- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Zanubrutinib monotherapy in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a pooled analysis of two clinical trials
Journal of Hematology & Oncology volume 14, Article number: 167 (2021)
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mature B-cell neoplasm with a high initial response rate followed almost invariably by relapse. Here we report the pooled data from 2 studies, BGB-3111-AU-003 and BGB-3111-206, to explore the efficacy of zanubrutinib monotherapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL. A total of 112 patients were included. Median follow-up durations were 24.7 and 24.9 months for BGB-3111-AU-003 and BGB-3111-206, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were 84.8% and 62.5%, and median duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 24.9, 25.8 and 38.2 months, respectively. After weighting, the PFS (median: NE vs. 21.1 months, P = 0.235) and OS (median: NE vs. 38.2 months, P = 0.057) were similar but numerically better in the second-line than later-line group. Zanubrutinib was well-tolerated with treatment discontinuation and dose reduction for adverse events in 12.5% and 2.7% of patients, respectively. Hypertension, major hemorrhage and atrial fibrillation/flutter rates were 11.6%, 5.4% and 1.8%, respectively. Zanubrutinib is efficacious in R/R MCL, with a favorable safety profile.
To the editor,
MCL is a rare, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma with highly heterogeneous clinical presentation and aggressiveness [1,2,3]. Before the use of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, therapeutic options for patients with R/R MCL were limited, and their outcomes were generally poor [4,5,6]. Zanubrutinib is a next-generation, highly specific and potent BTK inhibitor [3, 7].Based on two phase I/II studies (BGB-3111-206 and BGB-3111-AU-003) [8, 9], Zanubrutinib was approved in 2019 by the US Food & Drug Administration for the treatment of adult patients with MCL who have received at least one prior therapy.
For this analysis, the patient-level data from BGB-3111-206 and BGB-3111-AU-003 were pooled to further characterize the efficacy profile of zanubrutinib monotherapy in R/R MCL.
A total of 112 patients were included, with 33 from BGB-3111-AU-003 and 79 from BGB-3111-206. The median duration of follow-up in BGB-3111-AU-003 and BGB-3111-206 was 24.7 and 24.9 months, respectively. Across the overall population, the median duration of follow-up was 24.9 months, and the duration of treatment was 20.4 months. Most of the patients had Stage III or IV disease (91%) and low to intermediate MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) risk scores (79%). There were 8% with bulky disease and 13% with blastoid variant (Table 1).
Before weighting, there were 41 patients in the second-line group and 71 patients in the later-line group. The second-line group had higher age, body mass index (BMI) and a higher percentage of patients with high MIPI risk scores, and lower percentages of patients with extra nodal disease and blastoid subtype compared with the later-line group. After weighting, all baseline covariates were balanced between the second- and later-line groups (Additional file 1: Table S1).The effective sample sizes were 27 in the second-line group and 59 in the later-line group, with median treatment durations of 22 and 18.8 months, respectively.
Prior treatment regimens included cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (hyper-CVAD) or hyper-CVAD-like regimens (9% and 19%), lenalidomide (0 and 14%), bortezomib (1% and 10%) and autologous stem cell transplantation (2% and 10%) in second- and later-line therapy groups, respectively. The percentage of patients who received prior bendamustine was low in both groups (4% in second-line and 5% in later-line; Additional file 1: Table S2).
In BGB-3111-AU-003, the ORR was 84.9%, and the CR rate was 24.2%; the median PFS was 16 months, and the median OS was 25.8 months. In BGB-3111-206, the ORR was 84.8%, and the CR rate was 78.5%; the median PFS was 25.8 months, and the median OS was not reached (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The difference in CR rates between the two trials might be due to the different imaging strategies (Additional file 1) and poorer patients’ condition in BGB-3111-AU-003 (Table 1). In the pooled population, the ORR and the CR rate were 84.8% (95% CI: 76.8–90.9%) and 62.5% (95% CI: 52.8–71.5%); the median duration of response(DOR), PFS and OS were 24.9 (95% CI: 19.5-not estimable [NE]), 25.8 (95% CI: 16.8-NE) and 38.2 (95% CI: 29.3-NE) months, respectively (Additional file 1: Figure S2).
After weighting, the ORR (89.4 vs. 85.5%, adjusted OR = 1.5; P = 0.538), DOR (median: NE vs. 23.1 months, adjusted HR = 0.743; P = 0.436), PFS (median: NE vs. 21.1 months, adjusted HR = 0.679; P = 0.235) and OS (median: NE vs. 38.2 months, adjusted HR = 0.449; P = 0.057)were similar but numerically better in the second-line than later-line group (Additional file 1: Figure S3).
