Open Access

Expression and role of RIP140/NRIP1 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

  • Marion Lapierre1, 2, 3, 4,
  • Audrey Castet-Nicolas1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
  • Delphine Gitenay1, 2, 3, 4,
  • Stéphan Jalaguier1, 2, 3, 4,
  • Catherine Teyssier1, 2, 3, 4,
  • Caroline Bret6, 7, 3,
  • Guillaume Cartron8, 9, 3,
  • Jérôme Moreaux6, 7, 3 and
  • Vincent Cavaillès1, 2, 3, 4Email author
Journal of Hematology & Oncology20158:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-015-0116-6

Received: 24 October 2014

Accepted: 9 February 2015

Published: 4 March 2015

Abstract

RIP140 is a transcriptional coregulator, (also known as NRIP1), which finely tunes the activity of various transcription factors and plays very important physiological roles. Noticeably, the RIP140 gene has been implicated in the control of energy expenditure, behavior, cognition, mammary gland development and intestinal homeostasis. RIP140 is also involved in the regulation of various oncogenic signaling pathways and participates in the development and progression of solid tumors. During the past years, several papers have reported evidences linking RIP140 to hematologic malignancies. Among them, two recent studies with correlative data suggested that gene expression signatures including RIP140 can predict survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This review aims to summarize the literature dealing with the expression of RIP140 in CLL and to explore the potential impact of this factor on transcription pathways which play key roles in this pathology.

Keywords

Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaCell signalingRIP140/NRIP1Prognosis marker

Introduction

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common form of leukemia in Western countries and mainly affects elderly individuals. CLL is characterized by the accumulation of malignant mature B cells in bone marrow, blood and lymphoid tissues. The clinical course of CLL is extremely heterogeneous, with many patients presenting an indolent disease, whereas others exhibit an aggressive pathology and require treatment [1,2].

The diagnosis of CLL is based on biological criteria including the presence of a chronic lymphocytosis (≥5.109/L) with a typical phenotype characterized by a κ or λ light chain restriction, the co-expression of B cell markers (CD19, CD20, CD22 with a low density, CD23) with the CD5 antigen (in the absence of other pan-T cell markers) and the expression of additional markers like CD200 or CD43 [3]. These characteristics are also sufficient for the distinction between CLL and other mature B cell disorders such as prolymphocytic leukemia, hairy-cell leukemia, mantle-cell lymphoma, or other lymphomas that can mimic CLL.

CLL has previously been considered as a single entity with a variable clinical course. Recently, there has been considerable progress in the identification of molecular and cellular markers that may predict disease progression in patients with CLL [2]. Particularly, mutational profiles of Ig genes and cytogenetic abnormalities have been demonstrated to display a strong prognostic value (see below).

The transcription factor RIP140

The transcription cofactor RIP140 (receptor-interacting protein of 140 kDa), known as nuclear receptor-interacting protein 1 (NRIP1), was first identified in human breast cancer cells through its interaction with the estrogen receptor α [4]. RIP140 was also shown to interact with many other nuclear receptors and transcription factors (for a review see [5]). RIP140 mainly acts as a transcriptional repressor by means of four inhibitory domains (see Figure 1) that recruit histone deacetylases or C-terminal binding proteins [6,7]. Moreover, several post-translational modifications, such as sumoylation and acetylation, play important roles in controlling the subcellular location and repressive activity of RIP140 (for a review [8]). RIP140 is an ubiquitously expressed gene, located on chromosome 21 in humans, whose transcription is finely regulated at the transcriptional level [9,10]. The RIP140 gene exhibits two promoters and several exons, the last one encompassing the whole coding sequence (see Figure 1).
Figure 1

Structure of the RIP140 gene and protein. Schematic representations of the RIP140 gene and protein (not scaled). (Top panel) The two promoters are shown together with the four exons (E1 to E4) which are represented by small rectangles, the blue one corresponding to the RIP140 coding sequence. (Middle panel) The box represents the RIP140 molecule showing the four different repressive domains (RD). (Bottom panel) The different nuclear signaling pathways either inhibited (−) or stimulated (+) by RIP140 are indicated.

