Foretinib can overcome common on-target resistance mutations after capmatinib/tepotinib treatment in NSCLCs with MET exon 14 skipping mutation
Journal of Hematology & Oncology volume 15, Article number: 79 (2022)
Capmatinib and tepotinib are guideline-recommended front-line treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14). However, the emergence of acquired resistance to capmatinib/tepotinib is almost inevitable partially due to D1228X or Y1230X secondary mutations of the MET. In this study, we explored agents that are active against both D1228X and Y1230X MET to propose an ideal sequential treatment after capmatinib/tepotinib treatment failure in NSCLC patients with METex14.
The inhibitory effects of 300 drugs, including 33 MET-TKIs, were screened in Ba/F3 cells carrying METex14 plus MET D1228A/Y secondary mutations. The screen revealed four-candidate type II MET-TKIs (altiratinib, CEP-40783, foretinib and sitravatinib). Therefore, we performed further growth inhibitory assays using these four MET-TKIs plus cabozantinib and merestinib in Ba/F3 cells carrying MET D1228A/E/G/H/N/V/Y or Y1230C/D/H/N/S secondary mutations. We also performed analyses using Hs746t cell models carrying METex14 (with mutant allele amplification) with/without D1228X or Y1230X in vitro and in vivo to confirm the findings. Furthermore, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out to examine differences in binding between type II MET-TKIs.
All 6 type II MET-TKIs were active against Y1230X secondary mutations. However, among these 6 agents, only foretinib showed potent activity against D1228X secondary mutations of the MET in the Ba/F3 cell and Hs746t in vitro model and Hs746t in vivo model, and CEP-40783 and altiratinib demonstrated some activity. MD analysis suggested that the long tail of foretinib plays an important role in binding D1228X MET through interaction with a residue at the solvent front (G1163). Tertiary G1163X mutations, together with L1195F/I and F1200I/L, occurred as acquired resistance mechanisms to the second-line treatment foretinib in Ba/F3 cell models.
The type II MET-TKI foretinib may be an appropriate second-line treatment for NSCLCs carrying METex14 after campatinib/tepotinib treatment failure by secondary mutations at residue D1228 or Y1230.
Two type Ib MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), capmatinib and tepotinib, were recently approved for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients carrying MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14). These drugs yielded progression-free survival of 5.4–12.4 months in clinical trials [1, 2]; however, the emergence of acquired resistance is almost inevitable.
MET-TKIs are usually classified into two types based on their binding mode to MET . Type I MET-TKIs bind to the ATP binding pocket of the active state of the MET (DFG-in) by interacting with the Y1230 residue . Type I MET-TKIs are further subdivided into types Ia and Ib, according to their interaction with the G1163 residue (the solvent front residue). Crizotinib is a type Ia inhibitor, and capmatinib, tepotinib, and savolitinib are the type Ib inhibitors. Type Ib MET-TKIs are specific inhibitors of MET unlike type Ia TKI [4, 5]. Type II MET-TKIs are also ATP competitors; however, these inhibitors bind to the inactive state of the MET (DFG-out). Type II MET-TKIs include cabozantinib and merestinib, and these drugs have multi-kinase inhibitory activity.
Currently approved type Ib MET-TKIs, capmatinib and tepotinib, interact with the residue Y1230 residue; thus, it is reasonable that secondary mutations at Y1230 cause resistance to these drugs. In addition, through analyses of clinical specimens obtained from patients who acquired resistance to type I MET-TKIs, the emergence of secondary mutations at the D1228 position was also found to be frequent after capmatinib/tepotinib treatment failure [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
As a potential second-line treatment, type II MET-TKIs that bind to the inactive form of MET have been suggested in previous studies to overcome many of the secondary mutations that emerge after front-line capmatinib/tepotinib monotherapy [14,15,16,17]. Although a few case studies have supported this hypothesis [6, 15], others have reported that patients who acquire D1228X secondary mutations may show a poor response to type II MET-TKIs [6, 14, 15, 18,19,20,21,22,23]. In addition, we and other groups have reported that cancer cells with D1228X showed higher IC50 values for type II MET-TKIs than cancer cells with Y1230X through in vitro experiments [15, 16, 24]. In this study, therefore, we aimed to identify the most effective type II MET-TKIs against resistant mutations to capmatinib/tepotinib, namely D1228X and Y1230X, through in vitro screening of all currently available type II MET-TKIs.
Materials and methods
A total of 33 MET-TKIs and other receptor TKIs, multi-kinase inhibitors and cytotoxic inhibitors were evaluated in the present study. A SCADS inhibitor kit was provided by the Screening Committee of Anticancer Drugs supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas, Scientific Support Programs for Cancer Research, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. In addition, we purchased almost all commercially available MET-TKIs which are under clinical development or were developed clinically in the past. The features of TKIs evaluated in the present study are summarized in the Additional file 1: Table S1. These drugs were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich) and stored at − 80 °C until use.
