Skip to main content

Prognostic landscape of mitochondrial genome in myelodysplastic syndrome after stem-cell transplantation

Abstract

Despite mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations are common events in cancer, their global frequency and clinical impact have not been comprehensively characterized in patients with myelodysplastic neoplasia (also known as myelodysplastic syndromes, MDS). Here we performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on samples obtained before allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from 494 patients with MDS who were enrolled in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. We evaluated the impact of mtDNA mutations on transplantation outcomes, including overall survival (OS), relapse, relapse-free survival (RFS), and transplant-related mortality (TRM). A random survival forest algorithm was applied to evaluate the prognostic performance of models that include mtDNA mutations alone and combined with MDS- and HCT-related clinical factors. A total of 2666 mtDNA mutations were identified, including 411 potential pathogenic variants. We found that overall, an increased number of mtDNA mutations was associated with inferior transplantation outcomes. Mutations in several frequently mutated mtDNA genes (e.g., MT-CYB and MT-ND5) were identified as independent predictors of OS, RFS, relapse and/or TRM after allo-HCT. Integration of mtDNA mutations into the models based on the Revised International Prognostic Scores (IPSS-R) and clinical factors related to MDS and allo-HCT could capture more prognostic information and significantly improve the prognostic stratification efforts. Our study represents the first WGS effort in MDS receiving allo-HCT and shows that there may be clinical utility of mtDNA variants to predict allo-HCT outcomes in combination with more standard clinical parameters.

To the Editor,

Myelodysplastic neoplasia (also known as myelodysplastic syndromes, MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematopoietic cell disorders characterized by blood cytopenias and a tendency to progress to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1]. Despite treatment advances, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative therapy for MDS. However, mortality after allo-HCT is high due to disease relapse and transplant-related complications [1]. Deciding which MDS patients will most likely benefit from allo-HCT is challenging given the clinical and biological heterogeneity of the disease [1]. Previous genomic analyses have shown that mutations in specific nuclear genes (e.g., TP53) could inform prognostic stratification of MDS undergoing allo-HCT [2]. Surprisingly, despite the critical role of mitochondria in energy production, heme biosynthesis and metabolism [3], there has not yet been a comprehensive evaluation of mutations in the mitochondrial genome on transplant outcomes for MDS.

To address this knowledge gap, we performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on whole blood samples obtained before allo-HCT from 494 patients with MDS and analyzed their mitochondrial genomes (Additional file 2: Table S1). All patients were of European ancestry. Details of mtDNA analysis are provided in Additional file 3. We identified 2666 mtDNA variants (2542 substitutions and 124 small indels), 250 (9.4%) of which have not been reported in the MITOMAP database (Fig. 1A). Among them, 411 variants are putative pathogenic, with the majority (95%) having low allele frequency (AF < 1%) in our cohort. This is consistent with the ACMG/AMP assessment that pathogenic variants tend to be rare [4]. The mitochondrial control region (also known as the D-Loop) was the most frequently mutated region with 14.4% of the variants located in this region (Fig. 1B and C). The most frequently mutated protein-coding gene was MT-ND5 (16%), followed by MT-CO1 (14%). Eight percent of the variants were in the mitochondrial MT-tRNA genes. Mutational signature analysis showed that T > C and C > T transitions were the predominant substitutions in MDS (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). These results are consistent with previous reports from small-scale MDS studies [5].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mitochondrial genomic landscape in MDS. A Human mtDNA map showing genes and intergenic regions in the circular plot. Colors of the circular bars represent mtDNA regions. mtDNA encodes 22 transfer RNAs (tRNAs), two ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and 13 proteins for the mitochondrial OXPHOS apparatus. These 13 components include seven (ND1, 2, 3, 4, 4L, 5, 6) of complex I, one (CYB) of the 11 subunits of complex III, three (CO1, 2, 3) of the 13 subunits of complex IV, and two (ATP6, 8) of the 16 subunits of complex V. Dots inside the circular plot represent substitutions of mtDNA identified in 494 MDS patients. Classes of substitutions are presented color-coded. Vertical axes represent the heteroplasmic fraction of each variant. B Number of mtDNA variants at different mtDNA genes. Colors represent the biotype of the variant. C Frequency and distribution of variants within the mitochondrial genome. Variant frequency normalized by dividing the number of variants per locus of each patient by length of the locus (kbp). D Associations between mtDNA variants and MDS clinical factors. The top panel displays the number of mtDNA variants per patient sorted first by the IPSS-R score, then by the number of mtDNA variants. A heatmap showing the location of each variant on the mitochondrial genome (middle), where the color of each bar represents the number of mtDNA variants in each gene. The mitochondrial genes are represented on the left. The bottom panel shows the clinical covariates for all 494 patients: Age, IPSS-R score, KPS, MDS types and present of cytogenetic abnormities and TP53 mutational status

