Open Access

The role of telomeres and telomerase in hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

  • Limengmeng Wang1,
  • Haowen Xiao1, 2,
  • Xing Zhang1,
  • Chong Wang3 and
  • He Huang1Email author
Journal of Hematology & Oncology20147:61

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-014-0061-9

Received: 10 June 2014

Accepted: 6 August 2014

Published: 20 August 2014

Abstract

Telomeres are specific nucleoprotein structures at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes. Telomeres and telomere-associated proteins maintain genome stability by protecting the ends of chromosomes from fusion and degradation. In normal somatic cells, the length of the telomeres gradually becomes shortened with cell division. In tumor cells, the shortening of telomeres length is accelerated under the increased proliferation pressure. However, it will be maintained at an extremely short length as the result of activation of telomerase. Significantly shortened telomeres, activation of telomerase, and altered expression of telomere-associated proteins are common features of various hematologic malignancies and are related with progression or chemotherapy resistance in these diseases. In patients who have received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the telomere length and the telomerase activity of the engrafted donor cells have a significant influence on HSCT outcomes. Transplantation-related factors should be taken into consideration because of their impacts on telomere homeostasis. As activation of telomerase is widespread in tumor cells, it has been employed as a target point in the treatment of neoplastic hematologic disorders. In this review, the characteristics and roles of telomeres and telomerase both in hematologic malignancies and in HSCT will be summarized. The current status of telomerase-targeted therapies utilized in the treatment of hematologic malignancies will also be reviewed.

Keywords

Telomere Telomerase Shelterin Hematologic malignancies Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Target therapy

Introduction

The telomeres are specific nucleoprotein structures at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes which maintain genome stability by protecting chromosomes from end fusion and degradation. Human telomeres are composed of 10–15 kb of 5′-TTAGGG-3′ DNA sequence repeats and a telomere-associated protein complex, shelterin (reviewed by Blackburn) [1]. The end of each telomere consists of a t-loop structure formed by strand invasion of the 3′ single strand overhang into the double-stranded telomeric DNA and then stabilized by shelterin [2].

In most somatic cells, telomeres gradually become shortened (20–59 bp/year) because of the end-replication problem during cell division [3],[4]. Once its length reaches a critical limitation, the telomere is unable to assemble the t-loop structure and the chromosome becomes uncapped. At this point the DNA damage response and replicative senescence will be triggered through the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated gene (ATM) or the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 (ATR) -related checkpoint pathway [5]. However, cells in which cell cycle checkpoint proteins have been inactivated are able to continue division and continue losing telomeric sequences until they reach a crisis stage in which p53-dependent apoptosis is triggered. Cancer cells have to go through the crisis stage to maintain their telomeres and achieve immortality. In the majority of cancer cells (80% to 90%), telomerase has been activated to maintain telomere length [6], while a subset of cancer cells elongate telomeres through telomerase-independent mechanisms named alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) [7].

Telomerase is a reverse transcriptase which maintains telomere length by adding nucleotides to the single-stranded (ss) DNA of the telomere during cell division [8]. Telomerase consists of a protein component (hTERT) and an RNA template component (hTERC). hTERT is the catalytic subunit of telomerase which limits its reverse transcriptase activity. hTERC consists of an 11 nucleotide sequence (5′-CUAACCCUAAC-3′) which is complementary to the telomere sequence (TTAGGG)n [9]. Telomerase is recruited to the telomere via its interaction with shelterin.

Shelterin is a protein complex which consists of 6 telomere-associated proteins: telomeric repeat-binding factors 1 and 2 (TRF1 and TRF2), TRF1-interacting nuclear factor 2 (TIN2), protection of telomeres (POT1), POT1 and TIN2-interacting protein 1 (TPP1), and TRF2-interacting protein 1 (Rap1) (Figure 1). Shelterin protects the telomere from being recognized as a double-strand break in the DNA sequence which would lead to activation of the DNA damage response and repair process (reviewed by de Lange) [10]. Shelterin is anchored to the chromosomal end by the double-strand (ds) DNA binding proteins TRF1 and TRF2, the ss DNA binding protein POT1, and Rap1 which binds DNA at the ds-ss junction of the telomere [11]. TRF1 and TRF2 bind TIN2 simultaneously to form two separate complexes [12],[13]. The binding between TRF1/TRF2 and TIN2 protects TRF1/TRF2 from degradation by tankyrase and prevents their inappropriate localization [13].
Figure 1

The structure of shelterin. TRF1 and TRF2 bind to double strand (ds) DNA and form two separate complexes with other shelterin proteins. POT1 binds to single strand (ss) DNA while RAP1 binds to DNA at the ds-ss joint. PINX1 is a TRF1 binding protein. TIN2 binds TRF1 and TRF2 spontaneously and protects TRF1 from being degraded by tankyrase. TPP1 and POT1 form a heterodimer. TPP1 links TIN2 and POT1/TPP1 and recruits telomerase to the shelterin complex.

POT1 and TRF2 interact with each other and protect the telomeres from the DNA damage response triggered by the ATR and ATM pathways independently [14],[15]. POT1-deleted mice show increased p53-dependent apoptosis, as well as elevated DNA damage response and chromosomal fusions [16]. TPP1 forms a heterodimer with POT1 and acts as the bridge between the TRF1 complex and telomerase [17],[18].

Telomeres and telomerase in hematologic malignancies

Acute leukemia (AL)

AL is characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of myeloid precursor cells (acute myeloid leukemia, AML) or lymphoblast cells (acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ALL). Shortened telomere length is observed in patients with AL and is associated with chromosome instability. Capraro et al. reported that AL patients with an aberrant karyotype have significantly shorter telomere length than patients with a normal karyotype, and those patients with multiple aberrations possess the shortest telomeres. They also compared telomere length and telomerase activity in different subtypes of AL cells. They found that B-ALL cells had the shortest telomeres and the highest level of telomerase activity among all the subtypes of AL. Leukemia cells with abnormal karyotypes exhibited shorter telomeres than those with a normal karyotype (4.5 kb vs. 9.14 kb in ALL, 4.33 kb vs. 7.06 kb in AML) [19]. The order of telomerase activity is ranked B-ALL > AML > T-ALL.

The hTERT component of telomerase possesses many alternatively-spliced forms in which only the full-length transcript (+α + β) can be translated into a properly active enzyme. B-ALL cells exhibit the highest proportion of the full-length active product, in line with the trend in telomerase activity. Among all French-American-British (FAB) subtypes of AML, M0 and M3 have the lowest telomerase activity [19]. The telomerase activity of ALL cells has been reported to be higher in male patients with than in female patients. This may be due to the negative regulatory function of estrogen on telomerase [20].

Shortened telomere length and increased telomerase activity are associated with reduced response to chemotherapy, faster disease progression and poor prognosis in patients with AL. AML patients in the late stage of the disease have shorter telomere lengths and higher telomerase activity than those in the early stages. Relapsed AML patients have the shortest telomere length and highest telomerase activity [21],[22]. Asfour et al. reported that apoptosis of the leukemic blasts was blocked by telomerase in ALL patients, resulting in an increased tumor burden, faster disease progression and shortened survival [20]. Telomerase activities in ALL patients correlated to the enzyme concentration of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which is an adverse prognostic factor in ALL patients [20].

