Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Molecular mechanism of the schedule-dependent synergistic interaction in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer cell lines treated with paclitaxel and gefitinib

  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Journal of Hematology & Oncology20114:5

  • Received: 14 October 2010
  • Accepted: 21 January 2011
  • Published:



Chemotherapy combined concurrently with TKIs produced a negative interaction and failed to improve survival when compared with chemotherapy or TKIs alone in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study investigated the sequence-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and gefitinib and clarified the underlying mechanism.


The effects on cell proliferation, EGFR signaling pathway, and TGFα expression were evaluated in a panel of human NSCLC cell lines harboring EGFR mutations with three different combination sequences: sequential treatment with paclitaxel followed by gefitinib (T→G), sequential treatment with gefitinib followed by paclitaxel (G→T), or concomitant treatment (T + G).


The sequence-dependent anti-proliferative effects differed between EGFR-TKI-sensitive and -resistant cell lines carrying EGFR mutations. A synergistic anti-proliferative activity was obtained with paclitaxel treatment followed by gefitinib in all cell lines, with mean CI values of 0.63 in Hcc827, 0.54 in PC-9, 0.81 in PC-9/GR, and 0.77 in H1650 cells for the T→G sequence. The mean CI values for the G→T sequence were 1.29 in Hcc827, 1.16 in PC-9, 1.52 in PC-9/GR, and 1.5 in H1650 cells. The mean CI values for T+G concomitant treatment were 0.88 in Hcc827, 0.91 in PC-9, 1.05 in PC-9/GR, and 1.18 in H1650 cells. Paclitaxel produced a dose-dependent increase in EGFR phosphorylation. Paclitaxel significantly increased EGFR phosphorylation compared with that in untreated controls (mean differences: +50% in Hcc827, + 56% in PC-9, + 39% in PC-9/GR, and + 69% in H1650 cells; p < 0.05). The T→G sequence produced significantly greater inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation compared with the opposite sequence (mean differences: -58% in Hcc827, -38% in PC-9, -35% in PC-9/GR, and -30% in H1650 cells; p < 0.05). Addition of a neutralizing anti-TGFα antibody abolished paclitaxel-induced activation of the EGFR pathway in PC-9 and H1650 cells. Sequence-dependent TGFα expression and release are responsible for the sequence-dependent EGFR pathway modulation.


The data suggest that the sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib is an appropriate treatment combination for NSCLC cell lines harboring EGFR mutations. Our results provide molecular evidence to support clinical treatment strategies for patients with lung cancer.


  • Paclitaxel
  • Gefitinib
  • Erlotinib
  • H1650 Cell
  • Combination Index


Despite recent advances in early diagnosis and treatment, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still a disease with a poor prognosis. Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced NSCLC with good performance status [1, 2]. Current data suggest that NSCLC chemotherapy has reached a therapeutic plateau [3, 4].

Gefitinib and erlotinib are orally active, reversible Her-1/epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). In 2004, researchers found that EGFR-activating mutations correlated with clinical responses [57]. The Iressa Pan-Asia Study (IPASS) trial indicated that gefitinib was superior to carboplatin plus paclitaxel as an initial treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring an EGFR mutation [8]. The finding was further supported by two randomized studies (the WJTOG3405 and NEJ 002 trials) that consistently reported a high tumor response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with an EGFR mutation [9, 10]. The EGFR mutation rate was higher in Asian than in western patients, explaining the higher response rate in East Asian patients [11]. Based on these studies, an EGFR mutation is currently the only established predictive factor for EGFR-TKIs.

An increasingly interesting area of clinical research is the development of rationale combinations of cytotoxic drugs with molecularly targeted therapies to increase the therapeutic potential by blocking cancer cell survival mechanisms. Recently, we have shown that the sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib improves the antiproliferative effect compared with other sequences and produced a synergistic effect. We also found the sequence-dependent modulation of EGFR phosphorylation plays a role in this sequence-dependent antiproliferative effect [12]. However, we did not focus on cell lines with mutant EGFR and the exact mechanism underlying the modulation of EGFR phosphorylation remains to be determined. While other studies indicated that TGFα release is responsible for EGFR activation induced by radiotherapy [13, 14], we hypothesized that TGFα might play a role in the sequence-dependent antiproliferative effect.

Thus, the present study was performed in NSCLC cell lines harboring EGFR-activating mutations to investigate the synergistic interaction between paclitaxel and gefitinib, and to determine the underlying mechanism(s). We found that sequence-dependent TGFα expression and release were responsible for the sequence-dependent EGFR pathway modulation and sequence-dependent antiproliferative effect.

Materials and methods

Drugs and chemicals

Pure gefitinib, kindly provided by AstraZeneca (London, UK), was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a 20 mM stock solution. Paclitaxel was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) and was dissolved in DMSO as a 1 mM stock solution. Both drugs were diluted with culture medium before use.