The interleukin-3 (IL-3) dependent murine pro-B cell line (Ba/F3) and myelomonocytic, macrophage-like, BALB/c mouse leukemia cells (WEHI-3) were provided by the RIKEN Bio Resource Center (Tsukuba, Japan). WEHI-3 secretes IL-3 into the medium and was thus used as a source of IL-3 for Ba/F3. The human gastric cancer-derived Hs746t cell line carrying METex14 and MET amplification, was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Gp2-293 packaging cells were purchased from Takara (Kusatsu, Japan).
Ba/F3 cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 (Wako, Osaka, Japan) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO,) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (PS) (Wako, Osaka, Japan) at 37 °C in an incubator in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Gp2-293 cells and Hs746t cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS and 1% PS at 37 °C in an incubator in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% and 10% CO2, respectively.
Generation of Ba/F3 cells and Hs746 cells carrying METex14 plus secondary mutations
A Ba/F3 clone with METex14 and MET-TKI-resistant Ba/F3 clones (METex14 plus D1228A/E/G/H/N/Y or Y1230C/D/S/N/H) were established in our previous study . These MET-TKI-resistant clones were established by MET-TKI exposure after ENU mutagenesis.
Transfection was applied to Ba/F3 parental cells and Hs746t cells to generate in vitro models of METex14 plus one of the secondary mutations (D1228H/N/V/Y or Y1230H) as described previously . Briefly, pRetroX IRES-ZsGreen1 carrying METex14 was used as a template, and the retroviral vector constructs encoding METex14 plus point mutations (D1228H/N/V/Y and Y1230H) were generated by a Prime STAR mutagenesis basal kit (Takara). All mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing. The viral particles were generated by co-transfection of these retroviral vector and the pVSV-G vector (Clontech) into Gp2-293 cells and were added to Ba/F3 and Hs746t cells. Ba/F3 cells and Hs746t cells infected with the retrovirus were collected using green fluorescence protein (GFP)-based fluorescence-activated cell sorting by a BD FACS Aria cell sorter (special order research product; BD Biosciences).
Cell growth inhibition assay
A total of 3 × 103 cells were seeded per well of 96-well plates. After 24 h, MET-TKIs were added at indicated concentrations. After a 72-h incubation, 10 μl of Cell Counting Kit-8 solution (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) was added to the wells, and the plates were incubated for an additional 3 h. The absorbance at 450 nm was read using a multiplate reader (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland). The percentage of viable cells was evaluated and compared with that in DMSO-treated control samples. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration values (IC50) were determined by fitting a nonlinear regression curve to a variable slope model with normalized response in GraphPad Prism version 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
Generation of foretinib-resistant clones by ENU mutagenesis
MET-TKI-resistant clones were generated by ENU mutagenesis as described previously . Ba/F3 cells expressing MET mutations were exposed to 100 μg/ml ENU for 24 h. The cells were washed and cultured in RPMI containing 10% FBS for 24 h. Subsequently, 1 × 104 cells were plated in 96-well plates in the presence of foretinib at indicated concentrations. The medium containing individual MET-TKIs was replaced once weekly for three weeks. When cell growth was detected macroscopically, total RNA was isolated from the resistant clones using an RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Then, RNA was converted to cDNA using ReverTra Ace (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). The MET gene was sequenced from exon 15 to exon 21 using Genetic Analyzers 3130 or 3500XL (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA).
Ba/F3 and Hs746t cells were treated with MET-TKIs at the indicated concentrations for 3 h. The cells were then washed twice with PBS and resuspended in lysis buffer. Lysates were quantified using a BCA protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and proteins were electrophoresed and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Immunoblotting was performed with antibodies purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Additional file 1: Table S2). Immunoblots were scanned using an Amersham Imager 680 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL).
In vivo analysis
An in vivo study was performed at Kindai University in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kindai University. Five-week-old nude male mice were purchased from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan), and 1.0 × 106 Hs746t cells were implanted in the right flank of each mouse. When the average tumor volume (length x width x width × 0.5) reached 0.75 cm3, the mice were randomized to three groups and treated once daily with foretinib, cabozantinib, and vehicle via oral gavage. Foretinib and cabozantinib were first dissolved in DMSO and then diluted with ddH2O to a dose of 16.36 mg/kg and 12.3 mg/kg, respectively. The final concentration of DMSO was 2%. The mixture of ddH2O containing 2% DMSO was used as a vehicle. Tumor size and body weight were monitored every two days and twice weekly, respectively, until the average tumor volume reached 2.0 cm3. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue Sects. (4-μm thick) obtained from in vivo experiments were deparaffinized and heated in Antigen Retrieval Citrate Solution, pH 6 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The tissue sections were treated with Protein Block Serum-Free (Dako) and then incubated with a phospho-MET antibody (#3077) (Cell Signaling Technology) and then Histofine Simple Stain MAX PO(R) (Nichirei Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan). Peroxidase activity was visualized via the DAB reaction using a reagent from Dako. The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.
