Open Access

Acute graft versus host disease after orthotopic liver transplantation

Journal of Hematology & Oncology20125:50

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-5-50

Received: 5 June 2012

Accepted: 27 July 2012

Published: 13 August 2012

Abstract

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is an uncommon complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with an incidence of 0.1–2%, but an 80–100% mortality rate. Patients can present with skin rashes, diarrhea, and bone marrow aplasia between two to eight weeks after OLT. Diagnosis of GVHD is made based on clinical and histologic evidence, supported by chimerism studies showing donor HLA alleles in the recipient bone marrow or blood. Several therapeutic approaches have been used for the management of GVHD after OLT including increased immunosuppression, decreased immunosuppression, and cellular therapies. However, success rates have been low, and new approaches are needed.

Introduction

The first successful human orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) was performed in 1967 by a surgical team led by Dr. Thomas Starzl in Denver, Colorado. Today more than 6000 liver transplants are performed each year in the United States with a one year survival rate of 80–85% [1].

Acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), a frequent complication after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), occurs infrequently after solid organ transplantation [2]. However, GVHD has been reported following blood transfusions [3], and any procedure that transfers viable allogeneic lymphocytes into another individual carries the potential risk of inducing GVHD. Thus, among solid organ transplants GVHD is more likely in recipients of liver or intestinal transplants where the transplanted organs contain high numbers of donor lymphocytes [2]. After OLT the incidence of GVHD has been estimated at 0.1–2%, but the mortality rate is 80–100% [4, 5]. Those estimates are derived from single institution studies; the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in the United States does not routinely collect information about GVHD, and the absence of registry studies from other parts of the world suggests that this complication is not routinely captured in databases. Generally the same treatment principles are applied as with GVHD after HCT. However, the likelihood of success is low, and new approaches are needed.

Case presentation

A 53-year-old woman had a 14 year history of primary biliary cirrhosis and received a liver transplant from a cadaveric male donor. Transplantation was uncomplicated and she received 3 doses of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction peritransplant. Post-transplant immunosuppression was with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. She was discharged from the hospital on post-operative day (POD) 14. Prednisone 5 mg daily was added on POD 20 for additional immunosuppression. On POD 38 she was readmitted with tremors, forgetfulness, headache and difficulty with word finding. Her absolute neutrophil count was 0.09 × 109/L. A bone marrow biopsy showed a markedly hypocellular marrow with no evidence of dysplasia. Flow cytometry showed less than 0.1% CD34 positive progenitors consistent with severe myelosuppression. Bone marrow chimerism studies showed 80% liver donor and 20% host cells. Cytogenetic analysis was limited to one metaphase, which showed a 46 XY karyotype, consistent with male donor origin. Due to the pancytopenia and documented donor chimerism, the working diagnosis was GVHD restricted to the bone marrow. She had no nausea, diarrhea or skin rash suggestive of gastrointestinal or skin GVHD, and liver GVHD would not be expected given the OLT. She was treated with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) 1.5 mg per kg for three consecutive days and alefacept 30 mg per dose, twice weekly for three doses. Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone were discontinued. HLA-typing of her two siblings was initiated.

Follow-up bone marrow biopsy 12 days after administration of ATG showed continued aplasia with < 0.1% CD34+ cells. Bone marrow chimerism was 27% donor and 73% host, while unsorted peripheral blood chimerism showed 98% donor and 2% host cells. No further bone marrow studies were done.

On POD 53 after OLT and day 7 after starting ATG, she developed an erythematous, pruritic and painful skin rash, most prominent on her hands but also extensively involving her back, arms and legs. Skin biopsy was consistent with GVHD, and chimerism studies showed male (donor) lymphocytes in the biopsy specimen. She was treated with topical steroids for these lesions given the high risk of infection and the fact that the lesions were not progressing.