Primary antibodies: anti-pY1068 EGFR (phosphotyrosine-specific EGFR antibody) and anti-β-actin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA), anti-EGFR was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and anti-TGFα antibody[189-2130.1] was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA).

Cell lines

The human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines PC-9, Hcc827, and H1650 were kindly provided by Dr. Tony Mok (Chinese University of Hong Kong). These cell lines have been extensively characterized. PC-9 is derived from a patient with adenocarcinoma, harboring an EGFR exon 19 in-frame deletion[E746-A750] that is highly sensitive to EGFR-TKIs[15], Hcc827 is derived from lung adenocarcinomas harboring an EGFR exon 19 in-frame deletion that is highly sensitive to EGFR-TKIs[16]. H1650 carries an EGFR exon 19 in-frame deletion mutation and is resistant to EGFR-TKIs. Martin et al. reported the homozygous deletion of PTEN in H1650 cells, which activated EGFR and contributed to erlotinib resistance[17]. PC-9/GR is a gefitinib-acquired resistant cell line that was established by chronic exposure of PC-9 cells to medium with increasing concentrations of gefitinib. Briefly, PC-9 cells were exposed to 10 nmol/L of gefitinib in medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, and the concentration was increased in a stepwised manner. Cells that were able to grow in 1 μmol/L gefitinib were obtained 6 month after initial expose. The decreased sensitivity did not recover even the cells were kept in culture for > 4 month without gefitinib. These cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 UI/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and harvested with trypsin-EDTA when the cells were in exponential growth.

Sequencing of EGFR gene

The exons encoding the intracellular domain of EGFR were amplified from genomic DNA and directly sequenced. To further characterize additional mutation, we amplified the EGFR exon 19 to 20 from PC-9 or PC-9/GR cDNA, and the PCR products were subcloned into plasmid vector, then inserts were isolated and sequenced.

Treatment regimens

Cell viability was determined using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay, according to the method of Mosmann and Carmichael [18, 19]. To evaluate the antiproliferative effects of combined treatment, cells were treated with three different sequences: I, pretreated with paclitaxel for 24 h, aspirated and washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by gefitinib for 48 h; II, pretreated with gefitinib for 48 h, aspirated and washed once with PBS, followed by paclitaxel for 24 h; III, treated concomitantly with paclitaxel plus gefitinib for 48 h, and then incubated in drug-free medium for 24 h. The different drug doses were combined using constant ratios of the IC50 values, calculated from previous cytotoxicity tests. Thus, we used 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 times the IC50 dose in paclitaxel and gefitinib combination doses to calculate the CI value. The results of sequential treatment with paclitaxel and gefitinib were analyzed according to the method of Chou and Talaly [20]. The resulting combination index (CI) represented a quantitative measure of the degree of interaction between different drugs, with CI > 1.1, CI = 0.9-1.1, and CI < 0.9 indicating antagonistic, additive, and synergistic effects, respectively. The CI value was calculated using the CompuSyn software (ComboSyn, Inc., Paramus, NJ, USA).

Western blot analysis

Cells were seeded at 1 × 105 per plate on 10-cm plates and left to settle overnight. Cells were then treated by adding fresh medium containing drugs for the desired times. Soluble protein was extracted with the addition of RIPA lysis solution. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation (12000 rpm, 4°C, 15 min), and soluble protein extracts were stored frozen at -80°C. Protein concentrations were quantitated using the bicinchoninic acid assay[21]. Total cell extracts (30 μg of protein/well) were resolved on 8-10% acrylamide Tris-acetate gels, and then proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane, blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 5% w/v non-fat milk diluted in Tris-buffered saline Tween 20 (TBST), and finally incubated with appropriate primary antibodies under the conditions recommended by the manufacturers. The blots were then washed with TBST for 30 min and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. Antibody binding was detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence system(Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

To quantify protein levels, films were scanned and analyzed with the Labworks software(World BioHazTec Corp, NM, USA). The relative protein levels were counted using a comparison with the untreated control.

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

To compare the possible influence of TGFα gene expression on the sequence-dependent synergistic effect between paclitaxel and gefitinib, we used PC-9 cells to analyze the sequential modulation of TGFα expression. The primer and probe design, total RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and quantification standards for real-time PCR were performed as described previously [22, 23]. Total RNA was isolated using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The integrity of the total RNA was examined by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, the quantity was determined based on the absorbance at 260 nm (A260), and the purity was analyzed based on the absorbance ratio at 260 and 280 nm. For pure RNA the ratio of A260/280 is ~2.0(A260/280; Amersham Biosciences GeneQuant, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). cDNA was synthesized from total RNA (1 μg) using AMV reverse transcriptase XL (Takara Bio, Inc., Shiga, Japan). β-actin served as an internal control. To create real-time PCR standards, TGFα and β-actin were amplified using reverse transcriptase-PCR and specific primers. The amplicons were cloned into the pMD18-T vector (Takara) and the sequence was confirmed by sequencing. The purified recombinant DNA was quantified and then serially diluted in ultra-pure water to a final concentration ranging from 107 to 101 copies/μL. For quantification standards, we used 1-μL aliquots of 10-fold serial dilutions of plasmid DNA. A new standard curve was run for each real-time PCR, and each test run included a control containing non-target DNA. The amount of TGFα mRNA was normalized to the expression values of the housekeeping gene β-actin.