In the original population, the rate of treatment discontinuation due to disease progression was 40.2% and due to AEs was 12.5%. Most patients (96.4%) experienced at least one AE, and 50.9% experienced at least one grade ≥ 3 AE. Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 33.9% of patients and AE leading to death occurred in 7.1% (congestive heart failure, n = 1; general disorders, n = 2; pneumonia, n = 2; road traffic accident, n = 1; hemorrhagic stroke, n = 1; ischemic stroke, n = 1). The most focused AE of special interest (AESI) were hypertension (11.6%), major hemorrhage (5.4%) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (1.8%). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 atrial fibrillation was 0.89% (Table 2). Detailed information of AEs was presented in Additional file 1: Table S3.
In conclusion, zanubrutinib is an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option for R/R MCL. Early treatment with zanubrutinib tends to have better survival profiles.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
AE of special interest
Body mass index
Bruton’s tyrosine kinase
Duration of response
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Epidermal growth factor receptor
Food & Drug Administration
Inverse propensity score weighting
Interleukin-inducible tyrosine kinase
Janus kinase 3
Mantle cell lymphoma
MCL International Prognostic Index
Overall response rate
Serious adverse events
Vose JM. Mantle cell lymphoma: 2015 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and clinical management. Am J Hematol. 2015;90:739–45.
Dreyling M, Geisler C, Hermine O, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Le Gouill S, Rule S, et al. Newly diagnosed and relapsed mantle cell lymphoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25 Suppl 3:iii83–92.
Li G, Liu X, Chen X. Simultaneous development of zanubrutinib in the USA and China. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:589–90.
Goy A, Bernstein SH, Kahl BS, Djulbegovic B, Robertson MJ, de Vos S, et al. Bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: updated time-to-event analyses of the multicenter phase 2 PINNACLE study. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:520–5.
Goy A, Sinha R, Williams ME, Kalayoglu Besisik S, Drach J, Ramchandren R, et al. Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3688–95.
Hess G, Herbrecht R, Romaguera J, Verhoef G, Crump M, Gisselbrecht C, et al. Phase III study to evaluate temsirolimus compared with investigator’s choice therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3822–9.
Guo Y, Liu Y, Hu N, Yu D, Zhou C, Shi G, et al. Discovery of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111), a Novel, Potent, and Selective Covalent Inhibitor of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase. J Med Chem. 2019;62:7923–40.
Tam CS, Trotman J, Opat S, Burger JA, Cull G, Gottlieb D, et al. Phase 1 study of the selective BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib in B-cell malignancies and safety and efficacy evaluation in CLL. Blood. 2019;134:851–9.
Song Y, Zhou K, Zou D, Zhou J, Hu J, Yang H, et al. Treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma with Zanubrutinib, a selective inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:4216–24.
We would like to thank all of the investigators, the coordinators at each of the clinical sites, and especially the patients who participated in this trial, as well as their families.
This study was sponsored by BeiGene.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
. Supplementary methods. Table S1. Baseline covariates before and after weighting. Table S2. Prior medication uses after weighting. Table S3. Treatment emergent AEs (any grade, grade 3 or higher). Figure S1. Outcomes of patients with R/R MCL treated with zanubrutinib in the BGB-3111-AU-003 and BGB-3111-206 trial. (A) DOR in the BGB-3111-AU-003. (B) PFSin the BGB-3111-AU-003. (C) OS in the BGB-3111-AU-003. (D) DOR in the BGB-3111-206. (E) PFS in the BGB-3111-206. (F) OS in the BGB-3111-206. Figure S2. Outcomes of patients with R/R MCL treated with zanubrutinib. (A) DOR. (B) PFS. (C) OS. Figure S3. Outcomes of patients with R/R MCL treated with zanubrutinibas second- versus later-line therapy. (A) DOR before weighting. (B) PFS before weighting. (C) OS before weighting. (D) DOR after weighting. (E) PFS after weighting. (F) OS after weighting.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, K., Zou, D., Zhou, J. et al. Zanubrutinib monotherapy in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a pooled analysis of two clinical trials. J Hematol Oncol 14, 167 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01174-3
- Complete response rate
- Mantle cell lymphoma
- Progression-free survival
- Second-line therapy