- Case report
- Open Access
Complete response to FOLFOX4 therapy in a patient with advanced urothelial cancer: a case report
© Seo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 26 October 2009
Accepted: 20 January 2010
Published: 20 January 2010
No standard has been established for salvage therapy in gemcitabine refractory advanced urothelial cancer. We report the complete response to FOLFOX4 therapy of a metastatic urothelial cancer patient, for whom adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy had failed. A 54-year-old male patient with urothelial cancer (transitional cell carcinoma) in the right kidney underwent three rounds of adjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy after extensive radical nephrectomy. However, he had new liver, lung metastases and synchronous two separate primary colon cancer. The lung metastasis lesion was confirmed as a metastatic urothelial cancer via percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB). Liver and lung metastasis lesions disappeared after the 4th cycle of FOLFOX4 chemotherapy. In addition, colon cancer also disappeared after the 8th cycle of FOLFOX4 chemotherapy. The patient was still showing a complete response after 4 months. Clinical trials using the FOLFOX regimen as salvage therapy for gemcitabine-refractory advanced urothelial cancer are warranted.
Most urothelial cancer develops from the urinary bladder, while urothelial cancer of the upper urinary tract is uncommon, accounting for only 5 to 10% of all renal tumours. The standard therapy for urothelial cancer is surgical resection, although cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy increases the survival in metastatic advanced urothelial cancer [2–4]. Nevertheless, a complete response is very rare, and most patients die within 2 years of diagnosis. At present, the standard therapy is gemcitabine-cisplatin combination therapy because M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin), which was previously the standard therapy, has a mortality due to toxicity exceeding 3% [5–7]. No standard has been established for salvage therapy in gemcitabine-refractory advanced urothelial cancer, and many ongoing clinical trials are examining new agents.
We report a complete response to FOLFOX-4 therapy in a patient with metastatic urothelial cancer who developed lung metastases and an additional primary colon cancer after a radical nephrectomy for urothelial cancer.
For the last 15 years, M-VAC chemotherapy was used to treat metastatic or advanced urothelial cancer, and gave a tumor response of 50~70% with increased survival in 15~20% of patients[2, 8, 9]. However, the reported mortality related to therapy exceeded 3%, and 25% of the patients developed neutropenic sepsis, so its use was limited to young patients or those with good general performance. Gemcitabine was reported to give a good response in urothelial cancer and has low toxicity. Finally, a phase III study of gemcitabine-cisplatin (G-C) showed a similar response rate and survival compared with M-VAC, but lower toxicity and better safety. Consequently, G-C is now used widely to treat urothelial cancer. Unfortunately, the tumor recurs in most patients within one year[9, 10], necessitating secondary therapy after the failure of standard therapy. Although many ongoing clinical trials are examining this, no treatment has been established as secondary therapy after failure of G-C or M-VAC chemotherapy.
Oxaliplatin is more potent than cisplatin in vitro and has shown efficacy in preclinical studies against many tumor cell lines[11, 12]. It has also proved efficacious in several phase II trials and is considered less nephrotoxic than cisplatin and causes less bone marrow suppression than carboplatin[10, 13, 14]. However, the activity of an oxaliplatin single regimen for urothelial cell cancer was minimal in phase II studies by Moore et al. and Winquist et al.. Therefore, we suggest that our case of TCC showed a complete response due to synergistic effects of FOLFOX-4, rather than to those of oxaliplatin as a single drug. The efficacy of 5-FU and leucovorin combination therapy for colorectal cancer is widely known[15, 16]. The efficacy of 5-FU in advanced urothelial cancer is unclear, but a review of published studies in 1987 described response rates of about 15% using unmodulated single agent 5-FU. In combination with alpha interferon, a partial response rate of 30% was obtained. Recently, a phase II trial of continuous 5-FU infusion showed a median progression-free survival of 1.9 months and a median overall survival of 6.5 months.
The FOLFOX regimen, which is a combination of 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, can involve various doses and schedules. It shows low toxicity and good efficacy for colon cancer and stomach cancer, so it is used widely at present. The addition of new agents such as bevacizumab is expected to increase the complete response and survival rates for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [20, 21]. There are few reports of FOLFOX therapy for urothelial cancer, only a phase II trial by Lorenzo et al., published in 2004. They used FOLFOX-4 in 18 patients who had previously been treated for urothelial cancer, and reported only low-grade toxicity and a 19% overall response rate, all partial responses.
Our patient was given FOLFOX therapy because the urothelial cancer failed to respond to G-C combination therapy, as metastases were discovered and there was an accompanying second primary colon cancer. He showed a complete response in both the metastatic urothelial cancer and colon cancer. In addition to the ongoing clinical studies of gallium nitrate, ifosfamide, pemetrexed, vinflunine, and molecular targeting agents, a clinical trial of FOLFOX-4 therapy for urothelial cancer seems to be warranted.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in Chief of this journal.
