Open Access

The roles of stem cell memory T cells in hematological malignancies

Journal of Hematology & Oncology20158:113

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-015-0214-5

Received: 6 August 2015

Accepted: 1 October 2015

Published: 14 October 2015

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) is rapidly migrating from bench to clinical therapy for hematological malignancies. Recently, a new subtype of memory T cells, stem cell memory T (TSCM) cells, was shown to be one of the most favorable subsets for ACT. TSCM has high self-renewal capacity and is associated with superior T cell engraftment, persistence, and antitumor immunity. In this review, we focused on the characteristics of antigen-specific TSCM cells and discussed their potential for immunotherapy targeting hematological malignancies.

Keywords

Stem cell memory T cellsAdoptive cell therapyHematological malignancyAntigen-specific T cells

Introduction

T cell immunodeficiencies have been observed in patients with hematological disorders [1]. These deficiencies lead to the expansion of malignant clones and are thought to play an important role in tumorigenesis [25]. To design an effective approach for recovering T cell immunity, particularly antigen-specific T cell immunity, it is necessary to accurately evaluate the T cell immune status at either the molecular or cellular level, including characteristics such as recent thymic output function, number of naive T cells, diversity in the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire, and tumor antigen-specific cytotoxicity T cell clones [69]. More recently, stem cell memory T (TSCM) cells have been described as a new immune biomarker for evaluating long-term memory T cell immune reconstitution, which is an important index after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) [1012]. TSCM cells have been shown to be able to differentiate into central memory T cells (TCM), effector memory (TEM), and terminal effector T cells (TTE).

Adaptive immunity is characterized by the ability to form long-lived immunological memory. Memory T cells develop when antigen-specific naive CD4+ or CD8+ T cells become activated upon antigen exposure and subsequently undergo proliferative expansion and differentiation [13, 14]. Therefore, efficient and persistent immune memory is essential for long-term protection against infections and malignancies. Memory T cells play a critical role in maintaining this immune defense [15]. TSCM cells are considered as an important immune marker for the repopulating T cell pool and immune reconstitution which is associated with favorable clinical outcome after HSCT [16]. TSCM cell research may support the advances in biomarker research, diagnosis, and therapy for hematological malignancies [1720]. Moreover, TSCM cell research may be important for understanding and influencing diverse chronic immune reactions, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) [21].

TSCM cell characteristics

Memory T cells (including CD4+ and CD8+ memory T cells) include several subtypes: stem cell memory (TSCM), central memory (TCM), transitional memory (TTM) (described only in CD4+ memory T cells), effector memory (TEM), and terminal effector (TTE) T cells [16, 22]. TSCM cells were first observed in a murine model of GVHD by Zhang et al., who reported a new subset of post-mitotic CD44loCD62LhiCD8+ T cells expressing Sca-1 (stem cell antigen 1), CD122, and Bcl-2. This population of T cells was able to generate and sustain all allogeneic T cell subsets in GVHD reactions. These alloreactive CD8+ T cells were demonstrated to have enhanced self-renewal capacity and multipotency. These cells are capable of differentiating into TCM, TEM, and TTE cells [14, 21]. In humans, an example came from the identification of a population of naive yellow fever (YF)-specific CD8+ T cells after vaccination. These cells were stably maintained for more than 25 years and were capable of ex vivo self-renewal. In-depth analysis of markers and genome-wide mRNA profiling have shown that these cells are distinct from genuine naive cells from unvaccinated donors and resemble the recently described stem cell-like memory subset TSCM [23]. Moreover, epigenetic analysis has also revealed that histone modifications and gene expression signatures could distinguish TSCM from other CD8+ T cell subsets [24]. Increasing data have supported the notion that the human TSCM subset is a clearly distinct subset in between the naive T cell (TN) and TCM subsets. Human TSCM cells have been described as a long-lived memory T cell population which are CD45RO, CCR7+, CD45RA+, CD62L+, CD27+, CD28+, and IL-7Rα+. These markers are characteristic of naive T cells. The immunophenotypic markers expressed in different T cell subtypes (from TN to TTE cells) are summarized in Table 1. TSCM cells express increased levels of CD95, IL-2Rβ, CXCR3, and LFA-1 and exhibit numerous functional attributes distinct from memory cells. However, human TSCM cells constitute only approximately 2–4 % of the total CD4+ and CD8+ T cell population in the periphery and can be identified by polychromatic flow cytometry based on the simultaneous expression of several naive markers together with the memory marker CD95 [25]. A linear T cell differentiation model and the minimum set of markers used for identifying and sorting TSCM are depicted in Fig. 1 [25].
Table 1

Summary of the expression of functional molecules in circulating naive, memory T cell and terminal effector T cell subsets

Subset

Phenotype

TN

CD45ROCCR7+CD45RA+CD62L+CD27+CD28+CD127+(IL-7Rα+)CD95CD103

TSCM

CD45ROCCR7+CD45RA+CD62L+CD27+CD28+CD127+(IL-7Rα+)CD95+CD103

TCM

CD45RO+CCR7+CD45RACD62L+CD28+CD27+CD127+(IL-7Rα+)CD95+CD103

TEM

CD45RO+CCR7CD45RACD62LCD28−/+CD27−/+CD127−/+(IL-7Rα−/+)CD95+CD103+

TTE

CD45ROCCR7CD45RA+CD62LCD28−/+CD27CD127(IL-7Rα)CD95+CD103

+” positive expression, “” negative expression, T N naive T cell, T SCM stem cell memory T cell, T CM central memory T cell, T EM effector memory T cell, T TE terminal effector T cell

Fig. 1

Schematic model for T cell differentiation. Upon activation, naive T cells differentiate into various memory and effector cells. Self-renewal capacity, multipotency, and proliferation potential decrease upon differentiation. The expression of CD45R0, CCR7, CD28, and CD95 markers changes during T cell differentiation from TN to TTE. The minimum set of canonical markers can be used to identify the five major subsets of T cells. T N naive T cell, T SCM stem cell memory T cell, T CM central memory T cell, T EM effector memory T cell, T TE terminal effector T cell

Self-renewing memory T cells may be regulated by shared signaling pathways such as those involved in hematopoietic stem cells or memory B cells. The Wnt-β-catenin pathway is an evolutionarily conserved pathway that regulates hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and multipotency by limiting stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Similarly, a key role for Wnt signaling during the maintenance of “stemness” in CD8+ TSCM cells was demonstrated by Gattinoni et al. It was shown that disrupting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by glycogen synthase-3β (GSK-3β) inhibitors promoted the generation of CD44lowCD62LhighSca-1highCD122highBcl-2high self-renewing multipotent CD8+ TSCM cells with proliferative and antitumor capacities that exceeded those of the TCM and TEM subsets [11, 26, 27]. In addition, antigen-specific TSCM cells were shown to preferentially reside in the lymph nodes (LNs) and less so in the spleen and bone marrow [28].

There are numerous factors that act as modulators regulating the maturation and activation of CD8+ T cells, for example, suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) is one of the key modulators [29]. Moreover, it has been reported that activation of naive T cells with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibody-conjugated beads in the presence of low doses of IL-7 and IL-15 promotes the generation of CD45RA+CD62L+CCR7+CD95+ TSCM cells [30].

Antigen-specific TSCM

It is well known that antigen-specific T cells are crucial components for antitumor or antivirus immunity in patients with hematological malignancies, particularly in patients after HSCT. It is possible that the number of antigen-specific TSCM cells may be the determining factor of immunity. However, there have been few reports on antigen-specific TSCM cells. Low frequency of these cells limits detailed characterization. For example, <1 % of total human T cells are defined as CD8+CD45RA+CCR7+CD127+CD95+ viral-specific TSCM cells. Human CMV-specific TSCM cells can be detected at frequencies similar to those observed in other subsets, with frequency around 1/10,000 T cells [31, 32].