Molecular dynamics simulations
Using MolDesk Basic ver. 1.1.77 (IMSBIO, Tokyo, Japan), molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of MET-TKIs and the MET protein were performed. Co-crystal structures of wild type of MET kinase domain in complex with merestinib, foretinib, altiratinib (type II kinase inhibitors) or MET D1228V with foretinib were downloaded from The Protein Data Bank, respectively (PDB ID: 4eev, 6sd9, 5dg5 and 6sdc). The retrieved protein–ligand structures were processed by MolDesk Basic ver. 1.1.77 (IMSBIO, Tokyo, Japan) (1): addition of all hydrogens and deletion of all water molecules for protein. (2) Addition of all hydrogens and partial charge for ligand was performed using MOPAC7 AM1 BCC of MolDesk Basic. A docking pocket of each ligand for c-Met kinase domain was generated specifying the site where the MET inhibitor was originally bound. For foretinib and merestinib, the structurally determined ligands within 6sd9, 4eev were used. For cabozantinib, 3D structure file (ID: 25,102,847) was downloaded from PUBchem. Molecular docking simulation of foretinib, cabozantinib and merestinib with MET kinase domain (wild type or D1228V mutant) were carried out and docking score and RMSD were calculated using the sievgene of MolDesk Basic. Ligands (foretinib and merestinib) were used from co-crystal structure model within the above files. PyMOL (ver 2.5.2) was used to draw the 3D structure and to measure the distance between two points.
D1228X as the most frequent on-target mutation causing resistance to type I MET-TKIs in the clinical settings
PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) was used to review previous publications and summarize the on-target mechanisms of resistance to type I MET-TKIs in NSCLC patients carrying METex14 [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Secondary mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib were predominantly reported prior to 2020 apparently due to easier clinical access to crizotinib. A total of 32 secondary mutations of 5 residues were demonstrated in 17 patients (Fig. 1A and B). D1228 and Y1230 were the common sites for secondary mutations conferring resistance to type I MET-TKIs, as we have reported previously .
We also reviewed the case reports of MET-driven mainly NSCLC patients who progressed on type I MET-TKIs, acquired secondary mutations at D1228 or Y1230, and were then treated by type II MET-TKIs, such as cabozantinib, merestinib, and glesatinib [6, 14, 15, 18,19,20,21,22,23]. The results of rebiopsy after type II MET-TKI treatment failure suggested that the Y1230X, but not D1228X, mutation could be eliminated by these type II TKIs (Table 1). These results suggested that second-line TKIs, which are active against both Y1230X and D1228X, are essential for effective overcoming of acquired resistance to capmatinib or tepotinib.
Comprehensive screening to identify active drugs against D1228X or Y1230X secondary mutations
The D1228X mutations are potential refractory mutations against type II MET-TKIs that were used in our previous study . Therefore, we first used Ba/F3 cells with METex14 plus D1228A or D1228Y, which showed resistance to cabozantinib and merestinib in our previous study , to comprehensively screen the inhibitory effects of 300 anticancer drugs (100 nM), including 33 MET-TKIs and 48 other RTK inhibitors. As expected, all type I MET-TKIs were inactive against Ba/F3 cells with D1228A/Y mutations, while four type II MET-TKIs, namely altiratinib, CEP-40783, foretinib, and sitravatinib, inhibited growth by less than 50% compared to that in the DMSO-treated control. No other drugs showed MET-mutant cell-specific activity (Additional file 2: Fig. S1 and Additional file 1: Table S3).
We then expanded the cohort of Ba/F3 clones with secondary D1228X or Y1230X mutations to cover all clinically reported amino acid substitutions. Among them, Ba/F3 clone with D1228V was not obtained by ENU mutagenesis in our previous study ; therefore, we established a Ba/F3 clone with METex14 plus D1228V by gene transfection in this study. Prior to subsequent analysis, the IC50 values of MET-TKIs obtained based on the data of the cell growth inhibition assay were compared in ENU-derived Ba/F3 cells with secondary mutations and vector-transfected Ba/F3 cells with secondary mutations to ensure that the results were comparable (Additional file 2: Fig. S2A–C).