TGFα enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Medium was harvested from cells grown on 6-well dishes. Samples were processed using the human TGFα quantikine ELISA kit (R&D systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.


Results are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE) of at least three experiments. Statistical comparisons of sequence-dependent effects were conducted by student's t tests. Statistics and graphs were generated using the GraphPad Prism software (ver. 5.00 for windows, GraphPad Software Inc, CA, USA).


The potential mechanisms for gefitinib resistance in PC-9/GR cells

The gefitinib-acquired resistant PC-9/GR cells were obtained 6 months after initial exposure. These cells were 100-fold more resistant than parental cells(Table-1). Additional mutations were not detected by direct sequencing. The PCR product of PC-9 and PC-9/GR were subcloned into a plasmid vector, then the inserts were randomly selected and sequenced. Among the 20 sequences from PC-9/GR, we found 6 sequences were wild-type, 11 had only the 15-bp deletion, and 3 had both the 15-bp deletion and T790M mutation. These T790M mutation seemed to be the cause of gefitinib resistance. Of 10 colones isolated from PC-9, 4 had no mutation, and the others had the 15-bp deletion (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

PC-9/GR exon 20 sequence. A. Wild type by direct sequencing. B. 3 of 20 clones had ACG > ATG T790M mutation by clone sequencing. C. 17 of 20 clones were wild type

Sequence-dependent antiproliferative effects differed between EGFR-TKI-sensitive and EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC cell lines

To evaluate the antiproliferative effects of paclitaxel and gefitinib treatment, we performed a series of MTT cell growth assays. Treatment with gefitinib alone for 72 h resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of cancer cell growth. Table 1 summarizes the IC50 of these two drugs. PC-9 and Hcc827 were highly sensitive to gefitinib, while H1650 exhibited primary resistance and PC-9/GR showed acquired resistance to gefitinib. All of these cell lines demonstrated similar sensitivities to paclitaxel. We evaluated the growth inhibition effect on Hcc827, PC-9, PC-9/GR, and H1650 of three different sequences of combined paclitaxel and gefitinib treatments. Figure 2a shows the schema for in vitro sequential treatment between paclitaxel and gefitinib. As shown in Figure 2b and 2c, the antiproliferative effects between paclitaxel and gefitinib were sequence-dependent. Although the differences were not marked, the sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib was most efficacious against EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells.
Table 1

IC50 values for each drug were calculated by performing dose response experiments with gefitinib and paclitaxel







2.27 ± 0.15nM

2.33 ± 0.47nM

2.59 ± 0.62nM

3.29 ± 0.35nM


16 ± 1.12nM

19 ± 2nM

2.1 ± 0.39 μM

9.37 ± 0.52 μM

Figure 2
Figure 2

The antiproliferative effect with paclitaxel and gefitinib is sequence-dependent. A. Schema of sequential treatment. B and C. The sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib produced the most potent antiproliferative effect in PC-9 and Hcc827 cells. T → G, paclitaxel followed by gefitinib. G → T, gefitinib followed by paclitaxel. T + G, concomitant paclitaxel and gefitinib. T, paclitaxel alone for 72 h. G, gefitinib alone for 72 h.

The calculation of CI values revealed that the sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib produced synergistic effects. In Hcc827 and PC-9 cell lines, which were highly sensitive to EGFR-TKIs, the sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib resulted in synergistic effects, with mean CI values of 0.63 in Hcc827, 0.54 in PC-9. Concomitant administration of the drugs resulted in both synergistic and additive effects, with mean CI values of 0.88 in Hcc827, 0.91 in PC-9. The gefitinib followed by paclitaxel sequence resulted in an additive and antagonistic interaction with mean CI values of 1.29 in Hcc827, 1.16 in PC-9 (Figure 3a,b). In the PC-9/GR cell line, which exhibited acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs, the sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib resulted in a synergistic and additive interaction with increasing drug concentrations (mean CI, 0.81). In contrast, the sequence of gefitinib followed by paclitaxel resulted in an antagonistic effect (mean CI, 1.52). Concomitant treatment with the two drugs resulted in additive and antagonistic effects (mean CI, 1.05)(Figure 3c). In the H1650 cell line, a synergistic and additive growth inhibition effect was found with the sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib (mean CI, 0.77). In contrast, the sequence of gefitinib followed by paclitaxel resulted in an antagonistic interaction (mean CI, 1.5). Simultaneous administration of the two drugs resulted in an additive and antagonistic interaction (mean CI, 1.18)(Figure 3d). Each experiment was repeated in triplicate.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Synergism of sequence-dependent cytotoxicity between paclitaxel and gefitinib. Points, mean values of three different experiments. T → G, paclitaxel followed by gefitinib. □ G → T, gefitinib followed by paclitaxel. T + G, concomitant paclitaxel and gefitinib. The sequence T → G produced the most potent cytotoxic growth inhibition. The T → G sequence resulted in a synergistic effect.

