Skip to main content
Download PDF

Nuclear factor of activated T-cells, NFATC1, governs FLT3ITD-driven hematopoietic stem cell transformation and a poor prognosis in AML

Journal of Hematology & Oncology volume 12, Article number: 72 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with a high allelic burden of an internal tandem duplication (ITD)-mutated FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase-3 (FLT3) have a dismal outcome. FLT3ITD triggers the proliferation of the quiescent hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) pool but fails to directly transform HSCs. While the inflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T-cells 2 (NFAT2, NFATC1) is overexpressed in AML, it is unknown whether it plays a role in FLT3ITD-induced HSC transformation.

Methods

We generated a triple transgenic mouse model, in which tamoxifen-inducible Cre-recombinase targets expression of a constitutively nuclear transcription factor NFATC1 to FLT3ITD positive HSC. Emerging genotypes were phenotypically, biochemically, and also transcriptionally characterized using RNA sequencing. We also retrospectively analyzed the overall survival of AML patients with different NFATC1 expression status.

Results

We find that NFATC1 governs FLT3ITD-driven precursor cell expansion and transformation, causing a fully penetrant lethal AML. FLT3ITD/NFATC1-AML is re-transplantable in secondary recipients and shows primary resistance to the FLT3ITD-kinase inhibitor quizartinib. Mechanistically, NFATC1 rewires FLT3ITD-dependent signaling output in HSC, involving augmented K-RAS signaling and a selective de novo recruitment of key HSC-transforming signaling pathways such as the Hedgehog- and WNT/B-Catenin signaling pathways. In human AML, NFATC1 overexpression is associated with poor overall survival.

Conclusions

NFATC1 expression causes FLT3ITD-induced transcriptome changes, which are associated with HSC transformation, quizartinib resistance, and a poor prognosis in AML.

Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is mainly a fatal disease. AML evolution usually begins with sentinel de novo acquisition of mutations in epigenetic modifier genes such as DNMT3A, ASXL1, or TET2, which also characterize clonal hematopoiesis of healthy individuals, referred to as CHIP or age-related clonal hematopoiesis, ARCH [1]. Progression from CHIP to AML is frequently associated by the consecutive acquisition of additional mutations such as in NPM1, RAS, KIT, or FLT3 [2]. However, recent evidence also shows that clonal evolution from CHIP to AML is not exactly a linear path [3]. In fact, the requirements, under which CHIP mutations become myeloid driver mutations, cooperate with other genetic or epigenetic changes to eventually cause AML, are not well understood. De novo chromatin alterations that are caused by aberrant transcription factor (TF) signaling could be very critical in this process [4]. One such TF is the nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT). NFATs are a family of TFs that are physiologically activated by the calcium-activated serine/threonine phosphatase calcineurin, which dephosphorylates NFAT, thereby leading to their nuclear translocation and target gene regulation [5]. NFAT proteins play a pivotal role during T-cell maturation and activation [6]. Aberrant NFAT signaling is causally involved in the development of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreatic cancer, and several other malignancies. We have previously shown that nuclear NFATC1-induced epigenetic changes convert benign Ras-induced pancreatic adenomas into rapidly lethal, metastatic cancers [7]. NFAT proteins are expressed in normal and malignant lymphatic hematopoiesis. We showed recently that NFATC1 is overexpressed in AML where it mediates resistance to sorafenib in vitro [8]. Sorafenib is a potent inhibitor of the mutated FLT3-receptor tyrosine kinase variant, FLT3ITD, which is frequently found in normal karyotype AML [2, 9]. FLT3ITD constitutively activates a signaling network, including the RAS- and STAT-signaling pathways. FLT3ITD confers a poor risk in AML [10, 11]. This provided the rationale for the development of FLT3-specific TKI in order to improve outcome. However, although FLT3-TKI therapy proved to be clinically effective, responses are usually temporary through the development of TKI resistance [12,13,14,15,16]. Notably, although FLT3ITD is a critical driver of AML pathogenesis and dictates prognosis, it fails to transform normal stem cells into self-renewing AML in vivo [17,18,19] unless other oncogenes are co-expressed [20, 21]. This is because FLT3 ITD-signaling causes overproliferation of normally quiescent stem cells, leading to stem cell depletion rather than leukemic transformation [22].

Here, we show for the first time that NFATC1, a key regulator of inflammatory responses [23], potently synergizes with FLT3ITD, by causing stem cell expansion rather stem cell depletion, resulting in the development of a FLT3-kinase inhibitor-resistant lethal AML. In human AML, overexpression of NFATC1 can be linked to a poor prognosis, supporting the critical importance of NFATC1 in AML biology.