Her subsequent clinical course was complicated by prolonged vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia, which was treated with multiple antibiotics and granulocyte transfusions. Weekly rituximab was administered for EBV viremia and abdominal CT showing retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, suggestive of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Liver function tests were normal throughout her course. HLA-typing showed that the liver donor shared a single DQB1 antigen with the patient, but the donor was heterozygous at all loci. Thus, the HLA typing of donor and patient would not have predicted a high risk for graft-versus-host disease.

Due to the profound bone marrow failure, the plan was to proceed with allogeneic HCT. However, the patient’s clinical condition deteriorated rapidly, and she died POD 86 from septicemia, pulmonary aspergillosis and respiratory distress syndrome before a donor was identified.

The spectrum of clinical presentation

In 1988, Burdick and colleagues first described acute GVHD after OLT, and more than 80 cases have been reported since then [6]. Graft-versus-host disease after OLT usually presents at two to eight weeks postoperatively with bone marrow aplasia, skin rash and diarrhea. Liver function is not affected because the transplanted liver lacks host antigen. The diagnosis may be delayed, because similar presentations can be seen with drug reactions and bacterial or viral infections. One of the earliest clinical presentations is an erythematous maculopapular skin rash. Detection of donor lymphocytes in skin and a nonspecific lichenoid reaction pattern with basal vacuolar changes, dyskeratosis and apoptotic cells in the epidermis may be seen [7]. Donor cells are located at the dermoepidermal junction and migrate upward into the epidermis; FISH for the Y chromosome may confirm donor cells when donor and recipient are sex mismatched [8, 9].

Diarrhea is most commonly the result of absorptive function loss caused by lymphocyte infiltration and destruction of the intestinal mucosa, and is more evident as the post-transplant period lengthens. Biopsy specimens of gastric, duodenal or colonic mucosa demonstrate apoptosis and infiltration by donor lymphocytes [10]. In case of pancytopenia, and suspected GVHD restricted to the bone marrow, a bone marrow analysis usually shows a markedly hypocellular marrow with no evidence of dysplasia. Flow cytometry is consistent with severe myelosuppression. Bone marrow chimerism studies show a high percentage of liver donor and significantly less host cells. Cytogenetic analysis is consistent with donor karyotype. Most patients die from infections, bone marrow failure, gastrointestinal bleeding or multiorgan failure. As with transfusion-associated GVHD, the high mortality rate after OLT may explain why no clearly documented cases of chronic GVHD have been reported.

Pathophysiology and diagnosis of GVHD

In OLT, about 109–1010 donor-derived leukocytes including monocytes, T-cells and natural killer cells are transplanted with the liver allograft [11], approximately the same number as with a standard peripheral blood stem cell infusion. This infusion of immunocompetent cells and pluripotent progenitors, in conjunction with the immunosuppression used for the liver transplant, resembles the circumstances of an immunosuppressed patient receiving a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In fact, donor lymphocytes can be routinely found within three weeks and even up to 100 days after OLT in the peripheral blood and bone marrow [12, 13], and detectable chimerism is associated with a decreased risk of liver rejection. In most cases, over time the immune system of the patient rejects the donor’s lymphocytes and full host chimerism is re-established. Lymphocyte populations in the donor liver are distinct from those in peripheral blood with a reversed ratio of CD4:CD8 among hepatic lymphocytes and a higher proportion of CD8+ cells and B lymphocytes [14]. Lymphocytes transferred with the donor’s liver may induce severe pancytopenia by attacking and destroying the recipient’s hematopoietic stem cells. Donor stem cells with pluripotent function can migrate from the liver to the recipient’s bone marrow, spleen, lymph nodes and lungs and give rise to mature donor cells of several hematopoietic lineages [15]. However, the number of hematopoietic stem cells transplanted with the donor liver is not sufficient and the degree of HLA mismatching is too great to allow engraftment and reconstitution of the myeloid and erythroid lineages. Recipients with GVHD can experience symptoms of upper and lower gastrointestinal involvement with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, and skin involvement with maculo-papular rashes and erythema. These clinical signs and symptoms are identical to what is seen in primary hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Engraftment of donor lymphocytes can be confirmed by chimerism studies and identification of donor HLA alleles in the recipient bone marrow or blood using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test [16]. A DNA sample from the liver donor is required to confirm the source of allogeneic cells. By convention the diagnosis of donor engraftment is confirmed if the donor T-cell level is >1% of T-cells detected. Persistently elevated levels of donor CD8 + T/NK cells in the periphery (>10%) may be indicative of GVHD. The level of donor CD8+ T and NK cells may correlate with the severity of GVHD manifestations [17]. Early recognition and expeditious treatment for GVHD is important to control the immune reaction before it is too established and extensive organ damage has occurred.