Sequence-dependent modulation of the EGFR signaling pathway

To gain insight into the mechanisms involved regulating the interaction between paclitaxel and gefitinib, we examed the effect of paclitaxel on EGFR phosphorylation. In cell lines of PC-9 and H1650, a dose-dependent increase in pEGFR levels were observed 24 hous after 1, 2 and 3 fold IC50 dose of paclitaxel exposure(Figure 4). Because EGFR-TKIs specifically target the tyrosine kinase activity of EGFR, we analyzed the sequence-dependent modulation of the EGFR signaling pathway using an IC50 dose of paclitaxel plus gefitinib combination. As shown in Figure 5, gefitinib significantly inhibited EGFR phosphorylation (p < 0.01). When Hcc827, PC-9, PC-9/GR and H1650 cell lines were exposed to paclitaxel alone, phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR) levels increased significantly after paclitaxel exposure for 24 h than that in untreated control (mean difference, +50% in Hcc827, +56% in PC-9, +39% in PC-9/GR and +69% in H1650 cells respectively, p < 0.05). The increase in pEGFR induced by paclitaxel was blocked by adding gefitinib. In the reverse sequence, gefitinib treatment for 48 h significantly inhibited pEGFR levels, compared with the untreated control level of pEGFR, and subsequent paclitaxel exposure for 24 h enhanced pEGFR levels. The paclitaxel followed by gefitinib sequence produced significantly greater pEGFR inhibition than did the reverse sequence (mean difference, -58% in Hcc827, -38% in PC-9, -35% in PC-9/GR and -30% in H1650 respectively, p < 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Effect of paclitaxel on EGFR phosphorylation. PC-9 and H1650 cells were exposed to 1, 2 and 3 fold IC50 dose paclitaxel for 24 h. A dose-dependent increase in EGFR phosphorylation levels were observed.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Sequential modulation of EGFR phosphorylation. Cells were exposed to the IC50 dose of gefitinib and paclitaxel using different sequences. *Paclitaxel significantly activated the EGFR pathway compared with control after paclitaxel exposure for 24 h (p < 0.05). # p < 0.05. The phosphorylated EGFR (p-EGFR) level after treatment with paclitaxel followed by gefitinib was lower than that for gefitinib followed by paclitaxel.

These data suggest that paclitaxel may also have a self-limiting effect on its toxicity, via activation of the EGFR tyrosine kinase phosphorylation, leading to increased proliferation and survival of paclitaxel-mediated cytotoxicity. The increase in pEGFR can be blocked by adding gefitinib, which produces a synergistic effect. In the reverse sequence, however, the sequence of gefitinib followed by paclitaxel interferes with the inhibition of pEGFR by gefitinib.

Paclitaxel-induced primary activation of EGFR is blocked by a neutralizing antibody to TGFα

Several studies have demonstrated that chemotherapy activates EGFR phosphorylation [24]. Multiple mechanisms allow for EGFR activation and persistent tumor cell proliferation, including activating mutations, receptor amplification, and ligand up-regulation [25, 26]. Other studies have found that radiation causes release of TGFα, which is responsible for activation of the EGFR signaling pathway [13]. We next examined whether activation of the EGFR signaling pathway induced by paclitaxel is dependent on TGFα. Paclitaxel caused EGFR activation in PC-9 and H1650 cells after a 12-h exposure and lasted for 48 h. Addition of a neutralizing antibody to TGFα reduced the activation of EGFR (Figure 6). These data demonstrated that paclitaxel-induced EGFR activation was dependent on the function of TGFα.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Paclitaxel-induced activation of EGFR is blocked by adding neutralizing TGFα antibody. The dose of paclitaxel is 2-fold IC50. The dose of TGFα antibody is 0.15 μg/mL A.PC-9 B. H1650

TGFα is a cognate ligand for EGFR, mediate tyrosine phosphorylation of the receptor. We then determine the growth inhibition effect of an anti-TGFα antibody. PC-9 and H1650 cells were grow into the medium containing increasing concentration of anti-TGFα antibody for 72 hours. The antibody show a modest growth inhibition effect, inhibited the growth of PC-9 and H1650 by about 30% at 500 ng/ml (Figure 7).
Figure 7
Figure 7

Growth inhibition of PC-9 and H1650 by an anti-TGFα . antibody. PC-9 and H1650 cells were grow into a 96 well plate. The following day, the cells were incubated with indicated concentration of anti-TGFα antibody for 72 h. The inhibition ratio were determined by MTT assay.