The physiological importance of RIP140 has been evaluated using mice devoid of the RIP140 gene (RIPKO mice). These animals are viable but display a wide range of phenotypic alterations in various tissues and organs, such as infertility of female mice [11] or reduced body fat content [12]. A more recent work demonstrated that they suffer severe cognitive impairments [13]. Besides these important physiological roles, RIP140 has recently been shown to regulate key oncogenic signaling pathways that impact cancer initiation and progression [14-16].

RIP140 and hematopoietic stem cells

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are rare and multipotent, self-renewing precursor cells which are able to generate all specialized cells of the blood system [17]. A precise regulation of HSC proliferation and cell fate decisions is necessary to maintain ongoing production of mature blood cells throughout adult life and for rapid, regenerative responses to hematologic injury. Several studies indicated the importance of active maintenance of HSC stem cell function and identified genes that perturb HSC quiescence and disrupt stem cell maintenance and homeostatic blood cell production [18,19]. Many of these genes encode transcription factors or cell cycle regulators that directly modulate the proliferative activity of HSC.

By using gene expression microarray and systems biology tools, a functional network reconstruction was performed in cord blood CD133+ HSCs in order to identify genes involved in stemness [20]. The RIP140 gene was found highly expressed in HSC, as well as in mesenchymal and neural stem cells. Another study identified the RIP140 gene as being downregulated in mobilized HSC compared to HSC at steady-state [21]. The same report described a decrease in RIP140 expression in leukemic HSC obtained from the bone marrow of Jun B-deficient mice (a model of chronic myelogenous leukemia) as compared to HSC from wild-type mice. Altogether, these data suggested that RIP140 might be an important factor required for the maintenance and function of normal quiescent HSC. Concerning its expression in the different hematopoietic cellular types, a study reported a low RIP140 gene expression in T cells and the highest expression level in NK cells [22] (see Table 1).
Table 1

Expression of the RIP140 gene in the different hematopoietic cellular types

Cell type

T cells

B cells

Monocytes

NK cells

Granulocytes

RIP140 relative expression

100

576

453

1,825

138

The expression levels of the RIP140 gene were determined in normal granulocytes and FACS-sorted monocytes, B cells, T cells and NK cells. Values are expressed as percent of levels measured in T cells.

(Adapted from [22]).

RIP140 as a prognostic marker in CLL

Genetic aberrations such as recurrent losses or gains of chromosomal material as well as mutations of key tumor suppressors have been identified in CLL. Approximately 80% of CLL cases exhibit aberrations in a few recurrently affected chromosomal regions. These aberrations are important “drivers” of the disease and are also considered as prognosis biomarkers. CLL has turned out to be a multifaceted disease with pathogenic mechanisms including genetic aberrations, antigen processing, and microenvironmental interactions. As a consequence, there is a remarkable heterogeneity in the clinical course among patient subgroups with distinct genetic features.

According to the mutation status of immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene segments (IGHVs), CLL patients can be classified in two groups displaying a very different clinical course [23]. Patients with an unmutated IGHV genetic profile show an unfavorable evolution, whereas patients with mutated IGHV have a better prognosis. Other poor prognostic markers in CLL are the chromosomal deletion at 11q (TP53 locus) or 17p (ATM locus). Concerning patients with del(11q), the poor outcome of is overcome by chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab (FCR) [2]. More recently, recurrent mutations of NOTCH1, SF3B1, and TP53 have been shown to be associated with an adverse prognostic impact in CLL [24]. With the development of microarray technology and transcriptomic analyses, additional markers such as zeta-associated protein 70 (ZAP70), lipoprotein lipase (LPL), CLL upregulated 1 (CLLU1), transcription factor 7 (TCF7), T cell leukemias/lymphoma (TCL1A), or a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain 29 (ADAM29) have been characterized [25,26].