Domiati-Saad and colleagues reported serial single tandem repeat results in 49 patients during the first two months after OLT. In 38 of the 49 patients, donor T cell chimerism was present on POD 2, and remained positive by the end of the first week in 23 patients. Donor CD8+ T-cell chimerism was less than CD3+ T cell chimerism measured on the same sample, but in the two patients with acute GVHD the level of CD8+ T-cell chimerism was generally equal to or greater than the CD3+ T-cell chimerism. These two patients had characteristic signs of acute GVHD. Donor CD3+ fractions above 10–20% of lymphocytes correlated strongly with acute GVHD [18].

Risk factors for GVHD

Shared HLA antigens between donor and recipient are the most important risk factors for the induction of GVHD. Use of an HLA-homozygous donor, resulting in one way HLA matching in the GVHD direction, significantly increases the risk of developing GVHD after OLT [19].

Kamei and colleagues investigated the incidence of fatal GVHD following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in a retrospective study of 906 donor-recipient pairs. They analyzed the ages of the recipient and donor, donor relationship, original disease, initial symptoms, onset and course of GVHD, Glucksberg stage, and donor/recipient HLA type. Eight cases (1%) of fatal GVHD after LDLT were identified with skin rash as the most common initial manifestation. Seven cases had unidirectional HLA matching at 3 loci (HLA-A, -B and –DR) in the GVHD direction (donor homozygous). Case 8 had unidirectional HLA matching at 2 loci (HLA-A and –DR) in the GVHD direction with the B locus matched because of recipient homozygocity. Among these 8 cases, four donors were children, three were parents and one was a sibling. The authors suggested that the risk of fatal GVHD following LDLT may depend on the number of loci with donor-dominant one-way HLA matching, and was highest with mismatching in the GVHD direction at all 3 loci (HLA-A, -B and –DR) [20].

Key and colleagues reported a single-center analysis of 412 consecutive adult OLT recipients where HLA typing data were available. Their data showed that HLA matching at HLA-B, but not HLA-A or –DR was a significant risk factor for the development of GVHD. Of 14 donor-recipient pairs matched at HLA-B, three (21%) developed GVHD [21].

Chan and colleagues studied 205 OLT patients surviving more than 30 days. Four patients (2%) developed GVHD, and three of them had received a donor liver with steatosis graded mild or more severe. This analysis did not identify HLA-matching as a risk factor for GVHD, and could not confirm cryptogenic cirrhosis (as an indication for liver transplantation) or older recipient age (>40 yrs) to be predictors of GVHD. Alcoholic liver disease, particularly in combination with hepatocellular carcinoma and glucose intolerance, conferred a very high risk for GVHD. They concluded that immunodeficient states due to diabetes mellitus type I and II, various autoimmune diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma increased the risk for developing GVHD [22]. Infection with CMV and HSV viruses can depress immunocompetence and increase the risk for GVHD after OLT [23].

Although GVHD after OLT usually appears two to eight weeks after OLT, similar to what is seen in hematopoietic cell transplantation, Pollack et al reported a case of a 52-year-old liver transplant recipient who developed gastrointestinal symptoms and severe aplasia 8 months after OLT. After elimination of all other possible causes of these symptoms, chimerism analysis was performed and showed that 96% of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells were of liver-donor origin. An allogeneic peripheral blood HCT was carried out, but the patient died of septicemia 5 days after transplantation [24]. Severe aplastic anemia is a known late complication after liver transplantation, sometimes occurring years after the transplant [2529]. Since chimerism studies were not performed in the majority of these cases, it is possible that GVHD could have been a contributing factor.

