Challenges and new technologies in adoptive cell therapy

Zhang, Pengchao; Zhang, Guizhong; Wan, Xiaochun

doi:10.1186/s13045-023-01492-8

Review
Open access
Published: 18 August 2023

Challenges and new technologies in adoptive cell therapy

Pengchao Zhang^1,2,
Guizhong Zhang¹ &
Xiaochun Wan¹

Journal of Hematology & Oncology volume 16, Article number: 97 (2023) Cite this article

12k Accesses
18 Citations
7 Altmetric
Metrics details

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapies (ACTs) have existed for decades. From the initial infusion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to the subsequent specific enhanced T cell receptor (TCR)-T and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies, many novel strategies for cancer treatment have been developed. Owing to its promising outcomes, CAR-T cell therapy has revolutionized the field of ACTs, particularly for hematologic malignancies. Despite these advances, CAR-T cell therapy still has limitations in both autologous and allogeneic settings, including practicality and toxicity issues. To overcome these challenges, researchers have focused on the application of CAR engineering technology to other types of immune cell engineering. Consequently, several new cell therapies based on CAR technology have been developed, including CAR-NK, CAR-macrophage, CAR-γδT, and CAR-NKT. In this review, we describe the development, advantages, and possible challenges of the aforementioned ACTs and discuss current strategies aimed at maximizing the therapeutic potential of ACTs. We also provide an overview of the various gene transduction strategies employed in immunotherapy given their importance in immune cell engineering. Furthermore, we discuss the possibility that strategies capable of creating a positive feedback immune circuit, as healthy immune systems do, could address the flaw of a single type of ACT, and thus serve as key players in future cancer immunotherapy.

Introduction

Currently, immunotherapy methods based on immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy (ACT) have revolutionized cancer treatment. Immunotherapy has advantages over the three conventional therapies (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) in that it can stimulate the immune system to permanently eradicate residual or disseminated tumor cells and restore immune function that has been weakened by radiotherapy and chemotherapy [1, 2]. Following extensive clinical research, immunotherapy has demonstrated promising application potential in the management of various malignancies, with the potential to enhance therapeutic effect, prolong patient survival, and improve patient quality of life [2, 3].

ACT has recently received considerable attention due to the remarkable success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in the treatment of hematological malignancies. In contrast to chemotherapy, ACT is an active biological strategy that employs “live” drugs, whereby patient immune cells are collected, expanded, and engineered in vitro before being reinfused into the patient’s body to kill pathogens and/or cancer cells. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, engineered T cell receptor (TCR)-T cell therapy, and CAR-T cell therapy are the three primary ACTs. Among them, CAR-T therapy has received marketing approval and achieved considerable success in the treatment of hematological malignancies [4]. Additionally, researchers have expressed interest in the application of CAR engineering techniques to modify other immune cells. Consequently, a series of new ACTs based on CAR technology have been developed, including CAR-natural killer (NK), CAR-macrophage (M), CAR-γδT, and CAR-natural killer T (NKT). Clinical studies involving these methods are rapidly increasing, despite their advantages and drawbacks.

In this review, we provide an overview of several ACTs of current research interest, including TIL, TCR-T, CAR-T, CAR-NK, CAR-M, CAR-γδT, and CAR-NKT therapies. We discuss the advantages and challenges (and their potential solutions) of these therapies as well as the research being conducted in these areas. ACTs frequently involve the operation of gene transduction, which is often difficult for primary immune cells. Therefore, we also provide a summary of the numerous gene transduction techniques used in ACTs.

ACTs

TIL: founder of ACT

TILs are a group of lymphocytes that infiltrate into tumors, including T cells, NK cells, and others. These lymphocytes can recognize and destroy tumor cells as well as mobilize bystander immune cells to help combat the tumor. However, the lack of sufficient TILs and the dysfunction produced by the unfavorable tumor microenvironment (TME) frequently prevent TILs from performing their anti-tumor activity as well as they could. TIL therapy, a method based on TIL isolation, ex vivo expansion, and subsequent re-implantation, was developed and is being attempted to treat cancer.

Advantages

TIL therapy offers several unique advantages for treating solid tumors (Fig. 1): (1) TILs can circumvent the problem of heterogeneity of solid tumors because they are composed of T cells that target multiple antigens in cancer cells. (2) TILs, which are isolated from tumors, can easily infiltrate tumors because they already possess an appropriate chemokine receptor system. (3) As TILs are derived from patients, the reinfused TILs typically do not cause noticeable adverse effects, and no studies have reported off-target effects or cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in TIL therapy thus far.

Research progress

The use of autologous TILs in ACT to elicit tumor regression in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma was first demonstrated by Rosenberg et al. in 2002 [5]. Since then, numerous studies on TIL treatment have been conducted (Fig. 2A and Additional file 1), yielding encouraging clinical results. In three clinical trials for melanoma, Rosenberg et al. discovered that the objective response rate (ORR) of TIL treatment ranged from 49–72%, with 28% of patients achieving complete response (CR) [6]. Similarly, a phase 2 clinical trial utilizing TIL therapy for melanoma in 2016 revealed an ORR of 56% and a CR rate of 24% [7]. Additionally, TIL treatment was also shown to drive the regression of metastatic cervical cancer in a phase 2 clinical investigation (ORR = 33%) (NCT01585428) [8].

Challenges and potential solutions

TIL therapy has yet to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) owing to its numerous limitations (Figs. 1 and 2A). First, not all tumor tissues are suitable for isolating active lymphocytes that target tumor cells. Second, because a large number of lymphocytes are needed for TIL therapy, some patients with rapidly progressing diseases cannot wait for the isolated TIL to grow in vitro, which typically takes 2 months. Furthermore, TILs become exhausted from prolonged in vitro expansion, showing poor cytotoxicity and persistence [9]. Finally, because TIL therapy is entirely customized and cannot yield a universal product, it is challenging to maintain consistent TIL quality. To address the problem of T cell exhaustion, a new generation of TIL therapies has emerged, aiming to genetically modify TILs to improve their persistence and anticancer activity. For instance, it has been demonstrated in preclinical research that knocking out programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1) using gene editing technologies, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) or transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), can improve the anti-tumor effect of TIL therapy [10]. However, no solutions currently exist for the other limitations of TIL therapy. Nonetheless, TIL therapy is essential for demonstrating the anticancer potential of immune cell adoptive transfer therapy.

The limitations of TIL therapy have prompted researchers to explore more practical therapies. Scientists have discovered that TILs from different patients can recognize the same antigens that are highly expressed in tumor cells, such as MART-1 and glycoprotein 100 (gp100) [11]. A series of cell therapies were developed as a result of these discoveries, which brought classical TIL therapy into the era of precision targeting.

TCR-T: a sharp sword against solid tumors

TCR-T cell therapy is a process wherein normal T cells are transduced with antigen-specific TCR α and β chains to produce tumor-specific T cells, which are then amplified and reinfused into the body to specifically kill tumor cells. According to the clinical trial findings of Rosenberg et al. [12], genetically modified lymphocytes expressing multiple TCRs against specific tumor antigens (TCR-engineered T cells) have promising therapeutic potential for metastatic melanoma. Two of the 15 patients with melanoma in the trial demonstrated objective regression. This is the first study to show that TCR-T cells are feasible for cancer therapy, even though the result is not satisfactory.

Advantages

Although TCR-T cells are artificially created, their TCR structure is derived from naturally occurring T cells; consequently, they preserve many of the advantages of natural TCRs (Fig. 1). (1) With a complete TCR structure, TCR-T cells can fully mediate TCR signaling and recruit all costimulatory molecules and thus show potent anti-tumor activity. (2) TCR activation is dependent on the antigen presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Because MHC can present endogenous overexpressed antigens and neoantigens as well as foreign viral proteins and is unaffected by the subcellular localization of such antigens, TCR-T cell therapy is effective against a large target antigen pool. (3) Only a very small amount of target antigen is required to activate TCR, allowing engineered TCR-T cells to maintain their cytotoxicity against target cells with low antigen density [13].

Research progress

TCR-T cell therapy has recently received increased attention, and many studies are progressing to clinical trials as a result. Approximately 100 clinical trials of TCR-T cell therapy have been conducted thus far, although the majority are still in phase 1 or phase 2 (Fig. 2A and Additional file 1). Based on the advantages of TCR-T cell therapy, it has been clinically tested in many solid tumors such as melanoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, and cervical cancer. Robbins et al. reinfused NY-ESO-1 targeted TCR-T cells into 18 and 20 patients with synovial sarcoma and malignant melanoma, in 2015, and reported ORRs of 61% and 55%, respectively (NCT00670748) [14]. Furthermore, Rapoport et al. administered TCR-T cells targeting NY-ESO-1 to 20 patients with multiple myeloma, and 16 (80%) of them achieved clinical response (NCT01352286) [15].

Challenges and potential solutions

Although TCR-T cell therapy has achieved promising results in clinical trials, preclinical research and industrialization still face many challenges (Fig. 1). Consequently, clinical research on TCR-T cell therapy is advancing slower than expected.

1.
On-target off-tumor toxicity

The ideal cancer therapeutic target should have three important characteristics: tumor specificity, high immunogenicity, and high expression in tumor tissues [16]. Currently, TCR-T cell therapy focuses on three types of targets: (1) tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) that are highly expressed by tumor cells but not or only weakly expressed by normal cells, such as cancer-testis antigen [14], melanoma-associated antigen-4 (MAGE-A4), and mesothelin (Fig. 2B). However, TAA expression in some critical tissues cannot be entirely ruled out in practice, which frequently leads to intolerable toxicity. Otherwise, T cells undergo thymus negative selection, which eliminates lymphocytes with high affinity for self-antigens, resulting in the affinity of TCR targeting TAAs being low. Both of these limitations restrict the anti-tumor effectiveness of TCR-T cell therapy targeting TAAs. (2) Oncoviral antigens, such as E6 and E7 proteins of HPV16 (Fig. 2B), which are linked to vulvar, vaginal, and cervical cancer, can be naturally presented on the cell surface [17, 18], making them effective tumor therapeutic antigens. However, the applicability of such antigens is limited because human cancers caused by oncoviruses account for only 12% [19]. (3) Neoantigens generated by mutations [20], such as KRAS (G12V) and KRAS (G12D) mutant (Fig. 2B), which are closely related to pancreatic and colorectal cancers [21], are promising therapeutic targets. However, these neoantigens are rarely found in the natural world, and the technology for screening neoantigenic epitopes has not yet been developed [17].

Targeting inappropriate antigens with T cells can lead to serious and sometimes fatal toxicities, which have been observed in clinical trials. In 2009, Johnson et al. reinfused 20 and 16 patients with melanoma with TCR-T cells targeting MART-1 and gp100, respectively [22]. Although 30% and 19% of the patients achieved objective regression, the normal melanocytes of the skin, eyes, and ears were also attacked, causing serious harm to patients. A more serious case reported in 2013 was the trial conducted by Morgan et al. wherein MAGE-A3 (KVAELVHFL) was the target [23]. In this study, TCR-T cells also recognized the MAGE-A12 (KMAELVHFL) in the nervous system, which directly contributed to the deaths of two patients. These cases suggest that selecting an appropriate target is essential for ensuring the safety and efficacy of TCR-T cell therapy. Further research regarding the selection of tumor target antigens is required.

2.
Poor persistence

Before reinfusion, TCR-T cells should be expanded in vitro to a sufficient quantity, which often induces terminal differentiation [24]. Consequently, TCR-T cells frequently fail to mount a durable immune response in patients [9]. The major approaches currently used to address this issue involve either eliminating Treg and other immunosuppressive cells from the body or producing TCR-T cells using less differentiate T cells such as naïve T cells (Tn), stem cell-like memory T cells (Tscm), and central memory T cells (Tcm) [25].

3.
Expression and correct pairing of engineered TCR

The expression and assembly of engineered TCR may be affected by the competition between exogenous and endogenous TCR [26]. Studies have shown that the expression and activity of engineered TCR are improved after the endogenous TCR is precisely knocked down by small interfering RNAs (siRNA) [27]. Furthermore, because TCRs are heterodimers of α and β chains, there is a risk that the endogenous TCR chain may be mispaired with the exogenous chain. This might have undesirable effects, such as a reduction in the quantity and function of correctly paired exogenous TCR or, more seriously, the attacking of normal cells by mispaired TCR that has not undergone thymic negative selection [28]. Mispaired TCR-induced toxicity has been observed in vitro and in mouse models [29, 30]. However, this issue can be resolved by murinizing the constant region of exogenous TCR to avoid pairing with endogenous TCR [26], or by introducing more cysteine residues to the constant region of exogenous TCR α and β chains to increase their pairing efficiency [31]. Cloning engineered TCR into γδT cells may also be an effective approach because they do not express TCR α and β chains [32, 33].

4.
Unable to handle the constraints of the TME

The TME has a substantial impact on TCR-T cell function. In solid tumors, the expression of CXCL9 and other chemokines that recruit T cells is decreased, whereas the concentration of inhibitory cells and molecules is increased, creating an inhibitory immune milieu that substantially inhibits TCR-T cell activity [34]. Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors may help address this issue. In a mouse lung cancer model, Moon et al. combined TCR-T cells with PD-1 antibody and observed a significant increase in the anti-tumor efficacy of the TCR-T cells [35]. Additionally, the hypoxic and acidic environment present in solid tumors also constrains the function of TCR-T cells. An antacid drug called omeprazole can relieve the low pH environment present in tumors [36], which may increase the in vivo anti-tumor activity of TCR-T cells.

Clinical studies using TCR-T cell therapy have mainly focused on treating solid tumors, including melanoma, colon cancer, and synovial cell sarcoma, and have shown promising outcomes. However, some of the problems with this therapy require attention. Finding specific targets remains a crucial task in this area. Simultaneously, similar to other immune cell therapies, TCR-T cell therapy must also overcome challenges such as the immunosuppressive TME and poor infiltration and persistence. These challenges severely restrict the use of TCR-T cell therapy in clinical settings.

CAR-T: great success, but many challenges remain

T cells can recognize antigens as peptides presented by MHC via TCR; however, tumor cells frequently downregulate the expression of MHC-I molecules to evade T cell recognition. CAR was developed to circumvent this constraint. Currently, the application potential of T cell therapy has increased due to the development of CAR-T cell therapy. Similar to TCR-T cell therapy, CAR-T cell therapy uses gene transduction techniques (retrovirus, lentivirus, non-viral vector, etc.) to confer T cells the ability to precisely attack tumors by introducing antigen-specific CAR molecules into them. However, because of differences in their structural makeup and antigen-recognition mechanisms, CAR and TCR function differently.

Structure of CAR

The function of CAR-T cells is determined by the structure of the CAR molecule, which, in contrast to that of TCR, is designed rather than produced naturally. The following are the four main components of CAR (Fig. 3A):

1.
Extracellular target-binding domain

This domain, which can employ a single-chain variable fragment (scFv), nanobody, or ligand of the target, confers targeting specificity to CAR-T cells. In addition to specificity, the binding affinity of this domain to the target is another key factor affecting how well a CAR performs. Overly low or high affinities will not produce the desired results [37]. Moreover, charge density [38], epitope location [39], and target antigen density [40] must also be considered while designing a CAR.

2.
Hinge domain

The hinge domain is located extracellularly and serves as a link connecting the target-binding domain with the transmembrane domain. Recent studies have indicated that it also has an impact on CAR function. Because the target may be located proximally or distally to the plasma membrane, the hinge length can affect the binding of the CAR molecule to the target at different spatial positions [41]. Therefore, CAR molecules should be created with an appropriate hinge length for the specific target antigens.

3.
Transmembrane domain

The main function of the transmembrane domain is to anchor the CAR to the plasma membrane. However, recent studies have shown that it can also have an impact on the expression and stability of CAR, affect the formation of immune synapse, and be associated with the dimerization of endogenous signaling molecules [42, 43].

4.
Intracellular signal domain

This domain employs both signal transduction and costimulatory domains to transmit activation signals to T cells. The signal transduction domain is typically CD3ζ or immunoglobulin Fc receptor FcεRIγ, which contains immunoreceptor tyrosine activation motifs and can thus mimic the signal transduction function of TCR. Costimulatory domains are usually derived from the CD28 receptor family (CD28, ICOS) or the tumor necrosis factor receptor family (4-1BB, OX40, CD27) and can synergize costimulatory molecules to enhance intracellular activation signals [44, 45].

Development of CAR

A number of CAR-based cell therapies have been developed to date with the ongoing optimization of CAR structure. Here, we use CAR-T cell therapy as the representative to introduce how CAR-based cell therapy has evolved (Fig. 3).

1.
First-generation CAR

Eshhar was a pioneer in developing the first generation of CAR-T cell therapy. In 1997, he implanted T cells with a specific scFv coupled to intracellular CD3ζ, the prototype of CAR (Fig. 3B), to bypass the MHC restrictions of TCR. However, the therapeutic application of the first-generation CAR-T was not ideal because T cells often become exhausted due to a lack of costimulatory signals [46].

2.
Second-generation CAR

Second-generation CAR was developed by June et al., who introduced 4-1BB as a costimulatory domain into first-generation CAR (Fig. 3C). The eight CAR-T cell therapies that have been made commercially available thus far are all second-generation therapies (Table 1). Recent findings have demonstrated that patients treated with second-generation CD19 CAR-T cells not only achieve complete remission but also maintain CAR-T cells in vivo for up to 10 years following therapy, demonstrating that the costimulatory domain has greatly improved the persistence of CAR-T cells [47]. The ongoing presence of CAR-T cells in vivo facilitates long-term monitoring and elimination of tumor cells.

3.
Third-generation CAR

Table 1 Marketed CAR-T cell therapies

Full size table

Third-generation CAR contains two costimulatory domains, such as CD28/4-1BB and CD28/OX40 (Fig. 3D). However, although third-generation CAR-T cell therapy outperformed second-generation CAR-T cell therapy in terms of persistence and amplification, it failed to demonstrate superior anti-tumor activity in vivo against hematologic malignancies [48,49,50]. Therefore, second-generation therapies remain the most commonly utilized therapies. These studies also demonstrate that, at least in the treatment of hematologic tumors, the addition of costimulatory molecules does not always result in increased CAR function. However, third-generation CAR may prove advantageous in the treatment of solid tumors, which contain complicated microenvironments that severely limit T cell activation and persistence.

4.
Next-generation CAR

Current CAR-T cells remain incapable of treating solid tumors. The following issues need to be resolved to further improve CAR-T cell performance: (1) Trafficking: how to localize and enter the tumor tissue; (2) recognition: how to accurately identify tumor cells without harming normal cells; (3) persistence: how to maintain long-term proliferation and anti-tumor ability in vivo; (4) TME resistance: how to resist the inhibition of TME; (5) safety: how to reduce the occurrence of CRS, neurotoxicity (NT), and other side effects; and (6) universality: make CAR-T an off-the-shelf product (Fig. 4). To meet these requirements, researchers have proposed a number of new CAR designs based on the theory of synthetic biology, which we collectively refer to as “next-generation CAR.”

4.1
Logic gates

Based on the theory of engineering, researchers have introduced a series of “circuits” to conventional CAR, termed logic-gate CAR. The activation of logic-gate CAR-T cell therapy relies on a comprehensive signal mediated by multiple activating/inhibitory antigens, which is beneficial to improve the accurate recognition and overcome the heterogeneity of tumor cells. Currently, the logic gates used in CAR-T cell therapy mainly include “OR”, “AND”, and “AND-NOT” loops (Fig. 3Ea–Ec). Each logic gate has a different efficacy and can be modified depending on the actual situation.

(1)
“OR” logic gate

The simplest method for achieving the “OR” logic gate is via infusion of different CAR-T cell products targeting multiple antigens (cocktail treatment). For example, in clinical trials, CAR-T cells targeting EGFR and CD133 together prolonged the survival time of patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma [51], and the combination of anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 CAR-T cells also improved the survival time of patients with relapsed B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia [52]. However, generating multiple types of CAR-T cells increase the workload for researchers and requires more extensive investigation into potential toxicities. Another approach to creating an “OR” logic gate is to use a tandem CAR, which has more than two scFvs or other antigen-recognition motifs in the extracellular domain and can be activated by either of the TAAs. Tandem CAR-T cells targeting CD19/CD20 [53] and CD19/CD22 [54] showed good clinical efficacy in patients with B cell malignancies. Furthermore, CD19/CD20/CD22-targeting CAR-T cells (duoCAR) have shown therapeutic potential for antigen-heterogeneous B cell tumors [55, 56]. However, with the increase in target TAAs, safety needs to be carefully considered. Wong et al. developed a split, universal, and programmable (SUPRA) CAR system that enabled multiple logical controls in CAR-T cells. In the SUPRA CAR system, the CAR is split into two parts: zipCAR and zipFv. zipCAR is located on the cell membrane, and its extracellular domain is a leucine zipper. zipFv is a free scFv fused with a homologous leucine zipper and thus can bind complementarily to zipCAR to form a complete CAR. The SUPRA CAR system can easily switch CAR-T cells to different logic gates using different zipCAR/zipFv pairs. For instance, adding two zipFvs simultaneously to the SUPRA CAR system can rapidly create an OR logic gate, allowing CAR-T cells to potentially target multiple antigens [57]. However, the short half-life of zipFv in vivo limits the application of the SUPRA CAR system.

(2)
“AND” logic gate

Few solid tumors can be recognized by a single antigen, and multiple TAAs in combination can more accurately distinguish tumor cells from normal cells. The “AND” logic gate enables CAR-T cells to function only when two TAAs are recognized, which is beneficial for avoiding damage to normal tissues. In the split CAR, the signal domain (CD3ζ) and costimulatory domain (4-1BB or CD28) are separated into two receptors that each recognize a distinct TAA. CAR-T cells obtain complete activation signals only when both TAAs are recognized [58,59,60]. In a mouse model of prostate cancer, split CAR-T cells targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) only attacked target cells expressing both TAAs [58]. However, it must be noted that the CD3ζ-bearing receptor in this design is equivalent to a first-generation CAR, and the binding of this receptor to the antigen alone may cause leaky activation and accelerated exhaustion of CAR-T cells.

Lim et al. developed a novel “AND” logic gate to avoid leaked activation of split CARs. Inspired by the unique function of Notch receptors, they constructed a constitutively expressed synthetic Notch receptor (synNotch) to recognize antigen A, whose activation can release transcription factors to initiate the expression of CAR targeting antigen B. The CAR-T cells enter killing mode when antigen B is recognized [61,62,63,64,65]. In a mouse model inoculated with single-antigen tumors on the left side and double-antigen tumors on the right side, synNotch CAR-T cells only killed double-antigen expressing tumors, but had no effect on tumor cells expressing a single antigen [61]. Although this system can identify tumor cells more accurately, there is an approximately 24 h interval from synNotch activation to CAR activation, which may limit its application [61]. Lim et al. also demonstrated that synNotch CAR-T cells activated by antigen A-positive target cells in the brain of mice had no effect on antigen B–positive target cells inoculated in the abdomen, indicating that synNotch CAR-T cell killing activity was spatially limited [64]. However, for hematological tumors or tumors that metastasized in the blood, the safety of the synNotch system needs to be further explored.

The SUPRA CAR system can also implement “AND” logic control. Using two sets of leucine zips, RR zipCAR (containing RR leucine zipper) and FOS zipCAR (containing human FOS derived zipper domains) were equipped with the costimulatory domain and CD3ζ, respectively. Anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) zipFv bound to FOS zipCAR, and anti-Axl zipFv bound to RR zipCAR to form a split CAR. Changing the concentration of each zipFv regulated the intensity of signal output from each receptor [57].

Although the above “AND” logic gates have considerably improved the recognition of tumor cells, leakage still occurs because after the CAR-T cells are activated by antigen A, any cell expressing antigen B can be attacked. Recently, Majzner et al. developed a straightforward, instantaneous, reversible, and leak-free “AND” logic gate based on the current understanding of T cell signaling network. They found that a similar function could be achieved by replacing the intracellular 4-1BB/CD3ζ of the CAR with ZAP-70, which requires linker for activation of T cells (LAT) and SLP-76 for downstream signaling. Therefore, they replaced the two intracellular domains of CAR that recognize both antigens with LAT and SLP-76. After optimization, the generated logic-gated intracellular network (LINK) CAR completely avoided on-target/off-tumor toxicity, and only killed double-positive target cells regardless of the presence or absence of single-positive cells. This showed that the LINK CAR system is safer than synNotch CAR and SUPRA CAR in terms of maintaining an on-target killing effect [66].

(3)
“AND-NOT” logic gate

Damage to normal tissues may also be avoided by delivering inhibitory signals with antigens expressed on non-tumor cells. The “AND-NOT” logic gate enables the presence of both activation CAR and inhibition CAR (iCAR) on the surface of CAR-T cells. iCAR typically fuses scFv recognizing a non-tumor antigen to the intracellular domain of an immune checkpoint molecule such as CTLA-4 or PD-1. When iCAR recognizes the antigen, it inhibits the activation of CAR-T cells. In a preclinical study, the activation CAR recognized CD19 and the iCAR recognized PSMA; iCAR-T cells did not kill the target cells expressing both CD19 and PSMA, and the inhibitory effect of iCAR was reversible [67]. The SUPRA CAR system can implement the “AND-NOT” logic gate by using competitive zipFvs. In one example, anti-Axl zipFv competitively blocked the binding of anti-Her2 zipFv to zipCAR, thereby weakening the CAR-T cell attack on Axl⁺/Her2⁺ cells [57].

4.2
Adaptor-dependent

This class of CARs relies on the addition of exogenous ligands and can control the recognition of single or multiple TAAs (Fig. 3Ed). For example, avidin is linked to an extracellular segment of CAR (named biotin-binding immune receptor, BBIR) that can only function when biotinylated antibodies targeting tumor cells are present, and different biotinylated antibodies can be used to target multiple antigens [68, 69]. Similarly, combining anti-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) CAR and FITC-conjugated TAA-targeting antibodies endows CAR-T cells with the function of multi-target recognition [70,71,72,73]. In one study, fragment crystallizable gamma receptor (FcγR) was substituted for CAR to confer an antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC)-like function to engineered T cells. The advantage of this design was the ability to use a clinically approved therapeutic TAA as an adapter [74]. In the SUPRA CAR system, the leucine zipper motif is used to match zipCAR to free zipFv, which also enables CAR-T cells to be activated only in the presence of zipFv. Multiple antigens can be targeted by adding different zipFvs [57].

4.3
Pharmacologic switch

CAR-T cells in vivo may cause fatal side effects if they are out of control, and adverse events such as CRS and NT occur frequently in clinical treatment. To make CAR-T cells a controlled product, researchers have introduced several pharmacologic switch elements (Fig. 3Ee).

(1)
On-switch

Some CARs function only when a drug is administered. In the Tet-ON system, doxycycline acts as a switch mediator, and reverse tetracycline transcriptional activator (rtTA) can induce CAR expression only in the presence of doxycycline. CAR-T cells targeting CD147 [75], CD19 [76], or CD38 [77] developed based on the Tet-ON system have shown promising anti-tumor effects in vitro or in mouse models. However, because the regulation of CAR by this system occurs at the mRNA level, the control is hysteretic. Bian et al. demonstrated that the expression level of CAR regulated by the Tet-ON system reached the highest level 24 h after doxycycline administration and returned to the baseline value within 48 h after doxycycline removal [75], indicating that this system is not suitable for the situation of CAR-related acute fatal side effects. Additionally, it is necessary to monitor the possibility of antibiotic resistance caused by doxycycline treatment in the clinic. Another method of pharmacological control focuses on costimulatory signals. The small molecule drug rimiducid can dimerize the inducible MyD88/CD40 (iMC) and activate NF-κB to transmit costimulatory signals. In the absence of rimiducid, such CAR-T cells only exhibit first-generation CAR functions and cannot be fully activated. However, in the presence of rimiducid, iMC CAR-T cells show stronger anti-tumor effects than the traditional second- and third-generation CAR treatments [78].

(2)
Off-switch

Another strategy to control CAR-T is to induce drugs to turn off CAR signaling or induce CAR-T cell suicide when danger occurs. Duchateau et al. proposed a small molecule protease-based regulation strategy (SWIFF CAR) by sequentially fusing a protease target site, a protease, and a protein degradation component (degron) behind the CAR molecule. Under normal conditions, the protease target site was cleaved and the intact CAR was released. When the exogenous small molecule protease inhibitor asunaprevir was administered, the degron-linked CAR was reversibly degraded. However, this system is also hysteretic, and it can reduce the expression of CAR but cannot completely eliminate its function [79]. Hudecek et al. found that dasatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor clinically approved for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous and acute lymphoblastic leukemias inhibits CD3ζ signaling by interfering with lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase. In a mouse model, dasatinib rapidly and reversibly prevented CAR-T cell activation and alleviated CAR-T induced CRS, suggesting that dasatinib may be used as an emergency drug to prevent fatal CRS in CAR-T cell treatment [80]. Furthermore, researchers have added a rimiducid-activatable caspase-9 fusion protein to the CAR (iCasp9 CAR) and shown that the activation of caspase-9 leads to CAR-T cell apoptosis. The safety of iCasp9 CAR-T cells has been demonstrated in clinical trials [81]. For patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD) and CRS after receiving allogeneic CAR-T cells, 90% of iCasp9 CAR-T cells were eliminated within 30 min of rimiducid administration, thus preventing the potentially fatal risk [81, 82]. Another approach to deplete CAR-T cells is to force them to express elimination markers such as CD20 and truncated EGFR (loss of intracellular domain). CAR-T cells can be labeled with rituximab (targeting CD20) [83,84,85] or cetuximab (targeting truncated EGFR) [86], resulting in CAR-T cell elimination by ADCC and complement-dependent cytotoxicity pathways. This approach is advantageous in that clinically approved therapeutic antibodies can be used; however, the slow clearance of CAR-T cells precludes its application in emergency situations.

4.4
Secretion

Arming CAR-T cells to secrete functional molecules that enhance persistence, specificity, and infiltration may further improve their effects on solid tumors (Fig. 3Ef).

Bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) consist of two reverse linked scFvs, one targeting TAA and the other typically targeting CD3ζ, that mediate the attachment of T and tumor cells. BiTEs can effectively mobilize bystander T cells and avoid antigen escape. In a mouse leukemia model, anti-CD19 CAR-T cells that secreted CD3/CD19 BiTE exhibited enhanced anti-tumor activity due to mobilization of bystander T cells [87]. In the neuroblastoma, EGFRvIII is a highly specific tumor neoantigen, whereas EGFR is a TAA that is highly expressed in both tumor cells and many normal tissues. EGFRvIII-targeting CAR-T cells caused EGFRvIII-negative escape. However, EGFRvIII-targeting CAR-T cells that secreted CD3/EGFR BiTE lacked this defect. EGFRvIII provided a homing signal for CAR-T cells, and the activated CAR-T cells secreted CD3/EGFR BiTE and mobilized bystander T cells against tumor cells with high EGFR expression [88]. Furthermore, CD3/Fn14 BiTE [89], CD3/B7-H3 BiTE [90], CD3/EGFR BiTE, and CD3/IL13Rα2 BiTE [91] have also shown promising results in preclinical studies of glioblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, although CD3/CD19 BiTE blinatumomab is currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia [92], clinical trials have shown that serious side effects may occur [93]. Therefore, the combination of BiTEs and CAR-T cells should be carefully considered for safety.

Many cytokines can promote T cell proliferation, maintain T cell stemness, and improve the TME. To overcome antigen escape and inhibitory signals in the TME, CAR-T cells can be engineered to secrete activity-enhancing cytokines, and may also induce an endogenous anti-tumor response by remodeling the TME. Researchers have explored a number of cytokines to arm CAR-T cells, known as T cells redirected for universal cytokine-mediated killing (TRUCK). For example, Brentjens et al. showed that CAR-T cells continuously expressing IL-12 exhibit strong proliferation and PD-L1 inhibitory signal resistance in mouse ovarian cancer models, mediate the depletion of tumor-associated macrophages, and significantly prolong the survival time of tumor-bearing mice [94, 95]. This IL-12-secreting CAR-T is currently undergoing clinical trials (NCT02498912) [96]. Moreover, CAR-T cells secreting IL-7 [97], IL-12 [98,99,100,101], IL-15 [102,103,104,105,106,107], IL-18 [108,109,110], IL-33 [111], and IL-36γ [112] have also exhibited improved persistence or anti-tumor ability in preclinical or clinical trials; however, the continuous expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12 may lead to systemic toxicity [113, 114]. In contrast, the synNotch system developed by Lim et al. achieved regulation of cytokine release and has exhibited ideal results [115]. Xu et al. found that the autocrine IL-23 signal also enhanced the persistence and anti-tumor ability of CAR-T, with fewer side effects than CAR-T cells secreting IL-15 or IL-18 [116].

