Skip to main content

Targeting the Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction to disrupt Hsp90 chaperone machinery


Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a critical molecular chaperone protein that regulates the folding, maturation, and stability of a wide variety of proteins. In recent years, the development of Hsp90-directed inhibitors has grown rapidly, and many of these inhibitors have entered clinical trials. In parallel, the functional dissection of the Hsp90 chaperone machinery has highlighted the activity disruption of Hsp90 co-chaperone as a potential target. With the roles of Hsp90 co-chaperones being elucidated, cell division cycle 37 (Cdc37), a ubiquitous co-chaperone of Hsp90 that directs the selective client proteins into the Hsp90 chaperone cycle, shows great promise. Moreover, the Hsp90-Cdc37-client interaction contributes to the regulation of cellular response and cellular growth and is more essential to tumor tissues than normal tissues. Herein, we discuss the current understanding of the clients of Hsp90-Cdc37, the interaction of Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein, and the therapeutic possibilities of targeting Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction as a strategy to inhibit Hsp90 chaperone machinery to present new insights on alternative ways of inhibiting Hsp90 chaperone machinery.


Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a critically conserved protein and one of the major molecular chaperones within eukaryotic cells [1]. It is the key component of the Hsp90 chaperone machinery, which facilitates protein folding and regulates the stabilization and activity of a large number of client proteins [2,3,4]. Hsp90 client proteins originate from distinct functional classes, including transcription factors (e.g., HIF1α, ATF3, and p53), steroid hormone receptors (e.g., estrogen receptor, glucocorticoid receptor, and progesterone receptor), and kinases (e.g., EGFR, B-raf, and SRC). Many of these client proteins are commonly overexpressed and/or frequently mutated in cancer cells [5,6,7]. Therefore, targeting Hsp90 offers a promising multi-therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment.

Hsp90 family contains five subfamilies, which include cytosolic HSP90A, endoplasmic reticulum-localized HSP90B, chloroplast HSP90C, mitochondrial TNFR-associated protein, and bacterial high-temperature protein G [2, 8]. In this review, we use the term Hsp90 to refer to these Hsp90 members when we do not explicitly distinguish the differences between them. Hsp90 functions as a homodimer, and each Hsp90 monomer comprises three critical conserved domains. The amino-terminal domain that is also referred to as N-terminal domain mediates its ATP binding activity, the middle domain is the center of ATP hydrolysis and client binding, and the carboxy-terminal domain that is also referred to as the C-terminal domain is responsible for its dimerization [2, 9, 10]. ATP binding results in the rearrangement of the three domains, which induces a shift from an open conformation to a closed conformation [11]. The ATPase activity of Hsp90 is thought to be essential for the chaperone cycle of Hsp90 chaperone machinery [2]. Hsp90-directed agents that block ATP binding to Hsp90 have been established, such as geldanamycin (GM)-based inhibitors (GM, 17-AAG, 17-DMAG, and IPI-504), purine-based inhibitors (PU3, BIIBO21, PU-H71, MPC-3100, and CUDC-305), and radicicol-based inhibitors (NVP-AUY922, STA-9090, AT-13387, and KW-2478) [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Preclinical data have suggested Hsp90 as a potential anticancer target; however, the clinical trials have been halted or postponed in many cases. So far, none of the inhibitors for Hsp90 intervention have been approved for clinical application, which may be due to toxicity and heat shock response upon clinical treatment [2, 18, 19]. As a consequence, the strategy of blocking Hsp90’s ATP-binding activity for the development of Hsp90 inhibitor is still under controversy.

Alongside the Hsp90 chaperone, co-chaperones are crucial regulators that drives the diverse functions of Hsp90 chaperone machinery. These co-chaperones, such as Hsp70/Hsp90 organizing protein (HOP), cell division cycle 37 (Cdc37), small glutamine-rich TPR-containing protein alpha (SGTA), TPR repeat-containing protein associated with Hsp90 (TAH1), activator of Hsp90 ATPase protein 1 (AHA1), protein phosphatase 5 (PP5), FK506-binding protein 5 (FKBP5), carboxyl terminus of HSC70-interacting protein (CHIP), cyclophilin 40 (CYP40), p23, tetratricopeptide repeat domain 4 (TTC4), and uncoordinated mutant number 45 (Unc45), in concert with Hsp90 to form transient complexes not only mediate the Hsp90 ATPase cycle but also direct a broad range of specific clients to Hsp90 [2]. Among them, Cdc37, also known as p50, is one of the best-studied co-chaperones of Hsp90 [20,21,22,23] and proposed to be exclusively associated with protein kinases [24, 25]. Recent progress has allowed the interactions of Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein to be defined [20, 26, 27]. Herein, we discuss the current understanding of the clients of Hsp90-Cdc37, the interaction of Hsp90-Cdc37-client, and the prospects of targeting Hsp90-Cdc37-client interaction as a target for therapeutic intervention of the Hsp90 chaperone machinery.