Results

Nuclear NFATC1 induces a rapidly lethal FLT3ITD-driven leukemia

To address whether FLT3ITD synergizes with nuclear NFATC1 during FLT3ITD-driven AML transformation, we generated transgenic mice that constitutively express NFATC1 at the level of hematopoietic stem cells, along with Flt3ITD (Additional file 1: Figure S1). To this end, transgenic NFAT mice, harboring a hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged constitutively nuclear (c.n.) human NFATC1 cDNA under the control of a loxP–STOP–loxP cassette in the ROSA26 locus [7] were crossed with Cre-transgenic mice (Cre-ERT mice [24, 25]), in which tamoxifen-inducible Cre-ERT recombinase is expressed under the control of the stem cell leukemia (Scl ) enhancer (SCL-Cre-ERT) and transgenic Flt3ITD mice [19], thus targeting NFATC1 expression to Flt3ITD-positive hematopoietic stem cells. Flt3ITD (F) mice, Scl-Cre;Nfatc1 (CN) mice, and SCL-Cre;Nfatc1;Flt3ITD (FCN) mice were born at the expected Mendelian ratio. F, CN, and FCN mice were viable at birth. Expression of transgenic NFATC1 was confirmed in the blood of animals after tamoxifen induction (Fig. 1a). F mice showed normal survival with only mild myeloproliferative changes characterized by a slight hepatosplenomegaly through white blood cell infiltration (Fig. 1b–h), as reported previously [17,18,19]. Most CN mice had a normal life expectancy with no bone marrow or organ abnormalities. However, 30% of the CN mice died after a long latency (Fig. 1b) from a leukemia that resembled T-prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) (not shown). In contrast, all FCN mice developed a rapidly lethal myeloid leukemia. Their median survival was only four months and thus significantly shorter than that of F or CN strains (Fig. 1b). Compared to age-matched F, WT, or CN genotypes, FCN mice displayed a significant splenomegaly. The median spleen weight in FCN mice was 0.73 g (range, 0.52–0.83) and thus significantly higher than in F animals (median 0.2 g; range, 0.19–0.31) (Fig. 1c, d). When compared to F, WT, or CN mice, FCN mice also displayed a dramatically increased leukocytosis. When compared to CN and WT animals, F and FCN animals displayed thrombocytopenia and anemia (Fig. 1e–g). While bone marrow, spleen, and liver histologies of CN mice were unremarkable, F animals showed myeloproliferative changes in bone marrow and spleen, but only a mild leukemic liver infiltration (Fig. 1h). In contrast, bone marrow of FCN animals was characterized by a massively expanded immature hematopoiesis, monocytic infiltrates and suppressed erythro- and thrombopoiesis, destroying the physiological organ structure (Fig. 1h). Immunohistochemistry demonstrates that leukemic infiltrates in FCN animals show characteristic nuclear localization of NFATC1 (Fig. 1h). Together, constitutively active NFATc1 critically augments FLT3ITD-driven leukemogenesis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Development of AML in FCN mice. a WB of blood samples after erythrocyte lysis before and after induction of NFATc1 expression with tamoxifen treatment of mice. b Kaplan Meier survival curve of WT (n = 12), CN (n = 43), F (n = 33), FCN (n = 28); p < 0.0001. c, d Spleen weight (mean ± SD, n = 10 to 18 per group) (c), examples of spleens at 4 months (d). e, f Peripheral white blood counts (e) and platelet counts (f) over months 1 to 3 (mean ± SEM, n = 4 to 10 per group); p < 0.001. g Peripheral blood smears in F and FCN mice: left shifted hematopoiesis and increased white blood counts in FCN compared to F animals. Scale bars, 50 μm. h Bone marrow smears and IHC of bone marrow, histology of spleen and liver of WT, CN, F, and FCN mice. Black arrows highlight brownish cytoplasmic NFATC1 with sparing of blueish nuclear staining. Red arrows indicate nuclear NFATC1. Massive leukemic infiltrates cause a loss of normal tissue structure of spleen and liver in FCN. There are only minor tissue infiltrations in F and normal tissue structure in the CN animals. Bone marrow smears and the bone marrow histology of the FCN mice show increased cellularity, monomorphic infiltrates, as well as restricted erythro- and thrombopoiesis. FCN bone marrow shows stronger colorization and nuclear NFATC1 staining versus cytoplasmic staining patterns in the other genotypes. Scale bars, 100 μm. A Log-rank test (***p < 0.0001) or 1-way ANOVA (***p < 0.001) was used for p values

Full size image

NFATC1 increases FLT3ITD-dependent clonogenic cell mass through precursor and stem cell expansion

Immunophenotypic analysis of FCN leukemia from bone marrow (Fig. 2a–c) and spleen (Additional file 2: Figure S2) of WT, F, CN, and FCN animals was performed. While constitutive NFATC1 signaling alone (CN mice) causes bone marrow hypo-cellularity with a marked reduction of LinnegSca1posc-kitpos (LSK) stem cells when compared to all other genotypes (Fig. 2a), co-expression of FLT3ITD with NFATC1 in FCN mice leads to a significant expansion of the LSK- and Linnegc-kitpos (LK) compartments in bone marrow (Fig. 2a, b) and the spleen (Additional file 2: Figure S2A, B), suggesting that cooperativity between FLT3ITD and NFATC1 causes stem and progenitor cell expansion. Of note, LK progenitors in the bone marrow of FCN mice are predominantly granulocyte-monocyte progenitors (GMP) (Additional file 2: Figure S2C). While having strongly reduced mature granulocytes (Gr-1high/CD11b+) (Fig. 2c, Additional file 2: Figure S2D) compared to F and CN mice, FCN mice display a profoundly increased monocytic population (Gr-1−/CD11b+) in bone marrow and spleen. NFATC1/FLT3ITD cooperatively mediate myeloid precursor and stem cell expansion at the expense of maturation of B220+ B-cell, CD3+ T-cell, and TER119+/CD41− erythroid lineages (Additional file 2: Figure S2E, F). To assess, whether FLT3ITD and NFATC1 signaling cooperativity alters colony formation capacity, the CFU potential of total marrow cells, stem and progenitor cell populations, from WT, CN, F, and FCN mice was compared in vitro. While total bone marrow (Fig. 2d) and sorted LSK and LK populations (Fig. 2e) of F or FCN mice contained more clones with CFU potential than WT or CN mice, the highest CFU counts were detected in FCN mice (Fig. 2d). Thus, increased CFU counts in FCN mice were a consequence of the increase of total LSK and LK and increasing colony forming capability within these compartments (Fig. 2a, b). Intriguingly, NFATC1-signaling alone significantly reduced the fraction of LSK with CFU potential compared to WT, F, and FCN mice (Fig. 2e). Thus, although NFATC1 signaling alone inhibits colony formation capacity of LSK, contemporary FLT3ITD signaling dramatically overcomes this effect.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Immunophenotype and transplantability of AML in FCN mice. (a–c) Immunophenotype of bone marrow. Relative frequency of LSK (a), LK (b), and myeloid populations (c) in total bone marrow (mean ± SD. n = 8 to 20). (d–e) CFU number from total bone marrow (d) or sorted LSK and LK (e) (mean ± SD. n = 3 to 9). f–k Analysis of mice transplanted with total bone marrow cells at different cell concentrations. Genotyping-PCR to assess leukemic engraftment depending on the total number of transplanted cells (f). Spleen weight of recipient animals as a function of the number of transplanted primary leukemia cells (g). Representative comparison of the frequencies of stem cells (LSK) and progenitor cells (LK) in leukemic donor and recipient mice, which had received 107 total donor cells (h). Proportions of LSK (i), LK (j), and CD11b+ (k) in the bone marrow of recipient mice, which have received 107 total donor cells (mean ± SD. n = 3 to 4). A one-way ANOVA or 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparison (a–e) or Dunnett’s post-test (g, i–k) was used to assess the significance of differences (p values: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.)