The extracellular matrix (ECM) of tumor tissue is one of the main factors limiting the infiltration of CAR-T cells. Secreted ECM-degrading enzymes can enhance CAR-T cell infiltration in solid tumors. Dotti et al. modified CAR-T cells to express heparanase, which can degrade heparan sulfate proteoglycans, the main components of the ECM. Anti-disialoganglioside (GD2) CAR-T cells expressing heparanase showed enhanced infiltration in solid tumors and were associated with significantly prolonged survival time in mice [117]. However, in a clinical trial, treatment with the pegylated form of ECM-degrading enzyme hyaluronidase increased the occurrence of thromboembolic events and reduced the overall survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [118], suggesting that ECM-degrading enzyme-expressing CAR-T cells may cause fatal side effects.

CAR-T cells have also been engineered to secrete antibodies targeting PD-L1 to enhance the clearance of PD-L1-expressing tumors through ADCC [119]. Similarly, the secretion of anti-PD-1 scFv by CAR-T cells can block the inhibitory signal of the TME and enhance the anti-tumor effect [120].

Furthermore, the interaction of herpes virus entry mediator (HVEM) and B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) generates inhibitory signals. Although the loss of HVEM leads to B cell proliferation and the development of germinal center lymphoma, CAR-T cells can deliver the extracellular portion of HVEM to the tumor site to restore inhibitory BTLA signaling and kill lymphoma cells. This shows that CAR-T can also function as drug delivery vectors [121].

CAR-T can also act as a drug delivery vector by secreting exosomes. Exosomes have many biological functions as mediators of intercellular communication and molecular transfer. Owing to their small size, exosomes can effectively cross the barrier of solid tumors and have shown potential in the treatment of solid tumors. Minn et al. engineered CAR-T cells to secrete exosomes carrying the stimulatory RNA RN7SL1 and reported promising therapeutic effects in solid tumor models [122]. RN7SL1 has many functions and was found to promote expansion and effector memory differentiation and enhance the function and persistence of CAR-T cells. Moreover, exosomes containing RN7SL1 selectively transferred to immune cells, restricted myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) development, reduced the expression of inhibitory cytokine TGF-β in myeloid cells, and promoted the costimulatory phenotype of dendritic cells (DCs). Moreover, equipping these exosomes with peptide antigens can mobilize endogenous immune cells to attack tumor cells with CAR antigen loss [122]. Therefore, multi-armed CAR-T cells secreting RN7SL1-carrying exosomes can effectively infiltrate tumors, improve the TME, mobilize bystander immune cells and provide them with antigens, and significantly improve the efficacy of anti-solid tumors [122]. Furthermore, exosomes secreted by CAR-T cells have many advantages, such as containing surface CAR but not PD-1 and containing perforin and granzyme B without the risk of CRS. Therefore, these exosomes can target and clear tumor cells similarly to parental T cells but are not limited by TME, and they exhibit good safety. This makes purified exosomes derived from CAR-T a promising tool for the treatment of solid tumors [123, 124].

4.5
TME response

In addition to immunosuppressive cells and cytokines, the TME is characterized by several other abnormal physical factors, such as acidity (pH 6.0–6.9) [125] and hypoxia (O₂ < 2%) [126], which also limit the anti-tumor effect of immune cells [127,128,129]. However, new functions of CAR-T can be developed by taking advantage of these abnormal physical factors. TME response CAR can limit the activation and distribution of CAR-T cells to limit systemic on-target/off-tumor toxicity (Fig. 3Eg). For example, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) contains an oxygen-dependent degradation domain (ODD), and fusing the ODD to the CAR molecule can mediate CAR degradation under normoxic conditions. Consequently, the CAR is only expressed in the hypoxic TME, reducing the damage to many normal tissues [130, 131]. Based on the oxygen-concentration-sensing characteristic of HIF-1α [132], Xu et al. introduced ODD into CAR and added hypoxia response elements (HREs) before the gene encoding CAR, achieving hypoxia-induced high expression and normoxia-mediated degradation of CAR [133]. CAR-T cells that sense an acidic environment are also in development. After screening a series of scFvs targeting HER2, Frost et al. obtained one with the best recognition activity in an acidic environment and constructed a pH-sensitive CAR-T that functioned only in an acidic TME, resulting in the regression of HER2-positive tumors in a mouse model [134]. However, it should be noted that some non-malignant tissues may share the physical characteristics of the TME, such as the physiologically hypoxic renal medulla and intestinal mucosa [135, 136] and the acidic gastric mucosa. Therefore, TME-responsive CARs also need to respond to highly specific TAAs or act in combination with other designs that improve specificity to avoid attacking normal tissues.

4.6
Other membrane protein modifications

In addition to the above designs, many other membrane protein modification schemes have been developed (Fig. 3Eh). For instance, IL-2 is generally used to stimulate the survival and expansion of CAR-T cells in vitro, but the administration of natural IL-2 in vivo can also cause indiscriminate activation of other immune cells such as NK and T cells, which may cause unpredictable side effects [137, 138]. Therefore, researchers have modified the IL-2/IL-2Rβ pair to design an orthogonal IL-2/IL-2Rβ system [139, 140]. The modified IL-2 can only activate CAR-T cells expressing the modified IL-2Rβ and do not react to native IL-2Rβ, thus avoiding non-specific activation. Moreover, the modified IL-2Rβ can only be activated by the modified IL-2 but has no response to natural IL-2, enabling precise regulation of orthogonal CAR-T cells in vivo. CAR-T with an orthogonal IL-2/IL-2Rβ system has been demonstrated to achieve complete response in a mouse refractory lymphoma model, and the number of CAR-T cells can be controlled to avoid CRS [139, 140]. Hirano et al. introduced IL-2Rβ and STAT3 binding motif (YXXQ) to the intracellular domain of a second-generation CAR. Owing to the addition of cytokine-mediated activation signals (JAK/STAT), this novel CAR-T cell showed better proliferation and anti-tumor activity than the unmodified second-generation CAR and prevented terminal differentiation in mice [141].

As tumor cells can secrete chemokines, the corresponding chemokine receptors can be used to enhance the homing of CAR-T cells to tumor tissues. For example, human HCC tumor tissues and cell lines express high levels of CXCR2 ligands, whereas T cells lack CXCR2. Therefore, Lin et al. introduced CXCR2 into CAR-T cells and found that they significantly enhanced their infiltration in HCC tissues relative to that of CAR-T without CXCR2 [142]. Furthermore, studies have shown that NSCLC tumor tissues highly express the chemokine MCP-1, while its receptors CCR2b and CCR4 are expressed at low levels on activated T cells. Zhu et al. constructed CAR-T cells expressing CCR2b to enhance the infiltration and anti-tumor function of CAR-T cells [143]. Similarly, CAR-T cells carrying colony-stimulating factor (CSF)-1R [144], CCR4 [145], and CCR2b [146, 147] have also shown promising results in various solid tumor models in preclinical studies. However, this requires high specificity of the chemokine, and more studies are needed to ensure that the chemokine receptor system will not cause CAR-T cells to target normal tissues.

Researchers have constructed a series of modified membrane receptors to block inhibitory signals for CAR-T cells. For example, CAR-T cells are forced to express PD-1 [148] or TGF-β receptors [149] that lack intracellular signaling domains (dominant-negative receptors). These receptors can competitively bind to PD-L1 or TGF-β but do not transmit inhibitory signals, thus enhancing the persistence of CAR-T cells and their ability to resist the TME. CAR-T cells expressing modified dominant-negative Fas blocked FasL-mediated apoptosis in the TME and also improved resistance to the TME [150].

Furthermore, modified membrane proteins can also convert inhibitory signals to activating signals (switch receptor). For example, the extracellular and intracellular domains of PD-1 and CD28, respectively, can be fused to transmit activation signals when stimulated by PD-L1 [151]. In clinical trials, anti-CD19 CAR-T expressing a PD-1/CD28 switch receptor was administered to patients with R/R B cell lymphoma, resulting in an overall response rate of 58.8% and a CR rate of 41.2% [152]. Similarly, switch receptors that fuse the extracellular domain of inhibitory IL-4R with activating IL-7R [153, 154], IL-2Rβ [155], or IL-21R [156] have also been shown to maintain the pro-inflammatory phenotype of CAR-T cells while exhibiting good TME resistance. However, it should be noted that excessive activation of CAR-T cells may cause side effects such as CRS and NT.

CD40 can be expressed in antigen-presenting cells (APCs), fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and certain hematopoietic and epithelial tumor cells. CAR-T cells expressing CD40 ligand (CD40L) can not only directly enhance the killing of CD40-positive tumor cells but also activate APCs and mobilize other endogenous immune cells to participate in anti-tumor responses and avoid tumor immune escape [157, 158].

Another promising design to enhance the temporal and spatial controllability of CAR-T is the regulation of CAR-T cells using light. Zhou et al. separated the intracellular signal domains of traditional CAR and fused them with optical dimer sensing elements so that they could be assembled into a complete CAR only when exposed to blue light. After extensive screening, they found that light-oxygen-voltage domain 2 (LOV2)-based optical dimers could mediate optimal light regulation, and therefore designed light-switchable CAR (LiCAR). In subsequent cytotoxic assays, LiCAR-T cells lysed target cells only in the presence of both tumor antigen and blue light. However, the ability of blue light to penetrate tissues is poor. To improve the clinical applicability of this technology, the researchers integrated upconversion nanoplates (UCNPs), which are injectable nanoparticles that emit blue light upon exposure to near infrared light (with strong tissue penetration ability). Therefore, LiCAR-T cells co-infused with UCNPs showed significant and controllable tumor killing in vivo, greatly improving the safety of CAR-T cell therapy [159]. Furthermore, certain other attempts based on light-regulated CAR-T have been made, all of which have shown promising safety [160,161,162].

4.7
Gene editing

Gene editing technology has been used to develop new CAR-T cells (Fig. 3Ei). Knockout or silencing of PDCD1 by CRISPR/Cas9 [163, 164] or short hairpin RNA (shRNA) [148] has been shown to increase anti-tumor effects. In one clinical trial, all 20 patients with NSCLC who received PD-1 knockout anti-MUC1 CAR-T cells experienced significant symptom improvement, and 11 of them achieved stable disease status [165]. However, some studies have shown that PD-1 silencing may not be conducive to the anti-tumor effect of CAR-T cells. Han et al. found that a blockade of PD-1 limited the proliferation and promoted the early differentiation of CAR-T cells [166], suggesting that further research is needed to investigate how this approach affects CAR-T function. Knockdown of CTLA-4 with shRNA also significantly increased proliferation and anti-tumor activity in first- but not second-generation CAR-T cells [167].

The T cells used for CAR-T cell therapy are often derived from the patient to avoid allogeneic immune rejection. Therefore, individualized CAR-T cells must be temporarily generated for each patient, which has limitations such as high cost, long waiting time, and inconsistent CAR-T cell quality. Another application of gene editing technology in CAR-T cell therapy is to create off-the-shelf products also known as universal CAR-T cells. The generation of universal CAR-T cells needs to solve two major problems: graft versus host disease (GvHD) and host versus graft rejection (HvGR). This can be achieved by using gene editing techniques (zinc finger nucleases [ZFNs], TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9) to knock out TCR and MHC-I or CD52 on allogeneic CAR-T cells [168,169,170,171]. TCR site destruction and CAR coding gene insertion by CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to result in potentially universal CAR-T cells that effectively reduced tonic signaling and delayed exhaustion [172, 173]. Anti-CD19 CAR-T cells modified with TCRα constant chain knockout by TALENs have been shown in clinical trials to be effective and safe for patients with relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia [174, 175]. The Cas9 variants developed by Ciaramella et al. achieved simultaneous knockout of MHC-I, MHC-II, and TCR in T cells and may find application in the development of universal CAR-T cells [176]. However, universal CAR-T cell therapy continues to face considerable technical obstacles in clinical application, including low editing efficiency and off-target editing. In contrast, replacing T cells with other MHC-independent immune cells (such as NK cells) may make universal cell therapy more feasible.

Research progress

Emily Whitehead, then a 6-year-old with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, was treated with Kymriah (anti-CD19 CAR-T cells) in 2012 and has been free of the disease for 11 years, making her the first patient with leukemia to be cured by CAR-T therapy. This success caused CAR-T cell therapy to receive considerable attention and undergo rapid development. CAR-T cell immunotherapy has achieved great success in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Eight CAR-T cell immunotherapies have been approved for marketing (Table 1), of which Kymriah, Yescarta, Tecartus, Breyanzi, Abecma, and Carvykti are FDA approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory (r/r) B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia, r/r large B cell lymphoma, r/r mantle cell lymphoma, r/r multiple myeloma, and r/r follicular lymphoma. Carteyva and CT103A are approved by the China National Medical Products Administration for the treatment of r/r large B cell lymphoma and r/r multiple myeloma, respectively (Table 1).

Furthermore, some CAR-T therapies that remain in clinical trials have also shown encouraging outcomes. For example, Arcellx Inc. announced the phase 1 clinical data of their B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted CAR-T therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma (NCT04155749) in April 2022. The ORR was as high as 100%, and the CR rate was 75% [177]. In phase 2 clinical results of KTE-X19, a CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy developed by Kite Pharma showed an 85% ORR and 59% CR rate in 74 patients with r/r mantle cell lymphoma (NCT02601313) [178]. Huang et al. specifically inserted CAR into the PDCD-1 locus by electroporation to produce non-viral anti-CD19 CAR-T cells that led to a complete response in seven out of eight patients (87.5%) without significant side effects (NCT04213469) [179]. These results have set high expectations for novel CAR-T therapies.

However, it is important to note that these CAR-T therapies with promising clinical outcomes are mainly employed to treat hematological tumors. CAR-T therapies for solid tumors are being developed rather slowly due to the limitations of target specificity and the immunosuppressive TME. Currently, mesothelin, glypican-3, GD2, HER2, B7-H3, and claudin18.2 are the main targets of CAR-T cells for the treatment of solid tumors (Fig. 2C, Additional file 1), including glioma and colorectal, cervical, pancreatic, and lung cancers. However, these CAR-T therapies are all in phase 1 or phase 2 clinical trials, and published data show that the response rate of CAR-T cell therapy for solid tumors is weaker than that for hematological tumors. In one study, for example, all 37 patients with gastrointestinal cancer experienced grade 3 or higher hematologic toxicity after receiving various doses of claudin18.2-targeted CAR-T cell therapy, and 94.6% of patients experienced grade 1 or 2 CRS with an ORR of 48.6% (NCT03874897) [180]. In a clinical trial of anti-EGFRvIII CAR-T cell therapy for recurrent glioblastoma, 0 out of 10 patients achieved partial or complete response (NCT02209376) [181], despite good efficacy against EGFRvIII positive tumor cells in vitro and in xenogeneic mouse models [182, 183]. Therefore, CAR-T cell treatments for solid tumors are still a long way from being used in clinical settings.

Furthermore, as CAR-T cell therapy develops, its potential in the treatment of other diseases is gradually becoming apparent. For example, CAR-T cell therapy targeting HIV surface proteins almost eliminated HIV in humanized mice [184], and anti-gp120 CAR-T therapy is being tested in patients with HIV (NCT04648046). CAR-modified Treg cells can exert specific immunosuppressive functions and avoid GvHD after organ transplantation [185]. QEL-001, an HLA-A2 targeted CAR-Treg cell therapy developed by Quell Therapeutics, has entered clinic trials (NCT05234190) for the prevention of GvHD after liver transplantation [186]. Additionally, the potential of CAR-Treg cell therapy for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus, has been highlighted and clinical trials have been initiated in recent years [187, 188].

Challenges and potential solutions

Current CAR-T therapy has many challenges that need to be overcome, particularly with regard to the treatment of solid tumors (Fig. 1), where it has not yet achieved breakthrough success.

1.
Target selection

A suitable target is the first consideration for CAR-T cell therapy. Although both CAR-T and TCR-T cells mediate tumor killing by loading T cells with a receptor that specifically recognizes tumor antigens, the structures of these two receptors are different. Consequently, CAR does not share some of the advantages of TCR, which restricts the range of selectable targets. First, fewer targets are available for CAR-T cells than for TCR-T cells because CAR is MHC-independent and can only detect surface antigens on the plasma membrane (only around 25% of human proteins are membrane-bound) [189]. Second, compared to TCR, CAR has substantially lower antigen sensitivity than TCR. TCR can be activated by 1–50 MHC molecules, whereas CAR requires at least 1000 antigens [13], meaning that low antigen density is insufficient for CAR-T therapy.

The ideal target is confined to tumor cells and plays a critical role in their growth. However, most CAR-T therapy targets are also expressed in normal tissues and thus contribute to the on-target/off-tumor toxicity of CAR-T cell therapy. The severity of this toxicity is related to the expression and importance of the selected target in normal tissues. CD19 is now the most developed target in CAR-T cell therapy (Fig. 2C, Additional file 1). As CD19 is a marker of human B cells, healthy B cells are also eliminated by anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, drastically lowering serum immunoglobulin levels. However, the human body can withstand the loss of B cells over a short time period, paving the way for the widespread application of CD19 in the field of CAR-T cell treatment for B cell lymphoma [190]. However, screening for highly specific targets for solid tumors is challenging due to the considerable heterogeneity. Although a growing number of target studies have been conducted recently, many of which have progressed to clinical trials (Fig. 2A, C), all of the CAR-T cell therapies under investigation exhibit varying degrees of target-related side effects. For example, multiple HER2-targeting CAR-T therapies are being investigated for efficacy and safety in HER2-positive tumors. However, in a trial of HER2-targeted CAR-T cell therapy for colon cancer with lung and liver metastases, a patient receiving CAR-T cells developed rapid respiratory failure, lung invasion, and multiple organ dysfunction, ultimately leading to death [191]. CAR-T cells may recognize HER2 expressed in non-malignant tissues, thereby triggering systemic CRS and the destruction of normal organs [191]. Furthermore, carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX)-targeted CAR-T cell therapy in renal cell carcinoma trials resulted in liver enzyme abnormalities due to CAR-T cell infiltration in the bile duct epithelium expressing CAIX. However, the use of anti-CAIX monoclonal antibodies can prevent these side effects, providing evidence for off-tumor toxicity of CAR-T cell therapy [192, 193]. Alternatively, CAR-T cells targeting carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) have also been linked to severe colitis when used to treat colon cancer [194].

Next-generation CAR-T cells with logic-gate control can partially overcome the constraints of antigen heterogeneity and specificity. For instance, the “OR” logic-gate CAR, which mainly includes tandem and dual CARs, can recognize two or even three antigens and thus more thoroughly removes heterogeneous tumor cells. In terms of improving specificity, the design of “AND” logic-gate CAR, such as the split and synNotch CARs, ensures that cytotoxicity only occurs when two antigens are recognized (Fig. 3). Another effective strategy for tackling the target issue is to combine oncolytic viruses (OVs) with CAR-T cell therapy. OVs carrying specific genes can selectively infect tumor cells and replicate or express selected genes within them. OVs can be used to stimulate tumor cells to express tumor antigens of interest, which can then be targeted by CAR-T cells to further eliminate tumor cells. In 2020, Priceman et al. reported that the use of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells in combination with OV19t (an OV that induces cancer cells to express a truncated non-signaling variant of CD19) resulted in a complete response in approximately 60% of mice as opposed to 22% of mice treated with OV19t alone [195]. Finally, employing library approaches for multiple targeting can also address the restrictions of targets. The adaptive immune system relies on a large and diverse repertoire of antibodies for antigen recognition. Recently, researchers created an engineered immune cell repertoire that recognizes over 10⁶ potential antigens to mimic this mechanism in immunotherapy. They discovered that this library could recognize non-self-antigens and exhibit antigen-dependent clonal expansion, resulting in an increased population of tumor-specific effector cells and long-lasting anti-tumor responses. Moreover, the synthetic library led to robust immunological memory and the recognition of mutated or evolved tumors owing to the maintenance of CAR diversity [196]. Similar to TIL therapy, this design has advantages in that it can target multiple antigens and thus overcome the issue of heterogeneity. Furthermore, because the antibodies used in library construction have been screened by the human immune system and have appropriate affinity, the artificial library will not be toxic to normal tissues. However, the clinical feasibility of this technology has not yet been established. Using the CAR library from one patient may not have the same effects on other individuals because antigen expression profiles and immunological conditions vary among them. Additionally, it is now unrealistic to customize the CAR library for each patient because the process requires considerable time and effort.

2.
Infiltration

CAR-T cells can be widely distributed throughout the blood and lymphatic systems and therefore are likely to encounter cancerous cells in hematological tumors. However, CAR-T cells face challenges with infiltrating solid tumors due to their inherent chemotactic defects and the external restrictions imposed by the dense ECM, which is composed of highly organized fibrous molecules, glycoproteins, and other macromolecules [197, 198]. Contrary to TILs that have received chemotactic training, CAR-T cells generated from peripheral T cells typically exhibit imperfect chemotactic capacity. Chemokine signals can therefore be employed to facilitate the infiltration of CAR-T cells. For instance, forced expression of CSF-1 receptor in CAR-T cells boosts their anti-tumor activity against CSF-1-rich solid tumors [144]. Furthermore, combining CAR-T cells with OVs is another method that may promote infiltration [199, 200]. In a preclinical study, GD2-targeting CAR-T cells were combined with an OV expressing the chemokine CCL5 and the cytokine IL-15. This combination enhanced the infiltration and persistence of CAR-T cells and significantly improved the survival of tumor-bearing mice [201]. Additionally, two recent studies have also demonstrated the feasibility of enhancing CAR-T cell infiltration by combining them with OVs. In a mouse glioblastoma model, the combination of B7-H3-targeted CAR-T cells with oncolytic adenoviruses expressing the chemokine CXCL11 increased the infiltration of CAR-T cells and reprogrammed the immunosuppressive TME [202]. Furthermore, in a mouse renal cell carcinoma model, oncolytic adenoviruses expressing CCL5 and IL-12 enhanced CAR-T cell infiltration and inhibited tumor growth when combined with CAIX-targeting CAR-T cells [203]. Physical barriers created by the ECM are another major hurdle impeding CAR-T penetration. CAR-T cells that secrete ECM-degrading enzymes can successfully dissolve physical barriers, enhancing CAR-T infiltration [117]. Furthermore, local injection can also be used to directly deliver CAR-T cells into the tumor, bypassing the barriers and minimizing on-target/off-tumor effects. This approach has been attempted in brain [204], breast [205], and liver [206] cancers. However, many solid tumors are metastatic or have numerous lesions, limiting the applicability of local injections.

3.
Exhaustion

Extensive in vitro expansion, repetitive stimulation by tumor cells, and the inhibitory TME all result in CAR-T cell exhaustion and a loss of anti-tumor function [117, 207]. Exhausted CAR-T cells exhibit upregulated inhibitory receptors (e.g., PD-1, Lag3, Tim3, and TIGIT); decreased secretion of IL-2, TNF-α, and IFN-γ; altered metabolism; and epigenetic modifications.

Many strategies are currently being used to overcome exhaustion in CAR-T cell therapy. In terms of immune checkpoint blockade-based strategies, antibodies targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 have been used in combination with CAR-T cells [148, 208,209,210]. For example, Brown et al. found that an in vitro PD-1 blockade significantly improved the function of anti-GD2 CAR-T cells after repeated antigen stimulation. They also demonstrated that anti-GD2 CAR-T cells, when combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies, exhibited greater persistence in metastatic melanoma patients [210]. Another clinical trial conducted by Adusumilli et al. yielded similarly encouraging results, with 8 out of 11 patients with mesothelioma responding to anti-mesothelin CAR-T cells and anti-PD-1 antibodies, including complete metabolic responses in two patients [211, 212]. In addition to PD-1, targeting PD-L1 can also prevent the exhaustion of CAR-T cells. Katz et al. found that PD-L1 expression in liver MDSCs inhibited the anti-tumor function of CAR-T cells, while the use of anti-PD-L1 antibody improved the efficacy of CAR-T cells [213]. OVs have also been used to prevent CAR-T cell exhaustion and were shown to enhance the anti-tumor effect of CAR-T cells when equipped with the anti-PD-L1 mini-antibody [214]. In addition to the addition of exogenous antibodies, strategies to generate CAR-T cells with endogenously expressed immune checkpoint blockade antibodies or decoy immune checkpoints are equally feasible [119, 120, 215]. Brentjens et al. developed CAR-T cells secreting anti human PD-1 scFvs that outperformed conventional CAR-T cells in terms of their in vivo anti-tumor effects [120]. To block the PD-L1/PD-L2-mediated inhibitory signals, Adusumilli et al. engineered CAR-T cells to express dominant-negative PD-1 with intracellular domain deletion. They demonstrated that the truncated PD-1 rescued the CAR-T cell function from PD-1 ligand-mediated inhibition both in vitro and in vivo [148]. Furthermore, they discovered that this cell-intrinsic blocking by a dominant-negative receptor can achieve similar effects to an extrinsic blockade via anti-PD-1 antibody administration [216]. Moreover, Moon et al. developed CAR-T cells with a “switch receptor” that fused the extracellular domain of PD-1 with the transmembrane/intracellular domain of CD28. Such switch receptors converted the inhibitory signal of PD-1 into an activation signal and thus improved the persistence and anti-tumor effects of CAR-T cells in mesothelioma and prostate cancer mouse models [151]. In addition to immune checkpoint blockades, direct knockdown or knockout of the immune checkpoints through shRNA or gene editing technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 or TALEN can also prevent CAR-T cell exhaustion [148, 163, 164, 217, 218]. Wei et al. used CRISPR/Cas9 to knockout PD-1 in mesothelin-targeting CAR-T cells. The PD-1 knockout CAR-T cells exhibited stronger cytokine production and cytotoxicity toward PD-1-positive tumor cells and performed better in terms of tumor control and relapse prevention in vivo than conventional CAR-T cells with or without anti-PD-1 antibody treatment [164]. Zhao et al. used the CRISPR/Cas9 system to simultaneously disrupt TCR, β-2 microglobulin, and PD-1 genes to construct a universal CAR-T cell that showed a stronger anti-tumor effect in vivo [218].

According to the marker and stemness, T cells can be divided into Tn, Tscm, Tcm, effector memory T cells, effector T cells, and terminally differentiated T cells [219]. The therapeutic effect and persistence of CAR-T cells are related to the differentiation state of the cells, as less differentiated T cells can self-renew [220]. Clinical studies have found that the proportion of Tn, Tscm, and Tcm in CAR-T cells is positively correlated with the overall response in various malignant tumors, including melanoma [221, 222], neuroblastoma [223], chronic lymphocytic leukemia [224], multiple myeloma [225, 226], pancreatic cancer [227], and B cell lymphoma [228,229,230,231]. These studies demonstrate the importance of a less differentiated status of CAR-T cells.

The function and differentiation of many immune cells, particularly T cells, are closely linked to metabolic state. Generally, less differentiated T cells, which have lower metabolic requirements, use the glucose-derived pyruvate or fatty acid oxidation (FAO) pathway to obtain ATP via oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) [232,233,234]. In contrast, effector T cells mainly utilize glycolysis to provide ATP and intermediates for proliferation and function, particularly after encountering antigens [234, 235]. It has been shown that T cell differentiation can be controlled by glycolysis and OxPhos or FAO pathways [236, 237]. The complex TME can affect T cell metabolism in various ways, including via the consumption of key nutrients (e.g., glucose [238] or tryptophan [239]), accumulation of ions (e.g., potassium [240, 241]) and biologically active metabolites (e.g., lactate [242, 243] or adenosine [244,245,246]), oxidative stress (e.g., reactive oxygen species (ROS) [247, 248]), and immune checkpoints. Attempts have been made to enhance stemness by reprogramming CAR-T cell metabolism. Studies have found that CD28 costimulatory domain-based CAR-T cells exhibit a higher level of glycolysis, while 4-1BB based CAR-T cells have higher basal oxygen consumption and OxPhos rates, reflecting the metabolic characteristics of memory-like T cells [45]. This is consistent with the better persistence of the 4-1BB-based CAR-T cells. IL-7, IL-15, or IL-21 can be used to replace IL-2 in the preparation of CAR-T cells in vitro, as IL-2 promotes glycolysis and late differentiation of T cells [249]. However, IL-15 can shift energy metabolism from glycolysis to OxPhos by inhibiting mTOR, maintaining stemness and inducing stronger anti-tumor activity and proliferation [250]. The combination of IL-15 and IL-7 has also been shown to induce the Tscm phenotype of CAR-T cells [251], and IL-21 can enhance FAO and promote Tcm formation [252]. Inhibition of mTOR or the upstream Akt can also promote T cell stemness by switching T cell metabolism to the FAO pathway [253,254,255]. Treating T cells with 2-deoxy-D-glucose to interfere with glycolysis during in vitro expansion is conducive to memory T cell formation [256]. Furthermore, studies have found that interference in the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway can shift T cell metabolism from glycolysis to FAO and OxPhos, thereby promoting cell survival and self-renewal [257]. The combination of anti-PD-1 antibody and the PGC1α agonist bezafibrate can increase OxPhos and reduce T cell apoptosis [258]. ROS accumulation in activated T cells is detrimental to T cell function. Anti-CD19 CAR-T cells supplemented with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine limit ROS metabolism, reduce glycolysis, promote FAO, and stimulate T cell differentiation into Tscm [259]. Competition for nutrients within the TME also affect T cell phenotypes. Studies have found that L-arginine promotes memory formation and enhances OxPhos in T cells, improving their anti-tumor function [260]. Cholesterol is also critical for T cell function because it affects TCR aggregation and the formation of immune synapses. In a mouse model of melanoma, inhibition of cholesterol esterification led to elevated plasma membrane cholesterol levels and enhanced the function of CD8⁺ T cells [261]. Furthermore, Xu et al. showed that T cells within tumors are cholesterol deficient, which leads to T cell exhaustion and dysfunction. The depletion of LXRβ, a molecule that downregulates cell cholesterol, improved the anti-solid tumor function of CAR-T cells [262]. Short chain fatty acids can also regulate the anti-tumor activity of CAR-T cells through metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming. CAR-T cells treated with pentanoate and butyrate reportedly exhibited increased mTOR activity and reduced class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity. This reprogramming enhanced the anti-tumor activity of ROR1-targeting CAR-T cells [263].

In addition to metabolic reprogramming, the persistence of CAR-T cells can also be improved by reprogramming gene expression. Research on CAR-T cells from complete response and non-response patients has found that the gene expression profile of exhausted T cells significantly differs from that of effector and memory T cells [224] and is regulated by epigenetic modifications and transcription factors [264]. In exhausted cells, the expression of epigenetic regulators such as DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) and HDAC are considerably changed. DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) has been shown to downregulate the factors responsible for memory cell maintenance and T cell exhaustion [265, 266]. Similarly, methylcytosine dioxygenase TET2 catalyzes DNA methylation to promote T cell exhaustion [264]. It has been shown that the transcriptional profile of TET2-depleted CAR-T cells exhibiting a central memory phenotype showed increased anti-tumor effects [267, 268]. PR domain zinc finger protein 1 (PRDM1) regulates gene expression by interacting with various epigenetic regulatory enzymes [269] and can promote T cell terminal differentiation by negatively regulating memory-related genes [270]. The depletion of PRDM1 in CAR-T cells reshaped chromatin openness in approximately 7000 genomic regions and affected the expression of over 2000 genes. PRDM1-deficient CAR-T cells show a stemness phenotype, and although their effector functions, such as granzyme B and perforin production, are somewhat diminished, their good persistence allows them to exhibit potent anti-tumor effects in vivo [271].