The client proteins of Hsp90-Cdc37

Cdc37, first identified as a cell cycle protein in 1980 [28], was found to be an important intracellular cofactor of Hsp90 in 1981 [25, 29]. As a specific co-chaperone, Cdc37 is a selectively acquired recruiter for Hsp90 chaperone machinery to control the entry of diverse protein kinases [30]. The majority of kinase proteins interact with both Hsp90 and its co-chaperone Cdc37, and the Hsp90-mediated maturation of kinases is proposed to be strictly dependent on Cdc37 [20, 26]. To date, nearly 300 client proteins of Hsp90-Cdc37, which include diverse proteins such as EGFR, SRC, B-raf, AKT1, and CDK4, have been found [20, 31]. To obtain a better understanding of the biological function and molecular interaction of the client proteins of Hsp90-Cdc37, a stand-alone software tool FunRich (version 3.0), which is mainly used for the functional enrichment and interaction network analysis, was applied [32]. A well-annotated list of Hsp90-Cdc37 client proteins was maintained and updated by the Picard laboratory, a research group that focus on the development of Hsp90 (see the online link: [31], and 267 proteins were successfully matched with the FunRich database (human only). Overall, our results demonstrated that the molecular functions of these proteins were mainly implicated in regulation of protein serine/threonine kinase activity (143 proteins), and the biological processes in which they mainly participated were cell communication (192 proteins) and signal transduction (214 proteins) (detailed data are shown in Additional file 1). These client proteins are involved in various biological pathways, such as the glypican pathway, IFN-γ pathway, TRAIL signaling pathway, ERBB receptor signaling pathway, and VEGF/VEGFR signaling network. Actually, most of the proteins do not operate alone but interact with each other and work in complexes while performing their functions in cellular progresses. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) plays a critical role in the signal transduction pathways and networks during diverse physiological processes [33]. In the present study, the PPI network visualization and its analysis were also performed, and 449 PPI pairs were formed by the 267 different client proteins (Fig. 1a). Among them, 29 client proteins, including SRC, EGFR, FYN, Raf-1, and AKT1, formed at least 10 pairs in the PPI network and were defined as core client proteins (Table 1). Different EGFR family members with various biological activities could form the ligand-triggered heterodimers with family members, resulting in activation of complex signals [34,35,36]. IGF1R was also identified to form heterodimers with insulin receptor (gene symbol: IRSNN) and EGFR family members, conferring resistance to homo-therapy [37, 38]. The Raf-1/B-raf-formed heterodimers exhibit highly increased kinase activity than the respective homodimers [39]. Clearly, an individual protein alone cannot be a simple predictor of drug efficiency; functional protein–protein dimers with distinct pharmacological properties are also required [40,41,42,43,44]. Herein, the complex protein network and sundry PPI pairs formed by these Hsp90-Cdc37 clients in turn heightened the understanding of Cdc37 as a key factor in Hsp90 chaperone machinery.

Fig. 1

The protein–protein interaction of Hsp90-Cdc37’s client proteins. Using the FunRich tool to analyze the protein–protein interaction of Hsp90-Cdc37’s client proteins. 449 PPI pairs are formed by these 267 proteins in total. PPI: protein–protein interaction

Table 1 The core client proteins. The 29 client proteins formed at least 10 pairs in the PPI network

The interaction of Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein

Various studies in recent years have helped determine how Cdc37 enables Hsp90 chaperone machinery to recognize specific client proteins progressively; however, the full-length structures of client protein with either Hsp90 or Cdc37 remain to be elucidated [1, 2, 27, 45]. Similar to Hsp90, Cdc37 contains three domains (N-terminal domain, M-domain, and the C-terminal domain) that function cooperatively [26, 27]. Cdc37 acts as a structural defect discriminator and a kinase sorting module in the Hsp90 chaperone machinery [46]. As shown in Fig. 2, Cdc37 first tests the proper substrates and establishes stable connection with the client protein to create a Cdc37-client protein binary complex. Then, the binary complex binds to Hsp90 to form a ternary complex. The formation of the Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein ternary complex finally facilitates client protein loading onto the Hsp90 chaperone machinery.

Fig. 2

A speculative model for the Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein cycle. Cdc37 first tests the proper substrates and establishes stable connection with the client protein to create a Cdc37-client protein binary complex. Then, the binary complex binds to Hsp90 to form a ternary complex. The formation of the Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein ternary complex finally facilitates client protein loading onto the Hsp90 chaperone machinery. It is worthy of note that Cdc37 will be phosphorylated by casein kinase 2 (CK2) at Ser13 before connecting with client proteins and dephosphorylated by the protein phosphatase 5 (PP5) before client protein release

Of note, Cdc37 will be phosphorylated by casein kinase 2 (CK2) at Ser13 before connecting with client proteins [47] and dephosphorylated by the protein phosphatase PP5 before client protein release [48]. Proper phosphoserine of Cdc37 at Ser13 is necessary for Hsp90 chaperone machinery to recognize the structural perturbation at the client protein domain and helps Cdc37 to stabilize its own structure and participate in the interaction with Hsp90 [27]. These works have heightened the understanding of the phosphorylation on Cdc37’s conformation and ability to bind to Hsp90. Besides phospho-Ser13 of Cdc37, previous studies have recognized GSGSFG, a glycine-rich motif, as a unique sequence that is necessary for the stable client protein’s interaction with Cdc37 [49, 50], and the adjoining loop linking the α-C-helix to the β4-strand and the α-C-helix of the client protein also appears to be the primary determinant to be recognized by Cdc37 [51]. The difference of C-terminal portions within client proteins takes part in determining the sharp affinity activity with Cdc37, which may explain the different affinities between CDK4 (Cdc37-dependent protein) and CDK2 (non-Cdc37-dependent protein) despite the similar glycine-rich loop in the N-terminal portions [49]. Nevertheless, based on the analysis using FunRich tool, more than 50% (P < 0.001) of the client proteins contain the serine/threonine kinase catalytic domain (S-TKc), suggesting that this kind of domain may be preferable than others. Even though the definitive features of Cdc37 and client proteins have not yet been clearly illustrated, several key portions are crucial for the physical association of client protein and Cdc37 and determine the triage process regarding Cdc37’s dependence.

