- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Multi-dimensional fragmentomic assay for ultrasensitive early detection of colorectal advanced adenoma and adenocarcinoma
Journal of Hematology & Oncology volume 14, Article number: 175 (2021)
Previous studies on liquid biopsy-based early detection of advanced colorectal adenoma (advCRA) or adenocarcinoma (CRC) were limited by low sensitivity. We performed a prospective study to establish an integrated model using fragmentomic profiles of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for accurately and cost-effectively detecting early-stage CRC and advCRA. The training cohort enrolled 310 participants, including 149 early-stage CRC patients, 46 advCRA patients and 115 healthy controls. Plasma cfDNA samples were prepared for whole-genome sequencing. An ensemble stacked model differentiating healthy controls from advCRA/early-stage CRC patients was trained using five machine learning models and five cfDNA fragmentomic features based on the training cohort. The model was subsequently validated using an independent test cohort (N = 311; including 149 early-stage CRC, 46 advCRA and 116 healthy controls). Our model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.988 for differentiating advCRA/early-stage CRC patients from healthy individuals in an independent test cohort. The model performed even better for identifying early-stage CRC (AUC 0.990) compared to advCRA (AUC 0.982). At 94.8% specificity, the sensitivities for detecting advCRA and early-stage CRC reached 95.7% and 98.0% (0: 94.1%; I: 98.5%), respectively. Promisingly, the detection sensitivity has reached 100% and 97.6% in early-stage CRC patients with negative fecal occult or CEA blood test results, respectively. Finally, our model maintained promising performances (AUC: 0.982, 94.4% sensitivity at 94.8% specificity) even when sequencing depth was down-sampled to 1X. Our integrated predictive model demonstrated an unprecedented detection sensitivity for advCRA and early-stage CRC, shedding light on more accurate noninvasive CRC screening in clinical practice.
To the editor
Recently, researchers have focused on utilizing plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA), including cfDNA fragmentomic profiles, to develop noninvasive approaches for detecting solid malignancies such as colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. But the limited sensitivities of these current detection methods, by the use of either single molecular feature or single algorithm, reduce their potential utilization in clinical practice, while ensembled stacked machine learning approach can improve robustness and accuracy [7, 8]. Herein, we constructed a multi-dimensional ensembled stacked machine learning approach, employing five different base models on five optimized fragmentation features, to provide an ultrasensitive and cost-effective model for detecting early-stage CRC and advanced adenoma (advCRA).
In this study, 149 early-stage colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) patients, 46 advCRA patients and 115 healthy volunteers were recruited in the training cohort from a single center, which was used to train the machine learning models (Figs. 1, 2A). To eliminate the potential impact on the predictive power by the different coverages and maximize affordability, WGS data were down-sampled to 4X coverage, unless otherwise noted. The test cohort (N = 311), which consisted of 149 early-stage CRC, 46 advCRA patients and 116 healthy controls, was used to evaluate model performances. ROC curves were constructed using five individual features including Fragment Size Ratio (FSR), Fragment Size Distribution (FSD), EnD Motif (EDM), BreakPoint Motif (BPM) and Copy Number Variation (CNV), as well as the DELFI fragment size pattern  and the 4-bp end-motif pattern by Jiang et al. , to demonstrate the advantage of using a multi-dimensional ensembled stacked machine learning model approach, as well as adapting existing fragmentation features . Detailed methodology is described in supplementary methods section (Additional file 1).
The ensembled stacked model had a higher AUC (0.988) than base models using any individual feature (AUC range 0.881–0.981), validating the multi-dimensional ensembled stacked approach (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). A similar pattern was observed as the ensembled stacked model had the highest sensitivity for detecting advCRA/early-stage CRC (97.4%, 95% CI 94.1–99.2%) compared to all base models (sensitivity range 57.4–89.2%) at 94.8% specificity (95% CI 89.1–98.1%) (95% CI 89.1–98.1%) (Additional file 1: Fig. S1, Table S1). Additionally, our adaptation to the existing fragmentation features was justified by showing better performances than the original features: the adapted 6-bp EDM feature showed higher AUC (0.981, 95% CI 0.969–0.993) than the original 4-bp end-motif feature (0.969, 95% CI 0.953–0.985), while models using FSR or FSD both had higher AUC (0.881, 95% CI 0.843–0.919; 0.892, 95% CI 0.855–0.930) than the original DELFI fragment pattern (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).
The stacked model showed better AUC while differentiating early-stage CRC (0.990, 95% CI 0.981–0.998) than advCRA (0.983, 95% CI 0.968–0.999) (Fig. 2B). Similarly, the model showed excellent sensitivities for detecting both advCRA (95.7%, 95% CI 85.2–99.5%) and early-stage CRC (98.0%, 95% CI 94.2–99.6%) at the 94.8% specificity (95% CI 89.1–98.1%) (Fig. 2D). The advCRAs more closely resembled early-stage CRCs than healthy controls (Fig. 2C), which was further validated by two additional models (Additional file 1: Fig. S2A, S2B). The current gold standard colonoscopy can be used to histopathologically distinguish advCRA and early-stage CRC following our model’s predictions.
We then constructed an ensembled stacked model using the raw depth NGS data (4.7–24.04X, median 9.75X), still showing great performances an identical AUC of 0.988 (95% CI 0.979–0.997) (Additional file 1: Fig. S3, Table S2). A limit of detection analysis was performed by further down-sampling the 4X coverage WGS data to 3X, 2X, 1X and 0.5X. The down-sampled data was then used to evaluate the 4X model. The AUCs showed a gradual decrease during the down-sampling process (0.988, 0.987, 0.985, 0.982 and 0.977 for 4X, 3X, 2X, 1X and 0.5X data, respectively) (Additional file 1: Fig. S4A).
In summary, our multi-dimensional ensembled stacked model, which uses plasma cfDNA WGS data, showed great potential for accurate noninvasive colorectal cancer screening prior to the current gold standard colonoscopy in clinical practice by demonstrating an unparalleled high sensitivity in detecting early-stage CRC as well as advCRA. However, this study was limited by several factors, namely the relatively small cohort size. The small number of healthy controls within the test cohort can impact the model performance, likely resulting in an underestimation of sensitivity. A multicenter, large-scale prospective study is needed to validate the clinical value of our methods further.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Advanced colorectal adenoma
Area Under the Curve
Copy number variation
DNA EvaLuation of Fragments for early Interception
Fragment Size Ratio
Fragment Size Distribution
Cristiano S, Leal A, Phallen J, Fiksel J, Adleff V, Bruhm DC, Jensen SO, Medina JE, Hruban C, White JR, et al. Genome-wide cell-free DNA fragmentation in patients with cancer. Nature. 2019;570(7761):385–9.
Jiang P, Sun K, Peng W, Cheng SH, Ni M, Yeung PC, Heung MMS, Xie T, Shang H, Zhou Z, et al. Plasma DNA end-motif profiling as a fragmentomic marker in cancer, pregnancy, and transplantation. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(5):664–73.
Rasmussen SL, Krarup HB, Sunesen KG, Johansen MB, Stender MT, Pedersen IS, Madsen PH, Thorlacius-Ussing O. Hypermethylated DNA, a circulating biomarker for colorectal cancer detection. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0180809.
Luo H, Zhao Q, Wei W, Zheng L, Yi S, Li G, Wang W, Sheng H, Pu H, Mo H, et al. Circulating tumor DNA methylation profiles enable early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and screening for colorectal cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(524):7533.
Jin S, Zhu D, Shao F, Chen S, Guo Y, Li K, Wang Y, Ding R, Gao L, Ma W, et al. Efficient detection and post-surgical monitoring of colon cancer with a multi-marker DNA methylation liquid biopsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(5):985–9.
Wan N, Weinberg D, Liu TY, Niehaus K, Ariazi EA, Delubac D, Kannan A, White B, Bailey M, Bertin M, et al. Machine learning enables detection of early-stage colorectal cancer by whole-genome sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):832.
Zhang C, Ma Y. Ensemble machine learning: methods and applications. New York: Springer; 2012.
Kwon H, Park J, Lee Y. Stacking ensemble technique for classifying breast cancer. Healthc Inform Res. 2019;25(4):283–8.
We would like to thank the patients and family members who gave their consent on presenting the data in this study, as well as the investigators and research staff involved in this study.
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1932145 to Junjie Peng), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (18401933402 to Junjie Peng), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82002946 to Yaqi Li) and Shanghai Sailing Program (19YF1409500 to Yaqi Li).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All study protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (SCCIRB), and in accordance with international standards of good clinical practice. Written informed consents were provided by all patients.
Consent for publication
The content of this manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Wanxiangfu Tang, Hua Bao, Rui Liu, Shuyu Wu, Hairong Bao, Xue Wu and Yang Shao are employees of Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. The remaining authors have nothing to declare.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure S1. Evaluation of base model using individual features. Figure S2. Evaluation of models distinguishing advCRA from early-stage CRC or healthy controls. Figure S3. Evaluation of model constructed using raw coverage WGS data. Figure S4. Evaluation of a multi-dimensional model detecting advCRA/early-stage CRC. Figure S5. Evaluation of age and gender matched groups in the test cohort. Figure S6. Evaluation of model using 10-fold cross-validation score of the training cohort. Supplementary Tables. Table S1. Performances evaluation of base models using different features. Table S2. Evaluating performances of model constructed by raw depth data in the test dataset. Table S3. Participant demographics and baseline characteristics. Table S4. Clinical information of the colorectal advanced adenoma (advCRA) and Adenocarcinoma (CRC) patients.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, X., Chen, Y., Tang, W. et al. Multi-dimensional fragmentomic assay for ultrasensitive early detection of colorectal advanced adenoma and adenocarcinoma. J Hematol Oncol 14, 175 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01189-w