Many transcription factors, such as T-bet, Eomes, NFAT, Blimp-1, BATF, Foxo1, and Foxp1, are associated with T cell exhaustion [109, 272,273,274,275,276]. Complete knockout of Eomes impaired T cell development, whereas deletion of one allele alleviated CD8⁺ T cell exhaustion [277]. T-bet was shown to reduce the expression of inhibitory receptors such as PD-1. Low glucose and hypoxia in the TME downregulate T-bet expression and promote T cell exhaustion [278]. T-bet and Eomes compete for the same binding sites, including PDCD1. The subcellular localization of Eomes and T-bet is critical for their regulatory functions during exhaustion. Exhausted T cells have a higher nuclear Eomes/T-bet ratio than memory T cells [279, 280]. TCF-1 is a key transcription factor of progenitor exhausted CD8⁺ T cells that can regulate the balance of T-bet/Eomes transcription factors and drive the fate of CD8⁺ T cells by promoting Eomes expression [281]. Therefore, targeting TCF-1 may promote the persistence of CAR-T cells. IL-18-secreting CAR-T cells constructed by Abken et al. can upregulate T-bet and downregulate FoxO1, showing good effects on advanced solid tumors [109]. The transcription factor NFAT combines with activator protein 1 (AP1) to activate genes involved in T cell activation and upregulate the effector cytokines IL-2 and IL-4 [282]. However, in the absence of AP1, NFAT binds to other promoters and triggers the expression of exhaustion-related genes [283]. TOX and NR4A are downstream transcription factors regulated by NFAT and cooperate to promote CD8⁺ T cell exhaustion [284]. However, triple knockout of Nr4a (including Nr4a1, Nr4a2, and Nr4a3) in CAR-T cells promoted tumor regression and prolonged the survival of tumor-bearing mice [285]. June et al. showed that SOX4 and ID3 are the key transcription factors for CAR-T cell exhaustion, and the downregulation of their expression can improve the therapeutic effect on solid tumors by delaying CAR-T cell dysfunction [286]. McCutcheon et al. systematically profiled the effects of activation and repression of 120 transcription factors and epigenetic modifiers on human CD8⁺ T cell state through orthogonal CRISPR screening, and discovered that the basic leucine zipper ATF-like transcription factor 3 (BATF3) promotes memory T cell production by interacting with JUNB and interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) to regulate gene expression. BATF3-overexpressing T cells lost their exhaustion phenotype upon chronic antigen stimulation; moreover, BATF3-overexpressing CAR-T cells showed increased anti-tumor effects [287]. Similarly, Hogan et al. found that BATF and IRF4 could cooperate to combat T cell exhaustion, and BATF-overexpressing CAR-T cells showed increased survival and expansion [288]. However, it is also necessary to pay attention to the potential risks that may be caused by reprogramming gene expression. For example, BATF3 was previously suggested to drive the development of T cell leukemia by inducing myc transcription [289,290,291]. Recent studies have shown that BATF3 needs to be combined with the biallelic deletion of Tet2 for tumorigenicity, allowing TET2 to prevent uncontrolled proliferation of BATF3-induced CAR-T cells [292].

Other approaches, such as depleting MDSCs or arming CAR-T cells with pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-12 and IL-23), can also prevent exhaustion and improve CAR-T cell function [94, 116, 213]; however, the potential risk of CRS or other systemic toxicities should be considered. Recently, Brudno et al. developed MASTER, a biomaterial that can shorten the tedious and time-consuming process of in vitro CAR-T cell production to a single-day process, allowing the entire activation and CAR transduction process to be completed in patients [293]. The MASTER technique can potentially greatly reduce CAR-T cell preparation time and thus provide treatment opportunities for patients with rapid disease progression. More importantly, CAR-T cells produced using this technique can better maintain their memory phenotype and exhibit superior durability as they would not undergo extensive in vitro expansion. Although all of the aforementioned strategies are promising to address the exhaustion issue in CAR-T cell treatment for solid tumors, most are still in the preclinical stage and require further demonstration in clinical trials.

4.
Antigen escape

Heterogeneity of antigen density is a typical characteristic of tumors. CAR-T cells are generally ineffective against target cells with low antigen density. Therefore, after receiving CAR-T therapy, a small number of tumor cells with low antigen density often escape and lead to relapse (Fig. 5A). For example, BCMA is the main target of multiple myeloma; however, BCMA-negative relapse (antigen-loss or antigen-low escape) after anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy has been observed [294]. This issue can be addressed by employing tandem CAR to simultaneously target multiple targets and eliminate residual tumor cells. Another option is to boost the expression of target antigens, such as by using γ-secretase inhibitors to prevent BCMA degradation in myeloma cells [295].

5.
Safety

Apart from the on-target/off-tumor effect, CRS and NT are two defining clinical toxicities associated with CAR-T cell therapy that severely limit its safety [296]. Even the commercially available CAR-T therapies are frequently associated with CRS and NT. In real-world data from Yescarta disclosed by Kite Pharma, 96% of patients experienced and two patients (2%) died of CRS; 76% of patients suffered NT, which led to one fatality [297]. CRS refers to the excessive systemic inflammatory response caused by massive release of cytokines during CAR-T cell therapy, leading to organ damage or even death. Key cytokines related to CRS include IL-6, IFN-γ, TNF, and IL-1 [298, 299]. Elevated IL-6 levels are associated with increased CRS severity [298]. To treat life-threatening CRS during CAR-T cell therapy, the FDA authorized the use of the monoclonal antibody tocilizumab to block IL-6R [300]. Furthermore, other CRS-related cytokine receptor antagonists, such as anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, are also being investigated to ameliorate the fatal risk associated with CAR-T cell therapy [301]. The pathogenesis of NT is more complicated and less well understood than that of CRS. There are currently no FDA-approved drugs for the prevention or treatment of NT in CAR-T cell therapy. Clinically, corticosteroids can alleviate mild NT; however, continuous exposure for more than 10 days may reduce overall survival in patients with severe NT [302]. Elevated IL-6 levels do not play a critical role in NT, and tocilizumab had no effect on NT despite significantly reducing CRS [303, 304]. Studies have shown that NT severity may be associated with high disease burden before therapy, infusion dose, high expansion of CAR-T cells, high levels or elevated rates of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the blood, endothelial activation, blood–brain barrier injury, and severe CRS [303, 305]. Notably, Bot et al. found that early elevation of IL-15 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was correlated with severe NT, while other pro-inflammatory cytokines were not directly associated [302, 306]. Preclinical research has demonstrated that GM-CSF neutralizing antibodies can prevent CRS and NT in CAR-T cell therapy while also enhancing anti-tumor effects [307, 308]. However, clinical testing is necessary to determine whether GM-CSF antibodies can treat severe NT and ensure the security of CAR-T cell therapy. Other than developing drugs that inhibit CAR-T toxicity, optimizing the design of CAR to improve safety is also a potential approach. The next-generation CAR mentioned above has proposed various strategies that may help solve the issue of safety.

6.
GvHD and HvGR

Owing to the high costs and potential risks, CAR-T cell therapy is often used after patients have received unsatisfactory outcomes from radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and other treatments, rather than as first-line treatment. These pretreatments may lower the quantity and quality of T cells in patients, making CAR-T cell preparation impossible [309]. Although allogeneic (also known as universal) CAR-T cells can address the limitation of insufficient T cells, GvHD and HvGR, which are caused by MHC mismatch between the donor and recipient, must be carefully evaluated as they may result in a fatal risk or the elimination of CAR-T cells in vivo. Therefore, the development of allogeneic CAR-T cells requires further genetic modification, such as deletion of TCR and MHC-I, increasing the difficulty of CAR-T cell construction [168, 310]. Furthermore, using human-derived or humanized antibodies for CAR construction [311] or modifying the extracellular hinge and transmembrane domain [312, 313] can reduce the immunogenicity of CAR and help avoid HvGR. Many pharmaceutical companies are actively advancing research on universal CAR-T cells and have reported some promising outcomes. Results of the BCMA-targeting allogeneic CAR-T cell in patients with r/r multiple myeloma were recently reported (NCT04093596) [170]. The CAR-T cells (ALLO-715) used in this study have several advantages, including the use of human-derived scFvs to reduce the immunogenicity and deletion of TCR and CD52 via TALEN technology to avoid GvHD and HvGR. To further improve safety, the extracellular domain of ALLO-715 contains two mimotopes that are susceptible to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, functioning as an off-switch in the presence of rituximab [314, 315]. Among 43 patients with multiple myeloma receiving ALLO-715, only one patient developed grade ≥ 3 CRS, and no patient developed grade ≥ 3 NT. Furthermore, 70.8% of the patients treated with lymphodepletion combined with ALLO-715 showed a response, suggesting good safety and a promising therapeutic effect [170]. Moreover, clinical trials of allogeneic CAR-T cells for other targets and indications have also been conducted, showing good effects in avoiding GvHD and HvGR [171, 174, 316,317,318]. However, these trials are still in phases 1 and 2, and few of them are suitable for solid tumors; thus, more studies are needed to demonstrate feasibility.

In summary, despite the revolutionary advances made by CAR-T therapy in the treatment of hematologic tumors, many challenges remain to be overcome in the treatment of solid tumors. Many potential solutions have been proposed but have not been validated in clinical trials. Other immune cells that can be modified with CAR should also be taken into consideration in the future considering the unique milieu of solid tumors.

CAR-NK: powerful innate anti-tumor activity

The drawbacks of CAR-T cell therapy have resulted in an urgent need for new treatments that are convenient, safe, and effective. NK cells, a subset of innate lymphocytes that account for approximately 15% of the total lymphocytes in human peripheral blood, have received considerable attention as a potential alternative platform for CAR engineering therapy in recent years due to their distinctive biological properties. NK cells can identify self- and non-self-signals and killing abnormal cells directly without pre-sensitization. They can also produce a large number of cytokines and chemokines and exert immunomodulatory functions through interactions with DCs and macrophages. These properties make NK cells an ideal tool for cancer immunotherapy.

Similar to CAR-T cell therapy, CAR-NK cell therapy uses CAR molecules that target cancer cells to enable NK cells to more accurately recognize tumor cells. However, CAR-NK has several advantages and has the potential to close the therapy gap left by CAR-T cells in solid tumors (Fig. 1).

Advantages

1.
Potential for a universal product

NK cells are well suited for the generation of universal cell therapy products due to their homogeneity, low immunogenicity, minimal MHC matching, and lesser risk of GvHD. Therefore, CAR-NK cells can be generated using allogeneic NK cells. This therapy can potentially address the issues with long manufacturing processes and inconsistent quality that limit the application of current CAR-T cell therapies and can potentially reduce treatment costs. Moreover, allogeneic NK cells may be more suitable for cancer immunotherapy because they are not blocked by MHC expressed by tumor cells. Clinical investigations have demonstrated that allogeneic CAR-NK cell therapy is effective and safe [319, 320]. Currently, the sources of NK cells are divided into three categories: (1) Peripheral blood (PB) or umbilical cord blood (UCB). Similar to T cells for CAR-T therapy, NK cells can also be isolated from PB. However, PB is not the optimal cell source because it contains few NK cells. In contrast to PB, UCB contains a large amount of NK cells with greater proliferation potential than those from PB, making it a more feasible source for creating CAR-NK cells [321]. Clinical trials for CAR-NK cells generated from UCB are currently being conducted and showed good safety and efficacy [319, 322]. (2) Stem cells. NK cells can be generated by inducing differentiation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) [323, 324], and they have the same therapeutic potential as adult NK cells. (3) Cell lines. NK cell lines (such as NK92 and YT) can be used to construct CAR-NK cells. After in vitro irradiation, such CAR-NK cell lines lose tumorigenicity but retain the capacity to specifically target and destroy tumor cells [325], which can substantially lower treatment costs when used broadly.

2.
Safety

NK cells do not secrete IL-1 and IL-6, which may cause CRS, because their cytokine profiles differ from those of T cells, making CAR-NK therapy less likely to cause fatal side effects than CAR-T therapy. This safety benefit has been validated by the results of numerous clinical trials showing that CAR-NK cell therapies are not associated with CRS or NT [319, 320]. Furthermore, owing to their short lifespan and lack of proliferative ability, CAR-NK cells do not remain in the body for a long time. This may reduce the effectiveness of CAR-NK therapy, but from the perspective of safety, this feature avoids the potential hazards associated with the long-term existence of genetically modified immune cells in the body.

3.
Cytotoxicity

Compared with CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells exhibit a greater variety of strategies to attack tumor cells (Fig. 5B). First, NK cells not only directly lyse tumor cells by releasing perforin and granzymes but also recruit other immune cells to participate in anti-tumor activities by secreting cytokines and chemokines. Second, CAR-NK cells may be more effective than CAR-T cells in destroying PD-1-negative malignancies. The immune checkpoint PD-1 is consistently upregulated in activated T cells, which in turn limits their activity. However, a recent study demonstrated that PD-1 is not naturally expressed by NK cells; rather, they acquire it through trogocytosis from tumor cells, resulting in a functional inhibition. Consequently, NK cells can exert a stronger anti-tumor effect than T cells upon encountering PD-1-negative tumors because the inhibitory circuit mediated by trogocytosed PD-1 is absent [326]. Third, NK cells express Fc receptors (CD16) and are among the strongest cells in mediating ADCC functions, suggesting great potential in combination with antibody drugs to fight tumors. In 2020, Fate Therapeutics Inc. announced that its anti-CD19 CAR-NK cells showed stronger cytotoxicity against CD20⁺ lymphoma cells in patients with r/r B cell lymphoma (BCL) when combined with the CD20 antibody–drug rituximab. This suggests that the combination of antibody drugs and CAR-NK therapy may have a synergistic effect [320, 327, 328]. Finally, in addition to killing target cells in a CAR-dependent manner, CAR-NK cells also retain their inherent cytotoxicity, which is partly dependent on activating receptors such as NKG2D. As stressed cancer cells always express more of the activating ligands, CAR-NK cells may have a superior ability to kill tumor cells with low antigen density and high activating ligand expression and can thus better prevent treatment failure caused by antigen heterogeneity [329]. Clinical trials have demonstrated that among four patients with prior CAR-T therapy, two (50%) who received CD19 CAR-NK cell therapy achieved CR [328], indicating that CAR-NK cell therapy may be effective even when CAR-T cell therapy fails. However, it should be noted that this target-independent cytotoxicity may also introduce potential toxicity risks, which may be amplified when large infusions are required in clinical trials.

Research progress

Currently, CAR-NK therapy is in the early stages of research. Although the number of relevant clinical trials has increased rapidly in recent years, almost no clinical data have been published. CAR-NK clinical research mainly focuses on hematological tumors while also attempting to treat solid tumors. The majority of these clinical studies are only in phase 1, with a few in phase 2 (Fig. 2A). Hematoma-associated antigens (such as CD19, CD33, BCMA, and CD22) and solid tumor-related antigens (such as NKG2D ligand, PD-L1, ROBO1, and 5T4) are commonly employed in such clinical trials (Fig. 2C).

Published data indicate that CAR-NK cell therapy has clinical application potential. According to the data of a phase 1/2 clinical trial published by Rezvani et al. in 2020 [319], 8 (73%) out of 11 patients with CD19-positive lymphoid tumors responded to allogeneic UCB-derived CD19 CAR-NK cell therapy, and seven of them achieved complete remission. Notably, none of the patients receiving this treatment suffered CRS, NT, or GvHD. The allogeneic iPSC-derived CAR-NK cell therapy FT596 developed by Fate Therapeutics Inc. similarly demonstrated potent tumor eradication in patients with r/r BCL without side effects of any grade [320]. Furthermore, results from a recently published phase 1 clinical study regarding local application of HER2-specific CAR-NK92 cells for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, the primary objective of which was to evaluate the safety and tolerability 24 weeks post-injection, revealed that a dose of 1 × 10⁸ irradiated CAR-NK92 cells did not cause any side effects [330]. These results show the effectiveness and safety of CAR-NK cell therapy, as well as the feasibility of generating CAR-NK cells from allogeneic NK cells. However, the clinical efficacy of CAR-NK cell therapy needs to be further evaluated.

Challenges and potential solutions

Although CAR-NK cell therapy holds considerable potential, there are several important challenges that need to be addressed before it can be widely used in clinical settings (Fig. 1).

1.
Poor in vivo persistence

CAR-NK cells cannot persist in the body for a long period of time due to their short lifespan (approximately 2 weeks) and poor capacity for expansion in the recipient [331]. This is a major obstacle that CAR-NK cell therapy must overcome, as poor persistence is always associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Although CAR-NK cells made from cell lines can proliferate indefinitely, they must be irradiated prior to infusion due to their tumorigenicity, which makes CAR-NK incapable of proliferation and gives them poor persistence in vivo. In a clinical trial of CD33-targeting CAR-NK cell therapy employing NK92 cell lines, patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received up to 5 × 10⁹ CAR-NK92 cells without experiencing any substantial adverse effects or grade 3–4 toxicity in 2018. However, these CAR-NK92 cells did not offer a long-lasting remission, as they became undetectable a week after infusion [332].

Strategies to boost NK cell activation, such as knocking out or blocking inhibitory receptors on NK cells or increasing the expression of activated ligands on target cells, can compensate for poor persistence. Brien et al. demonstrated that combining a HDAC inhibitor and a PD-1/PD-L1 blocker improved the anti-tumor effect of anti-GD2 CAR-NK in a mouse neuroblastoma model [333]. TGF-β markedly inhibits the NK cell function. By introducing a chimera comprising the extracellular and transmembrane domains of the type II TGF-β receptor (TGFBR2) fused to the NKG2D intracellular domain, NK92 cells can be induced to more effectively infiltrate and attack HCC xenografts [334]. Moreover, many cytokines (such as IL-2, IL-15, and IFN-γ) can be used to promote NK cell proliferation. Bayle et al. introduced iMC into CAR-NK cells to promote NK cell function and further enhance CAR-NK cell proliferation by coupling them with ectopic IL-15 [335]. Similarly, CAR-NK cells expressing IL-15 have demonstrated long-term persistence and potent anti-tumor activity in clinical trials [319, 336]. Therefore, combining cytokines with CAR-NK cells may improve their persistence; however, attention should be paid to potential side effects and exhaustion caused by long-term exposure to cytokines [337].

2.
Insufficient infiltration

Similar to CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells face difficulty infiltrating solid tumors, and many attempts have been made to improve the infiltration of CAR-NK cells. Temme et al. discovered that anti-EGFRvIII CAR-NK cells overexpressing CXCR4 showed increased chemotaxis to U87-MG cells producing CXCL12 (a ligand for CXCR4) [338]. Similarly, anti-NKG2D CAR-NK cells overexpressing CXCR1 also showed stronger chemotaxis and infiltration to hypopharyngeal and ovarian cancer cells in a mouse model [339]. Moreover, the addition of OVs may enhance CAR-NK cell infiltration, although more research is needed [340]. Furthermore, local injection strategies are also used to circumvent the major barriers limiting infiltration and may improve the efficacy of CAR-NK cell therapy. In an in situ glioblastoma xenograft mouse model, Yu et al. intracranially injected EGFR-targeting CAR-NK92 cells into mouse brains and found that they effectively inhibited tumor development and significantly improved the survival rate of tumor-bearing mice [341]. Similarly, the local injection of HER2-targeting CAR-NK92 cells into glioblastoma mouse models resulted in complete tumor regression in the majority of mice [342].

3.
Limited supply of NK cells

In contrast to T cells, the number of NK cells in PB is very low and their proliferation ability is poor; therefore, other sources of NK cells must be used to meet the demand for CAR-NK cells preparation. NK cells from allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) can be considered because they are MHC-independent, which expands the pool of NK cell sources [343]. However, to prevent GvHD, NK cells must be completely separated from T cells.

NK cells are abundant in UCB and have a higher proliferative capacity than those in PB [343, 344]. UCB-derived CAR-NK cell therapy has entered clinical trials and demonstrated promising results. In a phase 1/2 clinical trial, 7 out of 11 patients with CD19-positive tumors who received UCB-derived anti-CD19 CAR-NK achieved complete remission, and the infused CAR-NK cells were retained for at least 12 months in vivo without CRS, NT, or GvHD (NCT03056339) [319]. However, primary NK cells derived from both UCB and PBMC exhibit heterogeneity between different donors, making it challenging to achieve uniform CAR-NK cell quality. In contrast, hESCs and iPSCs can be used to generate large numbers of NK cells with uniform quality [343]; however, the procedure is time-consuming and potential risks exist due to the tumorigenicity of iPSCs.

NK cell lines are an attractive source of NK cells due to their capacity for indefinitely proliferation and low culturing costs, which enable the generation of numerous homogeneous CAR-NK products [332]. However, owing to safety issues associated with their malignant origin, CAR-NK cells produced from cell lines must be irradiated before being administered to patients, which can have a severe impact on their long-term in vivo persistence and overall therapeutic potential. This issue has not yet been addressed. Another drawback is that CD56^bright NK cell lines (such as NK92) lack the potential to mediate cell death via ADCC as they lack CD16 [345].

4.
Lack of CAR optimization for NK cells

The current CAR structure in CAR-NK cell therapy almost completely misappropriates the design of CAR-T cells, which may not be the best choice. For example, the most commonly used costimulatory domains in CAR-T cells are CD28 and 4-1BB, of which CD28 is the activating receptor of NK cells [346], but the role of 4-1BB in NK cells is controversial. Some studies have suggested that 4-1BB can stimulate NK cell proliferation and cytokine secretion [347], while others have shown that it acts as an inhibitory receptor in human NK cells [348, 349]. In CAR-T cell therapy, although third-generation CAR did not outperform second-generation CAR, Guo et al. reported that the third-generation CAR-NK92 cells exhibited stronger cytotoxicity and proliferation than the first- and second-generation CAR-NK92 cells against αFR⁺ ovarian cancer cells [350]. Furthermore, studies have also shown that replacing CD3ζ with the NK activating receptor signaling adaptor molecule DAP12 can endow CAR-NK cells with a stronger anti-tumor activity [351]. Therefore, CAR should be tailored according to the characteristics of NK cells rather than simply by copying CAR-T cells. Only with this approach can CAR-NK therapy exert the greatest anti-tumor effect.

5.
Challenging gene transduction

Achieving gene transduction is substantially more challenging for NK cells than it is for T cells. The typical lentiviral vector used in CAR-T cell therapy has a transfection efficiency for NK cells that frequently falls below 20% [352]. One study showed that the treatment of NK cells with rosuvastatin to upregulate low-density lipoprotein receptor enhanced the transduction efficiency of vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G) pseudotyped lentivirus-based vectors without affecting cytotoxicity [353], but this approach has not been attempted with a CAR-NK cell preparation. Although the retrovirus vector has a higher transduction efficiency than the lentivirus, there is a risk of insertion mutation [354]. mRNA electroporation can achieve high transduction efficiency. Xu et al. constructed anti-NKG2D CAR-NK cells on PBMC-derived NK cells via mRNA electroporation and demonstrated their anti-tumor effects in vitro, in tumor-bearing mice, and in patients with colorectal cancer [355]. However, because mRNA electroporation can only mediate the non-integrated, transient expression, CAR-NK cells generated by this method must be infused multiple times, which increases the workload and the demand for NK cells. Other gene transduction methods that have been used successfully in CAR-T cell therapy, such as transposon system and adeno-associated viral (AAV) transduction, still lack empirical support in CAR-NK cell production. Therefore, the optimization of gene transduction for NK cells determines whether high CAR-positive CAR-NK cells can be obtained and requires more attention and investigation.

6.
Sensitivity to freezing and thawing

Primary NK cells are susceptible to the freeze–thaw process, and their survival rate and cytotoxicity after resuscitation are greatly reduced [356]. Consequently, many NK cells can be lost, exacerbating the problem of insufficient NK cells. The addition of IL-2 can partially restore the vitality of NK cells, but improvement of freezing tolerance is still necessary.

Overall, CAR-NK cell therapy, which is considered to be the second-most anticipated ACT after CAR-T cell therapy, has advanced significantly due to recently reported clinical and preclinical data. However, it is still limited to preclinical studies, and clinical studies are not extensive. More clinical evidence is urgently necessary to establish both its ultimate efficacy and any potential adverse effects in the human body.

CAR-macrophage: future nemesis of solid tumors

The application of CAR to macrophages, which began after T and NK cell applications, has gradually attracted attention in recent years [357]. Macrophages, which play critical roles in phagocytosis, cytokine secretion, and antigen presentation, are an important component of the innate immune system and serve as the key hub connecting innate and adaptive immunity [358]. Macrophages can be divided into the functionally opposing M1 and M2 subgroups. M1 macrophages are pro-inflammatory and have anti-tumor properties [359, 360], whereas M2 macrophages suppress immune responses and promote angiogenesis. Macrophages are highly plastic and can thus exhibit the M1 or M2 phenotype in response to any pathological conditions [361, 362]. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), characterized by an M2-polarized phenotype, are critical for tumor growth and metastasis and have been recognized as attractive therapeutic targets for cancer [363, 364]. TAMs constitute approximately 50% of tumor mass, indicating that macrophages have the highest infiltration rate among all immune cells and can easily enter the interior of solid tumors where T cells and NK cells cannot infiltrate [365]. Furthermore, the reinfusion of modified human bone marrow-derived macrophages has been shown to induce A549 xenograft regression with good in vivo safety [366], suggesting that ACT based on macrophages also has a broad range of applications, particularly for the treatment of solid tumors. Considering this, researchers are attempting to engineer macrophages with CAR to fight tumors.

Similar to CAR-T and CAR-NK, CAR-M therapy refers to the modification of macrophages with specific CARs to improve the phagocytic activity and antigen presentation of macrophages toward tumors [367]. The CAR structure is composed of an extracellular recognition domain, a transmembrane region, and an intracellular signaling domain (Fig. 6A). Intracellular signaling domains commonly used in CAR-M research include CD3, CD147, Megf10, and FcR [368,369,370,371]. In 2018, Vale et al. developed the first CAR-M cells, which were originally known as CAR-phagocytes (CAR-Ps), by using a lentiviral vector to introduce a novel CAR with Megf10 or FcRγ as the intracellular domain into the mouse macrophage cell line J774A.1. Moreover, they discovered that these CAR-Ps exhibited specific engulfment of whole human cancer cells, particularly when a tandem PI3K p85 subunit was also included in the CAR [368]. This study, despite focusing only on how CAR affects phagocytosis and omitting other crucial anti-tumor effects handled by macrophages, opens a new chapter in the study of CAR-based immunotherapy by suggesting, for the first time, that CAR expression in phagocytic cells is sufficient to stimulate the targeted engulfment and elimination of cancer cells.

Advantages

1.
TME improvement

Relying on a single type of immune cell to achieve a long-lasting and effective anti-tumor response is unfeasible; instead, a variety of immune cells operating in concert can have a better effect. Macrophages have a strong potential to modify the TME because they can interact with nearly all local immune cells (such as T cells, NK cells, and DCs) (Fig. 6C). In addition to enhancing the phagocytosis of target cells, the antigen-presenting ability of CAR-M cells enables them to transmit information regarding target cells to other immune cells, thereby mobilizing various immune cells to participate in tumor-killing activities. Furthermore, CAR-M cells can induce M2 macrophages to polarize toward M1, greatly reduce the proportion of TAMs in the TME, and secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines to modify the immunosuppressive TME, all of which have a positive effect on cancer therapy [369]. In 2020, Gill et al. used an incompletely replicated chimeric adenovirus vector (Ad5F35) to introduce a HER2-targeting CAR into macrophages. They subsequently discovered that HER2-targeting CAR-M cells not only exhibited a specific killing ability in vitro and in vivo, but also induced a pro-inflammatory TME and boosted anti-tumor T cell activity by producing pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, converting bystander M2 macrophages into M1, and upregulating antigen-presenting machinery [369]. This study demonstrates the potential of CAR-M cells to improve the TME.

2.
Extremely strong infiltration

T and NK cells only exhibit limited tumor infiltration due to the dense ECM surrounding tumor cells, whereas macrophages are naturally recruited to the TME and thus are the most prevalent immune cells in tumor tissues [365] (Fig. 6B). This is because macrophages can secrete matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), key enzymes that degrade the ECM. Shen et al. constructed CAR-M cells using CD147 as the intracellular signaling domain (CAR-147 M) and discovered that when co-cultured with target cells, these CAR-147 M cells exhibited significantly increased MMP expression. Despite not having an impact on tumor cell proliferation in vitro, CAR-147 M cells rapidly accumulated in the tumor site after being infused in vivo, reduced tumor collagen deposition, and encouraged T cell infiltration, which resulted in significant tumor suppression. This implies that CAR-M cells secrete proteases that not only enable them to infiltrate effectively but also encourage the infiltration of other immune cells [370].

3
Safety

CAR-M cells may be safer than other CAR-based cell therapies. Similar to CAR-NK cells, CAR-M cells have a limited circulation period in the body, which can avoid the potential harm that genetically engineered cells may bring. Furthermore, there is no GvHD risk or requirement for MHC matching when using allogeneic macrophages. Moreover, CAR-M cells may not cause serious or fatal CRS. Shen et al. reported that levels of CRS-related pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α) were significantly reduced in the PB of CAR-147 M-treated mice [370].

4.
High universality for therapy

As allogeneic administration of macrophages does not result in GvHD, allogeneic macrophages can be used to create universal CAR-M cells. The use of CAR-expressing macrophages produced from iPSCs (CAR-iMs) in tumor treatment was first reported by Zhang et al. in 2020, who discovered that CAR-iMs are more polarized toward the M2 phenotype in the absence of antigens. However, following antigen stimulation, CAR-iMs exhibited enhanced phagocytosis and M1 phenotype preference. In various mouse hematological and solid tumor models, CAR-iMs demonstrated effective anticancer activity without exhibiting notable side effects [371]. This study demonstrated the potential of CAR-M therapy as a universal treatment and raised the possibility that iPSCs could be used as a cell source for CAR-M therapy in the future.

5.
Multiple killing modes

In addition to antigen-specific phagocytosis, CAR-M cells have the capacity for antigen-independent phagocytosis. Furthermore, the antigen-presenting ability of CAR-M cells can facilitate the killing of tumor cells mediated by other immune cells, facilitating more comprehensive killing of highly heterogeneous tumor cells [372] (Fig. 6C). Gill et al. reported that chimeric adenovirus vectors can not only successfully introduce CAR into macrophages but also confer the M1 phenotype of CAR-M cells and prevent M2 induction [369], potentially enhancing the non-specific killing ability of CAR-M cells. Notably, they found that CAR-M cells can present antigenic epitopes to T cells, enabling tumor-specific T cells to activate and proliferate. These diverse tumor-killing modes aid in the complete eradication of tumor cells as well as the prevention of relapse.

Research progress

Currently, only two CAR-M related studies are registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (Table 2). The first is CT-0508 (HER2-targeting CAR-M cells derived from chimeric adenoviral vector Ad5f35-transduced iPSCs, NCT04660929) from Carisma Therapeutics, which is scheduled to complete clinical trials in 2023. CT-0508 is the first CAR-M therapy approved for clinical trials, marking the beginning of a new era of cancer therapy. Furthermore, the FDA granted CT-0508 Fast Track designation in September 2021, demonstrating the urgent need for CAR-M therapy development. The other study is an in vitro trial in which the anti-tumor activity of CAR-M cells is being examined in tumor samples collected from patients (NCT05007379). As shown by the scarcity of studies, CAR-M therapy is still in its infancy. More clinical data are urgently needed to confirm the feasibility of CAR-M therapy, and the results of the CT-0508 clinical trial are greatly anticipated.

Table 2 Summary of CAR-M, CAR-γδT, and CAR-NKT in clinical trials of cancer therapy

Full size table

Challenges and potential solutions

Clinical trials of CAR-M therapy are in their early stages, and numerous potential issues remain to be handled and verified.

1.
Potential “mutiny”

Although CAR-M cells have demonstrated promise in preclinical investigations, their performance in the complex interior milieu of the human body could be complicated by their highly flexible nature. Limited clinical data are available to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of CAR-M therapy in vivo. One potential risk is that CAR-M cells could lose their anti-tumor properties and potentially transform into TAMs that accelerate tumor growth, particularly in the suppressive TME. Multiple remedies have been proposed to address this issue, including targeting the crucial pathways that induce and/or regulate macrophage polarization, such as a CSF1R blockade [373, 374] or co-expression of IFN-γ [375], which may be beneficial for preserving the phenotypic and anticancer efficacy of CAR-M cells.

2.
Limited availability

CAR-M therapy requires a large number of cells and frequent infusions. Consequently, macrophage availability presents a challenge because human primary macrophages make up a relatively small proportion of PB and cannot proliferate either in vitro or in vivo. However, allogeneic macrophages can be employed because they are less likely to result in GvHD. iPSCs are a good alternative and have been tested in a clinical trial [371], though concern exists over their potential tumorigenicity.

3.
Challenges in gene transduction

Macrophages act as first responders to defend against viral infection; therefore, they are resistant to the typical viral vectors commonly used in gene and cell therapies, which makes creating CAR-M cells more difficult. Moreover, because macrophages are highly plastic innate immune cells, the gene transduction method used to construct CAR-M cells must be carefully selected to avoid affecting their phenotype. Currently, the chimeric adenovirus vector Ad5F35 constructed by Gill et al. has demonstrated good potential for gene transduction in macrophages. It not only efficiently introduces foreign genes but also encourages CAR-M cells to polarize toward the M1 phenotype [369]. Notably, nanobiotechnology offers a method to construct CAR-M cells in vivo. Kang et al. successfully delivered the genes encoding CAR and IFN-γ to macrophages in tumor tissues via intratumoral injection of macrophage-targeting polymer nanocarriers and discovered that CAR-M cells produced using this method had anti-tumor abilities as well as the capacity to alter the TME and boost overall anti-tumor immune response [376]. This method, if it can meet the requirements for clinical application, will assist in avoiding the difficult and expensive ex vivo CAR-M cell manufacturing processes. Moreover, CAR-M cells produced in vivo using this method bypass infiltration, potentially leading to a better anti-tumor effect.