As for the binding site of Cdc37 and Hsp90, the classic one in humans is the middle domain of Cdc37 bond to the N-terminal domain of Hsp90 (shown in Fig. 2). Cdc37 uses the N-terminal domain to test the proper substrates and applies its C-terminal region to build the stable connection with the client protein. The Cdc37-client protein complex will then bind to the N-terminal domain of Hsp90 via the M-domain of Cdc37 [1, 2, 27, 45]. Specifically, the residues 127–163 within the middle domain of Cdc37 were recognized as the inter-domain switch to sense the proper conformation of Hsp90 and regulate the binding activity of Cdc37-client protein complex with Hsp90 [52]. In addition, a second interaction site of Hsp90 for Cdc37 within Caenorhabditis elegans (CeCdc37) was uncovered recently, which is regulated by the binding of N-terminal domain of CeCdc37 to the middle domain of Hsp90 [30, 53]. These two interactions utilized by Cdc37 within different species seem to function relevantly and mediate the conformational change and the ATPase activity of Hsp90.

Most recently, the client protein within the Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein ternary complex was found to bind to the separated sides of Hsp90 using its two elongated and non-native lobes [27]. This structure suggested that the client protein remains in an uncompleted folded status even after the conformation of the Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein ternary complex, and it still relies on the subsequent function of Hsp90 to reach maturity. This finding provides further evidence for the heavy dependence of client protein maturation on the cooperation of Cdc37 and Hsp90.

Targeting Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction to block Hsp90 chaperone machinery

As the majority of kinases are adversely affected by Hsp90-Cdc37, drug design targeting Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction has been highlighted as a promising novel strategy. Investigating technically feasible methods to modulate Hsp90-Cdc37 activity is of considerable importance. Based on the nature of Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction, there are three potential categories that are likely to disrupt the function of Hsp90 chaperone machinery: targeting Cdc37, Cdc37-client protein interaction, and Hsp90-Cdc37 interaction.

Targeting Cdc37

Cdc37 has an increased level in proliferating tissues and organs and is highly expressed in certain tumors, such as prostate cancer [54]. Therefore, the tumor cells, rather than normal cells, have increasing dependency on the Cdc37 level. Moreover, as the recognizer of client protein being tied to the Hsp90 chaperone system, Cdc37 is primarily and specifically interacted with the kinase protein, whereas Hsp90 is widely associated with many classes of client proteins (transcription factors, steroid hormone receptors, and kinases) [55]. The absence of Cdc37 can only disrupt the interactions with kinase clients but not the interactions with non-kinase clients [20, 56]. Cdc37 is needed for both maturation and activation of client proteins, which may be dependent on the differences of species and tissue. Silencing Cdc37 using shRNA disrupts the Hsp90 chaperone machinery via impairing the association of client protein with Hsp90 and prevents protein maturation, which may subsequently induce a proteasomal degradation of client proteins, and finally suppresses the proliferation of human colon cancer cells [56]. Additionally, depletion of Cdc37 could also block the activities of many client proteins, instead of global degradation of client proteins. This blockage resulted in the suppression of multiple pathways (e.g., MAPKs and androgen-induced pathways) and induced growth inhibition in human prostate cancer cells [57]. Given the oncogenic role of many of these client proteins (e.g., EGFR, SRC, and Raf-1), this specificity of Cdc37, rather than that of Hsp90, provides a potential and available therapeutic window for Cdc37-targeted therapy. The current studies of targeting Cdc37 were mainly focused on the application of the relevant gene silencers (e.g., shRNA/siRNA). With the development of microRNA for protein mediation [58], regulating microRNA targeting Cdc37 to decrease Cedc37 should also be taken into consideration.

Targeting Cdc37-client interaction

As mentioned above, phosphorylated Cdc37 at the conserved Ser13 site is a prerequisite for the efficient binding activity of Cdc37 to protein kinases and crucial for the recruitment of the protein kinase-Cdc37 complex to Hsp90 [47, 59, 60]. The phosphorylation of Cdc37 (Ser13) is mediated by CK2 [61, 62]. Specific inhibition of CK2 with its chemical inhibitor, 4,5,6,7-tetrabromobenzotriazole, could reduce the phosphorylation of Cdc37 and the protein levels of Cdc37-dependent protein kinases [59]. Besides the phosphorylation, the dephosphorylation of Cdc37 is pivotal for its activation as well. PP5, a serine/threonine-protein phosphatase that regulates hormone- and stress-induced cellular signaling [48, 63, 64], mediates Cdc37 dephosphorylation and is critically dependent for client protein release. Dephosphorylation is also important for the reversal of Cdc37’s resistance to nonspecific phosphatases and constitutive phosphorylation [48, 65]. These results show the regulatory mechanisms of Cdc37 activity and the molecular basis for the ability of CK2 and PP5 to regulate cellular functions of the Cdc37-client protein complex. Moreover, the finding that the phosphatase ability of PP5 is active only when it is interacting with proteins (e.g., Hsp90) via its TPR domain [66] has provided further evidence for targeting PP5 as a relatively specific means of blocking Hsp90 chaperone machinery.