Altered expression of shelterin proteins has also been reported in de novo acute leukemic cells. Shi et al. reported that the expression of TRF1, which is a negative regulator of telomerase activity, was lower in patients with AL than in normal volunteers [23]. Ohyashiki et al. reported that patients with high hTERT expression or longer telomere length tended to have higher levels of TRF1 expression [24]. Capraro et al. compared the expression of shelterin proteins between different subtypes of AL. They found that TRF1 expression was reduced in AL and was lowest in AML patients. Meanwhile TRF2 expression was increased in AL and was highest in B-ALL patients, especially in B-ALL patients with abnormal karyotype. Expression of both TPP1 and RAP1 was increased in AL and was highest in T-ALL patients [19]. After chemotherapy, the TRF1 expression level increased in patients achieving complete remission (CR) but not in those patients in whom CR was not achieved [23]. When the acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) cell line HL-60 was induced to differentiate into mature cells, telomerase activity was reduced and the expression of TRF1, TRF2 and TIN2 was increased [25].

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

CLL is characterized by an abnormal expansion of mature B lymphocytes. Reliable prognostic factors are crucial for choosing therapeutic strategies in CLL patients and in predicting the outcome (reviewed by Kipps) [26]. Shorter telomeres, increased telomerase activity and altered expression of shelterin proteins are all observed in CLL patients. Patients with high-risk genomic aberrations, 11q or 17p deletions, undergo more severe telomere attrition due to the loss of ATM or p53, which are necessary to trigger p53-dependent apoptosis and the DNA damage response [27]. CLL patients with ATM mutations all display extreme telomere shortening independent of disease stage [28]. Patients with the chromosome aberration of a 17p deletion also show up-regulated c-myc which is a positive regulator of hTERT [29]. Functional assessment of the TP53 pathway was recently proposed as a method to precisely identify high risk CLL [30]. More evidence will be necessary to confirm the connection between telomere dysregulation and dysfunction of the TP53 pathway in CLL patients.

The observed shortening of telomere length in CLL patients was in line with other classical biological factors of CLL, including unmutated immunoglobulin variable region genes (UM-IGVH), CD38 and ZAP-70 positivity (>30%) and short (<6 months) lymphocyte doubling time [29]. Sellmann et al. reported a linear correlation between the frequency of IGHV gene mutations and the length of the telomeres [31]. CLL patients with shorter telomere length experienced worse clinical outcomes including shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [29],[32]. Thus telomere length was indicated as a negative prognostic factor and a threshold of -4.2 kb was suggested to be a predictive separation in Sellmann’s study [31].

Shelterin alterations were also identified in CLL patients and were found to be involved in telomere instability. The expression levels of TRF1, RAP1 and POT1 were all reported to be reduced in B-CLL cells, while the expression of TPP1 was increased [33]. In contrast, the expression of TPP1 and TIN2 were reported to be down-regulated in newly diagnosed Binet stage A CLL patients in another study [34]. Telomere dysfunction caused by a POT1-encoding gene mutation was recently identified in CLL patients. The frequency of POT1 mutation was 3.5% in CLL patients and reached 9% in CLL patients without IGHV mutations [35].

Chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML)

CML is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by the presence of BCR/ABL fusion genes which encode the Bcr-Abl fusion protein. The tyrosine kinase activity of the Bcr-Abl fusion protein induces oxidative damage and telomere shortening by generating reactive oxygen species [36]. A shorter average telomere length was found in leukemic cells of CML patients compared with white blood cells of age-matched healthy individuals or BCR/ABL-negative T lymphocytes from the same patients [37]. Furthermore, telomere shortening was accelerated as the disease progressed from the chronic phase (CP) to the blastic phase (BP), with a rate approximately 10 times that in normal controls. Patients with a high-risk Hasford score at diagnosis exhibited significantly greater telomere loss than patients with a low-risk score, while patients with intermediate risk showed an intermediate telomere loss rate [38]. Average telomere length increased when patients achieved complete cytogenetic remission (CCR) under treatment with Imatinib Mesylate (IM) owing to the hematopoietic reconstruction of BCR/ABL negative cells. In contrast, patients who did not respond to IM exhibited a decrease in telomere length consistent with rapid cell division [38]. Braig et al. utilized bone marrow cells of telomerase knockout mice to establish a CML-like cell culture. They demonstrated the presence of shorted telomeres with an increase in the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors associated with proliferation control in telomerase negative CML-like cells. Their work indicated that a telomerase-targeting strategy could induce senescence in CML-like cells and alleviate the tumor promoting/progressing effect of BCR-ABL [39]. Bakalova et al. demonstrated cross-talk between Bcr-Abl/c-Abl tyrosine kinase and telomerase in CML/ALL cells. Antisense inhibition of Bcr-Abl/c-Abl proteins was able to reactivate telomerase to maintain cell proliferation. Therefore the combination of TKI and telomerase targeting may be a promising strategy in CML treatment [40].

Individual telomere lengths have been determined in CML patients. Pronounced shortening of telomeres has been found on Yp, Yq, 1q, 5q, 9q, 8p, 21p and 21q. Genomic instability caused by high telomere attrition rates on the Y chromosome and on chromosome 21 might account for secondary chromosomal abnormalities during disease progression. An interesting finding was that telomere length in some individual chromosome ends was well maintained or even elongated. Some long-telomere chromosome arms (7q, 11p, 15p, and 18p) recurrently and specifically showed up in CML samples compared with healthy controls. Long telomeres on key chromosomes may contribute to a cell proliferation advantage during clonal selection in the early stage of CML ontogenesis [41],[42].

The circular extra-chromosomal telomeric repeat (ECTR), one of the ALT hallmarks, was used to define ALT activation in CML patients in a recent study. In this study, 27% of CML patients in CP were reported to exhibit both high ALT activity and telomerase activities. As telomerase activity increases with disease progression, the dominating telomere maintenance mechanism might transition from ALT to telomerase [43].

Altered expression of shelterin proteins was also reported in progressing CML patients. Campbell et al. reported that expression levels of TRF1 and TRF2 were increased in CML patients in the CP and in the accelerated phase (AP) but reduced to a level comparable to normal controls in the majority of patients in the BP. Increased expression of TRF1 may thus induce telomere shortening in CML in both the CP and AP [44]. High levels of TRF2 and tankyrase might contribute to the delay in senescence signaling triggered by the critically shortened telomeres and the consequent maintenance of telomere length. When K562 cells were treated with Anti-Bcr-Abl mRNA, decreased expression of TRF1 and TIN2 were observed [40].

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)

MDS are a group of disorders characterized by dysplastic features in the hematopoietic cells with the tendency to progress into acute leukemia [45]. By reason of the heterogeneity of the diseases, results of telomere length of MDS patients are not consistent. Recently, shortened telomeres have been reported in isolated peripheral blood leukocytes, CD15+ myeloid cells and CD19+ lymphocytes of MDS patients [46]. Although the MDS clone originates within the myeloid compartment, abolishment of T-lymphocytes differentiation and loss of naïve T-cells are consequences of hTERT deficiency [47]. However, telomere lengths in marrow stromal cells are reported to be stabilized well [48]. The telomere lengths of individual chromosome arms was measured by Lange et al., who found markedly longer telomeres in several chromosome arms in patients with an isolated monosomy 7 compared with patients with a normal karyotype or a complex karyotype [49]. The mechanism(s) involved in the stabilization or elongation of telomeres in patients with monosomy 7 still requires future exploration.