The detailed IC50 values in Ba/F3 cells with METex14 plus D1228X or Y1230X (D1228A/E/G/H/N/V/Y or Y1230C/D/H/N/S) are summarized in Fig. 2A. In addition to the above four type II MET-TKIs (altiratinib, CEP-40783, foretinib and sitravatinib), we included merestinib and cabozantinib because these two agents are currently being evaluated in phase II clinical trials (Additional file 1: Table S4). We confirmed that capmatinib and tepotinib were inactive against all tested Ba/F3 cells. On the other hand, all six type II MET-TKIs showed potent activity against Ba/F3 cells with METex14 plus Y1230X mutations (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). The inhibitory effects against cells with D1228X mutations were heterogeneous among type II MET-TKIs: foretinib and CEP-40783 were the most active. Through comparison of the IC50 values in cells with METex14 plus D1228X vs. those with METex14 alone, we observed that only foretinib had similar IC50 values in all Ba/F3 cells with secondary D1228X mutations (Fig. 2B). The effect of inhibition of MET phosphorylation was in accordance with the results of the growth inhibition assay (Fig. 2C). We also found that among the type II MET-TKIs, foretinib showed superior efficacy in terms of the sensitivity index, which accounted for both its IC50 values in Ba/F3 models and clinically achievable drug concentrations (Fig. 2D).
In vitro activity of foretinib and other type II MET-TKIs in an Hs746t model
We also employed the Hs746t cell line, which originally harbored METex14 and is sensitive to MET-TKIs. We introduced cDNA vectors with METex14 plus D1228X (H/N/V/Y) or Y1230H secondary mutations into Hs746t cells to generate in vitro models with a secondary mutation in a part of the MET protein (with exon 14 skipping). We selected these four variants based on their frequencies in clinical samples (D1228N/H, Fig. 1B), the presence of a determined 3D structure (D1228V) and the potential lower efficacy of type II MET-TKIs in our previous study (D1228Y) . Similar to the results in Ba/F3 models, foretinib was active against Hs746t cells with all D1228X or Y1230H secondary mutations tested (Fig. 3A and B and Additional file 2: Fig. S3). The IC50 values of cabozantinib and merestinib in Hs746t cells carrying the Y1230H secondary mutation were within a twofold increase compared with those in the parental cells. However, most of the IC50 values for cabozantinib and merestinib in Hs746t cells carrying D1228X secondary mutations were at least fivefold higher than those in the parental Hs746t cells. Western blot analysis revealed that foretinib, but not cabozantinib, inhibited the phosphorylation of MET, as well as the phosphorylation of AKT, in Hs746t cells with the D1228N secondary mutation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3B).
In vivo evaluation of the efficacy of foretinib versus cabozantinib
To confirm the in vitro findings, we established xenograft models using Hs746t cells with METex14 plus the secondary mutation D1228N. The D1228N mutation was selected because this amino acid substitution was frequently detected in the clinical setting (Fig. 1B). After randomization, we treated mice with vehicle (control), foretinib, or cabozantinib orally. The drug dosages were determined based on a phase II clinical trial (80 mg/day) for foretinib and on the dosing used in clinical practice (60 mg/day) for cabozantinib [25,26,27]. As a result, we found that cabozantinib significantly inhibited tumor growth compared to that in the control; however, the mean tumor shrinkage rates remained within 20% of one another (Fig. 3C and D). On the other hand, in the foretinib group, all mice showed a major partial response of up to 90% shrinkage. By immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis, we found that MET phosphorylation was almost completely diminished in tumors treated with foretinib; on the other hand, it remained weak in tumors treated with cabozantinib (Fig. 3E). There was no significant difference in body weight loss between the treatment arms (Fig. 3F).
MD analysis of drug binding in MET with D1228X mutations
To investigate potential reasons for the higher sensitivity of foretinib compared with cabozantinib and merestinib to cancer cells harboring secondary D1228X mutations, we performed MD simulation analysis. Based on a previously determined 3D crystal structure of foretinib bound to MET with D1228V , we compared distances between foretinib or cabozantinib/merestinib and V1228. The smallest distances between the quinoline or pyrazole group of merestinib, cabozantinib and foretinib and MET V1228 were 1.9, 3.9 and 5.9 Å, respectively (Fig. 4A). We computationally replaced the long tail of foretinib with a small methyl group (producing a structure that resembles cabozantinib; the structures of these drugs are shown in Additional file 2: Fig. S6), and the results of MD analysis showed that the smallest distance between MET V1228 and this structure obtained by foretinib modification was reduced (5.9–3.8 Å) (Fig. 4B). Although the smallest distances between D1228 (wild type) and these drugs are not available, this result suggests that steric blockade is one of the potential reasons for the lower efficacy of cabozantinib/merestinib compared with that of foretinib in tumors with D1228X secondary mutations.
