Skip to main content
Download PDF

2B4 costimulatory domain enhancing cytotoxic ability of anti-CD5 chimeric antigen receptor engineered natural killer cells against T cell malignancies

Journal of Hematology & Oncology volume 12, Article number: 49 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chimeric antigen receptor engineered T cells (CAR-T) have demonstrated extraordinary efficacy in B cell malignancy therapy and have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for diffuse large B cell lymphoma and acute B lymphocytic leukemia treatment. However, treatment of T cell malignancies using CAR-T cells remains limited due to the shared antigens between malignant T cells and normal T cells. CD5 is considered one of the important characteristic markers of malignant T cells and is expressed on almost all normal T cells but not on NK-92 cells. Recently, NK-92 cells have been utilized as CAR-modified immune cells. However, in preclinical models, CAR-T cells seem to be superior to CAR-NK-92 cells. Therefore, we speculate that in addition to the short lifespan of NK-92 cells in mice, the costimulatory domain used in CAR constructs might not be suitable for CAR-NK-92 cell engineering.

Methods

Two second-generation anti-CD5 CAR plasmids with different costimulatory domains were constructed, one using the T-cell-associated activating receptor-4-1BB (BB.z) and the other using a NK-cell-associated activating receptor-2B4 (2B4.z). Subsequently, BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK were generated. Specific cytotoxicity against CD5+ malignant cell lines, primary CD5+ malignant cells, and normal T cells was evaluated in vitro. Moreover, a CD5+ T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) mouse model was established and used to assess the efficacy of CD5-CAR NK immunotherapy in vivo.

Results

Both BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK exhibited specific cytotoxicity against CD5+ malignant cells in vitro and prolonged the survival of T-ALL xenograft mice. Encouragingly, 2B4.z-NK cells displayed greater anti-CD5+ malignancy capacity than that of BB.z-NK, accompanied by a greater direct lytic side effect versus BB.z-NK.

Conclusions

Anti-CD5 CAR-NK cells, particularly those constructed with the intracellular domain of NK-cell-associated activating receptor 2B4, may be a promising strategy for T cell malignancy treatment.

Background

The prognoses of patients with T cell malignancies remain poor [1,2,3,4]. There is no better treatment strategy than chemotherapy, which may not benefit refractory/relapsed patients and can lead to serious toxicity. It is thus imperative that novel effective targeted therapeutic strategies are developed. In recent years, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified immune cells have shown outstanding efficacy for the treatment of B cell malignancies [5, 6]. This indicated that using similar concepts to develop CAR-modified immune cells may help fight against T cell malignancies.

Conventional CAR immunotherapy utilizes modified T cells derived from patients to directly target and eliminate malignancies [6]. However, malignant T cells may have the same phenotypic and functional characteristics as normal T cells. This leads to difficulties in distinguishing therapeutic CAR engineered T (CAR-T) cells from malignant T cells, causing the mutual killing of CAR-T cells and limiting the function of CAR-T cells against T cell malignancies [7]. Mamonkin et al. constructed CAR-T cells targeting CD5+ T malignant cells and found that the delayed initial expansion of anti-CD5 CAR-T cells was mainly due to fratricide mediated by perforin secretion. [8]. Pinz et al. used anti-CD4 CAR-T cells to eliminate CD4+ T cell lymphomas (TCLs) or T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), demonstrating that almost all CD4+ CAR-T cells were also depleted. A recent study demonstrated that CD4+ CAR-T cells might have a “helper effect”, which could enhance the persistence and cytotoxicity of CD8+ CAR-T cells [9]. Thus, the self-killing of CD4+ CAR-T cells would decrease the cytotoxic ability of CAR-T cells. Moreover, circulating malignant T cells are often found in the peripheral blood of patients with T-ALL [10, 11] and some TCLs [12], which may lead to contamination of malignant T cells and then generate “CAR-malignant T cells” during the process of CAR-T cells preparation [7]. Ruella et al. reported a relapse in a patient after 9 months of anti-CD19 CAR-T cell treatment. The relapsed leukemia cells were CD19 negative, but anti-CD19 CAR was aberrantly expressed. They found that the CAR gene was accidentally transduced into a single B malignant cell during the process of CAR-T cell preparation, and its product concealed the CD19 epitope on the surface of leukemic cells, masking their recognition by CAR-T cells [13]. Similarly, the occurrence of “CAR-malignant T cells” may lead to disease relapse and adversely affect the prognosis of patient with T-ALL and TCL. Therefore, when targeting T-malignant cells, it is necessary to try other types of effector cells to circumvent the shortcomings of CAR-T cells.

Recently, another immune cell, the natural killer (NK) cell, has been used to engineer with CAR [14, 15]. The use of NK cells for CAR-NK cell manufacturing is a promising strategy to avoid mutual killing of CAR-T cells in the abovementioned situation. NK cells are an important part of the innate immune system and have natural cytotoxic ability against malignant cells. NK cells serve as allogeneic effectors, mediating their activity independent of major histocompatibility complexes. Therefore, NK cells do not need to be collected from a certain patient or a specific human leukocyte antigen matched donor to naturally induce graft-versus-host disease [16]. Unfortunately, NK cells from peripheral blood are difficult to transduce with CAR [17]. In our preliminary experiments, we tried different methods to improve the transfection efficiency of NK cells from peripheral blood, including increasing the lentivirus titer, but these failed and led to proliferation inhibition and apoptosis induction in NK cells. As a NK cell line, NK-92 cells have been used as effector cells in immunotherapy, but are derived from a patient with NK cell lymphoma and need to be irradiated before being administered into patients to prevent potential carcinogenicity. Recently, several studies have revealed that NK-92 cells (not transduced with CAR) are safe and effective for the treatment of relapsed/refractory hematological malignancies [18, 19].

CD5 is a type-I transmembrane glycosylated protein [20] that has a role in negative regulation of T cell receptor signaling [21, 22] and promotes the survival of normal and malignant lymphocytes [23, 24]. CD5 is not expressed on the surface of hematopoietic stem cells but is highly expressed by malignant T cells [25, 26]. Therefore, CD5 is currently considered one of the characteristic antigens of malignant T cells [8]. In addition, CD5 is also expressed in some B cell malignancies [27, 28]. Clinical trials using anti-CD5 monoclonal antibody have revealed a moderate therapeutic effect in patients with cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCLs) or chronic lymphocyte leukemia (CLL) [29, 30]. Chen et al. designed a third-generation anti-CD5 CAR construct with the T-cell-associated costimulator 4-1BB and CD28 to generate anti-CD5 CAR-NK-92 cells, which showed specific cytotoxicity against CD5+ malignant cells in vitro and in vivo [15].

