Open Access

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China: where we are and where to go

Journal of Hematology & Oncology20125:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-5-10

Received: 9 February 2012

Accepted: 18 March 2012

Published: 18 March 2012

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective and sometimes the only curative therapy for patients with certain hematological diseases. Allo-HSCT has been practiced in China for approximately 30 years, and great improvements have been made within the past decade, particularly in fields such as the haploidentical HSCT system, strategies to overcome relapse and GVHD, and modified HSCT for elderly patients. This review will describe the current situation and provide a prospective of these unique aspects of Allo-HSCT in China.

Keywords

ChinaAllo-HSCTHaploidenticalRelapseGVHDElderly patients

Current status of Allo-HSCT in China

It has been more than thirty years since the first allogeneic bone marrow transplantation was successfully performed in China [1], and during the past decades, substantial progress has been made in the field of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Currently, there are 104 transplant units certified by China's Ministry of Health and the China Marrow Donor Program. Of these centers, 60% are active and routinely perform HSCT. According to data collected from 50 active centers by the Chinese Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Registry Group (2007-2011), 5 centers performed more than 100 HSCT cases annually, and approximately 30 centers performed 20-100 cases per year. The total number of HSCT cases in all 50 active centers increased steadily from 1093 cases in 2007 to 1633 cases in 2010 [2]. By the end of 2011, this figure has been greater than 2000 by the preliminary statistics.

The types of donor sources for Allo-HSCT in China are related identical (47.3%), related mismatched/haploidentical (30.8%), unrelated matched (12.1%), unrelated mismatched (7.7%), umbilical cord blood (UCB, 2.2%) and Allo-HSCT accounts for 91% of the total HSCT cases. (Figure 1) [2]. These data are quite different from those reported by the CIBMTR(Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), which show that autologous HSCT takes up 58% of the total HSCT cases and that unrelated donors comprise nearly half of all the allogeneic HSCT graft sources in the USA. Data on haploidentical HSCT(Haplo-HSCT) cases are not available [3]. The distribution of diseases occurring in allogeneic transplant recipients is as follows: acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (34%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (24%), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (20%), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (7%), aplastic anemia (AA) (7%), Mediterranean anemia (MIA) (2%), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (3%), and other diseases (2%) (Figure 2). The proportions of disease types receiving allo-HSCT are similar to those reported by the CIBMTR. However, although the overall number of allo-HSCT cases in CML patients has decreased gradually in recent years, these patients still make up a relatively large proportion of the total allo-HSCT cases (approximately 20%). This is due to the potential accumulated expenses of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for young CML patients as well as the significant survival advantage of allo-HSCT compared with imatinimb treatment for patients with AP CML [4].
Figure 1

The types of donor sources for allo-HSCT in China.

Figure 2

The distribution of diseases of allo-HSCT recipients in China.

The unique characters of Chinese HSCT system

Though research resources for HSCT in China are limited, for example, HSCT researchers are allotted only 16% of the total financial support administered by the National Science Foundation in hematology, an increasing number of clinical and applied fundamental research studies in HSCT have been published in influential journals or presented orally at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting. Also, HSCT in China is not just imitation, there are some characteristic aspects which may contribute to other HSCT programs around the world.

These unique characters of Chinese HSCT system can be divided into four categories: Haplo-HSCT system, strategies to overcome relapse and GVHD, and modified HSCT for elderly patients. The initiation of multi-center clinical trials and advances in translational research are important for promoting progress in HSCT methods in China.

Evidence-based and mechanism research on Haplo-HSCT

Haplo-HSCT is one of the acceptable alternatives in the absence of HLA-matched siblings or unrelated donors [5, 6]. There are three main strategies to complete Haplo-HSCT: T cell-depleted myeloablative HSCT, unmanipulated myeloablative HSCT, or nonmyeloablative/reduced intensity conditioned HSCT [5, 7]. Transplantation with T cell-depleted peripheral blood progenitor cells has a low rate of GVHD, but these transplants are associated with slow immune recovery, a high rate of relapse, and a substantial risk of treatment-related mortality [8]. Nonmyeloablative Haplo-HSCT shows relatively lower nonrelapse mortality but a higher rate of overall relapse [9]. The typical Haplo-HSCT systems around the world are summarized in (Table 1) [816].
Table 1

Studies on Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Patients(n)

Disease

Conditioning

Graft/ Manipulation

GVHD Prophylaxis

GF

aGVHD

cGVHD

TRM

LFS/DFS

Nation

Reference

104

AL

ST:TBI/thiotepa/fludarabine/ATG

PB/CD34+ selection

No

1st 6.9%

(II-IV)7.9%

7.1%

36.5%

AL CR:46%-48%

Italy

Aversa

(2005)[8]

49

AL/MDS/ CML/MPD

RIC: Flu+Cy/ anti-CD52

PB/anti-CD52

CsA+MMF

6%

(II-IV)16%

14%

10.2%

31-63%@1-3 year

U.S.A

Rizzieri

(2007)[10]

