Open Access

Long-term immune reconstitution and T cell repertoire analysis after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in systemic sclerosis patients

  • Dominique Farge1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Lucas C. M. Arruda2, 4, 5,
  • Fanny Brigant2,
  • Emmanuel Clave2, 3,
  • Corinne Douay2, 3,
  • Zora Marjanovic6,
  • Christophe Deligny7,
  • Guitta Maki8,
  • Eliane Gluckman9, 10,
  • Antoine Toubert2, 3, 8 and
  • Helene Moins-Teisserenc2, 3, 8
Journal of Hematology & Oncology201710:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-016-0388-5

Received: 11 October 2016

Accepted: 30 December 2016

Published: 19 January 2017

Abstract

The determinants of clinical responses after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) are still unraveled. We analyzed long-term immune reconstitution (IR) and T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire diversity in 10 SSc patients, with at least 6 years simultaneous clinical and immunological follow-up after aHSCT. Patients were retrospectively classified as long-term responders (A, n = 5) or non-responders (B, n = 5), using modified Rodnan’s skin score (mRSS) and forced vital capacity (FVC%). All patients had similar severe SSc before aHSCT. Number of reinjected CD34+ cells was higher in group B versus A (P = 0.02). Long-term mRSS fall >25% was more pronounced in group A (P = 0.004), the only to improve long-term FVC% >10% (P = 0.026). There was an overall trend toward increased of T cell reconstitution in group B versus A. B cells had a positive linear regression slope in group A (LRS = 11.1) and negative in group B (LRS = −11.6). TCR repertoire was disturbed before aHSCT and the percentage of polyclonal families significantly increased at long-term (P = 0.046), with no difference between groups. Despite improved skin score after aHSCT in all SSc patients, pretransplant B cell clonal expansion and faster post-transplant T cell IR in long-term non-responder/relapsing patients call for new therapeutic protocols guided by IR analysis to improve their outcome.

Keywords

Systemic sclerosisT cell repertoireImmune reconstitutionHematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Introduction

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by progressive fibrosis in the skin and internal organs [1], with 5-year mortality rates up to 30% in rapidly progressive diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) according to the extent of lung, heart, and kidney involvement [2]. In severe SSc patients, early European and North American phase I–II clinical studies showed that autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) allowed rapid and durable regression of skin and lung fibrosis [3, 4] with improved functional status [5]. Results from the Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation International Scleroderma (ASTIS) multicenter randomized phase III trial demonstrated that aHSCT confers better long-term survival than 12 monthly intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide in 156 early severe dcSSc patients [6]. With around 1000 SSc patients worldwide transplanted, aHSCT has become the best treatment option for severe rapidly progressive SSc [7].

The rationale for treating autoimmune diseases (AD) with aHSCT involves non-specific abrogation of autoreactivity, mainly T and B cells, followed by reconstitution of a more tolerant immune system and self-protective profile [8, 9], in the ideal context that environmental triggering factors will no longer be effective [10]. Studies in a few AD patients showed that aHSCT acts differently from standard immunosuppression, which modulates specific components of the autoimmunity process, while aHSCT allows to reset the immune response and induces de novo tolerance [7]. Therefore, immunological monitoring is a key element of clinical follow-up post-transplant [11].

We had previously reported the early immune reconstitution (IR) profile associated with clinical remission shortly and up to 1 year after high-dose cyclophosphamide and CD34+-selected aHSCT in seven SSc patients [8]. Recovery of CD3+ T cell reconstitution was delayed with persistent CD4+ T cell lymphopenia. NK cells returned to normal within a month after transplant, while circulating B cell levels were inversely associated with clinical response, suggesting that pathogenic B cell clones might preferentially expand if unfavorable outcome [8]. Thereafter, Tsukamoto et al. found persistent inversion of the Th2/Th1 ratio in eleven SSc patients until 3 years post-aHSCT [12]. In a pilot study, we reported restoration of Tregs and their suppressive function 2 years after aHSCT in seven SSc patients compared to controls [13], and partial fall of the pre-transplant increase in pro-fibrotic and Th2-cytokines serum levels [14]. Several questions remain, such as which of the post-transplant IR mechanisms are most relevant to warrant prolonged remission and what is the duration of the immunological transplant-induced effects?