Full size image

FCN leukemias were transplantable. When 106 and 107 FCN leukemia cells were injected into sub-lethally irradiated WT mice, which were sacrificed after 3 months of observation. FCN engraftment was seen in 1/3 and 3/3 animals, respectively (Fig. 2f), while no engraftment was seen in mice that received 103 and 105 cells. Recipient animals developed a monocytic leukemia and splenomegaly (Fig. 2e). Importantly, in contrast to secondary F leukemias, which showed less LSK and LK than primary F leukemias (Fig. 2h, i), as exemplary shown (Additional file 3: Figure S3), secondary recipients of FCN leukemias fully re-established the FCN leukemia phenotype, maintained or even increased the proportions of LSK, LK, and monocytic fractions (Fig. 2h–k).

NFATC1 causes primary resistance to the FLT3-inhibitor quizartinib

Clinical efficacy of FLT3ITD-specific TKI in the relapsed or refractory situation is often limited by the development of resistance [13, 15, 16]. We have previously shown that NFATC1 mediates sorafenib resistance in vitro. Here, we asked, whether increased NFATC1 expression causes resistance to quizartinib [26], a more potent FLT3ITD inhibitor, or to standard chemotherapy in primary F and FCN leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo. After in vitro treatment with cytarabine at 10 nM and 100 nM, FCN bone marrow formed significantly more colonies in soft agar compared to F bone marrow, suggesting NFATC1 induces cytarabine resistance (Fig. 3a, b). We also investigated the sensitivity of F and FCN leukemia to quizartinib vs. chemotherapy in vivo. To this end, three cohorts, respectively, of FCN and F mice (average age of 6 months) were treated with doxorubicin plus cytarabine (5 + 3 days), treated with quizartinib (21 days), or mock treated with vehicle only (Fig. 3c). Mice were sacrificed the day following last treatment, and bone marrow and spleens were harvested. At this time, bone marrow histology showed a slight reduction in marrow cellularity through quizartinib in F but not in FCN mice, and a stronger cytopenia after chemotherapy in F and FCN mice (Fig. 3d). Moreover, while F mice showed an up to 61% reduction in CFU counts, LSK, and LK numbers after quizartinib treatment, FCN animals did not (Fig. 3e–g), suggesting NFATC1-induced quizartinib resistance. NFATC1-induced cytarabine resistance in vitro could be overcome by combination chemotherapy in vivo (Fig. 3e–h). Of note, monocytic cells (Gr-1−/CD11b+) were more resistant to chemotherapy or quizartinib than stem and progenitor cells (Fig. 3h).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Analysis of treatment sensitivity to quizartinib and chemotherapy. (a, b) Response to in vitro cytarabine treatment of total bone marrow. CFU number after treatment (a). Normalized CFU reduction (b). (mean ± SD. n = 3) 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparison was used for p values. c Scheme of in vivo treatment. d Histology of the bone marrow of AC220- and chemotherapy-treated groups. Scale bar, 100 μm. (e–h) Normalized CFU number reduction (e), normalized bone marrow LSK reduction (f), normalized bone marrow LK reduction (g), normalized bone marrow Gr-1−/CD11b+ reduction (h) (median ± IR. n = 6 to 10). Mann-Whitney test was used for p values. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Full size image

De novo recruitment of NFATC1 dependent leukemic signaling pathways in the context of FLT3ITD

To obtain insights into the transcriptional deregulations that underlie phenotypic changes of FCN mice, we compared the transcriptome of hematopoietic stem cells (LSK) from FCN, F, and CN mice to WT mice using RNA sequencing. This revealed that FCN-LSK express substantially more differentially expressed (DE) genes than F or CN LSK (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, data support that constitutively nuclear NFATC1 causes a profound qualitative gene expression shift in the context of FLT3ITD signaling, because only a minority of DE genes in FCN (n = 417) overlaps with DE genes in F alone (n = 36) (Fig. 4a). Most of the DE genes of CN stem cells (n = 54) did not overlap with FCN DE genes. Most of the DE genes in FCN stem cells encode for membrane proteins, followed by DE genes encoding for secreted, cytoplasmatic, and nuclear proteins (data not shown). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) analysis for transcription factor targets (TFT) revealed 17, 51, and 99 candidate TFs with at least one binding site in the significantly regulated DE gene sets of CN, F, and FCN stem cells, respectively (Fig. 4b). This implies that NFATC1 enables transcriptional activation in stem cells exclusively in the context of FLT3ITD expression. Intriguingly, TFs, which—according to their predicted binding sites in DE genes—only bound to their target genes in FCN stem cells such as LEF1, RUNX1, STAT5B were previously shown to be critically involved in leukemic HSC transformation, especially also FLT3ITD-induced transformation [20, 27, 28] (Fig. 4c). Using gene set enrichment analysis, we investigated the involvement of F, CN, and FCN DE genes in the regulation of different biological processes, reflected by different C2 gene sets. Among the 87 significantly regulated C2 gene sets in FCN stem cells, only 6 are also deregulated by F stem cells, suggesting that NFATC1 critically governs recruitment of genes into novel gene sets in an FLT3ITD-dependent manner (Fig. 5a). GSEA of the involvement of FCN DE genes in hallmark cancer pathways uncovered the K-RAS-, Hedgehog-, and WNT/B-Catenin-signaling pathways as well as glycolysis signaling among the 11 significantly activated oncogenic pathways that were specifically recruited through the cooperation of NFATC1 and FLT3ITD in FCN stem cells (Fig. 5b, c). There were further 14 oncogenic hallmark pathways that were significantly activated both in F and especially in FCN HSC, among them inflammation-, TP53-, TNF-alpha-, and JAK-STAT signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a process known to be regulated by NFAT in embryonic stem cells (Additional file 4: Figure S4).