Specific ATP-competitive kinase inhibitors may be another kind of candidates that block Cdc37 interaction with protein kinases. The kinase inhibitors (e.g., the B-raf inhibitor vemurafenib and the EGFR/HER2 inhibitor lapatinib) were found to antagonize Cdc37 interaction with target kinases not only by inducing the chaperone deprivation of nascent protein but also by disrupting the formed Hsp90-Cdc37-kinase complex. This Cdc37 antagonism finally leads to kinase depletion in a manner similar to that of Hsp90 inhibitor. Thus, the kinase inhibitors, besides the role that they are meant to play, also seem to act as antagonists of PPI within the Hsp90 molecular chaperone machinery [67]. These results also suggest that in some dependent tumor cells, Cdc37 chaperone deprivation, at least in part, contributes to the efficiency of targeted kinase inhibitors.

Targeting Hsp90-Cdc37 interaction

During the past few years, several kinds of disruptors toward the association of Hsp90 and Cdc37 have been discovered, as shown in Table 2. The underlying mechanisms of this kind of compounds mainly focus on the replacement of key residue–residue interaction between Hsp90 and Cdc37. Most of these disruptors are natural products, such as celastrol [68, 69], sulforaphane [70], FW-04-806 [71, 72], withaferin A [73,74,75], kongensin A [76, 77], and platycodin D [78, 79]. In addition to the small molecules, the peptide-derived disruptors also offer another way to block the interaction of Hsp90-Cdc37. For instance, the developed Cdc37-derived peptide Pep-1 exhibited competitive binding affinity to Hsp90 at the micromolar level though occupying the Cdc37 binding site. This binding subsequently leads to the disruption of Hsp90–Cdc37 PPI and the ATP bond to Hsp90 [80].

Table 2 Targeting the Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction to disrupt Hsp90 chaperone machinery


The Hsp90 chaperone machinery is known to be a multi-protein complex, which includes the chaperone (Hsp90) and co-chaperones (e.g., HOP, Cdc37, and AHA1). This chaperone machinery has been regarded as prime importance to cancer survival with its effort on assistance of general protein folding and prevention of protein misfolded or unfolded actions. Hsp90, the famous heat shock protein, is the key factor for this chaperone machinery and allows cancer cells to adapt to severe stress [55, 81]. In the past decade, tremendous efforts have been made to develop Hsp90 inhibitors as anticancer agents [2, 82, 83]. However, none of the directed Hsp90 inhibitors have achieved the goal and have been applied in clinical treatment [2, 18, 19]. Seeking for another alternative strategy to inhibit the Hsp90 chaperone machinery and achieve better therapeutic efficiency is thus urgent.

Being the crucial recognizer of protein kinases to tie to the Hsp90 system, Cdc37 may be a promising candidate target. Most of the client proteins of Hsp90-Cdc37 are highly involved in key signal transduction systems and regulate cellular activities [84,85,86]. Besides the well-known client proteins of Hsp90-Cdc37 (e.g., HER2, CDK4, CDK6, and AKT), the key signaling molecules of necroptosis, the activation of receptor-interacting protein kinases 1–3 (RIP1–3), were found to be dependent on the interaction with the Hsp90-Cdc37 complex [76, 87, 88], which may help to generate a new approach against tumors with apoptotic deficiency. Androgen receptor (AR) is not a kinase protein but is recognized as a specific client protein of Hsp90-Cdc37 [89]. Given the key role of AR for transcriptional mediation in prostate cancer, the feasibility of targeting Hsp90–Cdc37 activity to mediate AR may be useful for prostate cancer treatment. Nevertheless, the resistance to directed Hsp90 inhibitors could also be reversed by silencing Cdc37 via destabilization of client proteins. This evidence supports that the blockage of Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction can be an effective target for discovering novel inhibitors toward Hsp90 chaperone machinery and shows the potential to be applied in cancer treatment.

To date, several approaches are proven useful in blocking the association of Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein (as shown in Table 2); however, challenges remain. Firstly, the application of Cdc37-targeted intervention has not been fulfilled in vivo. To improve the stabilization and the transfection efficiency of RNA interference-Cdc37 [90] and to figure out the clear microRNA that targets Cdc37 will have superior therapeutic effect. Secondly, although the CK2 and PP5 are required for efficient phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of Cdc37, the CK2- or PP5-targeted therapies for clinical application are still under investigation [91]. Thirdly, the reported inhibitors of the Hsp90-Cdc37 complex so far are mainly natural products with poor selectivity, which may limit their potency to be drug candidates. The basic research of the Cdc37-derived peptides is still ongoing [92]. The structure modification of the current agents may provide further pharmacological properties of current agents while retaining target specificity of Hsp90-Cdc37 complex.

