Skip to main content

Olverembatinib (HQP1351), a well-tolerated and effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with T315I-mutated chronic myeloid leukemia: results of an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 trial

A Correction to this article was published on 31 October 2022

This article has been updated



BCR-ABL1T315I mutations confer resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Olverembatinib is a new potent BCR-ABL1 TKI with preclinical activity against T315I-mutated CML. In phase 1/2 studies, we explored the safety and efficacy of olverembatinib in Chinese adults with TKI-resistant CML in the chronic phase (CML-CP) and accelerated phase (CML-AP).


In the phase 1 study, olverembatinib was orally administered once every other day in 28-day cycles at 11 dose cohorts ranging from 1 to 60 mg, and we evaluated the maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of olverembatinib. In the phase 2 studies, olverembatinib was administered at the RP2D of 40 mg orally on alternate days for 28-day cycles. The primary outcome measure is major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and major hematologic response by the end of Cycle 12 in CML-CP and CML-AP, respectively. Fine and Gray's hazard models were used to identify covariates associated with responses.


A total of 165 patients (> 80.0% of whom had received ≥ 2 TKIs) were enrolled in this study. Among 127 patients with CML-CP, the 3-year cumulative incidences of achieving MCyR, complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), MR4.0, and MR4.5 were 79.0, 69.0, 56.0, 44.0 and 39.0%, respectively. The highest response rates were observed in patients with a single T315I mutation. Among 38 patients with CML-AP, the 3-year cumulative incidences of achieving MCyR, CCyR, MMR, MR4.0, and MR4.5 were 47.4%, 47.4%, 44.7%, 39.3%, and 32.1%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, baseline BCR-ABL1 mutation status was significantly associated with cytogenetic and molecular responses. Common treatment-related adverse events included skin hyperpigmentation, hypertriglyceridemia, proteinuria, and severe thrombocytopenia.


Olverembatinib was well tolerated, with significant antileukemic activity in adults with TKI-resistant CML-CP and CML-AP, especially those with the T315I mutation.

Trial registration: The phase 1 trial is registered at CTR20220566, and the two single-arm, open-label phase 2 studies are registered at NCT03883087 (CML-CP) and NCT03883100 (CML-AP).


Introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) [1,2,3], but resistance to TKIs remains a challenge. The BCR-ABL1T315I “gatekeeper” (the most common kinase domain) mutation confers a high degree of resistance to imatinib and all second-generation (2G) TKIs [4]. Before the advent of third-generation (3G) TKIs such as ponatinib, this mutation was associated with rapid progression and limited survival [5].

Ponatinib and the allosteric BCR-ABL1 (Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket [STAMP]) inhibitor asciminib are recommended for patients with the BCR-ABL1T315I mutation [6]. However, a subset of patients cannot achieve desired treatment outcomes. Certain drug-related adverse events (AEs) also present a formidable challenge despite dose optimization, including arterial occlusive events with ponatinib [7, 8]. In addition, ponatinib and asciminib are not available worldwide, particularly in emerging regions. It is thus an urgent unmet need to develop an alternative TKI that is efficacious and well tolerated.

Olverembatinib (HQP1351) is a novel, small-molecule, orally administered 3G BCR-ABL1 inhibitor designed with scaffold-hopping strategies that culminate in extensive donor–acceptor hydrogen bond networks [9, 10]. This innovative TKI exhibited potent in vitro inhibitory activity against both wild-type and mutant BCR-ABL1 (IC50 0.5 nM) and enhanced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in CML cells [11]. Olverembatinib also induced regression of subcutaneous CML cells expressing wild-type and mutant BCR-ABL1 (including T315I) in studies of xenograft and allograft animal models [9, 10]. The aim of the current study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacology of olverembatinib in patients with TKI-resistant chronic-phase or accelerated phase CML (CML-CP or CML-AP).


Study design

This was a phase 1/2, open-label, two-part study. Part 1 was a phase 1 “3 + 3” dose escalation and expansion study using a standard design, with 11 successive cohorts of TKI-resistant CML patients receiving oral olverembatinib at increasing alternate-day (QOD) doses of 1–60 mg. During dose escalation, the starting dose of olverembatinib was 1 mg administered orally QOD. Each cohort was assessed for safety over a treatment cycle of 28 days before enrolling the next cohort, in order to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), or the dose at which the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in no more than 33.0% of patients during the first cycle. DLT was defined as any of the following during the first 28 days of olverembatinib therapy (Cycle 1): (1) grade 3 or higher (G3+) nonhematologic AEs exceeding 3 days despite adequate supportive care; (2) missed doses due to toxicity (for > 25% of the first cycle); (3) febrile neutropenia unrelated to leukemia; or (4) G4 cytopenia (for > 28 days but unrelated to underlying disease, with < 5% cellularity in bone marrow). In the event of a lack of efficacy, the study permitted intrapatient dose escalation unless the olverembatinib regimen exceeded MTD. After that, dose expansion cohorts at targeted doses were initiated. The primary endpoint within the phase 1 study was the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( identifier was ChiCTR1900027568.