24

AL/AA

ST:TBI/CY

BM/costimulatory blockade

CsA+MTX

5%

(III-IV)23.8%

8.3%

50%

33%@7 years

U.S.A

Guinan

(2008)[11]

60

AL/NHL/ CML/MM

RIC:Flu/Mel/OKT-3/thiotepa

PB/CD3+CD19 depletion

No if CD3+T < 5 × 104/kg

0

(II-IV)47%

15%

25%@100 days

44%@7 years

HR 41%@1 year 24%@2 years

Germany

Federmann

(2009)[12]

66

AL/MDS

RIC:TBI/flu/Bu/ATG/melphalan

PB or BM/No

FK506

6.1%

(II-IV)38%

33.3%

59.1%

28.8%@4 years

Japan

Kurokawa

(2010)[13]

820

AL/CML/ NHL/AA

ST:Bu/Cy/Ara-C/MeCCNU/ATG

BM+PB/No

CsA+MTX +MMF

< 1%

(II-IV)42.9%

(III-IV)14.0%

Total 53.7%

Ex 23.4%

@2 years

21%@2 years

SR68.1% HR47.1%

@2 years

China

Huang

(2011)[14]

83

AL/MDS

RIC:Bu/Flu/ATG

PB/No

CsA+MTX

0

24%

28%

17%@1 year

AML/MDS

CR53%-60%;

AML RE9%

Korea

Lee

(2011)[15]

50

AL/MDS

RIC:Cy/Flu/TBI

BM/No

Cy(HD)+ FK506+MMF

4%

(II-IV)32%

13%

7%@1 year

46%@1 year

U.S.A

Fuchs

(2011)[9]

21

AL/CML

ST:Bu/Cy/ MeCCNU/ATG

PB/No

CsA+MTX +MMF

0

(II-IV)33.8%

39.5%

20%@2 years

55.6%@2 years

China

Yu

(2012)[16]

HLA Human leukocyte antigen; AL Acute Leukemia; CML chronic myelogenous leukemia; MDS myelodysplastic syndrome; ST Standard intensity/Myeloablative; RIC reduced intensity; Bu Busulfan; Cy cyclophosphamide; Ara-C aracytidine; TBI total-body irradiation; MeCCNU Semustine; CsA cyclosporine A; MMF Mycophenolate mofetil; Flu fludrabine; ATG antithymocyte globulin; FK506 Tacrolimus; anti-CD52 alemtuzumab; GF graft failure; HR high risk; SR standard risk; Re refractory; Ex extensive; GVHD Graft versus host disease

Due to the "One Child Policy", there has been a shortage of HLA-identical siblings for Chinese patients who need HSCT; what's more, the donor pool of Chinese Marrow Donor Program and cord blood banks are still relatively small in view of the massive Chinese population [17], Therefore haplo-HSCT based on related family donors has a unique role in the treatment of hematologic disease in China. Peking University researchers developed a novel approach for HLA-mismatched/haploidentical myeloablative blood and marrow transplantation without in vitro T cell depletion within the past 10 years (the GIAC protocol). This protocol includes the following steps: treating donors with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to induce donor immune tolerance, intensified immunological suppression to both promote engraftment and prevent GVHD, antithymocyte globulin (ATG) administration for the prophylaxis of GVHD and graft rejection, and combination of G-CSF-primed bone marrow harvest (G-BM) and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell harvest (G-PB) as the source of stem cell grafts [1821]. A single-center study reported that unmanipulated myeloablative HSCT using the GIAC protocol has similar LFS/grade, III-IVaGVHD/extensive, chronic GVHD compared with HLA-matched sibling transplantation or matched unrelated donor transplantation [19, 21]. The GIAC protocol also demonstrated improved GVL effects [22]. Also, modified haploidentical nonmyeloablative transplantation without T cell depletion and haploidentical PBSCT have been successfully launched as routine procedures in other centers in China [16, 23]. Besides Hematological malignancies, haplo-HSCT has become a feasible and safe treatment for nonmalignant hematological diseases, such as severe aplastic anemia [24]. Based on the extensive application, together with unique immunomodulatory strategies for relapse (Referred to 2.2) and mechanism researches, haplo-HSCT of China has developed to a characteristic system. To date, haplo-HSCT accounts for approximately 30% of the total allo-HSCT cases per year in China, and in some experienced centers, such as Peking University Institute of Hematology, this proportion has consistently exceeded 60%, and the cumulative haploidentical cases increased to more than 1300 in single center at the end of 2011.

Though the HLA polymorphism of China is more heterogeneous than that of Japan and Korea, as there are 56 different nationalities in China and the main nationality "Han" also varies in HLA alleles across the vast mainland [2528]; Haplo-HSCT become more popular in China because of both the well-established clinical regimen and the shortage of sibling and unrelated donors, whereas Japan and Korea marrow donor program have satisfied the need for donors in their countries [26]. What's more, the HLA polymorphism of continental Northeast Asia varies similar to that of Europe and North America [29], which suggest experience of haplo-HSCT in China may be exportable in Europe and North America.