4.
Potential toxicity of in vivo CAR-M cell dispersion

The migration characteristics of the imported macrophages in vivo will seriously affect their therapeutic effect. According to reports, the infused CAR-M cells travel through the lungs and then stay mainly in the liver, where they are even more enriched than in tumors [377]. This diffusion property of CAR-M cells not only negatively impacts treatment outcomes but also raises the possibility of liver injury. However, these limitations of CAR-M therapy may be circumvented via co-expression of a particular chemokine receptor to drive CAR-M cell migration toward the tumor or by local injection of CAR-M cells to avoid the in vivo circulation process.

5.
Inadequate CAR optimization for macrophages

Macrophages differ significantly from NK and T cells in function and activation pattern, necessitating optimization of the CAR structure to better match macrophages. Although CD3ζ is frequently used and has been shown to boost specific phagocytosis, pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and antigen presentation of CAR-M cells, the efficacy and persistence of CD3ζ-based CAR-M cells still require improvement. Through research using RAW264.7 cells, Zhu et al. discovered that employing Mer receptor tyrosine kinase (MerTK) as the intracellular domain confers macrophages with potent phagocytic abilities toward tumor cells, whereas using TLR2, TLR4, TLR6, and CD3ζ had relatively little effect [378]. However, Vale et al. reported that CAR using Megf10 or FcRγ, but not Bai1 or MerTK, as intracellular domains endowed J774A.1 macrophages with phagocytic capabilities similar to those achieved using CD3ζ. Furthermore, the addition of a random PI3K-recruiting motif significantly enhanced the antigen-specific phagocytosis activity of such CAR-M cells. Although some of these data are debatable and based on murine cells, they do indicate that it may be possible to alter the CAR structure to increase CAR-M cell efficacy. Future research should focus on screening the proper intracellular domains and optimizing CAR structure to more precisely assemble human primary macrophages [368].

Overall, CAR-M cells have shown effective anti-tumor effects in preclinical studies and are superior to CAR-T and CAR-NK cells in some aspects, particularly in their capacity to infiltrate tumors. Although further clinical research into effectiveness and safety is still necessary, the development of CAR-M therapy has nonetheless created new opportunities for the treatment of solid tumors.

CAR-γδT: a promising candidate for allogeneic cell therapy

Although αβT cells are the T cell subset primarily used in CAR-T cell therapy, γδT cells share various unique features that could confer new capabilities to CAR-T cells. γδT cells, a critical component of the innate immune system, account for approximately 1–5% of PB T cells and are mainly divided into three subtypes: Vδ1, Vδ2, and Vδ3. With both innate and adaptive characteristics in immune response, γδT cells can rapidly recognize and respond to non-MHC-restricted tumor antigens. A significant association between tumor-infiltrating γδT cells and favorable prognosis was discovered by Gentles et al. when they analyzed the gene expression signature of approximately 18,000 samples from 39 types of malignant tumors [379]. Therefore, anti-tumor treatments based on unmodified γδT cells have long received attention in clinical research. For example, in a clinical trial examining adoptive transfer of allogeneic γδT cells reported by Yin et al. in 2021, the infusion of γδT cells significantly prolonged the survival of patients with liver and lung cancers [380]. However, compared to the success of CAR-T in hematological tumors, the effectiveness of γδT adoptive therapy remains unsatisfactory. Therefore, several novel approaches have been developed to address the shortcomings of γδT cell therapy, the most promising of which involves engineering γδT cells with CAR. The first CAR-γδT cell therapy was created in 2004 by Rossig et al., who produced CAR-γδT cells by stimulating PBMC-derived γδT cells with aminobisphosphonates in vitro and delivering first-generation GD2- or CD19-specific CARs into γδT cells using retrovirus vectors. When co-cultured with the corresponding target cells, these CAR-γδT cells showed specific cytolysis along with elevated levels of IFN-γ and the T cell activation marker CD69 [381]. This study demonstrated the anti-tumor potential of CAR-γδT cells for the first time.

Advantages

1.
Multiple killing modes

In addition to CAR-mediated cytotoxicity, γδT cells can also recognize tumor cells through intrinsic receptors (Vδ1TCR, CD16, NKG2D, and NKp30) and activate various natural tumor-killing pathways, such as perforin/granzyme-dependent cytotoxicity, CD16-mediated ADCC, and TRAIL/FASL-triggered apoptosis [382] (Fig. 7A). Additionally, γδT cells can also serve as APCs that present tumor antigens to αβT cells. Anderson et al. found that anti-GD2 CAR-γδT cells produced from PB not only specifically destroyed the GD2⁺ LAN1 cells but also retained the ability to endocytose and present tumor antigens to αβT cells, leading to the clonal expansion of αβT cells [383].

2.
Universal applicability

As MHC non-restricted lymphocytes, γδT cells differ from αβT cells in that they do not cause GvHD, making them ideal for the development of universal CAR-γδT therapy [384]. In a clinical experiment using allogeneic γδT cells to treat liver and lung cancer, Yin et al. discovered that γδT cells have good safety in vivo [380].

3.
Effective infiltration and resistance to hypoxia

γδT cells, particularly the Vδ1 subtype, have a homing advantage over αβT cells and are thus better able to infiltrate tumors, especially those with a hypoxic TME [385, 386]. Additionally, γδT cells may function more effectively in the hypoxic TME because their cytotoxicity, as well as their secretion of MIP1, RANTES, and CD40L, can be enhanced by hypoxia. However, tumor cells also employ strategies such as secreting soluble MHC-I-related molecules to avoid γδT cell-mediated killing [387], which must be overcome by developing more potent γδT immunotherapies [388]. Anderson et al. reported that engineering γδT cells with CAR can increase their cytotoxicity while retaining their ability to migrate toward tumor cells and cross-present antigens [383]. These studies implying that incorporating CAR into γδT cells is feasible and may be effective in treating hypoxic solid tumors.

4.
TME amelioration

Activated γδT cells can secrete various pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to create an inflammatory environment (Fig. 7A). Additionally, γδT cells serve as a bridge between innate immunity and adaptive immunity, promoting the maturation of DCs, activating NK cells, promoting antibody production in B cells, and improving the humoral immune response. Moreover, γδT cells can serve as APCs and mobilize bystander immune cells to attack tumor cells [386] (Fig. 7A). For example, Anderson et al. found that anti-GD2 CAR-γδT cells functioned as APCs, processing and presenting the antigen to αβT cells while simultaneously inducing their clonal expansion [383].

Research progress

Although the preclinical results of CAR-γδT are impressive, there are few clinical trials, and most are focused on hematological tumors (Fig. 2A, Table 2). The most advanced current option is ADI-001, an allogeneic CD20-targeting CAR-γδT cell therapy that was developed to treat B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [389]. ADI-001 is currently being investigated in a phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate its safety and efficacy in monotherapy or in combination with IL-2 [390]. In June 2022, Adicet Bio released partial clinical data for ADI-001 (NCT04735471), demonstrating a 78% ORR and CR rate in nine patients who had received multiple prior treatments, with no patient experiencing grade ≥ 3 CRS, ICANS, or GvHD. Notably, the ORR and CR rate for the four patients who had received prior anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy was both 100% [391]. Considering its promising efficacy and safety, the FDA has granted Fast Track designation to ADI-001. Furthermore, clinical trials of CAR-γδT cells targeting CD123 (NCT05388305), CD19 (NCT04796441, NCT02656147, NCT05554939), CD7 (NCT04702841), and NKG2D ligands (NCT04107142, NCT05302037) are also in progress; however, clinical data have not yet been published.

Challenges and potential solutions

1.
Limited γδT cell quantity

In clinical trials of CAR-T therapy, the usual dose is 1–5 × 10⁶ CAR-positive αβT cells/kg, with approximately 10⁸ cells per infusion per adult [392]. However, it is difficult to achieve this dose of CAR-γδT cells due to the scarcity of γδT cells in PB and the challenge of in vitro expansion. Conventional methods for expanding αβT cells, such as anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies and IL-2, usually do not result in the effective expansion of γδT cells, which is a problem that must be solved for the clinical application of CAR-γδT cell therapy. Therefore, many preclinical studies have focused on addressing the problem of γδT cell expansion.

Aminobisphosphonates are frequently used to induce γδT cell expansion; however, they only expand the Vγ9Vδ2 cell subset and are ineffective for Vδ1 T cells, resulting in cell waste and an inability to utilize the unique capabilities of Vδ1 T cells. Waller found that treating PBMCs with an anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody could produce an IL-12-dependent signal that not only protected γδT cells from mitogen-induced apoptosis but also promoted cell proliferation with no negative effect on the function of amplified γδT cells [393]. Foster et al. stimulated PBMCs with ConA and observed a 2846-fold expansion of γδT cells after 19 days [394]. Cooper et al. developed a method to expand polyclonal CAR-γδT cells by electroporating PBMCs with the sleeping beauty (SB) transposon system and then sorted the cells to obtain CAR-γδT cells containing a broad combination of Vγ and Vδ chains. When co-cultured with γ-irradiated, CD19⁺ K562-derived artificial antigen-presenting cells in the presence of soluble IL-2 and IL-21, these sorted anti-CD19 CAR-γδT cells expanded considerably, yielding a substantial number of polyclonal CAR-γδT cells with a memory phenotype and remarkable specific anti-tumor activity [395]. These approaches may address the problem of insufficient cell supply for clinical CAR-γδT therapy, but their feasibility has yet to be tested in the clinic.

2.
Inadequate CAR optimization for γδT cells

As γδT cells differ significantly from αβT cells, it is important to construct appropriate CAR molecules that consider the characteristics of γδT cells for improved performance. Although γδT cell therapy has demonstrated good safety in recent studies, the likelihood of CAR-related on-target/off-tumor toxicity cannot be neglected. The ability of γδT cells to recognize antigens in a non-MHC-restricted manner gives them an advantage in tackling this challenge. Considering the preexisting capacity of γδTCR in tumor antigen recognition and signal transduction, Anderson et al. constructed a CAR composed of an anti-GD2 scFv linked with a DAP10 endodomain that enabled costimulation to supplement the endogenous γδTCR signal [396]. After being expressed in Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, this costimulation-only CAR recognized GD2 and then transmitted DAP10 signals in concert with Vγ9Vδ2 TCR signaling to fully activate the CAR-γδT cells. Moreover, by building an effective “AND” logic gate with the inherent γδTCR, this novel CAR offers γδT cells a more precise tumor-killing activity, thus minimizing on-target/off-tumor toxicity [396]. The DAP10 signal typically provided by NKG2D is essential for γδT cell activation, yet most tumor cells may block this signal by decreasing and/or shedding NKG2D ligands, resulting in tumor immune evasion [397]. Therefore, this new CAR may also prevent tumor cells from evading γδT cell attack when appropriate antigen recognition components are used. As mentioned earlier, exhaustion is a serious challenge that negatively impacts the efficacy of all T cell therapies. However, it can be alleviated by modifying the CAR structure in CAR-γδT cell therapy. Anderson and Pe'er found that typical CD3ζ-carrying CARs triggered tonic signaling network activation in both αβT and γδT cells, which resulted in T cell exhaustion. An alternative CAR that lacked CD3ζ but contained DAP10 stimulatory domains did not cause tonic signaling but efficiently activated γδT cells in the presence of CAR-specific stimuli or cognate leukemic cells [398]. These findings indicate that altering CAR design could mitigate engineered γδT cell exhaustion and on-target/off-target cytotoxicity, two factors that consistently affect the clinical efficacy of CAR-T cells [399].

The improvement and maintenance of in vivo persistence in γδT cells also represent obstacles that may be overcome by employing molecular factors that support cell survival and functionality. Consequently, it is beneficial to add more appropriate costimulators to CAR for γδT cells. Although it has been demonstrated that the most widely used costimulatory molecules in CAR-T therapy, CD28 and 4-1BB, are expressed in γδT cells and control their proliferation and activation [400, 401], it is unclear how these molecules affect the fate of γδT cells when working synergistically with other CAR components, particularly in the case of CD28, whose role in γδT cells remains controversial [402]. Other favorable γδT cell factors such as CD27, which has been demonstrated to increase γδT cell proliferation and activation [403], are also worth investigating and potentially incorporating into CARs.

Despite significant progress in preclinical and early clinical studies with CAR-γδT cells in hematological malignancies, their clinical efficacy in solid tumors remains uncertain and may be affected by the complexity and heterogeneity of the immunosuppressive TME [386]. To address the existing and forthcoming challenges in clinical applications, a thorough understanding of CAR-γδT cells is required. However, the potential of CAR-γδT cell therapy cannot be overlooked. The future development of CAR-γδT cell therapy still deserves considerable attention.

CAR-NKT: new treatment options for solid tumors

NKT cells are a subset of innate T cells that acquire the properties of NK cells after developing in the thymus. Therefore, NKT cells express both NK cell and T cell receptors and possess both specific and non-specific killing functions. They also have the capacity to modulate recruitment, activation, and immune response in numerous innate and adaptive immune cells by secreting various cytokines and chemokines or through direct interaction. There are two types of NKT cells, with type I (invariant natural killer T, iNKT) receiving the majority of research attention. Studies have found that NKT cells play an important role in various diseases, such as cancers, infections, and autoimmune diseases [404]. Therefore, adoptive therapy based on NKT cells has been explored in clinical research [405,406,407]. In contrast to NK cells, the direct killing action of NKT cells depends on the presentation of CD1d glycolipids to invariant TCR, similar to how T cells recognize HLA-restricted targets. However, because most tumors are CD1d-negative, NKT cells are unable to perform the direct killing function of NK cells; however, the use of CAR can help compensate for this deficiency of NKT cells.

Considering the success of CAR-T cell therapy, CAR has also been investigated in relation to NKT cells. Using a retrovirus, Metelitsa et al. constructed PBMC-derived CAR-NKT cells that target GD2 and CD19 and discovered that they could destroy tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo. They also found that CAR can induce Th1-like polarization of NKT cells when 4-1BB serves as the costimulatory molecule [408, 409]. Karadimitris et al. developed lentivirus-based, CD19-targeting CAR-NKT cells and demonstrated their CAR- and CD1d-dependent anti-tumor effects in vitro and in vivo [410]. Uslu et al. used mRNA electroporation to construct PBMC-derived CAR-NKT cells that targeted CSPG4 and found that the anti-tumor effect of CAR-NKT cells was comparable to that of CAR-T cells but showed better in vivo safety [411]. These studies support the feasibility of developing CAR-NKT cell therapies.

Advantages

CAR-NKT cell therapy may compensate for the shortcomings of CAR-T cell therapy owing to its advantage of dual NK cell and T cell properties.

1.
Safety

In contrast to conventional CAR-T cell therapy, CAR-NKT cell therapy typically does not result in an excessive immune response. Uslu et al. found that CSPG4-targeting CAR-NKT cells produced noticeably fewer CRS-related cytokines (such as IL-6) while exhibiting tumor cytotoxicity comparable to that of CAR-T cells [411]. Furthermore, CAR-NKT therapy has not led to severe CRS or NT in conducted clinical trials.

2.
Multiple killing modes

Owing to their NK-like properties, CAR-NKT cell exhibits diverse tumor-eliminating methods (Fig. 7B). In addition to the targeted killing function mediated by CAR, CAR-NKT cells can also directly kill tumor cells in a target-independent manner by utilizing FASL, TNF-α, TRAIL, and perforin/granzyme, which makes them preferable for eliminating extremely heterogeneous tumors. As the non-specific killing of NKT cells is dependent on the expression of CD1d by target cells, NKT is not effective against CD1d-negative tumor cells; however, combining it with CAR can compensate for this limitation. According to studies by Metelitsa and Karadimitris, CAR-NKT cells can possess a dual-specific killing ability via CAR- and CD1d-dependent mechanisms [408, 410], yielding a stronger anti-tumor effect than CAR-T cells and effectively eliminating relapsed lymphoma. Moreover, CAR-NKT cells eradicated brain tumors when CAR-T cells could not, suggesting that CAR-NKT cells can cross the blood–brain barrier [410]. These findings demonstrate that CAR-NKT cells might be more effective against tumors than CAR-T cells.

3.
TME improvement

CAR-NKT cells can recruit and activate other immune cells by initiating the Th1/Th2 cytokine cascade, which includes activating NK cells and maturing DCs to stimulate cytotoxic T lymphocytes and inhibit TAMs. Metelitsa et al. discovered that CAR-NKT cells that used 4-1BB as a costimulatory molecule tended to polarize toward Th1 cells, with increased levels of both IFN-γ and GM-CSF but a lack of IL-4 and IL-10. Furthermore, they found that CAR-NKT cells can also kill CD1d⁺ M2 macrophages [408], indicating their potential ability to improve the TME.

4.
Universal therapy

In contrast to T cells, NKT cells recognize CD1d, a non-classical MHC-I-like molecule. Consequently, CAR-NKT cell therapy does not induce GvHD, making universal CAR-NKT cell therapy more feasible. According to the current anti-CD19 CAR-NKT phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03774654) data published by Athenex Inc., seven patients who received allogeneic CAR-NKT therapy exhibited a good safety profile and did not develop GvHD [412, 413]. This demonstrates the potential of CAR-NKT cell therapy as a universal therapy.

Research progress

Thus far, only five CAR-NKT clinical trials have been registered, four of which are ongoing (Fig. 2A, Table 2). Kuur Therapeutics published the interim phase 1 clinical trial results of their autologous GD2-targeting CAR-NKT cells for the treatment of relapsed or resistant neuroblastoma (NCT03294954) in 2020. In this study, CAR-NKT cells were produced from the PBMCs of three patients via retroviral transduction and were expanded for 15, 14, and 9 days in the case of patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively. After being infused into patients, CAR-NKT cells secreting IL-15 expanded in vivo, effectively infiltrated tumor sites, and mediated tumor regression. One of the three patients achieved CR and bone metastases regressed, and none of the patients experienced significant side effects [414]. This study suggests that NKT cells, despite being rare in PB, can be genetically modified to express a CAR, expanded on a clinical scale, and safely used to treat patients. Furthermore, three clinical trials of CD19-targeting CAR-NKT cells (NCT03774654, NCT05487651, NCT04814004) for the treatment of B cell lymphoma are ongoing (Table 2), but no data have been published yet.

Challenges and potential solutions

1.
Cell scarcity

The main problem with CAR-NKT cell therapy is the scarcity of NKT cells, which only account for 0.1–1% of PB T lymphocytes. While CAR-NKT cells can be expanded in vitro to a sufficient quantity and then reinfused back into the body, this long-term expansion process may also reduce their potency. In a GD2-targeting CAR-NKT cell clinical trial, CAR-NKT cells with longer ex vivo expansion periods exhibited worse persistence when reinfused into patients. Additionally, NKT cells gradually lose their function when they are repeatedly stimulated in vitro with tumor cells [414]. This implies that although NKT cells can proliferate substantially in vitro and generate a sufficient number of cells for use in therapy, their activity might be compromised during prolonged ex vivo expansion.

Numerous attempts have been made to address this issue, and several potential solutions have been proposed. In 2019, Yang et al. genetically engineered iNKT TCR into hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to generate engineered iNKT cells. These HSC-iNKT cells were very similar to endogenous iNKT cells and effectively inhibited the growth of both multiple myeloma and melanoma xenografts in vivo [415]. Fujii et al. attempted to obtain a large number of iNKT cells using iPSCs by creating iPSCs from NKT cells isolated from PB and then converted these iPSCs back to iNKTs after the iPSCs were expanded. These iPSC-derived NKT cells were significantly more potent than parental iNKTs in terms of cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity [416]. Currently, these iPSC-derived iNKTs are being tested in clinical trials for head and neck cancer in Japan [417].

2.
Poor persistence in vivo

The activity and proliferation of CAR-NKT cells gradually decline after being infused into the body, which is frequently associated with tumor recurrence. Consequently, multiple infusions of CAR-NKT cells are required to achieve the desired therapeutic effect, which exacerbates the problem of NKT cell scarcity. Attempts to improve the in vivo persistence of CAR-NKT cells, rather than repeated injections, represent a more effective strategy to address their limitations to clinical application. Metelitsa et al. showed that CD62L⁺ NKT cells outperform CD62L⁻ NKT cells in terms of proliferation and survival after repeated antigen stimulation, and that CD62L⁺ NKT cells have better persistence and anti-tumor activity in mouse tumor models [409]. Consequently, they investigated strategies to enrich CD62L⁺ NKT cells and discovered that introducing certain cytokines would produce the desired outcomes. In preclinical and clinical trials of anti-GD2 CAR-NKT cells, they found that IL-15 co-expression increased the proportion of CD62L⁺ cells and improved CAR-NKT cell persistence in vivo [414, 418]. IL-21 is another cytokine that is specifically protective of CD62L⁺ NKT cells and boosts their effector capabilities and can be used to expand CAR-NKT cells ex vivo and improve therapeutic efficacy [419]. These results imply that it is feasible to produce CD62L-enriched NKT cells for efficient cancer immunotherapy.

In conclusion, even though few studies have been completed thus far, the existing results indicate that CAR-NKT cell therapy has considerable potential for the treatment of solid tumors, particularly when its limitations are addressed.

Gene transduction strategies in ACT

ACT requires the introduction of CAR or TCR genes into recipient cells as well as the precise control of gene expression. The emergence of a series of gene transduction strategies has advanced the development of ACT. An ideal gene transduction strategy should be safe, have low immunogenicity, and be able to carry as large a fragment of the gene as feasible while also allowing the transduced gene to remain stable or be expressed long term in the recipient cells. Currently, three types of gene transduction strategies are frequently used in ACT: (1) viral vectors, including retrovirus, lentivirus, and adenovirus vectors; (2) non-viral vectors such as transposons, mRNA transduction, and DNA transduction; and (3) gene editing tools such as CRISPR/Cas9, TALEN, and ZFN (Fig. 8). Although these gene transduction strategies have considerably enhanced the potential of engineered immune cells, they are limited by problems such as insertion mutation, poor transduction effectiveness, and high cost.

Viral vectors

γ-retrovirus

The retroviral family contains seven members, among which only γ-retrovirus is clinically used. All retroviruses have three structural genes: gag, which encodes viral structural proteins; pol, which encodes reverse transcriptase and integrase for viral replication; and env3, which encodes viral envelope glycoproteins. The γ-retrovirus can transport a sizable amount of genetic cargo, transduce various cell types, integrate foreign genes into the host’s genome to ensure sustained expression, and scale up production rapidly for clinical translation. Owing to these advantages, γ-retrovirus was the first viral vector approved for use in clinical trials [420], as well as the first vector employed in CAR-T cell preparation [421]. In 2003, Brentjens et al. successfully harvested 51% positively transduced CAR-T cells by infecting T cells with γ-retrovirus carrying anti-CD19 CAR genes. These CAR-T cells effectively lysed CD19-positive tumor cells and prolonged the survival time of tumor-bearing mice. The γ-retrovirus has been extensively used in clinical trials of immune cell therapy and has resulted in positive outcomes. Davila et al. used γ-retrovirus to produce CD19-targeting CAR-T cells, which, when combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of 16 patients with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, resulted in a CR as high as 88% [422]. Liu et al. used γ-retrovirus to construct CAR-NK cells expressing anti-CD19 CAR, IL-15, and inducible caspase-9 with a final transduction efficiency of 49.0% (range 22.7–66.5%). These CAR-NK cells were tested in a clinical trial involving 11 patients with CD19-positive tumors, with eight responding and seven achieving CR [319]. Furthermore, Yescarta and Tecartus, two currently marketed CAR-T cell therapy products, both use γ-retrovirus as the gene delivery vector, demonstrating the applicability of γ-retrovirus in the preparation of cell therapy products. However, the integration site of γ-retrovirus is often close to the promoter, which can alter the activity of nearby genes. Therefore, γ-retroviruses have the potential to transform healthy cells into cancerous cells if integration occurs in proto- or anti-oncogenes [354, 423]. Some patients in a gene therapy clinical trial with γ-retrovirus experienced an insertion mutation, leading to the occurrence of clonal T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia [424]. However, excessive concern is unwarranted because it is unlikely to occur frequently. Research has shown that mature T cells can resist tumorigenic transformation via apoptosis and epigenetic mechanisms [425]. Furthermore, no evidence of vector-induced cell immortality was found in a long-term trial (> 500 patient-years of follow-up) involving the use of γ-retrovirus to transduce T cells to treat HIV [426]. Moreover, if necessary, adding suicide elements to CAR could eliminate the potential transform risk caused by γ-retrovirus integration. Nevertheless, owing to the drawbacks of γ-retroviruses, such as their inability to infect non-dividing cells and the greater influence on the host transcriptome [427], lentivirus vectors have gradually replaced them in clinical trials [428].

Lentivirus

The lentiviral vector was established by transforming human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1). Lentiviruses have a unique cis-acting element called central polypurine tract (cPPT) that allows them to efficiently transduce resting T cells without undergoing mitosis. The lentiviral genome includes gag, pol, and env, which are shared by retroviruses, as well as two regulatory genes, tat and rev, and four accessory genes, vif, vpr, vpu, and nef, which are responsible for coding essential proteins for virus replication, binding, infection, and release [429]. The lentiviral vector has been updated and iterated to the third generation. Additionally, its safety was increased by incorporating self-inactivating transformations, reducing homologous sequences, deleting non-essential genes, dispersing viral genes in different plasmids, and other methods [430,431,432]. Only the gag, pol, and rev genes from the HIV-1 genome are retained by the packaging system of the third-generation lentiviral vector, and these genes are dispersed across three separate plasmids (pGag/Pol, pRev, pVSV-G). Furthermore, the lentiviral LTR sequences in the plasmid-encoding gene of interest are altered to be self-inactivating to further improve safety by preventing recombination. To improve target gene expression, the woodchuck hepatitis virus post-transcriptional regulation element (WPRE) was introduced into the 3′LTR to stabilize transcripts, which can quadruple the expression of the target gene when combined with cPPT.

Compared with γ-retroviral vectors, lentiviral vectors have a broader range of applications, higher transduction efficiency, larger transgene load, and lower immunogenicity. Kymriah, Breyanzi, Abecma, Carteyva, Carvykti, and CT103A are commercial CAR-T cell products that all use lentiviral vectors to introduce CAR genes. Furthermore, lentiviral vectors are also being used in an increasing number of clinical trials for cell therapy, which have shown promising results. In a study by Maude et al., 30 patients with r/r acute lymphoblastic leukemia were treated with lentivirus-transduced second-generation CAR-T cells. Consequently, 90% of these patients experienced CR, and the 6-month event-free survival rate was 67%, while the 2-year overall survival rate was 78% [329]. Using lentiviral vectors, Wang et al. produced anti-CD19 CAR-T cells by infecting CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ Tcm subsets. These T cell products were safely administered to eight patients with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, six of whom were progression free at 1 year [433].

However, lentiviral vectors have some limitations. The risk of insertion mutation, for instance, is inevitable because the integration site of lentiviral vectors is still random. There have been instances of T cell clonal expansion due to CAR insertion into TET2 [268] and CBL [434] genes during clinical treatment. Furthermore, the multi-plasmid co-transformation system used in the lentiviral packaging process makes acquiring lentiviruses difficult, expensive, and prone to inconsistencies in quality between batches [435]. Finally, lentiviruses typically have a very low infection efficiency for certain cells, such as NK cells. These issues have motivated researchers to continue exploring more effective gene transfer techniques.

Other viral vectors

In addition to the retroviral family, other viruses are also used for gene transduction, such as adeno-associated virus, adenovirus, and herpes simplex virus. Adeno-associated viruses can infect both dividing and non-dividing cells and are generally not pathogenic or cytotoxic. The risk of insertion mutations is lower with adeno-associated viruses than with retrovirus-derived vectors because of their low rate of gene integration. However, they are greatly limited by their limited packaging capacity (< 5 kb). Although adenoviruses, which have a packaging size of up to 8 kb, can also transduce both dividing and non-dividing cells with a low risk of insertion mutation, they are easily rejected by the host innate immune response [436]. Herpes simplex virus is a large-capacity vector (> 30 kb) with multiple foreign gene insertion sites and high efficiency of gene transduction; however, it exhibits limitations regarding immunogenicity and poor targeting, and the transgene cannot be expressed for a long time in certain organs, such as the brain.

Non-viral vectors

Transposon

Transposons are natural and mobile DNA segments that can change their position within the genome [437]. Transposon systems comprise a transposase and target genes with transposase binding sites. The target gene is cut off and moved by the transposase in conjunction with the inverted terminal repeats at both ends of the target gene [438]. The transposon system has been used extensively in academic research and clinical trials because of its advantages of large gene load, high transduction efficiency, ease of use, limited immunogenicity, and low industrial cost [439]. The two most popular transposon systems are sleeping beauty (SB) and piggyBac (PB), both of which are composed of two plasmids that express the transposase and carry the target gene. Transposition efficiency is closely related to transposase activity. Through the modification of terminal repeats and transposase, transposition systems with different DNA cleavage and transposition activities have been developed, such as SB11 and SB100X of the SB system, and pB and 7pB of the PB system [440,441,442].

The transposon system is an efficient and flexible technique for genetically altering T cells for cancer therapy. SB11 transposase has been used in clinical investigations. In a phase 1/2 clinical trial, Singh et al. produced CD19-targeting CAR-T cells with a CAR-positive rate of over 90% using the SB11 transposon, and these cells demonstrated powerful anti-tumor effects [443] However, when Jin et al. compared the transposition activity of SB11 and SB100X, they discovered that SB100X was roughly 3.6 times more effective than SB11 at producing CAR-T cells, indicating that the potential of SB system in T cell editing has yet to be fully explored [444]. Moreover, the SB100X transposon can successfully transfer multiple genes into human T cells using a single electroporation procedure [445], which may have unparalleled advantages for the creation of multi-target CAR-T cells. Additionally, SB transposons have been used in the development of TCR-T cells. Deniger et al. used the SB11 transposon to construct ERBB2 mutation-specific TCR-T cells and demonstrated their potent response to tumor cells and considerable in vitro lethality [446].

Another promising tool for engineering T cells is the PB transposon system. Nakazawa et al. used the PB transposon to introduce eGFP gene into T cells and observed sustained transgene expression for over 6 months in PB-modified T cells [447]. Considering this, the use of the PB transposon system to produce CAR-T cells has recently grown in popularity. For instance, Kubo et al. constructed EPHB4-targeting CAR-T cells with PB and achieved a CAR-positive rate of 78.5%. These cells also exhibited notable memory and low exhaustion characteristics [448]. In a phase 1 clinical trial for multiple myeloma, anti-BCMA CAR-T cells produced using the PB system also showed positive outcomes and had fewer side effects than other comparable anti-BCMA CAR-T cell products [449].

However, the use of transposon systems also faces some challenges that need to be resolved. First, the size of the target gene has a substantial impact on the transposition efficiency of SB transposons; the transposition efficiency is significantly reduced when the target gene is larger than 5 kb. Second, transposon systems that rely on electron transduction consistently result in a large number of cell deaths and are prone to the integrating multiple copies of the target gene [444]. Finally, because SB transposon prefers to be integrated into transcriptional units, and the PB transposon tends to integrate at the transcription start sites and CpG islands [437, 450], both systems face the risk of insertion mutation or even carcinogenesis. In a genome-wide mapping study, the PB system was demonstrated to integrate target genes into 888 known proto-oncogenes in T cells [450]. Additionally, transposons naturally allow transduced genes to repeatedly change their genomic positions, which may result in unpredictable outcomes [451]. It may be possible to increase the safety of the transposon system by shielding transcriptional regulatory elements to prevent the influence on genes close to the integration site or by modifying the transposase to increase the specificity of target recognition, but these measures have not yet been tested clinically [452]. It remains to be further investigated whether the transposon system is superior to other gene transduction methods, particularly in terms of safety.

mRNA transduction

1.
mRNA electroporation

mRNA electroporation is a technique that modifies mRNA to increase its stability before introducing it into the cytoplasm via electron transduction for expression. Gene transduction in this manner challenges the long-held assumption that that mRNA is unstable and cannot be used as a medicinal molecule. Electroporated mRNA is immediately available in the cytosol and does not need to enter the nucleus, which not only improves expression efficiency but also eliminates the possibility of insertional mutagenesis. Therefore, mRNA electroporation may be one of the most secure methods of effective gene transduction. Furthermore, mRNA electroporation also offers advantages such as high transduction efficiency, greater versatility (can transduce nearly any cell type, including quiescent or slowly proliferating cells as well as primary immune cells), easy design and optimization, and the ability to rapidly produce desired cells at a lower cost [453]. Consequently, studies involving mRNA electroporation are becoming more frequent.