Treatment

Several therapeutic approaches have been proposed in the literature. One strategy has been to decrease immunosuppression, in an effort to shift the balance in favor of recipient immunity, but most investigators have tried to increase immunosuppression.

The literature describes cases where patients were treated with corticosteroids as monotherapy because of their well-known ability to induce apoptosis in lymphocytes and profound anti-inflammatory effect. However, high doses of corticosteroids did not seem to improve response rates and may increase the risk for these patients to die of complications of GVHD, infection and multi-organ failure due to side effects of high doses of corticosteroids.

Treatment with immunosuppression beyond steroids has been very heterogeneous and has included antimetabolites, alkylating agents, anti-T cell antibodies, anti-B cell antibodies, intravenous immunoglobulin, cytokine inhibitors, immunostimulants and cellular therapy, including T cell infusions and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The literature may reflect heavy publication bias, where successful cases are reported, but unsuccessful treatment attempts are not. In cases of GVHD-associated marrow failure, standard treatments for GVHD have not been successful.

The Table 1 summarizes the treatment approaches that have been published, but outcome data are not provided, because many immunosuppressants were used in combination, and no clear pattern of success or failure emerged from reviewing the cases.
Table 1

Approaches used in the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease following orthotopic liver transplantation

Most common treatments

Corticosteroids (most), calcineurin inhibitors (many), granulocyte colony stimulating factors (many)

Antimetabolites

Azathioprine [30]

Alkylating agents

Cyclophosphamide [24]

Anti-T cell antibodies

Anti-thymocyte globulin [5, 19, 24, 3145]

 

OKT3 [24, 42]

 

Campath [38, 46, 47]

 

Alefacept [43]

Anti-B cell antibodies

Rituximab [46, 48]

Immunoglobulin

Immunoglobulin [4, 49, 50]

Cytokine inhibitors

Infliximab (TNF) [3, 31]

 

Etanercept (TNF) [51]

 

Daclizumab (IL2R) [3, 38, 41, 46, 5254]

 

Basiliximab (IL2R) [5, 39, 44, 47, 48, 55, 56]

Immunostimulants

Thymosin alpha 1 [4, 41]

Cellular therapy

Ex vivo T cell expansion [47]

 

Hematopoietic cell transplantation [24, 32, 34]

Anti-T cell antibodies have shown some success in treating corticosteroid resistant GVHD, but are associated with an increased risk for development of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease and viral reactivation. Weekly monitoring by PCR for CMV and EBV reactivation is recommended after starting antilymphocyte therapy.

The second most common approach is to administer cytokine inhibitors, most commonly against IL2 and TNF-α. Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies daclizumab and basiliximab have shown some benefits if introduced early after high-dose corticosteroids. Infliximab is a chimeric mouse/human immunoglobulin-G antibody directed against soluble and transmembrane forms of human TNF-α. Some authors suggest that infliximab should be introduced earlier after the diagnosis of steroid refractory acute GVHD, and if possible, before ATG to avoid increased risks of infection and subsequent lymphoproliferative disorders [31]. Etanercept, a soluble TNF-receptor, has been used successfully at the standard dose of 25 mg twice a week for 8 weeks, although treatment was complicated by invasive Aspergillus infection. The authors recommended antifungal prophylaxis when etanercept is used in acute GVHD because of its significant rate of serious fungal complications [51]. The experience with HCT in cases of OLT-associated GVHD is very limited.

There is one report of a haploidentical transplant for GVHD-associated pancytopenia, with documented transient engraftment of the haploidentical donor cells followed by rejection of the donor graft and recovery of recipient hematopoiesis. The haploidentical donor was related to the recipient (family member) and different from the liver donor [32].