Sequence-dependent TGFα expression and release are responsible for the sequence-dependent EGFR pathway modulation

To further evaluate whether sequential modulation of the EGFR pathway is due to the release of TGFα, PC-9, Hcc827 and H1650 cells were treated with sequential paclitaxel and gefitinib as indicated in the treatment schema of Figure 2a. Medium was subjected to ELISA to verify soluble TGFα levels and was normalized to cell numbers. As shown in Figure 8a, paclitaxel exposure for 24 h significantly stimulated TGFα release. Gefitinib significantly inhibited the release of TGFα (p < 0.05). The paclitaxel-followed-by-gefitinib sequence resulted in a significant reduction of TGFα levels, compared with the reverse sequence (p < 0.05).
Figure 8
Figure 8

Sequential modulation of TGFα release and expression. Cells were exposed to IC50 dose of paclitaxel and gefitinib with different sequence. A, standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis of soluble TGFα levels in PC-9, Hcc827 and H1650 cells. *p < 0.05, significantly different from control. #P < 0.05, T→G VS G→T. B, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis of TGFα expression. *p < 0.05, significantly different from control. #P < 0.05, T→G vs. G→T.

To gain further insight into the mechanisms involved in regulating the interaction between paclitaxel and gefitinib, we examined changes in TGFα mRNA expression in treated PC-9, Hcc827 and H1650 cells. Quantitative PCR analysis of TGFα mRNA expression levels showed that in comparison with the respective control, paclitaxel significantly increased (p < 0.01), while gefitinib significantly decreased TGFα mRNA expression (p < 0.05). The paclitaxel-followed-by-gefitinib sequence significantly decreased TGFα mRNA expression, compared with the reverse sequence (Figure 8b; p < 0.05).


The present study demonstrated that the antiproliferative effect with paclitaxel and gefitinib is sequence-dependent in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells. We found that the sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib produced the most efficacious antiproliferative effect. Other studies have demonstrated sequence-dependent interaction between EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy in human cancer cell lines [27]. These studies also revealed that pretreatment with erlotinib caused G1 arrest and effectively abrogated the activity of chemotherapy, resulting in decreased cytotoxicity and decreased apoptosis [2830]. Solit et al. reported schedule-dependent efficacy in an NSCLC xenograft model with paclitaxel and gefitinib [31]. Our study was novel because we found that sequence-dependent modulation of the EGFR signaling pathway might play a role in the sequence-dependent interaction in NSCLC cells harboring an EGFR mutation. We found that paclitaxel-induced activation of EGFR was dependent on the function of TGFα. Additionally, TGFα expression and release were sequence-dependent, which may responsible for the sequence-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and gefitinib.

As EGFR-TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib are active in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, combining them in treatment with chemotherapy was deemed promising [8, 9]. However, in the INTACT-1, INTACT-2, TALENT, and TRIBUTE clinical trials, the addition of gefitinib or erlotinib to first-line chemotherapy failed to improve survival [3235]. In a phase II trial of CALGB 30406, the concurrent combination of paclitaxel plus carboplatin with erlotinib showed a similar efficacy compared with erlotinib alone in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma [36]. Gandara et al. [37, 38] proposed two hypotheses that seem reasonable to explain the negative results. First, patients were not selected based on a predictive response marker, although other studies have reported that activating mutations in the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain were associated with a dramatic response to gefitinib and erlotinib. Second, potentiation of the antagonistic interaction between concurrent EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy may have played a role, because in vitro and in vivo studies of administration of concurrent EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy have suggested antagonism. Davies et al. [39] have proposed the pharmacodynamic separation model: EGFR-TKIs primarily cause cell cycle arrest and accumulation of cells in G1; and thus, when administered concurrently with chemotherapy, can interfere with cell cycle-specific cytotoxicity. Our previous study[12] and other study[30] found that EGFR-TKI induces G1 arrest, which produced a negative interaction when combined concurrently with chemotherapy or followed by chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy has been shown to activate multiple signaling pathways [40] and, recently, to activate the EGFR pathway as well as to enhance ubiquitination and degradation [41, 42]. The intracellular TK activity of EGFR is increased as a consequence of binding of various cognate ligands, including EGF, TGFα, and amphiregulin, leading to homodimerization of two EGFRs or heterodimerization of EGFR with other family members [43]. Improper activation of EGFR TK results in increased malignant cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis [44, 45]. Several chemotherapy drugs were found to activate the EGFR signaling pathway [41]. Radiation has also been demonstrated to activate the EGFR signaling pathway by causing the release of TGFα, which is responsible for secondary activation of EGFR, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and Janus kinase (JNK) pathways [13]. In the present study, neutralizing TGFα abolished the paclitaxel induced-activation of EGFR, and paclitaxel may stimulate release of TGFα to activate the EGFR pathway.