RIP140 was first identified as a CLL prognostic factor in a gene expression-based study using a cohort of 130 patients [22]. Furthermore, the RIP140 gene was shown as being part of a recently reported eight-gene expression signature which defined a risk score for CLL patients [27]. Low expression of RIP140 is associated with poor prognostic value for overall survival (OS) and time to treatment requirement (Figure 2). Although no studies have exclusively been focused on RIP140 in CLL, several other published data reported the deregulation of RIP140 gene expression in this pathology (Table 2). Many of these studies showed its differential expression with regard to IGHV mutational status [28-30]. In the study of van’t Veer et al., it was observed that deletion 17p13, associated with short treatment-free intervals, was more frequent in RIP140 negative cases. Similarly, deletion 11q22, which is accepted as an indicator of unfavorable prognosis [31], was only seen in RIP140 negative cases [22]. More recently, some of us reported a new gene expression-based risk score in CLL specimens corresponding to 20 genes (22 probe sets), whose expression splits patients of two independent cohorts into two risk categories [32]. Interestingly, the RIP140 expression kept prognostic value in multivariate COX analysis leading to a new risk stratification of patients with CLL.
Figure 2

Prognostic value of RIP140 in CLL patients. (A) Patients of the Herold’s cohort (n = 107) were ranked according to increasing RIP140 expression and a maximum difference in OS was obtained with an expression cutoff of 7.49 using the Maxstat R function. (B) Low RIP140 expression is associated with a shorter time to the first treatment in CLL patients. The data were normalized using the robust multichip average (RMA) method and Affymetrix gene expression data are publicly available via the online Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE22762, and GSE25571.

Table 2

Main studies describing the deregulation of the RIP140 gene expression in CLL

Reference

Date

Number of CLL patients

Association with VH mutation

Correlation with survival

Haslinger et al. [28]

2004

100

Yes

Vasconcelos et al. [29]

2005

145

Yes

Oppezzo et al. [30]

2005

127

Yes

Van’t veer et al. [22]

2006

130

NS

NS

Herold et al. [27]

2011

151

Yes

Yes

Samra et al. [32]

2014

107

Yes

Yes

NS not significant.

Finally, emerging evidence indicates that the stromal tumor microenvironment plays important roles in the pathogenesis and progression of CLL. The expression of stromal-associated genes has been evaluated using gene expression profiling [33]. Interestingly, the NRIP1 gene was found to be underexpressed in cells isolated from peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph nodes from CLL patients in comparison with healthy donors.

Effect of RIP140 on key signaling pathways in CLL

Since its identification as an estrogen receptor binding protein [4], RIP140 has been characterized as a partner for many transcription factors involved in major oncogenic signaling pathways (Figure 1). Although no published studies support that RIP140 alters the biology of CLL, some of the pathways targeted by RIP140 are highly relevant in CLL biology.

Effect on NF-κB signaling

In CLL, NF-κB has been found to be activated regardless of the disease stage or treatment status [34] and to confer survival benefit through induction of anti-apoptotic proteins including XIAP, BCL-XL, and FLIP [35]. In particular, RelA binding complexes have been demonstrated to be constitutively active in peripheral blood samples of CLL patients, their activation being dependent on the action of the transcription activator signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) [36]. More recently, a role for RelB and RelA has been demonstrated by studying B cells isolated from bone marrow aspirates of CLL patients. RelB activity appeared not only to sustain tumor cell survival but also to enhance cell sensitivity to proteasome inhibitor [37]. More generally, the canonical and non-canonical NF-κB pathways seem to cooperate to CLL progression.

Noticeably, Zschiedrich et al. have reported that RIP140 establishes direct protein-protein interactions with the NF-κB subunit RelA and functions as a coactivator for proinflammatory cytokine gene promoter transcription in macrophages [38]. This coactivator function of RIP140 for NF-κB activity relies on the cooperation with histone acetylase cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB)-binding protein (CBP). Treatment of macrophages by TLR ligands such as LPS increased Syk-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of RIP140 and its interaction with RelA. This also induced the recruitment of the E3 ligase SCF to Syk-phosphorylated RIP140, thus conducting to the degradation of RIP140 and to inactivation of genes encoding inflammatory cytokines [39].