Beatty et al. electroporated mRNA encoding mesothelin-specific CAR into activated T cells and successfully produced clinical-grade CAR-T cells with over 91% mean cell survival and a CAR-positive rate of over 98%. These CAR-T cells demonstrated substantial anti-tumor activity in patients without overt evidence of off-tumor/on-target toxicity [454]. These findings support the idea that adoptive transfer of mRNA-transduced CAR-T cells is feasible and safe. Although the currently preferred methods for CAR-T cell preparation are based on retroviral or lentiviral transductions, 10% of patients die from their disease progressing before receiving treatment because of the laborious manufacturing process [455]. mRNA electroporation technology can greatly reduce the preparation time for clinical-grade CAR-T cells and has therefore attracted considerable attention as it would enable patients with aggressive disease to receive CAR-T therapy within a short period. Krug et al. used mRNA electroporation technology to produce a sufficient number of CEA-specific CAR-T cells in only 10 days, resulting in 25.7 ± 2.9% CAR-positive T cells after electroporation and cryoconservation [456]. This reflects the major advantages of mRNA electroporation in clinical applications.

Limited by the inherent instability of mRNA molecules, mRNA electroporation typically only causes transient expression of CAR. This problem can be remedied by repeated injections of mRNA-transduced CAR-T cells in patients, but this increases treatment expenses. However, this deficit of mRNA-transduced CAR-T cells is an advantage in terms of safety because it not only eliminates the risk of insertion mutations but might also avoid unpredictable repercussions such as cross-reaction with normal tissues due to CAR-constitutive expression [191]. Furthermore, electroporation usually causes irreversible damage to cells, which limits the application of mRNA electroporation technology. Therefore, researchers are exploring other alternatives.

2.
Lipid nanoparticle-mediated mRNA transduction

In recent years, nanomaterials have also been used in ACT. Among them, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have achieved promising results in delivering mRNA to produce CAR-T cells. LNPs enter cells and deliver mRNA through endocytosis or membrane fusion. While maintaining transduction efficiency similar to that of electroporation, LNP exhibits low cytotoxicity [457, 458]. Mitchell et al. successfully generated LNP-derived CAR-T cells and displayed in vitro anti-tumor activity comparable to that of electroporation-derived CAR-T cells [457, 458]. However, LNP-mediated mRNA transduction also faces issues such as poor stability, low biocompatibility, poor degradability, and induction of side effects in vivo [459]. Therefore, researchers continue to search for new strategies to address these limitations.

3.
Exosome-mediated mRNA transduction

Exosomes secreted by living cells contain many functional molecules that can mediate material transfer and communication between cells through corresponding receptors. Exosomes have some unique advantages, such as structural stability, effective protection of mRNA from degradation, low immunogenicity, ability to cross the blood–brain barrier, and ease of engineering [459, 460]. Therefore, researchers have attempted to generate CAR-T cells via exosome-mediated gene transduction [459]. Loading CAR-encoding mRNA and expressing anti-CD3/CD28 scFvs on the membrane allow exosomes to be directly used for the activation of and precise delivery of CAR-encoding mRNA to T cells to generate CAR-T cells with tumor-killing functions [459]. However, the cytotoxicity to target cells of exosome-generated CAR-T cells is slightly weaker than that of lentiviral-generated CAR-T cells, which may be due to the low expression level of CAR mediated by exosomes. Furthermore, although the engineered exosomes have not yet been tested in vivo, they provide a potential new strategy for the in vivo preparation of CAR-T cells and require further optimization.

DNA transduction

Similar to mRNA transduction, the delivery of CAR-encoding DNA to immune cells has also been attempted in ACT. DNA has the advantage of being more stable than mRNA.

1.
DNA nanovector electroporation

Harbottle et al. produced a novel DNA nanovector called nS/MARt through several modifications of the original plasmid pEPI [461]. The gene encoding CAR can be loaded on the vector and transduced into cells by electroporation, which can mediate long-term stable expression of the target gene. Compared with lentivirus vector transduction, nS/MART-mediated gene transduction had similar transduction efficiency but achieved higher CAR expression levels. In terms of function, CAR-T cells produced by nS/MARt showed stronger infiltration ability and tumor-specific lysis in vivo. Notably, nS/MARt-generated CAR-T cells induced gene expression for at least 360 days in Jurkat76 cells by electroporation, reflecting the characteristics of stable gene expression mediated by a viral vector but without the risk of genome integration and insertion mutation [461]. To translate nS/MARt-generated CAR-T cells to clinical applications, researchers also devised a production procedure that could provide clinical-grade CAR-T cells capable of transforming from an initial 1 × 10⁹ T cells to 3.6 × 10⁸ functional CAR-T cells within 5 days. This considerably accelerated the generation of CAR-T cells, as a period of 12–14 days is necessary to produce a sufficient CAR-positive cell quantity using conventional lentiviral vectors [462]. Although this nanovector has yet to be tested in clinical trials, it is expected to have a profound impact on the application of CAR-T cell therapy.

2.
Nanomaterial-mediated targeted DNA delivery

A faster approach for generating CAR-T cells is to manufacture immune cells directly in vivo. To bypass the laborious and expensive process of autologous CAR-T cell production in vitro, Stephan et al. employed DNA-carrying nanoparticles to directly program host T cells with leukemia-specific CAR genes in vivo [463]. These nanoparticle-programmed CAR-T cells can rapidly eliminate cancer cells and alleviate tumor burden in mice with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Kim et al. used intratumoral injection of nanocomplexes to deliver IFN-γ-secreting CAR encoding plasmids to macrophages in mice with Neuro-2a xenografts, generating high amounts of CAR-M cells in tumors (accounting for 82% of CAR-positive cells). With the help of autocrine IFN-γ, these cells polarized from the M2 to the M1 phenotype and inhibited tumor growth by directly phagocytosing tumor cells and stimulating anti-tumor responses [375].

With the recent FDA approval of Onpattro from Alnylam, a medication that encapsulates therapeutic siRNAs into an LNP, clinical acceptance of the nanoparticle delivery system has advanced. Nanomaterials have considerable potential for use in CAR-T cell preparation or as an auxiliary strategy to deliver necessary components for transposon and gene editing systems.

Gene editing tools

CRISPR/Cas9

Currently, lentiviral and retroviral vectors are the two main tools for gene transduction in cell therapy. However, both of these vectors can randomly integrate into problematic regions of the genome, thus compromising the quality and therapeutic effects of engineered cells [464, 465]. Therefore, the CRISPR/Cas9 technology, which enables precise gene editing while reducing the possibility of random insertion, has sparked widespread interest.

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is an RNA-guided, targeted gene editing technology that mainly comprises two components: guide RNA (gRNA), which can recognize certain DNA sequences, and Cas9 endonuclease, which cuts DNA at the target sites. Under the guidance of gRNA, Cas9 can localize and cut DNA precisely at the target site to produce double-strand breaks (DSBs), which subsequently activate two distinct repair mechanisms: non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homology-directed repair (HDR). NHEJ can directly connect the break sequences when templates are absent and cause insertion/deletion mutations, whereas the HDR pathway is activated to produce specific insertions, deletions, or mutations in the presence of a donor template [466]. In addition to its capacity for precise gene editing, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has several advantages, including easy design, quick implementation, low cost, and excellent scalability [467]. Because of this, the application of CRISPR/Cas9 system has expanded to almost all genomic targets and has also accelerated the development of engineered cell therapy.

The CRISPR/Cas9 system has demonstrated potential for use in CAR-T cell and TCR-T cell therapies. As it enables simultaneous gene editing at multiple loci, CRISPR/Cas9 is regarded as a groundbreaking gene editing tool for producing universal CAR-T cells. In 2017, Liu et al. [468] used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to knock out TRCA (encoding the endogenous TCRα subunit) and B2M (encoding an essential subunit of the MHC-I molecule) in T cells, producing universal CAR-T cells that greatly reduced tumor growth in mouse models. Since then, an increasing number of studies has been conducted and several have recently started clinical trials [469]. The CRISPR/Cas9 system can also be used to enhance the function of CAR-T cells by deleting immunosuppressive genes or introducing CAR-expressing segments into particular loci. Zhang et al. [470] used CRISPR/Cas9 to construct lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3)-deficient CAR-T cells and discovered that these cells had potent anti-tumor activity in both in vitro and in vivo settings. Ren et al. [218] employed CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multi-gene editing technology to produce CAR-T cells devoid of TCR, MHC-I, and PD-1. These CAR-T cells exhibited reduced allogenic reactivity and elevated anti-tumor activity in vivo. Eyquem et al. [172] employed CRISPR/Cas9 technology to direct a CD19-specific CAR coding sequence into the TRCA locus, placing it under the regulation of endogenous regulatory elements. This not only led to homogeneous CAR expression but also enhanced T cell potency by averting CAR tonic signaling, establishing effective internalization and re-expression of the CAR following single or repeated exposure to an antigen, and delaying effector T cell differentiation and exhaustion. Finally, CRISPR/Cas9 technology also offers a solution to the issue of endogenous and exogenous TCR potentially competing and forming a mixed dimer in TCR-T cell therapy. When Legut et al. [471] used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to remove the natural TCR from T cells and introduce a cancer-reactive TCR, the surface expression of transgenic TCR and the sensitivity of TCR-T cells to the antigen were both markedly improved.

However, the CRISPR/Cas9 system, which uses NHEJ- and/or HDR-mediated gene integration, is not without shortcomings. HDR-mediated gene integration occurs infrequently, and the insertion of large gene fragments is necessary for engineered cell therapy, which makes it more challenging to acquire sufficient edited cells. Although the frequency of DNA integration caused by NHEJ is over 1000 times higher than that of HDR [472], NHEJ-mediated DSB repair is prone to frameshift mutations after insertion/deletion, leading to the interruption of gene open reading frames and premature termination [473]. Furthermore, it was shown that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing has potential off-target effects, in which DNA double-stranded cleavage occurs outside the target site and causes random insertion/deletion mutations by activating cell NHEJ repair mechanisms [474, 475]. Finally, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiple gene editing for immune cells, which requires the simultaneous introduction of multiple genes encoding Cas9 and gRNAs, typically produces multiple cell populations with different combinations of knockout phenotypes. For example, Moriarity et al. used the base editor BE4 for mRNA-mediated editing to knockout TRAC, PDCD1, and B2M in T cells and generated only 21.9 ± 1.1% triple knockout cells, accompanied by a large ratio of single and double knockout cells. After optimizing the system, the proportion of triple knockout cells was increased to more than 80% and generated anti-CD19 CAR-T cells [476]. Collectively, these existing technical imperfections restrict the widespread use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in immune cell therapy. However, improvements in the delivery efficiency and editing precision of Cas9 can lead to major advancements in CRISPR/Cas9 technology in the future.

TALEN

In addition to the CRISPR/Cas9 system, TALENs and ZFNs can also precisely edit genes. Although both have been used in cell therapy, their primary application is to knock out TCR, MHC, or CD52 genes in T cells to generate universal CAR-T cells.

TALEN is an artificially modified restriction endonuclease that consists of an N-terminal domain containing a nuclear localization signal, a central domain with a typical tandem TALE repeat sequence that can recognize a specific DNA sequence, and a C-terminal domain with a FokI endonuclease. Through the DNA recognition module, TALEN binds to the target DNA site, uses FokI nuclease to create a DSB, and, similar to CRISPR/Cas9, uses the inherent HDR or NHEJ repair process to insert or delete specific sequences.

As mentioned previously, TALEN technology has been used to generate universal CAR-T cells. After introducing CD19-specific CAR into T cells using lentiviral vectors, Qasim et al. used TALEN to knock out TRAC and CD52 and construct universal CAR-T cells (UCART19) [477]. When these UCART19 cells were infused into two infants with r/r CD19⁺ B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, molecular remissions were achieved within 28 days, and UCART19 cells persisted during the course of therapy. Moreover, Jo et al. simultaneously disrupted and repurposed the endogenous TRAC and B2M loci using TALEN-mediated gene editing and AAV6-dependent gene insertion to produce TCR- and HLA-ABC-deficient T cells expressing CAR and the NK-inhibitor HLA-E. These hypoimmunogenic universal CAR-T cells blocked the GvHD response and avoided being destroyed by NK and alloresponsive T cells, prolonging their anti-tumor activity [478]. These investigations show the potential of TALEN for immune cell therapy. Notably, the editing effectiveness of TALEN is comparable to, or even superior to, that of CRISPR/Cas9. Jain et al. [479] reported that TALEN demonstrated comparable or even superior editing effectiveness to Cas9 in the heterochromatin region. In some cases, the editing efficiency of TALEN can exceed five times that of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cas9 appears to be more effective in editing euchromatin sites with high transcriptional activity in the genome. This suggests that TALEN may be a superior option for some difficult-to-edit gene regions, and researchers can choose a suitable gene editing method according to the target site.

ZFN

ZFN is a fusion protein composed of zinc lipoprotein that specifically recognizes and binds to DNA and a FokI endonuclease domain. Similar to TALEN, the ZFN system can also mediate specific DSBs of target genes, which then can be repaired through NHEJ or the HDR pathway, resulting in gene knockout or insertion [480]. ZFN has been successfully used in allogeneic CAR-T cell preparation. As early as 10 years ago, Torikai et al. [481, 482] used the SB system to introduce CD19-specific CARs to T cells and then applied the ZFN system to permanently delete TCR or HLA-A. Consequently, they demonstrated that these anti-CD19 CAR-T cells not only maintained anti-tumor activity but also ameliorated GvHD or evaded host T cell recognition, providing a basis for the preparation of universal CAR-T cells. Recently, Brown et al. successfully used the ZFN system to generate off-the-shelf, steroid-resistant CAR-T cells [317, 478] by electrotransferring anti-IL13Rα2 CAR into allogeneic T cells and using an Ad5/F35 vector-delivered ZFN to knock out the glucocorticoid receptor. After dexamethasone selection, these cells displayed dexamethasone-resistant effector activity without evidence for in vitro alloreactivity. Moreover, these cells were well tolerated and produced transient tumor reduction and/or tumor necrosis at the infusion site in four of the six treated research participants, indicating the safety and feasibility of such ZFN-modified cells for use as off-the-shelf allogeneic CAR-T cell products.

However, although TALEN and ZFN have the ability to mediate gene insertion, this feature is currently not applied in ACT due to certain shortcomings that need to be addressed, the most prominent of which is relative inefficiency. Additionally, compared to CRISPR/Cas9, TALENs and ZFNs are more expensive, difficult to handle, and time-consuming, restricting their broad applications, particularly for immune cell therapy, which requires the large-scale preparation of engineered immune cells. Therefore, in existing clinical studies of cell therapy, TALEN and ZFN are mainly used as auxiliary technologies for gene knockout.

Gene transduction is the basis and prerequisite of engineered cell therapy because it has a substantial impact on the quantity and quality of engineered cells. A good gene transduction method should be highly effective, safe, simple to use, and affordable, but no currently available technology possesses all of these characteristics. With the development of immune cell therapy, more immune cell types will be engineered. Consequently, there is a growing need for reliable transduction technology. Optimizing current techniques and investigating new ones that are highly effective, safe, simple to use, inexpensive, and capable of broad cell tropism are therefore urgently necessary. Multiple immune cell therapies will advance rapidly after the development of a sufficient number of transduction techniques suitable for different cell types and cargo features.

Conclusion and perspectives

Here, we reviewed the current status of ACT techniques and the associated gene transduction strategies, along with the advantages, challenges, and potential solutions of these therapies and the progress of related research. Although it is clear that adoptive immune cell therapies have a strong potential to combat most types of human cancers, there is still room for improvement in terms of efficacy and safety for the currently available immunotherapies, and the technologies necessary to optimize immune cell therapies, such as gene transduction and editing, are currently not sufficiently powerful. A deeper understanding of immune cell biology and innovative, interdisciplinary strategies is required to overcome the obstacles currently impeding the potential of many immunotherapies.

CAR-T cell therapy is the most rapidly developing ACT and is becoming more commonly used in tumor therapy. Despite the success of CAR-T cell therapy in treating hematologic malignancies, fighting solid tumors has always been challenging due to a number of obstacles, including the lack of tumor-specific antigens, the ineffectiveness of CAR-T cells in trafficking to and infiltrating tumor sites, and the immunosuppressive TME that negatively affects CAR-T cell activation and persistence in tumor sites. While optimization of CAR-T cell therapy is still being studied, researchers agree that the CAR technology should be expanded to other immune cells with anti-tumor potential. Immune cells other than T cells, such as macrophages and NK cells, have thus been the focus of considerable attention and engineering attempts. Despite some advancement, these innovative immune cell therapies, particularly the recently developed CAR-NK and CAR-M cell therapies, have yet to achieve their full potential. The majority of these technologies face not only TME challenges but also cell-type-specific issues. For instance, CAR-NK cell therapy is laborious to use due to the short lifespan of NK cells and difficulty of gene transduction; CAR-M preparation is difficult, and efficacy in vivo is uncertain due to the highly plastic and difficult-to-expand nature of macrophages.

Although these new technologies offer renewed hope for the treatment of solid tumors, their efficacy is difficult to predict when used alone because they cannot circumvent the potently immunosuppressive TME. This setback must therefore be overcome by developing a technique to directly create a favorable TME or to allow engineered immune cells to remodel the unfavorable TME. The combination of engineered immune cells, particularly CAR-T cells, with small compounds and monoclonal antibodies appears to be a promising solution [483]. A considerable amount of preclinical data, as well as some limited clinical data, demonstrate how these combination tactics can enhance the TME and boost CAR-T cell efficacy. However, before such combinatorial techniques are extensively used in clinical practice, overlapping toxicity must be addressed. Considering the complexity and heterogeneity of the TME and the potential for overlapping toxicities from the combined administration of drugs, engineering strategies that can give immune cells the ability to remodel the unfavorable TME or confer them with intrinsic resistance to immunosuppression may be more promising than targeting only one specific pathway with pharmaceuticals [484]. Such strategies mainly include: (1) CAR optimization (i.e., replacing a costimulating motif or adding signal modules that promote cell survival); (2) forced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-15) or knockout of inhibitory genes (such as PD-1) to increase the activity and persistence of engineered immune cells; and (3) enabling immune cells to stimulate host immune responses, such as the secretion of BiTE. All of these approaches have demonstrated potential in preclinical or clinical studies, but large-scale clinical data are still needed to confirm their efficacy.

Another crucial factor to consider is the fact that most patients with advanced tumors have weakened immune systems as a result of repeated cycles of chemo-radiotherapy. A single type of engineered immune cell cannot significantly exert therapeutic efficacy by inducing endogenous protective immunity, even when equipped with immune excitation tools. In this instance, a positive feedback immune circuit created artificially by combining various types of engineered immune cells to simulate the healthy immune coordination mechanisms is a potential solution that may be considered in the future (Fig. 9). We believe that the strategies for achieving these immune coordinating circuits can be classified into two categories, which we have designated as generation 2 (G2) and generation 3 (G3) ACTs to differentiate them from the first generation of single-type immune cell therapies. The G2 ACTs can achieve complementary recognition or functional complementarity by combining the appropriate immune cell types based on their unique features. For instance, a combination of TCR-T and CAR-NK cells may not only destroy tumor cells with MHC-I, but can also enhance T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity via NK-mediated recruitment of DCs [485]. When CAR-T cells were combined with CAR-M or CAR-NK cells, the interplay between naturally occurring costimulatory receptors/ligands and cytokines/receptors might create a positive synergistic network and hence increase the potency and durability of the anti-tumor immune response. In G3 ACTs, costimulatory receptor/ligand, cytokine, or chemokine interaction networks are artificially implanted in immune cells of interest to create simple but robust and stable innate-adaptive immune coordinating circuits that may improve the infiltration, killing capacity, and persistence of engineered immune cells. The costimulatory receptors/ligands employed can either be chimeric receptors and ligands that have been artificially modified for purposes such as enhancing persistence or naturally occurring molecules between APC and T cells, such as CD58/CD2, B7/CD28. There has been some advancement in this field thus far [486,487,488]. For instance, proof-of-concept research by Li et al. with anti-CD19 CAR-NK and anti-CD19 CAR-T cells showed that combining the two can increase anti-tumor cytotoxicity and persistence, enhance the general safety profile, and prevent tumor recurrence in the mouse xenografts model [487]. Similarly, we recently showed that the combination of CAR-T and CAR-M cells can significantly increase therapeutic efficacy against tumors [488]. It will likely be some time before such multi-cell combination ACTs are widely used in clinical settings, unless there is a breakthrough in the development of off-the-shelf universal cell products, as immediately obtaining multiple types of personalized engineered immune cells is difficult, expensive, and time-consuming. Considering this, future research should focus on developing universal cell products that not only reduce costs and preparation times but also realize the concept of selecting the best single type or combination of immune cells for precision treatment based on patient conditions. This immune cell circuit therapy is expected to become a reality and help in the treatment of solid tumors as immunotherapy theories and technologies advance.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ACT:: Adoptive cell therapy
TCR:: T cell receptor
CAR:: Chimeric antigen receptor
TIL:: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte
NK:: Natural killer cell
M:: Macrophage
NKT:: Natural killer T
TME:: Tumor microenvironment
CRS:: Cytokine release syndrome
ORR:: Objective response rate
CR:: Complete response
FDA:: US Food and Drug Administration
CRISPR/Cas9:: Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9
PDCD1:: Programmed cell death 1
TALEN:: Transcription activator-like effector nucleases
gp100:: Glycoprotein 100
MHC:: Major histocompatibility complex
TAA:: Tumor-associated antigen
MAGE:: Melanoma-associated antigen family
Tn:: Naïve T cell
Tscm:: Stem cell-like memory T cell
Tcm:: Central memory T cell
siRNA:: Small interfering RNA
scFv:: Single-chain variable fragment
NT:: Neurotoxicity
SUPRA:: Split, universal, and programmable
PSMA:: Prostate-specific membrane antigen
PSCA:: Prostate stem cell antigen
synNotch:: Synthetic Notch receptor
SWIFF:: Small molecule protease-based regulation strategy
BiTE:: Bispecific T cell engager
TRUCK:: T cells redirected for universal cytokine-mediated killing
HER2:: Epidermal growth factor receptor 2
LAT:: Linker for activation of T cells
LINK:: Logic-gated intracellular network
FITC:: Fluorescein isothiocyanate
FcγR:: Fragment crystallizable gamma receptor
ADCC:: Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity
rtTA:: Reverse tetracycline transcriptional activator
HCC:: Hepatocellular carcinoma
ECM:: Extracellular matrix
GD2:: Disialoganglioside
BTLA:: B and T lymphocyte attenuator
HVEM:: Herpes virus entry mediator
MDSC:: Myeloid-derived suppressor cell
DC:: Dendritic cell
HIF-1α:: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α
ODD:: Oxygen-dependent degradation domain
HRE:: Hypoxia response element
APC:: Antigen-presenting cell
LOV2:: Light-oxygen-voltage domain 2
GM-CSF:: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
UCNP:: Upconversion nanoplates
CEA:: Carcinoembryonic antigen
CAIX:: Carbonic anhydrase IX
OV:: Oncolytic virus
GvHD:: Graft versus host disease
HvGR:: Host versus graft rejection
BCMA:: B cell maturation antigen
HDAC:: Histone deacetylase
DNMT:: DNA methyltransferase
AP1:: Activator protein 1
FAO:: Fatty acid oxidation
OxPhos:: Oxidative phosphorylation
ROS:: Reactive oxygen species
PB:: Peripheral blood
UCB:: Umbilical cord blood
hESC:: Human embryonic stem cell
iPSC:: Induced pluripotent stem cell
BCL:: B cell lymphoma
AML:: Acute myeloid leukemia
PBMC:: Peripheral blood mononuclear cell
AAV:: Adeno-associated viral
TAM:: Tumor-associated macrophage
MMP:: Matrix metalloproteinases
MerTK:: Mer receptor tyrosine kinase
HSC:: Hematopoietic stem cell
HIV-1:: Human immunodeficiency virus-1
cPPT:: Central polypurine tract
SB:: Sleeping beauty transposon system
PB:: PiggyBac transposon system
LNP:: Lipid nanoparticles
gRNA:: Guide RNA
DSB:: Double-strand break
NHEJ:: Non-homologous end joining
HDR:: Homology-directed repair
LAG-3:: Lymphocyte activation gene-3

References

Knight SR, Shaw CA, Pius R, Drake TM, Norman L, Ademuyiwa AO, Adisa AO, Aguilera ML, Al-Saqqa SW, Al-Slaibi I, Bhangu A. Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries. Lancet. 2021;397(10272):387–97.
Google Scholar
Charmsaz S, Collins DM, Perry AS, Prencipe M. Novel Strategies for cancer treatment: highlights from the 55th IACR annual conference. Cancers. 2019;11(8):1125.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Esfahani K, Roudaia L, Buhlaiga N, Del Rincon SV, Papneja N, Miller WH. A review of cancer immunotherapy: from the past, to the present, to the future. Curr Oncol. 2020;27(12):87–97.
Google Scholar
Cappell KM, Kochenderfer JN. Long-term outcomes following CAR T cell therapy: what we know so far. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20(6):359–71.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dudley M, Wunderlich J, Robbins P, Yang J, Hwu P, Schwartzentruber D, et al. Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science. 2002;298(5594):850–4.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rosenberg SA, Dudley ME. Adoptive cell therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;21(2):233–40.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Goff SL, Dudley ME, Citrin DE, Somerville RP, Wunderlich JR, Danforth DN, et al. Randomized, prospective evaluation comparing intensity of lymphodepletion before adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(20):2389–97.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stevanović S, Draper LM, Langhan MM, Campbell TE, Kwong ML, Wunderlich JR, et al. Complete regression of metastatic cervical cancer after treatment with human papillomavirus-targeted tumor-infiltrating T cells. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(14):1543–50.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Johnson LA, June CH. Driving gene-engineered T cell immunotherapy of cancer. Cell Res. 2017;27(1):38–58.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Natarajan A, Veerapathran A, Wells A, Herman C, Gontcharova v, onimus k, et al. preclinical activity and manufacturing feasibility of genetically modified PDCD-1 knockout (KO) tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy.
Wang RF. Tumor antigens discovery: perspectives for cancer therapy. Mol Med. 1997;3(11):716–31.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Hughes MS, Yang JC, Sherry RM, et al. Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science. 2006;314(5796):126–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Harris DT, Hager MV, Smith SN, Cai Q, Stone JD, Kruger P, et al. Comparison of T cell activities mediated by human TCRs and CARs that use the same recognition domains. J Immunol. 2018;200(3):1088–100.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Robbins PF, Kassim SH, Tran TL, Crystal JS, Morgan RA, Feldman SA, et al. A pilot trial using lymphocytes genetically engineered with an NY-ESO-1-reactive T-cell receptor: long-term follow-up and correlates with response. Clin Cancer. 2015;21(5):1019–27.
CAS Google Scholar
Rapoport AP, Stadtmauer EA, Binder-Scholl GK, Goloubeva O, Vogl DT, Lacey SF, et al. NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-engineered T cells mediate sustained antigen-specific antitumor effects in myeloma. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):914–21.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sun Z, Chen F, Meng F, Wei J, Liu B. MHC class II restricted neoantigen: a promising target in tumor immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2017;392:17–25.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hinrichs CS, Restifo NP. Reassessing target antigens for adoptive T-cell therapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(11):999–1008.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Draper LM, Kwong ML, Gros A, Stevanović S, Tran E, Kerkar S, et al. Targeting of HPV-16+ epithelial cancer cells by TCR gene engineered T cells directed against E6. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(19):4431–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mesri EA, Feitelson MA, Munger K. Human viral oncogenesis: a cancer hallmarks analysis. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(3):266–82.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP. Adoptive cell transfer as personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. Science. 2015;348(6230):62–8.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang QJ, Yu Z, Griffith K, Hanada K, Restifo NP, Yang JC. Identification of T-cell receptors targeting KRAS-mutated human tumors. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4(3):204–14.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Johnson LA, Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Cassard L, Yang JC, Hughes MS, et al. Gene therapy with human and mouse T-cell receptors mediates cancer regression and targets normal tissues expressing cognate antigen. Blood. 2009;114(3):535–46.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Morgan RA, Chinnasamy N, Abate-Daga D, Gros A, Robbins PF, Zheng Z, et al. Cancer regression and neurological toxicity following anti-MAGE-A3 TCR gene therapy. J Immunother (Hagerstown, Md : 1997). 2013;36(2):133–51.
CAS Google Scholar
Workman MJ, Mahe MM, Trisno S, Poling HM, Watson CL, Sundaram N, et al. Engineered human pluripotent-stem-cell-derived intestinal tissues with a functional enteric nervous system. Nat Med. 2017;23(1):49–59.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cieri N, Camisa B, Cocchiarella F, Forcato M, Oliveira G, Provasi E, et al. IL-7 and IL-15 instruct the generation of human memory stem T cells from naive precursors. Blood. 2013;121(4):573–84.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kieback E, Uckert W. Enhanced T cell receptor gene therapy for cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10(5):749–62.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ochi T, Fujiwara H, Okamoto S, An J, Nagai K, Shirakata T, et al. Novel adoptive T-cell immunotherapy using a WT1-specific TCR vector encoding silencers for endogenous TCRs shows marked antileukemia reactivity and safety. Blood. 2011;118(6):1495–503.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sharpe M, Mount N. Genetically modified T cells in cancer therapy: opportunities and challenges. Dis Model Mech. 2015;8(4):337–50.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van Loenen MM, de Boer R, Amir AL, Hagedoorn RS, Volbeda GL, Willemze R, et al. Mixed T cell receptor dimers harbor potentially harmful neoreactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(24):10972–7.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bendle G, Linnemann C, Hooijkaas A, Bies L, de Witte M, Jorritsma A, et al. Lethal graft-versus-host disease in mouse models of T cell receptor gene therapy. Nat Med. 2010;16(5):565–70 (1p following 70).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thomas S, Xue SA, Cesco-Gaspere M, San José E, Hart DP, Wong V, et al. Targeting the Wilms tumor antigen 1 by TCR gene transfer: TCR variants improve tetramer binding but not the function of gene modified human T cells. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2007;179(9):5803–10.
CAS Google Scholar
van der Veken LT, Hagedoorn RS, van Loenen MM, Willemze R, Falkenburg JH, Heemskerk MH. Alphabeta T-cell receptor engineered gammadelta T cells mediate effective antileukemic reactivity. Can Res. 2006;66(6):3331–7.
Google Scholar
van der Veken LT, Coccoris M, Swart E, Falkenburg JH, Schumacher TN, Heemskerk MH. Alpha beta T cell receptor transfer to gamma delta T cells generates functional effector cells without mixed TCR dimers in vivo. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2009;182(1):164–70.
Google Scholar
Springuel L, Lonez C, Alexandre B, Van Cutsem E, Machiels JH, Van Den Eynde M, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-T cells for targeting solid tumors: current challenges and existing strategies. BioDrugs. 2019;33(5):515–37.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Moon EK, Ranganathan R, Eruslanov E, Kim S, Newick K, O’Brien S, et al. Blockade of programmed death 1 augments the ability of human T cells engineered to target NY-ESO-1 to control tumor growth after adoptive transfer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(2):436–47.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kuchuk O, Tuccitto A, Citterio D, Huber V, Camisaschi C, Milione M, et al. pH regulators to target the tumor immune microenvironment in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7(7):e1445452.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu X, Jiang S, Fang C, Yang S, Olalere D, Pequignot EC, et al. Affinity-tuned ErbB2 or EGFR chimeric antigen receptor T cells exhibit an increased therapeutic index against tumors in mice. Can Res. 2015;75(17):3596–607.
CAS Google Scholar
Chen J, Qiu S, Li W, Wang K, Zhang Y, Yang H, et al. Tuning charge density of chimeric antigen receptor optimizes tonic signaling and CAR-T cell fitness. Cell Res. 2023;33:341–54.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Grada Z, Hegde M, Byrd T, Shaffer DR, Ghazi A, Brawley VS, et al. TanCAR: a novel bispecific chimeric antigen receptor for cancer immunotherapy. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2013;2:e105.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Katsarou A, Sjöstrand M, Naik J, Mansilla-Soto J, Kefala D, Kladis G, et al. Combining a CAR and a chimeric costimulatory receptor enhances T cell sensitivity to low antigen density and promotes persistence. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(623):eabh1962.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sterner R, Sterner R. CAR-T cell therapy: current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(4):69.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hirabayashi K, Du H, Xu Y, Shou P, Zhou X, Fuca G, et al. Dual targeting CAR-T cells with optimal costimulation and metabolic fitness enhance antitumor activity and prevent escape in solid tumors. Nat Cancer. 2021;2(9):904–18.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Majzner RG, Rietberg SP, Sotillo E, Dong R, Vachharajani VT, Labanieh L, et al. Tuning the antigen density requirement for CAR T-cell activity. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(5):702–23.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang H, Li F, Cao J, Wang X, Cheng H, Qi K, et al. A chimeric antigen receptor with antigen-independent OX40 signaling mediates potent antitumor activity. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(578):eaba7308.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kawalekar OU, O’Connor RS, Fraietta JA, Guo L, McGettigan SE, Posey AD Jr, et al. Distinct signaling of coreceptors regulates specific metabolism pathways and impacts memory development in CAR T cells. Immunity. 2016;44(2):380–90.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Eshhar Z. Tumor-specific T-bodies: towards clinical application. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1997;45(3–4):131–6.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Melenhorst JJ, Chen GM, Wang M, Porter DL, Chen C, Collins MA, et al. Decade-long leukaemia remissions with persistence of CD4(+) CAR T cells. Nature. 2022;602(7897):503–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gomes da Silva D, Mukherjee M, Srinivasan M, Dakhova O, Liu H, Grilley B, et al. Direct comparison of in vivo fate of second and third-generation CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells in patients with B-cell lymphoma: reversal of toxicity from tonic signaling. Blood. 2016;128(22):1851.
Google Scholar
Ramos CA, Rouce R, Robertson CS, Reyna A, Narala N, Vyas G, et al. In vivo fate and activity of second-versus third-generation CD19-specific CAR-T cells in B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Mol Ther. 2018;26(12):2727–37.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Enblad G, Karlsson H, Gammelgård G, Wenthe J, Lövgren T, Amini RM, et al. A phase I/IIa trial using CD19-targeted third-generation CAR T cells for lymphoma and leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(24):6185–94.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Feng KC, Guo YL, Liu Y, Dai HR, Wang Y, Lv HY, et al. Cocktail treatment with EGFR-specific and CD133-specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in a patient with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):4.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu S, Deng B, Yin Z, Lin Y, An L, Liu D, et al. Combination of CD19 and CD22 CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic transplantation. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(6):671–9.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shah NN, Johnson BD, Schneider D, Zhu F, Szabo A, Keever-Taylor CA, et al. Bispecific anti-CD20, anti-CD19 CAR T cells for relapsed B cell malignancies: a phase 1 dose escalation and expansion trial. Nat Med. 2020;26(10):1569–75.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Qu C, Zou R, Wang P, Zhu Q, Kang L, Ping N, et al. Decitabine-primed tandem CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. Front Immunol. 2022;13:969660.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schneider D, Xiong Y, Wu D, Hu P, Alabanza L, Steimle B, et al. Trispecific CD19-CD20-CD22-targeting duoCAR-T cells eliminate antigen-heterogeneous B cell tumors in preclinical models. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(586):eabc6401.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fousek K, Watanabe J, Joseph SK, George A, An X, Byrd TT, et al. CAR T-cells that target acute B-lineage leukemia irrespective of CD19 expression. Leukemia. 2021;35(1):75–89.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cho JH, Collins JJ, Wong WW. Universal chimeric antigen receptors for multiplexed and logical control of T cell responses. Cell. 2018;173(6):1426–38.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kloss CC, Condomines M, Cartellieri M, Bachmann M, Sadelain M. Combinatorial antigen recognition with balanced signaling promotes selective tumor eradication by engineered T cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(1):71–5.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wilkie S, van Schalkwyk MC, Hobbs S, Davies DM, van der Stegen SJ, Pereira AC, et al. Dual targeting of ErbB2 and MUC1 in breast cancer using chimeric antigen receptors engineered to provide complementary signaling. J Clin Immunol. 2012;32(5):1059–70.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lanitis E, Poussin M, Klattenhoff AW, Song D, Sandaltzopoulos R, June CH, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T Cells with dissociated signaling domains exhibit focused antitumor activity with reduced potential for toxicity in vivo. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1(1):43–53.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roybal KT, Rupp LJ, Morsut L, Walker WJ, McNally KA, Park JS, et al. Precision tumor recognition by T cells with combinatorial antigen-sensing circuits. Cell. 2016;164(4):770–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Morsut L, Roybal KT, Xiong X, Gordley RM, Coyle SM, Thomson M, et al. Engineering customized cell sensing and response behaviors using synthetic notch receptors. Cell. 2016;164(4):780–91.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hyrenius-Wittsten A, Su Y, Park M, Garcia J, Alavi J, Perry N, et al. SynNotch CAR circuits enhance solid tumor recognition and promote persistent antitumor activity in mouse models. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(591):eabd8836.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Choe J, Watchmaker P, Simic M, Gilbert R, Li A, Krasnow N, et al. SynNotch-CAR T cells overcome challenges of specificity, heterogeneity, and persistence in treating glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(591):eabe7378.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Srivastava S, Salter AI, Liggitt D, Yechan-Gunja S, Sarvothama M, Cooper K, et al. Logic-gated ROR1 chimeric antigen receptor expression rescues T cell-mediated toxicity to normal tissues and enables selective tumor targeting. Cancer Cell. 2019;35(3):489–503.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tousley AM, Rotiroti MC, Labanieh L, Rysavy LW, Kim WJ, Lareau C, et al. Co-opting signalling molecules enables logic-gated control of CAR T cells. Nature. 2023;615:507–16.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fedorov VD, Themeli M, Sadelain M. PD-1- and CTLA-4-based inhibitory chimeric antigen receptors (iCARs) divert off-target immunotherapy responses. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(215):215ra172.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Urbanska K, Lanitis E, Poussin M, Lynn RC, Gavin BP, Kelderman S, et al. A universal strategy for adoptive immunotherapy of cancer through use of a novel T-cell antigen receptor. Can Res. 2012;72(7):1844–52.
CAS Google Scholar
Lohmueller JJ, Ham JD, Kvorjak M, Finn OJ. mSA2 affinity-enhanced biotin-binding CAR T cells for universal tumor targeting. Oncoimmunology. 2017;7(1):e1368604.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tamada K, Geng D, Sakoda Y, Bansal N, Srivastava R, Li Z, et al. Redirecting gene-modified T cells toward various cancer types using tagged antibodies. Clin Cancer res. 2012;18(23):6436–45.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim MS, Ma JS, Yun H, Cao Y, Kim JY, Chi V, et al. Redirection of genetically engineered CAR-T cells using bifunctional small molecules. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(8):2832–5.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ma JS, Kim JY, Kazane SA, Choi SH, Yun HY, Kim MS, et al. Versatile strategy for controlling the specificity and activity of engineered T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(4):E450–8.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee YG, Marks I, Srinivasarao M, Kanduluru AK, Mahalingam SM, Liu X, et al. Use of a single CAR t cell and several bispecific adapters facilitates eradication of multiple antigenically different solid tumors. Can Res. 2019;79(2):387–96.
CAS Google Scholar
Kudo K, Imai C, Lorenzini P, Kamiya T, Kono K, Davidoff AM, et al. T lymphocytes expressing a CD16 signaling receptor exert antibody-dependent cancer cell killing. Can Res. 2014;74(1):93–103.
CAS Google Scholar
Zhang RY, Wei D, Liu ZK, Yong YL, Wei W, Zhang ZY, et al. Doxycycline inducible chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD147 for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:233.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gu X, He D, Li C, Wang H, Yang G. Development of Inducible CD19-CAR T cells with a Tet-on system for controlled activity and enhanced clinical safety. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3455.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Drent E, Poels R, Mulders MJ, van de Donk N, Themeli M, Lokhorst HM, et al. Feasibility of controlling CD38-CAR T cell activity with a Tet-on inducible CAR design. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):e0197349.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Foster AE, Mahendravada A, Shinners NP, Chang WC, Crisostomo J, Lu A, et al. Regulated expansion and survival of chimeric antigen receptor-modified t cells using small molecule-dependent Inducible MyD88/CD40. Mol Ther. 2017;25(9):2176–88.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Juillerat A, Tkach D, Busser BW, Temburni S, Valton J, Duclert A, et al. Modulation of chimeric antigen receptor surface expression by a small molecule switch. BMC Biotechnol. 2019;19(1):44.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mestermann K, Giavridis T, Weber J, Rydzek J, Frenz S, Nerreter T, et al. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib acts as a pharmacologic on/off switch for CAR T cells. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(499):eaau5907.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Di Stasi A, Tey SK, Dotti G, Fujita Y, Kennedy-Nasser A, Martinez C, et al. Inducible apoptosis as a safety switch for adoptive cell therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(18):1673–83.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou X, Dotti G, Krance RA, Martinez CA, Naik S, Kamble RT, et al. Inducible caspase-9 suicide gene controls adverse effects from alloreplete T cells after haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2015;125(26):4103–13.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Serafini M, Manganini M, Borleri G, Bonamino M, Imberti L, Biondi A, et al. Characterization of CD20-transduced T lymphocytes as an alternative suicide gene therapy approach for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease. Hum Gene Ther. 2004;15(1):63–76.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Griffioen M, van Egmond EH, Kester MG, Willemze R, Falkenburg JH, Heemskerk MH. Retroviral transfer of human CD20 as a suicide gene for adoptive T-cell therapy. Haematologica. 2009;94(9):1316–20.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Philip B, Kokalaki E, Mekkaoui L, Thomas S, Straathof K, Flutter B, et al. A highly compact epitope-based marker/suicide gene for easier and safer T-cell therapy. Blood. 2014;124(8):1277–87.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang X, Chang WC, Wong CW, Colcher D, Sherman M, Ostberg JR, et al. A transgene-encoded cell surface polypeptide for selection, in vivo tracking, and ablation of engineered cells. Blood. 2011;118(5):1255–63.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu X, Barrett DM, Jiang S, Fang C, Kalos M, Grupp SA, et al. Improved anti-leukemia activities of adoptively transferred T cells expressing bispecific T-cell engager in mice. Blood Cancer J. 2016;6(6):e430.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Choi BD, Yu X, Castano AP, Bouffard AA, Schmidts A, Larson RC, et al. CAR-T cells secreting BiTEs circumvent antigen escape without detectable toxicity. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(9):1049–58.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Correia AL, Guimaraes JC, Auf der Maur P, De Silva D, Trefny MP, Okamoto R, et al. Hepatic stellate cells suppress NK cell-sustained breast cancer dormancy. Nature. 2021;594:566–71.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cao G, Zhang G, Liu M, Liu J, Wang Q, Zhu L, et al. GPC3-targeted CAR-T cells secreting B7H3-targeted BiTE exhibit potent cytotoxicity activity against hepatocellular carcinoma cell in the in vitro assay. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2022;31:101324.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yin Y, Rodriguez JL, Li N, Thokala R, Nasrallah MP, Hu L, et al. Locally secreted BiTEs complement CAR T cells by enhancing killing of antigen heterogeneous solid tumors. Mol Ther. 2022;30(7):2537–53.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kantarjian H, Stein A, Gökbuget N, Fielding AK, Schuh AC, Ribera JM, et al. Blinatumomab versus chemotherapy for advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(9):836–47.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu J, Wang W, Huang H. Efficacy and safety of bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody blinatumomab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Hematology. 2019;24(1):199–207.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Koneru M, Purdon TJ, Spriggs D, Koneru S, Brentjens RJ. IL-12 secreting tumor-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells eradicate ovarian tumors in vivo. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4(3):e994446.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yeku OO, Purdon TJ, Koneru M, Spriggs D, Brentjens RJ. Armored CAR T cells enhance antitumor efficacy and overcome the tumor microenvironment. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10541.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Koneru M, O’Cearbhaill R, Pendharkar S, Spriggs DR, Brentjens RJ. A phase I clinical trial of adoptive T cell therapy using IL-12 secreting MUC-16(ecto) directed chimeric antigen receptors for recurrent ovarian cancer. J Transl Med. 2015;13:102.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Perna SK, Pagliara D, Mahendravada A, Liu H, Brenner MK, Savoldo B, et al. Interleukin-7 mediates selective expansion of tumor-redirected cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) without enhancement of regulatory T-cell inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(1):131–9.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chinnasamy D, Yu Z, Kerkar SP, Zhang L, Morgan RA, Restifo NP, et al. Local delivery of interleukin-12 using T cells targeting VEGF receptor-2 eradicates multiple vascularized tumors in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(6):1672–83.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pegram HJ, Lee JC, Hayman EG, Imperato GH, Tedder TF, Sadelain M, et al. Tumor-targeted T cells modified to secrete IL-12 eradicate systemic tumors without need for prior conditioning. Blood. 2012;119(18):4133–41.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
You F, Jiang L, Zhang B, Lu Q, Zhou Q, Liao X, et al. Phase 1 clinical trial demonstrated that MUC1 positive metastatic seminal vesicle cancer can be effectively eradicated by modified Anti-MUC1 chimeric antigen receptor transduced T cells. Sci China Life Sci. 2016;59(4):386–97.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chmielewski M, Kopecky C, Hombach AA, Abken H. IL-12 release by engineered T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors can effectively Muster an antigen-independent macrophage response on tumor cells that have shut down tumor antigen expression. Can Res. 2011;71(17):5697–706.
CAS Google Scholar
Chen Y, Sun C, Landoni E, Metelitsa L, Dotti G, Savoldo B. Eradication of neuroblastoma by T cells redirected with an optimized GD2-specific chimeric antigen receptor and interleukin-15. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(9):2915–24.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chou C, Fraessle S, Steinmetz R, Hawkins RM, Phi T-D, Busch D, et al. Combination of NKTR-255, a polymer conjugated human IL-15, with CD19 CAR t cell immunotherapy in a preclinical lymphoma model. Blood. 2019;134:2866.
Google Scholar
Ataca Atilla P, Tashiro H, McKenna MK, Srinivasan M, Simons BW, Stevens AM, et al. Enhancing the effect of CLL-1 CAR T cells with interleukin-15 for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2019;134:3912.
Google Scholar
Hoyos V, Savoldo B, Quintarelli C, Mahendravada A, Zhang M, Vera J, et al. Engineering CD19-specific T lymphocytes with interleukin-15 and a suicide gene to enhance their anti-lymphoma/leukemia effects and safety. Leukemia. 2010;24(6):1160–70.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krenciute G, Prinzing BL, Yi Z, Wu MF, Liu H, Dotti G, et al. Transgenic expression of IL15 improves antiglioma activity of IL13Rα2-CAR T cells but results in antigen loss variants. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5(7):571–81.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hurton LV, Singh H, Najjar AM, Switzer KC, Mi T, Maiti S, et al. Tethered IL-15 augments antitumor activity and promotes a stem-cell memory subset in tumor-specific T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(48):E7788–97.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Avanzi MP, Yeku O, Li X, Wijewarnasuriya DP, van Leeuwen DG, Cheung K, et al. Engineered tumor-targeted T cells mediate enhanced anti-tumor efficacy both directly and through activation of the endogenous immune system. Cell Rep. 2018;23(7):2130–41.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chmielewski M, Abken H. CAR T cells releasing IL-18 convert to T-Bet(high) FoxO1(low) effectors that exhibit augmented activity against advanced solid tumors. Cell Rep. 2017;21(11):3205–19.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hu B, Ren J, Luo Y, Keith B, Young RM, Scholler J, et al. Augmentation of antitumor immunity by human and mouse CAR T cells secreting IL-18. Cell Rep. 2017;20(13):3025–33.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen Y, Lu B. Guided delivery of the “alarming” cytokine IL-33 to tumor by chimeric antigen receptor T cells. J Immunol. 2017;198:204–23.
Google Scholar
Li X, Daniyan AF, Lopez AV, Purdon TJ, Brentjens RJ. Cytokine IL-36γ improves CAR T cell functionality and induces endogenous anti-tumor response. Leukemia. 2020;35:506–21.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Leonard JP, Sherman ML, Fisher GL, Buchanan LJ, Larsen G, Atkins MB, et al. Effects of single-dose interleukin-12 exposure on interleukin-12-associated toxicity and interferon-gamma production. Blood. 1997;90(7):2541–8.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang L, Morgan RA, Beane JD, Zheng Z, Dudley ME, Kassim SH, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes genetically engineered with an inducible gene encoding interleukin-12 for the immunotherapy of metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(10):2278–88.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roybal KT, Williams JZ, Morsut L, Rupp LJ, Kolinko I, Choe JH, et al. Engineering T cells with customized therapeutic response programs using synthetic notch receptors. Cell. 2016;167(2):419–32.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ma X, Shou P, Smith C, Chen Y, Du H, Sun C, et al. Interleukin-23 engineering improves CAR T cell function in solid tumors. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(4):448–59.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Caruana I, Savoldo B, Hoyos V, Weber G, Liu H, Kim ES, et al. Heparanase promotes tumor infiltration and antitumor activity of CAR-redirected T lymphocytes. Nat Med. 2015;21(5):524–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ramanathan RK, McDonough SL, Philip PA, Hingorani SR, Lacy J, Kortmansky JS, et al. Phase IB/II randomized study of FOLFIRINOX plus pegylated recombinant human hyaluronidase versus FOLFIRINOX alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: SWOG S1313. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(13):1062–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Suarez ER, de Chang K, Sun J, Sui J, Freeman GJ, Signoretti S, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells secreting anti-PD-L1 antibodies more effectively regress renal cell carcinoma in a humanized mouse model. Oncotarget. 2016;7(23):34341–55.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rafiq S, Yeku OO, Jackson HJ, Purdon TJ, van Leeuwen DG, Drakes DJ, et al. Targeted delivery of a PD-1-blocking scFv by CAR-T cells enhances anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(9):847–56.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Boice M, Salloum D, Mourcin F, Sanghvi V, Amin R, Oricchio E, et al. Loss of the HVEM tumor suppressor in lymphoma and restoration by modified CAR-T cells. Cell. 2016;167(2):405–18.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Johnson LR, Lee DY, Eacret JS, Ye D, June CH, Minn AJ. The immunostimulatory RNA RN7SL1 enables CAR-T cells to enhance autonomous and endogenous immune function. Cell. 2021;184(19):4981–95.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fu W, Lei C, Liu S, Cui Y, Wang C, Qian K, et al. CAR exosomes derived from effector CAR-T cells have potent antitumour effects and low toxicity. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4355.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yang P, Cao X, Cai H, Feng P, Chen X, Zhu Y, et al. The exosomes derived from CAR-T cell efficiently target mesothelin and reduce triple-negative breast cancer growth. Cell Immunol. 2021;360:104262.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang Y, Zhou H, Sun Y, Huang Y. Acid-sensing ion channel 1: potential therapeutic target for tumor. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;155:113835.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Muz B, de la Puente P, Azab F, Azab AK. The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia. 2015;3:83–92.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Scharping NE, Rivadeneira DB, Menk AV, Vignali PDA, Ford BR, Rittenhouse NL, et al. Mitochondrial stress induced by continuous stimulation under hypoxia rapidly drives T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(2):205–15.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Byrnes JR, Weeks AM, Shifrut E, Carnevale J, Kirkemo L, Ashworth A, et al. Hypoxia is a dominant remodeler of the effector t cell surface proteome relative to activation and regulatory T cell suppression. Mol Cell Proteom. 2022;21(4):100217.
CAS Google Scholar
Calcinotto A, Filipazzi P, Grioni M, Iero M, De Milito A, Ricupito A, et al. Modulation of microenvironment acidity reverses anergy in human and murine tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes. Can Res. 2012;72(11):2746–56.
CAS Google Scholar
Juillerat A, Marechal A, Filhol JM, Valogne Y, Valton J, Duclert A, et al. An oxygen sensitive self-decision making engineered CAR T-cell. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39833.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kosti P, Opzoomer JW, Larios-Martinez KI, Henley-Smith R, Scudamore CL, Okesola M, et al. Hypoxia-sensing CAR T cells provide safety and efficacy in treating solid tumors. Cell Rep Med. 2021;2(4):100227.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee J-W, Bae S-H, Jeong J-W, Kim S-H, Kim K-W. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1)α: its protein stability and biological functions. Exp Mol Med. 2004;36(1):1–12.
PubMed Google Scholar
He H, Liao Q, Zhao C, Zhu C, Feng M, Liu Z, et al. Conditioned CAR-T cells by hypoxia-inducible transcription amplification (HiTA) system significantly enhances systemic safety and retains antitumor efficacy. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(10):e002755.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang W, He Q, Lopez B, Hu J, Kundu A, Andraza M, et al., editors. Logic-gating HER2 CAR-T to the tumor microenvironment mitigates on-target, off-tumor toxicity without compromising cytotoxicity against HER2-over-expressing tumors. Cancer immunology research; 2021: American Association Cancer Research 615 Chestnut ST, 17th Floor, Philadelphia, PA
Singhal R, Shah YM. Oxygen battle in the gut: hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in metabolic and inflammatory responses in the intestine. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(30):10493–505.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang JL, Morrell G, Rusinek H, Warner L, Vivier P-H, Cheung AK, et al. Measurement of renal tissue oxygenation with blood oxygen level-dependent MRI and oxygen transit modeling. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014;306(6):F579–87.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Assier E, Jullien V, Lefort J, Moreau JL, Di Santo JP, Vargaftig BB, et al. NK cells and polymorphonuclear neutrophils are both critical for IL-2-induced pulmonary vascular leak syndrome. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2004;172(12):7661–8.
CAS Google Scholar
Dhupkar P, Gordon N. Interleukin-2: old and new approaches to enhance immune-therapeutic efficacy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;995:33–51.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aspuria PJ, Vivona S, Bauer M, Semana M, Ratti N, McCauley S, et al. An orthogonal IL-2 and IL-2Rβ system drives persistence and activation of CAR T cells and clearance of bulky lymphoma. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(625):eabg7565.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang Q, Hresko ME, Picton LK, Su L, Hollander MJ, Nunez-Cruz S, et al. A human orthogonal IL-2 and IL-2Rβ system enhances CAR T cell expansion and antitumor activity in a murine model of leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(625):eabg6986.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kagoya Y, Tanaka S, Guo T, Anczurowski M, Wang CH, Saso K, et al. A novel chimeric antigen receptor containing a JAK-STAT signaling domain mediates superior antitumor effects. Nat Med. 2018;24(3):352–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu G, Rui W, Zheng H, Huang D, Yu F, Zhang Y, et al. CXCR2-modified CAR-T cells have enhanced trafficking ability that improves treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Immunol. 2020;50(5):712–24.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang Y, Wang J, Yang X, Yang J, Lu P, Zhao L, et al. Chemokine receptor CCR2b enhanced anti-tumor function of chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting mesothelin in a non-small-cell lung carcinoma model. Front Immunol. 2021;12:628906.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lo AS, Taylor JR, Farzaneh F, Kemeny DM, Dibb NJ, Maher J. Harnessing the tumour-derived cytokine, CSF-1, to co-stimulate T-cell growth and activation. Mol Immunol. 2008;45(5):1276–87.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Di Stasi A, De Angelis B, Rooney CM, Zhang L, Mahendravada A, Foster AE, et al. T lymphocytes coexpressing CCR4 and a chimeric antigen receptor targeting CD30 have improved homing and antitumor activity in a Hodgkin tumor model. Blood. 2009;113(25):6392–402.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Craddock JA, Lu A, Bear A, Pule M, Brenner MK, Rooney CM, et al. Enhanced tumor trafficking of GD2 chimeric antigen receptor T cells by expression of the chemokine receptor CCR2b. J Immunother (Hagerstown, Md: 1997). 2010;33(8):780–8.
CAS Google Scholar
Moon EK, Carpenito C, Sun J, Wang LC, Kapoor V, Predina J, et al. Expression of a functional CCR2 receptor enhances tumor localization and tumor eradication by retargeted human T cells expressing a mesothelin-specific chimeric antibody receptor. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(14):4719–30.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cherkassky L, Morello A, Villena-Vargas J, Feng Y, Dimitrov DS, Jones DR, et al. Human CAR T cells with cell-intrinsic PD-1 checkpoint blockade resist tumor-mediated inhibition. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(8):3130–44.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kloss CC, Lee J, Zhang A, Chen F, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, et al. Dominant-negative TGF-β receptor enhances PSMA-targeted human CAR T cell proliferation and augments prostate cancer eradication. Mol Ther. 2018;26(7):1855–66.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yamamoto TN, Lee PH, Vodnala SK, Gurusamy D, Kishton RJ, Yu Z, et al. T cells genetically engineered to overcome death signaling enhance adoptive cancer immunotherapy. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(4):1551–65.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu X, Ranganathan R, Jiang S, Fang C, Sun J, Kim S, et al. A chimeric switch-receptor targeting PD1 augments the efficacy of second-generation CAR T cells in advanced solid tumors. Can Res. 2016;76(6):1578–90.
CAS Google Scholar
Liu H, Lei W, Zhang C, Yang C, Wei J, Guo Q, et al. A phase I trial using CD19 CAR-T expressing PD-1/CD28 chimeric switch-receptor for refractory or relapsed B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15_suppl):7557.
Google Scholar
Leen AM, Sukumaran S, Watanabe N, Mohammed S, Keirnan J, Yanagisawa R, et al. Reversal of tumor immune inhibition using a chimeric cytokine receptor. Mol Ther. 2014;22(6):1211–20.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mohammed S, Sukumaran S, Bajgain P, Watanabe N, Heslop HE, Rooney CM, et al. Improving chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell function by reversing the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancer. Mol Ther. 2017;25(1):249–58.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wilkie S, Burbridge SE, Chiapero-Stanke L, Pereira AC, Cleary S, van der Stegen SJ, et al. Selective expansion of chimeric antigen receptor-targeted T-cells with potent effector function using interleukin-4. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(33):25538–44.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang Y, Jiang H, Luo H, Sun Y, Shi B, Sun R, et al. An IL-4/21 inverted cytokine receptor improving CAR-T cell potency in immunosuppressive solid-tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1691.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Curran KJ, Seinstra BA, Nikhamin Y, Yeh R, Usachenko Y, van Leeuwen DG, et al. Enhancing antitumor efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cells through constitutive CD40L expression. Mol Ther. 2015;23(4):769–78.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kuhn NF, Purdon TJ, van Leeuwen DG, Lopez AV, Curran KJ, Daniyan AF, et al. CD40 ligand-modified chimeric antigen receptor T cells enhance antitumor function by eliciting an endogenous antitumor response. Cancer Cell. 2019;35(3):473-88.e6.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nguyen NT, Huang K, Zeng H, Jing J, Wang R, Fang S, et al. Nano-optogenetic engineering of CAR T cells for precision immunotherapy with enhanced safety. Nat Nanotechnol. 2021;16(12):1424–34.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huang Z, Wu Y, Allen ME, Pan Y, Kyriakakis P, Lu S, et al. Engineering light-controllable CAR T cells for cancer immunotherapy. Sci Adv. 2020;6(8):eaay9209.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Allen ME, Zhou W, Thangaraj J, Kyriakakis P, Wu Y, Huang Z, et al. An AND-gated drug and photoactivatable Cre-loxP system for spatiotemporal control in cell-based therapeutics. ACS Synth Biol. 2019;8(10):2359–71.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang B, Wang Y, Huang S, Sun J, Wang M, Ma W, et al. Photoswitchable CAR-T cell function in vitro and in vivo via a cleavable mediator. Cell Chem Biol. 2021;28(1):60–9.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rupp LJ, Schumann K, Roybal KT, Gate RE, Ye CJ, Lim WA, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 disruption enhances anti-tumor efficacy of human chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):737.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu W, Zi Z, Jin Y, Li G, Shao K, Cai Q, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 disruption enhances human mesothelin-targeted CAR T cell effector functions. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019;68(3):365–77.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lin Y, Chen S, Zhong S, An H, Yin H, McGowan EM. Phase I clinical trial of PD-1 knockout anti-MUC1 CAR-T cells in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:xi12.
Google Scholar
Wei J, Luo C, Wang Y, Guo Y-L, Dai H, Tong C, et al. PD-1 silencing impairs the anti-tumor function of chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells by inhibiting proliferation activity. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:209.
Condomines M, Arnason J, Benjamin R, Gunset G, Plotkin J, Sadelain M. Tumor-targeted human T cells expressing CD28-based chimeric antigen receptors circumvent CTLA-4 inhibition. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0130518.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao J, Lin Q, Song Y, Liu D. Universal CARs, universal T cells, and universal CAR T cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):132.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Ge W, Li Y, Yang L, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-engineered universal CD19/CD22 Dual-targeted CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(10):2764–72.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mailankody S, Matous JV, Chhabra S, Liedtke M, Sidana S, Oluwole OO, et al. Allogeneic BCMA-targeting CAR T cells in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: phase 1 UNIVERSAL trial interim results. Nat Med. 2023;29(2):422–9.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ottaviano G, Georgiadis C, Gkazi SA, Syed F, Zhan H, Etuk A, et al. Phase 1 clinical trial of CRISPR-engineered CAR19 universal T cells for treatment of children with refractory B cell leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14(668):eabq3010.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Eyquem J, Mansilla-Soto J, Giavridis T, van der Stegen SJ, Hamieh M, Cunanan KM, et al. Targeting a CAR to the TRAC locus with CRISPR/Cas9 enhances tumour rejection. Nature. 2017;543(7643):113–7.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
MacLeod DT, Antony J, Martin AJ, Moser RJ, Hekele A, Wetzel KJ, et al. Integration of a CD19 CAR into the TCR alpha chain locus streamlines production of allogeneic gene-edited CAR T cells. Mol Ther. 2017;25(4):949–61.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Benjamin R, Graham C, Yallop D, Jozwik A, Mirci-Danicar OC, Lucchini G, et al. Genome-edited, donor-derived allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in paediatric and adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of two phase 1 studies. Lancet. 2020;396(10266):1885–94.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Poirot L, Philip B, Schiffer-Mannioui C, Le Clerre D, Chion-Sotinel I, Derniame S, et al. Multiplex genome-edited T-cell manufacturing platform for “Off-the-Shelf” adoptive T-cell immunotherapies. Can Res. 2015;75(18):3853–64.
CAS Google Scholar
Gaudelli NM, Lam DK, Rees HA, Solá-Esteves NM, Barrera LA, Born DA, et al. Directed evolution of adenine base editors with increased activity and therapeutic application. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(7):892–900.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Frigault M, Bishop M, Rosenblatt J, O’Donnell E, Raje N, Cook D, et al. Phase 1 Study of CART-ddBCMA for the treatment of subjects with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2022;140:7439–40.
Google Scholar
Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, Locke FL, Jacobson CA, Hill BT, et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(14):1331–42.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang J, Hu Y, Yang J, Li W, Zhang M, Wang Q, et al. Non-viral, specifically targeted CAR-T cells achieve high safety and efficacy in B-NHL. Nature. 2022;609(7926):369–74.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qi C, Gong J, Li J, Liu D, Qin Y, Ge S, et al. Claudin18.2-specific CAR T cells in gastrointestinal cancers: phase 1 trial interim results. Nat Med. 2022;28(6):1189–98.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
O’Rourke DM, Nasrallah MP, Desai A, Melenhorst JJ, Mansfield K, Morrissette JJD, et al. A single dose of peripherally infused EGFRvIII-directed CAR T cells mediates antigen loss and induces adaptive resistance in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(399):eaaa0984.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Johnson LA, Scholler J, Ohkuri T, Kosaka A, Patel PR, McGettigan SE, et al. Rational development and characterization of humanized anti-EGFR variant III chimeric antigen receptor T cells for glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(275):275ra22.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Heczey A, Louis CU, Savoldo B, Dakhova O, Durett A, Grilley B, et al. CAR t cells administered in combination with lymphodepletion and PD-1 inhibition to patients with neuroblastoma. Mol Ther. 2017;25(9):2214–24.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anthony-Gonda K, Bardhi A, Ray A, Flerin N, Li M, Chen W, et al. Multispecific anti-HIV duoCAR-T cells display broad in vitro antiviral activity and potent in vivo elimination of HIV-infected cells in a humanized mouse model. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(504):eaav5685.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gille I, Claas FHJ, Haasnoot GW, Heemskerk MHM, Heidt S. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) regulatory T-cells in solid organ transplantation. Front Immunol. 2022;13:874157.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Steiner R, Pilat N. The potential for Treg-enhancing therapies in transplantation. Clin Exp Immunol. 2023;211(2):122–37.
PubMed Google Scholar
Arjomandnejad M, Kopec AL, Keeler AM. CAR-T regulatory (CAR-Treg) cells: engineering and applications. Biomedicines. 2022;10(2):287.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mackensen A, Müller F, Mougiakakos D, Böltz S, Wilhelm A, Aigner M, et al. Anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Med. 2022;28(10):2124–32.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
O’Donnell JP, Phillips BP, Yagita Y, Juszkiewicz S, Wagner A, Malinverni D, et al. The architecture of EMC reveals a path for membrane protein insertion. Elife. 2020;9:e57887.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kochenderfer JN, Rosenberg SA. Treating B-cell cancer with T cells expressing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10(5):267–76.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Morgan RA, Yang JC, Kitano M, Dudley ME, Laurencot CM, Rosenberg SA. Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol Ther. 2010;18(4):843–51.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lamers CHJ, Sleijfer S, Vulto AG, Kruit WHJ, Kliffen M, Debets R, et al. Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with autologous T-lymphocytes genetically retargeted against carbonic anhydrase IX: first clinical experience. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(13):e20–2.
PubMed Google Scholar
Lamers CH, Sleijfer S, van Steenbergen S, van Elzakker P, van Krimpen B, Groot C, et al. Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with CAIX CAR-engineered T cells: clinical evaluation and management of on-target toxicity. Mol Ther. 2013;21(4):904–12.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Parkhurst MR, Yang JC, Langan RC, Dudley ME, Nathan DA, Feldman SA, et al. T cells targeting carcinoembryonic antigen can mediate regression of metastatic colorectal cancer but induce severe transient colitis. Mol Ther. 2011;19(3):620–6.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Park A, Fong Y, Kim S, Yang J, Murad J, Lu J, et al. Effective combination immunotherapy using oncolytic viruses to deliver CAR targets to solid tumors. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(559):eaaz1863.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fu W, Lei C, Wang C, Ma Z, Li T, Lin F, et al. Synthetic libraries of immune cells displaying a diverse repertoire of chimaeric antigen receptors as a potent cancer immunotherapy. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6(7):842–54.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Salmon H, Franciszkiewicz K, Damotte D, Dieu-Nosjean M-C, Validire P, Trautmann A, et al. Matrix architecture defines the preferential localization and migration of T cells into the stroma of human lung tumors. J Clin Investig. 2012;122(3):899–910.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li J, Li W, Huang K, Zhang Y, Kupfer G, Zhao Q. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy for solid tumors: lessons learned and strategies for moving forward. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):1–18.
Google Scholar
Bommareddy PK, Shettigar M, Kaufman HL. Integrating oncolytic viruses in combination cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18(8):498–513.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shalhout SZ, Miller DM, Emerick KS, Kaufman HL. Therapy with oncolytic viruses: progress and challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20(3):160–77.
PubMed Google Scholar
Nishio N, Diaconu I, Liu H, Cerullo V, Caruana I, Hoyos V, et al. Armed oncolytic virus enhances immune functions of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in solid tumors. Can Res. 2014;74(18):5195–205.
CAS Google Scholar
Wang G, Zhang Z, Zhong K, Wang Z, Yang N, Tang X, et al. CXCL11-armed oncolytic adenoviruses enhance CAR-T cell therapeutic efficacy and reprogram tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma. Mol Ther. 2023;31(1):134–53.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fang L, Tian W, Zhang C, Wang X, Li W, Zhang Q, et al. Oncolytic adenovirus-mediated expression of CCL5 and IL12 facilitates CA9-targeting CAR-T therapy against renal cell carcinoma. Pharmacol Res. 2023;189:106701.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brown CE, Alizadeh D, Starr R, Weng L, Wagner JR, Naranjo A, et al. Regression of glioblastoma after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(26):2561–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tchou J, Zhao Y, Levine BL, Zhang PJ, Davis MM, Melenhorst JJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of intratumoral injections of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5(12):1152–61.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Katz SC, Burga RA, McCormack E, Wang LJ, Mooring W, Point GR, et al. Phase I hepatic immunotherapy for metastases study of intra-arterial chimeric antigen receptor–modified T-cell therapy for CEA+ liver metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(14):3149–59.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Titov A, Valiullina A, Zmievskaya E, Zaikova E, Petukhov A, Miftakhova R, et al. Advancing CAR T-cell therapy for solid tumors: lessons learned from lymphoma treatment. Cancers. 2020;12(1):125.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
John LB, Devaud C, Duong CP, Yong CS, Beavis PA, Haynes NM, et al. Anti-PD-1 antibody therapy potently enhances the eradication of established tumors by gene-modified T cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(20):5636–46.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Moon EK, Wang LC, Dolfi DV, Wilson CB, Ranganathan R, Sun J, et al. Multifactorial T-cell hypofunction that is reversible can limit the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor-transduced human T cells in solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(16):4262–73.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gargett T, Yu W, Dotti G, Yvon ES, Christo SN, Hayball JD, et al. GD2-specific CAR T cells undergo potent activation and deletion following antigen encounter but can be protected from activation-induced cell death by PD-1 blockade. Mol Ther. 2016;24(6):1135–49.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Adusumilli PS, Zauderer MG, Rusch VW, O’Cearbhaill RE, Zhu A, Ngai DA, et al. Abstract CT036: a phase I clinical trial of malignant pleural disease treated with regionally delivered autologous mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells: safety and efficacy. Cancer Res. 2019;79(13_Supplement):CT036.
Google Scholar
Grosser R, Cherkassky L, Chintala N, Adusumilli PS. Combination immunotherapy with CAR T cells and checkpoint blockade for the treatment of solid tumors. Cancer Cell. 2019;36(5):471–82.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Burga RA, Thorn M, Point GR, Guha P, Nguyen CT, Licata LA, et al. Liver myeloid-derived suppressor cells expand in response to liver metastases in mice and inhibit the anti-tumor efficacy of anti-CEA CAR-T. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64(7):817–29.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tanoue K, Rosewell Shaw A, Watanabe N, Porter C, Rana B, Gottschalk S, et al. Armed oncolytic adenovirus-expressing PD-L1 mini-body enhances antitumor effects of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in solid tumors. Can Res. 2017;77(8):2040–51.
CAS Google Scholar
Li S, Siriwon N, Zhang X, Yang S, Jin T, He F, et al. Enhanced cancer immunotherapy by chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells engineered to secrete checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(22):6982–92.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dozier J, Chen N, Saini J, Chintala N, Adusumilli P. MA11. 01 comparative efficacy of T-cell intrinsic versus extrinsic PD-1 blockade to overcome PD-L1+ tumor-mediated exhaustion. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(10):S392.
Google Scholar
Gautron AS, Juillerat A, Guyot V, Filhol JM, Dessez E, Duclert A, et al. Fine and predictable tuning of TALEN gene editing targeting for improved T cell adoptive immunotherapy. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017;9:312–21.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ren J, Liu X, Fang C, Jiang S, June CH, Zhao Y. Multiplex genome editing to generate universal CAR T cells resistant to PD1 inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(9):2255–66.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pietrobon V, Todd LA, Goswami A, Stefanson O, Yang Z, Marincola F. Improving CAR T-cell persistence. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10828.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Klebanoff CA, Gattinoni L, Restifo NP. CD8+ T-cell memory in tumor immunology and immunotherapy. Immunol Rev. 2006;211:214–24.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Kammula US, Hughes MS, Phan GQ, et al. Durable complete responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma using T-cell transfer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(13):4550–7.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krishna S, Lowery FJ, Copeland AR, Bahadiroglu E, Mukherjee R, Jia L, et al. Stem-like CD8 T cells mediate response of adoptive cell immunotherapy against human cancer. Science. 2020;370(6522):1328–34.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Louis CU, Savoldo B, Dotti G, Pule M, Yvon E, Myers GD, et al. Antitumor activity and long-term fate of chimeric antigen receptor-positive T cells in patients with neuroblastoma. Blood. 2011;118(23):6050–6.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fraietta JA, Lacey SF, Orlando EJ, Pruteanu-Malinici I, Gohil M, Lundh S, et al. Determinants of response and resistance to CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Med. 2018;24(5):563–71.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cohen AD, Garfall AL, Stadtmauer EA, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, Lancaster E, et al. B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(6):2210–21.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Garfall AL, Dancy EK, Cohen AD, Hwang WT, Fraietta JA, Davis MM, et al. T-cell phenotypes associated with effective CAR T-cell therapy in postinduction vs relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2019;3(19):2812–5.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu Y, Guo Y, Wu Z, Feng K, Tong C, Wang Y, et al. Anti-EGFR chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a phase I clinical trial. Cytotherapy. 2020;22(10):573–80.
PubMed Google Scholar
Deng Q, Han G, Puebla-Osorio N, Ma MCJ, Strati P, Chasen B, et al. Characteristics of anti-CD19 CAR T cell infusion products associated with efficacy and toxicity in patients with large B cell lymphomas. Nat Med. 2020;26(12):1878–87.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu Y, Zhang M, Ramos CA, Durett A, Liu E, Dakhova O, et al. Closely related T-memory stem cells correlate with in vivo expansion of CAR.CD19-T cells and are preserved by IL-7 and IL-15. Blood. 2014;123(24):3750–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sabatino M, Hu J, Sommariva M, Gautam S, Fellowes V, Hocker JD, et al. Generation of clinical-grade CD19-specific CAR-modified CD8+ memory stem cells for the treatment of human B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2016;128(4):519–28.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alvarez-Fernández C, Escribà-Garcia L, Caballero AC, Escudero-López E, Ujaldón-Miró C, Montserrat-Torres R, et al. Memory stem T cells modified with a redesigned CD30-chimeric antigen receptor show an enhanced antitumor effect in Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Transl Immunol. 2021;10(4):e1268.
Google Scholar
Buck MD, O’sullivan D, Pearce EL. T cell metabolism drives immunity. J Exp Med. 2015;212(9):1345–60.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
O’Sullivan D, van der Windt GJ, Huang SC-C, Curtis JD, Chang C-H, Buck MD, et al. Memory CD8+ T cells use cell-intrinsic lipolysis to support the metabolic programming necessary for development. Immunity. 2014;41(1):75–88.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
O’Sullivan D. The metabolic spectrum of memory T cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2019;97(7):636–46.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shyer JA, Flavell RA, Bailis W. Metabolic signaling in T cells. Cell Res. 2020;30(8):649–59.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cham CM, Driessens G, O’Keefe JP, Gajewski TF. Glucose deprivation inhibits multiple key gene expression events and effector functions in CD8+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38(9):2438–50.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