Part two was a phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of olverembatinib at RP2D in patients with T315I-mutated CML-CP and CML-AP. The primary endpoints of the phase 2 study were major cytogenetic response (MCyR) in patients with CML-CP and major hematologic response (MaHR) in those with CML-AP. In this phase 2 study, two pivotal open-label single-arm multicenter studies were performed ( identifiers NCT03883087 for the CML-CP study and NCT03883100 for the CML-AP study) and included adults with BCR-ABL1T315I-driven TKI resistance.

There were two other major differences between parts 1 and 2 of this study: (A) part 1 enrolled patients with a range of BCR-ABL1 genotypes, whereas part 2 enrolled only patients with the T315I “gatekeeper” mutation; and (B) part 1 enrolled patients with third-line (3L) or higher treatment, whereas part 2 also included patients with second-line (2L) TKIs because the T315I mutation confers resistance to all first- and second-generation TKIs.

Patient population

Eligible participants were adults with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)- or BCR-ABL1-positive CML-CP or CML-AP resistant to standard care in China, with disease phases diagnosed by 2013 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria [12]. In brief, parts 1 and 2 both included adults who had: (1) TKI-resistant or refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive and/or BCR-ABL1 fusion gene positive CML, (2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2, and (3) adequate organ function but not a range of conditions that can complicate TKI treatments, including cardiovascular and pulmonary vascular disorders.

Safety assessments

Adverse events were assessed continuously and graded according to NCI CTCAE v5.0.18. Complete blood count with differential, serum chemistries, and physical examinations were performed before the study; weekly during Cycles 1 and 2; on alternate weeks in Cycles 3 and 4; and monthly thereafter.

Efficacy assessments

Hematologic response to olverembatinib was evaluated before study entry and on Day 1 of each treatment cycle. Morphologic assessments and cytogenetic analyses using bone marrow were performed in local laboratories. Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays of BCR-ABL1 transcripts were performed on blood in two central laboratories before study entry and every 3 months thereafter (but every 2 months in phase 2 subjects with CML-AP) [13,14,15,16].

Sanger sequencing to identify BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations was performed in all patients before enrollment, while next-generation sequencing (NGS) via the Pacific Biosciences (PacBio®; Menlo Park, CA) RSII system detailed in previous studies [17] was used to identify BCR-ABL1 compound mutations (defined as ≥ 2 mutations in the same BCR-ABL1 molecule [18]) at Peking University People’s Hospital. Mutational analyses of the PacBio data were performed using custom python scripts. To control for false positives, the detection threshold for a single mutation site was set to 3.0% based on pre-experimental data. If the frequency of compound mutations exceeded 3.0%, they were considered to be true compound mutations. BCR-ABL1 splice isoforms were identified from full-length circular consensus sequence reads spanning the entire transcript.

Hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular response criteria were based on 2013 ELN recommendations [12], including complete hematologic response (CHR); major cytogenetic response (MCyR) or complete cytogenetic response (CCyR); as well as major molecular response (MMR), MR4.0, and MR4.5. Major hematologic response (MaHR) was defined as CHR or no evidence of leukemia and assessed in patients with CML-AP [12]. Progression included advances from CML-CP to CML-AP or blast phase CML (CML-BP) on olverembatinib.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

The phase 1 study included pharmacokinetic analyses, for which blood samples were collected on Cycle 1 Day 1–2 (C1D1-C1D2) and C1D27-C1D28. Blood samples were collected on C1D1 before dosing (baseline) as well as at 8 and 24 h after dosing on C1D1, C1D15, and C1D27. For pharmacodynamic evaluations, phosphorylated CRK-like (pCRKL) adaptor protein in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was assayed as a biomarker of BCR-ABL1 inhibition.

Statistical analyses

Patients receiving ≥ 1 dose of olverembatinib were included in safety analyses. Patients who did not reach a given endpoint at baseline were evaluated for responses on treatment. Response rates and two-sided exact (Clopper-Pearson) 95% confidential interval [CI] were calculated. Fine and Gray's model were used to identify co-variates associated with cytogenetic and molecular responses. Treatment discontinuation before response was considered a competing risk.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the start date of an effective dose to progression, death, or censorship at last contact. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the start date of an effective dose to all-cause death or censorship at last follow-up. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate durations of sustained response, PFS, and OS. Post hoc analyses were performed without multiple comparison adjustments, and nominal P values were reported. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


Patient characteristics

Between October 26, 2016, and October 8, 2019, 165 patients were enrolled: 127 with CML-CP and 38 with CML-AP. A total of 110 (66.7%) patients were men. The median age was 42 (range, 20–74) years (Table 1) and median interval from CML diagnosis to first olverembatinib dose 5.7 (range, 0.3–23.2) years. A total of 30 (18.2%) patients had received 1 prior TKI, 90 (54.5%) had 2 prior TKIs, and 45 (27.3%) at least 3. These second-line patients were predominantly male and in chronic phase (70% each), with a median time from diagnosis to olverembatinib treatment of 1.6 years and of 28 of them had T315I mutation identified by Sanger sequencing.