Autocrine loops are established when soluble factors secreted by cells bind to and stimulate receptors on their own surfaces [46]. TGFα is a cognate ligand for EGFR and can establish an autocrine loop that leads to receptor hyperactivity[47]. Ciardiello, et al. found that a TGFα-EGFR autocrine growth pathway is active in cancer cell lines, and gefitinib produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the secretion of TGFα[48]. Our data suggest that paclitaxel may exert a self-limiting effect on its ability to kill and reduce the proliferation of autocrine-regulated tumor cells, potentially by increasing both the rates of transcription and activation of TGFα. Increased expression and release of TGFα leads to both increased EGFR and activation of the downstream signaling pathway, which, in turn, leads to both increased proliferation of tumor cells as well as other enhanced cytoprotective responses. Increased TGFα expression and release can be blocked by subsequent administration of gefitinib, which can block TGFα-triggered EGFR signaling pathway activation and produce a synergistic effect. In contrast, initial exposure to gefitinib decreases TGFα expression and release, and subsequent paclitaxel treatment enhances TGFα expression and release, producing an antagonistic effect.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC has reached a plateau, but further improvements are expected with the integration of targeted therapies[49, 50]. EGFR-TKIs treatment concurrent with chemotherapy failed to improve survival. Alternative schedules of TKI administration in combination with chemotherapy, such as sequential and pulse administration, are under investigation. In the Fast-Act trial, a randomized phase II trial of sequential erlotinib and chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC, gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin (GC) were sequentially followed by erlotinib (GC-E) versus GC followed by a placebo (GC-P). The results revealed that GC-E significantly improved PFS compared with GC-P [51]. Based on these results, Fast-Act II, a randomized phase III trial of sequential erlotinib and chemotherapy, is underway[52].

In the final analysis of the pivotal IPASS trial, although there is significant improvement in PFS and RR for patients receiving gefitinib, overall survival was similar for gefitinib and carboplatin/paclitaxel, reported Chin-Hsin Yang[53]. The effect of the initial randomized treatment therapy on overall survival is likely to have been confounded by subsequent study, particulary, the switching of patients to the alternative study treatment. This suggests the sequence of therapy may not make a significant impact in patients with mutant EGFR, as long as such patients are exposed to an EGFR TKI in general, and whether it is given first-line or later translates into the same overall survival benefit.

The limitation of this study is that because the short exposure time, the interaction of sequential treatment in vitro may not correlate the interaction between first-line and second-line treatment in clinic. The drug interaction patterns observed in vitro may not be similar to those observed clinically. Because the culture condition can perturb cell function and potentiate drug sensitivity, obtaining good correlations can be problematic. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, rescue effects and toxicity to normal cells/tissues that affect drug action in clinical setting are not considered by in vitro assays. Because each patient has a unique pharmacogenetic makeup, correlating in vitro and clinical results is often not a straightforward process. However, our study provided a rational for the ongoing clinical investigation of sequential treatment of NSCLC.


In summary, our studies have demonstrated that sequential administrations of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib result in the most effective cytotoxic effects in NSCLC cell lines harboring EGFR mutations. The sequence-dependent modulation of TGFα expression and release might be responsible for the synergistic interaction between paclitaxel and gefitinib. Although the extrapolation of in vitro data to the clinical setting should be considered with caution, these results may have implications for the rational development of chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of NSCLC.



This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30772531), and Zhuhai Science & Technology Bureau (No.20081040)

Authors’ Affiliations

Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute; Medical Research Center of Guangdong General Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.106, Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Guangzhou, Postal code:510080, People's Republic of China
Thoracic oncology, the fifth affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-Sen university, No. 52, Meihua Dong Rd, Zhuhai, Postal code:519000, People's Republic of China