Nevertheless, there are still several problems confronting the future development of haplo-HSCT. First, although the underlying mechanism of crossing the HLA barrier has been partially explained by a series of in vitro and in vivo studies: G-CSF leads to T cell hyporesponsiveness and modulates the balance between Th1 and Th2 immune responses [30]; G-CSF treatment significantly decreased the expression of VLA-4, ICAM-1, L-selectin, and LFA-1 on naïve CD4+ and CD8 + T cells in bone marrow grafts. It was also found easier to polarize T cells from Th1 to Th2 in G-BM compared with G-PB [31]; T cell hyporesponsiveness and polarization of T cell from Th1 to Th2 could be maintained after in vitro mixture of G-PB and G-BM, besides the benefits of independent component [32]. Depletion of infused donor lymphocytes in vivo by ATG, and induction of regulatory T cells [33], etc. However, the complete story has not yet been elucidated. For example, in contrast with ex vivo T cells depletion haplo-HSCT model [34], our finding showed that KIR ligand mismatch is associated with higher aGVHD, a greater relapse rate and inferior survival in our unmanipulated HSCT system [35]; additional results suggested that NK cell allo-reactivity could be covered by massive T cells [36], which need further investigation. Second, reports from single centers are not as convincing as those from multi-center clinical trials. Evaluating a uniform haplo-HSCT protocol, such as GIAC, in more Chinese clinical centers would enable prospective, multi-center trials on the standardized treatment. These types of studies would hopefully aid in evaluating the roles of haplo-HSCT in some uncertain situations.

Mechanism and management of relapse after HSCT

Relapsing hematologic malignancy after HSCT remains a major cause of death for patients, and finding methods to trigger a more potent graft-versus-tumor effect without increasing the risk of GVHD is still the ultimate goal of HSCT. Many Chinese researchers have attempted to address this challenge.

In a recent study, Huang and his colleagues provide the first report of multiple mutations of CEBPA that contribute to the transformation of donor cells to the leukemic phenotype and provide clues of relapse from donor origin. Huang found that after the first genetic mutation involved in leukemogenesis occurs in the donor, the susceptible donor cells can acquire second or third mutations in different genes or recessive mutations in a single gene after transplantation to the recipient's particular microenvironment. This acquisition of mutations can lead to overt leukemic transformation and cause relapse. This mechanism provides a unique viewpoint that aids our understanding of the process of relapse due to the "multiple genetic-hits mechanism" and suggests that the targeting of mutated genes may be a possible strategy to prevent relapse [37]. Meanwhile, Diamond et al. found relapse of AML after allo-HSCT from donor origin who harbors germline XPD and XRCC3 polymorphisms resulting in low DNA repair capacity [38]. These research together emphasize the importance of gene polymorphisms in selecting candidate donors prior to allo-HSCT.

There is a large gap between laboratory research and clinical application; however, by integrating minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring and modified donor lymphocyte infusion (mDLI), researchers at Peking University have improved the management of relapse following HSCT in the clinic [39]. Traditional DLI with steady-state lymphocytes has been shown to effectively treat relapse, but it often causes severe GVHD [40]. However, data from other study showed that replacing steady-state lymphocytes with G-PB and applying a short course of immunosuppressive agents (administration of CSA or MTX after DLI for 2-4 weeks) reduced the incidence of DLI-associated acute GVHD without affecting relapse or survival [41]. For patients with hematological relapse after receiving allo-HSCT, the donor GPBPC infusion treatment group had a better outcome compared with chemotherapy; this finding has been demonstrated in both patients under HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched/haploidentical T-cell-replete HSCT groups [42, 43]. A later study demonstrated that mDLI treatment also had a prophylactic effect against relapse in high-risk leukemia patients after either of these types of HSCT [44, 45]. Recently, our team concluded that risk stratification-directed interventions with mDLI in MRD-positive patients with standard-risk acute leukemia could prevent leukemia relapse and further improve transplant outcomes [46]. Based on these findings, a series of clinical and basic studies were initiated to separate the GVL effect from GVHD with modified DLI in patients with hematological malignancies. These studies found that GPBPC harvests contained more CD34+ cells, Th2-type cells and type II cytokines than non-primed peripheral lymphocyte harvests, which contribute to the lower incidence of aGVHD [32, 47]. Meanwhile, the type I cytokines, like IFN-γ, was kept and capable of promoting GVL effects via mechanisms independent of its interaction with leukemia cells [48]. However, the effects of short-course immunosuppressive agents on these lymphocytes remain to be evaluated.

Prophylaxis and Management of GVHD

GVHD is the main complication post-HSCT, and Chinese doctors must address this condition due to the high proportion of haplo-HSCT cases. Thus, several novel strategies to prevent GVHD have been devised.