Table 1 Patient characteristics

Sanger sequencing identified 102 (61.8%) patients with a single T315I mutation, 25 (15.2%) with T315I and additional mutations, 14 (8.5%) with other mutations, and 24 (14.5%) with no BCR-ABL1 mutation. Corresponding data in 118 patients, (94 CML-CP and 24 CML-AP) receiving NGS were 53 (44.9%; single T315I mutation), 19 (16.1%; T315I and additional noncompound mutations), 14 (11.9%; other noncompound mutations), 12 (10.2%; compound mutations), and 20 (16.9%; no BCR-ABL1 mutation). Additional mutations observed in conjunction with T315I included phosphate-binding loop (P-loop) residue E255 (which confers resistance against imatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib), C-lobe residue F359 (nilotinib), and gatekeeper F317 (dasatinib).

Phase 1 study

A total of 101 patients with TKI-resistant CML were enrolled in the phase 1 study between October 26, 2016, and December 12, 2018. Among these 101 patients, 86 had CML-CP and 15, CML-AP. Sanger sequencing identified 46 (45.5%) patients with a single T315I mutation, 17 (16.8%) with T315I and additional mutations, 14 (13.9%) with other mutations, and 24 (23.8%) with no BCR-ABL1 mutation. Corresponding data in 94 patients (81 CML-CP and 13 CML-AP) receiving NGS were 33 (35.1%; single T315I mutation), 16 (17.0%; T315I and additional noncompound mutations), 13 (13.8%; other noncompound mutations), 12 (12.8%; compound mutations), and 20 (21.3%; no BCR-ABL1 mutation). Across 11 dose cohorts (1 to 60 mg QOD) in 28-day cycles, no DLT was observed at doses below 60 mg. Two of three patients in the 60 mg cohort experienced DLTs, including 1 G4 thrombocytopenia and 1 myocardial injury, which resulted in dose interruption. Among 33 patients in dose escalation, the MTD was 50 mg. Based on preliminary safety and efficacy results, we expanded the 30, 40, and 50 mg QOD dose cohorts. Finally, the RP2D was established as 40 mg QOD.

Phase 2 study

After determination of RP2D, two pivotal studies were initiated at 10 sites in China from April 26, 2019, to October 8, 2019, that enrolled 41 patients with T315I-mutated CML-CP and 23 with T315I-mutated CML-AP. More than 60% of patients were treated in second-line therapy. Sanger sequencing identified 37 (90.2%) patients with a single T315I mutation and 4 (9.8%) with T315I and additional mutations in CML-CP; while patients with CML-AP were 19 (82.6%) with a single T315I mutation and 4 (17.4%) with T315I and additional mutations. Corresponding data in 24 patients (13 CML-CP and 11 CML-AP) receiving NGS were 11 (84.6%) with a single T315I mutation, 1 (7.7%) with T315I and additional noncompound mutations, and 1 (7.7%) with other noncompound mutations in patients with CML-CP, as well as 9 (81.8%; single T315I mutation) and 2 (18.2%; T315I and additional noncompound mutations) in those with CML-AP.

Patient disposition

By September 30, 2021, the median follow-up was 34.3 (range, 4.8–58.6) months. A total of 114 (69.0%) patients remained on treatment at doses of 20 (n = 11), 30 (n = 44), 40 (n = 48), or 50 mg (n = 11) QOD (Table 2). Treatment interruptions due to AEs occurred in 86 (52.1%) patients, including 58 (45.7%) with CML-CP and 28 (73.7%) with CML-AP. Median number and duration of treatment interruptions were 2 (range, 1–11) and 56 (range, 1–421) days.

Table 2 Patient disposition

Doses were reduced because of AEs in 50 (30.3%) patients, including 36 (28.3%) with CML-CP and 14 (36.8%) with CML-AP. The most common AE leading to dose reduction was severe thrombocytopenia (n = 26; 15.8%). Fifty-one patients permanently discontinued treatment because of either CML progression (n = 15; 9.1%), AEs (n = 13; 7.9%), treatment failure (n = 12; 7.0%), consent withdrawal (n = 8; 4.8%), or death (n = 3; 1.8%) (Table 2).