More still needs to be explored regarding the crucial role of Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction and its effectiveness as target for cancer treatment. As mentioned above, depletion of Cdc37 may lead to the decrease of cell survival signals through either the degradation of the client protein level or the inhibition of client protein activity [56, 57]. The inhibition of Hsp90–Cdc37 interaction by the platycodin D also caused distinct regulation of client proteins as demonstrated by decreased activity and conserved protein level of AKT [78, 93]. Thus we remain uncertain of the full information of cancer types mediated by the regulation of Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction. In addition, studies indicated the dysregulation of some client proteins obviously prefers certain cancer to other normal tissues. As AR is essential for the development of prostate cancer, and EGFR is a key factor for definite lung cancer, future research will be indispensable to pay attention to the stratification of patients before the application of Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein targeted therapy. Furthermore, it is not likely that agents that target Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction will be used as mono-therapy [56, 72, 78]. Rather, the known biological role and pre-clinical findings demonstrate that regulation of this complex will have more potential in the modulation of therapeutic response of other agents in certain cancers.

In conclusion, targeting Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction is a reasonable and alternative strategy to the blockage of Hsp90 chaperone machinery and is a promising target for the cancer therapy.



Activator of Hsp90 ATPase protein 1


Androgen receptor


Cell division cycle 37


Cdc37 within Caenorhabditis elegans


Carboxyl terminus of HSC70-interacting protein


Casein kinase 2


Cyclophilin 40


FK506-binding protein 5




Hsp70/Hsp90 organizing protein


Heat shock protein 90


Protein phosphatase 5


Protein–protein interaction


Receptor-interacting protein kinases 1–3


Small glutamine-rich TPR-containing protein alpha


Serine/threonine kinase catalytic domain


TPR repeat-containing protein associated with Hsp90


Tetratricopeptide repeat domain 4


Uncoordinated mutant number 45


  1. 1.

    Whitesell L, Lindquist SL. HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:761–72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Schopf FH, Biebl MM, Buchner J. The HSP90 chaperone machinery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:345–60.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Trepel J, Mollapour M, Giaccone G, Neckers L. Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:537–49.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhao RM, Davey M, Hsu YC, Kaplanek P, Tong A, Parsons AB, et al. Navigating the chaperone network: an integrative map of physical and genetic interactions mediated by the Hsp90 chaperone. Cell. 2005;120:715–27.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Young JC, Agashe VR, Siegers K, Hartl FU. Pathways of chaperone-mediated protein folding in the cytosol. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2004;5:781–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Takayama S, Reed JC, Homma S. Heat-shock proteins as regulators of apoptosis. Oncogene. 2003;22:9041–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wiech H, Buchner J, Zimmermann R, Jakob U. Hsp90 chaperones protein folding in vitro. Nature. 1992;358:169–70.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chen B, Zhong DB, Monteiro A. Comparative genomics and evolution of the HSP90 family of genes across all kingdoms of organisms. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:156.

  9. 9.

    Harris SF, Shiau AK, Agard DA. The crystal structure of the carboxy-terminal dimerization domain of htpG, the Escherichia coli Hsp90, reveals a potential substrate binding site. Structure. 2004;12:1087–97.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Karagoz GE, Duarte AMS, Ippel H, Uetrecht C, Sinnige T, van Rosmalen M, et al. N-terminal domain of human Hsp90 triggers binding to the cochaperone p23. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:580–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hessling M, Richter K, Buchner J. Dissection of the ATP-induced conformational cycle of the molecular chaperone Hsp90. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:287–93.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Prodromou C, Roe SM, OBrien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. Identification and structural characterization of the ATP/ADP-binding site in the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. Cell. 1997;90:65–75.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Panaretou B, Prodromou C, Roe SM, O'Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, et al. ATP binding and hydrolysis are essential to the function of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone in vivo. EMBO J. 1998;17:4829–36.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Roe SM, Prodromou C, O'Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. Structural basis for inhibition of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone by the antitumor antibiotics radicicol and geldanamycin. J Med Chem. 1999;42:260–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Soga S, Shiotsu Y, Akinaga S, Sharma SV. Development of radicicol analogues. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2003;3:359–69.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sharma SV, Agatsuma T, Nakano H. Targeting of the protein chaperone, HSP90, by the transformation suppressing agent, radicicol. Oncogene. 1998;16:2639–45.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chiosis G, Lucas B, Shtil A, Huezo H, Rosen N. Development of a purine-scaffold novel class of Hsp90 binders that inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells and induce the degradation of Her2 tyrosine kinase. Bioorgan Med Chem. 2002;10:3555–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pedersen KS, Kim GP, Foster NR, Wang-Gillam A, Erlichman C, McWilliams RR. Phase II trial of gemcitabine and tanespimycin (17AAG) in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a Mayo Clinic phase II consortium study. Invest New Drug. 2015;33:963–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Acquaviva J, He SQ, Sang J, Smith DL, Sequeira M, Zhang CH, et al. mTOR inhibition potentiates HSP90 inhibitor activity via cessation of HSP synthesis. Mol Cancer Res. 2014;12:703–13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Taipale M, Krykbaeva I, Koeva M, Kayatekin C, Westover KD, Karras GI, et al. Quantitative analysis of Hsp90-client interactions reveals principles of substrate recognition. Cell. 2012;150:987–1001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang L, Li L, Zhou ZH, Jiang ZY, You QD, Xu XL. Structure-based virtual screening and optimization of modulators targeting Hsp90-Cdc37 interaction. Eur J Med Chem. 2017;136:63–73.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Calderwood S. Cdc37 as a co-chaperone to Hsp90. Subcell Biochem. 2015;78:103–12.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gray PJ, Prince T, Cheng J, Stevenson MA, Calderwood SK. Targeting the oncogene and kinome chaperone CDC37. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:491–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Siligardi G, Panaretou B, Meyer P, Singh S, Woolfson DN, Piper PW, et al. Regulation of Hsp90 ATPase activity by the co-chaperone Cdc37p/p50cdc37. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:20151–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Oppermann H, Levinson W, Bishop JM. A cellular protein that associates with the transforming protein of Rous sarcoma virus is also a heat-shock protein. P Natl Acad Sci-Biol. 1981;78:1067–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Keramisanou D, Aboalroub A, Zhang ZM, Liu WJ, Marshall D, Diviney A, et al. Molecular mechanism of protein kinase recognition and sorting by the Hsp90 kinome-specific cochaperone Cdc37. Mol Cell. 2016;62:260–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Verba KA, Wang RYR, Arakawa A, Liu YX, Shirouzu M, Yokoyama S, et al. Atomic structure of Hsp90-Cdc37-Cdk4 reveals that Hsp90 traps and stabilizes an unfolded kinase. Science. 2016;352:1542–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Reed SI. The selection of S. cerevisiae mutants defective in the start event of cell division. Genetics. 1980;95:561–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Brugge JS, Darrow D. Rous sarcoma virus-induced phosphorylation of a 50,000-molecular weight cellular protein. Nature. 1982;295:250–3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Eckl JM, Scherr MJ, Freiburger L, Daake MA, Sattler M, Richter K. Hsp90 center dot Cdc37 complexes with protein kinases form cooperatively with multiple distinct interaction sites. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:30843–54.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cdc37 interacting proteins. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.