The application of low-dose MTX has been demonstrated as a novel regimen for the treatment of GVHD by Peking University research group in different studies. Data from a recent report suggested that MTX in combination with low-dose methylpredinisone was well-tolerated and effective when used as the first-line treatment for aGVHD [49]. It has also been suggested that MTX is a well-tolerated, effective, and inexpensive agent when used as a first-line treatment in combination with other immunosuppressive agents for cGVHD, especially for skin or single organ involvement without concomitant thrombocytopenia [50]. This finding is also supported by a consensus on clinical practices in cGVHD [51].

Lai et al. recently described the efficacy of a new GVHD prophylaxis regimen that combines CSA and MTX with a short 30-day course of low-dose (500 mg/d) mycophenolate mofetil. After allo-HSCT with identical sibling donors, the incidence of acute GVHD was 16% (9.5% for grades 2-4 GVHD and 1% for grades 3 and 4 GVHD). The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 53%, and 28% of these patients experienced the extensive type of disease [52]. Xia et al. reported that basiliximab has a similar effect on aGVHD but superior activity against cGVHD compared with daclizumab [53].

Nevertheless, most of the studies mentioned above are retrospective, and thus, further prospective and multi-center, randomized, controlled studies are needed.

In addition to drugs and antibodies, immunomodulatory cell transfusion may be a more specific method to protect patients from GVHD. Chen et al. reported that heterogenetic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could suppress T cell activation. MSC pretreatment was useful in the prevention of GVHD in HLA-mismatched bone marrow transplantation [54]. Xiang et al. reported transfusion of MSCs expanded from the BM of volunteers in vitro was a safe and effective salvage therapy for patients with steroid-resistant cGVHD, which might be mediate by increasing ratio of CD5 + CD19+/CD5-CD19+ regulatory B cells and CD8 + CD28-/CD8 + CD28+ T cells [55]. However, the cotransplantation of MSCs and HSCs may prevent GVHD while elevating the risk of relapse and therefore must be handled with extreme caution.

Basic and Pre-clinical researches on GVHD have also been highly regarded in China. Zhao showed blockade of osteopontin(OPN) could reduce alloreactive CD8+ T cell-mediated GVHD in animal model: OPN promoted the migration and infiltration of naive and alloreactive CD8(+) T cells into host organs; it also facilitated activation and viability of donor-derived CD8(+) T cells via synergizing with CD3 signaling. This findings could validate OPN as a potential target in GVHD prevention [56]. As mentioned above, MMF is an important regimen in controlling GVHD, yet the therapeutic effect of MMF varies in patients. Huang et al. firstly reported the presence of the IMPDH1 IVS8-106 G/G genotype of Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH, target enzyme of MMF) in recipients was associated with a significantly higher incidence of aGVHD than other genotypes, in both unrelated and sibling transplantation cohorts [57]. This finding would contribute to the individualized therapy of GVHD according to gene polymorphism.

There are also many promising pre-clinical studies focused on the potential application of immune cells in controlling GVHD, such as umbilical cord blood (CB) derived stromal cells [58], ex vivo expanded CB CD4 + CD25+ Foxp 3+ regulatory T cells [59], as well as CXCR4-transduced MSCs, which maintained their immunosuppressive capacity and showed enhanced migration capacity in vitro, thus controlled the occurrence of GVHD more effectively [60].

In short, the progression of these basic and pre-clinical studies would hopefully ameliorate the clinic practices of controlling GVHD in near future.

Modified HSCT for elderly patients

The outcome of transplantation in patients older than 60 years of age remains unsatisfactory with a low complete remission (CR) rate and poor overall survival (OS) due to prolonged pancytopenia and an elevated chemotherapy-related mortality, etc. [61]. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning shows some curative effects for acute leukemia in elderly patients; however, the transplant comorbidities associated with GVHD and infection remain obstacles for this population [62].

Mouse models infused with high doses of G-CSF-mobilized allogeneic spleen cells after cytarabine chemotherapy without immunosuppressive pretreatment exhibited rapid hematopoietic recovery and persistent microchimerism without GVHD. Ai and colleagues designed a clinical control study to show the superiority of "mini-HSCT" over chemotherapy for elderly patients suffering from AML. This HSCT protocol mainly consisted of induction chemotherapy plus the infusion of HLA-mismatched G-PBSCs. Patients who received this treatment had a higher complete remission rate and disease-free survival over 2 years with no observable GVHD. These results indicate that G-PBSCs in combination with conventional chemotherapy may provide a promising treatment method for AML in elderly patients. This finding warrants further multi-center studies to confirm the results and determine if the same method can be applied in the treatment of ALL or other hematopoietic malignancies [63]. Besides, mechanism of "mini-HSCT" remains to be investigated.

Prospects for the HSCT in China

As mentioned above, multi-center prospective studies and researches connecting "bench to bed" are essential to promote the development of HSCT in China. Actually, there have been successful multi-center trials conducted in general hematology and molecular diagnostics, such as the prospective study "Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Treatment of Acute Leukemia" supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program (Program 863). Nevertheless, many challenges remain in the HSCT field: (1) Compared with many well developed international registries, for example, the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), the Chinese Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Association must make considerable progress in establishing itself as a leader in clinical trials in addition to its role in data management [2]. (2) Standardization would contribute to the improvement and modification of the entire system by allowing results from multiple centers to be compared. However, standardized practices are associated with more precise diagnoses, risk stratification, and corresponding individualized treatment rather than solitary therapies that vary from center to center. The dissemination of techniques is more difficult from experienced centers to smaller HSCT units due to the complexity of the HSCT system, which requires more experienced doctors and diagnostic technologies. (3) Benefit-sharing mechanisms are essential to the success of multi-center clinical trials. A well-developed system would allow all participating units to access data and analyze results from different angles. On the other hand, some experienced centers or institutes have the responsibility to lead clinical research programs applying for financial support, such as the key programs 973 and 863 of China, and to develop well-organized trials.

Next, two strategies can be employed to promote the connection between basic research and clinical practice in the field of Chinese HSCT. Firstly, Chinese researchers must make significant progress in identifying the underlying mechanisms of well-developed clinical models, such as haplo-HSCT. This unique diagnosis and treatment system in turn provides a perfect opportunity to analyze and compare the differences among clinical and animal models. Secondly, translational researchers must pursue promising cellular or animal experiments. For example, researchers from Jilin University, China, found that IFN-γ promotes graft-versus-leukemia effects without directly interacting with leukemia cells in mice after HSCT [48]. Therefore, it would be very interesting to investigate the potential enhancement of GVL effects in DLI or reduced intensity HSCT in patients by manipulation of IFN-γ.

In summary, it would be very meaningful for Chinese scholars to participate in translational researches of clinical significance, such as immune tolerance in HLA-mismatched HSCT, the distinction between GVHD and GVL, and the association between infection and chronic immunologic imbalance.

Conclusion

China has made substantial progress in the field of allo-HSCT during the past three decades, particularly in the clinical applications and mechanism researches of haplo-HSCT system, strategies to overcome relapse and GVHD, and modified HSCT for elderly patients. With the development of multi-center clinical trials and advances in translational research, these unique fields of allo-HSCT in China will have a promising future and contribute more to the world HSCT system.

Abbreviations

HSCT: 

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BMT: 

bone marrow transplantation

GVHD: 

Graft versus host disease

CIBMTR: 

Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

Allo: 

Allogeneic

ATG: 

Antithymocyte globulin

G-BM: 

G-CSF-primed bone marrow harvest

G-PB: 

G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell harvest

MRD: 

Minimal residual disease

mDLI: 

Modified donor lymphocyte infusion

MSCs: 

Mesenchymal stem cells

CR: 

Complete remission

OS: 

Overall survival

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No. 30971292), Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China(Grant No. 20110001110039), Natural Science Foundation of Beijing(Grant No. 7122193).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