Tertiary mutation at G1163, a residue at the solvent front, may cause resistance to foretinib
We also explored residues that may cause resistance to the second-line treatment foretinib after the acquisition of D1228N or Y1230H secondary mutation through ENU mutagenesis screening (Fig. 5A). We found that G1163X, L1195F/I, and F1200I/L (and other minor mutations) caused resistance to the second-line foretinib treatment models (Fig. 5B–D and Additional file 2: Fig. S7A, B) especially in the models with the secondary D1228N mutation; on the other hand, these mutations did not confer high level of resistance to foretinib in the models with the secondary Y1230H mutation.
In our previous study, we observed that F1200I/L and L1195F are frequent resistance mutations against type II MET-TKIs such as cabozantinib/merestinib. To examine whether the frequent emergence of G1163X mutations at the solvent front is specific for foretinib, we also performed ENU mutagenesis analysis in the context of exposure to the front-line treatment foretinib. As expected, G1163X was a common secondary mutation observed in this setting (Additional file 2: Figs. S4B and S5). As shown in Fig. 4, the bound drug was located near the residue G1163 in the case of foretinib but not cabozantinib or merestinib. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that a change in the amino acid at this position may structurally block the binding of foretinib but not cabozantinib/merestinib.
The currently approved MET-TKIs capmatinib and tepotinib bind MET in an active state (DFG in conformation) at the Y1230 position using π–π stacking interactions. In addition, when MET is in an active state, the residue D1228 makes up the ATP binding pocket by engaging in a salt bridge with K1110 . Therefore, it is reasonable that secondary mutations at these residues will cause acquired resistance to capmatinib and tepotinib. In this study, we explored adequate second-line MET-TKIs with high activity against secondary mutations that emerge after capmatinib or tepotinib treatment failure. We found that type II MET-TKIs show various activities against secondary D1228X mutations, although many of them were active against secondary Y1230X mutations. Similar to lorlatinib, which is active against a wide range of ALK secondary mutations [29, 30], second-line MET-TKIs are anticipated to overcome both D1228X and Y1230X mutations because of potential heterogeneity in secondary resistance mutations within individual patients [6, 31]. Through analyses in Ba/F3 cells, Hs746t cells, and in vivo models, we found that the drug foretinib can inhibit both D1228X and Y1230X secondary mutations.
As one of the reasons for the different efficacies against D1228X secondary mutations between foretinib and other type II MET-TKIs, in this study, we found that the distances between V1228 and foretinib were larger than the distance between V1228 and cabozantinib/merestinib (Fig. 4). In general, the 4-fluorophenylamine group of type II MET-TKIs enables binding of the drug to the deep extended hydrophobic pocket of the MET . In the DFG-out conformation, to which type II MET-TKIs bind, the activation loop region, where both D1228 and Y1230 are located, are assumed to be disordered . Indeed, the structure of the activation loop in the DFG-out conformation is often unresolved in deposited files of the wild-type MET structure (PDB ID: 4eev, 6sd9 and 3f82) from the Protein Data Bank, as shown in Additional file 2: Fig. S8A. However, Gavin et al. found that when a mutation occurs at D1228, the structure is fixed due to the formation of an alpha-helix in the activation loop, which reduces the size of the hydrophobic pocket, as shown in Additional file 2: Fig. S8B . We suggest that this fixed conformation can facilitate the reduced activities of cabozantinib and merestinib. On the other hand, we found that secondary or tertiary mutations of residue G1163 at the solvent front cause resistance to foretinib. This is similar to the situation with crizotinib; G1163X mutations have been reported to cause crizotinib resistance [6, 7]. In the case of TKI treatment for NSCLC patients with ALK fusion, it has been reported that the interaction of the pyrazolopiperidine tail of crizotinib with G1202 at the solvent surface area is important for the appropriate binding of crizotinib to ALK . In the docking model analysis, an interaction between the residue G1163 and the long tail of foretinib was observed. Therefore, the long tail of foretinib may also play an important role in binding to MET through interaction with the solvent surface area. The data of thorough MD analysis confirmed that the smallest distance between MET V1228 and modified foretinib, which lacks the long tail, was reduced (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that the long tail of foretinib provides stability in the binding of foretinib to MET at the solvent surface area and thus is less susceptible to the narrowing of the pocket by the formation of an alpha-helix.
The safety and tolerability of foretinib have been confirmed in two phase I trials (Additional file 1: Table S5) [33, 34]. However, the clinical development of foretinib has now been terminated due to the lower efficacy of this drug. We consider that the negative data from these phase II trials are partially due to inappropriate patient selection (Additional file 1: Table S6) [26, 27, 35,36,37]. Indeed, in a subgroup analysis of a phase II trial for papillary renal cell carcinoma, the objective response rate and disease control rate were 50% and 100%, respectively, for patients with the germline point mutations of MET . Considering the current circumstances, we propose (1) re-evaluation of foretinib in the second-line setting for NSCLC patients who acquired resistance to capmatinib or tepotinib by secondary mutations or (2) development of a novel type II MET-TKI with a long tail that interacts with the residue G1163 of the MET.