Antigen-specific TSCM cells represent a long-lasting component of the cellular immune response to viruses and tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). For virus-specific TSCM cells, research has first focused on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific CD8+ TSCM cells. It is known that HIV-specific CD8+ T cells can influence HIV-1 disease progression during untreated HIV-1 infections, and recent data have shown that HIV-1-specific CD8+ TSCM cells are detectable in all stages of HIV-1 infection. These cells were found to be increased in number in patients receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy when compared with those untreated patients [33]. It was found that CD4+ TSCM cells were susceptible to HIV infection; thus, HIV-1 virus may exploit the stem cell characteristics of cellular immune memory T cells and lead to long-term viral persistence [34]. Similar findings were demonstrated in a study of human T cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1)-infected CD4+ TSCM cells in patients with adult T cell leukemia (ATL). This report first demonstrated an association between T cell malignancy and TSCM cells. TSCM cells from ATL patients were capable of sustaining themselves in a less proliferative mode, yet they were able to differentiate into other memory T cell populations during the rapidly propagating phase. These cells have been identified at the hierarchical apex capable of reconstituting identical ATL clones [35]. A decrease in the infection of CD4+ TSCM cells was found to preserve CD4+ T cell homeostasis and prevents disease progression despite significant viremia in both HIV-1 and HTLV-1 infections [36].

TSCM cells may play a major role in specific antitumor response and long-term immune surveillance directed against tumors [17, 37, 38]. In addition, TSCM cells have been proposed to be one of the key determinants of immune memory. It may be interesting to monitor the level of TSCM cells and its significance for immune reconstitution and prognosis of patients with hematological malignancies before and after therapy, particularly HSCT. There have been only a few studies on TAA-specific TSCM cells. Recently, dynamic changes of TSCM cells were longitudinally tracked in patients who underwent haploidentical HSCT. These studies demonstrated that donor-derived TSCM cells were highly enriched early after HSCT. TSCM cells can differentiate directly from naive precursors infused in the grafts. Through T cell receptor (TCR) gene analysis, TSCM cells have been found to have diversification in immune memory after allogeneic HSCT [10]. It was also demonstrated that the level of TSCM cells may be used to evaluate immune reconstitution in patients who received posttransplant cyclophosphamide (pt-Cy) for GVHD prophylaxis. Similarly, donor-derived TSCM cells were found to be the most abundant circulating T cell population in the early days following haploidentical HSCT and pt-Cy. These donor-derived TSCM cells preceded the expansion of effector cells. Antigen-specific TSCM cells generated detectable recall responses; thus, it has been proposed to explore TSCM cells derived from donor naive precursor cells in the clinical setting to overcome immunodeficiency [12]. With the ability to expand and differentiate into effectors capable of mediating potent xenogeneic GVHD in immunodeficient mice, these donor naive precursor-derived TSCM cells were noted to be superior to other memory lymphocytes. Furthermore, gene-modified TSCM cells were found to be the only T cell subset capable of expanding and mediating GVHD in serial transplantations [30]. These findings indicate negative aspects of TSCM cells for clinical application.

The potential of TSCM cells in immunotherapy for hematological malignancies

TSCM cells may be a novel and critical therapeutic resource because these cells have the potential to serve as a stable cellular vehicle. Two gene therapy clinical trials with gene-corrected hematopoietic stem cells provided a glimpse into this possibility. Long-term in vivo T cell reconstitution was characterized in these trials. Specifically, the investigators traced the fate of greater than 1700 individual T cell clones in patients who underwent gene therapy. The studies demonstrated that the TSCM cells persisted and preserved their precursor potential in humans for up to 12 years after the infusion of gene-corrected stem cells [39]. The demonstration of the safe, functional, and decade-long survival of the engineered TSCM cells in humans sets the stage for their clinical application. Since TSCM cells were shown to be capable of reconstituting the full repertoire of memory and effector T cells after HSCT, it is particularly attractive to use them for adoptive immunotherapies. TSCM cells might overcome current limitations, such as inefficient T cell engraftment, poor persistence, and inability to mediate prolonged immune attacks [1012, 40].

Even though potent antitumor activity of TSCM cells was demonstrated in preclinical animal tumor models [26, 27], it is currently not feasible to treat patients with naturally occurring TSCM cells because it is a scarce and small proportion of circulating lymphocytes. Therefore, strategies that can generate, expand, and enable the redirection of TSCM cells against cancer cells need to be defined. Cieri and colleagues have recently described that a large number of TSCM cells were generated by priming T cells with low doses of IL-7 and IL-15. It is therefore possible to generate, expand, and genetically engineer TSCM cells in vitro from naive precursors. Furthermore, the in vitro-generated TSCM cells displayed enhanced proliferative capacity upon adoptive transfer into immunodeficient mice, a finding consistent with those using naturally occurring TSCM cells [11, 30]. TSCM cells were also expanded from naive precursors by inhibiting Akt signaling during ex vivo priming and expansion. The Akt-inhibited minor histocompatibility antigen (MiHA)-specific CD8+ T cells had superior expansion capacity in vitro and induced superior antitumor activity in multiple myeloma-bearing immunodeficient mice. These findings provided a rationale for clinically exploiting ex vivo-generated, Akt-inhibited, MiHA-specific CD8+ T cells or TAA-specific CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy [41, 42]. Schmueck-Henneresse et al. also described a simplified culture protocol allowing for fast expansion of virus-specific TSCM cells from a mixed TN/TSCM pool of peripheral blood lymphocytes. This may be the basis for novel cell therapeutic options for life-threatening viral infections [31]. Among the known memory T cell subpopulations, the TSCM cell subset has profound implications for the design and development of effective vaccines as well as T cell-based therapies [13, 26, 28]. As immunotherapy plays increasingly important roles in cancer management, further exploration of TSCM cells and their regulation may facilitate clinical development of humoral (monoclonal antibodies and inhibitors of B cell receptor signaling) and cellular (CART) immunotherapies [40, 4347].

Conclusions and future perspectives

TSCM cells have the capacities of self-renewal and differentiation into various memory/effector subsets. These cells can lead to superior immune reconstitution. The identification of human TSCM cells is directly relevant for evaluating life-long cellular immune status, immune reconstitution after allogeneic HSCT, and design of vaccines and T cell immunotherapy. However, it remains unclear at this time whether the number of TSCM cells may be used as a standard biomarker for immune reconstitution after HSCT. In addition, the low number of TSCM cells in circulating lymphocytes is also limiting their application [11]. Strategies for in vitro and in vivo isolation and generation of highly effective antitumor TSCM cells are under intensive investigation.

Abbreviations

ACT: 

adoptive cell therapy

ATL: 

adult T cell leukemia

HTLV-1: 

human-cell leukemia virus type 1

MiHAs: 

minor histocompatibility antigens

TAA-CTL: 

tumor antigen associated cytotoxic T lymphocytes

TCM

central memory T cell

TCR: 

T cell receptor

TEM

effector memory T cell

TN

naive T cell

TSCM

stem cell memory T cell

TTE

terminal effector T cell

TTM

transitional memory T cell

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81270604), the collaborated grant for HK-Macao-TW of the Ministry of Science and Technology (2012DFH30060), the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (No. S2013020012863), the Foundation for High-Level Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong, China (No. [2013]246-54), the Guangzhou Science and Technology Project Foundation (No. 201510010211), and Jinan University’s Scientific Research Creativeness Cultivation Project for Outstanding Undergraduates Recommended for Postgraduate Study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Hematology, First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University
(2)
Institute of Hematology, Jinan University
(3)
Key Laboratory for Regenerative Medicine of Ministry of Education, Jinan University

References

  1. Ji X, Zhang L, Peng J, Hou M. T cell immune abnormalities in immune thrombocytopenia. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:72.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Muller-Schmah C, Solari L, Weis R, Pfeifer D, Scheibenbogen C, Trepel M, et al. Immune response as a possible mechanism of long-lasting disease control in spontaneous remission of MLL/AF9-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol. 2012;91:27–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Isidori A, Salvestrini V, Ciciarello M, Loscocco F, Visani G, Parisi S, et al. The role of the immunosuppressive microenvironment in acute myeloid leukemia development and treatment. Expert Rev Hematol. 2014;7:807–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Li Y. T-cell immune suppression in patients with hematologic malignancies: clinical implications. Int J Hematol Oncol. 2014;3:289–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Shi L, Chen S, Yang L, Li Y. The role of PD-1 and PD-L1 in T-cell immune suppression in patients with hematological malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2013;6:74.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Li Y, Yin Q, Yang L, Chen S, Geng S, Wu X, et al. Reduced levels of recent thymic emigrants in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58:1047–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen S, Huang X, Zheng H, Geng S, Wu X, Yang L, et al. The evolution of malignant and reactive gammadelta + T cell clones in a relapse T-ALL case after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:73.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen S, Zha X, Yang L, Li B, Liye Z, Li Y. Deficiency of CD3gamma, delta, epsilon, and zeta expression in T cells from AML patients. Hematology. 2011;16:31–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shi L, Chen S, Zha X, Xu Y, Xu L, Yang L, et al. Enhancement of the TCRzeta expression, polyclonal expansion, and activation of T cells from patients with acute myeloid leukemia after IL-2, IL-7, and IL-12 induction. DNA Cell Biol. 2015;34:481–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cieri N, Oliveira G, Greco R, Forcato M, Taccioli C, Cianciotti B, et al. Generation of human memory stem T cells after haploidentical T-replete hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2015;125:2865–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gattinoni L, Restifo NP. Moving T memory stem cells to the clinic. Blood. 2013;121:567–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Roberto A, Castagna L, Zanon V, Bramanti S, Crocchiolo R, McLaren JE, et al. Role of naive-derived T memory stem cells in T-cell reconstitution following allogeneic transplantation. Blood. 2015;125:2855–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Restifo NP, Gattinoni L. Lineage relationship of effector and memory T cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25:556–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chahroudi A, Silvestri G, Lichterfeld M. T memory stem cells and HIV: a long-term relationship. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12:33–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Crotty S, Ahmed R. Immunological memory in humans. Semin Immunol. 2004;16:197–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mateus J, Lasso P, Pavia P, Rosas F, Roa N, Valencia-Hernandez CA, et al. Low frequency of circulating CD8+ T stem cell memory cells in chronic chagasic patients with severe forms of the disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e3432.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Darlak KA, Wang Y, Li JM, Harris WA, Giver CR, Huang C, et al. Host bone marrow-derived IL-12 enhances donor T cell engraftment in a mouse model of bone marrow transplantation. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang L, Xiao H, Zhang X, Wang C, Huang H. The role of telomeres and telomerase in hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:61.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tibes R, Mesa RA. Targeting hedgehog signaling in myelofibrosis and other hematologic malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:18.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith AD, Roda D, Yap TA. Strategies for modern biomarker and drug development in oncology. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:70.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang Y, Joe G, Hexner E, Zhu J, Emerson SG. Host-reactive CD8+ memory stem cells in graft-versus-host disease. Nat Med. 2005;11:1299–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Takeshita M, Suzuki K, Kassai Y, Takiguchi M, Nakayama Y, Otomo Y, et al. Polarization diversity of human CD4(+) stem cell memory T cells. Clin Immunol. 2015;159:107–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuertes Marraco SA, Soneson C, Cagnon L, Gannon PO, Allard M, Abed Maillard S, et al. Long-lasting stem cell-like memory CD8+ T cells with a naive-like profile upon yellow fever vaccination. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:282ra248.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Crompton JG, Narayanan M, Cuddapah S, Roychoudhuri R, Ji Y, Yang W, et al. Lineage relationship of CD8 T cell subsets is revealed by progressive changes in the epigenetic landscape. Cell Mol Immunol 2015;doi:10.1038/cmi.2015.032.Google Scholar
  25. Mahnke YD, Brodie TM, Sallusto F, Roederer M, Lugli E. The who’s who of T-cell differentiation: human memory T-cell subsets. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43:2797–809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gattinoni L, Lugli E, Ji Y, Pos Z, Paulos CM, Quigley MF, et al. A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nat Med. 2011;17:1290–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gattinoni L, Zhong XS, Palmer DC, Ji Y, Hinrichs CS, Yu Z, et al. Wnt signaling arrests effector T cell differentiation and generates CD8+ memory stem cells. Nat Med. 2009;15:808–13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lugli E, Dominguez MH, Gattinoni L, Chattopadhyay PK, Bolton DL, Song K, et al. Superior T memory stem cell persistence supports long-lived T cell memory. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:594–9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Palmer DC, Restifo NP. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) in T cell differentiation, maturation, and function. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:592–602.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cieri N, Camisa B, Cocchiarella F, Forcato M, Oliveira G, Provasi E, et al. IL-7 and IL-15 instruct the generation of human memory stem T cells from naive precursors. Blood. 2013;121:573–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmueck-Henneresse M, Sharaf R, Vogt K, Weist BJ, Landwehr-Kenzel S, Fuehrer H, et al. Peripheral blood-derived virus-specific memory stem T cells mature to functional effector memory subsets with self-renewal potency. J Immunol. 2015;194:5559–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Di Benedetto S, Derhovanessian E, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Goldeck D, Muller L, Pawelec G. Impact of age, sex and CMV-infection on peripheral T cell phenotypes: results from the Berlin BASE-II Study. Biogerontology. 2015;16:631–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Vigano S, Negron J, Ouyang Z, Rosenberg ES, Walker BD, Lichterfeld M, et al. Prolonged antiretroviral therapy preserves HIV-1-specific CD8 T cells with stem cell-like properties. J Virol. 2015;89:7829–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Buzon MJ, Martin-Gayo E, Pereyra F, Ouyang Z, Sun H, Li JZ, et al. Long-term antiretroviral treatment initiated at primary HIV-1 infection affects the size, composition, and decay kinetics of the reservoir of HIV-1-infected CD4 T cells. J Virol. 2014;88:10056–65.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagai Y, Kawahara M, Hishizawa M, Shimazu Y, Sugino N, Fujii S, et al. T memory stem cells are the hierarchical apex of adult T-cell leukemia. Blood. 2015;125:3527–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Klatt NR, Bosinger SE, Peck M, Richert-Spuhler LE, Heigele A, Gile JP, et al. Limited HIV infection of central memory and stem cell memory CD4+ T cells is associated with lack of progression in viremic individuals. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004345.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Coulie PG, Van den Eynde BJ, van der Bruggen P, Boon T. Tumour antigens recognized by T lymphocytes: at the core of cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:135–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin PJ. Reversing CD8+ T-cell exhaustion with DLI. Blood. 2014;123:1289–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Biasco L, Scala S, Basso Ricci L, Dionisio F, Baricordi C, Calabria A, et al. In vivo tracking of T cells in humans unveils decade-long survival and activity of genetically modified T memory stem cells. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:273ra213.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Han EQ, Li XL, Wang CR, Li TF, Han SY. Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells for cancer immunotherapy: progress and challenges. J Hematol Oncol. 2013;6:47.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. van der Waart AB, van de Weem NM, Maas F, Kramer CS, Kester MG, Falkenburg JH, et al. Inhibition of Akt signaling promotes the generation of superior tumor-reactive T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Blood. 2014;124:3490–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. van der Waart AB, Hobo W, Dolstra H. Time to Akt: superior tumor-reactive T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4:e1003016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Akinleye A, Avvaru P, Furqan M, Song Y, Liu D. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors as cancer therapeutics. J Hematol Oncol. 2013;6:88.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Breton CS, Nahimana A, Aubry D, Macoin J, Moretti P, Bertschinger M, et al. A novel anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody (GBR 401) with high killing activity against B cell malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:33.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Akinleye A, Chen Y, Mukhi N, Song Y, Liu D. Ibrutinib and novel BTK inhibitors in clinical development. J Hematol Oncol. 2013;6:59.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Novero A, Ravella PM, Chen Y, Dous G, Liu D. Ibrutinib for B cell malignancies. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2014;3:4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Suresh T, Lee LX, Joshi J, Barta SK. New antibody approaches to lymphoma therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:58.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Xu et al. 2015