  1. Socinski MA, Crowell R, Hensing TE, Langer CJ, Lilenbaum R, Sandler AB, Morris D: Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2007, 132 (3 Suppl): 277S-289S. 10.1378/chest.07-1381. 2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Felip E, Stahel RA, Pavlidis N: ESMO Minimum Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol. 2005, 16 (Suppl 1): i28-29. 10.1093/annonc/mdi821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu J, Johnson DH: Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346 (2): 92-98. 10.1056/NEJMoa011954.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Smit EF, van Meerbeeck JP, Lianes P, Debruyne C, Legrand C, Schramel F, Smit H, Gaafar R, Biesma B, Manegold C: Three-arm randomized study of two cisplatin-based regimens and paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group--EORTC 08975. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21 (21): 3909-3917. 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, Harris PL, Haserlat SM, Supko JG, Haluska FG: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350 (21): 2129-2139. 10.1056/NEJMoa040938.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, Herman P, Kaye FJ, Lindeman N, Boggon TJ: EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science. 2004, 304 (5676): 1497-1500. 10.1126/science.1099314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, Doherty J, Politi K, Sarkaria I, Singh B, Heelan R, Rusch V, Fulton L: EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (36): 13306-13311. 10.1073/pnas.0405220101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, Sunpaweravong P, Han B, Margono B, Ichinose Y: Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361 (10): 947-957. 10.1056/NEJMoa0810699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, Seto T, Satouchi M, Tada H, Hirashima T: Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 11 (2): 121-128. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70364-X.Google Scholar
  10. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, Gemma A, Harada M, Yoshizawa H, Kinoshita I: Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 362 (25): 2380-2388. 10.1056/NEJMoa0909530.Google Scholar
  11. Wu YL, Zhong WZ, Li LY, Zhang XT, Zhang L, Zhou CC, Liu W, Jiang B, Mu XL, Lin JY: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and their correlation with gefitinib therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on updated individual patient data from six medical centers in mainland China. J Thorac Oncol. 2007, 2 (5): 430-439. 10.1097/01.JTO.0000268677.87496.4c.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng H, An SJ, Zhang XC, Dong S, Zhang YF, Chen ZH, Chen HJ, Guo AL, Lin QX, Wu YL: In vitro sequence-dependent synergism between paclitaxel and gefitinib in human lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol.Google Scholar
  13. Dent P, Reardon DB, Park JS, Bowers G, Logsdon C, Valerie K, Schmidt-Ullrich R: Radiation-induced release of transforming growth factor alpha activates the epidermal growth factor receptor and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in carcinoma cells, leading to increased proliferation and protection from radiation-induced cell death. Mol Biol Cell. 1999, 10 (8): 2493-2506.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Valerie K, Chan W, Wazer DE, Lin PS: Expression of oestrogen receptor and transforming growth factor-alpha in MCF-7 cells after exposure to fractionated irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992, 61 (3): 405-415. 10.1080/09553009214551101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Koizumi F, Shimoyama T, Taguchi F, Saijo N, Nishio K: Establishment of a human non-small cell lung cancer cell line resistant to gefitinib. Int J Cancer. 2005, 116 (1): 36-44. 10.1002/ijc.20985.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Amann J, Kalyankrishna S, Massion PP, Ohm JE, Girard L, Shigematsu H, Peyton M, Juroske D, Huang Y, Stuart Salmon J: Aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor signaling and enhanced sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (1): 226-235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sos ML, Koker M, Weir BA, Heynck S, Rabinovsky R, Zander T, Seeger JM, Weiss J, Fischer F, Frommolt P: PTEN loss contributes to erlotinib resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer by activation of Akt and EGFR. Cancer Res. 2009, 69 (8): 3256-3261. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4055.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983, 65 (1-2): 55-63. 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Carmichael J, DeGraff WG, Gazdar AF, Minna JD, Mitchell JB: Evaluation of a tetrazolium-based semiautomated colorimetric assay: assessment of chemosensitivity testing. Cancer Res. 1987, 47 (4): 936-942.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chou TC: Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol Rev. 2006, 58 (3): 621-681. 10.1124/pr.58.3.10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC: Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem. 1985, 150 (1): 76-85. 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90442-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. An SJ, Nie Q, Chen ZH, Lin QX, Wang Z, Xie Z, Chen SL, Huang Y, Zhang AY, Yan JF: KDR expression is associated with the stage and cigarette smoking of the patients with lung cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007, 133 (9): 635-642. 10.1007/s00432-007-0214-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dong S, Guo AL, Chen ZH, Wang Z, Zhang XC, Huang Y, Xie Z, Yan HH, Cheng H, Wu YL: RRM1 single nucleotide polymorphism -37C-->A correlates with progression-free survival in NSCLC patients after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. 3: 10-10.1186/1756-8722-3-10.Google Scholar
  24. Giovannetti E, Lemos C, Tekle C, Smid K, Nannizzi S, Rodriguez JA, Ricciardi S, Danesi R, Giaccone G, Peters GJ: Molecular mechanisms underlying the synergistic interaction of erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with the multitargeted antifolate pemetrexed in non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2008, 73 (4): 1290-1300. 10.1124/mol.107.042382.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Franovic A, Gunaratnam L, Smith K, Robert I, Patten D, Lee S: Translational up-regulation of the EGFR by tumor hypoxia provides a nonmutational explanation for its overexpression in human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104 (32): 13092-13097. 10.1073/pnas.0702387104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Normanno N, De Luca A, Bianco C, Strizzi L, Mancino M, Maiello MR, Carotenuto A, De Feo G, Caponigro F, Salomon DS: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene. 2006, 366 (1): 2-16. 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu JM, Azzariti A, Colucci G, Paradiso A: The effect of gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839) in combination with oxaliplatin is schedule-dependent in colon cancer cell lines. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003, 52 (6): 442-448. 10.1007/s00280-003-0687-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Li T, Ling YH, Goldman ID, Perez-Soler R: Schedule-dependent cytotoxic synergism of pemetrexed and erlotinib in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13 (11): 3413-3422. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2923.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gumerlock PH, Pryde BJ, Kimura T: Enhanced cytotoxicity of docetaxel OSI-774 combination in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003, 22: abstr 2661Google Scholar