Fig. 4.
figure 4

RNA sequencing of stem cells. a Euler diagram of DE genes with Log2FC greater 1 or less − 1 and FDR < 0.01. b Euler diagram for analysis from GSEA C3 TFT database. c Summary table for analysis from GSEA C3 TFT database

Full size image
Fig. 5.
figure 5

GSEA analysis from C3 TFT database. a Euler diagram for analysis from GSEA C2 database. b Euler diagram for analysis from GSEA H database. c Summary table for analysis from GSEA H database: 11 pathways exclusively enriched in FCN

Full size image

NFATC1 and FLT3-signaling govern poor survival in AML

We studied, whether NFATC1 expression is of prognostic importance in AML. Survival of two independent AML cohorts, GSE12417 [29] (n = 163) and TCGA [30] (n = 168), was analyzed according to high or low NFATC1 expression levels using the SurvExpress online biomarker validation tool [31]. In both AML cohorts, NFATC1- overexpression was associated with a significantly worse overall survival (Fig. 6a, b).

Fig. 6.
figure 6

Overall survival in AML patients according to high or low NFATC1 expression levels. KM plots were generated using a median split

Full size image

Discussion

Here, we provide evidence that NFATC1 is an essential driver of FLT3ITD-dependent leukemic transformation and demonstrate a previously unknown prognostic role for NFATC1 in AML. By generating a transgenic Flt3ITD-mouse model with tamoxifen-inducible targeted expression of NFATC1 in HSC, we show that expression of nuclear NFATC1 is a key factor driving FLT3ITD-induced stem cell expansion and transformation and confers primary FLT3ITD inhibitor resistance.

Development of this mouse model was prompted by our recent observations showing that many FLT3ITD-positive and -negative AML patients frequently overexpress NFATC1. We have also shown previously in a murine model of inflammation-driven pancreatic cancerogenesis that NFATC1 is a relay switch converting KrasG12D-driven pre-neoplastic changes into a rapidly lethal metastatic pancreatic cancer [7]. Here, we demonstrate that expression of the nuclear NFATC1 in stem cells changes the biological outcome of aberrant FLT3ITD kinase signaling. In the presence of NFATC1, FLT3ITD-signaling leads to extensive precursor cell expansion, development of a fully penetrant lethal and quizartinib-resistant AML. In contrast, neither expression of FLT3ITD nor NFATC1 alone in HSC causes an apparent phenotype in vivo.

Fundamental gene expression changes underlie the biological differences among F, CN, and FCN animals. A GSEA-TFT-based alignment of differential gene expression patterns and target motifs for TFs in the promoters/enhancers of DE genes strongly suggested that there is qualitative and quantitative cooperativity between NFATC1 and FLT3ITD. Qualitative cooperativity is presumably due to an NFATC1-dependent de novo recruitment of TFs to promoters in FCN, but not F or CN DE genes. Among them were TFs that are known to be involved in stem cell transformation such as LEF1 [32], HOXA4 [33] or FLT3ITD-dependent AML transformation, such as RUNX1 [20], STAT5 [28, 34], and MYB [35]. In line with these qualitative changes in gene expression, key self-renewal pathways of leukemogenesis, such as the Hedgehog- and WNT/B-Catenin signaling pathways, are recruited de novo only in FCN stem cells. Both these pathways were shown to be essential for the maintenance of cancer stem cells in myeloid leukemias and can be specifically targeted by therapeutic intervention [36, 37].

According to our GSEA TFT analysis, NFATC1 enables the recruitment of FLT3ITD-inducible TFs such as the MAPK-inducible TFs AP1 and NF-κB, STAT5 [34], and FOXO4 [38] to significantly more target genes than would be accessible with FLT3ITD expression alone. RNA sequencing indeed suggests a dramatic amplification of FLT3ITD-signaling output in the presence of nuclear NFATC1, that is, recruitment of more genes into existing FLT3ITD-dependent gene sets. Intriguingly, GSEA-TFT analysis of FCN stem cells shows activation of known NFATC1 binding partners AP1 and RUNX1 [39, 40], which were recently uncovered as key drivers of an open chromatin structure in FLT3ITD-positive primary AML blasts [41]. This supports that NFATC1’s transforming potential in the context of oncogenic FLT3ITD-signaling is linked to its capability to induce or promote active chromatin states [7, 39, 42].

Chromatin-modifying roles of TFs are not unprecedented. They have been reported for TF involved in leukemogenesis such as TCF/LEF1 [37] or FOX [43]. Our data suggest that NFATC1/FLT3ITD cooperativity leads to a gain of transcriptional plasticity, which is an important prerequisite for the acquisition of increased fitness and thus development of phenotypic diversity such as drug resistance under selective pressure [44] (Additional file 5: Figure S5).

In contrast to F animals, FCN animals were resistant to a clinically effective FLT3ITD-inhibitor, quizartinib [45], because only F animals showed a significant reduction of LK and LSK. The fact that quizartinib did not more potently eliminate F leukemia might be explained by the fact that in contrast to human FLT3ITD positive AML, FLT3ITD fails to induce oncogenic dependence in FLT3ITD-induced myeloproliferation in F mice. In AML patients, FLT3ITD induces oncogene dependence as the basis of therapy response to FLT3 inhibition [16], yet remissions are short lived and mostly not curative [13, 15, 46]. We have previously shown that NFATC1-induced FLT3ITD-inhibitor resistance is FLT3ITD-independent [8]. In contrast to FLT3ITD, bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins, such as BRD4, which read chromatin and regulate transcription, are non-oncogene addiction targets in MLL-AF9-positive AML [47]. BET inhibitor resistance is mediated via activation of WNT signaling, which involves a profound transcriptional reprogramming [48]. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that WNT-signaling activation through FLT3ITD/NFATC1 cooperativity (Fig. 5d) mediates FLT3ITD-independent FLT3-inhibitor resistance that could be overcome using BET- or WNT-signaling inhibitors.

