Skip to main content

VEGF pathway inhibition potentiates PARP inhibitor efficacy in ovarian cancer independent of BRCA status


Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have transformed ovarian cancer (OC) treatment, primarily for tumours deficient in homologous recombination repair. Combining VEGF-signalling inhibitors with PARPi has enhanced clinical benefit in OC. To study drivers of efficacy when combining PARP inhibition and VEGF-signalling, a cohort of patient-derived ovarian cancer xenografts (OC-PDXs), representative of the molecular characteristics and drug sensitivity of patient tumours, were treated with the PARPi olaparib and the VEGFR inhibitor cediranib at clinically relevant doses. The combination showed broad anti-tumour activity, reducing growth of all OC-PDXs, regardless of the homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutational status, with greater additive combination benefit in tumours poorly sensitive to platinum and olaparib. In orthotopic models, the combined treatment reduced tumour dissemination in the peritoneal cavity and prolonged survival. Enhanced combination benefit was independent of tumour cell expression of receptor tyrosine kinases targeted by cediranib, and not associated with change in expression of genes associated with DNA repair machinery. However, the combination of cediranib with olaparib was effective in reducing tumour vasculature in all the OC-PDXs. Collectively our data suggest that olaparib and cediranib act through complementary mechanisms affecting tumour cells and tumour microenvironment, respectively. This detailed analysis of the combined effect of VEGF-signalling and PARP inhibitors in OC-PDXs suggest that despite broad activity, there is no dominant common mechanistic inter-dependency driving therapeutic benefit.

To the Editor,

Olaparib is a first-in-class poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) for treatment of recurrent platinum-responding ovarian cancer (OC) [1] with deleterious mutations in BRCA and other homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway components which sensitize tumors to PARPi [2]. To increase the clinical therapeutic activity of PARPi, combination potential with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition has been tested in multiple trials [2, 3]. This has resulted in olaparib plus bevacizumab being approved for maintenance treatment of OC in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive tumors [4]. Combining olaparib and cediranib, a small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor targeting VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3 and mast/stem cell growth factor receptor c-KIT [5], provided a survival benefit in patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive OC, including BRCA wild-type tumours [6]. Our preclinical study assessed the benefit of combining VEGF signalling and PARP inhibition across a broad panel of patient-derived ovarian cancer xenografts (OC-PDXs). Cediranib potentiated the antitumor activity of olaparib regardless of the tumour’s sensitivity to platinum and olaparib and BRCA1/2 mutational status.

A cohort of subcutaneous OC-PDXs representing diverse OC genotypes and phenotypes (Additional file 1: Figs. S1–S3) [7] were treated with olaparib [1] and cediranib [5], mirroring clinical exposure [8]. Cediranib enhanced olaparib antitumor activity in all OC-PDXs, regardless of tumour histotype, HRR mutational status, expression of cediranib-targeted RTKs, sensitivity to platinum or olaparib monotherapy. As shown in Fig. 1A, the combination therapy showed broader activity versus olaparib monotherapy (81% vs 50%; P < 0.0001; odds ratio of 3.9) across the OC-PDX panel, with greater antitumor benefit in tumours refractory to platinum and olaparib. Tumour control seen at 4 weeks (Fig. 1A) was maintained at 8 weeks (Additional file 1: Fig. S4) with no increased toxicity. Notably, the combination achieved a durable growth stabilization of the platinum/olaparib poorly responsive MNHOC182 and MNHOC18 tumours, which bear heterozygous mutations in BRCA2 (Fig. 1B and Additional file 1: Fig. S2). In BRCA-mutated and platinum/olaparib-sensitive OC-PDXs, the combination achieved rapid and prolonged tumour regression and this was evident also in tumours that no longer responded to olaparib at rechallenge (i.e. MNHOC513, MNHOC511, MNHOC508, Additional file 1: Fig. S6).

Fig. 1

Cediranib potentiates the antitumor activity of olaparib in OC-PDXs. A OC-PDXs (N = 10) were transplanted subcutaneously in nude mice and treatment started when tumors reached approximately 300 mg. Olaparib (OLA 100 mg/kg) and cediranib (CED 3 mg/kg), as single agents or in combination (OLA + CED), were given orally by gavage once a day (QD) 5 days on and 2 days off (Q1 × 5). The change in tumour volume (compared with the tumour volume at treatment start, baseline for each mouse) after 4 weeks of treatment is shown in the waterfall plots (each vertical bar = one tumour): vehicle N = 100, CED N = 86, OLA N = 90, OLA + CED N = 98. RECIST category was determined/ as follow: change of tumour volume between + 25% and -30% was considered stable disease (SD), while below -30% was considered regressive disease (RD). The difference in objective response rate (ORR = the sum of RD and SD) of the combination therapy and olaparib monotherapy (81% vs 50%, respectively) was statistically significant (P < 0.0001; Wald test for logistic regression model) with an odds ratio of 3.9 (95% CI 2.05–7.41). Colours associated to each OC-PDX reflect the HRR mutational status (specified in Additional file 1: Fig. S1): tumours carrying a biallelic inactivating mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes (MNHOC154, MNHOC500, MNHOC508, MNHOC511, MNHOC513) are bluish; tumours being HRR wild-type (MNHOC124) or carrying heterozygous mutations in some HRR genes (MNHOC18, MNHOC94/2-C, MNHOC143, MNHOC182) are reddish. Sensitivity to cisplatin (DDP; cis-diaminedichloroplatinum) is also indicated: platinum-sensitive (T/C < 10%) light grey; marginally platinum-sensitive (T/C 10–50%) dark grey, platinum-resistant (T/C > 50%) black. B-D Treatment effects on MNHOC182 and MNHOC18 as exemplificative cases. Treatment effects on tumour growth of MNHOC182 and MNHOC18 as exemplificative cases. B Tumor growth, graphs are median tumour volume (mm3) ± median absolute deviation (MAD, shaded area). Coloured bars at the bottom indicate the study dosing period. DDP response (tested in the same experiment) is reported in the insert at the side. MNHOC182: Vehicle N = 5, CED N = 4, OLA N = 4, OLA + CED N = 5; MNHOC18: Vehicle N = 6, CED N = 6, OLA N = 6, OLA + CED N = 6. Differences in tumour volume were analysed by ANOVA and Tukey’s post-test (or t test when only two groups were compared) the days of measurement. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. C Heatmap of mRNA expression in MNHOC182 (left panel) and MNHOC18 (right panel) treated for 4 weeks. Log2 normalized values of 3 independent tumors/mice are shown. D Quantitative analyses and representative images (magnification 200x) of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for microvessel density (number of CD31+ vessels per mm3) after 4 weeks of treatment. MNHOC182 (left panel) and MNHOC18 (right panel). Statistic by ANOVA and Tukey’s post-test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.001. (Detailed methods in Additional file 2)

Extensive analysis was performed to identify potential drivers of combination efficacy. Consistent with its mode of action [9], cediranib dosed alone and in combination with olaparib significantly reduced OC-PDX tumour-associated vasculature (Fig. 1D and Additional file 1: Figs. S5, S7). Previous studies have suggested that cediranib-induced hypoxia sensitizes tumour cells to PARPi by reducing HRR gene expression [10], and that cediranib inhibits BRCA expression through platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) inhibition, thus inducing a contextual tumour BRCAness [11]. Our analysis suggests that downregulation of HRR genes or modulation of PDGFRβ signalling is not a dominant effect underpinning the combination benefit. Specifically, under severe hypoxic conditions in vitro, we did not observe any consistent change in RAD51 expression across a panel of OC cell lines (Additional file 1: Fig. S8). Moreover, downregulation of BRCA or RAD51 in vitro was only achieved at ≥ 3 μM concentrations of cediranib (Additional file 1: Fig. S9A,B), far higher than the clinical exposure. In contrast to other studies BRCA or RAD51 modulation was not prevented by silencing of E2F4 (Additional file 1: Fig. S9B), the transcription factors suggested to regulate expression via PDGFRβ [11]. Consistent with this, HRR gene expression was not modulated in the OV2022 PDX by either short or long term dosing, despite increased combination benefit (Additional file 1: Fig. S10). Likewise in OC-PDXs, no common changes in the expression of a broad panel of genes (including HRR ones) by cediranib or the combination were found (Fig. 1C and Additional file 1: Figs. S5, S11), nor there was any association between RTK basal expression (Additional file 1: Fig. S3A) and sensitivity to treatments at the clinically relevant dose of cediranib (Figs. 1, 2). Indeed, cediranib addition to olaparib significantly impaired the growth of MNHOC182 tumors (Fig. 1B) which have low/null PDGFRB expression (Fig. 1C). Pharmacokinetic modeling of the cediranib exposure profile in patients showed that robust inhibition of PDGFR is not achieved at clinically relevant doses [12] and consistent with our findings, olaparib efficacy is also enhanced by bevacizumab [2], which does not inhibit PDGFR, further supporting the conclusion that targeting PDGFR signalling is not a driver of combination benefit.

Fig. 2

Cediranib combined with olaparib reduces tumor dissemination and prologs survival in orthotopic OC-PDXs. Drug effect in orthotopic OC-PDXs. Olaparib (100 mg/kg) and cediranib (3 mg/kg), monotherapy or combined, were given orally by gavage QD (Q1 × 5) until progression. Left panels: Survival (Kaplan Meier) curves of tumour bearing mice; the benefit calculated as increment of lifespan (ILS%) of disease bearing mice is indicated. Coloured bars at the bottom indicate the study dosing period. DDP response is reported in insert at the side. Right panels: Abdominal tumour burden (i.e. volume of ascites in the peritoneal cavity and organ dissemination) assessed after 4 weeks of treatment. Ascites and dissemination data are mean ± SD. “Random” indicates tumour burden at randomization (start of treatment). Statistic by Wilcoxon rank-sum test/log-rank test (left panels) or ANOVA and Tukey’s post-test (right panels). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005; ****P < 0.001; *****P < 0.0001. A MNHOC8 (wild-type for BRCA genes Additional file 1: Fig. S1B but lacking BRCA1 mRNA due to promoter methylation Additional file 1: Fig. S3): mice were randomized 7 days after intraperitoneal tumor transplant. Vehicle N = 9, CED N = 12, OLA N = 12, OLA + CED N = 6. B MNHOC506 (wild-type for HRR genes; Additional file 1: Fig. S1B): mice were randomized 9 days after intraperitoneal tumor transplant. Vehicle N = 7, CED N = 7, OLA N = 7, OLA + CED N = 8. Representative images of tumor dissemination in liver are reported. C MNHOC22 (carrying a homozygous pathogenic nonsense mutation in BRCA1, truncating the protein; Additional file 1: Fig. S1): mice were randomized 6 days after intraperitoneal tumor transplant. Vehicle N = 13, CED N = 9, OLA N = 13, OLA + CED N = 9. (Detailed methods in Additional file 2)

The benefit of the combination in controlling tumour progression was confirmed in three disease relevant orthotopic OC-PDXs (Fig. 2) that mimic human disease with dissemination occurring in the mouse peritoneal cavity [7]. Cediranib addition prolonged the lifespan of mice bearing the platinum/olaparib-responsive MNHOC8 (Fig. 2A) lacking BRCA1 expression (Additional file 1: Fig. S3) and most importantly the olaparib-resistant MNHOC506 and MNHOC22 (Fig. 2B, C). Analysis at 4 week of treatment, highlighted the need of both drugs controlling ascites formation and tumour dissemination (Fig. 2, right panels), resulting in survival increase. Tumour regrowth at therapy discontinuation (Additional file 1: Fig. S12) suggests that sustained treatment is required to maximise prolonged tumour control. Collectively these data suggest that PARPi and VEGFi target complementary mechanisms to reduce tumour and that continuous therapy may be clinically important to restrain tumour progression.

In summary, we show that the addition of cediranib enhances the antitumor efficacy of olaparib in both olaparib-sensitive and olaparib-resistant OCs. Pre-clinical activity was not associated with a mechanism priming response to cediranib or olaparib. Rather the agents appear to be complementary, with olaparib impacting DNA repair and cediranib modulating tumour vasculature, to increase response across the entire OC-PDXs panel. Our extensive experimental in vivo efficacy data reproduce clinical observations, while our comprehensive mechanistic analysis suggests the combination effect is largely driven by targeting independent mechanisms, rather than inducing specific changes that prime response to a partner drug.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and Additional Files. The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission of AstraZeneca.





KIT proto-oncogene, mast/stem cell growth factor receptor


Cis-diaminedichloroplatinum, cisplatin


Homologous recombination deficiency


Homologous recombination repair




Increment of lifespan


Ovarian cancer


Patient-derived ovarian cancer xenograft




Poly ADP-ribose polymerase


Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor


Platelet-derived growth factor receptor




quaque die, Once a day


Receptor tyrosine kinase


Vascular endothelial growth factor


Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor


  1. 1.

    Mirza MR, Coleman RL, González-Martín A, Moore KN, Colombo N, Ray-Coquard I, et al. The forefront of ovarian cancer therapy: update on PARP inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ray-Coquard I, Pautier P, Pignata S, Pérol D, González-Martín A, Berger R, et al. Olaparib plus bevacizumab as first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2416–28.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Banerjee SN, Lord CJ. First-line PARP inhibition in ovarian cancer—standard of care for all? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:136–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Arora S, Balasubramaniam S, Zhang H, Berman T, Narayan P, Suzman D, et al. FDA approval summary: olaparib monotherapy or in combination with bevacizumab for the maintenance treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Oncologist. 2021;26:e164–72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wedge SR, Kendrew J, Hennequin LF, Valentine PJ, Barry ST, Brave SR, et al. AZD2171: a highly potent, orally bioavailable, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4389–400.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Liu JF, Barry WT, Birrer M, Lee J-M, Buckanovich RJ, Fleming GF, et al. Overall survival and updated progression-free survival outcomes in a randomized phase II study of combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:551–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ricci F, Bizzaro F, Cesca M, Guffanti F, Ganzinelli M, Decio A, et al. Patient-derived ovarian tumor xenografts recapitulate human clinicopathology and genetic alterations. Cancer Res. 2014;74:6980–90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Al-Huniti N, Petersson K, Tang W, Masson E, Li J. Population exposure-safety analysis of cediranib for Phase I and II studies in patients with cancer. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84:726–37.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Decio A, Taraboletti G, Patton V, Alzani R, Perego P, Fruscio R, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor c promotes ovarian carcinoma progression through paracrine and autocrine mechanisms. Am J Pathol. 2014;184:1050–61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ivy SP, Liu JF, Lee J-M, Matulonis UA, Kohn EC. Cediranib, a pan-VEGFR inhibitor, and olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, in combination therapy for high grade serous ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2016;25:597–611.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kaplan AR, Gueble SE, Liu Y, Oeck S, Kim H, Yun Z, et al. Cediranib suppresses homology-directed DNA repair through down-regulation of BRCA1/2 and RAD51. Sci Transl Med. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Li J, Al-Huniti N, Henningsson A, Tang W, Masson E. Population pharmacokinetic and exposure simulation analysis for cediranib (AZD2171) in pooled Phase I/II studies in patients with cancer. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83:1723–33.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Michela Lupia and Alessandra Decio for technical assistance, Luca Porcu for statistical analysis support and acknowledge Mark O’Connor, Gemma Jones, Maria Udriste and David Cochrane for their useful discussions and technical input.


Partially supported by AIRC IG 23520 to RG, AIRC IG 19797 to GD, AIRC IG21320 to UC.

Author information




FB, STB, MRB, RG conceived and designed the study; FB, AA, SCW, ARM performed the in vivo studies; FB, MR sample preparations; MAT Fluidigm analysis; GD, FGuf promoter methylation PCR; LM, SA immunohistochemistry; AG in vitro studies; JU pharmacodynamic analysis on in vivo studies; FGua, PO analyzed RNAseq data; MMH designed and oversaw OV2022 studies; UC provided selected cell lines; EL input on DDR protein modulation studies; MRB, CG supervised the experimental work; IFN, STB, MRB, RG wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Rosa Bani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal studies were approved by the Mario Negri Institute Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and authorised by the Italian Ministry of Health, Directorate-General for Animal Health and Veterinary Medicines. Experimental procedures involving mice and their care were conducted in conformity with institutional guidelines (Mario Negri Institutional Regulations and Policies - Quality Management System Certificate UNI EN ISO 9001:2008 Reg, No. 6121), in compliance with national and international laws and policies regulating animal testing (Italian D. Lgs 26/2014; EEC Council Directive 2010/63/UE).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MAT, MMH, SA, AR, SCW, AG, JU, EL, STB are AstraZeneca employees and shareholders. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary Figure S1. Characteristics of the OC-PDXs used for drug efficacy testing. Supplementary Figure S2. Haploinsufficiency of the BRCA2 mutation in MNHOC182 and MNHOC18. Supplementary Figure S3. Transcriptional status of key genes in OC-PDXs and BRCA1 promoter methylation. Supplementary Figure S4. Antitumor activity of the olaparib and cediranib combination therapy at 8 weeks of treatment. Supplementary Figure S5. Cediranib reduced MNOC124 tumour associated vasculature but did not affect the expression of HRR genes. Supplementary Figure S6. Rapid and prolonged tumour response by the combination olaparib and cediranib in platinum-sensitive and olaparib-sensitive OC-PDXs. Supplementary Figure S7. Reduction of tumour associated vasculature by cediranib in the OC-PDXs cohort used for drug efficacy testing. Supplementary Figure S8. Hypoxia does not trigger the downregulation of HRR in ovarian cancer cell lines. Supplementary Figure S9. RAD51 downregulation is not related to PDGFRB pathway. Supplementary Figure S10. The combination olaparib and cediranib demonstrated greater efficacy than either monotherapy in OV2022 tumours: no therapy-induced changes in HRR genes could be detected. Supplementary Figure S11. No common changes in gene expression by cediranib treatment were identified in OC-PDXs that benefit from the combination therapy. Supplementary Figure S12. Survival advantage is lost upon treatment interruption. Supplementary Table S1. List of genes analysed by Fluidigm high-throughput gene expression analysis.

Additional file 2.


Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bizzaro, F., Fuso Nerini, I., Taylor, M.A. et al. VEGF pathway inhibition potentiates PARP inhibitor efficacy in ovarian cancer independent of BRCA status. J Hematol Oncol 14, 186 (2021).

Download citation


  • Ovarian cancer
  • Patient-derived xenograft
  • PARP inhibitor
  • VEGF pathway inhibitor
  • BRCA
  • Olaparib
  • Cediranib