However, at least in preclinical models, it appears that CAR-T cells seem to be superior to CAR-NK-92 cells [7]. CARs commonly contain three domains: an extracellular antigen binding domain, a transmembrane module, and an intracellular signaling transduction domain [31]. The transmembrane module primarily anchors the CAR structure on the cell membrane and is usually driven from the transmembrane region of CD8 or CD28. The classical intracellular signal transduction domain contains a CD3ζ cytoplasmic domain and one or more intracellular domains of costimulatory molecules, such as 4-1BB, CD28, OX40, or ICOS [32]. Different costimulatory domains endow CAR-T cells with different characteristics: a CD28 costimulatory domain stimulates more powerful cytotoxic ability of CAR-T cells, whereas the 4-1BB and ICOS costimulatory domain induces longer persistence of CAR-T cells [9]. All of these costimulatory factors play important roles in the activation and function of T cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that NK-cell-associated costimulatory factors could be used to activate NK cells and exert their cytotoxic effects.

We speculated that the NK-cell-associated costimulatory domain used in a CAR construct might be suitable for engineered CAR-NK-92 cells. Recently, Li et al. used transmembrane domains and costimulatory domains typically expressed in NK cells to construct CARs and found that CAR with a NKG2D transmembrane domain and 2B4 costimulatory domain displayed superior anti-ovarian cancer activity [14]. 2B4 is considered a NK-cell-specific costimulatory receptor belonging to the signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) family, which transduces activation signals through SLAM-associated protein (SAP). SAP interacts with the intracellular domain of 2B4 and regulates 2B4-dependent NK cell activation [33, 34].

In this study, the anti-CD5 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) domain of CAR was developed from a mouse anti-human CD5 monoclonal antibody (Clone HI211) that was previously established and validated in our institute. Two different anti-CD5-CARs with costimulators 4-1BB and 2B4 (referred to as BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK, respectively) were constructed. Their cytotoxic ability was evaluated, demonstrating that 2B4.z-NK cells exhibited rapid proliferation and higher anti-malignant efficacy in both malignant CD5+ cell lines and primary CD5+ malignant cells in vitro through upregulation of activation markers and cytotoxic granule release. Furthermore, the superior cytotoxic ability of 2B4.z-NK against T-ALL was confirmed in mouse xenograft models. In addition, both BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK have side effects on CD5+ normal T cells. To our knowledge, there has been no previous research describing such a strategy of using the 2B4 costimulatory domain to generate anti-CD5 CAR-NK cells for CD5+ malignancy treatment.

Methods

Patients and samples

Peripheral blood from healthy donors was acquired from the Tianjin Blood Center. Bone marrow samples were obtained from patients enrolled in the Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and patient samples were approved by the ethical advisory board of the Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital. All subjects signed an informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Plasmid construction and lentivirus production

The murine anti-human CD5 scFv derived from mouse hybridoma cells (clone HI211, which was established in our institute) was cloned into a previously constructed pCDH-CAR plasmid containing the 4-1BB costimulatory domain [35] to form a plasmid referred to as BB.z. Then, the 2B4 intercellular domain was used to replace the 4-1BB costimulatory domain of BB.z to construct a pCDH-CD5 scFv-CD8α hinge-CD8α transmembrane domain-2B4 costimulatory domain-CD3ζ plasmid (referred to as 2B4.z).

Lentiviral vectors were produced in 293T cells as previously described [36].

Cell culture

Jurkat, MOLT-4, MAVER-1, 293T, and NK-92 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. Jurkat, MOLT-4, and MAVER-1 cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). 293T cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% FBS and glutaMAX (GIBCO, USA). NK-92 cells were grown in α-minimum essential medium supplemented with 0.2 mM inositol, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.02 mM folic acid, 200 U/ml recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2), 12.5% horse serum, and 12.5% FBS. MV4-11 cells were grown in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) supplemented with 10% FBS. Primary patients’ bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) were seeded in IMDM supplemented with 15% FBS, 100 ng/ml rhFLT3-L, 100 ng/ml rhSCF, and 50 ng/ml rhTPO. Primary normal T cells were isolated and cultured as previously described [36].

Establishment of stable cell lines

Jurkat cells were infected with lentivirus carrying pLV-luciferase-neo plasmid, which was kindly provided by Dr. Rong Xiang (Medical School of Nankai University, Tianjin, China), followed by clonal selection using 600 μg/ml G418 to generate stable polyclonal cells overexpressing firefly luciferase (Jurkat-luc2).

NK-92 cells were infected with lentivirus carrying BB.z CAR plasmid, 2B4.z CAR plasmid, or empty vector, followed by sorting of GFP and F (ab’)2-positive cells by flow cytometry to generate polyclonal cells stably expressing BB.z CAR (BB.z-NK), 2B4.z CAR (2B4.z-NK), or VEC-NK cells.

Cell proliferation assay

We seeded 1.5 × 104 NK cells in 96-well plates per well. After 24 h, 48 h, or 72 h incubation, cell activity was tested by applying Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Apoptosis assay

We then harvested 5 × 105 NK cells and stained with Annexin V-Alexa Fluor® 647 and PI (Biolegend, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions and then subjected cells to flow cytometry analysis (BD LSRFortessa, USA).

In vitro function studies of CAR-NK cells

Jurkat, MOLT-4, and MAVER-1 cells were used as CD5+ target cells and MV4-11 cells were used as CD5− target cells. Three donors’ normal T cells were used as target cells to evaluate the side effects of CAR-NK cells.

BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK cells were used as effector cells and VEC-NK cells as controls.

Analysis of direct cytotoxicity

BB.z-NK, 2B4.z-NK, or VEC-NK cells were incubated with target cells at E:T ratios of 4:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, or 1:8. After 6 h, the cell mixture was harvested and stained with APC-conjugated anti-human CD5 antibody and PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-human CD56 antibody (Biolegend, USA) for 30 min at 4 °C, and then washed and resuspended in PBS for flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of CD56−CD5+ cells represented the residual level of target cells.

Cytokine releasing assay

BB.z-NK, 2B4.z-NK, or VEC-NK cells were cocultured with target cells at E:T ratios of 1:1 for 12 h. The supernatant of the cocultured system was harvested. Expression levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α were detected using an ELISA kit (R&D, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Degranulation assay

We cocultured 0.5 × 105 BB.z-NK, 2B4.z-NK, or VEC-NK cells with 1.5 × 105 target cells in 200 μl of NK-92 cultured medium with PE-conjugated anti-CD107a antibody (Biolegend, USA). After 1 h, 100 μg/ml monensin (BD Biosciences) was added to the cocultured system and incubated for 4 h, and then the cells were labeled with PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-human CD56 antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry. All CD56+ CD107a+ cells were regarded as degranulated NK cells.