  32. 32.

    Pathan M, Keerthikumar S, Ang CS, Gangoda L, Quek CYJ, Williamson NA, et al. FunRich: an open access standalone functional enrichment and interaction network analysis tool. Proteomics. 2015;15:2597–601.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Stelzl U, Worm U, Lalowski M, Haenig C, Brembeck FH, Goehler H, et al. A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell. 2005;122:957–68.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ellebaek S, Brix S, Grandal M, Lantto J, Horak ID, Kragh M, et al. Pan-HERAn antibody mixture targeting EGFR, HER2 and HER3 abrogates preformed and ligand-induced EGFR homo- and heterodimers. Int J Cancer. 2016;139:2095–105.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Freeman MR. HER2/HER3 heterodimers in prostate cancer: whither HER1/EGFR? Cancer Cell. 2004;6:427–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hutcheson LR, Barrow D, Hasmann M, Nicholson RI. Induction of erbB3/EGFR heterodimers mediates resistance to pertuzumab in a tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:3373.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Massoner P, Ladurner-Rennau M, Eder IE, Klocker H. Insulin-like growth factors and insulin control a multifunctional signalling network of significant importance in cancer. Brit J Cancer. 2010;103:1479–84.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dziadziuszko R, Merrick DT, Witta SE, Mendoza AD, Szostakiewicz B, Szymanowska A, et al. Insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R) gene copy number is associated with survival in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison between IGF1R fluorescent in situ hybridization, protein expression, and mRNA expression. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2174–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rushworth LK, Hindley AD, O'Neill E, Kolch W. Regulation and role of Raf-1/B-Raf heterodimerization. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:2262–72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yuan WJ, Ding X, Wang Z, Yang BJ, Li XN, Zhang Y, et al. Two novel diterpenoid heterodimers, Bisebracteolasins A and B, from Euphorbia ebracteolata Hayata, and the cancer chemotherapeutic potential of Bisebracteolasin A. Sci Rep-Uk. 2017;7

  41. 41.