Moreover, the recruitment of independent oncogenic signaling pathways through FLT3ITD/NFATC1 cooperativity might explain, why oncogenic driver mutations such as FLT3ITD—though being instrumental for AML initiation—become dispensable for AML maintenance, once NFATC1 is overexpressed. The importance of NFATC1 overexpression for AML transformation as suggested by the FCN mouse model is supported by the observation of a dismal prognostic influence of NFATC1 overexpression in AML. Ongoing studies will reveal whether pre-emptive blocking of inflammatory signals that trigger NFATC1 expression or NFATC1-activation itself using cyclosporine could be a concept to prevent NFATC1-dependent leukemogenesis.

Methods

Transgenic animals

Flt3ITD mice (B6.129 background) were bought from Jackson Laboratory, transgenic NFATC1 mice and conditional Cre-SCL-HSC-ER mice (both C57Bl/6j background) generated as described previously [7, 24] (for breeding scheme, see Additional file 1: Figure S1). All mice (except recipient mice in transplantation experiment) were treated with CreActive TAM400 (LASvendi LASCRdiet) tamoxifen diet for 21 days. All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with TierSchG and were approved by RP Giessen.

Blood analysis

A total of 50 μl of blood was taken from the tail vein and max of 10% (v/v) of Di-Sodium-EDTA 1.107% solution was added to prevent coagulation. Blood films were stained with Wright-Giemsa method. For blood cell counts, a dilution of 1:7 in NaCl 0.9% was made and measured in a capillary mode on SYSMEX XS 1000i.

PCR

See Additional file 6: Table S1 for primer and PCR reaction information.

Cytospins and pathology

Cytospins were prepared with 2 × 105 cells and stained with Wright-Giemsa. For pathology, mouse organs were fixed in 4% PFA (paraformaldehyde) and stained with H&E.

Western blotting

Blood samples for Western blotting were obtained from the tail vein and erythrocytes were lysed. Total protein lysates and transfer were performed as described previously [19]. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse monoclonal anti-HA, clone 6E2 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-beta-actin, and clone AC-15 (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). Secondary goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HSP)-conjugated antibody was used (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) (see Additional file 7: Table S2).

Immunohistochemistry

Sections of paraffin-embedded bone marrow were immunohistochemically stained using the NovolinkTM Polymer Detection Kit (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), pH 6.0 for antigen unmasking and the NFAT2 monoclonal antibody, clone ab25916 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) (see Additional file 7: Table S2).

Flow cytometry and cell sorting

Flow cytometry analysis was performed as previously described [28]. Cell sorting was performed using the same antibodies and staining protocols (for the list of antibodies used, see Additional file 7: Table S2).

In vitro colony forming assays

Total bone marrow after erythrocyte lysis or sorted populations were seeded into full cytokine methylcellulose medium (Methocult M3434, STEMCELL Technologies) at 4000 cells for total bone marrow or 500 cells for sorted LSK or LK per well, respectively. Colonies were counted at 7 to 14 days. Cells were re-plated at the same cell numbers.

Bone marrow transplantation

Total bone marrow from diseased animals or WT controls was isolated, erythrocytes were lysed and four different concentrations of total cells (1 × 107, 1 × 106, 1 × 105, and 1 × 103) transplanted via tail vein injection into sub-lethally (7 Gy) irradiated WT recipients. According to the mouse experimental proposal, transplanted recipient mice were sacrificed and analyzed 3 months after transplantation.

In vitro and in vivo treatment

For in vitro cytarabine treatment, total bone marrow cells were seeded after erythrocyte lysis into 6-well plates at 4 × 104 cells per well in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (plus 20% fetal calf serum, 2% penicillin/streptomycin and cytokines: IL-3, IL-6, stem cell factor 0.1%) and treated with 0.9% sodium chloride solution or cytarabine at concentrations of 10 nM or 100 nM for 24 h. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and seeded into methylcellulose medium in triplicates at 4 × 103 cells per dish (as described [8, 49]). The colony number was evaluated after 7–10 days.

For in vivo treatment, the AC220 treatment group received AC220 daily at 10 mg/kg, suspended in 5% 2-hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin for 21 days. The chemotherapy group received intraperitoneal injections of 100 mg/kg cytarabine for 5 days and 3 mg/kg doxorubicin for 3 days. Both control groups received solvent.

RNA sequencing and analysis

Total RNAs were isolated from sorted mouse bone marrow stem cells (LSK, n = 2 to 3 per genotype) using RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For WT and CN genotypes, several bone marrow samples were pooled together to get enough material per one mRNA sample. RNA libraries were generated with the NEBNext ® UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs® Inc.), according to the protocol of the manufacturer. The libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000, requested Read Length HiSeq 2 × 75 bp with paired end.

Mapping was done with bwa aligner to GRCm38 (mm10) mouse genome (see Additional file 8: Table S3 for raw counts). DESeq2 was used to calculate differentially expressed genes. DE genes were filtered by FDR adjusted p value less than 0.01 and log2 fold change greater than 1 and less than − 1 (see Additional file 9: Table S4 for DE genes). The information on the subcellular localization of the proteins coded by the DE genes was collected from the databases http://www.uniprot.org and https://imb.uq.edu.au. GSEA analysis [50] was performed with the filtered DE genes on the following platform: http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/annotate.jsp. We used H, C3 TFT, or C2 MSigDB databases and considered only gene sets with FDR q value less than 0.01.

AML patient data analysis

Overall survival of AML patients was analyzed according to NFATC1 expression levels. Kaplan Meier plots were generated for the data sets GSE21417 and TCGA using SurvExpress—a biomarker validation tool and database for cancer gene expression data [31]. The median NFATC1 expression level was used as the threshold to split AML patients into two high versus low NFATC1-expressing cohorts.