Detection of NK cell activation markers

BB.z-NK, 2B4.z-NK, or VEC-NK cells were incubated with MAVER-1 cells at E:T ratios of 1:1. After 6 h, cells were harvested and stained with PE-conjugated anti-human CD69 antibody, APC-Cy7-conjugated anti-human HLA-DR antibody, and PE-conjugated anti-human NKG2D antibody (Biolegend, USA) for 30 min at 4 °C, and then washed and resuspended in PBS for flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of CD56+CD69+, CD56+HLA-DR+, or CD56+NKG2D+ cells represented the activated NK cells.

In vivo NSG murine studies

Eight-week-old NSG female mice were purchased from the Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences (CAMS&PUMC, China). All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Peking Union Medical College.

Twenty-four mice were intravenously inoculated with 3 × 106 Jurkat-luc2 cells. Nine days after transplantation, mice were randomly divided into four treatment groups according to the average radiance of bioluminescent imaging: group PBS, group VEC-NK, group BB.z-NK, and group 2B4.z-NK. Mice were intravenously administered PBS or 5 × 106 cells of either VEC-NK, BB.z-NK, or 2B4.z-NK cells at day 10, day 20, and day 26. Bioluminescent images were obtained using Caliper IVIS Lumina II (Caliper Life Sciences, USA), and the average radiance was calculated as described before [37].

Statistical analyses

Values were expressed as the mean ± S.D. If not specifically mentioned, the statistical significance of data was assessed by an unpaired two-tailed t-test. A value of p < 0.05 was used as the standard for statistical significance.

Results

Construction of CD5 CAR and preparation of CAR-NK cells

To improve the cytotoxicity of CAR-NK cells against CD5+ hematologic malignant cells, two second-generation CARs with different costimulatory domains were generated, one with T-cell-associated costimulatory domain 4-1BB, referred to as BB.z, and the other with NK-cell-associated costimulatory domain 2B4, referred to as 2B4.z (Fig. 1a). NK-92 cells were infected with CAR structures lentivirus carrying CAR DNAs to generate CAR-NK cells. Then, CAR+GFP+ NK-92 cells were sorted and expended. To exclude the effects of infection efficiency and expression intensity of BB.z and 2B4.z on NK-92 cells, CAR-NKs with similar specific fluorescence intensity (SFI) were prepared (Fig. 1b, c). Surprisingly, after sorting GFP+CAR+ NK cells, rapid proliferation was found in 2B4.z-NK cells, which was confirmed by CCK-8 assay (Fig. 1d). Moreover, the 2B4 costimulatory domain attenuated the background level of apoptosis in 2B4.z-NK cells (Fig. 1e, f).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Construction of CD5 CAR and preparation of CAR-NK cells. a Schematic diagram of lentiviral CAR expression plasmids. b Representative flow cytometry analysis showing the expression of CARs on NK-92 cells. c SFI of F (ab’)2 on VEC-NK, BB.z-NK, and 2B4.z-NK cells (n = 3; n.s., no significance). d CCK8 assay of cell proliferation in VEC-NK, BB.z-NK, and 2B4.z-NK cells (n = 3; ***p < 0.001). e Representative flow cytometry analysis showing basal apoptosis of VEC-NK, BB.z-NK, and 2B4.z-NK cells. f Quantification and statistical analysis of the data in e (n = 3; *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; n.s., no significance). VEC: VEC-NK; BB.z: BB.z-NK; 2B4.z: 2B4.z-NK

Full size image

2B4.z-NK cells display superior anti-CD5+ hematologic malignant cell activity in vitro

To evaluate the cytotoxic effect of BB.z-NK, four target cells were used. MV4-11 cells were used as a negative control as they possess nearly no expression of CD5, while Jurkat, MOLT-4, and MAVER-1 cells were used as positive target cells with the proportion of CD5 positivity above 95% (Fig. 2a, b). The degranulation assay was used to detect the production of cytotoxic granules from NK cells and quantified by the expression level of CD107a [38]. After 5 h of coculture with MV4-11, no obvious degranulation was found in CAR-NKs or VEC-NK cells. When cocultured with CD5+ target cells, CD107a-positive cells were significantly increased in CAR-NK cells compared to VEC-NK. Encouragingly, 2B4.z-NK cells showed a remarkably higher percentage of CD107a-positive cells than BB.z-NK (Fig. 2c, d). In addition, CD69 [39], HLA-DR [40, 41], and NKG2D [42] are considered as activation markers of NK cells [43], and thus, the expression level of these three markers was assessed. The expression of these three activation markers on VEC-NK, BB.z-NK, and 2B4.z-NK cells remained at similar levels, without stimulation with CD5+ MAVER-1 target cells. After co-incubation with MAVER-1 cells, a moderate but significant increase in CD69 and HLA-DR expression on BB.z-NK cells was induced, while a dramatic increase in CD69, HLA-DR, and NKG2D expression on the surface of 2B4.z-NK cells was observed (Fig. 2e, f). Furthermore, IFN-γ [33, 44] and TNF-α [34], important cytokines for tumor surveillance and for inducing the activation of T cells and macrophages, are produced predominantly by NK cells and functionally linked to the cytotoxic activities of NK cells. Therefore, both IFN-γ and TNF-α cytokines were detected, revealing that CAR-NK cells could specifically secrete cytokines when cocultured with CD5+ cells and that the cytokines released by 2B4.z-NK cells were significantly higher than those released by BB.z-NK (Fig. 2g, h). Finally, the true lytic capability of CAR-NKs was evaluated by residual target cells, demonstrating that CAR-NKs could eliminate CD5+ malignant cells at a low E:T ratio (1:8) and that the cytotoxic capability of CAR-NK cells was significantly augmented by the 2B4 costimulatory domain (Fig. 2i). In brief, 2B4.z-NK cells exhibited higher cytotoxic activity towards CD5+ hematologic malignant cells than BB.z-NK cells in vitro.