MacIver NJ, Michalek RD, Rathmell JC. Metabolic regulation of T lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31:259–83.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Martín-Otal C, Navarro F, Casares N, Lasarte-Cía A, Sánchez-Moreno I, Hervás-Stubbs S, et al. Impact of tumor microenvironment on adoptive T cell transfer activity. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2022;370:1–31.
PubMed Google Scholar
Huang X, Sun T, Wang J, Hong X, Chen H, Yan T, et al. Metformin reprograms tryptophan metabolism to stimulate CD8+ T cell function in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2023.
DeVita VT Jr, Chu E. A history of cancer chemotherapy. Can Res. 2008;68(21):8643–53.
CAS Google Scholar
Eil R, Vodnala SK, Clever D, Klebanoff CA, Sukumar M, Pan JH, et al. Ionic immune suppression within the tumour microenvironment limits T cell effector function. Nature. 2016;537(7621):539–43.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fischer K, Hoffmann P, Voelkl S, Meidenbauer N, Ammer J, Edinger M, et al. Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood. 2007;109(9):3812–9.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Haas R, Smith J, Rocher-Ros V, Nadkarni S, Montero-Melendez T, D’Acquisto F, et al. Lactate regulates metabolic and pro-inflammatory circuits in control of T cell migration and effector functions. PLoS Biol. 2015;13(7):e1002202.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ohta A, Sitkovsky M. Extracellular adenosine-mediated modulation of regulatory T cells. Front Immunol. 2014;5:304.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ohta A, Madasu M, Subramanian M, Kini R, Jones G, Choukèr A, et al. Hypoxia-induced and A2A adenosine receptor-independent T-cell suppression is short lived and easily reversible. Int Immunol. 2014;26(2):83–91.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mastelic-Gavillet B, Navarro Rodrigo B, Décombaz L, Wang H, Ercolano G, Ahmed R, et al. Adenosine mediates functional and metabolic suppression of peripheral and tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):257.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Weinberg F, Ramnath N, Nagrath D. Reactive oxygen species in the tumor microenvironment: an overview. Cancers. 2019;11(8):1191.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dan L, Liu L, Sun Y, Song J, Yin Q, Zhang G, et al. The phosphatase PAC1 acts as a T cell suppressor and attenuates host antitumor immunity. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(3):287–97.
Google Scholar
Giuffrida L, Sek K, Henderson MA, House IG, Lai J, Chen AXY, et al. IL-15 preconditioning augments CAR T cell responses to checkpoint blockade for improved treatment of solid tumors. Mol Ther. 2020;28(11):2379–93.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alizadeh D, Wong RA, Yang X, Wang D, Pecoraro JR, Kuo CF, et al. IL15 enhances CAR-T cell antitumor activity by reducing mTORC1 activity and preserving their stem cell memory phenotype. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(5):759–72.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Quintarelli C, Orlando D, Boffa I, Guercio M, Polito VA, Petretto A, et al. Choice of costimulatory domains and of cytokines determines CAR T-cell activity in neuroblastoma. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7(6):e1433518.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Loschinski R, Böttcher M, Stoll A, Bruns H, Mackensen A, Mougiakakos D. IL-21 modulates memory and exhaustion phenotype of T-cells in a fatty acid oxidation-dependent manner. Oncotarget. 2018;9(17):13125–38.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ, Harms GM, Shen H, Wang L-S, et al. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature. 2009;460(7251):103–7.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Scholz G, Jandus C, Zhang L, Grandclément C, Lopez-Mejia IC, Soneson C, et al. Modulation of mTOR signalling triggers the formation of stem cell-like memory T cells. EBioMedicine. 2016;4:50–61.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mousset CM, Hobo W, Ji Y, Fredrix H, De Giorgi V, Allison RD, et al. Ex vivo AKT-inhibition facilitates generation of polyfunctional stem cell memory-like CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7(10):e1488565.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sukumar M, Liu J, Ji Y, Subramanian M, Crompton JG, Yu Z, et al. Inhibiting glycolytic metabolism enhances CD8+ T cell memory and antitumor function. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(10):4479–88.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van der Windt GJ, Everts B, Chang CH, Curtis JD, Freitas TC, Amiel E, et al. Mitochondrial respiratory capacity is a critical regulator of CD8+ T cell memory development. Immunity. 2012;36(1):68–78.
PubMed Google Scholar
Patsoukis N, Bardhan K, Chatterjee P, Sari D, Liu B, Bell LN, et al. PD-1 alters T-cell metabolic reprogramming by inhibiting glycolysis and promoting lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6692.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pilipow K, Scamardella E, Puccio S, Gautam S, De Paoli F, Mazza EM, et al. Antioxidant metabolism regulates CD8+ T memory stem cell formation and antitumor immunity. JCI Insight. 2018;3(18):e122299.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Geiger R, Rieckmann JC, Wolf T, Basso C, Feng Y, Fuhrer T, et al. L-arginine modulates T cell metabolism and enhances survival and anti-tumor activity. Cell. 2016;167(3):829–42.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yang W, Bai Y, Xiong Y, Zhang J, Chen S, Zheng X, et al. Potentiating the antitumour response of CD8(+) T cells by modulating cholesterol metabolism. Nature. 2016;531(7596):651–5.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yan C, Zheng L, Jiang S, Yang H, Guo J, Jiang LY, et al. Exhaustion-associated cholesterol deficiency dampens the cytotoxic arm of antitumor immunity. Cancer Cell. 2023;41(7):1276–93.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Luu M, Riester Z, Baldrich A, Reichardt N, Yuille S, Busetti A, et al. Microbial short-chain fatty acids modulate CD8(+) T cell responses and improve adoptive immunotherapy for cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4077.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Henning AN, Roychoudhuri R, Restifo NP. Epigenetic control of CD8+ T cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18(5):340–56.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ghoneim HE, Fan Y, Moustaki A, Abdelsamed HA, Dash P, Dogra P, et al. De novo epigenetic programs inhibit PD-1 blockade-mediated T cell rejuvenation. Cell. 2017;170(1):142–57.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Thomas RM, Gamper CJ, Ladle BH, Powell JD, Wells AD. De novo DNA methylation is required to restrict T helper lineage plasticity. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(27):22900–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee M, Li J, Li J, Fang S, Zhang J, Vo ATT, et al. Tet2 inactivation enhances the antitumor activity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Can Res. 2021;81(8):1965–76.
CAS Google Scholar
Fraietta JA, Nobles CL, Sammons MA, Lundh S, Carty SA, Reich TJ, et al. Disruption of TET2 promotes the therapeutic efficacy of CD19-targeted T cells. Nature. 2018;558(7709):307–12.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Martins G, Calame K. Regulation and functions of Blimp-1 in T and B lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:133–69.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kallies A, Xin A, Belz GT, Nutt SL. Blimp-1 transcription factor is required for the differentiation of effector CD8(+) T cells and memory responses. Immunity. 2009;31(2):283–95.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yoshikawa T, Wu Z, Inoue S, Kasuya H, Matsushita H, Takahashi Y, et al. Genetic ablation of PRDM1 in antitumor T cells enhances therapeutic efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy. Blood. 2022;139(14):2156–72.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Quigley M, Pereyra F, Nilsson B, Porichis F, Fonseca C, Eichbaum Q, et al. Transcriptional analysis of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells shows that PD-1 inhibits T cell function by upregulating BATF. Nat Med. 2010;16(10):1147–51.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Agnellini P, Wolint P, Rehr M, Cahenzli J, Karrer U, Oxenius A. Impaired NFAT nuclear translocation results in split exhaustion of virus-specific CD8+ T cell functions during chronic viral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(11):4565–70.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shin H, Blackburn SD, Intlekofer AM, Kao C, Angelosanto JM, Reiner SL, et al. A role for the transcriptional repressor Blimp-1 in CD8(+) T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Immunity. 2009;31(2):309–20.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rao RR, Li Q, Gubbels Bupp MR, Shrikant PA. Transcription factor Foxo1 represses T-bet-mediated effector functions and promotes memory CD8(+) T cell differentiation. Immunity. 2012;36(3):374–87.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stephen TL, Rutkowski MR, Allegrezza MJ, Perales-Puchalt A, Tesone AJ, Svoronos N, et al. Transforming growth factor β-mediated suppression of antitumor T cells requires FoxP1 transcription factor expression. Immunity. 2014;41(3):427–39.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li J, He Y, Hao J, Ni L, Dong C. High levels of eomes promote exhaustion of anti-tumor CD8(+) T cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2981.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang Y, Kurupati R, Liu L, Zhou XY, Zhang G, Hudaihed A, et al. Enhancing CD8(+) T cell fatty acid catabolism within a metabolically challenging tumor microenvironment increases the efficacy of melanoma immunotherapy. Cancer Cell. 2017;32(3):377–91.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
McLane LM, Ngiow SF, Chen Z, Attanasio J, Manne S, Ruthel G, et al. Role of nuclear localization in the regulation and function of T-bet and Eomes in exhausted CD8 T cells. Cell Rep. 2021;35(6):109120.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pauken KE, Wherry EJ. Overcoming T cell exhaustion in infection and cancer. Trends Immunol. 2015;36(4):265–76.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen Z, Ji Z, Ngiow SF, Manne S, Cai Z, Huang AC, et al. TCF-1-centered transcriptional network drives an effector versus exhausted CD8 T cell-fate decision. Immunity. 2019;51(5):840–55.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Macián F, García-Rodríguez C, Rao A. Gene expression elicited by NFAT in the presence or absence of cooperative recruitment of Fos and Jun. Embo J. 2000;19(17):4783–95.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Martinez GJ, Pereira RM, Äijö T, Kim EY, Marangoni F, Pipkin ME, et al. The transcription factor NFAT promotes exhaustion of activated CD8⁺ T cells. Immunity. 2015;42(2):265–78.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seo H, Chen J, González-Avalos E, Samaniego-Castruita D, Das A, Wang YH, et al. TOX and TOX2 transcription factors cooperate with NR4A transcription factors to impose CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell exhaustion. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(25):12410–5.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen J, López-Moyado IF, Seo H, Lio C-WJ, Hempleman LJ, Sekiya T, et al. NR4A transcription factors limit CAR T cell function in solid tumours. Nature. 2019;567(7749):530–4.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Good CR, Aznar MA, Kuramitsu S, Samareh P, Agarwal S, Donahue G, et al. An NK-like CAR T cell transition in CAR T cell dysfunction. Cell. 2021;184(25):6081–100.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
McCutcheon SR, Swartz AM, Brown MC, Barrera A, McRoberts Amador C, Siklenka K, et al. Orthogonal CRISPR screens to identify transcriptional and epigenetic regulators of human CD8 T cell function. bioRxiv. 2023.
Seo H, González-Avalos E, Zhang W, Ramchandani P, Yang C, Lio CJ, et al. BATF and IRF4 cooperate to counter exhaustion in tumor-infiltrating CAR T cells. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(8):983–95.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lollies A, Hartmann S, Schneider M, Bracht T, Weiß AL, Arnolds J, et al. An oncogenic axis of STAT-mediated BATF3 upregulation causing MYC activity in classical Hodgkin lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 2018;32(1):92–101.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nakagawa M, Shaffer AL 3rd, Ceribelli M, Zhang M, Wright G, Huang DW, et al. Targeting the HTLV-I-regulated BATF3/IRF4 transcriptional network in adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(2):286–97.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liang HC, Costanza M, Prutsch N, Zimmerman MW, Gurnhofer E, Montes-Mojarro IA, et al. Super-enhancer-based identification of a BATF3/IL-2R-module reveals vulnerabilities in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):5577.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jain N, Zhao Z, Feucht J, Koche R, Iyer A, Dobrin A, et al. TET2 guards against unchecked BATF3-induced CAR T cell expansion. Nature. 2023;615(7951):315–22.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Agarwalla P, Ogunnaike EA, Ahn S, Froehlich KA, Jansson A, Ligler FS, et al. Bioinstructive implantable scaffolds for rapid in vivo manufacture and release of CAR-T cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:1250–8.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Samur MK, Fulciniti M, Aktas Samur A, Bazarbachi AH, Tai YT, Prabhala R, et al. Biallelic loss of BCMA as a resistance mechanism to CAR T cell therapy in a patient with multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):868.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pont MJ, Hill T, Cole GO, Abbott JJ, Kelliher J, Salter AI, et al. γ-Secretase inhibition increases efficacy of BCMA-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2019;134(19):1585–97.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Morris EC, Neelapu SS, Giavridis T, Sadelain M. Cytokine release syndrome and associated neurotoxicity in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22(2):85–96.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jacobson CA, Hunter B, Armand P, Kamihara Y, Ritz J, Rodig SJ, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel in the real world: outcomes and predictors of response, resistance and toxicity. Blood. 2018;132:92.
Google Scholar
Teachey DT, Lacey SF, Shaw PA, Melenhorst JJ, Maude SL, Frey N, et al. Identification of predictive biomarkers for cytokine release syndrome after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(6):664–79.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yassine F, Iqbal M, Murthy H, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Chavez JC. Real world experience of approved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies outside of clinical trials. Curr Res Transl Med. 2020;68(4):159–70.
PubMed Google Scholar
Le RQ, Li L, Yuan W, Shord SS, Nie L, Habtemariam BA, et al. FDA approval summary: tocilizumab for treatment of chimeric antigen receptor T cell-induced severe or life-threatening cytokine release syndrome. Oncologist. 2018;23(8):943–7.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Norelli M, Camisa B, Barbiera G, Falcone L, Purevdorj A, Genua M, et al. Monocyte-derived IL-1 and IL-6 are differentially required for cytokine-release syndrome and neurotoxicity due to CAR T cells. Nat Med. 2018;24(6):739–48.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ahmed O. CAR-T-cell neurotoxicity: hope is on the horizon. Blood. 2019;133(20):2114–6.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Santomasso BD, Park JH, Salloum D, Riviere I, Flynn J, Mead E, et al. Clinical and biological correlates of neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(8):958–71.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Locke FL, Neelapu SS, Bartlett NL, Lekakis LJ, Jacobson CA, Braunschweig I, et al. Preliminary results of prophylactic tocilizumab after axicabtageneciloleucel (axi-cel; KTE-C19) treatment for patients with refractory, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Blood. 2017;130:1547.
Google Scholar
Gust J, Hay KA, Hanafi LA, Li D, Myerson D, Gonzalez-Cuyar LF, et al. Endothelial activation and blood-brain barrier disruption in neurotoxicity after adoptive immunotherapy with CD19 CAR-T cells. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(12):1404–19.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rossi J, Sherman J, Xue A, Wei-Shen Y, Navale L, Rosenberg S, et al., editors. Low-dose conditioning chemotherapy and anti-CD19 CAR T cells may elicit distinct immune programs associated with clinical responses. EMA Workshop Nov; 2016.
Sterner RM, Sakemura R, Cox MJ, Yang N, Khadka RH, Forsman CL, et al. GM-CSF inhibition reduces cytokine release syndrome and neuroinflammation but enhances CAR-T cell function in xenografts. Blood J Am Soc Hemat. 2019;133(7):697–709.
CAS Google Scholar
Sachdeva M, Duchateau P, Depil S, Poirot L, Valton J. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor inactivation in CAR T-cells prevents monocyte-dependent release of key cytokine release syndrome mediators. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(14):5430–7.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shah NN, Fry TJ. Mechanisms of resistance to CAR T cell therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(6):372–85.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Larson R, Maus MV. Recent advances and discoveries in the mechanisms and functions of CAR T cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21(3):145–61.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sommermeyer D, Hill T, Shamah SM, Salter AI, Chen Y, Mohler KM, et al. Fully human CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptors for T-cell therapy. Leukemia. 2017;31(10):2191–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hombach A, Hombach AA, Abken H. Adoptive immunotherapy with genetically engineered T cells: modification of the IgG1 Fc “spacer” domain in the extracellular moiety of chimeric antigen receptors avoids “off-target” activation and unintended initiation of an innate immune response. Gene Ther. 2010;17(10):1206–13.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jonnalagadda M, Mardiros A, Urak R, Wang X, Hoffman LJ, Bernanke A, et al. Chimeric antigen receptors with mutated IgG4 Fc spacer avoid fc receptor binding and improve T cell persistence and antitumor efficacy. Mol Ther. 2015;23(4):757–68.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sommer C, Boldajipour B, Kuo TC, Bentley T, Sutton J, Chen A, et al. Preclinical evaluation of allogeneic CAR T cells targeting BCMA for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Mol Ther. 2019;27(6):1126–38.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sommer C, Cheng HY, Nguyen D, Dettling D, Yeung YA, Sutton J, et al. Allogeneic FLT3 CAR T cells with an off-switch exhibit potent activity against AML and can be depleted to expedite bone marrow recovery. Mol Ther. 2020;28(10):2237–51.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Zhao H, Wei G, Ge W, et al. Genetically modified CD7-targeting allogeneic CAR-T cell therapy with enhanced efficacy for relapsed/refractory CD7-positive hematological malignancies: a phase I clinical study. Cell Res. 2022;32(11):995–1007.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brown CE, Rodriguez A, Palmer J, Ostberg JR, Naranjo A, Wagner JR, et al. Off-the-shelf, steroid-resistant, IL13Rα2-specific CAR T cells for treatment of glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24(8):1318–30.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Benjamin R, Jain N, Maus MV, Boissel N, Graham C, Jozwik A, et al. UCART19, a first-in-class allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (CALM): a phase 1, dose-escalation trial. Lancet Haematol. 2022;9(11):e833–43.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu E, Marin D, Banerjee P, Macapinlac HA, Thompson P, Basar R, et al. Use of CAR-transduced natural killer cells in CD19-positive lymphoid tumors. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(6):545–53.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bachanova V, Cayci Z, Lewis D, Maakaron JE, Janakiram M, Bartz A, et al. Initial clinical activity of FT596, a first-in-class, multi-antigen targeted, off-the-shelf, iPSC-derived CD19 CAR NK cell therapy in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2020;136:8.
Google Scholar
Wang J, Metheny L. Umbilical cord blood derived cellular therapy: advances in clinical development. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1167266.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nieto Y, Banerjee PP, Kaur I, Griffin L, Ganesh C, Kerbauy L, et al. Innate cell engager AFM13 combined with preactivated and expanded cord blood-derived NK cells for patients with double refractory CD30+ lymphoma. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):415–6.
Google Scholar
Li Y, Hermanson DL, Moriarity BS, Kaufman DS. Human iPSC-derived natural killer cells engineered with chimeric antigen receptors enhance anti-tumor activity. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(2):181–92.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lin X, Sun Y, Dong X, Liu Z, Sugimura R, Xie G. IPSC-derived CAR-NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;165:115123.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xu D-L, He Y-Q, Xiao B, Si Y, Shi J, Liu X-A, et al. A novel sushi-IL15-PD1 CAR-NK92 cell line with enhanced and PD-L1 targeted cytotoxicity against pancreatic cancer cells. Front Oncol. 2022;12:726985.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hasim MS, Marotel M, Hodgins JJ, Vulpis E, Makinson OJ, Asif S, et al. When killers become thieves: Trogocytosed PD-1 inhibits NK cells in cancer. Sci Adv. 2022;8(15):eabj3286.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Goodridge JP, Mahmood S, Zhu H, Gaidarova S, Blum R, Bjordahl R, et al. FT596: translation of first-of-kind multi-antigen targeted off-the-shelf CAR-NK cell with engineered persistence for the treatment of B cell malignancies. Blood. 2019;134:301.
Google Scholar
Bachanova V, Ghobadi A, Patel K, Park JH, Flinn IW, Shah P, et al. Safety and efficacy of FT596, a first-in-class, multi-antigen targeted, off-the-shelf, iPSC-derived CD19 CAR NK cell therapy in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2021;138:823.
Google Scholar
Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, Aplenc R, Barrett DM, Bunin NJ, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(16):1507–17.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Burger MC, Forster M-T, Romanski A, Strassheimer F, Macas J, Zeiner PS, et al. A phase I first-in-human trial with local application of CAR-NK cells targeting HER2 in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (CAR2BRAIN): results of the dose-escalation cohort. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2022;10(Suppl).
Miller JS, Soignier Y, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, McNearney SA, Yun GH, Fautsch SK, et al. Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer. Blood. 2005;105(8):3051–7.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tang X, Yang L, Li Z, Nalin AP, Dai H, Xu T, et al. First-in-man clinical trial of CAR NK-92 cells: safety test of CD33-CAR NK-92 cells in patients with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Cancer Res. 2018;8(6):1083.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shen S, Ferrell K, Chaudhry K, Vu A, Nordon R, O’Brien T. Modulation of anti-tumour activity of ex vivo expanded NK and GD2CAR-NK cells against neuroblastoma. Cytotherapy. 2019;21(5, Supplement):S20.
Google Scholar
Wang Z, Guo L, Song Y, Zhang Y, Lin D, Hu B, et al. Augmented anti-tumor activity of NK-92 cells expressing chimeric receptors of TGF-βR II and NKG2D. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017;66(4):537–48.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Niu L, Lou F, Sun Y, Sun L, Cai X, Liu Z, et al. A micropeptide encoded by lncRNA MIR155HG suppresses autoimmune inflammation via modulating antigen presentation. Sci Adv. 2020;6(21):eaaz2059.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu E, Tong Y, Dotti G, Shaim H, Savoldo B, Mukherjee M, et al. Cord blood NK cells engineered to express IL-15 and a CD19-targeted CAR show long-term persistence and potent antitumor activity. Leukemia. 2018;32(2):520–31.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Felices M, Lenvik AJ, McElmurry R, Chu S, Hinderlie P, Bendzick L, et al. Continuous treatment with IL-15 exhausts human NK cells via a metabolic defect. JCI Insight. 2018;3(3):e96219.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Müller N, Michen S, Tietze S, Töpfer K, Schulte A, Lamszus K, et al. Engineering NK cells modified with an EGFRvIII-specific chimeric antigen receptor to overexpress CXCR4 improves immunotherapy of CXCL12/SDF-1α-secreting Glioblastoma. J Immunother (Hagerstown, Md : 1997). 2015;38(5):197–210.
Google Scholar
Ng YY, Tay JCK, Wang S. CXCR1 expression to improve anti-cancer efficacy of intravenously injected CAR-NK cells in mice with peritoneal xenografts. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;16:75–85.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ma R, Lu T, Li Z, Teng KY, Mansour AG, Yu M, et al. An oncolytic virus expressing IL15/IL15Rα combined with off-the-shelf EGFR-CAR NK cells targets glioblastoma. Can Res. 2021;81(13):3635–48.
CAS Google Scholar
Han J, Chu J, Keung Chan W, Zhang J, Wang Y, Cohen JB, et al. CAR-engineered NK cells targeting wild-type EGFR and EGFRvIII enhance killing of glioblastoma and patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11483.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang C, Burger M, Jennewein L, Genßler S, Schönfeld K, Zeiner P, et al. ErbB2/HER2-specific NK cells for targeted therapy of glioblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(5):djv375.
Google Scholar
Heipertz EL, Zynda ER, Stav-Noraas TE, Hungler AD, Boucher SE, Kaur N, et al. Current perspectives on “Off-The-Shelf” allogeneic NK and CAR-NK cell therapies. Front Immunol. 2021;12:732135.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Herrera L, Santos S, Vesga MA, Anguita J, Martin-Ruiz I, Carrascosa T, et al. Adult peripheral blood and umbilical cord blood NK cells are good sources for effective CAR therapy against CD19 positive leukemic cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):18729.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gunesch JT, Angelo LS, Mahapatra S, Deering RP, Kowalko JE, Sleiman P, et al. Genome-wide analyses and functional profiling of human NK cell lines. Mol Immunol. 2019;115:64–75.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen X, Allan DSJ, Krzewski K, Ge B, Kopcow H, Strominger JL. CD28-stimulated ERK2 phosphorylation is required for polarization of the microtubule organizing center and granules in YTS NK cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(27):10346–51.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fujisaki H, Kakuda H, Shimasaki N, Imai C, Ma J, Lockey T, et al. Expansion of highly cytotoxic human natural killer cells for cancer cell therapy. Can Res. 2009;69(9):4010–7.
CAS Google Scholar
Marvel J, Walzer T. CD137 in NK cells. Blood. 2010;115(15):2987–8.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Baessler T, Charton JE, Schmiedel BJ, Grunebach F, Krusch M, Wacker A, et al. CD137 ligand mediates opposite effects in human and mouse NK cells and impairs NK-cell reactivity against human acute myeloid leukemia cells. Blood. 2010;115(15):3058–69.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ao X, Yang Y, Li W, Tan Y, Guo W, Ao L, et al. Anti-αFR CAR-engineered NK-92 cells display potent cytotoxicity against αFR-positive ovarian cancer. J Immunother (Hagerstown, Md : 1997). 2019;42(8):284–96.
CAS Google Scholar
Topfer K, Cartellieri M, Michen S, Wiedemuth R, Muller N, Lindemann D, et al. DAP12-based activating chimeric antigen receptor for NK cell tumor immunotherapy. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2015;194(7):3201–12.
Google Scholar
Allan DSJ, Chakraborty M, Waller GC, Hochman MJ, Poolcharoen A, Reger RN, et al. Systematic improvements in lentiviral transduction of primary human natural killer cells undergoing ex vivo expansion. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2021;20:559–71.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gong Y, Klein Wolterink RGJ, Janssen I, Groot AJ, Bos GMJ, Germeraad WTV. Rosuvastatin enhances VSV-G lentiviral transduction of NK cells via upregulation of the low-density lipoprotein receptor. Molecular therapy Methods & clinical development. 2020;17:634–46.
CAS Google Scholar
Bushman FD. Retroviral insertional mutagenesis in humans: evidence for four genetic mechanisms promoting expansion of cell clones. Mol Ther. 2020;28(2):352–6.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xiao L, Cen D, Gan H, Sun Y, Huang N, Xiong H, et al. Adoptive transfer of NKG2D CAR mRNA-engineered natural killer cells in colorectal cancer patients. Mol Ther. 2019;27(6):1114–25.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mark C, Czerwinski T, Roessner S, Mainka A, Hörsch F, Heublein L, et al. Cryopreservation impairs 3-D migration and cytotoxicity of natural killer cells. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5224.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay M. Macrophages enter CAR immunotherapy. Nat Methods. 2020;17(6):561.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jutras I, Desjardins M. Phagocytosis: at the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:511–27.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mills C. M1 and M2 macrophages: oracles of health and disease. Crit Rev™ Immunol. 2012;32(6):463–88.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
DeNardo DG, Ruffell B. Macrophages as regulators of tumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19(6):369–82.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rhee I. Diverse macrophages polarization in tumor microenvironment. Arch Pharm Res. 2016;39(11):1588–96.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(3):787–95.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mantovani A, Marchesi F, Malesci A, Laghi L, Allavena P. Tumour-associated macrophages as treatment targets in oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(7):399–416.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wolf GL. Macrophages hold the key to cancer’s inner sanctum. Med Hypotheses. 2019;122:111–4.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
van Ravenswaay Claasen H, Kluin PM, Fleuren G. Tumor infiltrating cells in human cancer. On the possible role of CD16+ macrophages in antitumor cytotoxicity. Lab Invest J Tech Methods Pathol. 1992;67(2):166–74.
Google Scholar
Alvey CM, Spinler KR, Irianto J, Pfeifer CR, Hayes B, Xia Y, et al. SIRPA-inhibited, marrow-derived macrophages engorge, accumulate, and differentiate in antibody-targeted regression of solid tumors. Curr Biol. 2017;27(14):2065–77.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Villanueva MT. Macrophages get a CAR. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(5):273.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Morrissey MA, Williamson AP, Steinbach AM, Roberts EW, Kern N, Headley MB, et al. Chimeric antigen receptors that trigger phagocytosis. Elife. 2018;7:e36688.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Klichinsky M, Ruella M, Shestova O, Lu XM, Best A, Zeeman M, et al. Human chimeric antigen receptor macrophages for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(8):947–53.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang W, Liu L, Su H, Liu Q, Shen J, Dai H, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor macrophage therapy for breast tumours mediated by targeting the tumour extracellular matrix. Br J Cancer. 2019;121(10):837–45.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang L, Tian L, Dai X, Yu H, Wang J, Lei A, et al. Pluripotent stem cell-derived CAR-macrophage cells with antigen-dependent anti-cancer cell functions. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):153.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dey T. Tumor-macrophage crosstalk: how to listen. Integr Biol. 2020;12(12):291–302.
Google Scholar
Pyonteck SM, Akkari L, Schuhmacher AJ, Bowman RL, Sevenich L, Quail DF, et al. CSF-1R inhibition alters macrophage polarization and blocks glioma progression. Nat Med. 2013;19(10):1264–72.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu Y, Knolhoff BL, Meyer MA, Nywening TM, West BL, Luo J, et al. CSF1/CSF1R blockade reprograms tumor-infiltrating macrophages and improves response to T-cell checkpoint immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer models. Can Res. 2014;74(18):5057–69.
CAS Google Scholar
Kang M, Lee SH, Kwon M, Byun J, Kim D, Kim C, et al. Nanocomplex-mediated in vivo programming to chimeric antigen receptor-M1 macrophages for cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33(43):e2103258.
PubMed Google Scholar
Kang M, Lee SH, Kwon M, Byun J, Kim D, Kim C, et al. Nanocomplex-mediated in vivo programming to chimeric antigen receptor-M1 macrophages for cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33(43):2103258.
CAS Google Scholar
Klichinsky M, Ruella M, Shestova O, Lu X, Best A, Zeeman M, et al. Human chimeric antigen receptor macrophages for cancer immunotherapy. Integr Biol. 2020;38(8):947–53.
CAS Google Scholar
Niu Z, Chen G, Chang W, Sun P, Luo Z, Zhang H, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified macrophages trigger systemic anti-tumour immunity. J Pathol. 2021;253(3):247–57.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gentles AJ, Newman AM, Liu CL, Bratman SV, Feng W, Kim D, et al. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):938–45.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu Y, Xiang Z, Alnaggar M, Kouakanou L, Li J, He J, et al. Allogeneic Vgamma9Vdelta2 T-cell immunotherapy exhibits promising clinical safety and prolongs the survival of patients with late-stage lung or liver cancer. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(2):427–39.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rischer M, Pscherer S, Duwe S, Vormoor J, Jurgens H, Rossig C. Human gammadelta T cells as mediators of chimaeric-receptor redirected anti-tumour immunity. Br J Haematol. 2004;126(4):583–92.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Silva-Santos B, Mensurado S, Coffelt SB. γδ T cells: pleiotropic immune effectors with therapeutic potential in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(7):392–404.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Capsomidis A, Benthall G, Van Acker HH, Fisher J, Kramer AM, Abeln Z, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered human gamma delta T cells: enhanced cytotoxicity with retention of cross presentation. Mol Ther. 2018;26(2):354–65.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Scheper W, Sebestyen Z, Kuball J. Cancer immunotherapy using γδT cells: dealing with diversity. Front Immunol. 2014;5:601.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Siegers GM, Dutta I, Lai R, Postovit LM. Functional plasticity of gamma delta T cells and breast tumor targets in hypoxia. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1367.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lo Presti E, Pizzolato G, Corsale AM, Caccamo N, Sireci G, Dieli F, et al. γδ T cells and tumor microenvironment: from immunosurveillance to tumor evasion. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1395.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Märten A, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Büchler MW, Schmidt J. Soluble MIC is elevated in the serum of patients with pancreatic carcinoma diminishing gammadelta T cell cytotoxicity. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(10):2359–65.
PubMed Google Scholar
Deng J, Yin H. Gamma delta (γδ) T cells in cancer immunotherapy; where it comes from, where it will go? Eur J Pharmacol. 2022;919:174803.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nishimoto KP, Barca T, Azameera A, Makkouk A, Romero JM, Bai L, et al. Allogeneic CD20-targeted gammadelta T cells exhibit innate and adaptive antitumor activities in preclinical B-cell lymphoma models. Clin Transl Immunol. 2022;11(2):e1373.
CAS Google Scholar
Neelapu SS, Hamadani M, Stevens D, Hayes SM, Galimi F, Miklos DB. A phase 1 safety and efficacy study of ADI-001 anti-CD20 CAR-engineered allogeneic gamma delta (γδ) T cells in adults with B cell malignancies, in monotherapy and combination with IL-2. Blood. 2021;138:2834.
Google Scholar
Neelapu SS, Stevens DA, Hamadani M, Frank MJ, Holmes H, Jacobovits A, et al. A phase 1 study of ADI-001: anti-CD20 CAR-engineered allogeneic gamma Delta1 (γδ) T cells in adults with B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):4617–9.
Google Scholar
Mirzaei HR, Mirzaei H, Lee SY, Hadjati J, Till BG. Prospects for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) γδ T cells: A potential game changer for adoptive T cell cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2016;380(2):413–23.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lopez RD, Xu S, Guo B, Negrin RS, Waller EK. CD2-mediated IL-12–dependent signals render human γδ-T cells resistant to mitogen-induced apoptosis, permitting the large-scale ex vivo expansion of functionally distinct lymphocytes: implications for the development of adoptive immunotherapy strategies. Blood. 2000;96(12):3827–37.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Siegers GM, Ribot EJ, Keating A, Foster PJ. Extensive expansion of primary human gamma delta T cells generates cytotoxic effector memory cells that can be labeled with Feraheme for cellular MRI. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62(3):571–83.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Deniger DC, Switzer K, Mi T, Maiti S, Hurton L, Singh H, et al. Bispecific T-cells expressing polyclonal repertoire of endogenous gammadelta T-cell receptors and introduced CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor. Mol Ther. 2013;21(3):638–47.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fisher J, Abramowski P, Wisidagamage Don ND, Flutter B, Capsomidis A, Cheung GW, et al. Avoidance of on-target off-tumor activation using a co-stimulation-only chimeric antigen receptor. Mol Ther. 2017;25(5):1234–47.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Raffaghello L, Prigione I, Airoldi I, Camoriano M, Levreri I, Gambini C, et al. Downregulation and/or release of NKG2D ligands as immune evasion strategy of human neuroblastoma. Neoplasia. 2004;6(5):558–68.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fisher J, Sharma R, Don DW, Barisa M, Hurtado MO, Abramowski P, et al. Engineering γδT cells limits tonic signaling associated with chimeric antigen receptors. Sci Signal. 2019;12(598):eaax1872.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yazdanifar M, Zhou R, Mukherjee P. Emerging immunotherapeutics in adenocarcinomas: a focus on CAR-T cells. Curr Trends Immunol. 2016;17:95–115.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ribot J, Debarros A, Mancio-Silva L, Pamplona A, Silva-Santos B. B7-CD28 costimulatory signals control the survival and proliferation of murine and human γδ T cells via IL-2 production. J Immunol. 2012;189(3):1202–8.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lee SJ, Kim YH, Hwang SH, Kim YI, Han IS, Vinay DS, et al. 4–1 BB signal stimulates the activation, expansion, and effector functions of γδ T cells in mice and humans. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43(7):1839–48.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ribot JC, Debarros A, Silva-Santos B. Searching for “signal 2”: costimulation requirements of gammadelta T cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68(14):2345–55.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
deBarros A, Chaves-Ferreira M, d’Orey F, Ribot JC, Silva-Santos B. CD70–CD27 interactions provide survival and proliferative signals that regulate T cell receptor-driven activation of human γδ peripheral blood lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41(1):195–201.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Middendorp S, Nieuwenhuis E. NKT cells in mucosal immunity. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2(5):393–402.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Motohashi S, Ishikawa A, Ishikawa E, Otsuji M, Iizasa T, Hanaoka H, et al. A phase I study of in vitro expanded natural killer T cells in patients with advanced and recurrent non–small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(20):6079–86.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kunii N, Horiguchi S, Motohashi S, Yamamoto H, Ueno N, Yamamoto S, et al. Combination therapy of in vitro-expanded natural killer T cells and α-galactosylceramide-pulsed antigen-presenting cells in patients with recurrent head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2009;100(6):1092–8.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Exley MA, Friedlander P, Alatrakchi N, Vriend L, Yue S, Sasada T, et al. Adoptive transfer of invariant NKT cells as immunotherapy for advanced melanoma: a phase I clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(14):3510–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Heczey A, Liu D, Tian G, Courtney AN, Wei J, Marinova E, et al. Invariant NKT cells with chimeric antigen receptor provide a novel platform for safe and effective cancer immunotherapy. Blood. 2014;124(18):2824–33.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tian G, Courtney AN, Jena B, Heczey A, Liu D, Marinova E, et al. CD62L+ NKT cells have prolonged persistence and antitumor activity in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(6):2341–55.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rotolo A, Caputo VS, Holubova M, Baxan N, Dubois O, Chaudhry MS, et al. Enhanced anti-lymphoma activity of CAR19-iNKT cells underpinned by dual CD19 and CD1d targeting. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(4):596–610.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Simon B, Wiesinger M, Marz J, Wistuba-Hamprecht K, Weide B, Schuler-Thurner B, et al. The generation of CAR-transfected natural killer T cells for the immunotherapy of melanoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(8):2365.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Athenex I. Athenex Presents Interim Data from Phase 1 ANCHOR Study of KUR-502 (Allogeneic CD19 CAR-NKT Cells) in Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma and Leukemia at the 2022 Transplantation & Cellular (“Tandem”) Meetings of ASTCT and CIBMTR. 2022.
Ramos CA, Courtney AN, Robinson SN, Dakhova O, Lulla PD, Kamble R, et al. Allogeneic NKT cells expressing a CD19-specific CAR in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: an interim analysis. Blood. 2021;138:2819.
Google Scholar
Heczey A, Courtney AN, Montalbano A, Robinson S, Liu K, Li M, et al. Anti-GD2 CAR-NKT cells in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: an interim analysis. Nat Med. 2020;26(11):1686–90.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhu Y, Smith DJ, Zhou Y, Li YR, Yu J, Lee D, et al. Development of hematopoietic stem cell-engineered invariant natural killer T cell therapy for cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25(4):542–57.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yamada D, Iyoda T, Vizcardo R, Shimizu K, Sato Y, Endo TA, et al. Efficient regeneration of human Valpha24(+) invariant natural killer T cells and their anti-tumor activity in vivo. Stem Cells. 2016;34(12):2852–60.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tsujimoto H, Osafune K. Current status and future directions of clinical applications using iPS cells-focus on Japan. FEBS J. 2021;289:7274–91.
PubMed Google Scholar
Liu D, Song L, Wei J, Courtney AN, Gao X, Marinova E, et al. IL-15 protects NKT cells from inhibition by tumor-associated macrophages and enhances antimetastatic activity. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(6):2221–33.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ngai H, Tian G, Courtney AN, Ravari SB, Guo L, Liu B, et al. IL-21 selectively protects CD62L(+) NKT cells and enhances their effector functions for adoptive immunotherapy. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2018;201(7):2141–53.
CAS Google Scholar
Baum C, Schambach A, Bohne J, Galla M. Retrovirus vectors: Toward the plentivirus? Mol Ther. 2006;13(6):1050–63.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brentjens R, Latouche J, Santos E, Marti F, Gong M, Lyddane C, et al. Eradication of systemic B-cell tumors by genetically targeted human T lymphocytes co-stimulated by CD80 and interleukin-15. Nat Med. 2003;9(3):279–86.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Davila ML, Riviere I, Wang X, Bartido S, Park J, Curran K, et al. Efficacy and toxicity management of 19–28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(224):224ra25.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lewinski MK, Bushman FD. Retroviral DNA integration–mechanism and consequences. Adv Genet. 2005;55:147–81.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Howe S, Mansour M, Schwarzwaelder K, Bartholomae C, Hubank M, Kempski H, et al. Insertional mutagenesis combined with acquired somatic mutations causes leukemogenesis following gene therapy of SCID-X1 patients. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(9):3143–50.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Newrzela S, Cornils K, Li Z, Baum C, Brugman MH, Hartmann M, et al. Resistance of mature T cells to oncogene transformation. Blood. 2008;112(6):2278–86.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Scholler J, Brady T, Binder-Scholl G, Hwang W, Plesa G, Hege K, et al. Decade-long safety and function of retroviral-modified chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(132):132ra53.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shao L, Shi R, Zhao Y, Liu H, Lu A, Ma J, et al. Genome-wide profiling of retroviral DNA integration and its effect on clinical pre-infusion CAR T-cell products. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):514.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vormittag P, Gunn R, Ghorashian S, Veraitch FS. A guide to manufacturing CAR T cell therapies. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018;53:164–81.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Poorebrahim M, Sadeghi S, Fakhr E, Abazari MF, Poortahmasebi V, Kheirollahi A, et al. Production of CAR T-cells by GMP-grade lentiviral vectors: latest advances and future prospects. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019;56(6):393–419.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
David RM, Doherty AT. Viral vectors: the road to reducing genotoxicity. Toxicol Sci. 2017;155(2):315–25.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ciuffi A. Mechanisms governing lentivirus integration site selection. Curr Gene Ther. 2008;8(6):419–29.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Milone MC, O’Doherty U. Clinical use of lentiviral vectors. Leukemia. 2018;32(7):1529–41.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang X, Popplewell L, Wagner J, Naranjo A, Blanchard M, Mott M, et al. Phase 1 studies of central memory-derived CD19 CAR T-cell therapy following autologous HSCT in patients with B-cell NHL. Blood J Am Soc Hematol. 2016;127(24):2980–90.
CAS Google Scholar
Shah NN, Qin H, Yates B, Su L, Shalabi H, Raffeld M, et al. Clonal expansion of CAR T cells harboring lentivector integration in the CBL gene following anti-CD22 CAR T-cell therapy. Blood Adv. 2019;3(15):2317–22.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Throm RE, Ouma AA, Zhou S, Chandrasekaran A, Lockey T, Greene M, et al. Efficient construction of producer cell lines for a SIN lentiviral vector for SCID-X1 gene therapy by concatemeric array transfection. Blood. 2009;113(21):5104–10.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen YH, Keiser MS, Davidson BL. Viral vectors for gene transfer. Curr Protocols Mouse Biol. 2018;8(4):e58.
Google Scholar
Woodard LE, Wilson MH. piggyBac-ing models and new therapeutic strategies. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(9):525–33.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Izsvák Z, Hackett PB, Cooper LJ, Ivics Z. Translating Sleeping Beauty transposition into cellular therapies: victories and challenges. BioEssays. 2010;32(9):756–67.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Magnani CF, Tettamanti S, Alberti G, Pisani I, Biondi A, Serafini M, et al. Transposon-based CAR T cells in acute leukemias: Where are we going? Cells. 2020;9(6):1337.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hou X, Du Y, Deng Y, Wu J, Cao G. Sleeping beauty transposon system for genetic etiological research and gene therapy of cancers. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(1):8–16.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Doherty JE, Huye LE, Yusa K, Zhou L, Craig NL, Wilson MH. Hyperactive piggyBac gene transfer in human cells and in vivo. Hum Gene Ther. 2012;23(3):311–20.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sato M, Inada E, Saitoh I, Watanabe S, Nakamura S. piggyBac-based non-viral in vivo gene delivery useful for production of genetically modified animals and organs. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(3):277.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Singh H, Huls H, Kebriaei P, Cooper LJ. A new approach to gene therapy using sleeping beauty to genetically modify clinical-grade T cells to target CD19. Immunol Rev. 2014;257(1):181–90.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jin Z, Maiti S, Huls H, Singh H, Olivares S, Mátés L, et al. The hyperactive sleeping beauty transposase SB100X improves the genetic modification of T cells to express a chimeric antigen receptor. Gene Ther. 2011;18(9):849–56.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kacherovsky N, Liu GW, Jensen MC, Pun SH. Multiplexed gene transfer to a human T-cell line by combining Sleeping Beauty transposon system with methotrexate selection. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112(7):1429–36.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Deniger DC, Pasetto A, Tran E, Parkhurst MR, Cohen CJ, Robbins PF, et al. Stable, nonviral expression of mutated tumor neoantigen-specific T-cell receptors using the sleeping beauty transposon/transposase system. Mol Ther. 2016;24(6):1078–89.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nakazawa Y, Saha S, Galvan DL, Huye L, Rollins L, Rooney CM, et al. Evaluation of long-term transgene expression in piggyBac-modified human T lymphocytes. J Immunother. 2013;36(1):3–10.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kubo H, Yagyu S, Nakamura K, Yamashima K, Tomida A, Kikuchi K, et al. Development of non-viral, ligand-dependent, EPHB4-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells for treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2021;20:646–58.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gregory T, Cohen AD, Costello CL, Ali SA, Berdeja JG, Ostertag EM, et al. Efficacy and safety of P-Bcma-101 CAR-T cells in patients with relapsed/Refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma (MM). Blood. 2018;132(Supplement 1):1012.
Google Scholar
Galvan DL, Nakazawa Y, Kaja A, Kettlun C, Cooper LJ, Rooney CM, et al. Genome-wide mapping of PiggyBac transposon integrations in primary human T cells. J Immunother (Hagerstown, Md: 1997). 2009;32(8):837–44.
CAS Google Scholar
Piscopo NJ, Mueller KP, Das A, Hematti P, Murphy WL, Palecek SP, et al. Bioengineering solutions for manufacturing challenges in CAR T cells. Biotechnol J. 2018;13(2):1700095.
Google Scholar
Ivics Z, Izsvák Z. Nonviral gene delivery with the sleeping beauty transposon system. Hum Gene Ther. 2011;22(9):1043–51.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tavernier G, Andries O, Demeester J, Sanders NN, De Smedt SC, Rejman J. mRNA as gene therapeutic: how to control protein expression. J Control Release. 2011;150(3):238–47.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Beatty GL, Haas AR, Maus MV, Torigian DA, Soulen MC, Plesa G, et al. Mesothelin-specific chimeric antigen receptor mRNA-engineered T cells induce anti-tumor activity in solid malignancies. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(2):112–20.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huang R, Li X, He Y, Zhu W, Gao L, Liu Y, et al. Recent advances in CAR-T cell engineering. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):86.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krug C, Wiesinger M, Abken H, Schuler-Thurner B, Schuler G, Dörrie J, et al. A GMP-compliant protocol to expand and transfect cancer patient T cells with mRNA encoding a tumor-specific chimeric antigen receptor. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014;63(10):999–1008.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Billingsley MM, Singh N, Ravikumar P, Zhang R, June CH, Mitchell MJ. Ionizable lipid nanoparticle-mediated mRNA delivery for human CAR T cell engineering. Nano Lett. 2020;20(3):1578–89.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Billingsley MM, Hamilton AG, Mai D, Patel SK, Swingle KL, Sheppard NC, et al. Orthogonal design of experiments for optimization of lipid nanoparticles for mRNA engineering of CAR T cells. Nano Lett. 2022;22(1):533–42.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Si K, Dai Z, Li Z, Ye Z, Ding B, Feng S, et al. Engineered exosome-mediated messenger RNA and single-chain variable fragment delivery for human chimeric antigen receptor T-cell engineering. Cytotherapy. 2023;25:615–24.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang B, Chen Y, Shi J. Exosome biochemistry and advanced nanotechnology for next-generation theranostic platforms. Adv Mater. 2019;31(2):1802896.
Google Scholar
Bozza M, De Roia A, Correia MP, Berger A, Tuch A, Schmidt A, et al. A nonviral, nonintegrating DNA nanovector platform for the safe, rapid, and persistent manufacture of recombinant T cells. Sci Adv. 2021;7(16):eabf1333.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ran T, Eichmüller SB, Schmidt P, Schlander M. Cost of decentralized CAR T-cell production in an academic nonprofit setting. Int J Cancer. 2020;147(12):3438–45.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Smith TT, Stephan SB, Moffett HF, McKnight LE, Ji W, Reiman D, et al. In situ programming of leukaemia-specific T cells using synthetic DNA nanocarriers. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12(8):813–20.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sakuma T, Barry MA, Ikeda Y. Lentiviral vectors: basic to translational. Biochem J. 2012;443(3):603–18.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Craigie R, Bushman FD. Host factors in retroviral integration and the selection of integration target sites. Microbiol Spectr. 2014;2(6):1035–50.
Google Scholar
Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Zhang F. Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;37:67–78.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang H, Qin C, An C, Zheng X, Wen S, Chen W, et al. Application of the CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing technique in basic research, diagnosis, and therapy of cancer. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):126.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu X, Zhang Y, Cheng C, Cheng AW, Zhang X, Li N, et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated multiplex gene editing in CAR-T cells. Cell Res. 2017;27(1):154–7.
PubMed Google Scholar
Lin H, Cheng J, Mu W, Zhou J, Zhu L. Advances in universal CAR-T cell therapy. Front Immunol. 2021;12:744823.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang Y, Zhang X, Cheng C, Mu W, Liu X, Li N, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated LAG-3 disruption in CAR-T cells. Front Med. 2017;11(4):554–62.
PubMed Google Scholar
Legut M, Dolton G, Mian AA, Ottmann OG, Sewell AK. CRISPR-mediated TCR replacement generates superior anticancer transgenic T cells. Blood. 2018;131(3):311–22.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
He X, Tan C, Wang F, Wang Y, Zhou R, Cui D, et al. Knock-in of large reporter genes in human cells via CRISPR/Cas9-induced homology-dependent and independent DNA repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(9):e85.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cox DB, Platt RJ, Zhang F. Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges. Nat Med. 2015;21(2):121–31.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schaefer KA, Wu WH, Colgan DF, Tsang SH, Bassuk AG, Mahajan VB. Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo. Nat Methods. 2017;14(6):547–8.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cho SW, Kim S, Kim Y, Kweon J, Kim HS, Bae S, et al. Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases. Genome Res. 2014;24(1):132–41.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Webber BR, Lonetree CL, Kluesner MG, Johnson MJ, Pomeroy EJ, Diers MD, et al. Highly efficient multiplex human T cell engineering without double-strand breaks using Cas9 base editors. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5222.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qasim W, Zhan H, Samarasinghe S, Adams S, Amrolia P, Stafford S, et al. Molecular remission of infant B-ALL after infusion of universal TALEN gene-edited CAR T cells. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(374):eaaj2013.
PubMed Google Scholar
Jo S, Das S, Williams A, Chretien AS, Pagliardini T, Le Roy A, et al. Endowing universal CAR T-cell with immune-evasive properties using TALEN-gene editing. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3453.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jain S, Shukla S, Yang C, Zhang M, Fatma Z, Lingamaneni M, et al. TALEN outperforms Cas9 in editing heterochromatin target sites. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):606.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Doyon Y, Vo TD, Mendel MC, Greenberg SG, Wang J, Xia DF, et al. Enhancing zinc-finger-nuclease activity with improved obligate heterodimeric architectures. Nat Methods. 2011;8(1):74–9.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Torikai H, Reik A, Liu PQ, Zhou Y, Zhang L, Maiti S, et al. A foundation for universal T-cell based immunotherapy: T cells engineered to express a CD19-specific chimeric-antigen-receptor and eliminate expression of endogenous TCR. Blood. 2012;119(24):5697–705.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Torikai H, Reik A, Soldner F, Warren EH, Yuen C, Zhou Y, et al. Toward eliminating HLA class I expression to generate universal cells from allogeneic donors. Blood. 2013;122(8):1341–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bansal R, Reshef R. Revving the CAR—combination strategies to enhance CAR T cell effectiveness. Blood Rev. 2021;45:100695.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rafiq S, Hackett CS, Brentjens RJ. Engineering strategies to overcome the current roadblocks in CAR T cell therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(3):147–67.
PubMed Google Scholar
Kyrysyuk O, Wucherpfennig KW. Designing cancer immunotherapies that engage T cells and NK Cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2023;41:17–38.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bachiller M, Perez-Amill L, Battram AM, Carne SC, Najjar A, Verhoeyen E, et al. NK cells enhance CAR-T cell antitumor efficacy by enhancing immune/tumor cells cluster formation and improving CAR-T cell fitness. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(8):e002866.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li G, Wu X, Chan IH, Trager JB. Abstract 4235: A combination of CAR-NK and CAR-T cells results in rapid and persistent anti-tumor efficacy while reducing CAR-T cell mediated cytokine release and T-cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 2020;80(16_Supplement):4235.
Google Scholar
Liu M, Liu J, Liang Z, Dai K, Gan J, Wang Q, et al. CAR-macrophages and CAR-T cells synergistically kill tumor cells in vitro. Cells. 2022;11(22):3692.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0906100) to X. Wan, Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023A1515030028) to G. Zhang, and Shenzhen Basic Science Research Project (JCYJ20220818100806015) to G. Zhang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Center for Protein and Cell-based Drugs, Institute of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, 518055, People’s Republic of China
Pengchao Zhang, Guizhong Zhang & Xiaochun Wan
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People’s Republic of China
Pengchao Zhang