References

  1. Lu DP, Guo NL, Jin NR, Zheng H, Lu XJ, Shi Q, Shan FX, Jiang B, Tang H, Liu MY: Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of leukemia. Chin Med J (Engl). 1990, 103: 125-130.Google Scholar
  2. Xu LP, Huang XJ: Current status and development of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China: a report from Chinese Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Register Group. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011, 124: 2548-2555.Google Scholar
  3. Pasquini MCWZ: Current use and outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: CIBMTR Summary Slides, 2011. [http://www.cibmtr.org]
  4. Jiang Q, Xu LP, Liu DH, Liu KY, Chen SS, Jiang B, Jiang H, Chen H, Chen YH, Han W et al: Imatinib mesylate versus allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in the accelerated phase. Blood. 2011, 117: 3032-3040. 10.1182/blood-2010-09-308510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang XJ: Current status of haploidentical stem cell transplantation for leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2008, 1: 27-10.1186/1756-8722-1-27.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fuchs EJ, Huang XJ, Miller JS: HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010, 16: S57-S63. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.10.032.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Reisner Y, Hagin D, Martelli MF: Haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation: current status and future perspectives. Blood. 2011, 118: 6006-6017. 10.1182/blood-2011-07-338822.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aversa F, Terenzi A, Tabilio A, Falzetti F, Carotti A, Ballanti S, Felicini R, Falcinelli F, Velardi A, Ruggeri L et al: Full haplotype-mismatched hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a phase II study in patients with acute leukemia at high risk of relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 3447-3454. 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunstein CG, Fuchs EJ, Carter SL, Karanes C, Costa LJ, Wu J, Devine SM, Wingard JR, Aljitawi OS, Cutler CS et al: Alternative donor transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning: results of parallel phase 2 trials using partially HLA-mismatched related bone marrow or unrelated double umbilical cord blood grafts. Blood. 2011, 118: 282-288. 10.1182/blood-2011-03-344853.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rizzieri DA, Koh LP, Long GD, Gasparetto C, Sullivan KM, Horwitz M, Chute J, Smith C, Gong JZ, Lagoo A et al: Partially matched, nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation: clinical outcomes and immune reconstitution. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 690-697. 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.0953.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies JK, Gribben JG, Brennan LL, Yuk D, Nadler LM, Guinan EC: Outcome of alloanergized haploidentical bone marrow transplantation after ex vivo costimulatory blockade: results of 2 phase 1 studies. Blood. 2008, 112: 2232-2241. 10.1182/blood-2008-03-143636.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Federmann B, Bornhauser M, Kordelas L, Beelen DW, Stuhler G, Schwerdtfeger R, Stelljes M, Behre G, Christopeit M, Faul C et al: Results of a Phase II Study of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HHCT) in Adults Using Reduced Intensity Conditioning and CD3/CD19-Depleted Grafts: clinical outcome and immune reconstitution. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2009, 114: 1203-Google Scholar
  13. Kurokawa T, Ishiyama K, Ozaki J, Yamashita Y, Iwaki N, Saito C, Arahata M, Kaya H, Yoshida T: Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to adults with hematologic malignancies: analysis of 66 cases at a single Japanese center. Int J Hematol. 2010, 91: 661-669. 10.1007/s12185-010-0561-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang XJ: Long Term Follow-up of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation without in Vitro T Cell Depletion for the Treatment of Hematological Malignancies: 9-Year Experience of a Single Center. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2011, 118: 839-Google Scholar
  15. Lee KH, Lee JH, Kim DY, Seol M, Lee YS, Kang YA, Jeon M, Hwang HJ, Jung AR, Kim SH et al: Reduced-intensity conditioning therapy with busulfan, fludarabine, and antithymocyte globulin for HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2011, 118: 2609-2617. 10.1182/blood-2011-02-339838.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang W, Li H, Gao C, Bo J, Wang Q, Zhao Y, Jing Y, Wang S, Zhu H, Dou L et al: Unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for high-risk hematologic malignancies. Transfusion. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03478.xGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong JL: A brief introduction of the Chinese Marrow Donor Program. Hong Kong Med J. 2009, 15: 45-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang XJ, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Chen H, Han W, Chen YH, Wang JZ, Gao ZY, Zhang YC et al: Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T-cell depletion for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006, 38: 291-297. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705445.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lu DP, Dong L, Wu T, Huang XJ, Zhang MJ, Han W, Chen H, Liu DH, Gao ZY, Chen YH et al: Conditioning including antithymocyte globulin followed by unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical blood and marrow transplantation can achieve comparable outcomes with HLA-identical sibling transplantation. Blood. 2006, 107: 3065-3073. 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Xiao-Jun H, Lan-Ping X, Kai-Yan L, Dai-Hong L, Huan C, Wei H, Yu-Hong C, Jing-Zhi W, Yao C, Xiao-Hui Z et al: HLA-mismatched/haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T cell depletion for chronic myeloid leukemia: improved outcomes in patients in accelerated phase and blast crisis phase. Ann Med. 2008, 40: 444-455. 10.1080/07853890801908903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Xiao-Jun H, Lan-Ping X, Kai-Yan L, Dai-Hong L, Yu W, Huan C, Yu-Hong C, Wei H, Jing-Zhi W, Yao C et al: Partially matched related donor transplantation can achieve outcomes comparable with unrelated donor transplantation for patients with hematologic malignancies. clin cancer res. 2009, 15: 4777-4783. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0691.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang Y, Liu DH, Xu LP, Liu KY, Chen H, Chen YH, Han W, Shi HX, Huang XJ: Superior graft-versus-leukemia effect associated with transplantation of haploidentical compared with HLA-identical sibling donor grafts for high-risk acute leukemia: an historic comparison. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011, 17: 821-830. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.08.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Guo M, Sun Z, Sun QY, Han Q, Yu CL, Wang DH, Qiao JH, Chen B, Sun WJ, Hu KX et al: A modified haploidentical nonmyeloablative transplantation without T cell depletion for high-risk acute leukemia: successful engraftment and mild GVHD. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009, 15: 930-937. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.04.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Han W, Huang XJ, Liu KY, Xu LP, Liu DH, Chen H, Zhang XH, Chen YH, Wang FR, Wang Y: The efficacy and safety of mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of severe aplastic anemia. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2011, 50: 287-290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee KW, Oh DH, Lee C, Yang SY: Allelic and haplotypic diversity of HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 genes in the Korean population. Tissue Antigens. 2005, 65: 437-447. 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2005.00386.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Okamoto S: Current status of Japan marrow donor program (JMDP) and its roles in international cooperation. Int J Hematol. 2002, 76 (Suppl 1): 310-311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Trachtenberg E, Vinson M, Hayes E, Hsu YM, Houtchens K, Erlich H, Klitz W, Hsia Y, Hollenbach J: HLA class I (A, B, C) and class II (DRB1, DQA1, DQB1, DPB1) alleles and haplotypes in the Han from southern China. Tissue Antigens. 2007, 70: 455-463. 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2007.00932.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu GG, Deng ZH, Gao SQ, Cheng LH, Jin SZ, Zhou D, Li Z, Zou HY, Zhang X, Wei TL et al: Study of HLA polymorphism in the 6965 Han bone marrow registry donors. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2004, 25: 473-477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Buhler S, Sanchez-Mazas A: HLA DNA sequence variation among human populations: molecular signatures of demographic and selective events. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e14643-10.1371/journal.pone.0014643.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jun HX, Jun CY, Yu ZX: In vivo induction of T-cell hyporesponsiveness and alteration of immunological cells of bone marrow grafts using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Haematologica. 2004, 89: 1517-1524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jun HX, Jun CY, Yu ZX: A direct comparison of immunological characteristics of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-primed bone marrow grafts and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood grafts. Haematologica. 2005, 90: 715-716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang XJ, Chang YJ, Zhao XY: Maintaining hyporesponsiveness and polarization potential of T cells after in vitro mixture of G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood grafts and G-CSF primed bone marrow grafts in different proportions. Transpl Immunol. 2007, 17: 193-197. 10.1016/j.trim.2006.10.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Feng X, Kajigaya S, Solomou EE, Keyvanfar K, Xu X, Raghavachari N, Munson PJ, Herndon TM, Chen J, Young NS: Rabbit ATG but not horse ATG promotes expansion of functional CD4 + CD25highFOXP3+ regulatory T cells in vitro. Blood. 2008, 111: 3675-3683. 10.1182/blood-2008-01-130146.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruggeri L, Capanni M, Urbani E, Perruccio K, Shlomchik WD, Tosti A, Posati S, Rogaia D, Frassoni F, Aversa F : Effectiveness of donor natural killer cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants. Science. 2002, 295: 2097-2100. 10.1126/science.1068440.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Huang XJ, Zhao XY, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP: Deleterious effects of KIR ligand incompatibility on clinical outcomes in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T-cell depletion. Leukemia. 2007, 21: 848-851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Chang YJ, Zhao XY, Huang XJ: Effects of the NK cell recovery on outcomes of unmanipulated haploidentical blood and marrow transplantation for patients with hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008, 14: 323-334. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.12.497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Xiao H, Shi J, Luo Y, Tan Y, He J, Xie W, Zhang L, Wang Y, Liu L, Wu K et al: First report of multiple CEBPA mutations contributing to donor origin of leukemia relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2011, 117: 5257-5260. 10.1182/blood-2010-12-326322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Diamond HR, Ornellas MH, Orfao A, Gomes BE, Campos MM, Fernandez TS, da Silva RI, Alves G, Lage C, da Silva DA et al: Acute myeloid leukemia of donor origin after allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a sibling who harbors germline XPD and XRCC3 homozygous polymorphisms. J Hematol Oncol. 2011, 4: 39-10.1186/1756-8722-4-39.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang XJ: Immunomodulatory strategies for relapse after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in hematologic malignancy patients. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2011, 24: 351-358. 10.1016/j.beha.2011.04.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kolb HJ, Schattenberg A, Goldman JM, Hertenstein B, Jacobsen N, Arcese W, Ljungman P, Ferrant A, Verdonck L, Niederwieser D et al: Graft-versus-leukemia effect of donor lymphocyte transfusions in marrow grafted patients. Blood. 1995, 86: 2041-2050.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Huang XJ, Wang Y, Liu DH, Xu LP, Liu KY, Chen H, Chen YH, Han W, Shi HX: Administration of short-term immunosuppressive agents after DLI reduces the incidence of DLI-associated acute GVHD without influencing the GVL effect. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009, 44: 309-316. 10.1038/bmt.2009.26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Huang X, Guo N, Ren H, Zhang Y, Gao Z, Lu D: An improved anti-leukemic effect achieved with donor progenitor cell infusion for relapse patients after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Chin Med J (Engl). 2003, 116: 736-741.Google Scholar