Regulation of Wnt signaling

The Wnt signaling pathway plays a crucial role in the specification and development of hematopoietic stem cells and their microenvironment [40]. There is a growing body of evidence that Wnt signaling, known to play a critical role in various types of cancer, also exerts a key function in B lymphoid malignancies, particularly in CLL [41]. Wnt proteins are overexpressed in primary CLL cells and several physiological inhibitors are partly inactivated in this pathology [42]. Furthermore, the transcription factor lymphoid enhancer binding factor-1 (LEF-1) is highly overexpressed in CLL cells, as compared to normal B cells [43]. Moreover, LEF-1 controls several genes relevant in CLL biology and several components of the Wnt signaling pathway significantly influence CLL cell survival. Salinomycin treatment was shown to inhibit Wnt signaling and induce apoptosis of CLL cells [44]. Nitric oxide-donating acetylsalicylic acid (known to present antitumor effect in Wnt active cancers) induced apoptosis of primary CLL cells and reduced significantly tumor growth in a CLL xenograft murine model [45].

Interestingly, our laboratory has recently reported that RIP140 was a key regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway in mouse and human intestinal epithelial cells [16]. RIP140 increases the transcription of the APC gene promoter, the major tumor suppressor gene in colon cancer. As a consequence, RIP140 inhibits β-catenin activation, resulting in decreased expression of Wnt target genes including c-Myc, c-Jun, endothelin-1, or jagged-1. In CLL, endothelin-1 was demonstrated to promote survival and chemoresistance through endothelin receptor A [46].

Effect on other signaling pathways

RIP140 regulates other signaling pathways highly relevant for CLL biology. Indeed, RIP140 has been identified and characterized as a major partner for nuclear receptors [4,5] which have been shown to be key players in CLL. For instance, high-dose glucocorticoids are used in the treatment of CLL patients [47] and the nuclear receptor PPARα seems to be involved in the resistance to glucocorticoid-mediated cytotoxicity [48]. Another study reported that B-CLL cell survival/viability was decreased as a result of LXR agonist treatment [49]. In addition, the majority of patients with CLL exhibit a significant expression of ERβ, suggesting that this nuclear receptor might be relevant in CLL and used as therapeutic target [50]. Obviously, other signaling pathways important for CLL biology such as p53, Notch, or Hedgehog [51] could be also controlled by RIP140 and further work is needed to uncover and decipher these putative regulatory activities.

Expression of RIP140 in other types of leukemia

Few studies have analyzed the deregulation of the RIP140 gene expression in other hematological diseases. RIP140 expression has been found to be significantly upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with complex karyotypes and abnormal chromosome 21 [52]. By contrast, RIP140 levels are decreased in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a subtype of AML most commonly characterized by the fusion of the retinoic acid receptor α gene to the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) gene [53,54].

The NRIP1 gene has also been involved in genomic translocations. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis performed on a patient diagnosed with a precursor B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) with the t(9;22) translocation, identified the NRIP1 gene as being interrupted at the breakpoints of 21q21.1, and joined with the UHRF1 gene at 19p13.3 as a possible fusion gene, 5′-NRIP1/UHRF1-3′ on the derivative chromosome 19 [55]. Another paper described a breakpoint of t(3;21) (q26;q11) that was assigned to be within the EVI1 and NRIP1 gene and generate a putative NRIP1-EVI1 fusion protein [56]. Finally, another fusion event involving the NRIP1 gene was reported with the open reading frame C21orf34 (also at 21q21 approximately 1 MB apart) in a patient with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [57]. The fusion took place just upstream of miR-125b-2 and was validated by capillary sequencing. Altogether, these data suggest that the NRIP1 gene could be involved in the pathogenesis of different types of leukemia.