Another report showed successful harvest and ex vivo expansion of recipient T cells, which upon re-infusion were successful in combating GVHD [57]. Thus, allogeneic HCT could be a treatment for OLT-associated GVHD, although the choice of conditioning regimens is difficult in this complicated patient population. Although the risk of GVHD after OLT is low, the high morbidity and mortality of this complication demand efforts to prevent it. Minimizing immunosuppression of the recipient or decreasing the lymphocyte burden in the donor liver might prevent GVHD but increase the rate of liver graft rejection [58]. Depletion of T-lymphocytes from the liver before transplantation could be achieved by treating the cadaveric donor with ATG, but eliminating lymphocytes from the liver may have an adverse effect on graft survival. Stable high donor chimerism has been associated with tolerance to the donor liver [46, 59]. Some patients have been able to stop all immunosuppression after OLT; hematopoietic chimerism was not tested in this study but would be interesting to investigate [60]. Avoidance of donors homozygous at HLA loci shared with a patient would lower the risk of GVHD, but this information is not typically available in a timely fashion when the orthotopic liver is being allocated. Avoidance of peritransplant T cell depleting antibodies would help lower GVHD, but might also increase the rate of liver rejection. Conversely, increasing immunosuppression to try to prevent GVHD or introducing agents more commonly used for GVHD prophylaxis in hematopoietic cell transplantation, such as methotrexate, just to prevent a complication seen in <2% of the population may not be warranted, and could actually increase the rate of GVHD if host immunity is more suppressed than donor immunity.

It is clear that more successful approaches to treating OLT GVHD need to be developed. Such advances will require a coordinated effort among transplant centers to systematically test potential treatment algorithms given the rarity of this complication.

Summary

GVHD after OLT is a rare problem, but one associated with a greater than 80% mortality. Rapid diagnosis, immunosuppressive treatment, and aggressive supportive care are key to potentially reversing this otherwise fatal condition. Our patient presented with symptoms five weeks after OLT, which is similar to previously reported cases. In cases of pancytopenia due to GVHD, rapid evaluation for possible HCT may offer the best option for survival. In conclusion, the diagnosis and treatment of GVHD after solid organ transplantation is difficult because the early symptoms are nonspecific, and no standard treatment is available. Reducing the risk factors for development of GVHD, identifying the disease promptly, preventing infection, and starting treatment as early as possible may improve the dismal outcome associated with this disease. It would be helpful to report cases to registries and world data banks that collect data from organ transplant centers in order to better understand this complication and allow for the design and testing of treatments to try to improve survival.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

Supported by grant CA 118953 NIH/NCI.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Zagreb School of Medicine, University Hospital Merkur
(2)
Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington

References

  1. Jain A, Reyes J, Kashyap R: Long-term survival after liver transplantation in 4,000 consecutive patients at a single center. Ann Surg. 2000, 232 (4): 490-10.1097/00000658-200010000-00004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wu G, Selvaggi G, Nishida S: Graft-versus-host disease after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. Transplantation. 2011, 91 (2): 219-10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ff86ec.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schroeder ML: Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease. Brit J Hematol. 2002, 117: 275-10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03450.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen XB, Yang J, Xu MQ, Wen TF, Yan LN: Unsuccessful treatment of four patients with acute graft-vs-host disease after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2012, 18 (1): 84-10.3748/wjg.v18.i1.84.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Perri R, Assi M, Talwalkar J: Graft vs. host disease after liver transplantation: a new approach is needed. Liver Transpl. 2007, 13 (8): 1092-10.1002/lt.21203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Burdick JF, Vogelsang GB, Smith WJ: Severe graft-versus-host disease in a liver transplant recipient. N Engl J Med. 1988, 318 (11): 689-10.1056/NEJM198803173181107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Moody MN, Kazakevich N, Smith JR: Sweat the small stuff: the importance of clinicalpathologic correlation in cutaneous GVHD following orthotopic liver transplant. Arch Dermatol. 2011, 147 (11): 1345-10.1001/archdermatol.2011.331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Nguyen J, Tetzlaff MT, Zhang PJ, Xu X, Hexner E, Rosenbach M: Fluorescent in situ hybridization of a skin biopsy: an adjunctive tool to support a diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011, 64 (6): e113-10.1016/j.jaad.2010.09.716.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Post GR, Black JS, Cortes GY, Pollack RB, Wolff DJ, Lazarchick J: The utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis in diagnosing graft versus host disease following orthotopic liver transplant. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2011, 41 (2): 188-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Meves A, el-Azhary RA, Talwalkar JA: Acute graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation diagnosed by fluorescent in situ hybridization testing of skin biopsy specimens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006, 55 (4): 642-10.1016/j.jaad.2006.04.073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schlitt HJ, Raddatz G, Steinhoff G, Wonigeit K, Pichlmayr R: Passenger lymphocytes in human liver allografts and their potential role after transplantation. Transplantation. 1993, 56 (4): 951-10.1097/00007890-199310000-00033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schoniger-Hekele M, Muller C, Kramer L: Graft versus host disease after orthotopic liver transplantation documented by analysis of short tandem repeat polymorphisms. Digestion. 2006, 74 (3–4): 169-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Stachel D, Schmid I, Lang T, Haas RJ, Otte JB: Double bone marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anemia after orthotopic liver transplantation: implications for clinical management and immune tolerance. Transpl Int. 2002, 15 (1): 39-10.1111/j.1432-2277.2002.tb00096.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Norris S, Collins C, Doherty DG: Resident human hepatic lymphocytes are phenotypically different from circulating lymphocytes. J Hepatol. 1998, 28 (1): 84-10.1016/S0168-8278(98)80206-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins RH, Anastasi J, Terstappen LW: Brief report: donor-derived long-term multilineage hematopoiesis in a liver-transplant recipient. N Engl J Med. 1993, 328 (11): 762-10.1056/NEJM199303183281104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Taylor AL, Gibbs P, Sudhindran S: Monitoring systemic donor lymphocyte macrochimerism to aid the diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2004, 77 (3): 441-10.1097/01.TP.0000103721.29729.FE.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hahn AB, Baliga P: Rapid method for the analysis of peripheral chimerism in suspected graftversus-host disease after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2000, 6 (2): 180-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Domiati-Saad R, Klintmalm GB, Netto G, Agura ED, Chinnakotla S, Smith DM: Acute graft versus host disease after liver transplantation: patterns of lymphocyte chimerism. Am J Transplant. 2005, 5 (12): 2968-10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01110.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Soejima Y, Shimada M, Suehiro T: Graft-versus-host disease following living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2004, 10 (3): 460-10.1002/lt.20101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamei H, Oike F, Fujimoto Y, Yamamoto H, Tanaka K, Kiuchi T: Fatal graft-versus-host disease after living donor liver transplantation: differential impact of donor-dominant one-way HLA matching. Liver Transpl. 2006, 12 (1): 140-10.1002/lt.20573.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Key T, Taylor CJ, Bradley JA, Taylor AL: Recipients who receive a human leukocyte antigen-B compatible cadaveric liver allograft are at high risk of developing acute graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation. 2004, 78 (12): 1809-10.1097/01.TP.0000145523.08548.48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chan EY, Larson AM, Gernsheimer TB: Recipient and donor factors influence the incidence of graft-vs.-host disease in liver transplant patients. Liver Transpl. 2007, 13 (4): 516-10.1002/lt.21082.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Heaton ND, Reece AS, Tan KC: Graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation. J R Soc Med. 1992, 85 (6): 313-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pollack MS, Speeg KV, Callander NS: Severe, late-onset graft-versus-host disease in a liver transplant recipient documented by chimerism analysis. Hum Immunol. 2005, 66 (1): 28-10.1016/j.humimm.2004.09.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagglund H, Winiarski J, Ringden O, Sparrelid E, Ericzon BG: Successful allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in a 2.5-year-old boy with ongoing cytomegalovirus viremia and severe aplastic anemia after orthotopic liver transplantation for non-A, non-B, non-C hepatitis. Transplantation. 1997, 64 (8): 1207-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawahara K, Storb R, Sanders J, Petersen FB: Successful allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in a 6.5-year-old male for severe aplastic anemia complicating orthotopic liver transplantation for fulminant non-A-non-B hepatitis. Blood. 1991, 78 (4): 1140-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Perkins JL, Neglia JP, Ramsay NK, Davies SM: Successful bone marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anemia following orthotopic liver transplantation: long-term follow-up and outcome. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001, 28 (5): 523-10.1038/sj.bmt.1703177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Trede NS, Warwick AB, Rosoff PM, Rohrer R, Bierer BE, Guinan E: Tacrolimus (FK506) in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anemia following orthotopic liver transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997, 20 (3): 257-10.1038/sj.bmt.1700872.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Yoshimi A, Nannya Y, Ueda K: Successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling in a patient with aplastic anemia after HLA-haploidentical living related liver transplantation for fulminant hepatitis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009, 15 (3): 389-10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.11.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmuth M, Vogel W, Weinlich G, Margreiter R, Fritsch P, Sepp N: Cutaneous lesions as the presenting sign of acute graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation. Br J Dermatol. 1999, 141 (5): 901-10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03166.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Piton G, Larosa F, Minello A: Infliximab treatment for steroid-refractory acute graftversus-host disease after orthotopic liver transplantation: a case report. Liver Transpl. 2009, 15 (7): 682-10.1002/lt.21793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kriss M, Feliciano J, Fryer J, Mehta J, Levitsky J: Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation. Blood. 2011, 118 (12): 3448-10.1182/blood-2011-05-353714.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wisecarver JL, Cattral MS, Langnas AN: Transfusion-induced graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation. Documentation using polymerase chain reaction with HLA-DR sequence-specific primers. Transplantation. 1994, 58 (3): 269-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Au WY, Ma SK, Kwong YL: Graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation: documentation by fluorescent in situ hybridisation and human leucocyte antigen typing. Clin Transplant. 2000, 14 (2): 174-10.1034/j.1399-0012.2000.140213.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith DM, Agura E, Netto G: Liver transplant-associated graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation. 2003, 75 (1): 118-10.1097/00007890-200301150-00022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Aziz H, Trigo P, Lendoire J: Successful treatment of graft-vs-host disease after a second liver transplant. Transplant Proc. 1998, 30 (6): 2891-10.1016/S0041-1345(98)00857-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lehner F, Becker T, Sybrecht L: Successful outcome of acute graft-versus-host disease in a liver allograft recipient by withdrawal of immunosuppression. Transplantation. 2002, 73 (2): 307-10.1097/00007890-200201270-00030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Schappi MG, Belli DC, Rimensberger PC: Fatal GvHD as a complication of liver transplantation for undetermined fulminant hepatic failure and associated aplastic anemia. Liver Transpl. 2006, 12 (11): 1693-10.1002/lt.20916.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ghali MP, Talwalkar JA, Moore SB, Hogan WJ, Menon KV, Rosen CB: Acute graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2007, 83 (3): 365-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Chinnakotla S, Smith DM, Domiati-Saad R: Acute graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation: role of withdrawal of immunosuppression in therapeutic management. Liver Transpl. 2007, 13 (1): 157-10.1002/lt.20982.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lu Y, Wu LQ, Zhang BY, Cao JY: Graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation: successful treatment of a case. Transplant Proc. 2008, 40 (10): 3784-10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kohler S, Pascher A, Junge G: Graft versus host disease after liver transplantation - a single center experience and review of literature. Transpl Int. 2008, 21 (5): 441-10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00625.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Stotler CJ, Eghtesad B, Hsi E, Silver B: Rapid resolution of GVHD after orthotopic liver transplantation in a patient treated with alefacept. Blood. 2009, 113 (21): 5365-10.1182/blood-2009-02-207431.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yuksekkaya HA, Arikan C, Tumgor G, Aksoylar S, Kilic M, Aydogdu S: Late-onset graft-versus host disease after pediatric living-related liver transplantation for Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Transplant. 2011, 15 (6): E105-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Shimizu T, Hayashi M, Inoue Y: Acute graft-versus-host disease after living donor liver transplantation with donor-dominant one-way human leukocyte antigen matching at two Loci. Transplantation. 2010, 89 (9): 1164-10.1097/TP.0b013e3181cea646.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Alexander SI, Smith N, Hu M: Chimerism and tolerance in a recipient of a deceased donor liver transplant. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358 (4): 369-10.1056/NEJMoa0707255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kuball J, Theobald M, Ferreira EA: Control of organ transplant-associated graft-versushost disease by activated host lymphocyte infusions. Transplantation. 2004, 78 (12): 1774-10.1097/01.TP.0000144183.77279.EC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Young AL, Leboeuf NR, Tsiouris SJ, Husain S, Grossman ME: Fatal disseminated Acanthamoeba infection in a liver transplant recipient immunocompromised by combination therapies for graft-versus-host disease. Transpl Infect Dis. 2010, 12 (6): 529-10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00535.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Mawad R, Hsieh A, Damon L: Graft-versus-host disease presenting with pancytopenia after en bloc multiorgan transplantation: case report and literature review. Transplant Proc. 2009, 41 (10): 4431-10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Romagnuolo J, Jewell LD, Kneteman NM, Bain VG: Graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation complicated by systemic aspergillosis with pancarditis. Can J Gastroenterol. 2000, 14 (7): 637-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Thin L, Macquillan G, Adams L: Acute graft-versus-host disease after liver transplant: novel use of etanercept and the role of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors. Liver Transpl. 2009, 15 (4): 421-10.1002/lt.21704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Guo ZY, He XS, Wu LW: Graft-verse-host disease after liver transplantation: a report of two cases and review of literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2008, 14 (6): 974-10.3748/wjg.14.974.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rinon M, Maruri N, Arrieta A, Fernandez JR, Ortiz de Urbina J, Garcia Masdevall MD: Selective immunosuppression with daclizumab in liver transplantation with graft-versus-host disease. Transplant Proc. 2002, 34 (1): 109-10.1016/S0041-1345(01)02828-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang B, Lu Y, Yu L, Liu C, Wu Z, Liu X: Diagnosis and treatment for graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation: two case reports. Transplant Proc. 2007, 39 (5): 1696-10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.02.078.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Yashar S, Wu SS, Binder SW, Cotliar J: Acute graft-versus-host disease after pediatric solid organ transplant. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008, 7 (5): 467-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sudhindran S, Taylor A, Delriviere L: Treatment of graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation with basiliximab followed by bowel resection. Am J Transplant. 2003, 3 (8): 1024-10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00108.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Whalen JG, Jukic DM, English JC: Rash and pancytopenia as initial manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005, 52 (5): 908-10.1016/j.jaad.2005.01.126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Collins RH, Cooper B, Nikaein A, Klintmalm G, Fay JW: Graft-versus-host disease in a liver transplant recipient. Ann Intern Med. 1992, 116 (5): 391-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Ayala R, Grande S, Albizua E: Long-term follow-up of donor chimerism and tolerance after human liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2009, 15 (6): 581-10.1002/lt.21736.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Feng S, Ekong UD, Lobritto SJ: Complete immunosuppression withdrawal and subsequent allograft function among pediatric recipients of parental living donor liver transplants. JAMA. 2012, 307 (3): 283-10.1001/jama.2011.2014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rogulj et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.