  43. Huang XJ, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Chen H, Han W: Donor lymphocyte infusion for the treatment of leukemia relapse after HLA-mismatched/haploidentical T-cell-replete hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2007, 92: 414-417. 10.3324/haematol.10570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Huang XJ, Liu DH, Xu LP, Chen H, Han W, Liu KY, Lu DP: Prophylactic infusion of donor granulocyte colony stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells after allogeneic hematological stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk leukemia. Leukemia. 2006, 20: 365-368. 10.1038/sj.leu.2403995.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Huang XJ, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Chen YH, Wang Y, Han W, Chen H: Modified donor lymphocyte infusion after HLA-mismatched/haploidentical T cell-replete hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for prophylaxis of relapse of leukemia in patients with advanced leukemia. J Clin Immunol. 2008, 28: 276-283. 10.1007/s10875-007-9166-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Yan CH, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Liu YR, Chen H, Han W, Wang Y, Qin YZ, Huang XJ: Risk stratification-directed donor lymphocyte infusion could reduce relapse of standard-risk acute leukemia patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012, doi:10.1182/blood-2011-09-380386Google Scholar
  47. Huang XJ, Wang Y, Liu DH, Xu LP, Chen H, Chen YH, Han W, Shi HX, Liu KY: Modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) for the prophylaxis of leukemia relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced leukemia-feasibility and safety study. J Clin Immunol. 2008, 28: 390-397. 10.1007/s10875-008-9193-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang Y, Wang H, Yu H, Yeap BY, Liang T, Wang G, Cheng T, Yang YG: IFN-gamma promotes graft-versus-leukemia effects without directly interacting with leukemia cells in mice after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2011, 118: 3721-3724. 10.1182/blood-2010-05-283887.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang Y, Xu LP, Liu KY, Liu DH, Wang J, Chen H, Chen YH, Han W, Huang XJ: Low-dose MTX combined with low-dose methylprednisolone as a first-line therapy for the treatment of acute GVHD: safety and feasibility. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011, 46: 892-898. 10.1038/bmt.2010.197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang Y, Xu LP, Liu DH, Chen H, Chen YH, Han W, Liu KY, Huang XJ: First-line therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease that includes low-dose methotrexate is associated with a high response rate. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009, 15: 505-511. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.12.493.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolff D, Schleuning M, von Harsdorf S, Bacher U, Gerbitz A, Stadler M, Ayuk F, Kiani A, Schwerdtfeger R, Vogelsang GB et al: Consensus Conference on Clinical Practice in Chronic GVHD: Second-Line Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011, 17: 1-17. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.05.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lai Y, Ma J, Schwarzenberger P, Li W, Cai Z, Zhou J, Peng Z, Yang J, Luo L, Luo J et al: Combination of CsA, MTX and low-dose, short-course mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009, 43: 61-67. 10.1038/bmt.2008.265.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Fang J, Hu C, Hong M, Wu Q, You Y, Zhong Z, Li W, Zou P, Hu Y, Xia L: Prophylactic Effects of Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonists against Graft-versus-Host Disease following Unrelated Donor Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.09.005Google Scholar
  54. Ning H, Yang F, Jiang M, Hu L, Feng K, Zhang J, Yu Z, Li B, Xu C, Li Y et al: The correlation between cotransplantation of mesenchymal stem cells and higher recurrence rate in hematologic malignancy patients: outcome of a pilot clinical study. Leukemia. 2008, 22: 593-599. 10.1038/sj.leu.2405090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Weng JY, Du X, Geng SX, Peng YW, Wang Z, Lu ZS, Wu SJ, Luo CW, Guo R, Ling W et al: Mesenchymal stem cell as salvage treatment for refractory chronic GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010, 45: 1732-1740. 10.1038/bmt.2010.195.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhao F, Zhang Y, Wang H, Jin M, He S, Shi Y, Guo Y: Blockade of osteopontin reduces alloreactive CD8+ T cell-mediated graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2011, 117: 1723-1733. 10.1182/blood-2010-04-281659.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Cao W, Xiao H, Lai X, Luo Y, Shi J, Tan Y, Zheng W, He J, Xie W, Li L et al: Genetic variations in the mycophenolate mofetil target enzyme are associated with acute GVHD risk after related and unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012, 18: 273-279. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.06.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang C, Chen XH, Zhang X, Gao L, Kong PY, Peng XG, Liang X, Gong Y, Wang QY: Human umbilical cord blood-derived stromal cells, a new resource in the suppression of acute graft-versus-host disease in haploidentical stem cell transplantation in sublethally irradiated mice. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286: 13723-13732. 10.1074/jbc.M110.144691.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang J, Fan H, Hao J, Ren Y, Chen L, Li G, Xie R, Yang Y, Qian K, Liu M: Amelioration of acute graft-versus-host disease by adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded human cord blood CD4 + CD25+ forkhead box protein 3+ regulatory T cells is associated with the polarization of Treg/Th17 balance in a mouse model. Transfusion. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03448.xGoogle Scholar
  60. Chen W, Li M, Li Z, Yan Z, Cheng H, Pan B, Cao J, Chen C, Zeng L, Xu K: CXCR4-transduced mesenchymal stem cells protect mice against graft-versus-host disease. Immunol Lett. 2012, doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2012.01.015Google Scholar
  61. Marks DI: Treating the "older" adult with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2010, 2010: 13-20. 10.1182/asheducation-2010.1.13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Estey E, de Lima M, Tibes R, Pierce S, Kantarjian H, Champlin R, Giralt S: Prospective feasibility analysis of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Blood. 2007, 109: 1395-1400. 10.1182/blood-2006-05-021907.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Guo M, Hu KX, Yu CL, Sun QY, Qiao JH, Wang DH, Liu GX, Sun WJ, Wei L, Sun XD et al: Infusion of HLA-mismatched peripheral blood stem cells improves the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients. Blood. 2011, 117: 936-941. 10.1182/blood-2010-06-288506.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lv and Huang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.