Conclusion and future directions

Data clearly suggest that a high expression of RIP140 is a favorable prognostic marker in CLL. However, further work is needed to demonstrate that RIP140 alters CLL biology and to define precisely which signaling pathways are critically regulated by this transcription factor and account for its prognostic value. Several nuclear signaling pathways, including Wnt and NF-κB, are known to be regulated by RIP140 and could be good candidates. In addition, cell models for CLL [58,59] and other types of leukemia [60] have been established and will be useful to define the role of RIP140 at the cellular level. Finally, the use of mouse models with loss and gain of function will be valuable to decipher the role of this gene in normal and tumoral HSC biology.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank all the members of the Hormone Signaling and Cancer laboratory for their help, discussions, and critical reading of the original manuscript. The work was supported by INSERM, Université de Montpellier 1, Fondation Lejeune, INCa, SIRIC Montpellier, ARC (SF120121205949, Paris, France), ANR emergence (ETTMM), CRLR grant (R14026FF), and the Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier
(2)
INSERM, U1194
(3)
Université de Montpellier
(4)
Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier
(5)
Pharmacie, CHU Montpellier
(6)
Département d’Hématologie Biologique, CHU Montpellier
(7)
Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS UPR 1142
(8)
Département d’Hématologie Clinique, CHU Montpellier
(9)
UMR-CNRS 5235