- Oosterlinck W, Solsona E, Meijden van der APM, Sylvester R, Böhle A, Rintala E, Lobel B: EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma. European Urology. 2004, 46: 147-154. 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.04.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sternberg CN, Yagoda A, Scher HI: Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin for Advanced Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelium. Efficacy and patterns of response and relapse. Cancer. 1989, 64: 2448-2458. 10.1002/1097-0142(19891215)64:12<2448::AID-CNCR2820641209>3.0.CO;2-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harker WG, Meyers FJ, Freiha FS, Palmer JM, Shortliffe LD, Hannigan JF, McWhirter KM, Torti FM: Cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine (CMV): an effective chemotherapy regimen for metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. A Northern California Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1985, 3: 1463-1470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roth BJ, Bajorin DF: Advanced bladder cancer: the need to identify new agents in the post-M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin). world J Urol. 1995, 153: 894-900.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maase von der H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT, Dogliotti L, Oliver T, Moore MJ, Bodrogi I, Albers P, Knuth A, Lippert CM, Kerbrat P, Sanchez Rovira P, Wersall P, Cleall SP, Roychowdhury DF, Tomlin I, Visseren-Grul CM, Conte PF: J Clin Oncol. 2000, 18: 3068-3077.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lorusso V, Pollera CF, Antimi M, Luporini G, Gridelli C, Frassineti GL, Oliva C, Pacini M, De Lena M: A phase II study of gemcitabine in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract previously treated with platinum. Italian Co-operative Group on Bladder Cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1998, 34: 1208-1212. 10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00030-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore MJ, Tannock IF, Ernst DS, Huan S, Murray N: Gemcitabine: a promising new agent in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997, 12: 3441-3445.Google Scholar
- Bajorin , Dodd P, Mazumdar M, Fazzari M, McCaffrey J, Scher H, Herr H, Higgins G, Boyle M: Long-term survival in metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17: 3173-3181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bellmunt J, Albanell J, Paz-Ares L, Climent MA, Gonzalez-Larriba JL, Carles J, de la Cruz JJ, Guillem V, Diaz-Rubio E, Cortes-Funes H, Baselga J: Pretreatment prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced urothelial tumors treated in a phase I/II trial with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine. Cancer. 2002, 95: 751-757. 10.1002/cncr.10762.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carles J, Esteban E, Climent M, Font A, Gonzalez-Larriba JL, Berrocal A, Garcia-Ribas I, Marfa X, Fabregat X, Albanell J, Bellmunt J: Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination: a multicenter phase II trial in unfit patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. Annals of Oncology. 2007, 18: 1359-1362. 10.1093/annonc/mdm160.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunn TA, Schmoll HJ, Granwald V, Bokemeyer V, Casper J: Comparative cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in non-seminomatous germ cell cancer cell lines. Invest New Drugs. 1997, 15: 109-114. 10.1023/A:1005800520747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rixe O, Ortuzar W, Alvarez M, Parker R, Reed E, Paull K, Fojo T: Oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin: spectrum of activity in drug-resistant cell lines and in the cell lines of the National Cancer Institute's Anticancer Drug Screen panel. Biochem Pharmacol. 1996, 52: 1855-1865. 10.1016/S0006-2952(97)81490-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore MJ, Winquist E, Vokes E, Hirte H, Hoving K, Stadler WM: Phase II study of oxaliplatin in patients with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract (TCC) who have received prior chemotherapy. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003, 22: 48-52.Google Scholar
- Winquist E, Vokes E, Moore MJ, Schumm LP, Hoving K, Stadler WM: A Phase II study of oxaliplatin in urothelial cancer. 2005, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 23: 150-154.Google Scholar
- Giacchetti S, Perpoint B, Zidani R, Le Bail N, Faggiuolo R, Focan C, Chollet P, Llory JF, Letourneau Y, Coudert B, Bertheaut-Cvitkovic F, Larregain-Fournier D, Le Rol A, Walter S, Adam R, Misset JL, Levi F: Phase III multicenter randomized trial of oxaliplatin added to chronomodulated fluorouracil-leucovorin as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000, 18: 136-147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rothenberg ML, Oza AM, Bigelow RH, Berlin JD, Marshall JL, Ramanathan RK, Hart LL, Gupta S, Garay CA, Burger BG, Le Bail N, Haller DG: Superiority of oxaliplatin and 5-FU/leucovorin over either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer following irinotecan and 5-FU/leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21: 2059-2069. 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yagoda A: Chemotherapy of urothelial tract tumors. Cancer. 1987, 60: 574-585. 10.1002/1097-0142(19870801)60:3+<574::AID-CNCR2820601524>3.0.CO;2-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Logothetis CJ, Hossan E, Sella A, Dexeus FH, Amato RJ: Fluorouracil and recombinant human interferon alpha-2a in the treatment of metastatic chemotherapy-refractory urothelial tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991, 83: 285-288. 10.1093/jnci/83.4.285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Highley MS, Griffithsy GO, Uscinskay BM, Huddartz JB, Barberx P, Parmary MKB, Harper PG: A Phase II Trial of Continuous 5-Fluorouracil in Recurrent or Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urinary Tract. Clinical Oncology. 2009, 21: 394-400. 10.1016/j.clon.2009.01.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Javle M, Hsueh CT: Updates in Gastrointestinal Oncology - insights from the 2008 44th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2009, 2: 9-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Malavasi N, Ponti G, Depenni R, Bertolini F, Zironi S, Luppi G, Conte PF: Complete pathological response in a patient with multiple liver metastases from colon cancer treated with Folfox-6 chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: a case report. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2009, 2:Google Scholar
- Lorenzo GD, Autorino R, Giordano A, Giuliano M, D'Armiento M, Bianco1 AR, De Placido S: FOLFOX-4 in Pre-treated Patients with Advanced Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004, 34: 747-750. 10.1093/jjco/hyh132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perabo FGE, Müller SC: New agents for treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma. Annals of Oncology. 2007, 18: 835-843. 10.1093/annonc/mdl331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.