Fig. 2
figure 2

2B4.z-NK cells display superior anti-CD5+ hematologic malignant cell activity in vitro. a Representative flow cytometry analysis showing the expression of CD5 on MV4-11, Jurkat, MOLT-4, and MAVER-1 cells. b SFI (left panel) and proportion (right panel) of CD5 on MV4-11, Jurkat, MOLT-4, and MAVER-1 cells. c Representative flow cytometry analysis showing the proportion of CD107a+CD56+ cells after co-incubation with target cells as E:T = 1:3 for 5 h. d Quantification and statistical analysis of the data in c (n = 3; *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001). e Representative flow cytometry analysis showing the expression of CD69+ (left panel), HLA-DR+ (middle panel), and NKG2D+ (right panel) cells in CD56+ cells after co-incubation with (stimulated) or without (Ctrl) MAVER-1 target cells for 6 h. f Quantification and statistical analysis of the data in e (n = 3; ***p < 0.001; n.s., no significance). g ELISA data showing the release of IFN-γ by NK cells after co-incubation with target cells for 12 h (n = 3; ***p < 0.001). h ELISA data showing the release of TNF-α by NK cells after co-incubation with target cells for 12 h (n = 3; ***p < 0.001). i Direct lysis of NK cells against target cells. Effector cells and target cells were co-incubated for 6 h at the indicated E:T ratio. Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of CD5+CD56− cells (n = 3; two-way ANOVA; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). VEC: VEC-NK; BB.z: BB.z-NK; 2B4.z: 2B4.z-NK

Full size image

2B4.z-NK cells exhibit cytotoxic activity against primary CD5+ hematologic malignant cells ex vivo

To further verify the cytotoxicity of 2B4.z-NK cells, seven patients’ primary CD5+ hematologic malignant cells were used in the study. CD5 expression on these primary hematologic malignant cells was analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 3a and Table 1). The median proportion of CD5-positive cells was about 88.9% (range 71.60–98.50%). Higher expression of CD107a (Fig. 3b, c), more IFN-γ (Fig. 3d) and TNF-α (Fig. 3e) release, and stronger specific cytotoxicity (Fig. 3f) were observed in 2B4.z-NK cells cocultured with CD5+ hematologic malignant cells. The results indicated that 2B4.z-NK cells were capable of recognizing CD5+ primary hematologic malignant cells and exhibited greater cytotoxicity efficacy than BB.z-NK cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

2B4.z-NK cells exhibit predominant cytotoxic activity against primary CD5+ hematologic malignant cells ex vivo. a Flow cytometry analysis showing the expression of CD5 on patients’ BMMNCs. b Representative flow cytometry analysis showing the proportion of CD107a+CD56+ cells after co-incubation with target cells as E:T = 1:3 for 5 h. c Quantification and statistical analysis of the data in b (n = 7; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). d ELISA data showing the release of IFN-γ by NK cells after co-incubation with target cells for 12 h (n = 7; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). e ELISA data showing the release of TNF-α by NK cells after co-incubation with target cells for 12 h (n = 7; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). f Direct lysis of NK cells against target cells. Effector cells and target cells were co-incubated for 6 h at the indicated E:T ratio. Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of CD5+CD56− cells (left panel) and quantification and statistical analysis of residual cells (right panel) (n = 7; ***p < 0.001).VEC: VEC-NK; BB.z: BB.z-NK; 2B4.z: 2B4.z-NK

Full size image
Table 1 Patients information
Full size table

2B4.z-NK cells have stronger anti-T-ALL activity in vivo

To further the potential therapeutic application of 2B4.z-NK cells, their antitumor activities were investigated in a mouse model. A Jurkat cell line expressing firefly luciferase (Jurkat-luc2) was established, which showed a strong positive correlation (r2 = 0.9934) between firefly luciferase activity and cell numbers (Fig. 4a). Then, 3 × 106 Jurkat-luc2 cells were systemically engrafted into immunocompromised NSG mice by intravenous inoculation. At days 10, 20, and 26 after transplantation, PBS or 5 × 106 cells of either VEC-NK, BB.z-NK, or 2B4.z-NK cells were intravenously administered (Fig. 4b). Bioluminescence imaging was used to monitor Jurkat-luc2 cell growth (Fig. 4c). Compared with the mice treated with PBS or VEC-NK cells, Jurkat-luc2 cells were obviously suppressed in mice by CAR-NK cells treatment, especially in mice treated with 2B4.z-NK cells (Fig. 4d) as revealed by the decreased intensity of bioluminescence. The body weight of the mice indicated to some extent the state of disease progression. Twenty-four days after transplantation, the body weight of mice in the PBS and VEC-NK groups began to sharply decline until the death of the mice, while that of the BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK groups decreased steadily and slowly (Fig. 4e). Median survival times of the PBS, VEC-NK, BB.z-NK, and 2B4.z groups were 38.5 days, 39.5 days, 45.5 days, and 58.5 days (Fig. 4f), respectively, which was significantly extended in the CAR-NK groups. Among the CAR-NK groups, mice in the 2B4.z-NK group showed an even longer survival time compared to that of the BB.z-NK group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the survival time between the PBS group and the VEC-NK group (p = 0.8342). All transplanted mice developed aggressive T-ALL with extensive infiltrations of Jurkat-luc2 cells in bone marrow, spleen, and liver, which was confirmed by flow cytometry (Fig. 4g) and pathological analysis (Fig. 4h).

Fig. 4
figure 4

2B4.z-NK cells show stronger anti-T-ALL activity in vivo. a Jurkat-luc2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 1.6 × 106, 4 × 105, 1 × 105, and 2.5 × 104, 1.5 μl of 10 mg/ml D-Luciferin was added per well, and then bioluminescent images were obtained by using Caliper IVIS Lumina II. Left panel: representative bioluminescence images of Jurkat-luc2 cells; right panel: correlation analysis of bioluminescence signals and cell numbers (goodness of fit; r2 = 0.9935; p = 0.0033; N, number). b Schematic diagram of the treatment regimen. Mice were intravenously injected with 3 × 106 Jurkat-luc2 cells. Nine days after transplantation, mice were divided into four treatment groups according to the average radiance of the bioluminescent imaging: group PBS, group VEC-NK, group BB.z-NK, and group 2B4.z-NK. Mice were respectively intravenously administered with PBS, 5 × 106 cells of either VEC-NK, BB.z-NK, or 2B4.z-NK cells at day 10, day 20, and day 26. c Statistical analysis of the bioluminescence intensity of each treatment group measured at different days (n = 6; two-way ANOVA; *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; n.s., no significance). d Representative bioluminescence images of mice. e Body weight of each treatment group measured at different days (n = 6; two-way ANOVA; *p < 0.05; n.s., no significance). f Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mice (n = 6; log-rank test; *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001;). g Representative flow cytometry analysis showing the proportion of CD45+CD5+ leukemia blasts in bone marrow, spleen, and liver of NSG mice. h Representative H&E staining of bone marrow, spleen, and liver of NSG mice.VEC: VEC-NK; BB.z: BB.z-NK; 2B4.z: 2B4.z-NK

Full size image

Both BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK have side effects on CD5+ normal T cells