Statistical analysis

Data, which followed normal distribution, are presented as mean ± SD. Differences between groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni or Dunnett’s multiple comparison post testing; p < 0.05 was considered significant. The data, which did not follow normal distribution, are presented as median ± IR. The differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. Log-rank test was used to calculate the p value of the difference in the OS.

Conclusions

For the first time, it is shown that NFATC1—a transcription factor that is induced upon inflammatory stimuli—converts FLT3ITD-induced myeloproliferation into an FLT3ITD inhibitor-resistant, lethal AML, which is associated with NFATC1-dependent de novo recruitment of key oncogenic signaling pathways. This implies that therapeutic targeting of these pathways, NFATc1 itself using calcineurin inhibitors or inflammation could be a strategy to treat NFATc1-expressing myeloid neoplasias.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

ARCH:

Age-related clonal hematopoiesis

BET:

Bromodomain and extra-terminal protein

CFU:

Colony forming units

CHIP:

Clonal hematopoiesis of indetermined potential

CMP:

Common myeloid progenitor

CN:

Double transgenic Scl-HSC-Cre-ERT:NFATC1 mouse

DE genes:

Differentially expressed genes

ERT :

Estrogen receptor, induced by tamoxifen

F:

Transgenic Flt3ITD mouse

FCN:

Triple transgenic Flt3ITD:Scl-HSC-Cre-ERT:NFATC1 mouse

GMP:

Granulocyte-monocyte progenitors

GSEA:

Gene set enrichment analysis

HA:

Hemagglutinin

HSC:

Hematopoietic stem cells

LK:

Mouse Linnegc-kitpos progenitor cells

LSK:

Mouse LinnegSca1posc-kitpos stem cells

MEP:

Megakariocate-erythrocyte progenitor

OS:

Overall survival

TCGA:

The cancer genome atlas project

TF:

Transcription factor

TFT:

Transcription factor targets

TKI:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

T-PLL:

T-prolymphocytic leukemia

WT:

Wild type mouse

References

  1. Busque L, Patel JP, Figueroa ME, Vasanthakumar A, Provost S, Hamilou Z, et al. Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis. Nat Genet. Nature Publishing Group. 2012;44:1179–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, Gaidzik VI, Paschka P, Roberts ND, et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2209–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen J, Kao Y-R, Sun D, Todorova TI, Reynolds D, Narayanagari S-R, et al. Myelodysplastic syndrome progression to acute myeloid leukemia at the stem cell level. Nat Med. Nature Publishing Group. 2018:1.

  4. Li S, Garrett-Bakelman FE, Chung SS, Sanders MA, Hricik T, Rapaport F, et al. Distinct evolution and dynamics of epigenetic and genetic heterogeneity in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Med. 2016;22:792–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Macian F. NFAT proteins: key regulators of T-cell development and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:472–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Northrop JP, Ho SN, Chen L, Thomas DJ, Timmerman LA, Nolan GP, et al. NF-AT components define a family of transcription factors targeted in T-cell activation. Nature. 1994;369:497–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baumgart S, Chen N-M, Siveke JT, König A, Zhang J-S, Singh SK, et al. Inflammation-induced NFATc1-STAT3 transcription complex promotes pancreatic cancer initiation by KrasG12D. Cancer Discov. Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2014;4:688–701.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Metzelder SK, Michel C, Bonin v M, Rehberger M, Hessmann E, Inselmann S, et al. NFATc1 as a therapeutic target in FLT3-ITD-positive AML. Leukemia. 2015;29:1470–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakao M, Yokota S, Iwai T, Kaneko H, Horiike S, Kashima K, et al. Internal tandem duplication of the flt3 gene found in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 1996;10:1911–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thiede C, Steudel C, Mohr B, Schaich M, Schäkel U, Platzbecker U, et al. Analysis of FLT3-activating mutations in 979 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: association with FAB subtypes and identification of subgroups with poor prognosis. Blood. 2002;99:4326–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129:424–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Metzelder S, Wang Y, Wollmer E, Wanzel M, Teichler S, Chaturvedi A, et al. Compassionate use of sorafenib in FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia: sustained regression before and after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2009;113:6567–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Metzelder SK, Schroeder T, Finck A, Scholl S, Fey M, Götze K, et al. High activity of sorafenib in FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia synergizes with allo-immune effects to induce sustained responses. Leukemia. 2012.