The median treatment duration was 30.7 (range, 1.2–58.6) months. All 165 patients experienced at least 1 treatment-related AE (TRAE), of which 131 (79.4%) were G3/4 (Table 3). The most frequent nonhematologic TRAE was skin hyperpigmentation in 139 (84.2%) patients with pathologically confirmed lentiginous nevus in 2 patients, followed by hypertriglyceridemia (57.6%), proteinuria (50.9%), hyperbilirubinemia (41.8%), hypocalcemia (38.8%), and elevated liver transaminases (35.8%). Median time to onset of these TRAEs was 70 (range, 1–1,315) days.

Table 3 Treatment-related adverse events (≥ 10%, all grade)

Cardiovascular events (CVEs) possibly related to olverembatinib were observed in 53 (32.1%) patients at a median of 11 (range, 0.03–53) months on treatment, including hypertension (13.3%), pericardial effusion (8.5%), ventricular extrasystoles (4.2%), supraventricular extrasystoles or atrial fibrillation (3.0% each), retinal-vein occlusion (1.8%) or palpitations (1.2%); as well as angina pectoris, arrhythmia, atrial tachycardia, cardiomegaly, cerebral ischemia, and/or cerebral infarction in < 1%; of which 11.5% were G3/4.

The median age of patients with CVEs was 43 (range, 20–74) years, including two patients with a history of hypertension and three with prior diabetes. All patients with CVEs were required to have temporary olverembatinib treatment suspension and received disease-specific treatment. Most recovered or improved and received olverembatinib treatment at a reduced dose except for one patient who discontinued because of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and one patient who died of pericardial effusion. None of these patients had a Fridericia-corrected QT interval exceeding 500 ms on treatment. Grade 3/4 hematologic TRAEs included thrombocytopenia (51.5%), neutropenia (11.5%), and anemia (23.0%) (Table 3). Myelosuppression tended to occur early, with a median (range) onset time of 28 (4–676) days and a median (range) duration of 36 (7–718) days. Most resolved after temporary treatment suspension or supportive care, including platelet or erythrocyte transfusion or dose adjustment. A total of 11.5% patients received platelet transfusions and 9.7% patients received red blood cell transfusions. Except for skin hyperpigmentation and proteinuria, incidences of TRAEs decreased over time during the follow-up period (Fig. 1). Patients with persistent proteinuria did not observe decreased renal function according to estimated glomerular filtration rate. Serious AEs (SAEs; in ≥ 1% of patients) included thrombocytopenia (9.0%), anemia (6.0%), pneumonia (3.0%), pyrexia or atrial fibrillation (2.0% each); as well as acute MI, cholelithiasis, pericardial effusion, upper-respiratory-tract infection, and urinary-tract infection (1% each). Most SAEs resolved after temporary treatment suspension or dose reduction, which was required in 75 (46.0%) patients at a median of 5 (range 1–36) months.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prevalence of treatment-related adverse events over time



The median follow-up period of 126 evaluable patients with CML-CP since the start of an effective dose (≥ 30 mg QOD) was 37 (range, 7–58) months. All 84 patients without baseline CHR achieved this endpoint. Of 121 patients without MCyR at baseline, 96 (79.3%) and 84 (69.4%) achieved MCyR and CCyR at a median of 3 (range, 3–36) and 3 (range, 3–37) months, respectively. Among 126 patients, 70 (55.6%) achieved MMR, 56 (44.4%) MR4.0, and 49 (38.9%) MR4.5 on olverembatinib therapy. Cytogenetic and molecular response rates increased over time (Fig. 2A). The cumulative 3-year incidences of MCyR, CCyR, MMR, MR4.0, and MR4.5 were 78.6% (95% CI: 70.0%, 85.0%), 69.0% (59·7%, 76·5%), 55.9% (46.5%, 64.4%), 43.5% (34.6%, 52.1%), and 38.6% (30.0%, 47.1%), respectively. The probabilities of sustained MCyR, CCyR, and MMR at 3 years were 77.3% (66.8%, 84.8%), 72.2% (60.4%, 81.1%), and 76.0% (62.1%, 85.3%), respectively. A total of 5 patients progressed to CML-AP (n = 4) or CML-BP (n = 1). Seven patients died of disease progression (n = 3) and one each of either pericardial effusion, gastric cancer, hepatitis E virus infection (with prior autoimmune hepatitis), or an unknown reason. Probabilities of PFS and OS at 3 years were 92.0% (86.0%, 96.0%) and 94.0% (89.0%, 97.0%), respectively (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cumulative incidence of responses in the chronic phase (A) and accelerated phase (B) MCyR, major cytogenetic response; CCyR, complete cytogenetic response; MMR, major molecular response; MR4.0, molecular response 4; MR4.5, molecular response 4.5.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the chronic phase (A) or accelerated phase (B)