References

  1. Chiorazzi N, Rai KR, Ferrarini M. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:804–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zenz T, Mertens D, Küppers R, Döhner H, Stilgenbauer S. From pathogenesis to treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:37–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, Caligaris-Cappio F, Dighiero G, Döhner H, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood. 2008;111:5446–56.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavailles V, Dauvois S, L’Horset F, Lopez G, Hoare S, Kushner PJ, et al. Nuclear factor RIP140 modulates transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor. EMBO J. 1995;14:3741–51.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Augereau P, Badia E, Carascossa S, Castet A, Fritsch S, Harmand P-O, et al. The nuclear receptor transcriptional coregulator RIP140. Nucl Recept Signal. 2006;4:e024.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Christian M, Tullet JM, Parker MG. Characterization of four autonomous repression domains in the corepressor receptor interacting protein 140. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:15645–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Castet A, Boulahtouf A, Versini G, Bonnet S, Augereau P, Vignon F, et al. Multiple domains of the receptor-interacting protein 140 contribute to transcription inhibition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1957–66.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yang X-J, Seto E. Lysine acetylation: codified crosstalk with other posttranslational modifications. Mol Cell. 2008;31:449–61.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Augereau P, Badia E, Fuentes M, Rabenoelina F, Corniou M, Derocq D, et al. Transcriptional regulation of the human NRIP1/RIP140 gene by estrogen is modulated by dioxin signalling. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;69:1338–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Docquier A, Augereau P, Lapierre M, Harmand P-O, Badia E, Annicotte J-S, et al. The RIP140 gene is a transcriptional target of E2F1. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35839.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. White R, Leonardsson G, Rosewell I, Ann JM, Milligan S, Parker M. The nuclear receptor co-repressor nrip1 (RIP140) is essential for female fertility. Nat Med. 2000;6:1368–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Leonardsson G, Steel JH, Christian M, Pocock V, Milligan S, Bell J, et al. Nuclear receptor corepressor RIP140 regulates fat accumulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:8437–42.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Duclot F, Lapierre M, Fritsch S, White R, Parker MG, Maurice T, et al. Cognitive impairments in adult mice with constitutive inactivation of RIP140 gene expression. Genes Brain Behav. 2012;11:69–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Docquier A, Harmand P-O, Fritsch S, Chanrion M, Darbon J-M, Cavaillès V. The transcriptional coregulator RIP140 represses E2F1 activity and discriminates breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:2959–70.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Docquier A, Garcia A, Savatier J, Boulahtouf A, Bonnet S, Bellet V, et al. Negative regulation of estrogen signaling by ERbeta and RIP140 in ovarian cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2013;27:1429–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lapierre M, Bonnet S, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Ait-Arsa I, Jalaguier S, Del Rio M, et al. RIP140 increases APC expression and controls intestinal homeostasis and tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:1899–913.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Aggarwal R, Lu J, Pompili VJ, Das H. Hematopoietic stem cells: transcriptional regulation, ex vivo expansion and clinical application. Curr Mol Med. 2012;12:34–49.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Morrison SJ, Scadden DT. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2014;505:327–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Passegué E, Wagers AJ, Giuriato S, Anderson WC, Weissman IL. Global analysis of proliferation and cell cycle gene expression in the regulation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell fates. J Exp Med. 2005;202:1599–611.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang T-S, Hsieh J-Y, Wu Y-H, Jen C-H, Tsuang Y-H, Chiou S-H, et al. Functional network reconstruction reveals somatic stemness genetic maps and dedifferentiation-like transcriptome reprogramming induced by GATA2. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1186–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Forsberg EC, Passegué E, Prohaska SS, Wagers AJ, Koeva M, Stuart JM, et al. Molecular signatures of quiescent, mobilized and leukemia-initiating hematopoietic stem cells. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8785.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Van’t Veer MB, Brooijmans AM, Langerak AW, Verhaaf B, Goudswaard CS, Graveland WJ, et al. The predictive value of lipoprotein lipase for survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica. 2006;91:56–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Damle RN, Wasil T, Fais F, Ghiotto F, Valetto A, Allen SL, et al. Ig V gene mutation status and CD38 expression as novel prognostic indicators in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1999;94:1840–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Baliakas P, Hadzidimitriou A, Sutton L-A, Rossi D, Minga E, Villamor N, et al. Recurrent mutations refine prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2015;29:329–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kienle D, Benner A, Läufle C, Winkler D, Schneider C, Bühler A, et al. Gene expression factors as predictors of genetic risk and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica. 2010;95:102–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zenz T, Fröhling S, Mertens D, Döhner H, Stilgenbauer S. Moving from prognostic to predictive factors in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2010;23:71–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Herold T, Jurinovic V, Metzeler KH, Boulesteix A-L, Bergmann M, Seiler T, et al. An eight-gene expression signature for the prediction of survival and time to treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2011;25:1639–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Haslinger C, Schweifer N, Stilgenbauer S, Döhner H, Lichter P, Kraut N, et al. Microarray gene expression profiling of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia subgroups defined by genomic aberrations and VH mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3937–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vasconcelos Y, De Vos J, Vallat L, Rème T, Lalanne AI, Wanherdrick K, et al. Gene expression profiling of chronic lymphocytic leukemia can discriminate cases with stable disease and mutated Ig genes from those with progressive disease and unmutated Ig genes. Leukemia. 2005;19:2002–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Oppezzo P, Vasconcelos Y, Settegrana C, Jeannel D, Vuillier F, Legarff-Tavernier M, et al. The LPL/ADAM29 expression ratio is a novel prognosis indicator in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2005;106:650–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Döhner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, Leupolt E, Kröber A, Bullinger L, et al. Genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1910–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bou Samra E, Klein B, Commes T, Moreaux J. Identification of a 20-gene expression-based risk score as a predictor of clinical outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:423174.