Finally, the side effects of CD5 CAR-NK on normal T cells were evaluated. In addition to expression on the surface of hematologic malignant cells, CD5 is also expressed on normal T cells [45]. Thus, three donors’ normal T cells were used for coculture with CD5 CAR-NK cells. First, the expression of CD5 on normal T cells was tested; the positive rate was above 99% (Fig. 5a). Then, T cells were co-incubated with VEC-NK, BB.z-NK, or 2B4.z-NK. The proportion of CD107a-positive cells was increased in both CAR-NK cells, while 2B4.z-NK cells showed more production of cytotoxic granules (Fig. 5b, c). CAR-NK cells, especially 2B4.z-NK cells, released a greater level of IFN-γ (Fig. 5d) and TNF-α (Fig. 5e) in the supernatant of the cocultured system. In addition, a true lysis assay of CAR-NK cells was performed, demonstrating that BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK had a similar cytotoxic ability against normal T cells (Fig. 5f and Additional file 1: Figure S1). Since the normal target T cells used for the above cytotoxic assay were activated by Human T-Activator CD3/CD28 Dynabeads and rhIL-2, these activated T cells proliferated rapidly, which might have obscured the true killing effect of 2B4.z-NK. Therefore, to exclude the effect of rapid proliferation of activated T cells on the CAR-NK killing effect, we further performed the true lysis assay using un-activated normal T cells as target cells and showed that the cytotoxicity of 2B4.z-NK cells against normal T cells was significantly higher than that of BB.z-NK (Fig. 5g).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Both BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK present side effects on CD5+ normal T cells. a Flow cytometry analysis showing the proportion of CD5+ cells in donors’ normal T cells. b Representative flow cytometry analysis showing the proportion of CD107a+CD56+ cells after co-incubation with activated normal T cells as E:T = 1:3 for 5 h. c Quantification and statistical analysis of the data in b (n = 3; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). d ELISA data showing the release of IFN-γ by NK cells after co-incubation with activated normal T cells for 12 h (n = 3; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). e ELISA data showing the release of TNF-α by NK cells after co-incubation with activated normal T cells for 12 h (n = 3; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). f Direct cytotoxicity of CAR-NK against activated normal T cells. Activated normal T cells and CAR-NK cells or VEC-NK cells were cocultured for 6 h at the indicated E:T ratio. Flow cytometry analysis of the proportion of CD5+CD56− cells (n = 3; n.s., no significance). g Direct cytotoxicity of CAR-NK against un-activated normal T cells. Un-activated normal T cells and CAR-NK cells or VEC-NK cells were cocultured for 6 h at the E:T ratio of 1:1. Flow cytometry analysis of the proportion of CD5+CD56− cells (n = 3; ***p < 0.001). VEC: VEC-NK; BB.z: BB.z-NK; 2B4.z: 2B4.z-NK

Full size image

Discussion

T cell malignancies are aggressive hematological tumors with limited treatment strategies and dismal prognoses. To develop a CD19 CAR-T cell strategy for B cell malignancies, we investigated whether CAR engineered immune cells could exhibit a cytotoxic ability towards CD5+ T cell malignancies. Treatment of T cell malignancies using CD5 CAR-T cells remains limited due to the shared antigens between malignant T cells and normal T cells, causing the fratricide of CD5 CAR-T cells themselves. Recently, another important type of immune cell, the NK-92 cell, has been utilized as a CAR-modified immune cell. However, in preclinical models, CAR-T cells seem to be superior to CAR-NK-92 cells [7]. Therefore, we modified the CAR structure to improve the cytotoxic ability of CAR-NK cells.

In studies of CAR-T cells, the costimulatory domain has been considered an important factor that strongly affects the curative effect of CAR-T cells [9]. To date, nearly all engineered CAR-NK cells used the intracellular domain of T cell-associated costimulatory factors as the costimulatory structural module of CAR. Several studies constructed second-generation CARs with CD28 [43, 46] or 4-1BB (Clinical trial: NCT01974479 and NCT01974479) costimulatory domains, while others used third-generation CARs with both the CD28 and 4-1BB costimulatory domain [15, 47, 48]. At the beginning of our study, 4-1BB was used as a costimulatory domain of CAR, which has been proven effective in generating CAR-T cells to target CD20- [36], CD33- [35], and FLT-3-positive [49] malignant cells. The CD5 BB.z-NK cells in our preliminary study showed a good true killing ability against target cells (E:T = 1:1, 12 h), while the degranulation of BB.z-NK cells was not very obvious and the secretion of TNF-α was very low. This may due to the unsuitable function of 4-1BB in NK cells. Wilcox et al. reported that when they treated mice with 4-1BB ligand or anti-4-1BB agonistic antibody, proliferation was induced in NK cells and IFN-γ secretion increased alongside NK cell helper function, but the cytotoxic ability of NK cells was not augmented [50]. Several in vivo xenograft model studies have demonstrated that triggering the 4-1BB signaling of NK cells by treatment of mice with anti-4-1BB activating antibody [51] or interaction with 4-1BBL-positive γδT cells [52] would enhance NK-cell-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) through the activation of the 4-1BB downstream signaling pathway. In contrast, the 4-1BB-4-1BBL interaction can attenuate the activity of NK cells in the human leukemia micro-environment. Several studies reported that 35% (23/65) of patients with acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) [53] and 32% (28/89) of patients with B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) [54] expressed a high level of 4-1BB ligand, and at the same time, almost all NK cells in these patients expressed 4-1BB. When 4-1BB ligand-positive AML cells interacted with 4-1BB on allogeneic NK cells, cytotoxicity and IFN-γ release were reduced, but this could be restored by 4-1BB blocking antibody [53]. When 4-1BB ligand-positive B-CLL cells interacted with 4-1BB on Rituximab-induced NK cells, ADCC was reduced [54]. These results are completely in opposition to those observed in T cells, where the interaction between 4-1BB and 4-1BB ligand would enhance the cytotoxic ability of human T cells against AML cells [55].

The different effects of 4-1BB between human NK and mouse NK cells, and between human NK and human T cells may be due to the different downstream signaling pathways induced by 4-1BB in these cells. The adaptor proteins TNF receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) and TRAF2 will bind with the intracellular domain of 4-1BB (whether murine or human) after 4-1BB triggering [56], inducing the activation of the NF-κB, JNK, and p38 signaling pathway and leading to the activation of T or NK cells [57]. Because there are differences in several amino acids in the intracellular domain of human 4-1BB and murine 4-1BB, human 4-1BB can interact with another adaptor protein, TRAF3, whereas murine 4-1BB cannot [58]. When TRAF3 and TRAF2 form heterotrimers, they can inhibit NF-κB activation [59]. Therefore, the interaction between the 4-1BB costimulatory domain and the negative regulator-TRAF3 may result in the limited activation (low expression of CD107a and little releasing of TNF-α) of BB.z-NK, and thus, the downstream signaling pathway of NF-κB will be weakened.

In this study, we attempted to improve the cytotoxic ability of CD5 CAR-NK by changing the costimulatory domain of CAR. 2B4 is a member of the signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM)-related receptor family, which contain four immune-receptor tyrosine-based switch motifs (ITSMs) in their intracellular domain and perform important roles in regulating the reactivity of multiple immune cells [60]. The ligand of 2B4 is CD48, which is a glycoprotein-I (GPI)-anchored Ig-like protein that can be found in nearly all hematologic cells including NK cells [61]. Triggering 2B4 via interaction with CD48 can induce the phosphorylation of ITSMs, causing the recruitment of the adapter protein SLAM-associated protein (SAP) and EWS-Fli1-activated transcript 2 (EAT-2) [62]. SAP can recruit Src-family kinase Fyn [63], which then transduces downstream signals by phosphorylating phospholipase C-γ (PLC-γ) or Vav-1 [64], activating ERK, inducing the cytotoxicity of NK cells and producing the pro-inflammatory factors-IFN-γ and TNF-α. EAT-2 can link 2B4 to PLC-γ and ERK to mediate the activation of NK cells and accelerate the polarization and secretion of cytotoxic granules [65]. In one study of CAR-NK that used the 2B4 intracellular domain as the costimulatory domain, phosphorylation of PLC-γ, Vav-1, and ERK was promoted in NK cells [14]. It was revealed that the 2B4 intracellular domain may be more suitable as a costimulatory domain in CAR-NK cells than that of 4-1BB.

Therefore, in our study, we used the 2B4 intracellular domain as the costimulatory domain to replace the 4-1BB intracellular domain in the CAR structure and compared the cytotoxic ability of BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK towards CD5+ T-malignant cells. The results showed that 2B4.z-NK released more cytotoxic granules, expressed higher NK cell activation markers (CD69, NKG2D, and HLA-DR), secreted more of the inflammatory factors IFN-γ and TNF-α, and exhibited stronger true cytotoxicity than BB.z-NK after coculture with CD5+ cell lines and primary hematologic malignant cells in vitro. Moreover, 2B4.z-NK cells exhibited predominant cytotoxic activity on T-ALL bearing mice in vivo and significantly prolonged the survival of mice versus BB.z-NK.

In addition, CD5 is expressed in almost all normal T cells and some mature B cells [66]; thus, the side effects of CD5 CAR-NK were evaluated. The results showed that both BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK exhibited cell lysis properties, a side effect towards normal T cells (Fig. 5), while 2B4.z-NK revealed significantly higher cytotoxicity on normal T cells than BB.Z-NK cells, similar to their role in T cell malignancies. It is indicated that CD5 CARs targeting T cell malignancies will induce T cell aplasia similar to the B cell aplasia observed in patients treated with CD19 CAR-T cells. B cell aplasia is more resistant and can be relieved by immunoglobulin infusions [67]. Long-term T cell aplasia increases the probability of infection in patients [68]. Although 2B4.z-NK showed a stronger side effect towards normal T cells, the long-term T cell aplasia may be prevented by using short-lived CAR-NK cells or by bridging allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after complete remission [7]. In our treatment strategy, the NK-92 cell line was used as the effector cells. For further clinical trial studies, 2B4.z-NK cells must be irradiated before transfusion into patients to prevent potential carcinogenicity. The process of irradiation will lead to the short-survival of 2B4.z-NK in patients, which can shorten the period of T cell aplasia in patients but may reduce treatment outcomes as well. To address this duality, multiple injections may be effective at prolonging the persistence of 2B4.z-NK cells in patients and augmenting the curative effect.

Conclusions

CD5 CAR-NK cells, especially those constructed with the intracellular domain of NK-cell-associated activated receptor-2B4, exhibited specific cytotoxic properties against CD5+ malignant cells in vitro and remarkably prolonged the survival of T-ALL xenograft mice in vivo. 2B4.z-NK could be a potential immunotherapy strategy for T cell malignancy treatment.

Abbreviations

ADCC:

Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity

ALL:

T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AML:

Acute myelocytic leukemia

B-CLL:

B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia

BMMNCs:

Bone marrow mononuclear cells

CAR:

Chimeric antigen receptor

CD5+ B-CLPDs unclassified:

Unclassified CD5+ B cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders

CLL:

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

CTCL:

Cutaneous T cell lymphoma

EAT2:

EWS-Fli1-activated transcript 2

ITSM:

Immune-receptor tyrosine-based switch motif

MCL:

Mantle cell lymphoma

NK:

Natural killer

SAP:

SLAM-associated protein

scFv:

Single-chain variable fragment

SLAM:

Signaling lymphocytic activation molecule

TCLs:

T cell lymphomas

TRAF:

TNF receptor-associated factor

References

  1. Hof J, Krentz S, van Schewick C, Korner G, Shalapour S, Rhein P, et al. Mutations and deletions of the TP53 gene predict nonresponse to treatment and poor outcome in first relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(23):3185–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abel GA, Bertrand KA, Earle CC, Laden F. Outcomes for lymphoid malignancies in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) as compared to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. Hematol Oncol. 2010;28(3):133–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chihara D, Fanale MA, Miranda RN, Noorani M, Westin JR, Nastoupil LJ, et al. The survival outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2017;176(5):750–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kota VK, Hathaway AR, Shah BD, Peker D, Zhang L, Jaye DL, et al. Poor outcomes with hyper CVAD induction for T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Blood. 2015;126(23):3762.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, Lekakis LJ, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(26):2531–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, Rives S, Boyer M, Bittencourt H, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):439–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alcantara M, Tesio M, June CH, Houot R. CAR T-cells for T-cell malignancies: challenges in distinguishing between therapeutic, normal, and neoplastic T-cells. Leukemia. 2018;32(11):2307–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mamonkin M, Rouce RH, Tashiro H, Brenner MK. A T-cell-directed chimeric antigen receptor for the selective treatment of T-cell malignancies. Blood. 2015;126(8):983–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guedan S, Posey AD Jr, Shaw C, Wing A, Da T, Patel PR, et al. Enhancing CAR T cell persistence through ICOS and 4-1BB costimulation. JCI Insight. 2018;3(1)e96976.