    Krogsgaard M, Li QJ, Sumen C, Huppa JB, Huse M, Davis MM. Agonist/endogenous peptide-MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity. Nature. 2005;434:238–43.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    AbdAlla S, Lother H, Quitterer U. AT(1)-receptor heterodimers show enhanced G-protein activation and altered receptor sequestration. Nature. 2000;407:94–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Westin S, Kurokawa R, Nolte RT, Wisely GB, McInerney EM, Rose DW, et al. Interactions controlling the assembly of nuclear-receptor heterodimers and co-activators. Nature. 1998;395:199–202.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Neer EJ, Smith TF. G protein heterodimers: new structures propel new questions. Cell. 1996;84:175–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mayer MP. Gymnastics of molecular chaperones. Mol Cell. 2010;39:321–31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gelis I, Keramisanou D, Aboalroub A. Protein kinase recognition and sorting by the HSP90 kinome-specific cochaperone CDC37. Biophys J. 2017;112:491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Shao JY, Prince T, Hartson SD, Matts RL. Phosphorylation of serine 13 is required for the proper function of the Hsp90 co-chaperone, Cdc37. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:38117–20.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Oberoi J, Dunn DM, Woodford MR, Mariotti L, Schulman J, Bourboulia D, et al. Structural and functional basis of protein phosphatase 5 substrate specificity. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:9009–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Terasawa K, Yoshimatsu K, Iemura S, Natsume T, Tanaka K, Minami Y. Cdc37 interacts with the glycine-rich loop of Hsp90 client kinases. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:3378–89.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Terasawa K, Minami Y. A client-binding site of Cdc37. FEBS J. 2005;272:4684–90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Prince T, Matts RL. Definition of protein kinase sequence motifs that trigger high affinity binding of Hsp90 and Cdc37. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:39975–81.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Shao JY, Irwin A, Hartson SD, Malts RL. Functional dissection of Cdc37: characterization of domain structure and amino acid residues critical for protein kinase binding. Biochemistry-Us. 2003;42:12577–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Eckl JM, Rutz DA, Haslbeck V, Zierer BK, Reinstein J, Richter K. Cdc37 (cell division cycle 37) restricts Hsp90 (heat shock protein 90) motility by interaction with N-terminal and middle domain binding sites. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:16032–42.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Stepanova L, Yang G, DeMayo F, Wheeler TM, Finegold M, Thompson TC, et al. Induction of human Cdc37 in prostate cancer correlates with the ability of targeted Cdc37 expression to promote prostatic hyperplasia. Oncogene. 2000;19:2186–93.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Lei W, Mullen N, McCarthy S, Brann C, Richard P, Cormier J, et al. Heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90) promotes opioid-induced anti-nociception by an ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) mechanism in mouse brain. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:10414–28.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Smith JR, Clarke PA, de Billy E, Workman P. Silencing the cochaperone CDC37 destabilizes kinase clients and sensitizes cancer cells to HSP90 inhibitors. Oncogene. 2009;28:157–69.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gray PJ, Stevenson MA, Calderwood SK. Targeting Cdc37 inhibits multiple signaling pathways and induces growth arrest in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11942–50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–33.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Miyata Y, Nishida E. CK2 controls multiple protein kinases by phosphorylating a kinase-targeting molecular chaperone, Cdc37. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:4065–74.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Bandhakavi S, McCann RO, Hanna DE, Glover CVC. A positive feedback loop between protein kinase CKII and Cdc37 promotes the activity of multiple protein kinases. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:2829–36.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Miyata Y, Yahara I. The 90-kDa heat shock protein, Hsp90, binds and protects casein kinase-II from self-aggregation and enhances its kinase activity. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:7042–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Miyata Y, Yahara I. Interaction between casein kinase II and the 90-kDa stress protein, Hsp90. Biochemistry-Us. 1995;34:8123–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Shao J, Hartson SD, Matts RL. Evidence that protein phosphatase 5 functions to negatively modulate the maturation of the Hsp90-dependent heme-regulated eIF2 alpha kinase. Biochemistry-Us. 2002;41:6770–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Chen YL, Hung MH, Chu PY, Chao TI, Tsai MH, Chen LJ, et al. Protein phosphatase 5 promotes hepatocarcinogenesis through interaction with AMP-activated protein kinase. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017;138:49–60.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Vaughan CK, Mollapour M, Smith JR, Truman A, Hu B, Good VM, et al. Hsp90-dependent activation of protein kinases is regulated by chaperone-targeted dephosphorylation of Cdc37. Mol Cell. 2008;31:886–95.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Cliff MJ, Harris R, Barford D, Ladbury JE, Williams MA. Conformational diversity in the TPR domain-mediated interaction of protein phosphatase 5 with Hsp90. Structure. 2006;14:415–26.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Polier S, Samant RS, Clarke PA, Workman P, Prodromou C, Pearl LH. ATP-competitive inhibitors block protein kinase recruitment to the Hsp90-Cdc37 system. Nat Chem Biol. 2013;9:307.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Zhang T, Li YY, Yu YK, Zou P, Jiang YQ, Sun DX. Characterization of celastrol to inhibit Hsp90 and Cdc37 interaction. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:35381–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Zhang T, Hamza A, Cao XH, Wang B, Yu SW, Zhan CG, et al. A novel Hsp90 inhibitor to disrupt Hsp90/Cdc37 complex against pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:162–70.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Li YY, Karagoz GE, Seo YH, Zhang T, Jiang YQ, Yu YK, et al. Sulforaphane inhibits pancreatic cancer through disrupting Hsp90-p50(Cdc37) complex and direct interactions with amino acids residues of Hsp90. J Nutr Biochem. 2012;23:1617–26.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Huang W, Ye M, Zhang LR, Wu QD, Zhang M, Xu JH, et al. FW-04-806 inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells by binding to N-terminus of Hsp90 and disrupting Hsp90-Cdc37 complex formation. Mol Cancer. 2014;13

  72. 72.

    Huang W, Wu QD, Zhang M, Kong YL, Cao PR, Zheng W, et al. Novel Hsp90 inhibitor FW-04-806 displays potent antitumor effects in HER2-positive breast cancer cells as a single agent or in combination with lapatinib. Cancer Lett. 2015;356:862–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Yu YK, Hamza A, Zhang T, Gu MC, Zou P, Newman B, et al. Withaferin A targets heat shock protein 90 in pancreatic cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;79:542–51.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Grover A, Shandilya A, Agrawal V, Pratik P, Bhasme D, Bisaria VS, et al. Hsp90/Cdc37 chaperone/co-chaperone complex, a novel junction anticancer target elucidated by the mode of action of herbal drug Withaferin A. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12

  75. 75.