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shukla A, Chaturvedi NK, Ahrens AK, Cutucache CE, Mittal AK, Bierman P, et al. Stromal Tumor Microenvironment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Regulation of Leukemic Progression. J Leuk. 2013;1:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Gasparini C, Celeghini C, Monasta L, Zauli G. NF-κB pathways in hematological malignancies. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:2083–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cuní S, Pérez-Aciego P, Pérez-Chacón G, Vargas JA, Sánchez A, Martín-Saavedra FM, et al. A sustained activation of PI3K/NF-kappaB pathway is critical for the survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells. Leukemia. 2004;18:1391–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu Z, Hazan-Halevy I, Harris DM, Li P, Ferrajoli A, Faderl S, et al. STAT-3 activates NF-κB in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2011;9:507–15.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu J, Zhou P, Wang W, Sun A, Guo F. RelB, together with RelA, sustains cell survival and confers proteasome inhibitor sensitivity of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells from bone marrow. J Mol Med. 2014;92:77–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zschiedrich I, Hardeland U, Krones-Herzig A, Berriel Diaz M, Vegiopoulos A, Müggenburg J, et al. Coactivator function of RIP140 for NFkappaB/RelA-dependent cytokine gene expression. Blood. 2008;112:264–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ho P-C, Tsui Y-C, Feng X, Greaves DR, Wei L-N. NF-κB-mediated degradation of the coactivator RIP140 regulates inflammatory responses and contributes to endotoxin tolerance. Nat Immunol. 2012;13:379–86.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Bigas A, Guiu J, Gama-Norton L. Notch and Wnt signaling in the emergence of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2013;51:264–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lu D, Zhao Y, Tawatao R, Cottam HB, Sen M, Leoni LM, et al. Activation of the Wnt signaling pathway in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:3118–23.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Thanendrarajan S, Kim Y, Schmidt-Wolf IG. Understanding and targeting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in chronic leukemia. Leuk Res Treatment. 2011;2011:329572.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Gutierrez A, Tschumper RC, Wu X, Shanafelt TD, Eckel-Passow J, Huddleston PM, et al. LEF-1 is a prosurvival factor in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is expressed in the preleukemic state of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. Blood. 2010;116:2975–83.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lu D, Choi MY, Yu J, Castro JE, Kipps TJ, Carson DA. Salinomycin inhibits Wnt signaling and selectively induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:13253–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Razavi R, Gehrke I, Gandhirajan RK, Poll-Wolbeck SJ, Hallek M, Kreuzer K-A. Nitric oxide-donating acetylsalicylic acid induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells and shows strong antitumor efficacy in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:286–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Maffei R, Bulgarelli J, Fiorcari S, Martinelli S, Castelli I, Valenti V, et al. Endothelin-1 promotes survival and chemoresistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells through ETA receptor. PLoS One. 2014;9:e98818.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Simonsson B, Terenius L, Nilsson K. Glucocorticoid receptors, clinical characteristics, and implications for prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer. 1982;49:2493–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tung S, Shi Y, Wong K, Zhu F, Gorczynski R, Laister RC, et al. PPARα and fatty acid oxidation mediate glucocorticoid resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2013;122:969–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Geyeregger R, Shehata M, Zeyda M, Kiefer FW, Stuhlmeier KM, Porpaczy E, et al. Liver X receptors interfere with cytokine-induced proliferation and cell survival in normal and leukemic lymphocytes. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86:1039–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Yakimchuk K, Norin S, Kimby E, Hägglund H, Warner M, Gustafsson J-Å. Up-regulated estrogen receptor β2 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53:139–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Li P-P, Wang X. Role of signaling pathways and miRNAs in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Chin Med J. 2013;126:4175–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Baldus CD, Liyanarachchi S, Mrózek K, Auer H, Tanner SM, Guimond M, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotypes and abnormal chromosome 21: amplification discloses overexpression of APP, ETS2, and ERG genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:3915–20.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Payton JE, Grieselhuber NR, Chang L-W, Murakami M, Geiss GK, Link DC, et al. High throughput digital quantification of mRNA abundance in primary human acute myeloid leukemia samples. J Clin Investig. 2009;119:1714–26.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Hasserjian RP. Acute myeloid leukemia: advances in diagnosis and classification. Int J Lab Hematol. 2013;35:358–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang R, Kim YM, Yang X, Li Y, Li S, Lee J-Y. A possible 5′-NRIP1/UHRF1-3′ fusion gene detected by array CGH analysis in a Ph + ALL patient. Cancer Genet. 2011;204:687–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Haferlach C, Bacher U, Grossmann V, Schindela S, Zenger M, Kohlmann A, et al. Three novel cytogenetically cryptic EVI1 rearrangements associated with increased EVI1 expression and poor prognosis identified in 27 acute myeloid leukemia cases. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012;51:1079–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Majumder MM, Kontro M, Edgren H, Nicorici D, Parsons A, Karjalainen R, et al. Abstract 3175: genomic and transcriptomic data integration in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia reveals a novel fusion gene involving onco-miR-125b-2. Cancer Res. 2012;72(8 Supplement):3175–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Bichi R, Shinton SA, Martin ES, Koval A, Calin GA, Cesari R, et al. Human chronic lymphocytic leukemia modeled in mouse by targeted TCL1 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6955–60.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Bertilaccio MTS, Scielzo C, Simonetti G, Ten Hacken E, Apollonio B, Ghia P, et al. Xenograft models of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: problems, pitfalls and future directions. Leukemia. 2013;27:534–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Jacoby E, Chien CD, Fry TJ. Murine models of acute leukemia: important tools in current pediatric leukemia research. Front Oncol. 2014;4:95.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lapierre et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement