Skip to main content

Polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells impair the anti-tumor efficacy of GD2.CAR T-cells in patients with neuroblastoma

Abstract

The outcome of patients affected by high-risk or metastatic neuroblastoma (NB) remains grim, with ≥ 50% of the children experiencing relapse or progression of the disease despite multimodal, intensive treatment. In order to identify new strategies to improve the overall survival and the quality of life of these children, we recently developed and optimized a third-generation GD2-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) construct, which is currently under evaluation in our Institution in a phase I/II clinical trial (NCT03373097) enrolling patients with relapsed/refractory NB. We observed that our CAR T-cells are able to induce marked tumor reduction and even achieve complete remission with a higher efficiency than that of other CAR T-cells reported in previous studies. However, often responses are not sustained and relapses occur. Here, we demonstrate for the first time a mechanism of resistance to GD2.CAR T-cell treatment, showing how polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC) increase in the peripheral blood (PB) of NB patients after GD2.CAR T-cell treatment in case of relapse and loss of response. In vitro, isolated PMN-MDSC demonstrate to inhibit the anti-tumor cytotoxicity of different generations of GD2.CAR T-cells. Gene-expression profiling of GD2.CAR T-cells “conditioned” with PMN-MDSC shows downregulation of genes involved in cell activation, signal transduction, inflammation and cytokine/chemokine secretion. Analysis of NB gene-expression dataset confirms a correlation between expression of these genes and patient outcome. Moreover, in patients treated with GD2.CAR T-cells, the frequency of circulating PMN-MDSC inversely correlates with the levels of GD2.CAR T-cells, resulting more elevated in patients who did not respond or lost response to the treatment. The presence and the frequency of PMN-MDSC in PB of high-risk and metastatic NB represents a useful prognostic marker to predict the response to GD2.CAR T-cells and other adoptive immunotherapy. This study underlines the importance of further optimization of both CAR T-cells and clinical trial in order to target elements of the tumor microenvironment.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell technology has rapidly evolved during the past decade, offering unprecedented results and now commercially available CAR T-cells targeting CD19 are employed to treat patients with B-cell malignancies non-responding to conventional therapy [1]. On the contrary, a big challenge remains the treatment of refractory solid tumors with CAR T-cells. Indeed, while pre-clinical studies showed encouraging results, only partial and transient responses have been obtained in clinical trials [2, 3]. These studies, however, uncovered mechanisms which may explain the limited success of CAR T-cell therapy, including lack of CAR T-cell persistence, quality of targeted antigen and the suppressive effect of the tumor microenvironment (TME) [2, 4]. Several strategies to overcome these mechanisms have been explored, including the targeting of regulatory/suppressive immune cells responsible of the TME-mediated inhibition [5,6,7,8]. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are immature myeloid cells that arise from bone-marrow (BM) myeloid progenitors. Within the MDSC population, two main subsets can be identified: monocytic (CD45+, Lin, HLA-DR−/low, CD33+, CD11b+, CD14+, CD66b and CD15) and polymorphonuclear (PMN) (CD45+, Lin, HLA-DR−/low, CD33+, CD11b+, CD14, CD66b+ and CD15+) cells [9]. The expansion of these myeloid cell subsets has been detected in several conditions characterized by a high level of inflammation, including cancer [10], autoimmune disorders [11, 12], sepsis and infectious diseases [13, 14]. MDSC are recruited by solid tumors and consist of immature cells contributing to the establishment of an immunosuppressive microenvironment [15].

MDSC presence has been documented in patients with different tumors and their potent immunosuppressive activity is now widely recognized [16]. Recently, in a mouse model, the expansion of MDSC has been reported to decrease CAR T-cell efficacy in metastatic liver tumors [17] and interventions to inhibit MDSC showed anti-tumor benefit in a murine sarcoma model [5].

In this study, we show that PMN-MDSC with inhibitory activity are highly enriched in peripheral blood (PB) of Neuroblastoma (NB) patients with refractory/relapsed disease after treatment of GD2.CAR-T cells (Fig. 1A, B, Additional file 1: Fig. S1). These patients, in whom multi-modal conventional treatments had failed, were enrolled at our Institution in a clinical trial exploring the safety/efficacy of a novel GD2.CAR T-cell product [18] (Additional file 6: Supplementary materials and methods). First, we investigated whether PMN-MDSC could be involved in GD2.CAR T-cell functional impairment. To this end, we showed that allogeneic PMN-MDSC, obtained from hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation-donors undergoing mobilization with G-CSF [9], display a marked inhibitory effect on several second- and third-generation GD2.CAR T-cells (Fig. 1C, D, Additional file 2: Fig. S2, Additional file 3: Fig. S3).

Fig. 1
figure1

Presence of PMN-MDSC in PB of NB patients and their effect on GD2.CAR T-cells. A, B Mononuclear cells isolated from the PB of NB patients were analyzed by flow-cytometry for the expression of specific markers allowing the identification of PMN-MDSC subsets. A Percentages of PMN-MDSC on CD45+cells (CD66b+CD14cells) in healthy donors (HD, n = 10) and in NB patients (NB pts, n = 9). B A representative gating strategy for PMN-MDSC identification by flow-cytometry is shown. C, D Second- and third-generation GD2.CAR T-cells were cultured either in the absence (w/o, blue bars) or in the presence (cond, red bars) of PMN-MDSC collected from stem cell donors given G-CSF and undergoing to leukapheresis. After 48h, GD2.CAR T-cells and non-transduced (NT) cells (used as control) were collected, purified and co-cultured at the effector:target ratio 1:1 with the SH-SY5Y-eGFP+ NB cell line. Percentages of SH-SY5Y-eGFP+ NB residual live cells at day 5 of co-culture with (C) second- (n = 10) and D third- (n = 10) generation GD2.CAR T-cells are reported. Patient derived GD2.CAR T-cells expressing CD28.4-1BBζ (the same used in our clinical trial) were cultured in the presence of PB-derived (n = 8) or BM-derived (n = 3) PMN-MDSC or PB-derived neutrophils (n = 3) collected from NB patients. After 48h, GD2.CAR T-cells were collected, purified from PMN-MDSC/neutrophils as described in supplementary data (Additional file 6), and co-cultured at an Effector:Target (E/T) ratio 1:1 with SH-SY5Y-eGFP+ NB cell line for 3 days. Percentages of SH-SY5Y-eGFP+ NB residual live cells were analyzed. E One representative co-culture experiment of GD2.CAR T-cells and PMN-MDSC is shown. F Percentages of residual live NB tumor cells in different culture conditions is reported. G Correlation between PMN-MDSC and GD2.CAR T-cells in CD45+ cells in NB patients (n = 55, different time point after GD2.CAR T-cell infusion), r2 = 0.07 and p value is indicated. Mononuclear cells present in the PB of NB patients were analyzed by flow-cytometry. Graphs represent percentages of PMN-MDSC and the corresponding absolute number/µl of GD2.CAR T-cells in NB patients. H Graphs represent GD2.CAR T-cells/µl (blue squares) and the percentages of PMN-MDSC (red dots) in CD45+ cells in responder (n = 5) and non-responder (n = 6) patients (multiple comparison with mixed-effect analysis). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005. Where not indicated, data were not statistically significant. A Mann–Whitney and C, D, F Wilcoxon Student’s t test. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)

To corroborate our data, we analyzed the inhibitory activity of PMN-MDSC that were collected from PB of GD2.CAR T-cell-treated-NB-patients. Our results confirmed the strong inhibitory capability of these cells on third-generation GD2.CAR T-cells in vitro, while neither autologous PB neutrophils nor BM low-density neutrophils, inhibit GD2.CAR T-cell cytotoxicity (Fig. 1E, F, Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