The median follow-up was 27 (range, 5–56) months since the onset of an effective dose. Among 37 patients without baseline MaHR, 29 (78.4%) met this endpoint at a median of 3 (range, 1–7) months; and 27 (73%) experienced CHR at a median of 3 (range, 1–14) months. Of the 38 patients without baseline MCyR, 18 (47.4%) achieved MCyR and CCyR at a median of 3 (range, 1–9) months and 4 (range, 1–15) months. MMR and MR4.0 were achieved by 17 (44.7%) and 14 (36.8%) patients, respectively, and MR4.5 by 13 (34.2%) patients. Cytogenetic and molecular response rates increased over time (Fig. 2B). The 3-year cumulative incidences of achieving MCyR, CCyR, MMR, MR4.0, and MR4.5 were 47.4% (30.7%, 62.4%), 47.4% (30.6%, 62.4%), 44.7% (28.2%, 60.0%), 39.3% (22.3%, 56.0%), and 32.1% (17.6%, 47.6%), respectively. The probabilities of sustained MCyR and CCyR at 3 years were 86.0% (55.0%, 97.0%) and 71% (44.0%, 87.0%). A total of 11 patients had CML that progressed to blast phase, and 4 died. Probabilities of PFS and OS at 3 years were 60.0% (41.0%, 74.0%) and 71% (54.0%, 83.0%), respectively (Fig. 3B).

Responses according to BCR-ABL1 mutation status via Sanger sequencing

Among the four subgroups with CML-CP evaluated by Sanger sequencing, patients with a single T315I mutation had the highest 3-year cumulative incidences of achieving MCyR (85.3%), CCyR (76.0%), MMR (68.7%), MR4.0 (59.3%), and MR4.5 (54.7%); those with no BCR-ABL1 mutation had the lowest cumulative incidences of MCyR (59.1%), CCyR (50.0%), MMR (9.1%), MR4.0 (4.5%), and MR4.5 (0) (all P values among the four subgroups < 0.0001; Fig. 4A). Among patients with CML-AP, those with a single T315I mutation also had the highest 2-year cumulative incidences of MCyR or CCyR (60.0% each), MMR (52.0%), and MR4.0 or MR4.5 (40.0% each); followed by those with T315I and an additional mutation, who had MCyR, CCyR, or MMR (33.3% each), MR4.0 (22.2%), and MR4.5 (11.1%). No cytogenetic or molecular response was observed in patients with no BCR-ABL1 mutation or with other mutations at enrollment (Fig. 4B). We interrogated baseline covariates to evaluate associations with cytogenetic and molecular responses (Table 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Responses by baseline BCR-ABL1 mutation status in the chronic phase (A) or accelerated phase (B) using Sanger sequencing. CCyR, complete cytogenetic response; MCyR, major cytogenetic response; MMR, major molecular response; MR4.0, molecular response 4; MR4.5, molecular response 4.5

Table 4 Multivariate analysis results of variables associated with treatment responses

In multivariate analyses, BCR-ABL1 mutation status before study entry was independently associated with higher cumulative incidences of achieving CCyR (P = 0.02), MMR (P = 0.006), MR4.0 (P = 0.006), and MR4.5 (P < 0.0001). Compared to no mutation or other mutation status, a single T315I mutation showed higher responses (or a trend in this direction). In addition, a longer interval from CML diagnosis to olverembatinib treatment onset, CML-AP rather than CML-CP, and more prior TKIs were significantly associated with lower rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses.

Responses according to BCR-ABL1 mutation status via NGS

Findings on treatment responses stratified by BCR-ABL1 mutation status with NGS paralleled those with Sanger sequencing (Fig. 5). Among 12 patients (7 with CML-CP and 5 with CML-AP) with compound mutations (Table 5), 8 (67.0%) had T315I-inclusive compound mutations; and 9 (75.0%), 2 (17.0%), and 1 (8.0%) had 1, 2, and 3 compound mutations, respectively. A total of 7 (58.0%) achieved MMR and 3 (25.0%) MR.4.5 By the last follow-up date, 3 patients had progressed to CML-AP or CML-BP and died, and 7 remained on treatment with olverembatinib, of whom one had CCyR and two each had CHR, MMR, or MR.4.5

Fig. 5
figure 5

Responses by baseline BCR-ABL1 mutation status in the chronic phase (A) or accelerated phase (B) using next-generation sequencing. CCyR, complete cytogenetic response; MCyR, major cytogenetic response; MMR, major molecular response; MR4.0, molecular response 4; MR4.5, molecular response 4.5

Table 5 Characteristics of 12 patients harboring compound mutations at baseline

In multivariate analyses, BCR-ABL1 mutation status before study entry was independently associated with cumulative incidences of achieving MMR (P = 0.002), MR4.0 (P < 0.0001), and MR4.5 (P < 0.0001; Table 4). A single T315I mutation was also significantly associated with higher molecular response rates; compound mutation was comparable to other mutation status except no mutations; and no mutation was associated with lower response rates. In addition, longer intervals from CML diagnosis to olverembatinib treatment onset, CML-AP (rather than CML-CP), more prior TKIs, and increasing age were significantly associated with lower rates of cytogenetic and/or molecular responses.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Based on plasma concentration–time curves on treatment Days 1 and 27, olverembatinib pharmacokinetics were linear, with mean terminal elimination half-life values (17.5–36.5 h) that are well suited to QOD administration (Fig. 6). Systemic exposure and maximum concentration were approximately dose proportional across olverembatinib doses (1–60 mg QOD). With multiple dosing, slight to moderate accumulation of olverembatinib was observed on C1D27. Significant dose- and time-dependent reductions in pCRKL levels (indicative of BCR-ABL1 inhibition) were observed within 8 h after olverembatinib dosing (30–50 mg QOD) on C1D1 and maintained at steady state on C1D15 and C1D27 (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Pharmacokinetics, mean plasma concentration–time curves on treatment Days 1 (A) and 27 (B)

Fig. 7
figure 7

Pharmacodynamics by dose cohorts on Cycle 1 (A) and on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (B)


We report that novel 3G TKI olverembatinib was well tolerated and efficacious in patients with heavily pretreated, TKI-resistant CML-CP and CML-AP. It exerted robust and durable antitumor activity in patients with a range of potentially clinically challenging BCR-ABL1 genotypes, including the T315I mutation and compound mutations, which confer treatment resistance or otherwise complicate management with other TKIs [19,20,21,22].

The most common and persistent nonhematologic AE with olverembatinib was lentiginous nevus, which presented as scattered benign lesions with no regression that did not require intervention. This unique skin change has not been reported in previous TKI cancer studies and might be explained by off-target inhibition of multiple kinases by olverembatinib, although the precise mechanism needs to be elucidated. The most common hematologic TRAE was severe thrombocytopenia, which had a higher incidence than in phase 1 and phase 2 pivotal studies of ponatinib in US studies but similar to that in Japanese patients receiving ponatinib [23, 24]. This TRAE occurred chiefly in the early stage of olverembatinib treatment and may require special attention and intervention, including possible treatment suspension, dose reduction, or platelet transfusion.

Drug-related CVEs are a concern with 3G TKIs. It should be noted that the leading CVE was hypertension (in 13% of patients) and that such events were grade 1 or 2 in 88.5% of patients. During a median follow-up of nearly 3 years, olverembatinib-related CVEs occurred in 32.0% of patients, including a 5.0% incidence of arterial occlusive and venous thrombotic events; this value is lower than the 31.0% reported with ponatinib during a median follow-up of 5 years [25]. However, patients in our study were on average more than 15 years younger and had fewer pre-existing cardiovascular comorbidities (as driven by the eligibility criteria), which would tend to translate into a lower baseline risk of vascular occlusive events. Our trials’ relatively limited follow-up period (vs ponatinib studies) may also contribute to the difference in drug-related CVEs. To further assess the cardiovascular safety profile of olverembatinib, larger patient samples and longer follow-up intervals are required. In future practice, it may be useful to assess and/or stratify cardiovascular risk on TKI treatment via well-validated indices such as the Framingham equations and nomograms.

In general, the effectiveness of olverembatinib was comparable to findings from studies on ponatinib and asciminib [7, 26]. Patients with a single T315I mutation in our study had better cytogenetic and molecular responses to olverembatinib than those with other genotypes. One potential explanation of this finding is that olverembatinib has more specific activity against the T315I mutation, which is consistent with the primary purpose of designing olverembatinib to enhance activity against specific BCR-ABL1 mutants, including the gatekeeper and genetic variants affecting the P-loop and hinge regions. The effect of the highly specific targeting of the T315I mutation observed with olverembatinib seems to be more pronounced than with ponatinib, which was reported to exert antileukemic activity regardless of baseline BCR-ABL1 mutation status in the phase 2 ponatinib Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and CML evaluation (PACE) and Optimizing Ponatinib Treatment in CML (OPTIC) studies [7, 8]; and asciminib, which targets the T315I mutation but requires higher doses in both in vitro and in vivo studies [26, 27].

Drug-resistant compound mutations within the BCR-ABL1 kinase domain have been reported in many patients receiving sequential TKI therapy. Our study documents definitive responses to olverembatinib in patients with TKI-resistant, heavily pretreated CML-CP or CML-AP with T315I-inclusive or non-T315I-inclusive compound mutations. These responses included MMR and MR4.5 in 7 of 12 patients regardless of the type of compound mutation.

Taken together, these findings suggest impressive antileukemic activity of olverembatinib that warrants verification in further studies. In contrast, BCR-ABL1 compound mutations have been recognized as a potential mechanism of ponatinib treatment failure, which is more commonly detected in CML-AP and Ph+ ALL than in CML-CP [7, 19, 28]. On the other hand, non-T315I compound mutants usually retain sensitivity to at least one TKI (especially ponatinib). T315I-inclusive compound mutations confer resistance against all available TKIs, including ponatinib. In general, BCR-ABL1 compound mutations represent an important clinical challenge.

Potential limitations of our phase 1/2 studies are fourfold. First, we enrolled only Chinese patients with CML and TKI resistance and excluded ponatinib failures. (The 3G TKI is not available in China.) Second, we observed a relatively high number of patients with CML and T315I single mutations and T315I plus additional mutations; conversely, fewer patients had other BCR-ABL1 mutations or compound mutations. Third, relatively few patients had CML-AP. We adjusted for these potential confounding variables by conducting multivariate analyses. Fourth, the younger age of Chinese patients, which is consistent with overall fewer and less severe comorbidities, might tend to skew both our safety and efficacy results more positively. As such, our conclusions concerning the safety and efficacy of olverembatinib need to be confirmed in future studies with larger sample sizes and more racially and ethnically diverse populations.


This phase 1/2 study showed that olverembatinib is well tolerated and exhibited robust and durable activity in patients with TKI-resistant CML-CP and CML-AP. In particular, olverembatinib was highly active against BCR-ABL1T315I mutants and demonstrated encouraging clinical activity against compound mutations. Three Chinese pivotal phase trials ( NCT03883087, NCT03883100, and NCT04126681) and one US phase 1b trial (NCT04260022) are ongoing.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to this is an ongoing clinical trial containing patients’ information but are available from the sponsor company and corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history



Adverse event


Acute lymphoblastic leukemia


Complete cytogenetic response


Complete hematologic response


Confidential interval


Chronic myeloid leukemia


Accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia


Chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia


Cardiovascular event


Dose-limiting toxicity


European LeukemiaNet


Hazard ratio


Major hematologic response


Major cytogenetic response


Myocardial infarction


Major molecular response

MR4.0 :

4 Log reduction in BCR-ABL1 transcripts: ≤ 0.01%


(1/10,000) Of cells have the BCR-ABL1 gene


4.5 Log reduction in BCR-ABL1 transcripts: ≤ 0.0032% (1/32,000) cells have the BCR-ABL1 gene Maximum tolerated dose


National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events


Next-generation sequencing


Overall survival


Partial cytogenetic response


Progression-free survival


Every other day


Serious adverse events


Tyrosine kinase inhibitor


Treatment-related adverse events


  1. Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, Cortes J, Shah S, Ayala M, et al. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(24):2260–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre P, Etienne G, Lobo C, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(24):2251–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang J, Shen ZX, Saglio G, Jin J, Huang H, Hu Y, et al. Phase 3 study of nilotinib vs imatinib in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTchina. Blood. 2015;125(18):2771–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Soverini S, Branford S, Nicolini FE, Talpaz M, Deininger MW, Martinelli G, et al. Implications of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain-mediated resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2014;38(1):10–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicolini FE, Mauro MJ, Martinelli G, Kim DW, Soverini S, Müller MC, et al. Epidemiologic study on survival of chronic myeloid leukemia and Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with BCR-ABL T315I mutation. Blood. 2009;114(26):5271–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deininger MW, Shah NP, Altman JK, Berman E, Bhatia R, Bhatnagar B, et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(10):1385–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cortes JE, Kim DW, Pinilla-Ibarz J, le Coutre P, Paquette R, Chuah C, et al. A phase 2 trial of ponatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(19):1783–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cortes J, Apperley J, Lomaia E, Moiraghi B, Undurraga Sutton M, Pavlovsky C, et al. Ponatinib dose-ranging study in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized, open-label phase 2 clinical trial. Blood. 2021;138(21):2042–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ren X, Pan X, Zhang Z, Wang D, Lu X, Li Y, et al. Identification of GZD824 as an orally bioavailable inhibitor that targets phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (Bcr-Abl) kinase and overcomes clinically acquired mutation-induced resistance against imatinib. J Med Chem. 2013;56(3):879–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ye W, Jiang Z, Lu X, Ren X, Deng M, Lin S, et al. GZD824 suppresses the growth of human B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells by inhibiting the SRC kinase and PI3K/AKT pathways. Oncotarget. 2017;8(50):87002–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Y, Zhang L, Tang X, Luo J, Tu Z, Jiang K, et al. GZD824 as a FLT3, FGFR1 and PDGFRα inhibitor against leukemia in vitro and in vivo. Transl Oncol. 2020;13(4): 100766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, Hochhaus A, Soverini S, Apperley JF, et al. European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. Blood. 2013;122(6):872–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, Hochhaus A, Simonsson B, Appelbaum F, et al. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2006;108(6):1809–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F, Niederwieser D, Saglio G, Apperley J, et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(35):6041–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baccarani M, Pane F, Saglio G. Monitoring treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2008;93(2):161–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Brien SAC, Akhtari M et al. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Chronic myelogenous leukemia, version 1.2013. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). 2013;

  17. Cavelier L, Ameur A, Haggqvist S, Hoijer I, Cahill N, Olsson-Stromberg U, et al. Clonal distribution of BCR-ABL1 mutations and splice isoforms by single-molecule long-read RNA sequencing. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Khorashad JS, Kelley TW, Szankasi P, Mason CC, Soverini S, Adrian LT, et al. BCR-ABL1 compound mutations in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant CML: frequency and clonal relationships. Blood. 2013;121(3):489–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zabriskie MS, Eide CA, Tantravahi SK, Vellore NA, Estrada J, Nicolini FE, et al. BCR-ABL1 compound mutations combining key kinase domain positions confer clinical resistance to ponatinib in Ph chromosome-positive leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(3):428–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah NP, Skaggs BJ, Branford S, Hughes TP, Nicoll JM, Paquette RL, et al. Sequential ABL kinase inhibitor therapy selects for compound drug-resistant BCR-ABL mutations with altered oncogenic potency. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(9):2562–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eide CA, Zabriskie MS, Savage Stevens SL, Antelope O, Vellore NA, Than H, et al. Combining the allosteric inhibitor asciminib with ponatinib suppresses emergence of and restores efficacy against highly resistant BCR-ABL1 mutants. Cancer Cell. 2019;36(4):431-45 e5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gleixner KV, Filik Y, Berger D, Schewzik C, Stefanzl G, Sadovnik I, et al. Asciminib and ponatinib exert synergistic anti-neoplastic effects on CML cells expressing BCR-ABL1 (T315I)-compound mutations. Am J Cancer Res. 2021;11(9):4470–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cortes JE, Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Bixby D, Mauro MJ, Flinn I, et al. Ponatinib in refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(22):2075–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tojo A, Kyo T, Yamamoto K, Nakamae H, Takahashi N, Kobayashi Y, et al. Ponatinib in Japanese patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia, a phase 1/2 study. Int J Hematol. 2017;106(3):385–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cortes JE, Kim DW, Pinilla-Ibarz J, le Coutre PD, Paquette R, Chuah C, et al. Ponatinib efficacy and safety in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia: final 5-year results of the phase 2 PACE trial. Blood. 2018;132(4):393–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hughes TP, Mauro MJ, Cortes JE, Minami H, Rea D, DeAngelo DJ, et al. Asciminib in chronic myeloid leukemia after ABL kinase inhibitor failure. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(24):2315–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schoepfer J, Jahnke W, Berellini G, Buonamici S, Cotesta S, Cowan-Jacob SW, et al. Discovery of Asciminib (ABL001), an allosteric inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity of BCR-ABL1. J Med Chem. 2018;61(18):8120–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Deininger MW, Hodgson JG, Shah NP, Cortes JE, Kim DW, Nicolini FE, et al. Compound mutations in BCR-ABL1 are not major drivers of primary or secondary resistance to ponatinib in CP-CML patients. Blood. 2016;127(6):703–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Jean-Pierre Issa, MD, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Coriell Institute for Medical Research (Camden, NJ), and David Sidransky, MD, Director of Head and Neck Cancer Research in the Department of Otolaryngology (Head and Neck Surgery), Johns Hopkins University, for reviewing and commenting on the manuscript. Ashutosh K. Pathak, MD, PhD, MBA, FRCP (Edin.), Stephen W. Gutkin, Ndiya Ogba, PhD, and Paul Fletcher, PhD, with Ascentage Pharma provided further substantive input in manuscript research and preparation.


This work was supported partially by National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2018ZX09301021-005), National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFA0104500), Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81621001), Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81530046, 81930004), National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81770161, No. 81970140), and Ascentage Pharma Group Corp Ltd (Hong Kong).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



QJ, XH, DY, and YZ designed the research. All authors performed the research and collected data. QJ, ZL, XH, QN, LM, and ZC verified the data accessed and verified the data. QJ, ZL, XH, QN, LM, and ZC analyzed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors had access to primary clinical data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaojun Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Studies were conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, with protocols approved by institutional review boards. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to the initiation of any study-specific procedures.

Consent for publication

All authors confirmed and had consent to publish the manuscript on Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

Competing interests

ZC, QN, SZ, LM, ML, HW, CY, DY, and YZ: Employees of, and shareholders in, Ascentage Pharma. DY and YZ: Hold positions of leadership within Ascentage. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, Q., Li, Z., Qin, Y. et al. Olverembatinib (HQP1351), a well-tolerated and effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with T315I-mutated chronic myeloid leukemia: results of an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 trial. J Hematol Oncol 15, 113 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Chronic myeloid leukemia
  • Chronic phase
  • Accelerated phase
  • T315I mutation
  • Tyrosine kinase inhibitor