    Gu MC, Yu YK, Gunaherath GMKB, Gunatilaka AAL, Li DP, Sun DX. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) of withanolides to inhibit Hsp90 for its activity in pancreatic cancer cells. Invest New Drug. 2014;32:68–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Li DR, Li C, Li L, Chen S, Wang L, Li Q, et al. Natural product Kongensin A is a non-canonical HSP90 inhibitor that blocks RIP3-dependent necroptosis. Cell Chem Biol. 2016;23:257–66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Jacobsen AV, Silke J. The importance of being chaperoned: HSP90 and necroptosis. Cell Chem Biol. 2016;23:205–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Li T, Chen X, Dai XY, Wei B, Weng QJ, Chen XP, et al. Novel Hsp90 inhibitor platycodin D disrupts Hsp90/Cdc37 complex and enhances the anticancer effect of mTOR inhibitor. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 2017;330:65–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Li T, Chen X, Chen XP, Ma DL, Leung CH, Lu JJ. Platycodin D potentiates proliferation inhibition and apoptosis induction upon AKT inhibition via feedback blockade in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Sci Rep-Uk. 2016;6:37997.

  80. 80.

    Wang L, Bao QC, Xu XL, Jiang F, Gu K, Jiang ZY, et al. Discovery and identification of Cdc37-derived peptides targeting the Hsp90-Cdc37 protein-protein interaction. RSC Adv. 2015;5:96138–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Rodina A, Wang T, Yan PR, Gomes ED, Dunphy MPS, Pillarsetty N, et al. The epichaperome is an integrated chaperome network that facilitates tumour survival. Nature. 2016;538:397.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Caldas-Lopes E, Cerchietti L, Ahn JH, Clement CC, Robles AI, Rodina A, et al. Hsp90 inhibitor PU-H71, a multimodal inhibitor of malignancy, induces complete responses in triple-negative breast cancer models. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:8368–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Heske CM, Mendoza A, Edessa LD, Baumgart JT, Lee SM, Trepel J, et al. STA-8666, a novel HSP90 inhibitor/SN-38 drug conjugate, causes complete tumor regression in preclinical mouse models of pediatric sarcoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:65540–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Zhang YQ, Ng PKS, Kucherlapati M, Chen FJ, Liu YX, Tsang YH, et al. A pan-cancer proteogenomic atlas of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway alterations. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:820.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Martinelli E, Morgillo F, Troiani T, Ciardiello F. Cancer resistance to therapies against the EGFR-RAS-RAF pathway: the role of MEK. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;53:61–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Ibrahim SA, G adalla R, El-Ghonaimy EA, Samir O, Mohamed HT, Hassan H, et al. Syndecan-1 is a novel molecular marker for triple negative inflammatory breast cancer and modulates the cancer stem cell phenotype via the IL-6/STAT3, notch and EGFR signaling pathways. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:57.

  87. 87.

    Li DR, Xu T, Cao Y, Wang HY, Li L, Chen S, et al. A cytosolic heat shock protein 90 and cochaperone CDC37 complex is required for RIP3 activation during necroptosis. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:5017–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Yang CK, He SD. Heat shock protein 90 regulates necroptosis by modulating multiple signaling effectors. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:2126.

  89. 89.

    Foley C, Mitsiades N. Moving beyond the androgen receptor (AR): targeting AR-interacting proteins to treat prostate cancer. Horm Cancer-Us. 2016;7:84–103.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Xin Y, Huang M, Guo WW, Huang Q, Zhang LZ, Jiang G. Nano-based delivery of RNAi in cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:134.

  91. 91.

    Martins LR, Lucio P, Melao A, Antunes I, Cardoso BA, Stansfield R, et al. Activity of the clinical-stage CK2-specific inhibitor CX-4945 against chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2014;28:179–82.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Wang L, Li L, Fu WT, Jiang ZY, You QD, Xu XL. Optimization and bioevaluation of Cdc37-derived peptides: an insight into Hsp90-Cdc37 protein-protein interaction modulators. Bioorgan Med Chem. 2017;25:233–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Zhao RL, Chen MJ, Jiang ZQ, Zhao FM, Xi BL, Zhang X, et al. Platycodin-D induced autophagy in non-small cell lung cancer cells via PI3K/Akt/mTOR and MAPK signaling pathways. J Cancer. 2015;6:623–31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was funded by grants from Science and Technology Development Fund, Macao S.A.R (FDCT) (024/2016/A1), Research Fund of University of Macau (MYRG2015-00091-ICMS-QRCM and MYRG2015-00101-ICMS-QRCM), and State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University (SKLNMKF201605).

Availability of data and materials

The material supporting the conclusion of this study has been included within the article.

Author information




TL drafted the manuscript. TL and JJL participated in the discussion. All authors revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Jian Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

The sup. Excel file for the comprehensive analysis of Hsp90-Cdc37’s client proteins. Comprehensive Analysis of Hsp90-Cdc37’s client proteins by using FunRich tool. (XLSX 313 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, T., Jiang, H., Tong, Y. et al. Targeting the Hsp90-Cdc37-client protein interaction to disrupt Hsp90 chaperone machinery. J Hematol Oncol 11, 59 (2018).

Download citation


  • Hsp90 chaperone machinery
  • Cdc37
  • Kinase client
  • Protein interaction