The median number of mtDNA mutations identified per patient was 37 (ranging from 4 to 157). Presence of mtDNA mutations was not associated with patient age at transplant, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), the Revised International Prognostic Score (IPSS-R), MDS types, or cytogenetic abnormalities (all P > 0.05, Fig. 1D). Overall, an increase in the number of mitochondrial mutations was significantly associated with a decrease in overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01–1.22; P = 0.029), higher risk of relapse (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00–1.27; P = 0.049) and shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04–1.24; P = 0.007). Analyses for each putative pathogenic variant observed 13 rare variants (11 missense and 2 stop-gain) that were associated with at least one of the four post-transplant outcomes (i.e., OS, relapse, RFS, and transplant-related mortality (TRM)) after Bonferroni correction (P < 0.05/411 = 1.22 × 10–4) (Additional file 2: Table S2). All these 13 variants were present in a heteroplasmic state, with HF levels ranging from 1% to 68.2%. Common variants (AF ≥ 1%) that were associated with posttransplant outcomes at P values < 0.05 were listed in Additional file 2: Tables S3–S6, 23 of which were associated with more than one outcome. Among them, MT-CO3 m.9656 T > C, MT-ND2 m.5495 T > C, and MT-CYB m.15607A > G reached Bonferroni-adjusted threshold (P < 0.05/27 = 1.85 × 10–3) in the conditional analysis. The Fine-Gray model derived similar results for relapse and TRM, with minor differences (Additional file 2: Tables S5–S6).

Gene-based analyses yielded significant associations with OS for MT-CYB (P = 1.04 × 10–3), MT-ND2 (P = 3.06 × 10–3) and MT-ND4 (P = 1.41 × 10–3) after Bonferroni correction (P < 0.05/16 = 3.13 × 10–3). For RFS, significant associations were observed for MT-CYB (P = 2.78 × 10–3) and MT-ND4 (P = 7.75 × 10–4). Four mtDNA genes were significantly associated with relapse, including MT-CYB (P = 7.03 × 10–4), MT-ND2 (P = 5.92 × 10–4), MT-ND5 (P = 1.91 × 10–3) and MT-tRNA (P = 1.99 × 10–4). Two mtDNA genes (MT-CYB and MT-ND4L) were significantly associated with TRM, with P values of 2.24 × 10–3 and 4.91 × 10–4 for MT-CYB and MT-ND4L, respectively (Additional file 2: Table S7). Additional significantly associated mitochondrial genes were also observed in burden test and/or SKAT (Additional file 2: Table S8 and Additional file 1: Figs. S2–S5). Most of these associated genes are located on the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC). ETC function is coupled to oxidative phosphorylation and the production of metabolites by the tricarboxylic acid cycle [6]. Mutations on these genes could result in complex dysfunction and abnormal reactive oxygen species production, which further promotes tumorigenesis and tumor progression [7].

Sixteen haplogroups were predicted in our cohort. Consistent with previous studies in non-Hispanic whites, haplogroup H was the most common haplogroup in our cohort [8]. Compared to haplogroup H, haplogroup I was significantly associated with worse OS (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.23–4.35; P = 0.01) and shorter RFS (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.09–3.83; P = 0.03). Haplogroup K was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.03–2.81; P = 0.04) (Additional file 2: Table S9).

To investigate whether mtDNA mutations could improve the prognostic stratification of MDS receiving allo-HCT, we fitted random survival forest models with and without inclusion of mtDNA mutations in the models (Additional file 1: Fig. S6). The model based only on mtDNA genes had a c-index of 0.58 to predict OS, which was slightly higher than the IPSS-R (c-index = 0.48) and clinical model (IPSS-R plus MDS type and pre-transplantation treatments, c-index = 0.57). Adding mtDNA genes improved the predictive performance of the model, with the c-index increasing from 0.48 to 0.63 for the IPSS-R model and from 0.57 to 0.66 for the clinical model (Fig. 2). Similar results were observed for the models in predicting RFS, relapse and TRM. Because IPSS-R is the currently available clinical scoring system to predict OS and leukemic transformation of MDS, we further examined the reclassification properties of adding mtDNA mutations to the IPSS-R model in predicting OS and relapse (Additional file 1: Fig. S7). The model with mtDNA mutations up-staged 18.6%, 41.7%, and 52.5% of the patients having lower-risk IPSS-R scores and down-staged 35.1%, 14.7% and 1.6% of the patients having higher-risk IPSS-R scores for 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS, respectively. For relapse, the model with mtDNA mutations up-staged 18.8%, 22.0%, and 22.0% of the patients having lower-risk IPSS-R scores and down-staged 26.2%, 35.6% and 35.6% of the patients having higher-risk IPSS-R scores for 1-, 2-, and 5-year risk of relapse, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prognostic impact of mtDNA variants in MDS. Prognostic models are presented color-coded. X-axes represent the C-index of the each model, with the values of the C-index showing inside of each bar. P values are the differences between the models with and without mtDNA variants

Most recently, Bernard et al. developed a clinical-molecular prognostic model, termed the IPSS-Molecular (IPSS-M) model, which combines somatic mutations of 31 genes with hematologic and cytogenetic parameters [9]. The IPSS-M improved prognostic discrimination across all clinical end points and reclassified 46% of MDS patients as compared to the IPSS-R model, demonstrating the importance and clinical utility of recurrent mutations in MDS risk stratification [9]. Although our current analysis focused on the prognostic significance of mtDNA mutations, to investigate whether mtDNA mutations could provide additional prognostic stratification to the recurrent mutations, we further conducted stratified analysis by TP53 mutation status. We chose TP53 mutation as an example because our group and others have repeatedly identified TP53 mutation as a powerful predictor of MDS survival after transplantation [2, 9,10,11]. However, more than 80% of MDS patients do not carry TP53 mutations. In these patients, additional prognostic markers are needed to further stratify their posttransplant outcomes [2, 10, 11]. In our MDS cohort, TP53 mutations were present in 11% of the patients and as expected, were associated with shorter OS, increased risk of relapse, shorter RFS and worse TRM than those without TP53 mutations (all log-rank P < 0.01, Additional file 1: Fig. S8). The presence of TP53 mutations was not correlated with the number of mtDNA mutations, nor the mutation status of each mtDNA gene (all P > 0.05, Fig. 1D). Of note, mtDNA mutations could provide additional prognostic stratification for patients who don’t carry TP53 mutations and improved the predictive performance of the models based on the IPSS-R and clinical factors (Additional file 2: Table S10). These findings suggest that mtDNA mutations could provide additional prognostic stratification information to the recurrent nuclear DNA mutations. However, we did not systematically evaluate the accumulated effects of nuclear DNA mutations and mtDNA mutations on patient survival, which requires further investigation.

In conclusion, this was the first attempt to characterize mtDNA genomic landscape in MDS receiving allo-HCT. Our results provide novel insights into the clinical utility of mtDNA mutations and could serve as a proof of concept that integration of mtDNA mutations into the scoring system to improve the clinical decision-making. Further studies are needed to better understand the biological mechanisms, and new techniques for mitochondrial genome editing are required to help restore mitochondrial function and develop mitochondria-targeted therapy.

Availability of data and materials

CIBMTR supports accessibility of research in accord with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Data Sharing Policy and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Moonshot Public Access and Data Sharing Policy. The CIBMTR only releases de-identified datasets that comply with all relevant global regulations regarding privacy and confidentiality.

Abbreviations

allo-HCT:

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

MDS:

Myelodysplastic syndromes

mtDNA:

Mitochondrial DNA

WGS:

Whole-genome sequencing

CIBMTR:

Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

OS:

Overall survival

RFS:

Relapse-free survival

TRM:

Transplant-related mortality

KPS:

Karnofsky Performance Score

IPSS:

International Prognostic Scoring System

IPSS-R:

Revised International Prognostic Scoring System

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

OXPHOS:

Oxidative phosphorylation

tRNA:

Transfer RNA

rRNA:

Ribosomal RNA

ETC:

Electron transport chain

HF:

Heteroplasmic fraction

AF:

Allele frequency

SKAT-O:

Sequence kernel association test

References

  1. Cazzola M. Myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(14):1358–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindsley RC, Saber W, Mar BG, Redd R, Wang T, Haagenson MD, et al. Prognostic mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome after stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(6):536–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Filippi MD, Ghaffari S. Mitochondria in the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells: new perspectives and opportunities. Blood. 2019;133(18):1943–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormick EM, Lott MT, Dulik MC, Shen L, Attimonelli M, Vitale O, et al. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP standards and guidelines for mitochondrial DNA variant interpretation. Hum Mutat. 2020;41(12):2028–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta M, Madkaikar M, Rao VB, Mishra A, Govindaraj P, Thangaraj K, et al. Mitochondrial DNA variations in myelodysplastic syndrome. Ann Hematol. 2013;92(7):871–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martinez-Reyes I, Cardona LR, Kong H, Vasan K, McElroy GS, Werner M, et al. Mitochondrial ubiquinol oxidation is necessary for tumour growth. Nature. 2020;585(7824):288–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vyas S, Zaganjor E, Haigis MC. Mitochondria and cancer. Cell. 2016;166(3):555–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ross JA, Tolar J, Spector LG, DeFor T, Lund TC, Weisdorf DJ, et al. An exploratory analysis of mitochondrial haplotypes and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(1):81–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernard E, Tuechler H, Greenberg Peter L, Hasserjian Robert P, Arango Ossa Juan E, Nannya Y, et al. molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(7):EVIDoa200008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Della Porta MG, Galli A, Bacigalupo A, Zibellini S, Bernardi M, Rizzo E, et al. Clinical effects of driver somatic mutations on the outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(30):3627–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nazha A, Hu ZH, Wang T, Lindsley RC, Abdel-Azim H, Aljurf M, et al. A personalized prediction model for outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26(11):2139–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all participants in the CIBMTR.

Funding

Jing Dong is supported by the Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center. N00014-17-1-2850 from the Office of Naval Research. The CIBMTR is supported primarily by Public Health Service U24CA076518 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); HHSH250201700006C from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA); and N00014-20-1-2832 and N00014-21-1-2954 from the Office of Naval Research; Support is also provided by Be the Match Foundation, the Medical College of Wisconsin, the National Marrow Donor Program, and from the following commercial entities: AbbVie; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Adaptimmune; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation; ADC Therapeutics; Adienne SA; Allogene; Allovir, Inc.; Amgen, Inc.; Angiocrine; Anthem; Astellas Pharma US; AstraZeneca; Atara Biotherapeutics; BeiGene; bluebird bio, inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb Co.; CareDx Inc.; CRISPR; CSL Behring; CytoSen Therapeutics, Inc.; Eurofins Viracor, DBA Eurofins Transplant Diagnostics; Gamida-Cell, Ltd.; Gilead; GlaxoSmithKline; HistoGenetics; Incyte Corporation; Iovance; Janssen Research & Development, LLC; Janssen/Johnson & Johnson; Jasper Therapeutics; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Kadmon, a Sanofi Company; Karius; Kiadis Pharma; Kite, a Gilead Company; Kyowa Kirin; Legend Biotech; Magenta Therapeutics; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals; Medac GmbH; Medexus Pharma; Merck & Co.; Mesoblast; Millennium, the Takeda Oncology Co.; Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.; MorphoSys; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Omeros Corporation; OptumHealth; Orca Biosystems, Inc.; Ossium Health, Inc.; Pfizer, Inc.; Pharmacyclics, LLC, An AbbVie Company; Pluristem; PPD Development, LP; Sanofi; Sobi, Inc.; Stemcyte; Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Talaris Therapeutics; Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies; TG Therapeutics; Vertex Pharmaceuticals; Vor Biopharma Inc.; Xenikos BV.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JD, and WS conceived the study and oversaw the project; JD, TZ, SS, YB, PA, and WS study provided study materials or patients; JD, CB, TZ, SS, YB, PA, and WS collected and assembled the data; JD, CB, PA, and WS analyzed and interpreted data; JD, CB, TZ, SS, YB, AD, SG, HD, AN, CC, CC, RU, PA, and WS wrote and revised and manuscript; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jing Dong or Wael Saber.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of CIBMTR and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Dr. DeZern reports payment or honoraria from Taiho for Myeloid teaching and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Geron, Novartis, Gilead, BMS – all for novel therapeutics and not relevant to this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary Figures.

Additional file 2.

Supplementary Tables.

Additional file 3.

Supplementary Methods.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, J., Buradagunta, C.S., Zhang, T. et al. Prognostic landscape of mitochondrial genome in myelodysplastic syndrome after stem-cell transplantation. J Hematol Oncol 16, 21 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-023-01418-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-023-01418-4

Keywords