  14. Cortes J, Perl AE, Döhner H, Kantarjian H, Martinelli G, Kovacsovics T, et al. Quizartinib, an FLT3 inhibitor, as monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:889–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Perl AE, Altman JK, Cortes J, Smith C, Litzow M, Baer MR, et al. Selective inhibition of FLT3 by gilteritinib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, first-in-human, open-label, phase 1-2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1061–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith CC, Wang Q, Chin C-S, Salerno S, Damon LE, Levis MJ, et al. Validation of ITD mutations in FLT3 as a therapeutic target in human acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2012;485:260–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li L, Piloto O, Nguyen HB, Greenberg K, Takamiya K, Racke F, et al. Knock-in of an internal tandem duplication mutation into murine FLT3 confers myeloproliferative disease in a mouse model. Blood. Am Soc Hematol. 2008;111:3849–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly LM, Liu Q, Kutok JL, Williams IR, Boulton CL, Gilliland DG. FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations associated with human acute myeloid leukemias induce myeloproliferative disease in a murine bone marrow transplant model. Blood. 2002;99:310–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee BH, Tothova Z, Levine RL, Anderson K, Buza-Vidas N, Cullen DE, et al. FLT3 mutations confer enhanced proliferation and survival properties to multipotent progenitors in a murine model of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:367–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Behrens K, Maul K, Tekin N, Kriebitzsch N, Indenbirken D, Prassolov V, et al. RUNX1 cooperates with FLT3-ITD to induce leukemia. J Exp Med. Rockefeller University Press. 2017;214:737–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Greenblatt S, Li L, Slape C, Nguyen B, Novak R, Duffield A, et al. Knock-in of a FLT3/ITD mutation cooperates with a NUP98-HOXD13 fusion to generate acute myeloid leukemia in a mouse model. Blood. Am Soc of Hematol. 2012;119:2883–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chu SH, Heiser D, Li L, Kaplan I, Collector M, Huso D, et al. FLT3-ITD knockin impairs hematopoietic stem cell quiescence/homeostasis, leading to myeloproliferative neoplasm. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:346–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pan M-G, Xiong Y, Chen F. NFAT gene family in inflammation and cancer. Curr Mol Med. 2013;13:543–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Göthert JR, Gustin SE, van Eekelen JAM, Schmidt U, Hall MA, Jane SM, et al. Genetically tagging endothelial cells in vivo: bone marrow-derived cells do not contribute to tumor endothelium. Blood. 2004;104:1769–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Göthert JR, Gustin SE, Hall MA, Green AR, Göttgens B, Izon DJ, et al. In vivo fate-tracing studies using the Scl stem cell enhancer: embryonic hematopoietic stem cells significantly contribute to adult hematopoiesis. Blood. 2005;105:2724–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zarrinkar PP, Gunawardane RN, Cramer MD, Gardner MF, Brigham D, Belli B, et al. AC220 is a uniquely potent and selective inhibitor of FLT3 for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Blood. 2009;114:2984–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Petropoulos K, Arseni N, Schessl C, Stadler CR, Rawat VPS, Deshpande AJ, et al. A novel role for Lef-1, a central transcription mediator of Wnt signaling, in leukemogenesis. J Exp Med. Rockefeller University Press. 2008;205:515–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Choudhary C, Brandts C, Schwable J, Tickenbrock L, Sargin B, Ueker A, et al. Activation mechanisms of STAT5 by oncogenic Flt3-ITD. Blood, vol. 110: Am Soc Hematol; 2007. p. 370–4.

  29. Metzeler KH, Hummel M, Bloomfield CD, Spiekermann K, Braess J, Sauerland MC, et al. An 86-probe-set gene-expression signature predicts survival in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. Blood, vol. 112: Am Soc Hematol; 2008. p. 4193–201.

  30. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Ley TJ, Miller C, Ding L, Raphael BJ, Mungall AJ, et al. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. Massachusetts Medical Society. 2013;368:2059–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aguirre-Gamboa R, Gomez-Rueda H, Martínez-Ledesma E, Martínez-Torteya A, Chacolla-Huaringa R, Rodriguez-Barrientos A, et al. SurvExpress: an online biomarker validation tool and database for cancer gene expression data using survival analysis. Cho WCS, editor, vol. 8: PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science; 2013. p. e74250.

  32. Kirstetter P, Anderson K, Porse BT, Jacobsen SEW, Nerlov C. Activation of the canonical Wnt pathway leads to loss of hematopoietic stem cell repopulation and multilineage differentiation block. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:1048–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zangenberg M, Grubach L, Aggerholm A, Silkjaer T, Juhl-Christensen C, Nyvold CG, et al. The combined expression of HOXA4 and MEIS1 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with AML. Eur J Haematol. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111). 2009;83:439–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mizuki M, Fenski R, Halfter H, Matsumura I, Schmidt R, Müller C, et al. Flt3 mutations from patients with acute myeloid leukemia induce transformation of 32D cells mediated by the Ras and STAT5 pathways. Blood. 2000;96:3907–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hess JL, Bittner CB, Zeisig DT, Bach C, Fuchs U, Borkhardt A, et al. c-Myb is an essential downstream target for homeobox-mediated transformation of hematopoietic cells. Blood. American Society of Hematology. 2006;108:297–304.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dierks C, Beigi R, Guo G-R, Zirlik K, Stegert MR, Manley P, et al. Expansion of Bcr-Abl-positive leukemic stem cells is dependent on Hedgehog pathway activation. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:238–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Reya T, Duncan AW, Ailles L, Domen J, Scherer DC, Willert K, et al. A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2003;423:409–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sykes SM, Lane SW, Bullinger L, Kalaitzidis D, Yusuf R, Saez B, et al. AKT/FOXO signaling enforces reversible differentiation blockade in myeloid leukemias. Cell. 2011;146:697–708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Müller MR, Rao A. NFAT, immunity and cancer: a transcription factor comes of age. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:645–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Macián F, López-Rodríguez C, Rao A. Partners in transcription: NFAT and AP-1. Oncogene. Nature Publishing Group. 2001;20:2476–89.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cauchy P, James SR, Zacarias-Cabeza J, Ptasinska A, Imperato MR, Assi SA, et al. Chronic FLT3-ITD signaling in acute myeloid leukemia is connected to a specific chromatin signature. Cell Rep. 2015;12:821–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beekman R, Chapaprieta V, Russiñol N, Vilarrasa-Blasi R, Verdaguer-Dot N, Martens JHA, et al. The reference epigenome and regulatory chromatin landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Med. Nature Publishing Group. 2018;24:868–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lalmansingh AS, Karmakar S, Jin Y, Nagaich AK. Multiple modes of chromatin remodeling by Forkhead box proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1819:707–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gillies RJ, Verduzco D, Gatenby RA. Evolutionary dynamics of carcinogenesis and why targeted therapy does not work. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:487–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Cortes JE, Tallman MS, Schiller GJ, Trone D, Gammon G, Goldberg SL, et al. Phase 2b study of 2 dosing regimens of quizartinib monotherapy in FLT3-ITD-mutated, relapsed or refractory AML. Blood, vol. 132: American Society of Hematology; 2018. p. 598–607.