PMN-MDSC could be detected after GD2.CAR T-cell treatment and, importantly, their frequency in PB inversely correlated with that of GD2.CAR T-cells (Fig. 1G). Although, the number of patients analyzed in the present study is limited, we could observe that in patients with an early expansion of GD2.CAR T-cells a very low percentage of PMN-MDSC was observed. Of note, these patients (Responder) were characterized by a good response to therapy, reflecting a potent GD2.CAR T-cell activation. In non-responder patients, as well as in patients that lost response, high percentages of PMN-MDSC were associated with a lack of substantial expansion of GD2.CAR T-cells (Fig. 1H, Additional file 4: Fig. S4).

To better define the molecular mechanisms of the inhibitory effect, we performed a gene-expression profiling on PMN-MDSC-conditioned GD2.CAR T-cells. We observed modulation of numerous genes (p ≤ 0.01) involved in inflammation, cell activation, signal transduction and extra-cellular communication (Fig. 2A–C, Additional file 5: Fig. S5A), as well as cytokine/chemokine secretion (Fig. 2D). Three genes were found to be significantly upregulated in all conditioned T-cells: S100A8, S100A9 and TNFAIP6. These genes are involved in the immune response, leukocyte activation, inhibitory pathways induced by cell surface receptors, extracellular communications and others.

Fig. 2
figure2

PMN-MDSC induce modulation of the gene-expression profile and inhibit cytokine secretion of GD2.CAR T-cells. AC NT and GD2.CAR T-cells were cultured for 48h either in the absence or in the presence (cond.) of PMN-MDSC (NT n = 3; GD2.CAR T-cells n = 3). A Gene expression level (Rq) represented as mean plot with the 95% of confidence interval for the total gene analyzed in NT and GD2.CAR T-cells conditioned or not with PMN-MDSC. B Heat-maps representing the unsupervised hierarchical clustering of samples analyzed for inflammation, kinome and signal transduction gene-expression profile. Columns represent samples (NT and GD2.CAR T-cells), rows represent genes. C Volcano plots show inflammation, kinome and signal transduction gene expression data. The red or green dots indicate genes-of-interest that display highly positive or negative fold-change (x axis) and high statistical significance (− log10 of p value, y axis). The gene name related to a red and green dot is reported in the table (right panel). D Levels (pg/ml) of the indicated cytokines/chemokines in the supernatant of NT (n = 6) and GD2.CAR T-cells (n = 12) conditioned (red) or not (blue) with PMN-MDSC are shown. E Kaplan–Meier curves estimate of overall survival of HR-NB patients according to the level of S100A8 or S100A9 or TNFAIP6 gene expression. Red (low) and blue (high) lines indicate the level of gene expression using median cut-off modus. Dataset used for the analysis is indicated. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005

S100A8 and S100A9, belonging to the S100 family of proteins containing two canonical EF-hand calcium binding motifs, are involved in the calcium dependent control of cell differentiation, cell cycle progression and growth. Several studies underlined how these two proteins are up-regulated in many cancer patients and demonstrated their role in tumor promotion and progression by inducing MDSC [19] or generating the protein calprotectin, which has been shown to induce T-cell apoptosis and exhaustion [20,21,22].

The TNFAIP6 is a secretory protein that contains a hyaluronan-binding domain extremely important for T-cell migration within the extracellular matrix. Furthermore, TNFAIP6, like the other family members of TNFAIP, is involved in immune reactions, inflammatory responses, signal transduction, apoptosis, differentiation, material transport and other biological functions. They play important roles in multiple diseases and in the immune and inflammatory processes of cancer, including their overexpression in T-cells [23].

Interestingly, analysis on the up- and down-regulated genes showed upregulation of Th2 cytokines, activation of senescence pathways and sensitivity to TNF signaling, as well as down-regulation of genes involved in pathways controlling the intracellular signaling, metabolic process and inflammasome in conditioned GD2.CAR T-cells as compared to un-conditioned GD2.CAR T-cells (Additional file 5: Fig. S5B–D).

To further validate our data and verify the effect of the S100A8, S100A9 and TNFAIP6, we queried the public R2 NB gene-expression data set and found a strong correlation between upregulation of S100A8, S100A9 and poor clinical outcome in high-risk (HR)-NB patients and a trend for the TNFAIP6 (Fig. 2E). Moreover, the correlation between upregulation of S100A8, S100A9 and poor patient outcome has been confirmed also on the full NB population (Additional file 5: Fig. S5E). As previously shown, PMN-MDSC are able to inhibit different immune effector cells, including NK [9], αβ- and γδ-T-cells [24]. Moreover, inflammatory mediators, such as IL8 and IL1β and IL13, drive their accumulation and contribute to their inhibitory activity. In addition, MDSC can induce macrophage polarization towards a M2 profile, inhibit NK cell-mediated anti-tumor activity and recruit regulatory T-cells [25]. Of note, the different immunophenotypic characteristics of MDSC and their suppressive mechanisms of MDSCs reflect their heterogeneous nature [25, 26]. Therefore, different approaches are required for targeting human MDSC. Several compounds, including ATRA (all-trans-retinoic acid) [27, 28], vitamin D [29] and paclitaxel [30], have been shown to be able to block the MDSC immunosuppressive activity by inducing their differentiation. Notably, chemotherapeutic agents (e.g. gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil) [31, 32] directly reduce the frequency of MDSC enhancing the anti-tumor immune activity.

Overall, our data demonstrate the need to further implement the design of both clinical trials and CAR constructs and highlights the prognostic relevance of PMN-MDSC, since these cells are able to suppress in general anti-tumor effector cells, and not only CAR T-cells. Therapeutic agents capable of targeting and neutralizing PMN-MDSC might help restoring an effective anti-tumor activity of effector cells and protect CAR T-cells from the detrimental action displayed by immunosuppressive cells.

In conclusion, PMN-MDSC may represent a novel target in tumor immunotherapy and an important biomarker predicting response to immunotherapy-based treatments, not necessarily limited to CAR T-cell-based approaches. Whether these cells may interfere with conventional chemotherapy is an issue to be investigated in future ad hoc designed studies.

Availability of data and materials

All data obtained during the current study are available from the corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

NB:

Neuroblastoma

GD2:

Disialoganglioside 2

CAR:

Chimeric antigen receptor

PMN-MDSC:

Polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells

PB:

Peripheral blood

HR:

High-risk

EFS:

Event-free survival

TME:

Tumor microenvironment

MDSC:

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells

PMA:

Phorbol 12-myristate 13 acetate

Iono:

Ionomycin

TNF:

Tumor Necrosis Factor

IFN:

Interferon

G-CSF:

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

NT:

Non-transduced

eGFP:

Enhanced green fluorescence protein

CXCL3:

C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 3

BM:

Bone Marrow

Tregs:

Regulatory T cells

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

DMEM:

Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium

scFv:

Single chain variable fragment

OPBG:

Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital

S100:

S100 calcium binding protein

TNFAIP6:

TNF Alpha Induced Protein 6

SEM:

Standard error mean

References

  1. 1.

    Park JH, Riviere I, Gonen M, Wang X, Senechal B, Curran KJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of CD19 CAR therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):449–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Louis CU, Savoldo B, Dotti G, Pule M, Yvon E, Myers GD, et al. Antitumor activity and long-term fate of chimeric antigen receptor-positive T cells in patients with neuroblastoma. Blood. 2011;118(23):6050–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Thistlethwaite FC, Gilham DE, Guest RD, Rothwell DG, Pillai M, Burt DJ, et al. The clinical efficacy of first-generation carcinoembryonic antigen (CEACAM5)-specific CAR T cells is limited by poor persistence and transient pre-conditioning-dependent respiratory toxicity. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017;66(11):1425–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Heczey A, Louis CU, Savoldo B, Dakhova O, Durett A, Grilley B, et al. CAR T cells administered in combination with lymphodepletion and PD-1 inhibition to patients with neuroblastoma. Mol Ther. 2017;25(9):2214–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Long AH, Highfill SL, Cui Y, Smith JP, Walker AJ, Ramakrishna S, et al. Reduction of MDSCs with all-trans retinoic acid improves CAR therapy efficacy for sarcomas. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4(10):869–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ruella M, Klichinsky M, Kenderian SS, Shestova O, Ziober A, Kraft DO, et al. Overcoming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of hodgkin lymphoma using chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(10):1154–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kloss CC, Lee J, Zhang A, Chen F, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, et al. Dominant-negative TGF-beta receptor enhances PSMA-targeted human CAR T cell proliferation and augments prostate cancer eradication. Mol Ther. 2018;26(7):1855–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Caruana I, Savoldo B, Hoyos V, Weber G, Liu H, Kim ES, et al. Heparanase promotes tumor infiltration and antitumor activity of CAR-redirected T lymphocytes. Nat Med. 2015;21(5):524–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tumino N, Besi F, Di Pace AL, Mariotti FR, Merli P, Li Pira G, et al. PMN-MDSC are a new target to rescue graft-versus-leukemia activity of NK cells in haplo-HSC transplantation. Leukemia. 2020;34(3):932–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kumar V, Patel S, Tcyganov E, Gabrilovich DI. The nature of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment. Trends Immunol. 2016;37(3):208–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Knier B, Hiltensperger M, Sie C, Aly L, Lepennetier G, Engleitner T, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells control B cell accumulation in the central nervous system during autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(12):1341–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zoller M, Zhao K, Kutlu N, Bauer N, Provaznik J, Hackert T, et al. Immunoregulatory effects of myeloid-derived suppressor cell exosomes in mouse model of autoimmune alopecia areata. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Veglia F, Perego M, Gabrilovich D. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells coming of age. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(2):108–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tumino N, Bilotta MT, Pinnetti C, Ammassari A, Antinori A, Turchi F, et al. Granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells increased in early phases of primary HIV infection depending on TRAIL plasma level. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74(5):575–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Marvel D, Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment: expect the unexpected. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(9):3356–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhang S, Ma X, Zhu C, Liu L, Wang G, Yuan X. The role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Burga RA, Thorn M, Point GR, Guha P, Nguyen CT, Licata LA, et al. Liver myeloid-derived suppressor cells expand in response to liver metastases in mice and inhibit the anti-tumor efficacy of anti-CEA CAR-T. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64(7):817–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Quintarelli C, Orlando D, Boffa I, Guercio M, Polito VA, Petretto A, et al. Choice of costimulatory domains and of cytokines determines CAR T-cell activity in neuroblastoma. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7(6):e1433518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sinha P, Okoro C, Foell D, Freeze HH, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Srikrishna G. Proinflammatory S100 proteins regulate the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Immunol. 2008;181(7):4666–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ghavami S, Eshragi M, Ande SR, Chazin WJ, Klonisch T, Halayko AJ, et al. S100A8/A9 induces autophagy and apoptosis via ROS-mediated cross-talk between mitochondria and lysosomes that involves BNIP3. Cell Res. 2010;20(3):314–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang S, Song R, Wang Z, Jing Z, Wang S, Ma J. S100A8/A9 in Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sandu I, Cerletti D, Claassen M, Oxenius A. Exhausted CD8(+) T cells exhibit low and strongly inhibited TCR signaling during chronic LCMV infection. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4454.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lan G, Yu X, Sun X, Li W, Zhao Y, Lan J, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the expression and prognosis for TNFAIPs in head and neck cancer. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15696.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sacchi A, Tumino N, Sabatini A, Cimini E, Casetti R, Bordoni V, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells specifically suppress IFN-gamma production and antitumor cytotoxic activity of Vdelta2 T cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tumino N, Di Pace AL, Besi F, Quatrini L, Vacca P, Moretta L. Interaction between MDSC and NK cells in solid and hematological malignancies: impact on HSCT. Front Immunol. 2021;12:638841.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Veglia F, Sanseviero E, Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the era of increasing myeloid cell diversity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(8):485–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ugel S, Delpozzo F, Desantis G, Papalini F, Simonato F, Sonda N, et al. Therapeutic targeting of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009;9(4):470–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mirza N, Fishman M, Fricke I, Dunn M, Neuger AM, Frost TJ, et al. All-trans-retinoic acid improves differentiation of myeloid cells and immune response in cancer patients. Can Res. 2006;66(18):9299–307.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Friedman AD. Transcriptional control of granulocyte and monocyte development. Oncogene. 2007;26(47):6816–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sevko A, Michels T, Vrohlings M, Umansky L, Beckhove P, Kato M, et al. Antitumor effect of paclitaxel is mediated by inhibition of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and chronic inflammation in the spontaneous melanoma model. J Immunol. 2013;190(5):2464–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Vincent J, Mignot G, Chalmin F, Ladoire S, Bruchard M, Chevriaux A, et al. 5-Fluorouracil selectively kills tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells resulting in enhanced T cell-dependent antitumor immunity. Can Res. 2010;70(8):3052–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Suzuki E, Kapoor V, Jassar AS, Kaiser LR, Albelda SM. Gemcitabine selectively eliminates splenic Gr-1+/CD11b+ myeloid suppressor cells in tumor-bearing animals and enhances antitumor immune activity. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(18):6713–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This study was supported by grants from: Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [Investigator Grant, ID 21724 (FL) and ID 19920 (LM); Special Program Metastatic disease: the key unmet need in oncology 5 per mille 2018, ID 21147 (FL and LM); Start-Up Grant, ID 17184 (IC)]; Ministero della Salute—Ricerca Corrente 2020 (IC, LM, PV); Ministero della Salute GR-2018–12365485 (IC), RF-2016-02364388 (FL), RCR-2019-23669115 (FL); Ministero dell’Istruzione, Università e Ricerca—MIUR, Project PRIN 2017, ID 2017WC8499 (FL); AIFA—Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, project 2016-02364631 (FL); “Elterninitiative leukämie- und tumorkranker Kinder Würzburg e.V.“ and „Aktion Regenbogen für leukämie-und tumorkranke Kinder Main-Tauber e.V.” (IC). FB is recipient of fellowships awarded by AIRC. LQ was supported by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 800924.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Designed experiments NT, PV, IC; Performed the experiments NT, GW, FB, LQ, LA; Analyzed the data NT, PV, IC; Interpreted the results NT, GW, PV, IC; Wrote the manuscript NT, GW, FDB, PV, IC; Provided samples from the patients FDB, VB; Followed patients enrolled in the study FDB; Performed the routine immunomonitoring of patients enrolled into the clinical trial MS; Performed the molecular data analysis PP; Critically revised the manuscript LQ, EM; Contributed to the clinical trial design FL, FDB, IC, CQ and BDA; Provided intellectual input and revised the manuscript CQ, BDA, FL, LM; Supervised the project FL and LM, PV, IC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Franco Locatelli or Lorenzo Moretta.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patients or legal guardians provided written informed consent and the whole research was conducted under institutional review board approved protocols, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (Additional file 6: Supplementary materials and methods).

Consent for publication

All the authors reviewed the manuscript and consented to its submission and further publication in Journal Hematology and Oncology.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Functional test to assess the PMN-MDSC inhibitory capability. (A-D) T-cells isolated from healthy donor PB or GD2.CAR T-cells were co-cultured either in the absence or in the presence of PMN-MDSC derived from PB of NB patient. The proliferation capability was assessed by flow-cytometry for T-cells (A) or GD2.CAR T-cells (C, n = 6) after 5 or 4 days, respectively. The number of cells for each division is indicated. (B and D) TNF-α and IFN-γ production by CD8+ and CD8 T-cells (B) or GD2.CAR T-cells (D, n = 6) upon over-night stimulation with PMA and Ionomycin.

Additional file 2: Fig. S2.

Schematic representation of the retroviral transduction. (A) Schematic representation of the CAR constructs. Second-generation CAR T-cell constructs encoding CD28 or OX40 or 4-1BB costimulatory molecules. Third-generation CAR T-cell constructs encoding CD28.OX40 or CD28.4-1BB costimulatory molecules. All transduced CAR T-cells were equipped with the signal endo-domain derived from the CD3ζ chain. (B) Retroviral vector codifying for an eGFP. Created with Biorender.

Additional file 3: Fig. S3.

Effect of PMN-MDSC on third-generation GD2.CAR T-cells. Third-generation GD2.CAR T-cells were cultured either in the absence (w/o PMN-MDSC) or in the presence (with PMN-MDSC, 1:1) of PMN-MDSC collected from stem cell donors given G-CSF for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and undergoing to leukapheresis. After 48 hours, GD2.CAR T-cells and non-transduced (NT) cells (used as control) were collected, purified and co-cultured at the effector:target ratio 5:1 with the SH-SY5Y-eGFP NB cell line. Percentages of SH-SY5Y-eGFP+ NB residual live cells at day 3 of co-culture third-generation GD2.CAR T-cells (n = 7).

Additional file 4: Fig. S4.

Schematic representation of how PMN-MDSC compromise the GD2.CAR T-cell based therapy. (A) CAR T-cell preparation and infusion. (B) Differentiation steps from common myeloid precursors (pink cells) towards neutrophils (blue cells). Tumor cells (brown cells) and the TME may induce neutrophil accumulation and differentiation towards PMN-MDSC (dark grey cells). (C-D) Upon GD2.CAR T-cell infusion, patients could either (C) respond to CAR treatment (Responders) or (D) could display accumulation of PMN-MDSC which inhibit GD2.CAR T-cell expansion/function, thus contributing to the lack of efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy (Non-Responders). Created with Biorender.

Additional file 5: Fig. S5.

Expression of informative genes in GD2.CAR T-cells upon interaction with PMN-MDSC. (A) Gene expression level (Rq) represented as mean plot with the 95% of confidence interval in NT and GD2.CAR T-cells conditioned or not with PMN-MDSC for the indicated gene arrays: inflammation (n = 607 genes), kinome (n = 828 genes) and signal transduction (n = 597 genes). (B) Gene analysis correlation between S100A8, S100A9 and TNFAIP6 transcripts and all genes analyzed with p ≤ 0.01. (C) Pathway enrichment analysis for S100A8, S100A9 and TNFAIP6 genes. Clusters of different pathways were visualized in different colors, with the size of rectangles adjusted to reflect their p-value. (D) Pathway enrichment analysis on the up- and down-regulated genes in CAR/CAR conditioned T-cells. (E) Overall survival of NB patients (low, medium and HR) and level of S100A8 or S100A9 or TNFAIP6 gene expression. Red (low) and blue (high) lines indicate the level of gene expression using median cut-off modus. Dataset used for the analysis is indicated.

Additional file 6.

Supplementary materials and methods.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tumino, N., Weber, G., Besi, F. et al. Polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells impair the anti-tumor efficacy of GD2.CAR T-cells in patients with neuroblastoma. J Hematol Oncol 14, 191 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01193-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Neuroblastoma
  • Polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells
  • GD2.CAR T-cells
  • Clinical response
  • T-cell functionality
  • Long-term response