  30. Mahaffey CM, Davies AM, Lara PN, Pryde B, Holland W, Mack PC, Gumerlock PH, Gandara DR: Schedule-dependent apoptosis in K-ras mutant non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines treated with docetaxel and erlotinib: rationale for pharmacodynamic separation. Clin Lung Cancer. 2007, 8 (9): 548-553. 10.3816/CLC.2007.n.041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Solit DB, She Y, Lobo J, Kris MG, Scher HI, Rosen N, Sirotnak FM: Pulsatile administration of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib is significantly more effective than continuous dosing for sensitizing tumors to paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (5): 1983-1989. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Giaccone G, Herbst RS, Manegold C, Scagliotti G, Rosell R, Miller V, Natale RB, Schiller JH, Von Pawel J, Pluzanska A: Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 1. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22 (5): 777-784. 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Herbst RS, Giaccone G, Schiller JH, Natale RB, Miller V, Manegold C, Scagliotti G, Rosell R, Oliff I, Reeves JA: Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 2. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22 (5): 785-794. 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, Fehrenbacher L, Johnson BE, Sandler A, Kris MG, Tran HT, Klein P, Li X: TRIBUTE: a phase III trial of erlotinib hydrochloride (OSI-774) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (25): 5892-5899. 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gatzemeier U, Pluzanska A, Szczesna A, Kaukel E, Roubec J, De Rosa F, Milanowski J, Karnicka-Mlodkowski H, Pesek M, Serwatowski P: Phase III study of erlotinib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Tarceva Lung Cancer Investigation Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25 (12): 1545-1552. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1474.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Janne PA, Wang XF, Socinski MA: Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib (E) alone or in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) in never or light former smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: CALGB 30406. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28 (15s): suppl;abstr 7503Google Scholar
  37. Gandara D, Narayan S, Lara PN, Goldberg Z, Davies A, Lau DH, Mack P, Gumerlock P, Vijayakumar S: Integration of novel therapeutics into combined modality therapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (13 Pt 2): 5057s-5062s. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-9012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gandara DR, Gumerlock PH: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus chemotherapy: case closed or is the jury still out?. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (25): 5856-5858. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Davies AM, Ho C, Lara PN, Mack P, Gumerlock PH, Gandara DR: Pharmacodynamic separation of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2006, 7 (6): 385-388. 10.3816/CLC.2006.n.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Torres K, Horwitz SB: Mechanisms of Taxol-induced cell death are concentration dependent. Cancer Res. 1998, 58 (16): 3620-3626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Chun PY, Feng FY, Scheurer AM, Davis MA, Lawrence TS, Nyati MK: Synergistic effects of gemcitabine and gefitinib in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006, 66 (2): 981-988. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2665.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ahsan A, Hiniker SM, Ramanand SG, Nyati S, Hegde A, Helman A, Menawat R, Bhojani MS, Lawrence TS, Nyati MK: Role of epidermal growth factor receptor degradation in cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 70 (7): 2862-2869. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4294.Google Scholar
  43. Bazley LA, Gullick WJ: The epidermal growth factor receptor family. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005, 12 (Suppl 1): S17-27. 10.1677/erc.1.01032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Citri A, Yarden Y: EGF-ERBB signalling: towards the systems level. Nature reviews. 2006, 7 (7): 505-516.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ciardiello F, Tortora G: EGFR antagonists in cancer treatment. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358 (11): 1160-1174. 10.1056/NEJMra0707704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sporn MB, Roberts AB: Autocrine secretion--10 years later. Ann Intern Med. 1992, 117 (5): 408-414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Putnam EA, Yen N, Gallick GE, Steck PA, Fang K, Akpakip B, Gazdar AF, Roth JA: Autocrine growth stimulation by transforming growth factor-alpha in human non-small cell lung cancer. Surg Oncol. 1992, 1 (1): 49-60. 10.1016/0960-7404(92)90056-Q.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ciardiello F, Caputo R, Bianco R, Damiano V, Fontanini G, Cuccato S, De Placido S, Bianco AR, Tortora G: Inhibition of growth factor production and angiogenesis in human cancer cells by ZD1839 (Iressa), a selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7 (5): 1459-1465.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Katzel JA, Fanucchi MP, Li Z: Recent advances of novel targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2009, 2: 2-10.1186/1756-8722-2-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Mirshahidi HR, Hsueh CT: Updates in non-small cell lung cancer--insights from the 2009 45th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Hematol Oncol. 3: 18-10.1186/1756-8722-3-18.Google Scholar
  51. Mok TS, Wu YL, Yu CJ, Zhou C, Chen YM, Zhang L, Ignacio J, Liao M, Srimuninnimit V, Boyer MJ: Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study of sequential erlotinib and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27 (30): 5080-5087. 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5541.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Roche HL: A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) or Placebo in Combination With Platinum-Based Therapy as First Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. 2009, Identifier NCT00883779Google Scholar
  53. Yang CH, Fukuoka M, Mok TSea: Final overall survival results from a phase III randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib V carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Asia. 35th ESMO Congress. 2010, Abstract LBA2. Presented October 11Google Scholar


© Cheng et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.