  46. Cortes JE, Kantarjian H, Foran JM, Ghirdaladze D, Zodelava M, Borthakur G, et al. Phase I study of quizartinib administered daily to patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia irrespective of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication status. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3681–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zuber J, Shi J, Wang E, Rappaport AR, Herrmann H, Sison EA, et al. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. Nature Publishing Group. 2011;478:524–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rathert P, Roth M, Neumann T, Muerdter F, Roe J-S, Muhar M, et al. Transcriptional plasticity promotes primary and acquired resistance to BET inhibition. Nature. 2015;525:543–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kumari A, Brendel C, Hochhaus A, Neubauer A, Burchert A. Low BCR-ABL expression levels in hematopoietic precursor cells enable persistence of chronic myeloid leukemia under imatinib. Blood. American Society of Hematology; 2012;119:530–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. P Natl Acad Sci Usa. 2005;102:15545–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the assistance of the Irradiation Core Facility of the Philipps University supported in part by the DFG, in particular Prof. Dr. K. Zink, Prof. Dr. R.Engenhart-Callibic, and Dr. A. Arenz. We thank PD Dr. C. Brendel, G. Giel, and Dr. H. Reifer for help with cell sorting. We also thank Prof. Dr. R. Moll and V. Wischmann for assistance with hisology. This work was supported by the Deutsche José Carreras Leukämiestiftung (AR12/12). It was also supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG, Klinische Forschergruppe 210 “Genetics of Drug resistance in Cancer” (TP7 to AB), and an unrestricted grant of the “Anneliese Pohl Stiftung” (to AB). We thank Sonja Tajstra for her excellent technical assistance in performing mice work.

Funding

This work was funded by DFG (KFO210/TP7) and DCLS (AR12/12).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    Maria Solovey, Ying Wang, Christian Michel, Andreas Neubauer & Andreas Burchert

  2. Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

    Klaus H. Metzeler & Tobias Herold

  3. Department of Hematology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

    Joachim R. Göthert

  4. Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany

    Volker Ellenrieder & Elisabeth Hessmann

  5. Institute of Pathology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany

    Stefan Gattenlöhner

  6. Genomics Core Facility, EMBL Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany

    Dinko Pavlinic & Vladimir Benes

  7. Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, University Giessen, Giessen, Germany

    Oliver Rupp

Authors
  1. Maria Solovey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ying Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian Michel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Klaus H. Metzeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tobias Herold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joachim R. Göthert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Volker Ellenrieder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Elisabeth Hessmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Stefan Gattenlöhner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Andreas Neubauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Dinko Pavlinic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Vladimir Benes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Oliver Rupp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Andreas Burchert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MS helped in project design, performed the experiments, performed bioinformatics analysis, analyzed data, and helped in writing the manuscript. YW designed and performed RNA sequencing experiments, analyzed the data, and reviewed the manuscript. CM helped in performing experiments, helped in the design of the project, analyzed the data, and reviewed the manuscript. KHM and TH designed experiments, analyzed data, and contributed in writing the manuscript, JRG, VE, and EH helped in the design of mice experiments, analyzed the data, and reviewed the manuscript. SG designed experiments, performed immunohistochemistry, analyzed the data, and reviewed the manuscript. DP and VB designed RNA-sequencing experiments, helped in performing sequencing, helped in bioinformatic analysis, and reviewed the manuscript. OR performed bioinformatic analysis of sequencing data and reviewed the manuscript. AB designed and coordinated the project, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. All authors read and approved the final manuscipt.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Burchert.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with TierSchG and were approved by RP Giessen (approval number V54-19c2015h01MR20/36Nr.17/2013).

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Breeding scheme. The genotypes used for the experiments are marked with red boxes: FLT3ITD homozygous (F+/+), SCL-HSC-CreER:NFATC1 homozygous (CN+/+), and FLT3ITD:SCL-HSC-CreER:NFATC1 homozygous (F+/+CN+/+). Note: in all the SCL-HSC-CreER–baring animals, the zygosity of the Cre allele is unknown. (PPTX 44 kb)

Additional file 2:

Figure S2. Immunophenotyping of bone marrow and spleen. (A) Relative frequencies of LSK (mean ± SD. n = 6 to 16). (B) Relative frequencies of LK (mean ± SD. n = 6 to 16). (C) Relative frequencies of GMP, CMP, and MEP (mean ± SEM. n = 3 to 4). (D) Relative myeloid populations (mean ± SD. n = 6 to 16). (E) Relative frequencies of B-cells (B220+), T-cells (CD3+), erythrocytes (TER119+) and megakaryocytes (CD41+) (mean ± SEM. n = 3 to 10). (F) Relative frequencies of B-cells (B220+), T-cells (CD3+), erythrocytes (TER119+) and megakaryocytes (CD41+) (mean ± SEM. n = 3 to 10). A 1-way ANOVA or 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison was used for p values. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (PPTX 1112 kb)

Additional file 3:

Figure S3. Immunophenotyping of bone marrow and spleen after transplantation into CN or WT recipients. 107 total bone marrow cells from F or FCN donor mice were transplanted into irradiated WT recipients. FACS analysis of LSK/LK and myeloid populations are shown for each recipient mouse. (PPTX 484 kb)

Additional file 4:

Figure S4. GSEA analysis from C3 H database for mutual FCN and F genes. Summary table for analysis from GSEA H database: 14 pathways enriched in both FCN and F (only values for FCN are shown). (PPTX 80 kb)

Additional file 5:

Figure S5. Working model. Activation of NFATC1 by an inflammatory environment rewires the transcriptional program induced by FLT3-ITD in stem cells, which promotes leukemic transformation. The FLT3-ITD/NFATC1 synergism activates multiple oncogenic pathways such as WNT/B-Catenin, Hedgehog, and K-RAS, causing extensive proliferation and drug resistance. (PPTX 91 kb)

Additional file 6:

Table S1. PCR primer. (XLSX 36 kb)

Additional file 7:

Table S2. Antibodies. (XLSX 42 kb)

Additional file 8:

Table S3. Counts. (XLSX 898 kb)

Additional file 9:

Table S4. DE genes. (XLSX 4937 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solovey, M., Wang, Y., Michel, C. et al. Nuclear factor of activated T-cells, NFATC1, governs FLT3ITD-driven hematopoietic stem cell transformation and a poor prognosis in AML. J Hematol Oncol 12, 72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0765-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0765-y

Keywords

Journal of Hematology & Oncology

ISSN: 1756-8722

Contact us