In this study, we explored adequate second-line MET-TKIs that show high activity against secondary mutations that emerge after treatment failure of two approved type Ib MET-TKIs, capmatinib and tepotinib. We showed that many type II MET-TKIs can overcome Y1230X mutations; however, our results suggest that cabozantinib and merestinib, which are currently under clinical development, may be insufficient to overcome resistance conferred by D1228X secondary mutations. On the other hand, foretinib showed potent activity against both D1228X and Y1230X secondary mutations.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional file.
Non-small-cell lung cancer
MET exon 14 skipping mutation
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
- MD simulation:
Molecular dynamics simulation
Wolf J, Seto T, Han J-Y, Reguart N, Garon EB, Groen HJM, Tan DSW, Hida T, de Jonge M, Orlov SV, et al. Capmatinib in MET exon 14–mutated or MET-amplified Non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:944–57.
Paik PK, Felip E, Veillon R, Sakai H, Cortot AB, Garassino MC, Mazieres J, Viteri S, Senellart H, Van Meerbeeck J, Raskin J, Reinmuth N, Conte P, Kowalski D, Cho BC, Patel JD, Horn L, Griesinger F, Han J-Y, Kim Y-C, Chang G-C, Tsai C-L, Yang JC-H, Chen Y-M, Smit EF, van der Wekken AJ, Kato T, Juraeva D, Stroh C, Bruns R, Straub J, Johne A, Scheele J, Heymach JV, Le X. Tepotinib in non–small-cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 skipping mutations. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(10):931–43. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2004407.
Cui JJ. Targeting receptor tyrosine kinase MET in cancer: small molecule inhibitors and clinical progress. J Med Chem. 2014;57:4427–53.
Baltschukat S, Schacher Engstler B, Huang A, Hao HX, Tam A, Wang HQ, Liang J, DiMare MT, Bhang HC, Wang Y, et al. Capmatinib (INC280) is active against models of non-small cell lung cancer and other cancer types with defined mechanisms of MET activation. Clin Cancer Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2814.
Bladt F, Faden B, Friese-Hamim M, Knuehl C, Wilm C, Fittschen C, Gradler U, Meyring M, Dorsch D, Jaehrling F, et al. EMD 1214063 and EMD 1204831 constitute a new class of potent and highly selective c-Met inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:2941–51.
Recondo G, Bahcall M, Spurr LF, Che J, Ricciuti B, Leonardi GC, Lo Y-C, Li YY, Lamberti G, Nguyen T, et al. Molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to MET Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with MET exon 14–mutant NSCLC. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:2615.
Zhang Y, Yin J, Peng F. Acquired resistance to crizotinib in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping. Lung Cancer. 2017;113:69–71.
Ou SI, Young L, Schrock AB, Johnson A, Klempner SJ, Zhu VW, Miller VA, Ali SM. Emergence of preexisting MET Y1230C mutation as a resistance mechanism to crizotinib in NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:137–40.
Rotow JK, Gui P, Wu W, Raymond VM, Lanman RB, Kaye FJ, Peled N, de la Cruz FF, Nadres B, Corcoran RB, et al. Co-occurring alterations in the RAS-MAPK pathway limit response to MET inhibitor treatment in MET exon 14 skipping mutation-positive lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;11:1242.
Dong HJ, Li P, Wu CL, Zhou XY, Lu HJ, Zhou T. Response and acquired resistance to crizotinib in Chinese patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring MET Exon 14 splicing alternations. Lung Cancer. 2016;102:118–21.
Jin W, Shan B, Liu H, Zhou S, Li W, Pan J, Lin L, Hu D, Pan Y. Acquired mechanism of crizotinib resistance in NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:e137–9.
Heist RS, Sequist LV, Borger D, Gainor JF, Arellano RS, Le LP, Dias-Santagata D, Clark JW, Engelman JA, Shaw AT, Iafrate AJ. Acquired resistance to crizotinib in NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:1242–5.
Pruis MA, Geurts-Giele WRR, von der Thüsen JH, Meijssen IC, Dinjens WNM, Aerts JGJV, Dingemans AMC, Lolkema MP, Paats MS, Dubbink HJ. Highly accurate DNA-based detection and treatment results of MET exon 14 skipping mutations in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2020;140:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.11.010.
Bahcall M, Sim T, Paweletz CP, Patel JD, Alden RS, Kuang Y, Sacher AG, Kim ND, Lydon CA, Awad MM, et al. Acquired METD1228V mutation and resistance to MET inhibition in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:1334–41.
Engstrom LD, Aranda R, Lee M, Tovar EA, Essenburg CJ, Madaj Z, Chiang H, Briere D, Hallin J, Lopez-Casas PP, Baños N, Menendez C, Hidalgo M, Tassell V, Chao R, Chudova DI, Lanman RB, Olson P, Bazhenova L, Patel SP, Graveel C, Nishino M, Shapiro GI, Peled N, Awad MM, Jänne PA, Christensen JG. Glesatinib exhibits antitumor activity in lung cancer models and patients harboring MET exon 14 mutations and overcomes mutation-mediated resistance to type I MET inhibitors in nonclinical models. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(21):6661–72. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1192.
Fujino T, Kobayashi Y, Suda K, Koga T, Nishino M, Ohara S, Chiba M, Shimoji M, Tomizawa K, Takemoto T, Mitsudomi T. Sensitivity and resistance of MET exon 14 mutations in lung cancer to eight MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors in vitro. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:1753–65.
Li A, Yang J-j, Zhang X-c, Zhang Z, Jian S, Lan-ying Gou Y, Bai QZ, Yang Z, Han-Zhang H, Zhong W-Z, Chuai S, Zhang Q, Xie Z, Gao H, Chen H, Wang Z, Wang Z, Yang X-n, Wang B-c, Gan B, Chen Z-h, Jiang B-y, Si-pei W, Liu S-y, Chong-rui X, Yi-long W. Acquired MET Y1248H and D1246N mutations mediate resistance to MET inhibitors in non–small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(16):4929–37. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3273.
Kang J, Chen HJ, Wang Z, Liu J, Li B, Zhang T, Yang Z, Wu YL, Yang JJ. Osimertinib and cabozantinib combinatorial therapy in an EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patient with multiple MET secondary-site mutations after resistance to crizotinib. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:e49-53.
Parsons BM, Meier DR, Richmond CS, Gurda GT, Lofgren KA, Burkard ME, Deming DA, Kenny PA. Acquisition of cabozantinib-sensitive MET D1228N mutation during progression on crizotinib in MET-amplified triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020;20:e433–8.
Piper-Vallillo AJ, Halbert BT, Rangachari D, Kobayashi SS, Costa DB. Acquired resistance to osimertinib plus savolitinib Is mediated by MET-D1228 and MET-Y1230 mutations in EGFR-mutated MET-amplified lung cancer. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2020;1(4):100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100071.
Riedel R, Heydt C, Scheel A, Tumbrink H, Brägelmann J, Fassunke J, Nogova L, Michels S, Scheffler M, Fischer R, Koleczko S, Weber J, Westphal T, Abdulla D, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Sos M, Büttner R, Wolf J. FP14.04 resistance to MET inhibition in MET driven NSCLC and response after switching from type I to type II MET inhibitors. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16(3):S228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2021.01.147.
Wang Y, Chen Z, Han X, Li J, Guo H, Shi J. Acquired MET D1228N mutations mediate crizotinib resistance in lung adenocarcinoma with ROS1 fusion: a case report. Oncologist. 2021;26:178–81.
Zhu VW, Zhang SS, Zhang J, Swensen J, Xiu J, Ou SI. Acquired tertiary MET resistance (MET D1228N and a novel LSM8-MET fusion) to selpercatinib and capmatinib in a patient with KIF5B-RET-positive NSCLC with secondary MET amplification as initial resistance to selpercatinib. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16:e51–4.
Yakes FM, Chen J, Tan J, Yamaguchi K, Shi Y, Yu P, Qian F, Chu F, Bentzien F, Cancilla B, et al. Cabozantinib (XL184), a novel MET and VEGFR2 inhibitor, simultaneously suppresses metastasis, angiogenesis, and tumor growth. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10:2298–308.
Nair AB, Jacob S. A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2016;7:27–31.
Choueiri TK, Vaishampayan U, Rosenberg JE, Logan TF, Harzstark AL, Bukowski RM, Rini BI, Srinivas S, Stein MN, Adams LM, et al. Phase II and biomarker study of the dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor foretinib in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;31:181–6.
Shah MA, Wainberg ZA, Catenacci DV, Hochster HS, Ford J, Kunz P, Lee FC, Kallender H, Cecchi F, Rabe DC, et al. Phase II study evaluating 2 dosing schedules of oral foretinib (GSK1363089), cMET/VEGFR2 inhibitor, in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e54014.
Collie GW, Koh CM, O’Neill DJ, Stubbs CJ, Khurana P, Eddershaw A, Snijder A, Mauritzson F, Barlind L, Dale IL, et al. Structural and molecular insight into resistance mechanisms of first generation cMET inhibitors. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2019;10:1322–7.
Gainor JF, Dardaei L, Yoda S, Friboulet L, Leshchiner I, Katayama R, Dagogo-Jack I, Gadgeel S, Schultz K, Singh M, et al. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:1118–33.
Solomon BJ, Besse B, Bauer TM, Felip E, Soo RA, Camidge DR, Chiari R, Bearz A, Lin C-C, Gadgeel SM, et al. Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1654–67.
Fujino T, Suda K, Mitsudomi T. Emerging MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2020;25:229–49.
Huang Q, Johnson TW, Bailey S, Brooun A, Bunker KD, Burke BJ, Collins MR, Cook AS, Cui JJ, Dack KN, et al. Design of potent and selective inhibitors to overcome clinical anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations resistant to crizotinib. J Med Chem. 2014;57:1170–87.
Eder JP, Shapiro GI, Appleman LJ, Zhu AX, Miles D, Keer H, Cancilla B, Chu F, Hitchcock-Bryan S, Sherman L, et al. A phase I study of foretinib, a multi-targeted inhibitor of c-Met and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:3507–16.
Shapiro GI, McCallum S, Adams LM, Sherman L, Weller S, Swann S, Keer H, Miles D, Muller T, Lorusso P. A Phase 1 dose-escalation study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral foretinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31:742–50.
Yau TCC, Lencioni R, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Chao Y, Yen CJ, Lausoontornsiri W, Chen PJ, Sanpajit T, Camp A, Cox DS, et al. A Phase I/II multicenter study of single-agent foretinib as first-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:2405–13.
Rayson D, Lupichuk S, Potvin K, Dent S, Shenkier T, Dhesy-Thind S, Ellard SL, Prady C, Salim M, Farmer P, et al. Canadian cancer trials group IND197: a phase II study of foretinib in patients with estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;157:109–16.
Seiwert T, Sarantopoulos J, Kallender H, McCallum S, Keer HN, Blumenschein G Jr. Phase II trial of single-agent foretinib (GSK1363089) in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31:417–24.
The authors thank Ms. Keiko Obata (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine), Ms. Tomoko Hashimoto (Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine), Mr. Nobuyuki Mizuguchi (Life Science Research Institute, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine) and Mr. Yoshihiro Mine (Center for Instrumental Analyses Central Research Facilities, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine) for the technical assistance provided during the study.
This paper was supported by Grants-in-Aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (grant 19K16813 and grant 21K15580 to Dr. Fujino, grant 20H03773 to Dr. Mitsudomi).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animals were maintained in compliance with institutional guidelines and standards approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kindai University (No. KDMS-29–006).
Consent for publication
Dr. Fujino has received research funding from Apollomics and Brighe Biotherapeutic and lecture fees from Novartis. Dr. Suda has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai and Taiho, has been on the advisory board of AstraZeneca, and has received research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim and Rain Therapeutics, outside of the submitted work. Dr. Koga has received research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside of the submitted work. Dr. Hamada has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca and Chugai outside of the submitted work. Dr. Chiba has received honorarium from Ethicon, Olympus, B-Braun, and Covidien outside of the submitted work. Dr. Soh has received honoraria from Johnson and Johnson, Intutive, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr. Mitsudomi has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, and Pfizer and research funding from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Chugai; in addition, he has been on the advisory board of Novartis and received lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dohme. Dr. Mitsudomi has also received research funding from Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho, and Ono Pharmaceutical, outside of the submitted work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Table S1. A list of tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in this study. Table S2. A list of antibodies used in this study. Table S3. Results of drug screening other than tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Table S4. Type II MET-TKIs evaluated in this study. Table S5. Clinical information of two phase I studies of foretinib. Table S6. Clinical information of five phase II studies of foretinib.
: Fig. S1. Drug screening against MET D1228A/Y using a drug library. Fig. S2. Summary of growth inhibitory curves of eight MET-TKIs for Ba/F3 cells with each MET mutation. Fig. S3. Evaluation of the effects of secondary mutations on sensitivity to MET-TKIs using the Hs746t cell line. Fig. S4. Analysis of the secondary resistance mutations against 1st line foretinib. Fig. S5. Growth inhibition curves for ENU-derived foretinib resistant Ba/F3 cells carrying MET secondary mutation. Fig. S6. Comparison of the structures of each type II MET-TKI. Fig. S7. Summary of growth inhibitory curves of three MET-TKIs for Ba/F3 cells with MET tertiary mutations. Fig. S8. Structure of MET in the DFG-in and DFG-out conformations.
About this article
Cite this article
Fujino, T., Suda, K., Koga, T. et al. Foretinib can overcome common on-target resistance mutations after capmatinib/tepotinib treatment in NSCLCs with MET exon 14 skipping mutation. J Hematol Oncol 15, 79 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01299-z