Authors

Pengchao Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Guizhong Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiaochun Wan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GZ conceptualized the review. PZ completed the literature search, diagrams and figures preparation, and manuscript writing. GZ revised the manuscript. XW provided advices and supervised this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guizhong Zhang or Xiaochun Wan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to publish this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Clinical trials of ACTs for cancer

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, P., Zhang, G. & Wan, X. Challenges and new technologies in adoptive cell therapy. J Hematol Oncol 16, 97 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-023-01492-8

Download citation

Received: 29 May 2023
Accepted: 04 August 2023
Published: 18 August 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-023-01492-8

Challenges and new technologies in adoptive cell therapy

Abstract

Introduction

ACTs

TIL: founder of ACT

Advantages

Research progress

Challenges and potential solutions

TCR-T: a sharp sword against solid tumors

Advantages

Research progress

Challenges and potential solutions

CAR-T: great success, but many challenges remain

Structure of CAR

Development of CAR

Research progress

Challenges and potential solutions

CAR-NK: powerful innate anti-tumor activity

Advantages

Research progress

Challenges and potential solutions

CAR-macrophage: future nemesis of solid tumors

Advantages

Research progress

Challenges and potential solutions

CAR-γδT: a promising candidate for allogeneic cell therapy

Advantages

Research progress

Challenges and potential solutions

CAR-NKT: new treatment options for solid tumors

Advantages

Research progress

Challenges and potential solutions

Gene transduction strategies in ACT

Viral vectors

γ-retrovirus

Lentivirus

Other viral vectors

Non-viral vectors

Transposon

mRNA transduction

DNA transduction

Gene editing tools

CRISPR/Cas9

TALEN

ZFN

Conclusion and perspectives

Availability of data and materials

Abbreviations

References

Acknowledgements

Funding

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding authors

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

Keywords

Journal of Hematology & Oncology

Contact us