  10. Marks DI, Paietta EM, Moorman AV, Richards SM, Buck G, DeWald G, et al. T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: clinical features, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and outcome from the large randomized prospective trial (UKALL XII/ECOG 2993). Blood. 2009;114(25):5136–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunger SP, Mullighan CG. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(16):1541–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brada M, Mizutani S, Molgaard H, Sloane JP, Treleaven J, Horwich A, et al. Circulating lymphoma cells in patients with B & T non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma detected by immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangement. Br J Cancer. 1987;56(2):147–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruella M, Xu J, Barrett DM, Fraietta JA, Reich TJ, Ambrose DE, et al. Induction of resistance to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy by transduction of a single leukemic B cell. Nat Med. 2018;24(10):1499–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y, Hermanson DL, Moriarity BS, Kaufman DS. Human iPSC-derived natural killer cells engineered with chimeric antigen receptors enhance anti-tumor activity. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(2):181–92 e5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen KH, Wada M, Pinz KG, Liu H, Lin KW, Jares A, et al. Preclinical targeting of aggressive T-cell malignancies using anti-CD5 chimeric antigen receptor. Leukemia. 2017;31(10):2151–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Simonetta F, Alvarez M, Negrin RS. Natural killer cells in graft-versus-host-disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Front Immunol. 2017;8:465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klingemann H, Boissel L, Toneguzzo F. Natural killer cells for immunotherapy - advantages of the NK-92 cell line over blood NK cells. Front Immunol. 2016;7:91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boyiadzis M, Agha M, Redner RL, Sehgal A, Im A, Hou JZ, et al. Phase 1 clinical trial of adoptive immunotherapy using “off-the-shelf” activated natural killer cells in patients with refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Cytotherapy. 2017;19(10):1225–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams BA, Law AD, Routy B, denHollander N, Gupta V, Wang XH, et al. A phase I trial of NK-92 cells for refractory hematological malignancies relapsing after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation shows safety and evidence of efficacy. Oncotarget. 2017;8(51):89256–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Voisinne G, Gonzalez de Peredo A, Roncagalli R. CD5, an undercover regulator of TCR signaling. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bamberger M, Santos AM, Goncalves CM, Oliveira MI, James JR, Moreira A, et al. A new pathway of CD5 glycoprotein-mediated T cell inhibition dependent on inhibitory phosphorylation of Fyn kinase. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(35):30324–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perez-Villar JJ, Whitney GS, Bowen MA, Hewgill DH, Aruffo AA, Kanner SB. CD5 negatively regulates the T-cell antigen receptor signal transduction pathway: involvement of SH2-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase SHP-1. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(4):2903–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gary-Gouy H, Sainz-Perez A, Marteau JB, Marfaing-Koka A, Delic J, Merle-Beral H, et al. Natural phosphorylation of CD5 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells and analysis of CD5-regulated genes in a B cell line suggest a role for CD5 in malignant phenotype. J Immunol. 2007;179(7):4335–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Freitas CMT, Johnson DK, Weber KS. T cell calcium signaling regulation by the co-receptor CD5. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(5):1295.

  25. Pui CH, Behm FG, Crist WM. Clinical and biologic relevance of immunologic marker studies in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1993;82(2):343–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Campana D, van Dongen JJ, Mehta A, Coustan-Smith E, Wolvers-Tettero IL, Ganeshaguru K, et al. Stages of T-cell receptor protein expression in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1991;77(7):1546–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang H, Li Z, Huang C, Rao J, Xie Q, Cui W, et al. CD5 and CD43 expression are associate with poor prognosis in DLBCL patients. Open Med (Wars). 2018;13:605–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Friedman DR, Guadalupe E, Volkheimer A, Moore JO, Weinberg JB. Clinical outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia associated with expression of CD5, a negative regulator of B-cell receptor signalling. Br J Haematol. 2018;183(5):747–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dillman RO, Shawler DL, Dillman JB, Royston I. Therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with T101 monoclonal antibody. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2(8):881–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Foss FM, Raubitscheck A, Mulshine JL, Fleisher TA, Reynolds JC, Paik CH, et al. Phase I study of the pharmacokinetics of a radioimmunoconjugate, 90Y-T101, in patients with CD5-expressing leukemia and lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4(11):2691–700.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sadelain M, Brentjens R, Riviere I. The basic principles of chimeric antigen receptor design. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(4):388–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. van der Stegen SJ, Hamieh M, Sadelain M. The pharmacology of second-generation chimeric antigen receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14(7):499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ma J, Chen T, Mandelin J, Ceponis A, Miller NE, Hukkanen M, et al. Regulation of macrophage activation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003;60(11):2334–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang R, Jaw JJ, Stutzman NC, Zou Z, Sun PD. Natural killer cell-produced IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha induce target cell cytolysis through up-regulation of ICAM-1. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;91(2):299–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li S, Tao Z, Xu Y, Liu J, An N, Wang Y, et al. CD33-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells with different co-stimulators showed potent anti-leukemia efficacy and different phenotype. Hum Gene Ther. 2018;29(5):626–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu Y, Li S, Wang Y, Liu J, Mao X, Xing H, et al. Induced CD20 expression on B-cell malignant cells heightened the cytotoxic activity of chimeric antigen receptor engineered T cells. Hum Gene Ther. 2019;30(4):497–510.

  37. Xu Y, Dong X, Qi P, Ye Y, Shen W, Leng L, et al. Sox2 communicates with Tregs through CCL1 to promote the Stemness property of breast Cancer cells. Stem Cells. 2017;35(12):2351–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Alter G, Malenfant JM, Altfeld M. CD107a as a functional marker for the identification of natural killer cell activity. J Immunol Methods. 2004;294(1–2):15–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Borrego F, Pena J, Solana R. Regulation of CD69 expression on human natural killer cells: differential involvement of protein kinase C and protein tyrosine kinases. Eur J Immunol. 1993;23(5):1039–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Phillips JH, Le AM, Lanier LL. Natural killer cells activated in a human mixed lymphocyte response culture identified by expression of Leu-11 and class II histocompatibility antigens. J Exp Med. 1984;159(4):993–1008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Spits H, Lanier LL. Natural killer or dendritic: what’s in a name? Immunity. 2007;26(1):11–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mistry AR, O'Callaghan CA. Regulation of ligands for the activating receptor NKG2D. Immunology. 2007;121(4):439–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Chu J, Deng Y, Benson DM, He S, Hughes T, Zhang J, et al. CS1-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered natural killer cells enhance in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity against human multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2014;28(4):917–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Martin-Fontecha A, Thomsen LL, Brett S, Gerard C, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A, et al. Induced recruitment of NK cells to lymph nodes provides IFN-gamma for T(H)1 priming. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(12):1260–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Azzam HS, Grinberg A, Lui K, Shen H, Shores EW, Love PE. CD5 expression is developmentally regulated by T cell receptor (TCR) signals and TCR avidity. J Exp Med. 1998;188(12):2301–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gomes-Silva D, Srinivasan M, Sharma S, Lee CM, Wagner DL, Davis TH, et al. CD7-edited T cells expressing a CD7-specific CAR for the therapy of T-cell malignancies. Blood. 2017;130(3):285–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. You F, Wang Y, Jiang L, Zhu X, Chen D, Yuan L, et al. A novel CD7 chimeric antigen receptor-modified NK-92MI cell line targeting T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9(1):64–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen KH, Wada M, Firor AE, Pinz KG, Jares A, Liu H, et al. Novel anti-CD3 chimeric antigen receptor targeting of aggressive T cell malignancies. Oncotarget. 2016;7(35):56219–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang Y, Xu Y, Li S, Liu J, Xing Y, Xing H, et al. Targeting FLT3 in acute myeloid leukemia using ligand-based chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wilcox RA, Tamada K, Strome SE, Chen L. Signaling through NK cell-associated CD137 promotes both helper function for CD8+ cytolytic T cells and responsiveness to IL-2 but not cytolytic activity. J Immunol. 2002;169(8):4230–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kohrt HE, Houot R, Weiskopf K, Goldstein MJ, Scheeren F, Czerwinski D, et al. Stimulation of natural killer cells with a CD137-specific antibody enhances trastuzumab efficacy in xenotransplant models of breast cancer. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(3):1066–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Maniar A, Zhang X, Lin W, Gastman BR, Pauza CD, Strome SE, et al. Human gammadelta T lymphocytes induce robust NK cell-mediated antitumor cytotoxicity through CD137 engagement. Blood. 2010;116(10):1726–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Baessler T, Charton JE, Schmiedel BJ, Grunebach F, Krusch M, Wacker A, et al. CD137 ligand mediates opposite effects in human and mouse NK cells and impairs NK-cell reactivity against human acute myeloid leukemia cells. Blood. 2010;115(15):3058–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Buechele C, Baessler T, Schmiedel BJ, Schumacher CE, Grosse-Hovest L, Rittig K, et al. 4-1BB ligand modulates direct and rituximab-induced NK-cell reactivity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(3):737–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Houtenbos I, Westers TM, Dijkhuis A, de Gruijl TD, Ossenkoppele GJ, van de Loosdrecht AA. Leukemia-specific T-cell reactivity induced by leukemic dendritic cells is augmented by 4-1BB targeting. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(1):307–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Arch RH, Thompson CB. 4-1BB and Ox40 are members of a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-nerve growth factor receptor subfamily that bind TNF receptor-associated factors and activate nuclear factor kappaB. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18(1):558–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Wang C, Lin GH, McPherson AJ, Watts TH. Immune regulation by 4-1BB and 4-1BBL: complexities and challenges. Immunol Rev. 2009;229(1):192–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Jang IK, Lee ZH, Kim YJ, Kim SH, Kwon BS. Human 4-1BB (CD137) signals are mediated by TRAF2 and activate nuclear factor-kappa B. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;242(3):613–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hacker H, Tseng PH, Karin M. Expanding TRAF function: TRAF3 as a tri-faced immune regulator. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(7):457–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Veillette A. SLAM-family receptors: immune regulators with or without SAP-family adaptors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(3):a002469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Brown MH, Boles K, van der Merwe PA, Kumar V, Mathew PA, Barclay AN. 2B4, the natural killer and T cell immunoglobulin superfamily surface protein, is a ligand for CD48. J Exp Med. 1998;188(11):2083–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Eissmann P, Beauchamp L, Wooters J, Tilton JC, Long EO, Watzl C. Molecular basis for positive and negative signaling by the natural killer cell receptor 2B4 (CD244). Blood. 2005;105(12):4722–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Ma CS, Nichols KE, Tangye SG. Regulation of cellular and humoral immune responses by the SLAM and SAP families of molecules. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:337–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Dong Z, Davidson D, Perez-Quintero LA, Kurosaki T, Swat W, Veillette A. The adaptor SAP controls NK cell activation by regulating the enzymes Vav-1 and SHIP-1 and by enhancing conjugates with target cells. Immunity. 2012;36(6):974–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Perez-Quintero LA, Roncagalli R, Guo H, Latour S, Davidson D, Veillette A. EAT-2, a SAP-like adaptor, controls NK cell activation through phospholipase Cgamma, Ca++, and Erk, leading to granule polarization. J Exp Med. 2014;211(4):727–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Fuda FS, Karandikar NJ, Chen W. Significant CD5 expression on normal stage 3 hematogones and mature B lymphocytes in bone marrow. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132(5):733–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Park JH, Riviere I, Gonen M, Wang X, Senechal B, Curran KJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of CD19 CAR therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):449–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Buckley RH, Schiff SE, Schiff RI, Markert L, Williams LW, Roberts JL, et al. Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for the treatment of severe combined immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(7):508–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81700163, 81830005, 81770181), National Key Research and Development Program for Precision Medicine (2017YFC0909800), Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81421002), CAMS Initiative Fund for Medical Sciences (2016-I2M-1-007, 2017-I2M-1-015), and PUMC Youth Fund and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2017310024).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yingxi Xu and Qian Liu are equal contributors

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China

    Yingxi Xu, Qian Liu, Mengjun Zhong, Zhenzhen Wang, Zhaoqi Chen, Yu Zhang, Haiyan Xing, Zheng Tian, Kejing Tang, Xiaolong Liao, Qing Rao, Min Wang & Jianxiang Wang

  2. National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China

    Jianxiang Wang

Authors
  1. Yingxi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mengjun Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhenzhen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhaoqi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Haiyan Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zheng Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kejing Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiaolong Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Qing Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Min Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jianxiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YXX and QL performed most of the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. MJZ, ZZW, ZQC, and YZ helped perform some of the experiments. XLL, HYX, and QR provided the study material. KJT and ZT supported administrative management. MW and JXW conceived and supervised the study and reviewed and approved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Min Wang or Jianxiang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Peripheral blood of healthy donors was obtained from the Tianjin Blood Center under the approval by the ethical advisory board of the Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital. All animal experiments were approved by the ethical advisory board of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Peking Union Medical College.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Both BB.z-NK and 2B4.z-NK present direct cytotoxicity on CD5+ normal T cells. (DOCX 728 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Liu, Q., Zhong, M. et al. 2B4 costimulatory domain enhancing cytotoxic ability of anti-CD5 chimeric antigen receptor engineered natural killer cells against T cell malignancies. J Hematol Oncol 12, 49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0732-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0732-7

Keywords

Journal of Hematology & Oncology

ISSN: 1756-8722

Contact us