We therefore designed the present study to analyze the long-term IR, using combined approaches of immunophenotyping and T cell receptor (TCR) diversity analysis according to the observed clinical response in 10 SSc patients before and up to at least 6 years after aHSCT.

Methods

Study design and patients

We selected 10 SSc patients treated with aHSCT at Saint-Louis Hospital (Paris, France) and for whom repeated simultaneous clinical and immunological monitoring had been obtained until long-term, at least 6 years, after HSCT. All patients gave a written informed consent. They had received CD34+-selected aHSCT, without or with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG, Genzyme) as part of the previously published ISAMAIR [3] or ASTIS [6] protocols approved by the ethics committee. As a control group, 18 healthy donors were tested to determine the reference values of TCR diversity.

Transplant procedure

Transplant procedure was previously described [3, 6]. In brief, mobilization and collection of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells (PBSC) using cyclophosphamide at 2 g/m2/day on two consecutive days followed 4 days later by rHu G-CSF (Lenograstim®, Aventis and Chugai Pharma France) at 5 μg/kg/day subcutaneously until the last apheresis. PBSC were collected when CD34+ cells were above 20/μL in peripheral venous blood and CD34+ cells were selected using immunomagnetic bead technique (Nexel Isolex®300i Stem Cell Collection System). Conditioning was performed at least 4 weeks later, using cyclophosphamide at 50 mg/kg/day from day 5 to day 2 prior to CD34+-selected HSC reinjection without or with rATG. All patients received rHu G-CSF after the graft until neutrophil recovery.

Clinical follow-up before and after aHSCT

Clinical follow-up was performed as previously described during the first year after aHSCT [8] and thereafter at yearly intervals plus or minus 6 months. Clinical response after aHSCT was assessed by the same observer using repeated functional and physical examination of organ involvement. Relapse was defined by any of the following criteria [15]: an increase of skin score by 25% from best improvement, as assessed by modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), or a decline in forced vital capacity (FVC, %) by 10%, renal crisis, start of total parenteral nutrition, or restarting of immune suppressive or modulating medication. According to the clinical response at long-term, SSc patients were retrospectively classified as long-term responders (group A) and non-responders or relapse or necessitating immunosuppression (group B) within the first 6 years post-aHSCT. We analyzed their IR profiles and evolution of TCR repertoire according to the clinical outcome after aHSCT.

Immunomonitoring

At time of each clinical evaluation before and after AHSCT, blood and serum samples were drawn for IR analysis. Prospective lymphocyte immunophenotyping was performed on freshly collected whole blood samples, using a FACS Canto II flow cytometer and FACS DIVA software (BD Biosciences, le Pont de Claix, France). Absolute counts were determined using the TruCount system (BD Biosciences) with BD Multitest (BD Biosciences). Eight color labeling was performed with the following mAbs: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD16, CD56, CD45RA, CD45RO, and CD19. Data were analyzed using FACS Diva (BD Biosciences). Anti-Scl-70 antibody level detection was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as previously described [8] and after the year 2010 by BioPlex ANA Screen (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

T cell repertoire and clonality

Determination of TCR-Vβ usage was made from total RNA using quantitative “Immunoscope” [8]. Briefly, RNA was purified using TriReagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH). Synthesis of complementary DNA (cDNA), complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) gene amplifications, run-off using an internal β-chain gene constant fluorescent primer, gel running, and Immunoscope software analysis were performed [8]. The definition of Immunoscope profiles as polyclonal, skewed, or negative was based on the identification of peaks that deviate from the normal distribution curve [8].

Statistical analysis

All results are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between patient groups related to individual conditions were assessed with Mann-Whitney test and ANCOVA for general linear regression analysis, using SPSS software. To reduce intra-group variability induced by individual differences at entry, we used both mean absolutes values and percentages of the total number of cells at inclusion that remained at each time follow-up post-aHSCT for IR analysis, and global trends were expressed using linear regression slope (LRS) [8].

Results

Patients clinical characteristics and response to aHSCT

Ten severe SSc patients, five males, mean age of 37.4 ± 13.9 years, were included in the study. According to the observed clinical response during an overall mean follow-up of 7.8 ± 0.8 years, five patients were long-term responders (group A) and the five others (group B) had either no response or clinical relapse or necessitated immunosuppression post-aHSCT. All were severe dcSSc patients with similar functional status and organ involvement before aHSCT. There was no clinical difference between groups A (n = 5) and B (n = 5) before transplant, including for mRSS (28 ± 5.7 vs 31 ± 15.2, ns) and FVC% (80 ± 22.2 vs 61 ± 8.8, ns) (Table 1). During the month prior to transplant (baseline), patients received no treatment (n = 6) or low dose oral steroids below or equal to 10 mg/day (n = 4). The individual patients’ graft characteristics and engraftment duration after CD34+ aHSCT without (n = 4) or with rATG (n = 6) are in Table 1. The number of reinjected CD34+ cells was higher in group B versus A (4.1 ± 1.3 vs 6.9 ± 2.0, P = 0.02), while time to hematopoietic platelets and neutrophils reconstitution were similar in both groups. After transplant, patients received either no treatment up to long-term follow-up (n = 5, group A) or mycophenolate mofetil 1–2 g/day (n = 5, group B). Low-dose oral steroids below or equal to 10 mg/day were given in three out of five group A and B patients. Compared to pretransplant mRSS values (29 ± 11.0, n = 10), all SSc patients had a significant decrease in skin score at 1 year (19 ± 11.1, P = 0.029) which was sustained until 6 years (8 ± 9.3, P = 0.006, Fig. 1a). The significant regression of skin score, with a fall in mRSS greater than 25% compared to pretransplant values, was present in both groups throughout all follow-up (Fig. 1b) and was significantly more pronounced at long-term in group A than in group B patients (P = 0.004, Fig. 1b). Compared to pretransplant FVC values (in % of normal, Fig. 1c), there was no overall change in the lung function post-aHSCT when considering all 10 SSc patients. However, the relative FVC% changes compare to pre-transplant values differed significantly between the two groups during follow-up (P = 0.040, ANCOVA), and at long-term, significant improvement of FVC above 10% compared to pretransplant values was observed in group A (P = 0.026, Fig. 1d).
Table 1

Patients’ clinical characteristics (n = 10) with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (SSc) before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) and graft characteristics at study inclusiona

 

Group A patients (n = 5)

 

Group B patients (n = 5)

  
 

1

2

3

4

5

Mean (±SD)

1

2

3

4

5

Mean (±SD)

Mean (±SD)

Patients characteristics at inclusion

 Age, years

40

56

53

47

24

44 ± 12.7

24

27

52

19

32

30.8 ± 12.7

37.4 ± 13.9

 Sex

M

M

M

F

F

M

M

F

F

F

 Disease duration, monthsb

6

18

29

20

18

18.2 ± 8.2

3

6

27

24

36

19.2 ± 14.1

18.7 ± 10.9

 Steroids at inclusion, mg/day

7

10

0

10

0

5.4 ± 5.1

0

7

0

0

0

1.7 ± 3.5

3.8 ± 4.6

 SHAQ (0–3)

0.87

2.87

1.625

2

1.8 ± 0.8

1.25

2

2.125

0.16

1.4 ± 0.9

1.6 ± 0.8

 mRSS (0–51)

26

22

37

29

25

27.8 ± 5.7

16

22

52

42

23

31 ± 15.2

29.4 ± 11.0

 FVC, %

56

89

87

108

58

79.6 ± 22.2

52

72

63

56

60.7 ± 8.8

71.2 ± 19.3

 DLCO, % predicted

45

75

72

56

48

59.2 ± 13.7

56

47

72

46

30

50.2 ± 15.4

54.7 ± 14.5

 LVEF, %

58

82

62

61

73

67.2 ± 10.0

60

63

67

70

65 ± 4.4

66.2 ± 7.7

 Serum creatinine, μmol/L

67

76

77

51

67.8 ± 12.0

52

73

60

59

71

63 ± 8.8

65.1 ± 10.0

 CRP level, mg/L

62

2

15

20

2

20.2 ± 24.7

9

51

66

13

10

35 ± 27.8

26.8 ± 25.6

 Anti-Scl-70 antibodies, U/ml

120

+

0

10.2

+

43.3 ± 66.5

0

+

39.1

130

21.3

47.6 ± 57.2

45.8 ± 55.8

Graft characteristics and engraftment duration

 CD34+ cells × 106 infused/kgc

4.9

2.9

4.9

2.5

5.3

4.1 ± 1.3

5.8

6.3

5.19

8.79

7.2

6.9 ± 2.0

5.5 ± 2.2

 CFU-GM cells × 104 infused/kgd

12.37

2.7

88

34.3 ± 46.7

23

48

9.97

52.56

91

44.9 ± 31.2

40.9 ± 34.7

 Days to 0.5 × 109 neutrophils/L

10

10

11

10

10

10.2 ± 0.4

10

7

10

9

9

9 ± 1.2

9.6 ± 1.1

 Days to 20 × 109 platelets/L

8

10

10

9

7

8.8 ± 1.3

8

7

10

12

6

8.6 ± 2.4

8.7 ± 1.8

 Days to 50 × 109 platelets/L

10

10

13

9

10

10.4 ± 1.5

9

7

Not reached

14

9

9.7 ± 3.0

10.1 ± 2.1

Anti Scl-70 (antitopoisomerase I) antibodies were measured by ELISA and quantified results expressed in arbitrary units (U/ml)

M male, F female, SHAQ Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire, STE steroids, mRSS modified Rodnan skin thickness score, FVC forced vital capacity, DL CO diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, MUGA multiple gated acquisition scan, CRP C-reactive protein. + positive for anti-Scl-70 antibodies

aSee the “Results” section for description of groups

bCalculated since first diagnosis of systemic sclerosis

cQuantity of CD34+ progenitor cells contained in the graft. CD34+ cell recovery after cryopreservation was 95% (range 75–100%)

dGM-CFUs/kg were counted on day 14 using a clonogenic progenitor assay as previously described[8]

Fig. 1

Evolution of modified Rodnan skin score and pulmonary function before and until long-term follow-up (at least 6 years) after aHSCT in SSc patients clinical groups. a Evolution of modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) values in all patients (n = 10) from pre-transplant period (0 years) until long-term follow-up (at least 6 years) after aHSCT. b mRSS percentage of change (mean ± SD) in the long-term responders (group A, n = 5) and non-responders/relapsing (group B, n = 5) patients from pre-transplant period (baseline) until long-term follow-up (at least 6 years) after aHSCT. Dashed line represents 25% improvement on mRSS. c Evolution of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC%) in all SSc patients (n = 10) from pre-transplant period (0 years) until long-term follow-up (at least 6 years) after aHSCT. d Relative change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC%) (mean ± SD) in the long-term responders (group A, n = 5) and non-responders/relapsing (group B, n = 5) patients from pre-transplant period (baseline) until long-term follow-up (at least 6 years) after aHSCT. Dashed lines represent improvement (+10%) or worsening (−10%) on FVC. aHSCT autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. *P < 0.05 at long-term time-point. **P < 0.01 at long-term timepoint

Phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte populations after HSCT

At inclusion, the absolute values of T cell subsets, CD4+, CD4+CD45RA+, CD8+ T cells, and number of NK-cells were in normal ranges for all patients and remained stable after aHSCT with no difference between groups A and B (Table 2). The absolute number of B cells was lower in group A than in healthy donors (P < 0.05) and was comparable to controls in group B (Table 2). Due to lymphocyte counts variations between patients, we expressed data as percentage of cells compared to numbers before transplant. After aHSCT, there was an overall trend toward increased CD3+ (LRS = 16.8) and CD3+CD4+ (LRS = 12.5) T cell counts in group B compared to group A (LRS = 8.7 and 9.7, respectively) (Fig. 2a, b). A rapid increase in CD3+CD8+ T cell counts starting 2–3 years post-transplant was observed in group B (LRS = 21.8) patients although under immunosuppressive drugs, while they remained almost stable in group A (LRS = 5.0, Fig. 2c). The relative increase in the number of CD4+CD45RA+ was higher in group B (LRS = 12.9) than in group A (LRS = 2.6) patients (Fig. 2d). Memory CD4+CD45RO+ T cell IR profiles were similar in groups A (LRS = 7.2) and B (LRS = 10.5, Fig. 2e). The percentage of B cell change differed with a sustained positive slope in group A (LRS = 11.1), while the slope remained negative in group B (LRS = −11.6, Fig. 2f). Four out of five group A and three out of four group B patients seropositive for anti-Scl-70 before aHSCT became negative after (Table 3). There was no correlation between B cell counts and the presence of high levels of Scl-70 autoantibody (data not shown).
Table 2

Phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte population in long-term responders (group A, n = 5) and non-responders/relapse or necessitating immunosuppression (group B, n = 5) systemic sclerosis patients after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Lymphocyte population

Normal range (cell counts/ml)

At inclusion

2–3 years

4–5 years

Long term

Group A

Group B

Group A

Group B

Group A

Group B

Group A

Group B

Total

1718–2620

1862 ± 764

1318 ± 748

1348 ± 777

1034 ± 584

1408 ± 937

1135 ± 482

1579 ± 616

1316 ± 624

T cells (CD3+)

1008–1647

1135 ± 485

957 ± 629

937 ± 569

713 ± 477

917 ± 561

749 ± 440

1417 ± 187

1143 ± 527

CD4 T cells (CD3+CD4+)

587–1009

730 ± 163

563 ± 373

409 ± 269

405 ± 305

510 ± 315

412 ± 269

678 ± 345

576 ± 367

Naive CD4 T cells (CD4 + CD45RA+)

161–529

195 ± 161

145 ± 44

197 ± 171

152 ± 221

187 ± 193

158 ± 218

372 ± 175

290 ± 271

CD8 T cells (CD3+CD8+)

313–644

459 ± 182

345 ± 228

453 ± 259

282 ± 171

410 ± 245

299 ± 153

571 ± 39

443 ± 185

B cells (CD19+)

121–267

70 ± 53*

119 ± 91*

300 ± 391

137 ± 137

175 ± 56

208 ± 214

188 ± 63

197 ± 217

NK cells (CD3-CD16+CD56+)

82–340

176 ± 108

112 ± 34

151 ± 64*

92 ± 113*

115 ± 55

132 ± 100

150 ± 92

135 ± 101

Lymphocyte immonophenotyping was performed on fresh whole blood EDTA samples by direct eight-color immunofluorescence flow cytometry. Results are expressed as absolute numbers (mean ± SD) of cell counts/ml

*P = 0.014 between the groups (two-tailed Mann-Whitney)

Table 3

Anti-scl-70 autoantibodies

 

Group A patients

Group B patients

 

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

Anti-Scl-70 antibodies, U/ml

 Baseline

120

+a

0

10.2

+a

0

+a

39.1

130

21.3

 2–3 years

32.9

0

0

0

390

0

240

31.1

106.5

0

 4–5 years

11.6

0

0

0

257

0

352

15.9

+a

0

 Long term

0

0b

0b

0

>8b

0

3.8b

>8b

250

0

Anti-Scl-70 antibodies were measured at pre-transplant period (baseline) and sequentially during follow-up by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as described in methods section. Quantified results are expressed in arbitrary units/ml as previously published ([8])

aPositive for Anti-Scl-70 antibodies

bAnti-Scl-70 antibodies levels measured by BioPlex ANA Screen

Fig. 2

Evolution of lymphocytes immune reconstitution during long-term follow-up (at least 6 years) after aHSCT in SSc patients clinical groups. Results (mean ± SD) are expressed as percentages of the total numbers of lymphocytes at inclusion and the global trends of the immune reconstitution as linear regression slope (LRS) in the long-term responders (group A, n = 5) and non-responders/relapsing (group B, n = 5) from pre-transplant period (baseline) until long-term follow-up (at least 6 years) after aHSCT. a CD3+ total T cells. b CD3+CD4+ T cells. c CD3+CD8+ T cells. d CD4+CD45RA+ naïve T cells. e CD4+CD45RO+ memory T cells. f CD19+ B cells

TCR repertoire diversity

TCR-Vβ family quantifications showed the same relative usage of each family in all the 10 SSc patients before and at long-term after transplantation as observed in healthy subjects (Fig. 3a). As we [8] and others [16] previously reported in SSc patients, the TCR-Vβ family usage did not differ from age-matched controls. CDR3 size distribution was very disturbed with few polyclonal TCR-Vβ families and overexpression of skewed and/or negative families (data not shown). At long-term, distinct changes in repertoire compared to pretransplant TCR-Vβ profiles were observed (Fig. 3b). Two profiles were noted, with either the recovery of a polyclonal profile—similar to healthy individuals—as opposed to a skewed and disturbed repertoire before transplant or the persistence of disturbed profile with still oligoclonaly expanded TCR-Vβ families (Fig. 3b). Overall, T cell diversity improved in almost all long-term patients compared to baseline, and the percentage of polyclonal TCR-Vβ families increased significantly (P = 0.046) with no significant difference between groups A and B (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 3

TCR-Vβ family expression and T cell receptor β-chain spectratyping before and at long-term after aHSCT. a Quantification of each TCR-Vβ family at baseline (white bars) and at long-term (dark bars) after aHSCT in 10 dcSSc patients. Data are presented as mean ± SD. There are no differences between the clinical groups. b TCR-Vβ chain third complementarity-determining region size distribution profile of selected families at baseline (pre, upper level) and at long-term time point (lower level) for representative dcSSc patients who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Left: Polyclonal distribution achievement at long-term time point post-HSCT from a skewed and disturbed repertoire at baseline (patient 3, group A, responder). Right: Sustained disturbed distribution at long-term time point post-HSCT from a previously skewed profile at baseline (patient 1, group B, non-responders or relapse or necessitating immunosuppression). c T cell repertoire diversity as measured by the percentage of polyclonal TCR-Vβ families in all 10 dcSSc patients at baseline and at long-term follow-up (at least 6 years) after aHSCT

Discussion

Early clinical follow-up of SSc patients after aHSCT has shown rapid and significant improvement in mRSS [5] and improved or stable FVC and DLco on lung function tests [4, 5]. One year after transplant, clinical benefits were such that the North American ASSIST trial closed earlier, after enrollment of 19 instead of 60 SSc patients initially powered, due to failure to reach equipoise between aHSCT and the control group [4]. In the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) ASTIS trial, despite increased treatment-related mortality during the first year, treatment responses in SSc clinical outcome variables 2 years after aHSCT were higher than controls, allowing superior event-free and overall survival rates until 10 years. While all SSc patients selected for transplant had severe disease at entry, early clinical responses at 1 [5, 8] or 2 [6] years after aHSCT as well as baseline cardiac function [15] were shown to predict long-term clinical response.

In the present study, long-term clinical response was not related to disease severity before aHSCT, contrary to seven SSc patients previously analyzed for aHSCT response at 1 year [8]. This may be related to improved patient selection before transplant, while gaining knowledge in the field over the years and following updated EBMT guidelines [7, 15]. Meaningful differences were detected between the long-term responders and non-responders/relapsing patients according to the trends in early SSc clinical response and to global trends of IR. Of note, long-term improvement in skin score was obtained in all 10 patients with a mRSS fall >25%, which was more pronounced in group A patients, who were the only to improve FVC% above 10% after 6 years follow-up. Interestingly, when the two groups of long-term patients were analyzed, the early clinical trends concerning the relative improvements in mRSS and FVC (%) at 1 year after transplant became significant at long-term after transplant. These data suggest that evolution of clinical scores within the early years after transplant indicate long-term clinical responses.

Depending on the conditioning regimen and the underlying disease, several mechanisms contribute to the IR process after aHSCT, which duration vary according to individual patients [10]. During the early phase of IR, the re-emergence of naïve T and B cells, the renewal of the immune repertoire and reinstatement of synergistic immunoregulatory mechanisms are expected [11], but no study had yet evaluated the long-term IR after aHSCT in SSc patients. We also aimed to clarify if maintenance or rapid reintroduction of immunosuppression after transplant, as previously suggested [3], may improve patient outcome despite no response or relapse.

In these 10 severe SSc patients followed for long term after aHSCT, T, B, and NK cells were found within normal ranges before transplantation [8, 12, 13]. After aHSCT, the reconstitution of CD8+, CD4+CD45RA+, CD4+CD45RO+ T, and NK cells was achieved after 2–3 years, confirming previous trends at 1 year [8]. The relative increase in CD4+CD45RA+ after transplant showed sustained activation of the immune system in non-responders/relapsing patients. The same trends in IR were observed for all T cell subtypes, and of note, the CD3+CD8+ increase was steeper in the non-responders as compared to the responder group. This may reflect the persistence of an underlying disease mechanism in these patients [8] and call for new therapeutic protocols after transplant or use of adjuvant cellular therapy [3], such as mesenchymal stromal cells infusion, in order to damper the autoimmune and inflammatory response [17]. Delayed CD4+ T cell recovery was more pronounced in group A than in group B and was sustained at long-term. Further studies will help to decipher the complex interplay between CD4+ T cell subsets and their influence on post-transplant response in SSc and to better elucidate the role of stem cell memory T cells during IR after aHSCT [18].

Our results also suggest that pathogenic B cell clones preferentially expand before transplant in these SSc patients with less favorable outcome at 1 year and thereafter, as previous reported [8]. There was no correlation between the B cell counts and the anti-scl-70 autoantibody levels after aHSCT. However, four out five from group A patients and only one out five from group B patients became seronegative for anti-scl-70 at long-term, illustrating sustained autoimmunity in non-responders or relapsing patients despite reintroduction for immunosuppressive drugs. Nonetheless, the responder patients presented a sustained and positive B cell reconstitution slope, which underlines the need for further refined analysis of the respective number and function of the different B cells subsets, notably the regulatory B cells.

The TCR-Vβ repertoire at baseline was disturbed in all dcSSc patients compared to controls, with a higher number of families presenting a skewed and oligoclonaly expanded profile as previously reported [8, 16]. Here, we show sustained and higher clonal diversity of the TCR repertoire at long-term after transplant in both groups, irrespective of their long-term clinical response. Some oligoclonally expanded families were still found at long-term after transplant both in group A and B patients, indicating that either the patients residual T cells survived the conditioning or were re-infused with the graft at time of aHSCT and can persist for long term or that thymic rebound was not appropriately achieved. As thymic reactivation participate to the observed clinical response after aHSCT [810, 19], adjuvant therapies to support hematopoiesis and thymic output could be helpful to improve long-term clinical response [17, 20, 21].

In conclusion, despite improved skin score early after transplant in all SSc patients, pretransplant B cell clonal expansion and faster T cells IR after aHSCT were specific to long-term non-responder/relapsing patients. Immune reconstitution analysis will guide the clinicians for establishing new therapeutic protocols in long-term non-responding/relapsing patients after HSCT.

Abbreviations

AD: 

Autoimmune diseases

aHSCT: 

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

CDR3: 

Complementarity determining region 3

FVC: 

Forced Vital Capacity

IR: 

Immune reconstitution

LRS: 

Linear regression slope

mRSS: 

Modified Rodnan skin score

SSc: 

Systemic sclerosis

TCR: 

T cell receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Djaouida Bengoufa for her contribution to anti-Scl antibodies measurements and Pr Catherine Lock and Miss Pauline Lansiaux for their respective contribution to the study.

Funding

Funding was provided by “Groupe Francophone de Recherche sur la Sclérodermie” and “Association des Sclérodermiques de France”.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

DF, AT, and HMT conceived the study, participated in its design, and had full access to all of the data in the study. DF, LC, AT, and HTM take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. FB and GM carried out the FACS and molecular analyses and helped to draft the manuscript. EC and CD performed the molecular studies and revised and drafted the manuscript. DF, LC, ZM, EG, and LCMA analyzed and interpreted the data, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. DF, ZM, and CD were in charge of patients clinical follow-up and clinical data collection. LC, ZM, and CD analyzed and interpreted the clinical data and critically revised the manuscript. All authors were involved in data interpretation, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted with the approval of the ethics committee of St. Louis Hospital (Paris, France), and all patients and healthy donors gave their written informed consent.

In memoriam

We dedicate this work to the memory of Dr Homah Keshmandt, who passed away on December 10, 2015, at the age of 51 years, after unique contribution to patients’ clinical follow-up and clinical data monitoring for 15 years in the Internal Medicine Unit at ST Louis Hospital and whose dedication and excellence permitted the present work.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unité de Médecine Interne, Maladies Autoimmunes et Pathologie Vasculaire, UF 04, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis
(2)
INSERM UMR-1160, Institut Universitaire d’Hématologie
(3)
Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité
(4)
Center for Cell-based Therapy, Regional Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto
(5)
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo
(6)
Département d’Hématologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine
(7)
Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Pierre Zobda Quitman
(8)
Laboratoire d’Immunologie-Histocompatibilité, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis
(9)
Eurocord-Monacord, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis
(10)
Centre Scientifique de Monaco

References

  1. van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(11):2737–47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Fransen J, Popa-Diaconu D, Hesselstrand R, Carreira P, Valentini G, Beretta L, et al. Clinical prediction of 5-year survival in systemic sclerosis: validation of a simple prognostic model in EUSTAR centres. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(10):1788–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Farge D, Marolleau JP, Zohar S, Marjanovic Z, Cabane J, Mounier N, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of refractory systemic sclerosis: early results from a French multicentre phase I-II study. Br J Haematol. 2002;119(3):726–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burt RK, Shah SJ, Dill K, Grant T, Gheorghiade M, Schroeder J, et al. Autologous non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation compared with pulse cyclophosphamide once per month for systemic sclerosis (ASSIST): an open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9790):498–506.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Vonk MC, Marjanovic Z, van den Hoogen FHJ, Zohar S, Schattenberg AVMB, Fibbe WE, et al. Long-term follow-up results after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(1):98–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. van Laar JM, Farge D, Sont JK, Naraghi K, Marjanovic Z, Larghero J, et al. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Jama. 2014;311(24):2490.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Snowden JA, Saccardi R, Allez M, Ardizzone S, Arnold R, Cervera R, et al. Haematopoietic SCT in severe autoimmune diseases: updated guidelines of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011;47(6):770–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Farge D, Henegar C, Carmagnat M, Daneshpouy M, Marjanovic Z, Rabian C, et al. Analysis of immune reconstitution after autologous bone marrow transplantation in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(5):1555–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Alexander T, Thiel A, Rosen O, Massenkeil G, Sattler A, Kohler S, et al. Depletion of autoreactive immunologic memory followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with refractory SLE induces long-term remission through de novo generation of a juvenile and tolerant immune system. Blood. 2009;113(1):214–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Abrahamsson S, Muraro PA. Immune re-education following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Autoimmunity. 2008;41(8):577–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Alexander T, Bondanza A, Muraro PA, Greco R, Saccardi R, Daikeler T, et al. SCT for severe autoimmune diseases: consensus guidelines of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation for immune monitoring and biobanking. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(2):173–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsukamoto H, Nagafuji K, Horiuchi T, Mitoma H, Niiro H, Arinobu Y, et al. Analysis of immune reconstitution after autologous CD34+ stem/progenitor cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis: predominant reconstitution of Th1 CD4+ T cells. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(5):944–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Baraut J, Grigore EI, Jean-Louis F, Khelifa SH, Durand C, Verrecchia F, et al. Peripheral blood regulatory T cells in patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis (SSc) before and after autologous hematopoietic SCT: a pilot study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(3):349–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Michel L, Farge D, Baraut J, Marjanovic Z, Jean-Louis F, Porcher R, et al. Evolution of serum cytokine profile after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in systemic sclerosis patients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(8):1146–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Burt RK, Oliveira MC, Shah SJ, Moraes DA, Simoes B, Gheorghiade M, et al. Cardiac involvement and treatment-related mortality after non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation with unselected autologous peripheral blood for patients with systemic sclerosis: a retrospective analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9872):1116–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sakkas LI, Xu B, Artlett CM, Lu S, Jimenez SA, Platsoucas CD. Oligoclonal T cell expansion in the skin of patients with systemic sclerosis. J Immunol. 2002;168(7):3649–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhao K, Liu Q, Caplan A, Haynesworth S, Goshima J, Goldberg V, et al. The clinical application of mesenchymal stromal cells in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Xu L, Zhang Y, Luo G, Li Y. The roles of stem cell memory T cells in hematological malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2015;8(1):113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Arruda LCM, Clave E, Moins-Teisserenc H, Douay C, Farge D, Toubert A. Resetting the immune response after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases. Curr Res Transl Med. 2016;64(2):107–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ventura Ferreira MS, Bergmann C, Bodensiek I, Peukert K, Abert J, Kramann R, et al. An engineered multicomponent bone marrow niche for the recapitulation of hematopoiesis at ectopic transplantation sites. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Green MMB, Chao N, Chhabra S, Corbet K, Gasparetto C, Horwitz A, et al. Plerixafor (a CXCR4 antagonist) following myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation enhances hematopoietic recovery. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement