of HDACs and c-Myc. Int J Oncol. 2008, 33: 375-380.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Qian DZ, Wang X, Kachhap SK, Kato Y, Wei Y, Zhang L: The histone deacetylase inhibitor NVP-LAQ824 inhibits angiogenesis and has a greater antitumor effect in combination with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor PTK787/ZK222584. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 6626-6634.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Remiszewski SW, Sambucetti LC, Bair KW, Bontempo J, Cesarz D, Chandramouli N: N-hydroxy-3-phenyl-2-propenamides as novel inhibitors of human histone deacetylase with in vivo antitumor activity: discovery of (2E)-N-hydroxy-3-[4-[[(2-hydroxyethyl)[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amino]methyl]phenyl]-2-propenamide (NVP-LAQ824). J Med Chem. 2003, 46: 4609-4624.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Hurtubise A, Momparler RL: Effect of histone deacetylase inhibitor LAQ824 on antineoplastic action of 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) on human breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006, 58: 618-625.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Grant S: The novel histone deacetylase inhibitor NVP-LAQ824: an addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in leukemia?. Leukemia. 2004, 18: 1931-1933.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Atadja P, Hsu M, Kwon P, Trogani N, Bhalla K, Remiszewski S: Molecular and cellular basis for the anti-proliferative effects of the HDAC inhibitor LAQ824. Novartis Found Symp. 2004, 259: 249-266.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Atadja P, Gao L, Kwon P, Trogani N, Walker H, Hsu M: Selective growth inhibition of tumor cells by a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, NVP-LAQ824. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 689-695.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Shundong Cang and Yuehua Ma are CAHON (CAHON.ORG) Research Scholars and recipients of fellowship grants from the International Scholar Exchange Foundation. This work was partly supported by New York Medical College Blood Diseases Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA

    Shundong Cang, Yuehua Ma & Delong Liu

  2. Henan Province People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, PR China

    Shundong Cang & Yuehua Ma

Authors
  1. Shundong Cang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuehua Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Delong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delong Liu.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SC and DL are involved in concept design. All authors participated in data collection, drafting and critically revising the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cang, S., Ma, Y. & Liu, D. New clinical developments in histone deacetylase inhibitors for epigenetic therapy of cancer. J Hematol Oncol 2, 22 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-2-22

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-2-22

Keywords

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  • Gemcitabine
  • Maximal Tolerate Dose
  • Histone Acetylation
  • HDAC Inhibitor

Journal of Hematology & Oncology

ISSN: 1756-8722

Contact us