Patients with telomere shortening at the time of diagnosis showed a high frequency of complex chromosome abnormalities, faster disease evolution and shorter survival time [50],[51]. Sieglová et al. compared the telomere length of MDS patients with different FAB subtypes. Telomere length in the early phases of MDS (RA and RARS) was longer compared to that in advanced forms of MDS (RAEB + RAEB-T) and was shortest in secondary AML from MDS. A significant negative correlation between telomere length in bone marrow cells of MDS patients and the International Prognostic Score System (IPSS) score was observed [52]. In order to stabilize telomere length, hTERT expression level and telomerase activity were increased in MDS patients in the more advanced stages [53]. Thus shortened telomeres and increased telomerase activity could be regarded as prognostic factors for MDS patients. In a recent study, three-dimensional quantitative FISH of telomeres was carried out on nuclei from bone marrow samples of MDS and AML patients. Three-dimensional (3D) telomeric profiles which were determined based on the nuclear telomeric architecture, telomere numbers, the presence of telomere aggregates, telomere signal intensities, nuclear volumes, and nuclear telomere distribution, confirmed a dynamic and evolutionary process of telomere dysfunction during the transformation of MDS to AML [54].

Telomeres and telomerase in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)

HSCT is a potential curative therapy for many hematologic disorders and immunodeficiency diseases. The self-renewal capacity of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is essential for reconstitution of the hematopoietic system. The proliferative potential of HSCs decreases with differentiation and age in line with the shortening of telomeres and increased telomerase activities in these cells. Mean telomere length is shorter in HSCs purified from adult bone marrow than from fetal liver or umbilical cord blood [55]. Telomerase activity is higher in HSCs during the late development stage than in non-expanding HSCs [56].

hTERT-deleted mice have been used as a telomerase-deficient model for the study of telomerase function in the hematopoietic system [57]–[59]. Sekulovic et al. reported the loss of a 10 kb length of the telomere of leukocytes generated from hTERT knockout HSCs after 6 days of in vitro expansion and 3 months of regeneration in secondary-transplanted recipient mice [57]. Telomere dysfunction impaired mesenchymal progenitor cell function, reducing the capacity of bone marrow stromal cells for maintaining functional HSCs. When wild-type HSCs were transplanted into TERC-knockout recipient mice, accelerated myelopoiesis and impaired B-cell development occurred [59].

Patients who received autologous or allogeneic HSCT (auto-HSCT or allo-HSCT) experienced more severe erosion of telomere length in their blood cells under massive differentiation pressure compared with their donors. Akiyama et al. reported that the telomeres of transplanted cells became shortened by up to 1.9 kb in auto-HSCT recipients over an observation period of 5.3 years, the same frequency of telomere erosion as would occur over 15–20 years in normal individuals. Telomere erosions of up to 2.1 kb were observed in patients who received allo-HSCT [60]. Baerlocher et al. evaluated 44 long-term survivors after allo-HSCT with a median follow-up of 17.5 years. Significantly shortened telomere length was observed in all blood cells lineages, including granulocytes, naïve/memory T cells, B cells and natural killer/natural killer T cells in the recipients compared with that in their donors [61]. The rate of telomere shortening in recipients is highest in the first year after HSCT and then slows down to a rate similar to that of their donor and of healthy controls [62]. Telomere shortening in patients who received allo-HSCT seems to be more sensitive to the influence of ageing than auto-HSCT. A correlation between donor age and telomere shortening rate has been found in allo-HSCT but not in auto-HSCT recipients [60].

In allo-HSCT, more severe telomere shortening is associated with elderly donors, female donors and the development of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) [60],[61]. The accelerated telomere shortening of transplanted female donor cells may be a consequence of the deficiency of estrogen-upregulated telomerase activity after transplantation [63]. Patients who develop cGVHD also show more severe telomere attrition, probably due to chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. In contrast, development of acute GVHD (aGVHD) has no significant impact on telomere length in recipients [61]. CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) constitute a lymphocyte subgroup responsible for the control of cGVHD. Patients with telomerase deficiency in Treg have impaired proliferative capacity of these cells and consequently a higher incidence of moderate or severe cGVHD [64].

Treatments involved in the HSCT procedure could also have an impact on the telomere homeostasis of engrafted HSCs and may eventually influence the outcomes of recipients (Figure 2). In patients who received auto-HSCT, pre-transplantation chemotherapy has a significant influence on the telomere length of transplanted cells. Telomere length is negatively related to the number of courses of cytoreductive therapy received by patients [60]. Ricca et al. compared telomere length in peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBSCs) collected after two tightly-spaced high-dose (hd) chemotherapy courses. Telomere length was significantly shorter in PBSCs collected after the second course (hd-Ara-C) compared to that collected after the first course (hd-CY) [65]. This difference in telomere length of collected PBSCs determines the telomere length of the hematopoietic cells after auto-HSCT. In another study patients transplanted with PBSCs from the second collection had significantly shorter telomeres than those who received PBSCs from the first collection [66].
Figure 2

Factors affecting telomere length and recipient outcomes in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Mobilization, older donors, and female donors are related to shortened telomeres in donor stem cells. Chemotherapy and conditioning courses before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) could also accelerate telomere shortening in host cells. The telomere length (TL) of grafted stem cells is mainly determined by the pretransplantation TL of donor cells, but is also affected by the host environment and by the occurrence of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD). The TL of engrafted donor stem cells is important for the continuous and stable reconstitution of the hematopoietic system.

Donors’ HSCs with longer telomeres could offer a replicative advantage and lead to faster granulocyte recovery in the recipient after HSCT. In contrast, patients with shorter telomere lengths after HSCT took a longer period to reach neutrophil recovery and had a greater risk of developing hematopoietic disorders [67]. Accelerated telomere shortening and consequent chromosomal instability are independently associated with the development of therapy-related myelodysplasia or acute myelogenous leukemia (t-MDS/AML) after auto-HSCT in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In patients who developed t-MDS/AML, reduced proliferative capacity of HSCs contributed to decreased generation of committed progenitors [68].

The telomere length of hematopoietic cells in the recipient before HSCT, which represents the inner environment of host, is another factor impacting the outcome of transplantation. Peffault et al. reported that treatment-related mortality was inversely correlated with age-adjusted recipients’ pre-transplantation telomere length in their lymphocytes (hazard ratio, 0.4) in patients who received allo-HSCT, especially in patients with advanced stage disease [69].

Telomerase-targeting therapies

Since the increased expression of hTERT and activation of telomerase are universally involved in oncogenesis and the progression of hematopoietic malignancies, telomerase inhibition could be an effective antineoplastic strategy for therapy (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Telomerase inhibition therapies utilized in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Telomerase-based immunotherapies utilize telomerase-associated antigens to produce an immune response which ultimately leads to lysis of tumor cells. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), arsenic trioxide (ATO), interferon alpha (IFN-α) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) reduce the expression of hTERT; imetelstat (GRN163) is complementary to the template region of the telomerase RNA component hTERC, competitively binding and blocking telomerase; BIBR1532 inhibits the specific active site of hTERT.

Immunotherapies

Telomerase-based immunotherapies utilize telomerase-associated antigens to elicit CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses and the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response, which ultimately lead to lysis of tumor cells.

GV1001 is an MHC class II-restricted hTERT peptide vaccine, which consists of amino acids 611–626 of the hTERT active site. Granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and Toll-like receptor-7 (TLR-7) have been used as adjuvants in the GV1001 vaccine to eliminate the problem of self-tolerance. Preclinical studies in B-CLL patients confirmed that telomerase-positive leukemic cells can naturally induce telomerase-specific T cells [70]. However, a recent randomized phase III clinical trials reported that combining GV1001 to gemcitabine and capecitabine did not improve the overall survival of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer [71].

Another vaccine, Vx-001, consists of a cryptic peptide of hTERT or its optimized version with a modified tyrosine (Y1) residue at the first amino-acid and enhanced peptide affinity. The efficacy and safety of Vx-001 has been confirmed in mouse model and in phase I/II clinical trials in patients with various types of tumors. This vaccine is now scheduled for testing in a phase III clinical trial in NSCLC patients [72]–[74].

GRNVAC1 is a dendritic cell (DC) -based telomerase-associated vaccine. Immature DCs are mobilized and isolated from the patient’s own peripheral blood then transduced with mRNAs encoding the full-length hTERT protein in vitro. The lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP-1) mRNA sequence is co-transduced into DCs to make the antigen easily degradable and to enhance the immune response [75]. GRNVAC1 was tested in a randomized phase II clinical trial in patients with AML. Prolonged vaccination (up to 32 administrations) of GRNVAC1 in AML patients was well tolerated in most patients, and produced a greater effect in AML patients at high risk of relapse [76],[77].

Antisense oligonucleotide

GRN163L (Imetelstat) is the most promising oligonucleotide possessing the ability to block telomerase by acting as a complementary sequence to hTERC. In an in vitro study, GRN163L showed effective inhibition of telomerase and of cell growth in B-CLL cells and tumor initiating B cells of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) [78],[79]. GRN163L has been entered into stage I and II clinical trials in patients with refractory and relapsed MM and some types of solid tumors. GRN163L was reported to be generally well-tolerated in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. The most common treatment-related event was thrombocytopenia and prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The most marked hematologic toxicity was observed in two patients with prior auto-HSCT [80]. That may have been due to blockage of telomerase activity in HSCs which impaired reconstitution of the hematologic system. In a recent single-center study, GRN163L was shown to be effective in inducing morphologic and molecular remissions in patients with myelofibrosis, with a response rate of 44% [81].

BIBR1532

BIBR1532 is a synthetic non-nucleotidic small molecule which selectively inhibits the active site of telomerase. BIBR1532 leads to progressive telomere shortening and apoptotic cell death in a concentration-dependent manner in AML cell lines as well as in primary cells from patients with AML or CLL [82]–[84]. BIBR1532 inhibits the activity of telomerase through transcriptional suppression of survivin-mediated c-Myc and hTERT expression, increasing p73 and p21 expression, up-regulating the Bax/Bcl-2 molecular ratio and finally increasing P53-induced apoptosis [84],[85]. P53 is the final executant of the telomerase-inhibiting effect of BIBR1532. In P53-negative K562 cells, the telomere length was stabilized when it reached approximately 5 kb [85].

Other drugs with telomerase inhibiting activity

IM (Gleevec), the first selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), is reported to cause a dose-dependent inhibition of telomerase activity in various leukemia cell lines, including BCR-ABL negative cell lines [86]–[88]. IM regulates telomerase activity by decreasing the expression of hTERT and increasing the expression of telomerase inhibitor protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) [87]. Following treatment with IM, the expression levels of TRF1, TRF2 and PinX1 are markedly reduced. The second-generation TKIs nilotinib and dasatinib, which have higher potency than imatinib against BCR-ABL (reviewed by Wei et al.), are more effective in reducing telomerase activity [89],[90].

Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is successfully used to induce complete remission and to trigger apoptotic death of APL cells [91],[92]. Ghaffari et al. reported a dose-dependent inhibition of telomerase activity of ATO and a reduction in telomere length in ATO-treated NB4 cells. The mRNA levels of Pin1, survivin, c-Myc, hTERT, and PinX1 were all reduced in a concentration-dependent manner after 2 days of ATO treatment [93].

Interferons (IFNs) are multi-functional cytokines produced by eukaryotic cells. Xu et al. reported that IFN-α could significantly down-regulate the expression of hTERT and the activity of telomerase in many types of human hematologic malignant cell lines, primary leukemic cells and T-lymphocytes within 4 hours of treatment at a concentration of 5000 U/mL, through suppressing the hTERT promoter activity [94]. Lindkvist et al. reported that IFN-γ could also induce a decrease of hTERT expression. hTERT mRNA levels were virtually abolished after 48 h of IFN-γ treatment at 5000 U/mL [95].

Conclusions

Telomeres are essential for the maintenance of chromosome stability in mammalian cells. Accelerated telomere shortening leads to activation of telomerase in stem cells and in the majority of tumor cells. In patients with hematologic malignancies, shortened telomeres and increased telomerase activity are usually observed and are associated with disease progression. In patients who have received HSCT the telomere length of engrafted stem cells is closely related to the outcomes of HSCT. Consequently the telomere characteristics should be taken into consideration during donor selection. It is also necessary to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy and conditioning courses on telomere length. Many promising telomerase targeting therapies have been confirmed to be tolerable and efficient to induce immune responeses in patients with hematological malignancies. However optimized strategies are still required to ensure their clinical efficiency. Further work will be needed to elucidate the complete story of telomere biology and to explore efficient telomerase-targeting therapies in hematologic malignances.

Abbreviations

ATM: 

Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated gene

ATR: 

Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3

ALT: 

Alternative lengthening of telomeres

ss DNA: 

Single-strand DNA

ds DNA: 

Double-strand DNA

TRF1: 

Telomeric repeat-binding factors 1

TRF2: 

Telomeric repeat-binding factors 2

TIN2: 

TRF1-interacting nuclear factor 2

Rap1: 

TRF2-interacting protein 1

POT1: 

Protection of telomeres protein 1

TPP1: 

POT1 and TIN2-interacting protein 1

AL: 

Acute leukemia

AML: 

Acute myeloid leukemia

ALL: 

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

LDH: 

Lactate dehydrogenase

CR: 

Complete remission

APL: 

Acute promyelocytic leukemia

CLL: 

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

UM-IGVH: 

Unmutated immunoglobulin variable region

PFS: 

Progression-free survival

OS: 

Overall survival

CML: 

Chronic myelocytic leukemia

CP: 

Chronic phase

BP: 

Blastic phase

CCR: 

Completely cytogenetic remission

IM: 

Imatinib Mesylate

ECTR: 

Extra-chromosomal telomeric repeat

AP: 

Accelerated phase

MDS: 

Myelodysplastic syndromes

IPSS: 

International Prognostic Score System

3D: 

Three-dimensional

HSCT: 

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

HSCs: 

Hematopoietic stem cells

auto-HSCT: 

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

allo-HSCT: 

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

GVHD: 

Graft-versus-host disease

cGVHD: 

Chronic graft-versus-host disease

aGVHD: 

Acute graft-versus-host disease

Treg: 

Regulatory T cells

PBSCs: 

Peripheral blood progenitor cells

t-MDS/AML: 

Therapy-related myelodysplasia or acute myelogenous leukemia

CTL: 

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte

GM-CSF: 

Granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor

TLR-7: 

Toll-like receptor-7

DC: 

Dendritic cell

MM: 

Multiple myeloma

APTT: 

Activated partial thromboplastin time

TKI: 

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors

PP2A: 

Protein phosphatase 2A

ATO: 

Arsenic trioxide

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The work was funded by the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81230014), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2012AA020905), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81100387, 81170501) and the Major Technology Program (Key Social Development) of the Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2012C13021-1).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Haematology, Guangzhou Liuhuaqiao Hospital
(3)
Department of Haematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University

References

  1. Blackburn EH: Structure and function of telomeres. Nature. 1991, 350: 569-573. 10.1038/350569a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Griffith JD, Comeau L, Rosenfield S, Stansel RM, Bianchi A, Moss H, de Lange T: Mammalian telomeres end in a large duplex loop. Cell. 1999, 97: 503-504. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80760-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Olovnikov AM: A theory of marginotomy. The incomplete copying of template margin in enzymic synthesis of polynucleotides and biological significance of the phenomenon. J Theor Biol. 1973, 41: 181-190. 10.1016/0022-5193(73)90198-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Harley CB, Futcher AB, Greider CW: Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature. 1990, 345: 458-460. 10.1038/345458a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Takai H, Smogorzewska A, de Lange T: DNA damage foci at dysfunctional telomeres. Curr Biol. 2003, 13: 1549-1556. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00542-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Shay JW, Bacchetti S: A survey of telomerase activity in human cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1997, 33: 787-791. 10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00062-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryan TM, Englezou A, Dalla-Pozza L, Dunham MA, Reddel RR: Evidence for an alternative mechanism for maintaining telomere length in human tumors and tumor-derived cell lines. Nat Med. 1997, 3: 1271-1274. 10.1038/nm1197-1271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Greider CW, Blackburn EH: A telomeric sequence in the RNA of Tetrahymena telomerase required for telomere repeat synthesis. Nature. 1989, 337: 331-337. 10.1038/337331a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng J, Funk WD, Wang SS, Weinrich SL, Avilion AA, Chiu CP, Adams RR, Chang E, Allsopp RC, Yu J: The RNA component of human telomerase. Science. 1995, 269: 1236-1241. 10.1126/science.7544491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. de Lange T: Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres. Genes Dev. 2005, 19: 2100-2110. 10.1101/gad.1346005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Arat NÖ, Griffith JD: Human Rap1 interacts directly with telomeric DNA and regulates TRF2 localization at the telomere. J Biol Chem. 2012, 287: 41583-41594. 10.1074/jbc.M112.415984.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen Y, Yang Y, van Overbeek M, Donigian JR, Baciu P, de Lange T, Lei M: A shared docking motif in TRF1 and TRF2 used for differential recruitment of telomeric proteins. Science. 2008, 319: 1092-1096. 10.1126/science.1151804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ye JZ, Donigian JR, van Overbeek M, Loayza D, Luo Y, Krutchinsky AN, Chait BT, de Lange T: TIN2 binds TRF1 and TRF2 simultaneously and stabilizes the TRF2 complex on telomeres. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 47264-47271. 10.1074/jbc.M409047200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kendellen MF, Barrientos KS, Counter CM: POT1 association with TRF2 regulates telomere length. Mol Cell Biol. 2009, 29: 5611-5619. 10.1128/MCB.00286-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Denchi EL, de Lange T: Protection of telomeres through independent control of ATM and ATR by TRF2 and POT1. Nature. 2007, 448: 1068-1071. 10.1038/nature06065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang Y, Shen MF, Chang S: Essential roles for Pot1b in HSC self-renewal and survival. Blood. 2011, 118: 6068-6077. 10.1182/blood-2011-06-361527.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ye JZ, Hockemeyer D, Krutchinsky AN, Loayza D, Hooper SM, Chait BT, de Lange T: POT1-interacting protein PIP1: a telomere length regulator that recruits POT1 to the TIN2/TRF1 complex. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 1649-1654. 10.1101/gad.1215404.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nandakumar J, Bell CF, Weidenfeld I, Zaug AJ, Leinwand LA, Cech TR: The TEL patch of telomere protein TPP1 mediates telomerase recruitment and processivity. Nature. 2012, 492: 285-289. 10.1038/nature11648.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Capraro V, Zane L, Poncet D, Perol D, Galia P, Preudhomme C, Bonnefoy-Berard N, Gilson E, Thomas X, El-Hamri M, Chelghoun Y, Michallet M, Wattel E, Mortreux F, Sibon D: Telomere deregulations possess cytogenetic, phenotype, and prognostic specificities in acute leukemias. Exp Hematol. 2011, 39: 195-202.e2. 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Asfour IA, Fayek MH, El-Kourashy SA, Youssef SR, El-Gohary GM, Mohamed OF: Correlation of telomerase activity to apoptosis and survival in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: an Egyptian single-center study. Ann Hematol. 2008, 87: 213-221. 10.1007/s00277-007-0395-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang Y, Fang M, Sun X, Sun J: Telomerase activity and telomere length in acute leukemia: correlations with disease progression, subtypes and overall survival. Int J Lab Hematol. 2010, 32: 230-238. 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2009.01178.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ohyashiki JH, Ohyashiki K, Iwama H, Hayashi S, Toyama K, Shay JW: Clinical implications of telomerase activity levels in acute leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 1997, 3: 619-625.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shi JM, Huang H, Chen QF, Lin MF: A study of the relationship between expression level of TRF1 protein and telomerase activity in human acute leukemia. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2006, 7: 154-158. 10.1631/jzus.2006.B0154.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohyashiki JH, Hayashi S, Yahata N, Iwama H, Ando K, Tauchi T, Ohyashiki K: Impaired telomere regulation mechanism by TRF1 (telomere-binding protein), but not TRF2 expression, in acute leukemia cells. Int J Oncol. 2001, 18: 593-598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yamada K, Yagihashi A, Yamada M, Asanuma K, Moriai R, Kobayashi D, Tsuji N, Watanabe N: Decreased gene expression for telomeric-repeat binding factors and TIN2 in malignant hematopoietic cells. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22: 1315-1320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kipps TJ: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Curr Opin Hematol. 2000, 7: 223-234. 10.1097/00062752-200007000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Véronèse L, Tournilhac O, Callanan M, Prie N, Kwiatkowski F, Combes P, Chauvet M, Davi F, Gouas L, Verrelle P, Guièze R, Vago P, Bay JO, Tchirkov A: Telomeres and chromosomal instability in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2013, 27: 490-493. 10.1038/leu.2012.194.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Britt-Compton B, Lin TT, Ahmed G, Weston V, Jones RE, Fegan C, Oscier DG, Stankovic T, Pepper C, Baird DM: Extreme telomere erosion in ATM-mutated and 11q-deleted CLL patients is independent of disease stage. Leukemia. 2012, 26: 826-830. 10.1038/leu.2011.281.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Roos G, Kröber A, Grabowski P, Kienle D, Bühler A, Döhner H, Rosenquist R, Stilgenbauer S: Short telomeres are associated with genetic complexity, high-risk genomic aberrations, and short survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2008, 111: 2246-2252. 10.1182/blood-2007-05-092759.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pozzo F, Dalbo M, Peragine N, Bomben R, Zucchetto A, Rossi F, Degan M, Rossi D, Chiarenza A, Grossi A, Di Raimondo F, Zaja F, Pozzato G, Secchiero P, Gaidano G, Del Poeta G, Zauli G, Fo ÀR, Guarini A, Gattei V: Detection of TP53 dysfunction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by an in vitro functional assay based on TP53 activation by the non-genotoxic drug Nutlin-3: a proposal for clinical application. J Hematol Oncol. 2013, 6: 83-10.1186/1756-8722-6-83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sellmann L, de Beer D, Bartels M, Opalka B, Nückel H, Dührsen U, Dürig J, Seifert M, Siemer D, Küppers R, Baerlocher GM, Röth A: Telomeres and prognosis in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Int J Hematol. 2011, 93: 74-82. 10.1007/s12185-010-0750-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Counter CM, Gupta J, Harley CB, Leber B, Bacchetti S: Telomerase activity in normal leukocytes and in hematologic malignancies. Blood. 1995, 85: 2315-2320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Poncet D, Belleville A, t’kint de Roodenbeke C, Roborel de Climens A, Simon B, Callet-Bauchu E, Salles G, Sabatier L, Delic J, Gilson E: Changes in the expression of telomere maintenance genes suggest global telomere dysfunction in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2008, 111: 2388-2391. 10.1182/blood-2007-09-111245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Capraro V, Zane L, Poncet D, Perol D, Galia P, Preudhomme C, Bonnefoy-Berard N, Gilson E, Thomas X, El-Hamri M, Chelghoun Y, Michallet M, Wattel E, Mortreux F, Sibon D: Telomeric damage in early stage of chronic lymphocytic leukemia correlates with shelterin dysregulation. Blood. 2011, 118: 1316-1322. 10.1182/blood-2010-07-295774.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramsay AJ, Quesada V, Foronda M, Conde L, Martínez-Trillos A, Villamor N, Rodríguez D, Kwarciak A, Garabaya C, Gallardo M, López-Guerra M, López-Guillermo A, Puente XS, Blasco MA, Campo E, López-Otín C: POT1 mutations cause telomere dysfunction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2013, 45: 526-530. 10.1038/ng.2584.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sattler M, Verma S, Shrikhande G, Byrne CH, Pride YB, Winkler T, Greenfield EA, Salgia R, Griffin JD: The BCR/ABL tyrosine kinase induces production of reactive oxygen species in hematopoietic cells. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 24273-24278. 10.1074/jbc.M002094200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Brummendorf TH, Holyoake TL, Rufer N, Barnett MJ, Schulzer M, Eaves CJ, Eaves AC, Lansdorp PM: Prognostic implications of differences in telomere length between normal and malignant cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemiameasured by flow cytometry. Blood. 2000, 95: 1883-1890.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Drummond M, Lennard A, Brûmmendorf T, Holyoake T: Telomere shortening correlates with prognostic score at diagnosis and proceeds rapidly during progression of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2004, 45: 1775-1781. 10.1080/10428190410001693542.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Braig M, Pällmann N, Preukschas M, Steinemann D, Hofmann W, Gompf A, Streichert T, Braunschweig T, Copland M, Rudolph KL, Bokemeyer C, Koschmieder S, Schuppert A, Balabanov S, Brümmendorf TH: A ‘telomere-associated secretory phenotype’ cooperates with BCR-ABL to drive malignant proliferation of leukemic cells.Leukemia in press.Google Scholar
  40. Bakalova R, Ohba H, Zhelev Z, Kubo T, Fujii M, Ishikawa M, Shinohara Y, Baba Y: Antisense inhibition of Bcr-Abl/c-Abl synthesis promotes telomerase activity and upregulates tankyrase in human leukemia cells. FEBS Lett. 2004, 564: 73-84. 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00318-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Samassekou O, Li H, Hébert J, Ntwari A, Wang H, Cliché CG, Bouchard E, Huang S, Yan J: Chromosome arm-specific long telomeres: a new clonal event in primary chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. Neoplasia. 2011, 13: 550-560.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Samassekou O, Ntwari A, Hébert J, Yan J: Individual Telomere Lengths in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Neoplasia. 2009, 11: 1146-1154.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Samassekou O, Malina A, Hébert J, Yan J: Presence of alternative lengthening of telomeres associated circular extrachromosome telomere repeats in primary leukemia cells of chronic myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2013, 6: 26-10.1186/1756-8722-6-26.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Campbell LJ, Fidler C, Eagleton H, Peniket A, Kusec R, Gal S, Littlewood TJ, Wainscoat JS, Boultwood J: hTERT, the catalytic component of telomerase, is downregulated in the haematopoietic stem cells of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2006, 20: 671-679. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR, Sultan C: Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1982, 51: 189-199. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1982.tb08475.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rollison DE, Epling-Burnette PK, Park JY, Lee JH, Park H, Jonathan K, Cole AL, Painter JS, Guerrier M, Meléndez-Santiago J, Fulp W, Komrokji R, Lancet J, List AF: Telomere length in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Lymphoma. 2011, 52: 1528-1536. 10.3109/10428194.2011.568648.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang L, Mailloux A, Rollison DE, Painter JS, Maciejewski J, Paquette RL, Loughran TP, McGraw K, Makishima H, Radhakrishnan R, Wei S, Ren X, Komrokji R, List AF, Epling-Burnette PK: Naive T-cells in myelodysplastic syndrome display intrinsic human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) deficiency. Leukemia. 2013, 27: 897-906. 10.1038/leu.2012.300.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Marcondes AM, Bair S, Rabinovitch PS, Gooley T, Deeg HJ, Risques R: No telomere shortening in marrow stroma from patients with MDS. Ann Hematol. 2009, 88: 623-628. 10.1007/s00277-008-0649-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lange K, Holm L, Vang Nielsen K, Hahn A, Hofmann W, Kreipe H, Schlegelberger B, Göhring G: Telomere shortening and chromosomal instability in myelodysplastic syndromes. Gene Chromosome Canc. 2010, 49: 260-269.Google Scholar
  50. Ohyashiki JH, Ohyashiki K, Fujimura T, Kawakubo K, Shimamoto T, Iwabuchi A, Toyama K: Telomere shortening associated with disease evolution patterns in myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer Res. 1994, 54: 3557-3560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ohyashiki JH, Iwama H, Yahata N, Ando K, Hayashi S, Shay JW, Ohyashiki K: Telomere stability is frequently impaired in high-risk groups of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Clin Cancer Res. 1999, 5: 1155-1160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sieglová Z, Zilovcová S, Cermák J, Ríhová H, Brezinová D, Dvoráková R, Marková M, Maaloufová J, Sajdová J, Brezinová J, Zemanová Z, Michalová K: Dynamics of telomere erosion and its association with genome instability in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myelogenous leukemia arising from MDS: a marker of disease prognosis?. Leuk Res. 2004, 28: 1013-1021. 10.1016/j.leukres.2003.11.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Briatore F, Barrera G, Pizzimenti S, Toaldo C, Casa CD, Laurora S, Pettazzoni P, Dianzani MU, Ferrero D: Increase of telomerase activity and hTERT expression in myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009, 8: 883-889.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Gadji M, Adebayo Awe J, Rodrigues P, Kumar R, Houston DS, Klewes L, Dièye TN, Rego EM, Passetto RF, de Oliveira FM, Mai S: Profiling three-dimensional nuclear telomeric architecture of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia defines patient subgroups. Clin Cancer Res. 2012, 18: 3293-3304. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0087.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Vaziri H, Dragowska W, Allsopp RC, Thomas TE, Harley CB, Lansdorp PM: Evidence for a mitotic clock in human hematopoietic stem cells: loss of telomeric DNA with age. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994, 91: 9857-9860. 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9857.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Engelhardt M, Kumar R, Albanell J, Pettengell R, Han W, Moore MA: Telomerase regulation, cell cycle, and telomere stability in primitive hematopoietic cells. Blood. 1997, 90: 182-193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sekulovic S, Gylfadottir V, Vulto I, Gasparetto M, Even Y, Brookes C, Smith C, Eaves CJ, Lansdorp PM, Rossi FM, Humphries RK: Prolonged self-renewal activity unmasks telomerase control of telomere homeostasis and function of mouse hemopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2011, 118: 1766-1773. 10.1182/blood-2010-11-319632.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Blasco MA, Lee HW, Hande MP, Samper E, Lansdorp PM, DePinho RA, Greider CW: Telomere shortening and tumor formation by mouse cells lacking telomerase RNA. Cell. 1997, 91: 25-34. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80006-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Ju Z, Jiang H, Jaworski M, Rathinam C, Gompf A, Klein C, Trumpp A, Rudolph KL: Telomere dysfunction induces environmental alterations limiting hematopoietic stem cell function and engraftment. Nat Med. 2007, 13: 742-747. 10.1038/nm1578.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Akiyama M, Asai O, Kuraishi Y, Urashima M, Hoshi Y, Sakamaki H, Yabe H, Furukawa T, Yamada O, Mizoguchi H, Yamada H: Shortening of telomere in recipients of both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000, 25: 441-447. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Baerlocher GM, Rovó A, Müller A, Matthey S, Stern M, Halter J, Heim D, Rischewski J, Gratwohl A, Tichelli A: Cellular senescence of white blood cells in very long-term survivors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the role of chronic graft-versus-host disease and female donor sex. Blood. 2009, 114: 219-222. 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209833.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rufer N, Brümmendorf TH, Chapuis B, Helg C, Lansdorp PM, Roosnek E: Accelerated telomere shortening in hematological lineages is limited to the first year following stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2001, 97: 575-577. 10.1182/blood.V97.2.575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Imanishi T, Hano T, Nishio I: Estrogen reduces endothelial progenitor cell senescence through augmentation of telomerase activity. J Hypertens. 2005, 23: 1699-1706. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000176788.12376.20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Kawano Y, Kim HT, Matsuoka K, Bascug G, McDonough S, Ho VT, Cutler C, Koreth J, Alyea EP, Antin JH, Soiffer RJ, Ritz J: Low telomerase activity in CD4+ regulatory T cells in patients with severe chronic GVHD after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2011, 118: 5021-5030. 10.1182/blood-2011-06-362137.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Ricca I, Compagno M, Ladetto M, Rocci A, Dell’Aquila M, Omedè P, De Marco F, D’Antico S, Caracciolo D, Ferrero D, Carlo-Stella C, Tarella C: Marked telomere shortening in mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) following two tightly-spaced high-dose chemotherapy courses with G-CSF. Leukemia. 2005, 19: 644-651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruella M, Rocci A, Ricca I, Carniti C, Bodoni CL, Ladetto M, Caracciolo D, Boccadoro M, Carlo-Stella C, Corradini P, Tarella C: Comparative assessment of telomere length before and after hematopoietic SCT: role of grafted cells in determining post-transplant telomere status. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010, 45: 505-512. 10.1038/bmt.2009.297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Mangerini R, Lanino E, Terranova P, Faraci M, Pistillo MP, Gaetani GF, Ferraris AM: Telomere length of donors influences granulocyte recovery in children after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ann Hematol. 2009, 88: 1029-1031. 10.1007/s00277-009-0712-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Chakraborty S, Sun CL, Francisco L, Sabado M, Li L, Chang KL, Forman S, Bhatia S, Bhatia R: Accelerated telomere shortening precedes development of therapy-related myelodysplasia or acute myelogenous leukemia after autologous transplantation for lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 791-798. 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1033.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Peffault de Latour R, Calado RT, Busson M, Abrams J, Adoui N, Robin M, Larghero J, Dhedin N, Xhaard A, Clave E, Charron D, Toubert A, Loiseau P, Socié G, Young NS: Age-adjusted recipient pretransplantation telomere length and treatment-related mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012, 120: 3353-3359. 10.1182/blood-2012-01-403337.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Kokhaei P, Palma M, Hansson L, Osterborg A, Mellstedt H, Choudhury A: Telomerase (hTERT 611–626) serves as a tumor antigen in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and generates spontaneously antileukemic, cytotoxic T cells. Exp Hematol. 2007, 35: 297-304. 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.10.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Middleton G, Silcocks P, Cox T, Valle J, Wadsley J, Propper D, Coxon F, Ross P, Madhusudan S, Roques T, Cunningham D, Falk S, Wadd N, Harrison M, Corrie P, Iveson T, Robinson A, McAdam K, Eatock M, Evans J, Archer C, Hickish T, Garcia-Alonso A, Nicolson M, Steward W, Anthoney A, Greenhalf W, Shaw V, Costello E, Naisbitt D, Rawcliffe C, Nanson G, Neoptolemos J: Gemcitabine and capecitabine with or without telomerase peptide vaccine GV1001 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (TeloVac): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15: 829-840. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70236-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Georgoulias V, Douillard JY, Khayat D, Manegold C, Rosell R, Rossi A, Menez-Jamet J, Iché M, Kosmatopoulos K, Gridelli C: A multicenter randomized phase IIb efficacy study of Vx-001, a peptide-based cancer vaccine as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: treatment rationale and protocol dynamics. Clin Lung Cancer. 2013, 14: 461-465. 10.1016/j.cllc.2013.02.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Kotsakis A, Vetsika EK, Christou S, Hatzidaki D, Vardakis N, Aggouraki D, Konsolakis G, Georgoulias V, Christophyllakis C, Cordopatis P, Kosmatopoulos K, Mavroudis D: Clinical outcome of patients with various advanced cancer types vaccinated with an optimized cryptic human telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) peptide: results of an expanded phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2012, 23: 442-449. 10.1093/annonc/mdr396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Bolonaki I, Kotsakis A, Papadimitraki E, Aggouraki D, Konsolakis G, Vagia A, Christophylakis C, Nikoloudi I, Magganas E, Galanis A, Cordopatis P, Kosmatopoulos K, Georgoulias V, Mavroudis D: Vaccination of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with an optimized cryptic human telomerase reverse transcriptase peptide. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 2727-2734. 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Su Z, Vieweg J, Weizer AZ, Dahm P, Yancey D, Turaga V, Higgins J, Boczkowski D, Gilboa E, Dannull J: Enhanced induction of telomerase-specific CD4(+) T cells using dendritic cells transfected with RNA encoding a chimeric gene product. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 5041-5048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. DiPersio JF, Collins RH, Blum W, Devetten MP, Stiff P, Elias L, Reddy A, Smith JA, Khoury HJ: Immune responses in AML patients following vaccination with GRNVAC1, autologous RNA transfected dendritic cells expressing telomerase catalytic subunit hTERT [abstract]. Blood. 2009, 114: 633-Google Scholar
  77. Khoury HJ, Collins RH, Blum W, Maness L, Stiff P, Kelsey SM, Reddy A, Smith JA, DiPersio JF: Prolonged administration of the telomerase vaccine GRNVAC1 is well tolerated and appears to be associated with favorable outcomes in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [abstract]. Blood. 2010, 116: 2190-Google Scholar
  78. Lin C, Damle RN, Chiorazzi N, Chin AC: GRN163L inhibits telomerase activity in B-CLL cells [Abstract]. Blood. 2005, 106: 5041-Google Scholar
  79. Brennan SK, Wang Q, Tressler R, Harley C, Go N, Bassett E, Huff CA, Jones RJ, Matsui W: Telomerase inhibition targets clonogenic multiple myeloma cells through telomere length-dependent and independent mechanisms. Plos ONE. 2010, 5: e12487-10.1371/journal.pone.0012487.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Chanan-Khan AA, Munshi NC, Hussein MA, Elias L, Benedetti F, Smith J, Khor SP, Huff CA: Results of a phase I study of GRN163L, a direct inhibitor of telomerase, in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Blood. 2008, 112: 1263-Google Scholar
  81. Tefferi A, Begna K, Laborde RR, Patnaik MM, Lasho TL, Zblewski D, Finke C, Schimek L, LaPlant BR, Hanson CA, Stuart MJ, Pardanani A: Imetelstat, a telomerase inhibitor, induces morphologic and molecular remissions in Myelofibrosis and reversal of bone marrow fibrosis [Abstract]. Blood. 2013, 122: 662-Google Scholar
  82. Bashash D, Ghaffari SH, Zaker F, Kazerani M, Hezave K, Hassani S, Rostami M, Alimoghaddam K, Ghavamzadeh A: BIBR1532 increases arsenic trioxide-mediated apoptosis in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells: therapeutic potential for APL. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2013, 13: 1115-1125. 10.2174/18715206113139990126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Bashash D, Ghaffari SH, Mirzaee R, Alimoghaddam K, Ghavamzadeh A: Telomerase inhibition by non-nucleosidic compound BIBR1532 causes rapid cell death in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013, 54: 561-568. 10.3109/10428194.2012.704034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Bashash D, Ghaffari SH, Zaker F, Hezave K, Kazerani M, Ghavamzadeh A, Alimoghaddam K, Mosavi SA, Gharehbaghian A, Vossough P: Direct short-term cytotoxic effects of BIBR 1532 on acute promyelocytic leukemia cells through induction of p21 coupled with downregulation of c-Myc and hTERT transcription. Cancer Invest. 2012, 30: 57-64. 10.3109/07357907.2011.629378.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Brassat U, Balabanov S, Bali D, Dierlamm J, Braig M, Hartmann U, Sirma H, Günes C, Wege H, Fehse B, Gontarewicz A, Dikomey E, Borgmann K, Brümmendorf TH: Functional p53 is required for effective execution of telomerase inhibition in BCR-ABL-positive CML cells. Exp Hematol. 2011, 39: 66-76. 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Chai JH, Zhang Y, Tan WH, Chng WJ, Li B, Wang X: Regulation of hTERT by BCR-ABL at multiple levels in K562 cells. BMC Cancer. 2011, 11: 512-10.1186/1471-2407-11-512.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Uziel O, Fenig E, Nordenberg J, Beery E, Reshef H, Sandbank J, Birenbaum M, Bakhanashvili M, Yerushalmi R, Luria D, Lahav M: Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) downregulates telomerase activity and inhibits proliferation in telomerase-expressing cell lines. Br J Cancer. 2005, 92: 1881-1891. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602592.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Mor-Tzuntz R, Uziel O, Shpilberg O, Lahav J, Raanani P, Bakhanashvili M, Rabizadeh E, Zimra Y, Lahav M, Granot G: Effect of imatinib on the signal transduction cascade regulating telomerase activity in K562 (BCR-ABL-positive) cells sensitive and resistant to imatinib. Exp Hematol. 2010, 38: 27-37. 10.1016/j.exphem.2009.10.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Wei G, Rafiyath S, Liu D: First-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: dasatinib, nilotinib, or imatinib. J Hematol Oncol. 2010, 3: 47-10.1186/1756-8722-3-47.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Shapira S, Granot G, Mor-Tzuntz R, Raanani P, Uziel O, Lahav M, Shpilberg O: Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors reduce telomerase activity in K562 cells. Cancer Lett. 2012, 323: 223-231. 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.04.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Jing Y, Dai J, Chalmers-Redman RM, Tatton WG, Waxman S: Arsenic trioxide selectively induces acute promyelocytic leukemia cell apoptosis via a hydrogen peroxide-dependent pathway. Blood. 1999, 94: 2102-2111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Yedjou C, Tchounwou P, Jenkins J, McMurray R: Basic mechanisms of arsenic trioxide (ATO)-induced apoptosis in human leukemia (HL-60) cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2010, 3: 28-10.1186/1756-8722-3-28.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Ghaffari SH, Momeny M, Bashash D, Mirzaei R, Ghavamzadeh A, Alimoghaddam K: Cytotoxic effect of arsenic trioxide on acute promyelocytic leukemia cells through suppression of NFkbeta-dependent induction of hTERT due to down-regulation of Pin1 transcription. Hematology. 2012, 17: 198-206. 10.1179/1607845412Y.0000000008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Xu D, Erickson S, Szeps M, Gruber A, Sangfelt O, Einhorn S, Pisa P, Grandér D: Interferon alpha down-regulates telomerase reverse transcriptase and telomerase activity in human malignant and nonmalignant hematopoietic cells. Blood. 2000, 96: 4313-4318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Lindkvist A, Ivarsson K, Jernberg-Wiklund H, Paulsson-Karlsson Y: Interferon-induced sensitization to apoptosis is associated with repressed transcriptional activity of the hTERT promoter in multiple myeloma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 341: 1141-1148. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.